DOCSLIB.ORG

Shoreline Analysis Report Describes Existing Conditions and Characterizes Ecological Functions in the Shoreline Jurisdiction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Shoreline Analysis Report Describes Existing Conditions and Characterizes Ecological Functions in the Shoreline Jurisdiction The Watershed Company May 2015 S HORELINE A NALYSIS R EPORT PACIFIC COUNTY 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background and Purpose Pacific County (County) obtained a grant from the Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) in 2014 to complete a comprehensive update of its Shoreline Master Program (SMP). One of the first steps of the update process is to inventory and characterize the County’s shorelines as defined by the state’s Shoreline Management Act (SMA) of 1971 (RCW 90.58). This analysis was conducted in accordance with the SMP Guidelines (Guidelines, Chapter 173- 26 Washington Administrative Code (WAC)) and project Scope of Work promulgated by Ecology, and includes all unincorporated areas within the County. Under these Guidelines, the County must identify and assemble the most current, applicable, accurate and complete scientific and technical information available. This Shoreline Analysis Report describes existing conditions and characterizes ecological functions in the shoreline jurisdiction. This assessment of current conditions will serve as the baseline against which the impacts of future development actions in shoreline jurisdiction will be measured. The Guidelines require that the County demonstrates that its updated SMP yields “no net loss” in shoreline ecological functions relative to the baseline (current condition). The no net loss requirement is a new standard in the Guidelines that is intended to be used by local jurisdictions to test whether the updated SMP will in fact accomplish the SMA objective of protecting ecological functions. 1.2 Shoreline Jurisdiction As defined by the SMA, shorelines include certain waters of the state plus their associated “shorelands.” At a minimum, the waterbodies designated as shorelines of the state are streams whose mean annual flow is 20 cubic feet per second (cfs) or greater, lakes whose area is greater than 20 acres, and all marine waters extending three miles offshore. Shorelands are defined as: “those lands extending landward for 200 feet in all directions as measured on a horizontal plane from the ordinary high water mark; floodways and contiguous 1 Pacific County Shoreline Analysis Report floodplain areas landward 200 feet from such floodways; and all wetlands and river deltas associated with the streams, lakes, and tidal waters which are subject to the provisions of this chapter…Any county or city may determine that portion of a one- hundred-year-floodplain to be included in its master program as long as such portion includes, as a minimum, the floodway and the adjacent land extending landward two hundred feet therefrom… Any city or county may also include in its master program land necessary for buffers for critical areas (RCW 90.58.030).” Figure 1-1 provides a diagram conveying the extent of shoreline jurisdiction. 3 1 5 2 4 1. Shoreline-associated wetland located entirely within 200 feet from the OHWM 2. Shoreline-associated wetland located partially within 200 feet from the OHWM 3. Shoreline-associated wetland located beyond 200 feet from the OHWM, but within the 100-year floodplain 4. Shoreline-associated wetland that is beyond 200 feet from the OHWM and outside of the 100- year floodplain, but that is hydrologically connected a shoreline waterbody 5. Wetland that is not considered part of shoreline jurisdiction because it is beyond 200 feet from the OHWM, outside of the 100-year floodplain, and not hydrologically connected to a shoreline waterbody Figure 1-1. Diagram showing areas within shoreline jurisdiction Source: Ecology The ordinary high water mark (OHWM) is: “that mark that will be found by examining the bed and banks and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual, and so long continued in all 2 The Watershed Company May 2015 ordinary years, as to mark upon the soil a character distinct from that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation as that condition exists on June 1, 1971, as it may naturally change thereafter, or as it may change thereafter in accordance with permits issued by a local government or the department: PROVIDED, That in any area where the ordinary high water mark cannot be found, the ordinary high water mark adjoining salt water shall be the line of mean higher high tide and the ordinary high water mark adjoining fresh water shall be the line of mean high water” (RCW 90.58.030(2)(c)). A detailed description of the methods used to depict shoreline jurisdiction is included in Appendix A. The SMA sets specific preferences for uses and calls for a higher level of effort in implementing its objectives along designated Shorelines of Statewide Significance, these preferences are detailed in Section 4.3.2. All streams and rivers that have mean annual flow of 1,000 cfs or greater are considered Shorelines of Statewide Significance, along with their associated uplands. Within Pacific County’s jurisdiction, the following waterbodies qualify as Shorelines of Statewide Significance (Figure 1-2). • Columbia River • North River • Willapa River downstream from the confluence with the South Fork Willapa River • All areas seaward of the OHWM along the Pacific Ocean coastline, including harbors, bays, estuaries, and inlets, and all shorelands associated with these waters are also considered Shorelines of Statewide Significance Pacific County does not have any lakes greater than 1,000 acres which would thereby qualify as a Shoreline of Statewide Significance. 3 Pacific County Shoreline Analysis Report Figure 1-2. Map of Pacific County showing all Shorelines of the State (regulated shorelines) and Shorelines of Statewide Significance 1.3 Study Area The study area for this report includes all unincorporated land within the County’s proposed shoreline jurisdiction. Further, the study area includes relevant discussion of the contributing watersheds. 4 The Watershed Company May 2015 Pacific County encompasses 1,223 square miles. The County is bordered to the south by the Columbia River, to the southeast by Wahkiakum County, to the east by Lewis County, and to the north by Grays Harbor County. The County is bordered to the west by the Pacific Ocean. The County is predominantly rural in nature, with unincorporated areas making up most of the land area. Incorporated areas of the County include the cities of South Bend, Raymond, Long Beach, and Ilwaco. Pacific County is home to the Shoalwater Bay Indian Tribe. The Long Beach Peninsula was also once home to the Chinook Indian Tribe, the federal recognition of which is still pending (History Link, electronic reference). Federal and State lands make up nearly 4 percent and 12 percent of the total shoreland area, respectively. Federal lands occur in the Willapa National Wildlife Refuge (NWR). Federal lands on which shoreline waterbodies lie are included in this report, but discussion is more limited because the future SMP will only pertain to actions undertaken by non-federal parties on those lands. This generally occurs when a federal agency leases lands to a private party, such as forest tract leases on lands in a National Forest. 2 SUMMARY OF CURRENT REGULATORY FRAMEWORK 2.1 Shoreline Management Act The SMA promotes planning along shorelines and coordination among governments. The legislative findings and policy intent of the SMA states: “There is, therefore, a clear and urgent demand for a planned, rational, and concerted effort, jointly performed by federal, state, and local governments, to prevent the inherent harm in an uncoordinated and piecemeal development of the state's shorelines (RCW 90.58.020).” While protecting shoreline resources by regulating development, the SMA is also intended to provide balance by encouraging water-dependent or water-oriented uses while also conserving or enhancing shoreline ecological functions and values. SMPs must be based on state guidelines, but should be tailored to the specific conditions and needs of the local community. 2.2 Pacific County Shoreline Master Program Pacific County adopted its existing SMP in 2000. 