DOCSLIB.ORG

Exploring Archival Value: an Axiological Approach Elaine Samantha Marston Penn UCL Thesis Submitted in Fulfilment of the Degree

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Exploring Archival Value: an Axiological Approach Elaine Samantha Marston Penn UCL Thesis Submitted in Fulfilment of the Degree Exploring Archival Value: An Axiological Approach Elaine Samantha Marston Penn UCL Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the degree of PhD in Information Studies – Archival Studies I, Elaine Samantha Marston Penn, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. 2 Abstract The proposition of this thesis is to explore a key concept in archival theory and practice, namely the value of archives. The underlying principle is that by drawing upon ideas from outside of the archival discipline – from axiology – this concept can be examined in an innovative and reflective manner. The evaluation of archives is a core activity for archivists. Archivists make value judgements when they decide what to keep and what to destroy, and in how they choose to arrange and describe archives. However, although the term ‘value’ appears frequently in the professional archival literature, often linked with other qualifying terms, including ‘historical’, ‘evidential’, ‘legal’ and ‘informational’, these terms are contested, often ill-defined, and frequently misleading. This thesis critically examines the theoretical concepts behind such terms and their use within the archival profession. The application of Theory Derivation methodology, which employs analogy or metaphor to transpose and redefine a concept or theory from one context to another, enables the author to find new insight and explanations for archival value from the field of axiology (the study of value and value judgements). This thesis explores questions about what sort of property or characteristic of an object gives it value, whether having value is an objective or a subjective matter, and whether value can be measured. Philosophical concepts of value, in particular concepts of intrinsic value – as exemplified in the work of G. E. Moore (1873-1958) – are explored. The re-interpretation of key tenets of archival theory, including appraisal, provenance and respect des fonds, through the particular framework of Moore’s Principle of organic unities will demonstrate that the concept of value has a wider resonance in the archival field than has been previously considered. 3 Table of contents Page no. Declaration 2 Abstract 3 Table of contents 4 Acknowledgements 8 List of abbreviations 9 Editorial conventions 10 Chapter 1. Introduction 11-38 1.1 Chapter summary 12 1.2. Justification of topic 12 1.3. Research questions 20 1.4. Some definitions: life cycle and records continuum 21 1.5. Methodology 28 1.6. Thesis outline 35 Chapter 2. A chronology of the development of archival 39-86 appraisal theory 2.1. Chapter summary 39 2.2. The early twentieth century 39 2.2.1. Introduction 39 2.2.2. 1920s-1960s (UK) 40 2.2.3. 1930s-1960s (US) 45 2.2.4. Influence of Jenkinson and Schellenberg in US, UK 50 and Australia 2.2.5. Concluding remarks 54 2.3. The late twentieth century 54 2.3.1. Introduction 54 2.3.2. 1970s and 1980s (US) 55 2.3.3. 1980s (Canada) 60 2.3.4. 1990s 64 2.3.5. Concluding remarks 77 2.4. Twenty-first century approaches to appraisal 77 2.5. Concluding remarks 85 4 Chapter 3. Value and the archival principle of provenance 87-114 3.1. Chapter summary 87 3.2. Introduction 87 3.3. Historical origins of the principle of provenance 90 3.4. Interpretations of provenance 92 3.4.1. Provenance = respect des fonds 92 3.4.2. Provenance = record context(s) 96 3.5. The archival fonds 100 3.5.1. Fonds as organic whole 100 3.5.2. The record group concept 104 3.5.3. The ‘conceptual fonds’ 108 3.6. Concluding remarks 112 Chapter 4. The evolution of archival theory: influences, impacts 115-149 and underlying assumptions 4.1. Chapter summary 115 4.2. Introduction 115 4.3. The value of archives as cultural resources 119 4.4. Economic and social measurements of archival value 128 4.5. The value of archives as information assets and evidence of 137 good governance 4.6. Concluding remarks 147 Chapter 5. Value in axiology literature 150-175 5.1. Chapter summary 150 5.2. Introduction to axiology 150 5.2.1. The Austro-German school of value theory 151 5.2.2. The English school of value theory 153 5.2.3. The US school of value theory 156 5.3. Main concerns of axiology 157 5.3.1. Objectivism and subjectivism 158 5.3.2. Intrinsic and extrinsic and instrumental value 163 5.3.3. (In)commensurability