DOCSLIB.ORG

Archives and Museum Informatics Newsletter, Vol.1, No. 2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Archives and Museum Informatics Newsletter, Vol.1, No. 2 ARCHIVAL INFORMATICS NEWSLETTER Part 1 of Archival Informatics Newsletter &. Technical Reports ISSM 0892-2179 Sua.or.1987 Yoluao 1.· 2 welcome. Firstbecause theyare chall~ THIS ISSUE inthemselves. and are the kinds of opimon Actually. Canada has been justnorth ofus for a pieces which would nothave found their longJime. even though itmay seem from this issue of way to J!rin.t ex~ through a vehicle such as theNewsletterthatwe justdiscovered it! this. an(l second oecausethey demonstrate a As~ throu~outthisissue. archival automa­ need for the Archival InformaticsNewsletter tionactivityinCanidahasreachedacrescendorecent­ more than anvt.bin.e I can;:r' ly. Tom Brown's column (p.5-7) reports on the ex­ The first isSue ofArchL Informatics citing I-ASSIST and ACAmeetings. The article by Technical R~. on Optica1Media in John"McDonald (p.14-15) exploresthe challeJ:Jges archives and museums. was published in being faced bythe new National Archives ofCanada May. Issue 2. on Colle~ Software in and declares the rights of archivists to be enfranchis­ archives and museumswill e availablein ed inthe requirements definition t>tocessesforinfor­ August. The fall issue will be devoted to the mation~ms serving all aetiviueswitbintheiror­ requirementsforcollectionsm~ement. It ganizations. On pages 15-16. I introduce the Plan­ will discuss not only the information needs ning Committee on DescriptiveStandardsand their ofcollectionsmanagers and define software plans (whatmy Smithsonian colle~es were fond of ~ms to meetthem. butalso examinethe Chiding me byca11iJJg "plan-plans"). relationship between co11ectionsmanage­ But Canada doesn't have a monopoly- on debates mentand otberinstitutionalmissions. about descriptive standards. On pages 9-13. Usa Weber. the automation officerofthe SM. presents a TABLB OF CONTENTS discussion ofthe confusion and confiietSUlTOunding description of microforms (and. by extension. any Museum Automation at AAM 2 "copies" inanothermedium) within theframework of ARTFL and Textual Archives 4 the MARC Formats for Bibli~hic Descri¢on. If the detai1stend attimes tobehairsplitting. itfefleets Tom Brown on: the ~lem oftaying to define a ~icdescriptive I-ASSIST Conference 5 cataloging rule to meetthe needs Of a V8riety ofuser ACA Conference 7 communities. No single. "logically consistent" view seems to do for all. Letters to the Editor 8 This. of course. isthe challenge faced by museum Standards 8 informationprofessionals whose situationis the sub­ jectofmyreflections on the AAM me~ which was Lisa Weber on: JUst held inSan Francisco (p.24). Amidst some Describing Microforms: 9 promising developmentsininformationstandards and some tentativeofferings of computer software. the John McDonald on: chaos of Babble. each with his or her own language. Electronic Records &. the new reigned. And yet. there was a sense of promise inthe National Archives of Canada 14 air. of a new beginning I am delighted to be running letters to the editor. Canadian Descriptive Standards 15 The interest. controversy. and information exch~e Conferences 16 potential ofthe first issueis immenselygratifying.-1 In-Box 17 hope thatthe requests for dialog issued by each ofthe Software Briefs 20 aufhors of pieces in this issue Will find an equally responsive audience. Capturing Rich Contexts 22 The contributions I received to this issue are doubly Report on Col1ecting Software 24 Museum Automation at the AAM only important if we want to communicate with by David Bearman anyone, and then reported on how the project she directs. AVIADOR, has make use of both AACR2 I think we will come to see the year that the (library community cataloging standards) and American Association of Museums met in San the AAT. Eleanor Fink, reported in the use of Francisco as a watershed in museum automation. MARC by the Index of American Sculpture and Although there was a certain immaturity expos­ the development of shared data definitions be­ ed in the balance of sessions (only one session tween that project, the Index of American Paint­ devoted specifically to mainline automation con­ ing and several other art database projects at the cerns out of four overall, with the others dedicat­ Smithsonian National Museum of American Art. ed to CD. digital color imaging, and artificial The MARC format was serving well as a means for intelligence), automation emerged as a full­ inter-system data sharing. fledged partner in the professionalization of Lenore Sarasan of Willoughby Associates was registrars and collections managers. The same to present the "devils advocate" position. But as immaturity was evident on the exhibit floor. she argued that standards could be developed by where systems accessing videodisc or digitized users of commercial systems. and presented the images attracted more attention than a five digit work her firm was doing in developing common numeric field in a database deserves. Yet some of data dictionaries and authority files for clients. the systems being displayed were practical and it was evident that this sphere of standardiza­ could