Egypt's Ottoman Past

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Egypt's Ottoman Past “Remembering” Egypt’s Ottoman Past: Ottoman Consciousness in Egypt, 1841-1914 Dissertation Presented in the Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Doğa Öztürk, M.A. Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2020 Dissertation Committee Prof. Carter V. Findley, Advisor Prof. Jane Hathaway Prof. Scott Levi Copyrighted by Doğa Öztürk 2020 Abstract Scholarship on modern Egyptian history supports a narrative that depicts Egypt emerging as an independent political entity in the mid-19th century and steadily marching towards becoming a sovereign nation-state in the first decades of the 20th century. The Ottoman cultural context, within which Egypt operated at this time, is usually nowhere to be found in this story. This dissertation remedies this gap in the literature and “remembers” Egypt’s Ottoman past between 1841, when Mehmed Ali Pasha was granted the hereditary governorship of Egypt, and 1914, when Egypt’s remaining political ties to the Ottoman Empire were severed by the British Empire. Primarily based on a variety of sources produced in Arabic and Ottoman Turkish, it argues that even though the political ties between Istanbul and Cairo were weakening and a more distinct Egyptian identity was on the rise at this time, the Ottoman cultural consciousness continued to provide an important framework for the ruling and intellectual elite of Egypt, as well as the wider segments of the Egyptian public, until World War I. Taking a thematic approach to the subject, the dissertation demonstrates how the Ottoman imperial court culture provided a blueprint for the ruling elite in Egypt. Moreover, it asserts that Arabic-speaking intellectuals of Egypt, both male and female, continued to self-identify as “Ottomans” in their reactions to some of the momentous events that the Ottoman Empire was facing at the end of the 19th and early 20th centuries. Additionally, it demonstrates how these Arabic-speaking intellectuals utilized the idea of Ottoman consciousness in their efforts to resist European imperialism, which became particularly urgent after Britain occupied Egypt in 1882. Finally, my dissertation asserts that wider segments of the public in Egypt continued to demonstrate a sense of Ottoman consciousness in their reactions to the aforementioned events that the Ottoman Empire was going through at the time. ii Dedication To my parents, “Ders çalışırken” bana her zaman destek oldukları için iii Acknowledgments One of the first sections that I usually read when I open a book is the “Acknowledgements.” I always take a strange pleasure in going over whom the writer thanked and whether there is anyone I know among the names that are listed. Right now, I am very glad that I reached a point where I have to write one myself. I must say that countless individuals played a role in helping me get where I am today and I apologize from the start if I cannot include every single one of them here. I will begin with my advisor, Prof. Carter V. Findley. Through his example and mentorship, Prof. Findley taught me how to be a true scholar. He always pushed me to produce the best work that I could put forth and showed me the importance of being diligent and rigorous in my writing. From the first moment that he agreed to take me on as a doctoral student, Prof. Findley continued to believe in me and made me realize that I had what it takes to do many things that I thought I was not capable of doing. He was always ready to assist me and provided support whenever I needed him. It goes without saying that this dissertation would not have been possible without his guidance. Prof. Jane Hathaway was the one who introduced me to the academic literature on Ottoman Egypt. The comments that she made on an early proposal for this project continued to provide me with guiding principles throughout the whole writing process. Her seminars taught me how to think about Islamic history as well as how to critically engage with primary sources. The conversations I had with her, whether in her office, at a Thanksgiving dinner, or through e- mail, gave me with the emotional support that enabled me to keep on going, especially at times when I was not really sure I could. It was also a pleasure to be her grader at numerous points in iv my career as a graduate assistant, where I learned a lot from her on how to be an effective teacher. Prof. Scott Levi was the one who taught me to think critically about the idea of “empire.” His emphasis on the necessary balance that had to exist between theory and empirical data was also something that I took from him and tried to integrate in my work as a