Conversations and Confrontations with My Reviewers

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Conversations and Confrontations with My Reviewers DEBATES & REJOINDERS Conversations and Confrontations with my Reviewers Archie Mafeje Department of Sociology American University in Cairo Egypt Point of Departure It is important for my readers to know that my monograph, as its title – Anthropology and Independent Africans – signifies, is directed to contemporary African anthropologists. This was in response to their representations in the 1991 anthropological seminar held in Dakar under the auspices of CODESRIA. It became apparent during the deliberations in the seminar that ‘African anthropology’ was an aspiration or wish rather than a reality. The attendant African anthropologists failed to provide a clear definition of ‘African anthropology’ as against colonial anthropology. Secondly, unlike colonial anthropology, they exhibited no theoretical framework, which guided their discourse, nor were they able to say what their designating categories and units of analysis were. All this can be verified by reading Anthropology in Africa which is an edited volume of the seminar papers (in press, Codesria Publications). This particular experience confirmed what I had suspected all along, namely the incorrigibility of colonial anthropology and, therefore, its likely atrophy in independent Africa. Then, the nagging question was: if an epistemological break from colonial anthropology had eluded African anthropologists due to certain objective conditions such as the transformation of actual or imagined ‘tribes’ and ideological/political imperatives of decolonisation, could somebody else do the job for them by rehabilitating colonial anthropology or by producing a new agenda for anthropology, without encountering, the traditional or proverbial Achille's heel of anthropology, namely, ‘alterity’? This was a pertinent concern, given the fact that ‘Anthropology in Africa’ could not necessarily be construed as ‘African anthropology’, irrespective of my immediate preoccupation, i.e., ‘anthropology by Africans’. Therefore, I had to satisfy myself that the epistemological problem facing, anthropology is not only a problem of Africans. It is an ontological problem in that it derives not simply from colonialism or imperialism, as Kathleen Gough believed, but from historically- determined white racism. This is the essence of ‘alterity’ and goes far beyond mere 95 Eurocentrism. To test the validity of this supposition, I made a strategic selection of texts which I thought had succeeded in confronting Eurocentrism in anthropology but failed to deracialise anthropology. The mistake I made in my monograph was not to make the above point explicit. It is apparent that while liberal Euro-American anthropologists and their kith and kin in the ex-colonies can consciously deconstruct colonial anthropology, it is doubtful if they can deracialise the original idea of anthropology as the study of the ‘other’. The authoritative remark by none other than Sally Falk Moore herself that: ‘From the start, the anthropological project was defined as the study of “others”, of non-European peoples with other ways of life’ (Moore 1994:9) confirms this supposition. Whether inspired by the lofty ideas of the Enlightenment (Firth 1972) or not, the search for exotica led to a situation wherein anthropology became a ‘scientific’ justification for drawing invidious distinction between Europeans and peoples of other continents. Under colonialism and white racial domination this had the most pernicious effects, as will be shown with reference to the intellectual role of white anthropologists in fostering ‘alterity’ in southern African settler-societies. Irrespective of whatever excuses individuals might make for themselves, the generic question is whether any anthropology founded on ‘alterity’ can escape being racist? Frequent references to ‘post-colonial’ research or ‘post-apartheid’ liberal reformism have not helped to clarify this issue. This need not concern Africans as victims of white racism about which they are still screaming, as the volume on Anthropology in Africa will testify. As the same volume will show, the problem facing contemporary African anthropologists is how to make an epistemological break from colonial anthropology, if at all. Points of Return I believe that my reviewers trivialised the problematique I wanted investigated and clarified for their own reasons – some predictable and some not so predictable. For instance, it is obvious that Sally Moore has too many axes to grind. I was actually puzzled by the fact that she found it necessary to re-introduce the specifics of our previous debate into the present one which is largely inspired by rejectionist texts or what she chooses to characterise as the ‘colonial period mentality’ critiques. However, it is possible that the earlier exchange left her with certain grievances which she found convenient to ventilate in the present context. Although my personal belief is that initiators of controversial debates