of value 168 5.4. Concluding remarks 174 Chapter 6. Moore’s Principle of organic unities 176-201 6.1. Chapter summary 176 5 6.2. Introduction 176 6.3. Biography of G. E. Moore and Principia Ethica 178 6.4. Outline of the Principle 183 6.5. Critiques of the Principle 189 6.5.1. By Moore himself 190 6.5.2. By Moore’s contemporaries 191 6.5.3. By later philosophers 192 6.6. Concluding remarks 200 Chapter 7. Archival value: a re-interpretation 202-238 7.1. Chapter summary 202 7.2. Introduction 202 7.3. Transposition of the strong interpretation of the Principle of 204 organic unities to the archival context 7.3.1. Analogy with the archival theory of Hilary Jenkinson 205 7.3.2. Analogy with the archival theory of Luciana Duranti 209 7.3.3. Analogy with the archival theory of Theodore R. 212 Schellenberg 7.3.4. Analogy with the archival theory of Hans Booms 217 7.3.5. Analogy with the archival theories of David Bearman, 221 Terry Cook and Helen Samuels 7.4. Transposition of the weak interpretation of the Principle of 224 organic unities to the archival context 7.4.1. Analogy with the archival theories of Tom Nesmith 226 and Brien Brothman 7.4.2. Analogy with the archival theories of Lawrence 230 Dowler, Theodore R. Schellenberg and Terry Eastwood 7.5. Concluding remarks 235 Chapter 8. Conclusion 239-249 8.1. Chapter summary 239 8.2. Reflections on research methodology 239 8.3. Summary of thesis 241 8.4. Reflections on research questions 244 8.4.1. Is there something intrinsically valuable about 244 archives? Does such a thing as ‘archival value’ exist? 8.4.2. Can we define archival value? 245 6 8.4.3. Can we measure archival value? 246 8.5. Reflections on findings 246 8.5.1. The intrinsic value of archives ‘on the whole’ 247 8.5.2. The complexity of archival value concepts 247 8.5.3. The continuing relevance of ‘traditional’ archival 247 theory 8.5.4. The benefits of an interdisciplinary approach 248 8.5.5. The role and relevance of professional archival 248 practice 8.6. Areas for further research 249 Bibliography 250-310 7 Acknowledgements This thesis has been over six years in the making and would not have been possible without the support of family, friends and colleagues. I would like to thank my supervisors, Elizabeth Shepherd and Geoffrey Yeo, who have guided, advised, and challenged me, and helped me to produce my best. I am extremely grateful to the University of Westminster which has generously supported these endeavours, and in particular, I want to thank Jean Harrison, Suzanne Enright and Carole Satchwell who have been unstinting in their encouragement and support. Thanks also to Anna McNally, Claire Brunnen and Malcolm Bacon whose excellent capabilities allowed me to take sabbatical leave from my full-time role. I would also like to thank friends (and some-time fellow students) Zuleika Beaven, Charlotte Berry, Jenny Bunn, Eleanor Chrispin and Alexandra Eveleigh, who have listened to my ideas, helped me solve problems, and generally kept my spirits up. Last, but by no means least, a big thank you to my parents who have always believed in me, and to my brother Jason who, in addition to being a constant source of support and encouragement, has also patiently proof-read every page. Any errors that remain are entirely my own. 8 List of abbreviations AA The American Archivist (Journal of the Society of American Archivists, 1938-) ACA Association of Canadian Archivists Add. MSS Additional Manuscripts (Archival collection) AHRC Arts and Humanities Research Council, UK AM Archives and Manuscripts (Journal of the Archives Section of the Library Association of Australia, 1955-1975; Australian Society of Archivists, 1976-) ARA Archives and Records Association UK and Ireland (formerly, the Society of Archivists UK and Ireland) AS Archival Science, 2001- Ch. Chapter (of book) CIPFA Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy Cm. Command Paper (1986-) CUL Cambridge University Library DCMS Department for Culture, Media and Sport, UK ESRC Economic and Social Research Council, UK edn. Edition ed. Editor eds. Editors HEI Higher Education Institution HMSO Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, UK ICA International Council on Archives IRM Information Resource Management ISAD(G) General International Standard on Archival Description, ICA JSA Journal of the Society of Archivists UK and Ireland, 1955-2012 LAC Library and Archives Canada (formerly, the National Archives of Canada) 9 MLA Museum, Libraries and Archives Council, UK NARA National Archives and Records Administration, Washington DC, US nd No date (of publication) ODNB Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, H. G. C. Matthew and Brian Harrison, eds., (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004). Available online: http://www.oup.com/oxforddnb/info/online PRO Public Record Office (now The National Archives, UK) RAD Rules for Archival Description, Bureau of Canadian Archivists rev. Revised (edition) SAA Society of American Archivists Sect. Section (of book) SHL Senate House Library, London TNA The National Archives, UK transl. Translator UBC University of British Columbia, Canada UCL University College London UK United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland US United States of America vol.