5 Pacific County Shoreline Analysis Report Shoreline uses, developments, and activities are also subject to the County’s Comprehensive Plan, County Code, and various other provisions of County, State and federal laws. Each incorporated City in the County is in the process of its own individual SMP update. Existing Pacific County Shoreline Master Program Designations The current SMP designations for Pacific County include the four designations included in Ecology’s 1971 Final Guidelines. These designations include: Natural: “relatively free of human influence… Any activity which would change… the existing situation would be desirable only if such a change would contribute to the preservation of the existing character. The primary determinant for designating an area as a natural environment is the… presence of some unique natural or cultural features considered valuable in their natural or original condition which (is) relatively intolerant of intensive human use.” Conservancy: resources and valuable historic and cultural areas in order to ensure a continuous flow of recreational benefits to the public and to achieve sustained resources utilization… examples of use that might be predominant in a conservancy environment include diffuse outdoor recreation activities, timber harvesting on a sustained-yield basis, passive agricultural uses such as pasture and range… conservancy would also be the most suitable designation for those areas which present too severe biophysical limitations to be designated rural or urban…” Rural: “to protect
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2019 Oregon Administrative Rules Compilation
    2019 OREGON ADMINISTRATIVE RULES COMPILATION CHAPTER 736 Parks and Recreation Department Published By DENNIS RICHARDSON Secretary of State Copyright 2019 Office of the Secretary of State Rules effective as of January 01, 2019 DIVISION 1 PROCEDURAL RULES 736-001-0000 Notice of Proposed Rules 736-001-0005 Model Rules of Procedure 736-001-0030 Fees for Public Records DIVISION 2 ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIVITIES 736-002-0010 State Park Cooperating Associations 736-002-0015 Working with Donor Organizations 736-002-0020 Criminal Records Checks 736-002-0030 Definitions 736-002-0038 Designated Positions: Authorized Designee and Contact Person 736-002-0042 Criminal Records Check Process 736-002-0050 Preliminary Fitness Determination. 736-002-0052 Hiring or Appointing on a Preliminary Basis 736-002-0058 Final Fitness Determination 736-002-0070 Crimes Considered 736-002-0102 Appealing a Fitness Determination 736-002-0150 Recordkeeping, Confidentiality, and Retention 736-002-0160 Fees DIVISION 3 WILLAMETTE RIVER GREENWAY PLAN 736-003-0005 Willamette River Greenway Plan DIVISION 4 DISTRIBUTION OF ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLE FUNDSTO PUBLIC AND PRIVATELY OWNED LANDMANAGERS, ATV CLUBS AND ORGANIZATIONS 736-004-0005 Purpose of Rule 736-004-0010 Statutory Authority 736-004-0015 Definitions 736-004-0020 ATV Grant Program: Apportionment of Monies 736-004-0025 Grant Application Eligibility and Requirements 736-004-0030 Project Administration 736-004-0035 Establishment of the ATV Advisory Committee 736-004-0045 ATV Operating Permit Agent Application and Privileges 736-004-0060
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Program Chair
    Science Program 44th Annual Meeting of the Pacific Seabird Group 22-25 February, 2017 Daily Schedule Overview Tacoma Convention Center (TCC) Comments or questions, please contact Local Committee: [email protected] Tuesday, 21 February 2017 (pre-conference) Hotel Murano, Lido Boardroom 1300-1700 Short-tailed Albatross Recovery Team (START) Meeting – by invitation Wednesday, 22 February 2017 0730–1700 REGISTRATION DESK OPEN (TCC Lobby) Committee Meetings – all welcome, unless otherwise indicated. Boardroom N, Ballroom AB, Boardroom S, Commencement Bay N, 1 TCC TCC TCC CUW Aleutian Tern Tech 0900-1230 EXCO MAMU Tech Comm TUPU Tech Comm Comm 1230-1300 BREAK Seabird Monitoring SCMU and GUMU Tech 1300-1500 EXCO MAMU Tech Comm Comm Comm FWS Pacific Seabird SCMU and GUMU Tech 1500-1700 EXCO MAMU Tech Comm Program Comm 1700-1830 KIMU Tech Comm 1800-2100 WELCOME RECEPTION (Hotel Murano, Venice Ballroom) 1 Center for Urban Waters (CUW), 326 East D St. Tacoma WA 98421. https://www.urbanwaters.org 1 Thursday, 23 February 2017 0730–1700 REGISTRATION DESK OPEN (TCC Lobby) Ballroom AB Meeting Room 315 Meeting Room 316 0830-0900 Welcome and Opening Remarks PLENARY: P. Dee Boersma (Ballroom AB) 0900-1000 Natural History and Long-Term Studies Are Fundamental to Science 1000-1030 Coffee Break SPS 2: Sound to Sea: 1030-1200 Marine Birds Across the Population Biology Tools and Techniques Salish Sea Lunch (on your own) and Meetings 1200-1330 NOAA Fisheries Seabird Workgroup (1200, Boardroom N) – by invitation Former Chairs Meeting (1215-1320,