should not reserve the right to be the final arbiters as well, I recognise the cathartic effect of unabated polemics. In her anger, indignation, and outrage she has revealed things which otherwise would have never known. One of these is to discover that she is capable of descending from her Olympian tower and engage in the rough and tumble of our kind of world. To make sure that this is for real, she takes leave of her genteel style of writing and becomes visceral to the point of being vitriolic and not disdaining use of exclamation marks to derive extra emotive impact where words prove inadequate. Not only this but she found it necessary to clear herself by declaring her political credentials, namely, that she was supportive of 96 African ‘independence’ and that she took an academic interest in Julius Nyerere’s ‘socialist, planned-economy path’. Regarding the former, her reference is her encounters with African students in the African Studies Centre at UCLA in the 1960s. It so happens that in the summer of 1965 I was guest lecturer in the Centre at the invitation of James Coleman (the Africanist king-maker). It was an opportune moment for me because it coincided with the climax of the Civil Rights movement in the United States. In my lectures African- American and African students lost no opportunity to air their grievances against racism in democratic America where slaves had been emancipated long ago about how African Studies were being taught in the USA. Worse still, the Watts riots exploded while I was still in Los Angeles and I had the fortune of being escorted by Mrs. Nat King Cole to see the disparity between white and black Los Angeles. As if this was not enough, during my lengthy discussions with Dan Kunene, an African linguist who had been recruited from the University of Cape Town, I learnt that a number of faculty members in the African Studies Centre were advisers to the State Department and that some of the Chairs in African languages were funded by the same Department and even by the American Navy – something, which led to the early departure of A. C. Jordan from UCLA in protest. Could all this have been unknown to somebody who became ‘closely involved with the activities of the African Studies Centre at UCLA’? Is Sally Moore after all these years deluding herself or trying to delude us? Whatever is the answer, it is significant that thirty years hence Mahmood Mamdani could allude to the same underlying contradictions in his stirring critique, ‘A Glimpse at African Studies, Made in USA’ (1990). Moore’s second claim to legitimacy is her field trip to Tanzania. She mentions the advice she got front the two historians, Ranger and Kimambo, but fails to report on the unnamed professor of anthropology who warned her that people in Kilimanjaro ‘wore trousers’, meaning that they were not suitable objects for an anthropological study. This as it may, what is important to bear in mind is that even if her book became famous in America, it remained obscure in East Africa. Interestingly enough, what emerged as relevant and often-quoted texts on customary tenure laws in East Africa in the last 20 years is the work of our former students from the University of Dar-es- Salaam, notably, Okot Ogendo, Pale Acholi, and more recently Issa Shivji. This is of more than academic import and might contradict her claim to legitimacy in the same way that her association with the African Studies Centre in UCLA did not transform her commitment to ‘alterity’, if not imperialism. As far as access to literature is concerned, I am sure, I am as privileged as any professor at Harvard simply because I am a regular visitor to all centres of western civilisation. In addition, I receive frequent review copies from publishers on Africa. Above all, the CODESRIA secretariat and other members of the network bring to my attention whatever they consider to be interesting/relevant latest publications on Africa, 97 irrespective of discipline. However, like Sally Moore, I have to ‘make choices’ in dealing with literature. She made the foregoing remark in response to the charge that she wrote her book, Anthropology and Africa (1994), without referring, to any of the writings by African anthropologists. This was a serious but deliberate omission on Sally Moore’s part. As she made it known to one of her colleagues who queried the omission, in her view certain things are understood, without having to be said. Sally Moore has no respect for or faith in African scholarship thus far. Naturally, she would deny this but, unfortunately, I cannot reveal the identity of her white colleagues with whom she feels free to express such prejudices. Therefore, her having discovered all of a sudden that there are African scholars such as Thandika Mkandawire who are capable of writing ‘subtle’ texts is open to suspicion. I am sure, she is not at all familiar with Thandika Mkandawire’s work since he joined CODESRIA about 20 years ago. Consequently, she might have used his name in vain, as the brewing debate between him and some of his African colleagues such as Kwesi Prah will show.