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Determination of Value in Archival Science and the Ever Evolving Theories of Records Selection
    The Eastern Librarian, Volume 23(1), 2012, ISSN: 1021-3643 (Print). Pages: 24-36. Available Online: http://www.banglajol.info/index.php/EL THE DETERMINATION OF VALUE IN ARCHIVAL SCIENCE AND THE EVER EVOLVING THEORIES OF RECORDS SELECTION Lekoko Kenosi, PhD University of Botswana, Botswana. E-mail: [email protected] Trevor Moatlhodi University of Botswana, Botswana. ABSTRACT The task of purging some records and retaining others for long term preservation in an archival repository has not been an easy one for records professionals. This task is even made more difficult by the fact that what is destroyed as useless by today’s standards can prove to be of invaluable use tomorrow. Ideally, archivists would want to keep everything to avoid such errors of judgment. However, the reality of limited storage facilities and the rate at which records are generated makes it impossible to preserve each and every record produced. This paper, co- authored by a graduate student and his mentor, discusses theories of records selection to help shape the difficult decisions of “to keep” and “what to eliminate” in an archival repository. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/el.v23i1.12116 KEYWORDS Archival Science, Records Selection, Taxonomy of Records Appraisal. INTRODUCTION The determination of value, or Appraisal, is one of the most controversial topics in archival discourse. The University of British Columbia (2003) defines appraisal as “the process of evaluating documents for the purpose of continuing preservation.” The history of the archival profession, from antiquity to the present moment, reflects appraisal as a key function of archivists. The main objectives of appraisal are to select records (with enduring value) for permanent 24 The Eastern Librarian-peer-reviewed journal in LIS since 1965 preservation and those that are identified as ephemeral for destruction.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Archival Information Systems Thinking Framework Abstract Introduction
    Evaluation of the Archival Information Systems Thinking Framework Hugo Quisbert Luleå University of Technology Dept. of Computer & Systems Sciences University Area +46 920 49 18 10 [email protected] Abstract Archives are an essential part of our societal memory. The use of Information Technology (IT) in archival context has pointed out the need of preserving digital information. There is a need of methods and techniques for preservation activities and the development of supporting tools. Archival Information Systems are a special kind of information systems. The development of Archival Information Systems has to be non-ad hoc implementation based on a special way of thinking. The paper A Foundation for Archival Information Systems Development (Quisbert, Hägerfors, 2006) proposes a thinking framework based on the Records Continuum Model, the OAIS Reference Model and the Model Driven Architecture (MDA). In this paper the results of an evaluation of this thinking framework are presented. The evaluation shows that the framework might be useful but further evaluation is needed. The evaluation also shows the lack of fundamental principles for long-term preservation and access. The Centre for Long-term Digital Preservation (CLDP) connected to the Luleå University of Technology (LTU) in Sweden, is an R&D division working with digital preservation issues. The intention of the proposed framework is to be the fundament for developing a prototype for an Archival Information System, at this centre. Later, a complete software implementation base upon the proposed framework should be developed in order to support long-term preservation of digital information embracing important characteristics of the Continuum Model and the OAIS Reference Model and the MDA.