scholar. In his role as the chair of the department, he was also very helpful in assisting me to navigate the bureaucratic processes of the school. The archival research on which this dissertation is based would not have been possible without the financial assistance that I received from a number of sources. The Adıvar Fellowship, provided by the Ohio State University Department of History, enabled me to visit numerous archives and manuscript libraries in Istanbul and London in the academic year of 2015-2016. Further research in London in the summers of 2017 and 2018, was made possible by the Graduate Student Research Grant from the Mershon Center for International Security Studies as well as the Sydney N. Fisher Memorial Award in Ottoman and Turkish Studies from the Ohio State University Department of History. I also want to extend my gratitude to the staff at the Prime Ministry Ottoman Archives in Istanbul and the British Library and the National British Archives in London, who provided me with valuable assistance in conducting my research. In addition to my committee members, a number of individuals contributed to a great extent to my intellectual and professional development as a scholar. Prof. Ekmeleddin İhsanoğlu, whose Turks in Egypt and their Cultural Legacy provided the first impetus for this dissertation, was kind enough to meet me multiple times in Istanbul and discuss my project. He also read an earlier draft of the chapter on Kadriye Hüseyin and made very useful comments, for which I want to extend my gratitude. In my two sessions at Middlebury Arabic Summer School, in the v summers of 2013 and 2014, I was fortunate enough to work with Ustadha Hanan, Shahira Yacout, Immam Awad, and Yasser Mokhtar, who taught me the intricacies of Arabic grammar and provided me with the necessary skillset that enabled me to tackle complex texts in Arabic. At the Ottoman and Turkish Summer School in Cunda, Selim Kuru introduced me to the complex world of Ottoman paleography and was kind enough to discuss my project, which was at its very early stages at the time. Finally, Simon Waldman, my advisor at King’s College London, was the first person who pushed me towards doing archival research and who also taught me to “go the extra mile” and find my own voice in my work. Friends and colleagues from many parts of the world supported me throughout my career as a graduate student. During his time at Ohio State University, Saba Nasseri was a true friend, someone whom I consider myself lucky to have met. The conversations that we had, spanning a diverse set of topics, some academic and some not so academic, made my life in Columbus much more bearable. Yeliz Çavus was one of the best archival research buddies that I could ask for. She also provided me with the encouragement that I needed more times than I care to admit as well as letting me crash at her place when I needed somewhere to stay in Columbus in November 2019. Isacar Bolaños made it much easier for me to navigate the whole writing process and answered my incessant questions with the patience of a saint. Gülşah Torunoğlu shared her experiences with me regarding her research, introduced me to the archives in Istanbul, and gave me ideas on how to approach my own topic. Patrick Scharfe was my first housemate when I started the program at the Ohio State and I truly enjoyed his companionship and the late night talks that we had about pretty much everything. Johanna Sellman provided me with invaluable assistance in her role as the Middle East Librarian at the Ohio State University. The lunch and dinner breaks that I took with Jake Steinhart before I headed back to the library were always a vi pleasure. The same is also true for the talks that I had with Emre Demirocak. I am grateful to Catalina and Garrett Hunt for welcoming me to their home and keeping an eye on my stuff while I was away from Columbus. Friends from other parts of the United States, Ryan Rudat, James Sheehan, Brianna White-Gaynor, and Chisda Magid, and Oscar Aguirre-Mandujano also helped me one way or another during my graduate studies. Lastly, Alienor Chalot, in addition to assisting me with French translations, also always encouraged me to keep on going. At this point, I do not think I can find the adequate words to thank Onur Güven, Ulaş Öztürk, and Idil Yanmaz, whose apartment I more or less “invaded” for long stretches of time during my many (for them, probably too many) research and writing trips to London. I am grateful for their friendship and for the fact that they chose not to kick me out. It was always wonderful to hang out with Chris Bates and Ghazaleh Djafari-Marbini, two of my best friends from my Master’s program, whenever I was in town.