Recommended publications
  • Lessons from Burkina Faso's Thomas Sankara By
    Pan-Africanism and African Renaissance in Contemporary Africa: Lessons from Burkina Faso’s Thomas Sankara By: Moorosi Leshoele (45775389) Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy At the UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA SUPERVISOR: Prof Vusi Gumede (September 2019) DECLARATION (Signed) i | P a g e DEDICATION I dedicate this thesis to Thomas Noel Isadore Sankara himself, one of the most underrated leaders in Africa and the world at large, who undoubtedly stands shoulder to shoulder with ANY leader in the world, and tall amongst all of the highly revered and celebrated revolutionaries in modern history. I also dedicate this to Mariam Sankara, Thomas Sankara’s wife, for not giving up on the long and hard fight of ensuring that justice is served for Sankara’s death, and that those who were responsible, directly or indirectly, are brought to book. I also would like to tremendously thank and dedicate this thesis to Blandine Sankara and Valintin Sankara for affording me the time to talk to them at Sankara’s modest house in Ouagadougou, and for sharing those heart-warming and painful memories of Sankara with me. For that, I say, Merci boucop. Lastly, I dedicate this to my late father, ntate Pule Leshoele and my mother, Mme Malimpho Leshoele, for their enduring sacrifices for us, their children. ii | P a g e AKNOWLEDGEMENTS To begin with, my sincere gratitude goes to my Supervisor, Professor Vusi Gumede, for cunningly nudging me to enrol for doctoral studies at the time when the thought was not even in my radar.
    [Show full text]
  • CB 3 4 Engl Samedi 1.Pmd
    CODESRIA Bulletin, Nos 3 & 4, 2008 Page 1 Editorial A Giant Has Moved On This 12th General Assembly is taking place exactly one year and Sociology Department at the University of Dar Es Salaam, Tan- nine months after the death of an illustrious member of zania before moving to The Hague as a Visiting Professor of CODESRIA, one most committed to the problematic of the pub- Social Anthropology of Development and Chairman of the Ru- lic sphere in Africa. Wednesday 28 March 2007 will go down as ral Development, Urban Development and Labour Studies a sad day among social researchers all over Africa and beyond. Programme at the Institute of Social Studies from 1972 to 1975. It was the day Professor Archibald Monwabisi Mafeje (fondly It was here that he met his wife and life-long companion, the known among friends, colleagues and admirers as Archie) passed Egyptian scholar and activist, Dr Shahida El Baz. In 1979, he away in Pretoria, in what was a most quiet exit that has left very joined the American University, in Cairo, as Professor of Sociol- many of us whom he touched directly or indirectly, in a state of ogy. Thereafter, he took up the post of Professor of Sociology sadness and anger. and Anthropology and Director of the Multidisciplinary Re- search Centre at the University of Namibia from 1992 to 1994. Archie Mafeje, the quintessential personality of science and Mafeje was also a senior fellow and visiting or guest professor one of the most versatile, extraordinary minds to emerge from at several other universities and research institutions in Africa, Africa was, in his days, a living legend in every sense.