    [Show full text]
  • If You Cannot Get Rid of the Family Skeleton, You May As Well
    “If you cannot get rid of the family skeleton, you may as well make it dance”:1 How one repository tangoed successfully with some controversial collection management activities. Mark Green I’ve been asked today to touch on four activities—collection analysis, deaccessioning, collecting policy, and active acquisition/appraisal—and to do so “provocatively,” within 20 or 25 minutes. I spend an hour during my Advanced Appraisal workshop for the Society of American Archivists talking about deaccessioning alone, so what I say here will be quite a simplification and condensation—perhaps that will help me be provocative. Some context. I have spent most of my 25-year career as an archivist working with what in the US we refer to as manuscripts collections and in the UK are apparently referred to as “private archives.” In doing so I have worked for a private state historical society in Minnesota with manuscript holdings of approximately 30,000 cubic feet [SLIDE 2], where my sole employment for 11 years was developing collecting policies, identifying and soliciting new acquisitions, appraising solicited and unsolicited collections, building and maintaining relations with donors, and toward the end of my tenure devising reappraisal and deaccessioning projects.2 For the past 8 years I have directed the American Heritage Center in Wyoming [SLIDE 3], part of a public—which is to say taxpayer-funded—university, with manuscript holdings of about 70,000 cubic feet.3 There I have the same responsibilities I had in Minnesota, except that they occupy only a portion of my time, and it is my responsibility to teach the archivists who work with me how and why to perform these tasks.
    [Show full text]
  • The Discursive Construction of Archival Science: Conceptual Foundations of a Discipline in Construction
    Thiago Henrique Bragato Barros and João Batista Ernesto de Moraes. 2011. The discursive construction of archival science: Conceptual foundations. In Smiraglia, Richard P., ed. Proceedings from North American Symposium on Knowledge Organization, Vol. 3. Toronto, Canada, pp. 196-206. Thiago Henrique Bragato Barros ([email protected]) and João Batista Ernesto de Moraes ([email protected]) Universidade Estadual Paulista, Marília SP Brazil The Discursive Construction of Archival Science: Conceptual Foundations of a Discipline in Construction Abstract: This work outlines a theoretical background established in Archival Science based mainly on discourse analysis as a key discipline to understand which the differences are and points of concep- tual commonality in the area. Uses the French Discourse Analysis as a principle with a theoretical and methodological framework to typify the archive as a discursive practice defined by their historical aspects of its institutional junctures. The study of discourse helps to understand how certain linguistic formations construct the discourse, concerned mainly with the context in which the text was pro- duced. This analysis take place from manuals and treatises of Archival Science produced during the development of discipline and regarded as grounds for discipline. We analyzed the Manual of an Arc- hival Arrangement and Description (vor Handleiding van het ordenen in bescheijven archieven) of Muller, Feith, and Fruin (Ed.1 1898). Another work considered is the Manual of Archive Administra- tion Including the Problems of War Archives and Archive a Making (1 Ed. 1922) and some of late works of Sir Hillary Jenkinson and finally analyzed the work of Theodore R. Schellenberg some as- pects of his vast bibliography.