be implemented essentially as is. And al­ tion did for those users exactly what profession­ though it was clear that most AAM members are wide standards might do for all museums. Lenore still lost in the present of automation. it was evi­ revealed that any argument about the need for dent that an adequate number can not only see standards in the museum community is no longer the outlines of a future but are taking actions to about ends, but about tactics. assure that it evolves according to a profession­ Two promising tactical developments were ally dictated plan. featured in sessions. The first. already briefly mentioned, is the revision of Nomenclature by a Sessions: committee (albeit self-appointed) representing a While many attendees wlliiong remember the range of museums which have used the classifica­ extraordinarlly crisp color images presented by tion system. More important than the second HowlU'd Besser and the experimental digitizing edition itself (although it will improve on the systems at the University of California. or the de­ first). is the self-conscious discussion which the lightful tour of artificial intelligence pastures group generated about the purposes of an in Stuart Dreyfus' keynote address. the museum hierarchical classification system and the differ­ profession will be influenced over the longer run ence between those ends and the aims of an index­ by the dialog begun in three sessions devoted to ing vocabulary. While the discussion at the ses­ discussions of evolving information exchange sion itself did not resolve the purpose of the new standards. edition. it paved the way for increasingly sophis­ The one session explicitly devoted to museum ticated discussions of the aims of different types information standards, chaired by Deirdre Stam. of standards. focused the issues. Toni Petersen (editor of the The third session was a report to the commun­ Art and Architecture Thesaurus) spoke to the ity by participants in the spring Conference on a very concept of a standard as something support­ Common Agenda for History Museums. sponsored ed by numerous agencies and not subject to uni­ by the Smithsonian Institution. The meeting was lateral change. Recognizing that standards are held to identify actions required in four areas: expensive to maintain, she insisted that they are collections, collaboration. interpretation and essential in our complex society. She then pre­ documentation. The working groups will be con­ sented the AAT as a potential vocabulary stand­ tinued under a broader umbrella of the AASLH ard. Jim Blakaby reported on the efforts of a in the next year, but their two day output is it­ committee involved in revision of Cbenball's self exceptionally promising. especially in the Nomenclature. a topic to which he had previously difficult area of common databases and document­ addressed himself in a session devoted strictly ation where the group launched a survey of the to the revision process. He presented Chenhall data fields currently used by history museums as a classification system, which could be a as a first step towards normalizing the data in a standard while being open to local addition of data dictionary which could help museums to specific terms at the lower levels. Angela Gira" plan for common documentation. The modesty of of the Avery Art Index. noted that standards are the effort bodes well for its ultimate success. as 2 Archival Informatics Newsletter voL 1, #2 does the openness of the subcommittee to a per­ collection or a modest history or archeology mus­ missive data standard. The conference report eum. Only the US Park Service DBase III System, will be published in fuB by the AASLH this fall. which is too limited and unsupported to be taken seriously as an option for others, and the Oracle­ Systems: based MYMSY (Willoughby) are built on commer­ Six museum information retrieval/cataloging cial DBMS's. The others have a few startling systems were exhibited at San Francisco along weaknesses as a consequence. with numerous membership/development. finan­ At present the vendors of museum software cial, ticketing. shipping and other applications. products are not doing a very good job of differen­ With the exception of a new offering from QL tiation themselves, in part. it appears, because Systems (The Volunteer Management System), I they do not tnow the capabilities of their compe­ will restrict this report to comparing these six. tition. Each claims to be better able to support a First. because it is too good to pass up. I want museum because of their experience in museums. to share my enthusiasm about the QL product but none can point to more than a handful of in­ ($399; $299 from AAM to AAM Members). The stallations of their present system. There is a Volunteer Management System is, simply, the definite tendency to mislead naive users about best human resource management package devot­ the virtues of operating systems (Plct vs. Concur­ ed to this tedious but critical function I've ever rent DOS, vs. MS-DOS vs.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Evaluation of the Archival Information Systems Thinking Framework Abstract Introduction