    [Show full text]
  • BR-Beyond the Color Line
    Kwesi Kwaa Prah. Beyond The Color Line: Pan-Africanist Disputations Selected Sketches, Letters, Papers And Reviews. Africa World Press, Inc., 1998, 188pp Kwesi Prah's book entitled Beyond the Color Line: Pan-Africanist Disputations: Selected Sketches, Letters, Papers and Reviews, accurately captures the contents of the book, which is largely a compendium of his Pan-Africanist philosophy and how it has shaped his life and scholarship over time. To begin, Prah provides a bio-sketch of his impressive background which includes his secondary education at the well-known Achimota School during which the struggle for Ghana's independence was underway. At a tender age of 25, while a student in Amsterdam he provided a space in his house for "the Medical Committee Angola which was supplying medicines for the Popular Movement for the Liberation of Angola (MPLN'(xii). While a lecturer at Heidelberg University in the late 1960s, Prah was elected the Secretary General of Ghana National Students Organization. Thereafter, he returned to Accra where he provided resources for displaced Zimbabwe children and South West Africa Peoples Organization (SWAPO). In the mid 1970s he accepted teaching positions at the University of Zambia, Juba University, Sudan and University of Botswana where he taught and operated underground in various activities in support of African resistance in South Africa. Like Du Bois, Makonnen, Nkrumah, Padmore among others whom Prah very deeply admired, he has devoted his entire life for African emancipation both on the continent and in the diaspora. He has also shown an active concern for the emancipation of other repressed people in Asia and South America.
    [Show full text]
  • The Inventions of African Identities and Languages: the Discursive and Developmental Implications
    The Inventions of African Identities and Languages: The Discursive and Developmental Implications Paul Tiyambe Zeleza Pennsylvania State University 1. Introduction African identities, like African languages, are inventions, mutually constitutive existential and epistemic constructions. Invention implies a history, a social process; it denaturalizes cultural artifacts and practices, stripping them of primordial authenticity and essentialism. This is predictable coming from a historian, a field that investigates and invests the past with meaning, seeks to unravel the complex and often contradictory ebbs and flows of human institutions, inventions, ideas, and imaginations, in which change, often messy and unpredictable in its causes and consequences, is the only constant. Flagging my disciplinary affiliation is another way of trying to save myself from embarrassment in this gathering of eminent linguists, to tell you that while I know something about history, I know very little about linguistics, so you will have to forgive my uninformed remarks. I have entitled my talk “The Invention of African Identities and Languages: The Discursive and Developmental Implications.” I will begin by discussing the challenges of defining “Africa” because that affects, in considerable measure, how we identify and analyze African identities and languages, which in turn, has discursive and developmental implications. The term “invention” has become rather ubiquitous in African studies ever since the publication of Mudimbe's renowned book, The Invention of Africa.1 For us historians, the signal intervention came with Terence Ranger’s influential essay, “The Invention of Tradition in Colonial Africa.”2 The advent of the “posts”—postmodernism, poststructuralism, and postcoloniality—further reinforced the constructivist view of social processes and practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Pan-Africanismo E Marxismo: Aproximações E Diferenças a Partir Do Pensamento Africano Contemporâneo
    Pan-africanismo e marxismo: aproximações e diferenças a partir do pensamento africano contemporâneo Muryatan S. Barbosa1 60 Resumo A partir de uma análise da história das ideias, este ensaio visa investigar a aproximações e distanciamentos entre o pan-africanismo e o marxismo no pensamento intelectual africano contemporâneo. Para isto, pontua continuidades e descontinuidades essenciais desta relação, a partir da investigação de trajetórias intelectuais e contextos históricos específicos. Por fim, reflete sobre a possível atualidade de tais tradições críticas, tendo em conta a análise previamente estabelecida. Palavras-chave: pan-africanismo; marxismo; pensamento intelectual africano. Resumen Abstract A partir de un análisis de la historia de las Based on an analysis of the history of ideas, this ideas, este ensayo tiene como