Recommended publications
  • EMINE Ö. EVERED, Phd, Associate Professor of History Department of History (517)432-8222, Ext
    EMINE Ö. EVERED, PhD, Associate Professor of History Department of History (517)432-8222, ext. 153 Michigan State University (517)353-5599 (dept. fax) 526 W Circle Drive, Room #4-D (517)337-2445 (home) East Lansing, MI 48824-1036 [email protected] EDUCATION PhD, History, 2005, University of Arizona Concentration: European History – Middle East emphasis o Minor: Near Eastern Studies (in both Arabic & Persian languages & literatures) Dissertation: The Politics of Late Ottoman Education: Accommodating Ethno-Religious Pluralism amid Imperial Disintegration MA, History, 1994, University of Wisconsin – Madison Concentration: Modern European History – Middle East emphasis Thesis: The 1924 Abolition of the Caliphate & the Reaction of Turkish, Arabic, & Western Interests ABD, History, 1994, Atatürk University: Research Institute of the Principles of Kemalism & the History of Revolutions. Erzurum, Turkey Concentration: Ottoman & Modern Turkish History MA, History, 1990, Atatürk University: Research Institute of the Principles of Kemalism & the History of Revolutions. Erzurum, Turkey Concentration: Ottoman & Modern Turkish History Thesis: II. Meşrutiyet'ten Cumhuriyet'in İlanına kadar Türkiye’de Kadın Cemiyetleri: 1908-1923 [“Turkish Women's Associations between the 2nd Constitution & the Turkish republic: 1908-1923”] BA, History, 1987, Atatürk University: Faculty of Arts & Sciences, Erzurum, Turkey LANGUAGES Turkish, modern (fluent); English (fluent); Ottoman Turkish (fluent); Arabic (semi-fluent reading & writing; conversational proficiency
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnic Identity in Graeco-Roman Egypt Instructor
    Egypt after the Pharaohs: Ethnic Identity in Graeco-Roman Egypt Instructor: Rachel Mairs [email protected] 401-863-2306 Office hours: Rhode Island Hall 202. Tues 2-3pm, Thurs 11am-12pm, or by appointment. Course Description Egypt under Greek and Roman rule (from c. 332 BC) was a diverse place, its population including Egyptians, Greeks, Jews, Romans, Nubians, Arabs, and even Indians. This course will explore the sometimes controversial subject of ethnic identity and its manifestations in the material and textual record from Graeco-Roman Egypt, through a series of case studies involving individual people and communities. Topics will include multilingualism, ethnic conflict and discrimination, legal systems, and gender, using evidence from contemporary texts on papyrus as well as recent archaeological excavations and field survey projects. Course Objectives By the end of the course, participants should understand and be able to articulate: • how Graeco-Roman Egypt functioned as a diverse multiethnic, multilingual society. • the legal and political frameworks within which this diversity was organised and negotiated. • how research in the social sciences on multilingualism and ethnic identity can be utilised to provide productive and interesting approaches to the textual and archaeological evidence from Graeco-Roman Egypt. Students will also gain a broad overview of Egypt’s history from its conquest by Alexander the Great, through its rule by the Ptolemies, to the defeat of Cleopatra and Mark Antony and its integration into the Roman Empire, to the rise of Christianity. Course Requirements Attendance and participation (10%); assignments (2 short essays of 4-5 pages) and quizzes/map exercises (50%); extended essay on individual topics to be decided in consultation with me (c.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the British Invasion of Egypt (1882) Through the Lens of Victorian Party Politics
    Tarih Dergisi, Sayı 69 (2019/1), İstanbul 2019, s. 113-134 AN ANALYSIS OF THE BRITISH INVASION OF EGYPT (1882) THROUGH THE LENS OF VICTORIAN PARTY POLITICS Begüm Yıldızeli Dr. Öğr. Üyesi, Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, Uluslararası İlişkiler Bölümü, Bilecik, Türkiye Abstract The British occupation of Egypt in 1882 meant a breakaway from the Anglo-French entente’s control over Ottoman financial system and the end of the Liberal Government’s ‘reluctant’ imperialism. When the Liberal ministry began in 1880, the cabinet immediately focused on foreign policies towards the Ottoman Empire subsequent to Gladstone’s campaign during the Bulgarian