    Evaluation of the Archival Information Systems Thinking Framework Hugo Quisbert Luleå University of Technology Dept. of Computer & Systems Sciences University Area +46 920 49 18 10 [email protected] Abstract Archives are an essential part of our societal memory. The use of Information Technology (IT) in archival context has pointed out the need of preserving digital information. There is a need of methods and techniques for preservation activities and the development of supporting tools. Archival Information Systems are a special kind of information systems. The development of Archival Information Systems has to be non-ad hoc implementation based on a special way of thinking. The paper A Foundation for Archival Information Systems Development (Quisbert, Hägerfors, 2006) proposes a thinking framework based on the Records Continuum Model, the OAIS Reference Model and the Model Driven Architecture (MDA). In this paper the results of an evaluation of this thinking framework are presented. The evaluation shows that the framework might be useful but further evaluation is needed. The evaluation also shows the lack of fundamental principles for long-term preservation and access. The Centre for Long-term Digital Preservation (CLDP) connected to the Luleå University of Technology (LTU) in Sweden, is an R&D division working with digital preservation issues. The intention of the proposed framework is to be the fundament for developing a prototype for an Archival Information System, at this centre. Later, a complete software implementation base upon the proposed framework should be developed in order to support long-term preservation of digital information embracing important characteristics of the Continuum Model and the OAIS Reference Model and the MDA.
    [Show full text]
  • Archival Theory and Machine Readable Records
    ARCHIVAL THEORY AND MACHINE READABLE RECORDS: SOME PROBLEMS AND ISSUES By Catherine Aileen Bailey B.A, The University of British Columbia, 1986 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARCHIVAL STUDIES in THE SCHOOL OF LIBRARY, ARCHIVAL AND INFORMATION STUDIES We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA AUGUST 1988 © Catherine A. Bailey, 1988 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of- ToPnmnahon SturJI\ The University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada DE-6 (2/88) ii ABSTRACT It is a common feeling among archivists that the basic principles of archival theory may have to be examined and redefined in light of the development of computer technology. This need exists not so much because archivists are currently faced with a new and unfamiliar medium, but because the new technology changes not only the uses made of the information but also the way in which we perceive it. The many attempts to approach the problem in the last twenty years have tended to be focused on single archival functions rather than on fundamental archival principles, and the solutions proposed were essentially practical.
    [Show full text]
  • Medline-Sourced Journals Are Indicated in Green) Print-ISSN E-ISSN
    Sourcerecord id Source Title (Medline-sourced journals are indicated in Green) Print-ISSN E-ISSN 18500162600 21st Century Music 15343219 21100404576 2D Materials 20531583 21100447128 3 Biotech 2190572X 21905738 21100779062 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing 23297662 23297670 21100229836 3D Research 20926731 19700200922 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature 01285157 145295 4OR 16194500 16142411 16400154734 A + U-Architecture and Urbanism 03899160 5700161051 A Contrario 16607880 21100399164 A&A case reports 23257237 21100881366 A&A practice 25753126 19600162043 A.M.A. American Journal of Diseases of Children 00968994 19400157806 A.M.A. archives of dermatology 00965359 19600162081 A.M.A. Archives of Dermatology and Syphilology 00965979 19400157807 A.M.A. archives of industrial health 05673933 19600162082 A.M.A. Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Occupational Medicine 00966703 19400157808 A.M.A. archives of internal medicine 08882479 19400158171 A.M.A. archives of neurology 03758540 19400157809 A.M.A. archives of neurology and psychiatry 00966886 19400157810 A.M.A. archives of ophthalmology 00966339 19400157811 A.M.A. archives of otolaryngology 00966894 19400157812 A.M.A. archives of pathology 00966711 19400157813 A.M.A. archives of surgery 00966908 21100456161 a/b: Auto/Biography Studies 21517290 11600153683 A|Z ITU Journal of Faculty of Architecture 13028324 21100780699 A+BE Architecture and the Built Environment 22123202 22147233 5800207606 AAA, Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 01715410 28033 AAC: Augmentative and Alternative
    [Show full text]
  • Electronic Evidence, © Archives & Museum Informatics, 1994 CHAPTER THREE Electronic Records Guidelines: a Manual for Policy Development and ~M~Lementation*