objetivo investigar essay aims to investigate the similarities and las aproximaciones y distanciamientos entre el distances between Pan-Africanism and Marxism in panafricanismo y el marxismo en el pensamiento contemporary African intellectual thought. For intelectual africano contemporáneo. Para ello, that, it points out essential continuities and señala continuidades y discontinuidades esenciales discontinuities of this relationship, from the de esta relación, a partir de la investigación de investigation of intellectual trajectories and trayectorias intelectuales y contextos históricos specific historical contexts. Finally, it reflects on específicos. Finalmente, reflexiona sobre la posible the possible relevance
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical Analysis of the Mytho-Reality Complexity of the Azanian Nation
    Azanism: A Critical Analysis of the Mytho-Reality Complexity of the Azanian Nation Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades an der Fakultaet Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, Fachbereich Sozialwissenschaften der Universitaet Hamburg Vorgelegt von: Raul Guevara Diaz October 2009 Angaben der Gutachter Erste Gutachter: Zweitgutachterin Professor Dr. Cord Jakobeit Prof. Dr. Marienne Pieper Institut fuer Politikwissenschaft, Institut fuer Soziologie, Allende-Platz 1, Allende-Platz 1, 20146 Hamburg, 20146 Hamburg, Deutschland Deutschland Datum der letztzen muendlichen Pruefung 19 Mai, 2011 1 I. INTRODUCTION Substantial amount of academic literature in the field of social sciences (specialized in ethnic and nationalist politics) has dealt considerably with both the colonial and post-colonial aspects of the social and political history of Africa, and undeniably the conventional wisdom about Africa‘s political landscape should be best characterized as enduring instability. Two main factors, namely the role of colonialism and the [supposed] heterogeneity of the society, are considered crucial to explaining such a disturbing socio-political scenario. As would be expected most concern scholars and authors in this field have dealt with the general political situation in Africa within the modern paradigm of territorial nation-states. In other words, most theories of ethnic and nationalist politics have dealt with Africa‘s political instability within the formal context of the national state system (or statism). Even those who have attempted to explore the possibility of an integrated or homogeneous social growth or identity formation prior to indigenous Africans encounter with colonialism have often done so within that modern paradigm of statism. Hence, unsurprisingly, conventional wisdom espoused specifically by agents of colonialism/pseudo-nationalism tends to consider Africa‘s different dialects or linguistic groups as constituting ethnic and/or national categories in their own right.
    [Show full text]
  • The African E-Journals Project Has Digitized Full Text of Articles of Eleven Social Science and Humanities Journals
    The African e-Journals Project has digitized full text of articles of eleven social science and humanities journals. This item is from the digital archive maintained by Michigan State University Library. Find more at: http://digital.lib.msu.edu/projects/africanjournals/ Available through a partnership with Scroll down to read the article. Afr.j.polit. sci. (2001) Vol. 6, No. 2,11-27 The African Renaissance in the Age of Globalization Dani W. Nabudere* Abstract The article seeks to examine the ambiguities and ambivalence of the concept of African renaissance. It situates the roots of the African renaissance in the cultural component, which challenges the right of Europeans to impose their cultural- spiritual values on African communities. This cultural project is traced from the early-fifteenth century when Europe sought to make Christianity a universal religion and in order to contain Islam, African religions and the Asian belief system. It is argued that the concept is a useful tool in the struggle of the African people to redefine a new political and ideological agenda of pan-Africanism in the age of globalization. The key pillars of the African renaissance are socio-cultural, political, economic regenerationandimprovementofAfrica's geo-political standing in world affairs. Introduction We live in an age of turbulence and rapid technological transformation which affects social life in new ways. This technologically and information propelled transformations dubbed "globalization" is causing conflicts, wars and social disintegration in almost all the countries of the world. It is also leading to the construction of new identities and the reinvention of old ones.