Agitation which had already turned out to be a party question. The protection of the Suez Canal as well as the interests of the British bondholders and the prestige of the British Empire was vital, which united the Liberal ministry and the Conservatives under the same purpose. Despite late Ottoman approval, the occupation signified the edge of Anglo-Ottoman alliance during the nineteenth century. This study will analyse why the Egyptian question is important for British party politics and to what extend the Anglo-Ottoman relations was affected with these circumstances. Keywords: Suez Canal, British Party Politics, Egypt, Urabi Pasha Öz VİKTORYA DÖNEMİ PARTİ SİYASETİ PERSPEKTİFİNDEN İNGİLİZLER’İN MISIR’I İŞGALİ (1882) ÜZERİNE BİR ANALİZ 1882 yılında İngilizler ’in Mısır’ı işgali gerek İngiliz Hükümeti’nin ‘gönülsüz’ emperyaliz- minin gerekse de Osmanlı ekonomisindeki
    [Show full text]
  • About Bulgaria
    Source: Zone Bulgaria (http://en.zonebulgaria.com/) About Bulgaria General Information about Bulgaria Bulgaria is a country in Southeastern Europe and is situated on the Balkan Peninsula. To the north the country borders Rumania, to the east – the Black Sea, to the south – Turkey and Greece, and to the west – Yugoslavia and Macedonia. Bulgaria is a parliamentary republic with a National Assembly (One House Parliament) of 240 national representatives. The President is Head of State. Geography of Bulgaria The Republic of Bulgaria covers a territory of 110 993 square kilometres. The average altitude of the country is 470 metres above sea level. The Stara Planina Mountain occupies central position and serves as a natural dividing line from the west to the east. It is a 750 km long mountain range stretching from the Vrushka Chuka Pass to Cape Emine and is part of the Alpine-Himalayan mountain range. It reaches the Black Sea to the east and turns to the north along the Bulgarian-Yugoslavian border. A natural boundary with Romania is the Danube River, which is navigable all along for cargo and passenger vessels. The Black Sea is the natural eastern border of Bulgaria and its coastline is 378 km long. There are clearly cut bays, the biggest two being those of Varna and Bourgas. About 25% of the coastline are covered with sand and hosts our seaside resorts. The southern part of Bulgaria is mainly mountainous. The highest mountain is Rila with Mt. Moussala being the highest peak on the Balkan Peninsula (2925 m). The second highest and the mountain of most alpine character in Bulgaria is Pirin with its highest Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 31 Notes: Societies at Crossroads
    Chapter 31 Notes: Societies at Crossroads Chapter Outline I. Introduction: Ottoman empire, Russia, China, and Japan A. Common problems 1. Military weakness, vulnerability to foreign threats 2. Internal weakness due to economic problems, financial difficulties, and corruption B. Reform efforts 1. Attempts at political and educational reform and at industrialization 2. Turned to western models C. Different results of reforms 1. Ottoman empire, Russia, and China unsuccessful; societies on the verge of collapse 2. Reform in Japan was more thorough; Japan emerged as an industrial power II. The Ottoman empire in decline A. The nature of decline 1. Military decline since the late seventeenth century a. Ottoman forces behind European armies in strategy, tactics, weaponry, training b. Janissary corps politically corrupt, undisciplined c. Provincial governors gained power, private armies 2. Extensive territorial losses in nineteenth century a. Lost Caucasus and central Asia to Russia; western frontiers to Austria; Balkan provinces to Greece and Serbia b. Egypt gained autonomy after Napoleon's failed campaign in 1798 (a) Egyptian general Muhammad Ali built a powerful, modern army (b) Ali's army threatened Ottomans, made Egypt an autonomous province 3. Economic difficulties began in seventeenth century a. Less trade through empire as Europeans shifted to the Atlantic Ocean basin b. Exported raw materials, imported European manufactured goods c. Heavily depended on foreign loans, half of the revenues paid to loan interest d. Foreigners began to administer the debts of the Ottoman state by 1882 4. The "capitulations": European domination of Ottoman economy a. Extraterritoriality: Europeans exempt from Ottoman law within the empire b.