    SECTION 11 Policy Guidelines CHAPTER THREE Electronic Records Guidelines: A Manual for Policy Development and Implementation CHAPTER FOUR The Implications of Armstrong v. the Executive Office of the President for the Archival Management of Electronic Records D. Bearman, Electronic Evidence, © Archives & Museum Informatics, 1994 CHAPTER THREE Electronic Records Guidelines: A Manual for Policy Development and ~m~lementation* Policies for management of electronic records must be tailored to management requirements of each organization and must define electronic records in a way that can be im- plemented by people and machines. Record retention deci- sions are risk management decisions. Immediate responsibility for appropriate retention and ongoing accessibility of elec- tronic records must be clearly assigned to line management. lnformation managers -- including archivists, records man- agers, telecommunications and data processing staffs -- all need to contribute through systems design and implementa- tion, technology assessment, and ongoing technology moni- toring. A sound program will be based on a systems life-cycle approach that logically integrates records without respect to media, lnformation Resource Directory Systems can help bridge disciplines and organization units. Line units should re- tain physical control over electronic records and should be re- quired to ensure retention, preservation of functionality, secu- rity, and confidentiality. These policy objectives can be achieved by focusing on application systems as the loci of records policy implementation and practicing documentation as a means of control. Increased awareness of technical ob- stacles to adequate management of electronic records must be achieved throughout the organization. * Originally published in slightly longer form as Sections A, B, and C of Chapter I1 in Advisory Committee for the Co-ordination of Information Systems, Managernall of Electronic Records: Issues and Guidelines (New York United Nations, 1990): 17-34.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Archival Value: an Axiological Approach Elaine Samantha Marston Penn UCL Thesis Submitted in Fulfilment of the Degree
    Exploring Archival Value: An Axiological Approach Elaine Samantha Marston Penn UCL Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the degree of PhD in Information Studies – Archival Studies I, Elaine Samantha Marston Penn, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. 2 Abstract The proposition of this thesis is to explore a key concept in archival theory and practice, namely the value of archives. The underlying principle is that by drawing upon ideas from outside of the archival discipline – from axiology – this concept can be examined in an innovative and reflective manner. The evaluation of archives is a core activity for archivists. Archivists make value judgements when they decide what to keep and what to destroy, and in how they choose to arrange and describe archives. However, although the term ‘value’ appears frequently in the professional archival literature, often linked with other qualifying terms, including ‘historical’, ‘evidential’, ‘legal’ and ‘informational’, these terms are contested, often ill-defined, and frequently misleading. This thesis critically examines the theoretical concepts behind such terms and their use within the archival profession. The application of Theory Derivation methodology, which employs analogy or metaphor to transpose and redefine a concept or theory from one context to another, enables the author to find new insight and explanations for archival value from the field of axiology (the study of value and value judgements). This thesis explores questions about what sort of property or characteristic of an object gives it value, whether having value is an objective or a subjective matter, and whether value can be measured.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Article
    286 American Archivist / Vol. 52 / Summer 1989 Research Article Downloaded from http://meridian.allenpress.com/american-archivist/article-pdf/52/3/286/2747828/aarc_52_3_g562600um1063123.pdf by guest on 29 September 2021 Authority Control Issues and Prospects DAVID BEARMAN Abstract: Research on authority control reported in archival, library, and information science literature suggests that efforts to control topical subject terminology are inappro- priate and ineffective in an archival setting because researchers are unlikely to use the same terminology as that contained in the documents, and because most users value precision over recall (inclusiveness) in their searching. The author argues that archival retrieval will be enhanced by placing more emphasis on increasing the number of access points and less on achieving consistency in indexing. He describes various kinds of au- thority files and identifies several (occupation, time period, geographic coordinates, form- of-material, and function) that offer the most promise. He advocates the use of existing reference files and cooperative development of new ones, to be used not only in the traditional authority-control sense but also as valuable information resources in their own right. About the author: David Bearman is the editor of Archives and Museum Informatics and Archives and Museum Informatics Technical Reports and is the founder of Archives & Museum Informatics, a consulting firm in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. He has written extensively on issues related to archival automation and
    [Show full text]
  • Do Real Archivists Need Archives & Museum Informatics?