    [Show full text]
  • Pan-Africanism/African Nationalism
    Pan-Africanism/African Nationalism PAN-AFRICANISM AFRICAN NATIONALISM Strengthening the Unity of Africa and its Diaspora Edited by B.F. Bankie & K. Mchombu The Red Sea Press, Inc. Publishers & Distributors of Third World Books P. O. Box 1892 RSP P. O. Box 48 Trenton, NJ 08607 Asmara, ERITREA The Red Sea Press, Inc. Publishers & Distributors of Third World Books P. O. Box 1892 RSP P. O. Box 48 Trenton, NJ 08607 Asmara, ERITREA Copyright © 2008 B.F. Bankie & K. Mchombu First Africa World Press Edition 2008 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechani- cal, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of the publisher. Book and cover design: Saverance Publishing Services (www.saverancepublishing.com) Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data All African Students’ Conference (17th : 2005 : Windhoek, Namibia) Pan-Africanism/African nationalism : strengthening the unity of Africa and its diaspora / edited by B.F. Bankie & K. Mchombu. -- 2nd ed. p. cm. Rev. ed. of: Pan-Africanism. 2006. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-56902-297-6 (hardcover) -- ISBN 1-56902-298-4 (pbk.) 1. Pan-Africanism--Congresses. 2. African diaspora--Congresses. I. Bankie, B. F. II. Mchombu, K. J. (Kingo J.) III. All African Students’ Con- ference (17th : 2005 : Windhoek, Namibia). Pan-Africanism. IV. Title. DT30.5.A48 2005a 320.54096--dc22 2008022490 TABLE OF CONTENts PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION | B. F. Bankie ix DEDICATION TO JOHN GARANG DE MABIOR | Dani Wadada Nabudere xi FOREWORD | Kwesi Kwaa Prah xxix Conference Opening Session 1 Opening Remarks | Elaine Trepper 3 Welcoming Address | Lazarus Hangula 5 Statement | C.
    [Show full text]
  • Educational Change and Cultural Politics: National Identity- Formation in Zimbabwe
    EDUCATIONAL CHANGE AND CULTURAL POLITICS: NATIONAL IDENTITY- FORMATION IN ZIMBABWE A Dissertation presented to the faculty of the College of Education of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Douglas Mpondi March 2004 This dissertation entitled EDUCATIONAL CHANGE AND CULTURAL POLITICS: NATIONAL IDENTITY- FORMATION IN ZIMBABWE BY DOUGLAS MPONDI has been approved for the Department of Educational Studies and the College of Education by W.S. Howard Professor of Educational Studies James Heap Dean, College of Education, Ohio University Abstract MPONDI, DOUGLAS PH.D March 2004. Cultural Studies Educational change and cultural politics: national identity-formation in Zimbabwe (240pages) Director of Dissertation: Stephen Howard The study investigates how the post-independent government of Zimbabwe, as seen through the lens of its cultural critics, used the institution of education as a focal point for nation-building and social transformation. The project examines how critics respond to the use of educational change as a way of political legitimization. Whilst a number of scholars have focused on post-colonial Zimbabwe during the post-1980 period, they did not have the chance to study it during the post-2000 era, which was a critical and dramatic historical juncture because of the turmoil and a reversal trend of the promises that were made at independence. The qualitative research approach was formulated to collect data on education and language policy, politics and culture from a cross-section of people of the Zimbabwean society. Brief case study interviews were conducted to provide newer and richer details on Zimbabwean cultural landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • An Afrocentric Philosophical Enquiry
    Afrikan Contribution to International Relations Theory: An Afrocentric Philosophical Enquiry by Tshepo Mvulane Moloi [email protected] South Afrikan Association of Political Science Convenor of Afrikan Political Caucus D.Litt. et Phil Candidate in Politics and International Relations University of Johannesburg The following is an edited version of a dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Arts at the University of Zululand in May 2012, in partial fulfillment for the degree of Master of Arts in Systematic Philosophy in the Department of Philosophy (the supervisor was Dr. Mojalefa Lehlohonolo Johannes Koenane KwaDlangezwa). Dedication This study is dedicated to my parents Dr. Nombuyiselo Hilda Mvulane and Mr. Mark Anthony Lepoma Moloi. To Dr. Nombuyiselo Hilda Mvulane (my mother). I remain humbled and grateful for your endless love, care