    [Show full text]
  • Ayaş'in Xix.Yüzyil Ortalarinda Sosyal Ve Ekonomik Yapisi
    AYAŞ’IN XIX.YÜZYIL ORTALARINDA SOSYAL VE EKONOMİK YAPISI ÜZERİNE TESPİTLER VE SONUÇLAR Şennur ŞENEL-Ali Fuat KARAMAN Özet Bu çalışmada Ankara iline bağlı Ayaş kazasının 19. yüzyıl ortalarındaki sosyal ve ekonomik yapısı, döneme ait temettuat defterleri kullanılarak ortaya konulmaya çalışılmaktadır. Çalışmanın metodunu oluşturan ana unsur, Türk Tarih Kurumu çatısı altında 1995–2000 yılları arasında yapılan Tüsoktar projesi kapsamında yer alan çalışmada oluşturulmuş veri tabanı sistemidir. Bu sistem kullanılarak Ayaş’a ait temettuat defterlerindeki veriler, söz konusu veri tabanına girilmiş ve daha sonra sorgulanmıştır. Sonuçta elde edilen rakamlar, gerek temettuat verileriyle ilgilenen araştırmacılar, gerekse genel itibariyle Osmanlı sosyal ve ekonomi tarihi ile ilgilenen akademisyenlerin bilgilerine sunulmaktadır. Bu çerçevede başlıklar altında incelediğimiz konular şu şekildedir: Kazanın 19.yüzyıl ikinci yarısındaki idari yapısı ve yerleşim düzeni, aynı dönemde kazanın nüfusuna ait tespitler, çalışma hayatı ve buna bağlı olarak gelir dağılımı ile taşınır ve taşınmaz mülklerin nüfusa göre dağılımları, kazada yapılan hayvancılık. Nihai olarak da bütün bu gelir kalemlerine bağlı olarak kazanın Osmanlı vergi düzenindeki yeri tespit edilmeye çalışılmıştır. Anahtar kelimleler: Ayaş (Ankara), Osmanlı sosyal ve ekonomik hayatı(19. yüzyıl) , temettuat defterleri. Findings and Conclutions on the Socio-Economic Structure of the Town of Ayaş (Ayasch) in the Midst of 19th Century Absract This study puts before you the socio-economic structure of the town of Ayaş, appertaining to Ankara city, in the midst of 19th century following a perusal over the inventories about the collected taxes on the earnings of people in that time. The main element that formulates the method of this study is the database system that was created in the framework of Tüsoktar Project that was carried out by the Turkish Historical Society (TTK) in the years between 1995 and 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Pax Britannica and the Anti-Systemic Movement of Viceroy Mehmet Ali Pasha of Egypt
    PAX BRITANNICA AND THE ANTI-SYSTEMIC MOVEMENT OF VICEROY MEHMET ALI PASHA OF EGYPT A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY OKYANUS AKIN IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS DECEMBER 2019 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Yaşar Kondakçı Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. Prof. Dr. Oktay Tanrısever Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. Assoc. Prof. Dr. M. Fatih Tayfur Supervisor Examining Committee Members Prof. Dr. Hüseyin Bağcı (METU, IR) Assoc. Prof. Dr. M. Fatih Tayfur (METU, IR) Prof. Dr. Çınar Özen (Ankara Uni., IR) I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last Name: Okyanus Akın Signature: iii ABSTRACT PAX BRITANNICA AND THE ANTI-SYSTEMIC MOVEMENT OF VICEROY MEHMET ALI PASHA OF EGYPT Akın, Okyanus M.S., Department of International Relations Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Dr. M. Fatih Tayfur December 2019, 234 pages The Pax Britannica, as a system, defined the political-economy of the nineteenth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Egyptian Culture and Trade Cultural Study
    Egyptian Culture and Trade Cultural Study Take a look at the things around you. Can you spot anything that was grown or made within 10 miles of your home? Look at your clothing. How many hundreds or thousands of miles did they travel from the factory to reach you? The importance of international trade is evident everywhere you look. Trade was also important to the economies of ancient civilizations. When Egyptians first settled along the Nile, the resources of the river supplied them with what they needed to survive. Grain grew quickly in the healthy soil of the Nile, so the people had plenty to eat. The