    [Show full text]
  • Archival Theory and Machine Readable Records
    ARCHIVAL THEORY AND MACHINE READABLE RECORDS: SOME PROBLEMS AND ISSUES By Catherine Aileen Bailey B.A, The University of British Columbia, 1986 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARCHIVAL STUDIES in THE SCHOOL OF LIBRARY, ARCHIVAL AND INFORMATION STUDIES We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA AUGUST 1988 © Catherine A. Bailey, 1988 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of- ToPnmnahon SturJI\ The University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada DE-6 (2/88) ii ABSTRACT It is a common feeling among archivists that the basic principles of archival theory may have to be examined and redefined in light of the development of computer technology. This need exists not so much because archivists are currently faced with a new and unfamiliar medium, but because the new technology changes not only the uses made of the information but also the way in which we perceive it. The many attempts to approach the problem in the last twenty years have tended to be focused on single archival functions rather than on fundamental archival principles, and the solutions proposed were essentially practical.
    [Show full text]
  • The Concept of Appraisal and Archival Theory
    328 American Archivist / Vol. 57 / Spring 1994 Research Article Downloaded from http://meridian.allenpress.com/american-archivist/article-pdf/57/2/328/2748653/aarc_57_2_pu548273j5j1p816.pdf by guest on 29 September 2021 The Concept of Appraisal and Archival Theory LUCIANA DURANTI Abstract: In the last decade, appraisal has become one of the central topics of archival literature. However, the approach to appraisal issues has been primarily methodological and practical. This article discusses the theoretical implications of appraisal as attribution of value to archives, and it bases its argument on the nature of archival material as defined by traditional archival theory. About the author: Luciana Duranti is associate professor in the Master of Archival Studies Pro- gram, School of Library, Archival, and Information Studies, at the University of British Columbia. Before leaving Italy for Canada in 1987, she was professor-researcher in the Special School for Archivists and Librarians at the University of Rome. She obtained that position in 1982, after having held archival and teaching posts in the State Archives of Rome and its School, and in the National Research Council. She earned a doctorate in arts from the University of Rome (1973) and graduate degrees in archival science and diplomatics and paleography from the University of Rome (1975) and the School of the State Archives of Rome (1979) respectively. The Concept of Appraisal and Archival Theory 329 Appraisal is the process of establishing the preceded by an exploration of the concept value of documents made or received in the of appraisal in the context of archival the- course of the conduct of affairs, qualifying ory, but only by a continuous reiteration of that value, and determining its duration.
    [Show full text]
  • Appraisal As a Political Strategy: Centering Our Values on the Oppressed
    Appraisal as a Political Strategy: Centering Our Values on the Oppressed Michelle Caswell, PhD Associate Professor, Information Studies, UCLA Co-founder: South Asian American Digital Archive (SAADA) @professorcaz White Supremacy "…a political, economic, and cultural system in which whites overwhelmingly control power and material resources, conscious and unconscious ideas of white superiority and entitlement are widespread, and relations of white dominance and non-white subordination are daily reenacted across a broad array of institutions and social settings.” • Frances Lee Ansley, "Stirring the Ashes: Race Class and the Future of Civil Rights Scholarship." Cornell L. Rev. 74 (1988): 993. Butler Library, Columbia University Feminist Standpoint Appraisal • methodology, epistemology, & political strategy • inverts dominant hierarchies • Values records activated in service to the oppressed • Shifts from “view from nowhere” to a socially located agent centering ways of being and knowing from the margins WEBCHAM “The white, ethnically European, bourgeois, Christian, heterosexual, able-bodied, male (WEBCHAM) presence is labeled the mainstream and, hence, the universal from which all else is a deviation. The WEBCHAM mainstream is not viewed as a special interest, while the diverse others are. In a sense, universality/ diversity is the ideal of patriarchal reason.” Hope Olson, “Patriarchal Structures of Subject Access and Subversive Techniques for Change,” The Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science 26:2/3 (2001): 4. Feminist Standpoint Epistemology “It is impossible to separate the structure and thematic content of thought from the historical and material conditions shaped by the lives of its producers.” Patricia Hill Collins, “Learning from the Outsider Within: The Sociological Significance of Black Feminist Thought,” As reprinted in The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader.