    [Show full text]
  • Chehalis River Basin Flood Damage Reduction Project NEPA Environmental Impact Statement
    Appendix C References Cited in the Environmental Impact Statement September 2020 Chehalis River Basin Flood Damage Reduction Project NEPA Environmental Impact Statement APPENDIX C: REFERENCES CITED IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Chapter 1, Introduction CEQ (Council on Environmental Quality), 1999. Memorandum from: George T. Frampton, Jr., Acting Chair, to: Heads of Federal Agencies. Regarding: Designation of Non-Federal Agencies to be Cooperating Agencies in Implementing the Procedural Requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act. July 28, 1999. Corps (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers), 2018. Memorandum for the Record. Regarding: Determination of the Requirement for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Chehalis River Basin Dam Proposal. January 31, 2018. Corps, 2019. Chehalis River Basin Flood Damage Reduction NEPA EIS Scoping Summary Report. January 2019. CRBFA (Chehalis River Basin Flood Authority), 2019. Flood Authority Master Contact List 5-15-2019. Last modified May 15, 2019. Accessed July 27, 2020. Accessed at: https://www.ezview.wa.gov/Portals/_1492/images/Updated%20-- %20Flood%20Authority%20Contact%20Sheet%20--%205-15-2019.pdf. Work Group (Governor’s Chehalis Basin Work Group), 2018. Letter to: Jay Inslee, Office of the Governor. Regarding: Chehalis Basin Board’s Capital Budget Recommendation for 2019-2021. November 26, 2018. Chapter 2, Purpose and Need CBP (Chehalis Basin Partnership), 2004. Chehalis Basin Watershed Management Plan. Accessed at: http://chehalisbasinpartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/cbp_wmp.pdf. NFIP (National Flood Insurance Program), 2015. Loss Statistics from January 1, 1978 to July 31, 2015. Updated July 2015; accessed October 2, 2015. Accessed at: http://bsa.nfipstat.fema.gov/reports/1040.htm.
    [Show full text]
  • Southwest Washington Tour When You Think About the Terrific Golf in the Pacific Northwest, Southwest Washington Is a Big Part of It
    SepTeMber 2013 SouThWeST WaShIngTon Where you can play golf More than just golf to do in Southwest Washington in the SW Washington area SW Washington is a vast area There are plenty of options off the with a lot of golf courses, including golf course when visiting SW Wash- Green Mountain (right). Take a look ington, including windsurfing on the where to tee it up when you are in Columbia River. For more, please see the area. See Page 3 for the map. inside this section. Freeway golf: I-5 is loaded In Southwest Washington, there is no shortage of golf along Inter- state-5 as you drive between Olympia and Vancouver, in fact one course you can see from the freeway is Tri Moun- tain in Ridgefield (right), which has views of three different mountains. Another popular choice for freeway golfers is the Home Course (far right) in DuPont, which helped host the 2010 US Amateur. For more, see Page 2 of this section of Inside Golf. Southwest Washington Tour When you think about the terrific golf in the Pacific Northwest, Southwest Washington is a big part of it. The area is loaded with golf and offers a wide variety of courses to choose from. The Southwest Washington region stretches from Olympia west to the Pacific Ocean and south to the city of Vancouver. With some of the Pacific Northwest’s top public courses located in Southwest Washington, golf has proven to be a popular attraction. From places like Tumwater (left) to Elk Ridge Golf Course (below) at Carson Hot Springs in White Salmon, finding good golf is never a problem.