Egyptians used mud and stones found along the river to make sturdy homes and monuments. Clothing, paper, and lamp oil were all locally produced from plants and animals. Ancient Egyptians traded along the Nile Of course, ancient Egyptians soon desired River and beyond. The Nile is the winding things that could not be produced locally. blue body of water to the left. Can you guess from the map what the main route of trade from Egypt was? If you guessed the Nile River, you are correct. The Nile River is the longest river in the world. It has the unusual quality of flowing northward into the Mediterranean Sea. Access to the Red Sea and the Mediterranean Sea opened Egypt to foreign cultures and influences. Large boats made of wood navigated up the Nile and sailed throughout the region. These boats returned with items that the Egyptians desired. As Egyptian civilization developed, the need grew for better wood.
    [Show full text]
  • 1768-1830S a Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate
    A PLAGUE ON BOTH HOUSES?: POPULATION MOVEMENTS AND THE SPREAD OF DISEASE ACROSS THE OTTOMAN-RUSSIAN BLACK SEA FRONTIER, 1768-1830S A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History By Andrew Robarts, M.S.F.S. Washington, DC December 17, 2010 Copyright 2010 by Andrew Robarts All Rights Reserved ii A PLAGUE ON BOTH HOUSES?: POPULATION MOVEMENTS AND THE SPREAD OF DISEASE ACROSS THE OTTOMAN-RUSSIAN BLACK SEA FRONTIER, 1768-1830S Andrew Robarts, M.S.F.S. Dissertation Advisor: Catherine Evtuhov, Ph. D. ABSTRACT Based upon a reading of Ottoman, Russian, and Bulgarian archival documents, this dissertation examines the response by the Ottoman and Russian states to the accelerated pace of migration and spread of disease in the Black Sea region from the outbreak of the Russo-Ottoman War of 1768-1774 to the signing of the Treaty of Hünkar Iskelesi in 1833. Building upon introductory chapters on the Russian-Ottoman Black Sea frontier and a case study of Bulgarian population movements between the Russian and Ottoman Empires, this dissertation analyzes Russian and Ottoman migration and settlement policies, the spread of epidemic diseases (plague and cholera) in the Black Sea region, the construction of quarantines and the implementation of travel document regimes. The role and position of the Danubian Principalities of Moldavia and Wallachia as the “middle ground” between the Ottoman and Russian Empires
    [Show full text]
  • A Short History of Egypt – to About 1970
    A Short History of Egypt – to about 1970 Foreword................................................................................................... 2 Chapter 1. Pre-Dynastic Times : Upper and Lower Egypt: The Unification. .. 3 Chapter 2. Chronology of the First Twelve Dynasties. ............................... 5 Chapter 3. The First and Second Dynasties (Archaic Egypt) ....................... 6 Chapter 4. The Third to the Sixth Dynasties (The Old Kingdom): The "Pyramid Age"..................................................................... 8 Chapter 5. The First Intermediate Period (Seventh to Tenth Dynasties)......10 Chapter 6. The Eleventh and Twelfth Dynasties (The Middle Kingdom).......11 Chapter 7. The Second Intermediate Period (about I780-1561 B.C.): The Hyksos. .............................................................................12 Chapter 8. The "New Kingdom" or "Empire" : Eighteenth to Twentieth Dynasties (c.1567-1085 B.C.)...............................................13 Chapter 9. The Decline of the Empire. ...................................................15 Chapter 10. Persian Rule (525-332 B.C.): Conquest by Alexander the Great. 17 Chapter 11. The Early Ptolemies: Alexandria. ...........................................18 Chapter 12. The Later Ptolemies: The Advent of Rome. .............................20 Chapter 13. Cleopatra...........................................................................21 Chapter 14. Egypt under the Roman, and then Byzantine, Empire: Christianity: The Coptic Church.............................................23