    666 American Archivist / Vol. 53 / Fall 1990 Review Essay ANNE R. KENNEY, editor Downloaded from http://meridian.allenpress.com/american-archivist/article-pdf/53/4/666/2748076/aarc_53_4_y32h731602772u36.pdf by guest on 29 September 2021 Do Real Archivists Need Archives & Museum Informatics? ANN PEDERSON Abstract: Archives & Museum Informatics disseminates news and analysis of develop- ments in automation and information technologies and their effects within the archival and museum communities through the publication of a quarterly newsletter and a technical reports series, both of which are edited by David Bearman. The author reviews the contents of both the newsletters and the technical reports, concluding that they comprise a unique and badly needed means to help archivists understand the new approaches, techniques, and technologies that are reshaping human communication. About the author: Ann Pederson is a senior lecturer in archives administration and records man- agement in the School of Librarianship, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. She is a member of the governing council of the Australian Society of Archivists, Inc., and is the editor and coauthor of the critically acclaimed text, Keeping Archives. Archives & Museum Informatics 667 THE QUESTION IN THE title certainly pro- automation news that was essential for the vides the central focus of this essay and successful management of modern docu- suggests corollaries: do archivists read Ar- mentation, but which was virtually inac- chives & Museum Informatics (AMI)
    [Show full text]
  • Archival Informatics Newsletter
    ARCHIVAL INFORMATICS NEWSLETTER ISSN 0892-2179 FALL 1988 Volume 2 #3 Defining Data and Functions for r'1anagernent, Project r'1anagement, Desk Top Archives & Museum Systems Publishing and Busmess Graph1cs Effort.s to adopt amore uniform perspective software nlis market. In turn, S8t. , F2r the r'1useum Computer Network meeting on m will, 1~ ,,~nta minimal standards and reward vendors WhO f10mca mOCtober, I put together a 11st. prOVide fully capable sYstems Over t.M 01 100 vendOrs of archlV8s, museum and corning year, I will be lnyolved in contract t.o records management software! With ~ many a sYstems to choose between, users tire going to prOVide adesign t.o the Research Libraries Group for alocal archives/museum system need considerable help. The accompanying list that will serve as aworkst.ation RLI N of 75 consu ltants may be of some use here but to During the contract period. numerous I t.hink it is fort.unate on the whole that another institut.ions w1ll participat.e in requirement.s strat.egy 1S beg1nning 1.0 emerge, Let's call1t OOf1nit.ion exercises, and ageneral mode', of "codification" or "rat.ionalization" of t.he dat.a. functions, fmd structures of tlrchwes tlnd requ1rements and data will be construct.ed whic~l I would ~Iope to present. for professlOn museum mformation syst.ems, wide review, I am confident that such Hie purpose of anumber' of ongoing efforts is dissemination of models of archives and to develop frameworks within which local raqUlrements and the offerings of different museum syst.ems w1ll, in t1me.
    [Show full text]
  • A Citation Analysis of North American Archival Periodical Literature Anne J
    ARCHIVY AND THE COMPUTER: A CITATION ANALYSIS OF NORTH AMERICAN ARCHIVAL PERIODICAL LITERATURE ANNE J. GILLILAND-SWETLAND ABSTRACT: The author reviews bibliographic analyses that have been conduct- ed on American archival literature. She then reports the methodology and results of a citation analysis that she conducted on articles in six periodicals core to the professional reading of North American archivists. The analysis, which covers the lifespan of the periodicals, identifies key individuals and pub- lications, as well as disciplinary influences and seminal writings in the area of archival automation and electronic records. The author speculates about the implications of these findings and also recommends citation analysis as a useful research approach for understanding the development of archival practice and education. Introduction This project used citation analysis to explore the core periodical literature published and read by archivists in North America in an attempt to identify key figures and disciplines that have influenced the archival profession as it increas- ingly interacts with the computer. The results of this investigation are potential- ly of use to the archival profession as it struggles to define itself through debates regarding long-range planning and archival education by making archivists more conscious of their own reading matter. A major value of the project thus lies in its ability to paint a detailed picture of how the profession has been developing and how archivists are learning about the important new facets of their work opened up by the computer. This clearer perspective on recent trends may, in turn, inform the profession as it decides what form archival education should take and how the profession should develop its goals and priorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Documenting Documentation
    Documenting Documentation by DAVID BEARMAN* Introduction An Ad Hoc Commission of the International Council on Archives has recently proposed principles and rules for archival description.' Unfortunately the particular principles and rules being proposed fall short of what is needed.2 This paper elaborates alternative prin- ciples for documenting documentation which have been emerging from the collective activity of many U.S. archivists over the past decade, but which have not been presented together before. The "Statement of Principles Regarding Archival Description" (referred to as "ICA Principles" throughout this text) and "Draft General International Standard Archival Description" rules (referred to throughout as "lSAD(G)"), which have been circulated for comment by the ICA Ad Hoc Commission on Descriptive Standards, each consist of statements of differing degrees of generality which might be considered either as prin- ciples of or as rules for archival description. The ICA Principles reflect existing methods of archival description (at least in North America), while those suggested here for documenting documentation have not yet been developed, widely accepted or even com- pletely elaborated. They are advanced here in part because the ICA Principles rationalize existing prac- tice - which the author believes as a practical matter we cannot afford; which fail to provide direct access for most archives users; and which do not support the day-to-day information requirements of archivists themselves.' These alternatives are also advanced because of three, more theoretical, differences with the ICA Principles: (1) In focusing on description rather than documentation, they overlook the most salient characteristic of archival records: their status as evidence.