    [Show full text]
  • Concepts Op Value in the Archival Appraisal Literature
    CONCEPTS OP VALUE IN THE ARCHIVAL APPRAISAL LITERATURE AN HISTORICAL AND CRITICAL ANALYSIS bv RICHARD KLUMPENHOUWER B.A., Calvin College/ 1981 M.A., University of Western Ontario, 1982 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARCHIVAL STUDIES in THE FACULTY OF ARTS School of Library, Archival, and Information Studies and the Department of History We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA October 1988 © Richard Klumpenhouwer, 1988 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. 1 further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of The University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada DE-6 (2/88) ABSTRACT Archival appraisal is the most challenging and at the same time the most improtant task performed by archivists. The complex meaning, varied form, and massive volume of modern documentary information, which now occupies the lion's share of archivists' attention, present immense challenges during the appraisal process. Yet it is precisely these factors which make archival appraisal such an important activity, for it is the responsibility of archivists to preserve and make available a documentary record that is both usable and complete.
    [Show full text]
  • A Retrospective Bibliography
    A Retrospective Bibliography Introduction This bibliography, which derives primarily from the archives course co-sponsored by the Archives Section of the Canadian Historical Association and the Public Archives of Canada, is being presented here in an attempt to cover a substantial portion of the published literature in the field of archives and auxiliary sciences. The editors are acutely aware that this bibliography includes material which is hopelessly obsolete, repetitious or of secondary importance; however, the task of selecting titles without the active participation of the Canadian archival community would have delayed the publication date beyond any reasonable expectation for a product needed now. It is hoped that when the "retrospective" portion of this bibliography has been printed, the concentration will be on filling obvious gaps and on providing current titles. For reasons of expediency, citations included in this bibliography carry a publication date no later than 1974. The only other significant limitation of the bibliography is one of language inasmuch as only works written in French or English have been included. The bibliography, which will appear in a number of issues ofArchivaria because of the length and depth of subject coverage, is presented in a broad subject arrangement. Each broad group is further divided into more specific subject categories. Within each subdivision, items are arranged alphabeti- cally by author or, in cases of anonymous works, by title. The arrangement used moves from general to specific, and finishes with peripheral matters, as follows: 132 ARCHIVARIA 1. General 1.1 Bibliography 1.2 Manuals and general works 1.3 Terminology 1.4 Laws, decrees, and constitution 1.5 Organization and administration 1.6 The profession and archival training 1.7 Archival history and international cooperation 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Archival Theory and Practice: Between Two Paradigms Heather Macneil ∗∗∗
    Archives & Social Studies: A Journal of Interdisciplinary Research Vol. 1, no. 1 (September 2007) Archival Theory and Practice: Between Two Paradigms Heather MacNeil ∗∗∗ Abstract Since 1987, when Hugh Taylor first alerted archivists to the paradigm shift taking place in the archival world, the nature and direction of that shift has become a little clearer. From our present perspective, archival methods seem to be moving toward a closer alignment with archival theory. The principle shaping the new paradigm is respect des fonds; practical adherence to the principle increasingly involves the analysis of the various contexts of documents’ creation in order to better reveal their relation to one another. This analysis is being adopted for the purposes of appraisal and description and is of considerable significance to the archives-records management relationship. ∗ Originally presented as the Keynote Address at the annual meeting of the Association of Canadian Archivists, St. John’s, Newfoundland, 22 July 1993. Revised and edited for publication. First published: Archivaria . N. 37 (Spring 1994). P. 6-20. Reprinted with permission. 517 Heather MacNeil: Archival Theory and Practice: Between Two Paradigms When coupled with accountability, the principle may also provide insights into archives as unique expressions of socio-historical value; and, in that way, assist archivists in determining what is essential to preserve. In the end, whether theory and method are closely aligned and actualized in practice will depend not on the power of the theory, but on the power of individuals, professional organizations, and institutions. Individually and collectively, archivists need to explore the substance of archival work and out of that exploration develop minimum standards of practice built on a foundation of shared principles and assumptions about the nature and value of archives.