    [Show full text]
  • Grays Harbor Juvenile Fish Use Assessment: 2012 Annual Report
    Grays Harbor Juvenile Fish Use Assessment: 2012 Annual Report Prepared for the Chehalis Basin Habitat Work Group February, 2013 Prepared by: Todd Sandell, James Fletcher, Andrew McAninch and Micah Wait Setting the net in Half Moon Bay, Grays Harbor Estuary, 2012 Sculpin displaying in a Wild Fish Conservancy “photarium”, April 2012 Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................... 1 Section 1: Introduction ................................................................................................ 7 1.1 Purpose and Objectives ................................................................................................7 1.2 Study Area ...................................................................................................................8 Specific Hypotheses: ......................................................................................................... 10 Section 2: Methods ................................................................................................... 12 2.1 Habitat Inventory/ Sample Site Selection.................................................................... 12 2.2 Field Sampling Methodology ....................................................................................... 15 Data Recording/Water Quality Measures ............................................................................................ 17 2.3 Age Class Assignments ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Analysis of Ecological Characteristics
    Pacific County Shoreline Analysis Report 5 ANALYSIS OF ECOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS 5.1 Methods A GIS-based semi-quantitative method was developed to characterize the relative performance of relevant ecological processes and functions by shoreline reach, within the County, as outlined in WAC 173-26-201(3)(d)(i). The assessment used the available information gathered as part of the shoreline inventory and applied ranking criteria to provide a consistent methodological treatment among reaches. These semi-quantitative results will help provide a consistent treatment of all reaches in approximating existing ecological conditions, yet allow for a qualitative evaluation of functions for data that are not easily summarized by GIS data alone. The results are intended to complement the mapped inventory information (Appendix B) and numerical data (Table 4-3) and provide a comparison of watershed functions relative to other reaches in the County. The analysis of the ecological characteristics of the Coastal Ocean AU is different than the analysis for the other AUs. The main distinguishers for the Coastal Ocean AU are that 1) the Coastal Ocean AU does not contain distinct shoreline segments, and 2) there is a paucity of data on the dynamic, biophysical characteristics in the AU, so they are supplemented with human use data as proxies for nodes of ecological function. Reach Delineation In order to assess shoreline functions at a local scale, the ten AUs with upland areas within the County were broken into discrete reaches based on a review of maps and aerial photography. The Coastal Ocean AU is considered as a singular section (i.e., no distinct reaches) for this assessment.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 13 -- Puget Sound, Washington
    514 Puget Sound, Washington Volume 7 WK50/2011 123° 122°30' 18428 SKAGIT BAY STRAIT OF JUAN DE FUCA S A R A T O 18423 G A D A M DUNGENESS BAY I P 18464 R A A L S T S Y A G Port Townsend I E N L E T 18443 SEQUIM BAY 18473 DISCOVERY BAY 48° 48° 18471 D Everett N U O S 18444 N O I S S E S S O P 18458 18446 Y 18477 A 18447 B B L O A B K A Seattle W E D W A S H I N ELLIOTT BAY G 18445 T O L Bremerton Port Orchard N A N 18450 A 18452 C 47° 47° 30' 18449 30' D O O E A H S 18476 T P 18474 A S S A G E T E L N 18453 I E S C COMMENCEMENT BAY A A C R R I N L E Shelton T Tacoma 18457 Puyallup BUDD INLET Olympia 47° 18456 47° General Index of Chart Coverage in Chapter 13 (see catalog for complete coverage) 123° 122°30' WK50/2011 Chapter 13 Puget Sound, Washington 515 Puget Sound, Washington (1) This chapter describes Puget Sound and its nu- (6) Other services offered by the Marine Exchange in- merous inlets, bays, and passages, and the waters of clude a daily newsletter about future marine traffic in Hood Canal, Lake Union, and Lake Washington. Also the Puget Sound area, communication services, and a discussed are the ports of Seattle, Tacoma, Everett, and variety of coordinative and statistical information.