    [Show full text]
  • UCLA Department of Information Studies: Doctoral Student Forum
    UCLA Department of Information Studies: Doctoral Student Forum Search About IS Programs Research Diversity Resources Students Faculty/Staff Alumni UCLA Department of Information Studies Doctoral Student Forum January 12, 2006 1:00 - 4:00 pm with refreshments Room 111, GSE&IS Building. Featuring panel presentations of work done during the 2005 Information Studies research mentorship program. Jesse H. Shera: A Historian of Librarianship - Stasa Milojevic "Building" the Information Society: A Library-Centered Critical Theory of Technology - Ajit Pyati A CRITical Discussion: An introduction of Critical Race Information Theory (CRIT) - Anthony W. Dunbar (Tony) Beyond the Paper Paradigm, Toward a Full Archival Descriptive Standard: Extending and Modifying Archival Description to Accommodate Electronic Records - Lori Lindberg Giving Voice to the Voiceless: Comic Strips as Evidence of Various Discourses in the African American Community (1930-1950) - Kelvin L. White Jesse H. Shera: A Historian of Librarianship Stasa Milojevic Jesse H. Shera (1903-1982) is often considered to be a single most influential theorist of library science. Although not widely known or recognized for his historical work, Shera’s Foundations of the PublicLibrary is a “citation classic” for anyone interested in history of public libraries in America. It was one of the first works to depart from the celebratory view of the libraries, and instead use methods of what has been known as a “new history”, or what we now call social history. Shera was a pioneer of a new library history, synthesizing and analyzing historical material and events, rather than just chronicling them. In his early period, Shera wrote about the history, American library history and the history of librarianship.
    [Show full text]
  • A Framework for the Development of Archival Information Systems
    2006:62 LICENTIATE T H E SI S A Framework for the Development of Archival Information Systems Hugo Quisbert Luleå University of Technology Department of Business Administration and Social Sciences Division of Systems Sciences 2006:62|: 02-757|: -c -- 06 ⁄62 -- A FRAMEWORK FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARCHIVAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS Hugo Quisbert Licentiate Thesis Luleå University of Technology Department of Business Administration and Social Sciences Division of Systems Sciences ii iii ABSTRACT In this thesis a framework for the development of Archival Information Systems are proposed. IT community and long-term digital preservation research has not addressed the development of digital archival tools. The IT community addresses Archives and digital archiving almost as a storage place aimed for backup services. Long-term digital preservation research has put efforts in metadata research, and in the use of different preservation techniques in order to preserve digitally stored information. Archival Information Systems are and their development is a natural part of the field of Long-term Digital Preservation. Archival Information Systems are aimed to receive maintain, support digital preservation issues and give access to digitally stored information. This digitally stored information consists in different kind of documents or records physically manifested in computer files, databases, etc. Archival Information Systems are a special kind of Information Systems. As every specialized kind of Information System, Archival Information Systems development must be preceded by a specialized way of thinking. This thesis proposes a specialized way of thinking, a framework, for the development of Archival Information Systems. The proposed framework is based on The Records Continuum Model and The OAIS Reference Model as major fundaments.
    [Show full text]