    [Show full text]
  • Lisa Cant Final Draft of Senior Thesis Professor Senocak 04/12/2012
    Lisa Cant Final Draft of Senior Thesis Professor Senocak C4997 04/12/2012 How the Preservation of Archives During WWII Led to a Radical Reformation of Strategic Intelligence Efforts Captured documents invariably furnish important and reliable information concerning the enemy which makes it possible to draw conclusions as to his organization, strength, and intentions and which may facilitate our war effort materially. -Captured German Order of the Day, as quoted in MIRS History.1 In 1943, in the midst of World War Two, the Allies established what was perhaps the most unusual and unexpected army unit of the war: the Monuments, Fine Arts and Archives army unit (MFA&A), created not so much to further the war effort but specifically to address the fate of culturally significant objects. The unit notably placed archivists and art specialists within advancing American and British army units.2 Drawn from existing army divisions these volunteers had as their mission the safeguarding of works of art, monumental buildings, and— more significantly for this study—archives, for the preserved archives ultimately produced intelligence that was valuable both to the ongoing war effort and for the post-war administration of Allied occupied Germany. In order to achieve their mission effectively, the embedded archivists had to be on the front lines, as this was where the most damage could be expected to happen. This was also incidentally where the freshest information could be found. This paper will focus on the archives, what they produced, and what happened to them once they were captured. Although the MFA&A division was initially created to find looted objects and protect culturally relevant material including archives, the Military Intelligence Research Section (MIRS), a joint British and American program, recognized the possible intelligence benefits that 1 AGAR-S doc.
    [Show full text]
  • Medline-Sourced Journals Are Indicated in Green) Print-ISSN E-ISSN
    Sourcerecord id Source Title (Medline-sourced journals are indicated in Green) Print-ISSN E-ISSN 18500162600 21st Century Music 15343219 21100404576 2D Materials 20531583 21100447128 3 Biotech 2190572X 21905738 21100779062 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing 23297662 23297670 21100229836 3D Research 20926731 19700200922 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature 01285157 145295 4OR 16194500 16142411 16400154734 A + U-Architecture and Urbanism 03899160 5700161051 A Contrario 16607880 21100399164 A&A case reports 23257237 21100881366 A&A practice 25753126 19600162043 A.M.A. American Journal of Diseases of Children 00968994 19400157806 A.M.A. archives of dermatology 00965359 19600162081 A.M.A. Archives of Dermatology and Syphilology 00965979 19400157807 A.M.A. archives of industrial health 05673933 19600162082 A.M.A. Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Occupational Medicine 00966703 19400157808 A.M.A. archives of internal medicine 08882479 19400158171 A.M.A. archives of neurology 03758540 19400157809 A.M.A. archives of neurology and psychiatry 00966886 19400157810 A.M.A. archives of ophthalmology 00966339 19400157811 A.M.A. archives of otolaryngology 00966894 19400157812 A.M.A. archives of pathology 00966711 19400157813 A.M.A. archives of surgery 00966908 21100456161 a/b: Auto/Biography Studies 21517290 11600153683 A|Z ITU Journal of Faculty of Architecture 13028324 21100780699 A+BE Architecture and the Built Environment 22123202 22147233 5800207606 AAA, Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 01715410 28033 AAC: Augmentative and Alternative
    [Show full text]