    [Show full text]
  • CR-102 (June 2012) PROPOSED RULE MAKING (Implements RCW 34.05.320) Do NOT Use for Expedited Rule Making Agency: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife
    CR-102 (June 2012) PROPOSED RULE MAKING (Implements RCW 34.05.320) Do NOT use for expedited rule making Agency: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Preproposal Statement of Inquiry was filed as WSR 14-24-118 filed 12/3/14;or Original Notice Expedited Rule Making--Proposed notice was filed as WSR ; or Supplemental Notice to WSR Proposal is exempt under RCW 34.05.310(4) or 34.05.330(1). Continuance of WSR Title of rule and other identifying information: See attachment A. Hearing location(s): Submit written comments to: Civic Center Name: Wildlife Program Commission Meeting Public Comments 411 South Balsam Street Address:600 Capitol Way North Moses Lake, WA 98837 Olympia, WA 98501 e-mail [email protected] fax (360) 902-2162 by (date) 2/24/15 Date: March 20-21, 2015 Time: 8:00 AM Assistance for persons with disabilities: Contact Tami Lininger by March 1, 2015 Date of intended adoption: On or after April 9, 2015 (Note: This is NOT the effective date) TTY (800) 833-6388 or (360) 902-2267 Purpose of the proposal and its anticipated effects, including any changes in existing rules: See attachment A Reasons supporting proposal: See attachment A Statutory authority for adoption: RCW 77.04.012, 77.04.055, Statute being implemented: RCW 77.04.012, 77.04.055, 77.12.047, 77.12.150 and 77.12.240. 77.12.047, 77.12.150 and 77.12.240. Is rule necessary because of a: CODE REVISER USE ONLY Federal Law? Yes No Federal Court Decision? State Court Decision? Yes No If yes, CITATION: Yes No DATE February 2, 2015 NAME (type or print) Joanna Eide SIGNATURE TITLE Rules Coordinator (COMPLETE REVERSE SIDE) Agency comments or recommendations, if any, as to statutory language, implementation, enforcement, and fiscal matters: When filing the permanent rule-making order (CR-103P), the WAC sections containing rule amendments will be consolidated into two or three Order Typing Service (OTS) documents.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific County, Washington and Incorporated Areas
    PACIFIC COUNTY, WASHINGTON AND INCORPORATED AREAS COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER ILWACO, TOWN OF 530127 LONG BEACH, TOWN OF 530128 PACIFIC COUNTY, 530126 UNINCORPORATED AREAS RAYMOND, CITY OF 530129 SHOALWATER BAY INDIAN TRIBE 530341 SOUTH BEND, CITY OF 530130 Pacific County PRELIMINARY: AUGUST 30, 2013 FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 53049CV000A NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report may not contain all data available within the Community Map Repository. Please contact the Community Map Repository for any additional data. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) may revise and republish part or all of this FIS report at any time. In addition, FEMA may revise part of this FIS report by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS report. Therefore, users should consult with community officials and check the Community Map Repository to obtain the most current FIS report components. Selected Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) panels for this community contain information that was previously shown separately on the corresponding Flood Boundary and Floodway Map (FBFM) panels (e.g., floodways, cross sections). In addition, former flood hazard zone designations have been changed as follows: Old Zone(s) New Zone Al through A30 AE B X C X Initial Countywide FIS Effective Date: To Be Determined TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Purpose of Study ................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Authority and Acknowledgments ...................................................................... 1 1.3 Coordination .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Washington State's Scenic Byways & Road Trips