and eternal support. I cannot ever proceed to take, any of my personal achievements, without always keeping in mind, that as a single parent, you have outstandingly played both roles of being a mother and a father to me. With that in mind all my so called overall achievements thus far, are equally ours. This thesis is as much of your creation, as it was mine. Ihlile ke nako ya rona mme, habashwe! Malibongwe igama lamakhosikazi, maqhawekazi ethu. I wish here to make mention that indeed, it is true that “it takes a whole village to grow a child”. As said in Mazimbu, Tanzania (the country where this iconic lady gave birth to me) in Kiswahili: Asante Sana. To all my mother’s family shukran (in Arabic
    [Show full text]
  • For Daouda Bulletin 1&2, 2011.Pmd
    CODESRIA Bulletin, Nos 1 & 2, 2011 Page 1 Editorial Africa and the Challenges of the Second Decade of the 21st Century: Constraints and Opportunities The year 2011 is the year of the 13th General Assembly of in Africa’ – the umbrella theme of the 2007-2011 CODESRIA CODESRIA. The General Assembly is the highest governing Strategic Plan. The theme that the Executive Committee has organ of CODESRIA. It is the body that makes the most important chosen for the scientific conference of the 13th General Assem- policy decisions of the Council, elects the Executive Committee, bly, which is “Africa and the Challenges of the 21st Century”, and elects the President and the Vice President of CODESRIA. paying particular attention to the constraints facing, and op- In the 38 years of its existence, CODESRIA has had 12 Presidents portunities available to our continent, should enable us to har- and the succession from Executive Committee to the other, and ness and bring the precious insights and achievements of the from one president to the next have been very smooth. last five years and, indeed, the formidable progress made by The General Assembly is coupled with a scientific conference the social sciences over the years to address old and new chal- which provides the African social science research community lenges facing Africa and the world. with a great opportunity to reflect on the challenges facing our The holding of the 13th General Assembly coincides with the continent and on the ways in which the social sciences are 50th anniversary of the pan African conference held in Casa- addressing those challenges, paying particular attention to blanca in 1961 that was attended by Kwame Nkrumah, Gamal CODESRIA’s own role.
    [Show full text]
  • JOURNAL of MARXISM-NKRUMAISM Issues of Pan-Africanism and Building the Socialist Mode of Production
    JOURNAL OF MARXISM-NKRUMAISM Issues of Pan-Africanism and Building the Socialist Mode of Production The Annual Theoretical Organ of the Centre for Consciencist Studies and Analyses (CENCSA) Vol. 1 No. 1 December 31, 2014 EDITORIAL Liberty Ayivi Memorial Mango Plantation (LAMMP) On Building Socialist Power In our next issue Hitherto, the pursuit of socialism has essentially been at the political level, to begin with. This stands in contrast to the laws governing the evolution and emergence of new modes of production in dominance within the historical process. History attests to the fact of newly emerging socio-economic systems (modes of production) being evolved, upheld, promoted and defended by emergent economically powerful class forces. The attraction of the new mode of production in assuring immediate and future livelihood in prosperity and happiness has always been its source of inexorable growth and development. Political and other superstructural CONTENTS institutions of power, attendant upon such economic systems to defend them, are a consequence of the process of economic Our Stance evolution but never ever their cause. The attempts at a Here We Are reversed process have generally failed. The laws governing Ideological Determinations this process of history are never reversed. The poor do not Dr. Kwame Nkrumah on Religion and Atheism come to rule their lives until and unless they create for On the Democratic Revolution within the African themselves an economic system in which they are the Revolution powerful. Yes, until and unless the working people build for themselves the socialist mode of production in superiority A Course in Marxism-Nkrumaism over the capitalist and neo-colonial system the attainment of Introductory Welcome Discourse socialism as a socio-economico-political system shall remain elusive.
    [Show full text]