    [Show full text]
  • Political and Economic Transition of Ottoman Sovereignty from a Sole Monarch to Numerous Ottoman Elites, 1683–1750S
    Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hung. Volume 70 (1), 49 – 90 (2017) DOI: 10.1556/062.2017.70.1.4 POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC TRANSITION OF OTTOMAN SOVEREIGNTY FROM A SOLE MONARCH TO NUMEROUS OTTOMAN ELITES, 1683–1750S BIROL GÜNDOĞDU Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen Historisches Institut, Osteuropäische Geschichte Otto-Behaghel-Str. 10, Haus D Raum 205, 35394 Gießen, Deutschland e-mail: [email protected] The aim of this paper is to reveal the transformation of the Ottoman Empire following the debacles of the second siege of Vienna in 1683. The failures compelled the Ottoman state to change its socio- economic and political structure. As a result of this transition of the state structure, which brought about a so-called “redistribution of power” in the empire, new Ottoman elites emerged from 1683 until the 1750s. We have divided the above time span into three stages that will greatly help us com- prehend the Ottoman transition from sultanic authority to numerous autonomies of first Muslim, then non-Muslim elites of the Ottoman Empire. During the first period (1683–1699) we see the emergence of Muslim power players at the expense of sultanic authority. In the second stage (1699–1730) we observe the sultans’ unsuccessful attempts to revive their authority. In the third period (1730–1750) we witness the emergence of non-Muslim notables who gradually came into power with the help of both the sultans and external powers. At the end of this last stage, not only did the authority of Ottoman sultans decrease enormously, but a new era evolved where Muslim and non-Muslim leading figures both fought and co-operated with one another for a new distribution of wealth in the Ottoman Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Nostalgia
    Contemporary Nostalgia Edited by Niklas Salmose Printed Edition of the Special Issue Published in Humanities www.mdpi.com/journal/humanities Contemporary Nostalgia Contemporary Nostalgia Special Issue Editor Niklas Salmose MDPI • Basel • Beijing • Wuhan • Barcelona • Belgrade Special Issue Editor Niklas Salmose Linnaeus University Sweden Editorial Office MDPI St. Alban-Anlage 66 4052 Basel, Switzerland This is a reprint of articles from the Special Issue published online in the open access journal Humanities (ISSN 2076-0787) from 2018 to 2019 (available at: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/ humanities/special issues/Contemporary Nostalgia). For citation purposes, cite each article independently as indicated on the article page online and as indicated below: LastName, A.A.; LastName, B.B.; LastName, C.C. Article Title. Journal Name Year, Article Number, Page Range. ISBN 978-3-03921-556-0 (Pbk) ISBN 978-3-03921-557-7 (PDF) Cover image courtesy of Wikimedia user jarekt. Retrieved from https://commons.wikimedia.org/ wiki/File:Cass Scenic Railroad State Park - Shay 11 - 05.jpg. c 2019 by the authors. Articles in this book are Open Access and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which allows users to download, copy and build upon published articles, as long as the author and publisher are properly credited, which ensures maximum dissemination and a wider impact of our publications. The book as a whole is distributed by MDPI under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND. Contents About the Special Issue Editor ...................................... vii Niklas Salmose Nostalgia Makes Us All Tick: A Special Issue on Contemporary Nostalgia Reprinted from: Humanities 2019, 8, 144, doi:10.3390/h8030144 ...................
    [Show full text]