    waShington State’S Scenic BywayS & Road tRipS inSide: Road Maps & Scenic drives planning tips points of interest 2 taBLe of contentS waShington State’S Scenic BywayS & Road tRipS introduction 3 Washington State’s Scenic Byways & Road Trips guide has been made possible State Map overview of Scenic Byways 4 through funding from the Federal Highway Administration’s National Scenic Byways Program, Washington State Department of Transportation and aLL aMeRican RoadS Washington State Tourism. waShington State depaRtMent of coMMeRce Chinook Pass Scenic Byway 9 director, Rogers Weed International Selkirk Loop 15 waShington State touRiSM executive director, Marsha Massey nationaL Scenic BywayS Marketing Manager, Betsy Gabel product development Manager, Michelle Campbell Coulee Corridor 21 waShington State depaRtMent of tRanSpoRtation Mountains to Sound Greenway 25 Secretary of transportation, Paula Hammond director, highways and Local programs, Kathleen Davis Stevens Pass Greenway 29 Scenic Byways coordinator, Ed Spilker Strait of Juan de Fuca - Highway 112 33 Byway leaders and an interagency advisory group with representatives from the White Pass Scenic Byway 37 Washington State Department of Transportation, Washington State Department of Agriculture, Washington State Department of Fish & Wildlife, Washington State Tourism, Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission and State Scenic BywayS Audubon Washington were also instrumental in the creation of this guide. Cape Flattery Tribal Scenic Byway 40 puBLiShing SeRviceS pRovided By deStination
    [Show full text]
  • Landslide and Liquefaction Maps for the Long Beach Peninsula
    LANDSLIDE AND LIQUEFACTION MAPS FOR THE LONG BEACH PENINSULA, PACIFIC COUNTY, WASHINGTON: Effects on Tsunami Inundation Zones of a Cascadia Subduction Zone Earthquake by Stephen L. Slaughter, Timothy J. Walsh, Anton Ypma, Kelsay M. D. Stanton, Recep Cakir, and Trevor A. Contreras WASHINGTON DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES Report of Investigations 37 October 2013 DISCLAIMER Neither the State of Washington, nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the State of Washington or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the State of Washington or any agency thereof. WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Peter Goldmark—Commissioner of Public Lands DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES David K. Norman—State Geologist John P. Bromley—Assistant State Geologist Washington Department of Natural Resources Division of Geology and Earth Resources Mailing Address: Street Address: MS 47007 Natural Resources Bldg, Rm 148 Olympia, WA 98504-7007 1111 Washington St SE Olympia, WA 98501 Phone: 360-902-1450; Fax: 360-902-1785 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.dnr.wa.gov/geology Publications List: http://www.dnr.wa.gov/researchscience/topics/geologypublications library/pages/pubs.aspx Online searchable catalog of the Washington Geology Library: http://www.dnr.wa.gov/researchscience/topics/geologypublications library/pages/washbib.aspx Washington State Geologic Information Portal: http://www.dnr.wa.gov/geologyportal Suggested Citation: Slaughter, S.
    [Show full text]
  • State Waterway Navigability Determination
    BODY OF WATER & LOCATION NAV CG NON-NAV CG REMARKS yellow highlight = apply to USCG for permit up to RM stipulated Alsea Bay, OR X Estuary of Pacific Ocean. Alsea River, OR X Flows into Alsea Bay, Waldport, OR. Navigable to mile 13. Ash Creek, OR X Tributary of Willamette River at Independence, OR. Barrett Slough, OR X Tributary of Lewis and Clark River. Bayou St. John, OR X Court decision, 1935 AMC 594, 10 Mile Lake, Coos County, OR. Bear Creek (Coos County), OR X Tributary of Coquille River (tidal at mile 0.5) Beaver Creek, OR X Tributary of Nestucca River. Beaver Slough, OR X See Clatskanie River. Big Creek (Lane County), OR X At U.S. 101 bridge (tidal). Big Creek (Lincoln County), OR X Flows into Pacific Ocean. Big Creek Slough, OR X Upstream end at Knappa, OR (tidal). At site of Birch Creek (Sparks) Bridge on Canyon Road near Birch Creek, OR X Pendleton, OR. Side channel of Yaquina River. 3 mi. downstream from Toledo, Blind Slough, OR X OR (tidal). Tributary of Knappa Slough. 10 mi. upstream from Astoria, OR Blind Slough/ Gnat Creek, OR X (tidal at mile 2.0). Boone Slough, OR X Tributary of Yaquina River between Newport and Toledo, OR. Side channel of Willamette River. 3 miles upstream from Booneville Channel, OR X Corvallis, OR. Boulder Creek, OR X 7 miles N of Lake Quinalt. Side channel of Columbia River. 5 miles N of Clatskanie, OR Bradbury Slough, OR X (tidal). Brownlee Reservoir, ID /OR X See Snake River. Also known as South Channel.
    [Show full text]