Accelerating Wimax System Designs with Fpgas

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Accelerating Wimax System Designs with Fpgas ENGG*6090 Reconfigurable Computing System Topic Review Presentation April 3rd, 2006 Accelerating WiMAX System Designs with FPGAs [Xiaoguang (Shaw) LI][0190094] Instructor: Professor Shawki Areibi Reviewed Papers: 1. WiMAX Opportunities and Challenges in a Wireless World, White Paper developed for the CDMA Development Group, July 2005. 2. IEEE 802.16a Standard and WiMAX Igniting Broadband Wireless Access, Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access Fourm. 3. Telephony’s Complete Guide to WiMAX, WiMAX © Telephony 2004 4. OFDM for wireless communications systems/Ramjee Prasad., p.cm – {Artech House universal personal communications series}, ISBN 1-58053-796-0 5. The principles of OFDM, RF signal processing, January 2001 6. Joaquin Garcia and Rene Cumplido, On the design of an FPGA-Based OFDM modulator for IEEE 802.16-2004, Proceedings of the 2005 International Conference on Reconfigurable Computing and FPGAs, Puebla City, Mexico 7. Maryse Wouters and et al., Real Time Implementation on FPGA of an OFDM based Wireless LAN modem extended with Adaptive Loading, Imec vzw, DESICS, Kapeldreef 75, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium. 8. Accelerating WiMAX System Design with FPGAs, White Paper, Altera, Oct. 2004 9. http://www.xilinx.com/esp/wireless/bfwa/ieee_802_16.htm 10. Kwang-Cheng Chen et al., A Programmable Architecture for OFDM-CDMA, IEEE Communications Maganine, Nov. 1999 2 Outline •Introduction •WiMAX and OFDM •FPGA-based WiMAX system designs •Design Challenges/Objectives •WiMAX solutions with Xilinx FPGAs •WiMAX solutions with Altera FPGAs •A real design of an FPGA-Based OFDM modulator •Results •Conclusion 3 Convergence in Wireless Communication CDMA2000 CDMA W-CDMA GSM CDMA HSDPA TDMA GPRS EDGE Cellular 2G 2.5G 3G 3.5G 3.75G 4G Evolution Convergence 802.16e 802.16d 802.16a 802.16g 802.11b Wireless MAN 802.11g Wireless Proprietary Network Wireless LAN Evolution 1999 2003 2005 2006 Time Introduction 4 Wi-Fi (Wireless Fidelity) •Short for Wireless Fidelity and is meant to be used generically when referring to any type of 802.11 network, whether 802.11b, 802.11a, 802.11g, dual-band, etc. Disadvantages: •Security- greater exposure to risks •Speed – Slower than cable •802.11b: 1 to 11 Mbps •802.11g: run at 54 Mbps, but realistically about 20-25 Mbps and about 14 Mbps when b associated. •Range – Affected by various medium •802.11a: Indoor 40 to 300 feet; outdoor 100 to 1000 feet •802.11b: Indoor 100 to 300feet; outdoor 400 to 1500 feet Introduction 5 IEEEIEEE 802.16802.16 StandardsStandards (WiMAX (Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access) is a trade name of a group of IEEE 802.16 Standards) 802.16 802.16a/REVd 802.16e Completed Dec. 2001 802.16a: Jan. 2003 Dec. 2005 802.16 REVd: Q3 2004 Spectrum 10 to 66 GHz <11 GHz <6GHz Channel Line-of-Sight only Non line-of-sight Non line-of-sight Conditions Bit Rate 32 to 134 Mb/s at Up to 75 Mb/s at 20 MHz Up to 15 Mb/s at 28 MHz channelization 5 MHz channelization channelization Modulation QPSK, 16QAM OFDM 256, OFDMA 64 QAM, Same as ERVd and 64 QAM 16QAM, QPSK,BPSK Mobility Fixed Fixed and Portable Mobility, Regional Roaming Channel 20, 25 and 28 MHz Selectable channel bandwidths Same as REVd Bandwidths between 1.25 and 20 MHz, with up to 16 logical sub-channels Typical Cell 1 to 3 miles 3 to 5 miles; Maximum range 30 1 to 3 miles Radius miles based on tower height, antenna gain and transmit power 6 WiMAX Milestones & Roadmap Introduction 7 Single Carrier Modulation – Time Domain Signal time Carrier time Introduction 8 Single Carrier Modulation – Frequency Domain Unmodulated Carrier Signal frequency Baseband Modulated Carrier Signal frequency Baseband Introduction Baseband 9 Problem: Data transmission over multiple channels •In classical terrestrial broadcasting scenario, we have to deal with a multiple-channel: the transmitted signal arrives at the receiver in various paths of different length. •Since multiple versions of the signal interfere with each (inter symbol interference (ISI)), it becomes very hard to extract the original information. •Channel impulse response: the signal at the receiver f a single pulse is transmitted. •A received symbol can theoretically be influenced by τ max / T previous symbols. •This influence has to be estimated and compensated for in the receiver. Introduction 10 Single Carrier Approach A scenario that is characterized by the following conditions: 1 •Transmission Rate: R = = 7.4Msym / s T •Maximum channel delay: τ max = 224µS τ For the single carrier system, this results in an ISI of: max ≈1600 T The complexity involved in removing this interference in the receiver is tremendous. In the scenario under consideration here, using an approach will only lead to sub-optimal results. This is the main reason why the multi carrier approach becomes so popular. Introduction 11 Multi Carrier Approach •The original data stream of rate R is multiplexed into N parallel data streams of rate R mc = 1 / T mc = R / N each of the data streams is modulated with a different frequency and the results signal s are transmitted together in the same band. τ τ The ISI for each sub system reduces to max = max τ T N •T •If N=8192, ISI is max = 0.2 mc Tmc •Such little ISI can often be tolerated and no extra counter measure such as an equalizer is needed. However, the complexity of a receiver with 8192 parallel paths still isn’t feasible. This is why OFDM comes to the picture. Introduction 12 Spectral Efficiency of OFDM Signal Introduction 13 Design Challenges •Performance (Processing Speed) •WiMAX requires higher throughput and data rate than those in cellular systems. •WiMAX utilizes advanced signal processing techniques, such as Turbo coding/decoding, FFT/IFFT, beam forming, MIMO, CFR, and PDP which are very computationally intensive and require billion MAC per second. •WiMAX requires hardware platform that must have significant processing abilities. •Flexibility (Reprogrammability) •WiMAX standards are still evolving. •Interoperability and compliance testing are in the early stages. •Requirement to adapt systems: Throughout the development cycle including after deployment in the field. FPGA-based WiMAX System Designs 14 Design Challenges cont. •Time-to-Market •Many new players have emerged. •WiMAX is an emerging technology, time-to-market is a key differentiator for OEMs looking for early success gaining market share. •This has a direct effect on the development cycle and choice of hardware platform, with designers requiring easy-to-use development tools, software, boards, and off-the-shelf IP and reference designs in order to accelerate the system design. •Low cost •Need low cost points to help drive rapid adoption of technology. •Need a way to reduce costs once standards mature and when loss of small degree of flexibility is acceptable (Structured ASIC). •Power Dissipation •Despite the demanding performance requirements power dissipation must be as low as possible. FPGA-based WiMAX System Designs 15 Technology Comparison Technology Performance Cost Power Flexibility Memory BW I/O BW GPP LOW LOW HIGH HIGH LOW LOW PDSP Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium LOW ASIC HIGH HIGH LOW LOW HIGH HIGH FPGA Med-High LOW Low-Medium HIGH HIGH HIGH FPGA-based WiMAX System Designs 16 •Virtex-4 FPGAs (LX, FX, and SX) LX: High Performance Logic •Highest Logic-to-Feature ratio •Highest I/O-to-Feature ratio •SX: Ultra-high-performance signal processing •Highest DSP-to-Feature ratio •Highest Memory-to-Feature ratio •FX: Embedded processing and high-speed serial connectivity •Embedded IBM PowerPC processor and Ethernet MAC •Rocket IO multi-gigabit serial transceivers FPGA-based WiMAX System Designs 17 Embedded DSP Blocks ¾Most powerful embedded DSP capability in FPGA industry ¾Pipeline registers enable 500 MHz performance ¾Cascade logic enables sustained 500 MHz performance throughout DSP column ¾Build high-speed multi-level filters using DSP slices FPGA-based WiMAX System Designs 18 Virtex-4 FX: Immersed PowerPC with APU •New Auxiliary Processing Unit (APU) •Direct interface from CPU pipeline to FPGA logic •Simplifies integration of Coprocessor an hardware accelerator •APU Acceleration •Reduce number of bus cycles by factor of 10X •Increase performance by over 20X FPGA-based WiMAX System Designs 19 Off-the-Shelf IPS for WiMAX FPGA-based WiMAX System Designs 20 Xilinx DSP Design Tools and Flow DSP System Simulation Real-time Debug (using ChipScope) MATLAB/Simulink HDL Co-Simulation ModelSim ISE PCI, JTAG Implementation Simulate HDL Hardware Modules in-the-loop FPGA-based WiMAX System Designs 21 Flexibility Feature from Altera •Additional protocol support is required to ensure compatibility with future products. •Enhancements or bug fixes are necessary. •Send an update from the development location through a network to the Stratix II device. •Store the update in the memory. •Update the Stratix II device with the new data. FPGA-based WiMAX System Designs 22 Altera’s Low Cost Solution: Structured ASIC Structured ASICs leverage standard- cell technology and the most advanced semiconductor processes to embed logic and hard functions— such as memory, phase-locked loops (PLLs), clock networks, and power bussing—into pre-engineered, pre- verified base layers. The structured ASIC is customized using just the top metal layers. The result is a device that meets today’s performance requirements for advanced systems in much less time and at a much lower NRE costs. FPGA-based WiMAX System Designs 23 Altera’s Structured ASIC Cont. The 90-nm HardCopy ® II family is built on an array of fine-grained on average 40 percent structured cells, called HCells, that less power and 40% delivers the density, low cost, and faster than their high performance required for high- equivalent FPGAs volume advanced systems. HCells are grouped into HCell macros to implement a portion of a Stratix® II adaptive logic module (ALM) or a section of a digital signal processing (DSP) block.
Recommended publications
  • Evaluation of Mobile Wimax and Intelligent Video for Enhanced Rail Transit Safety
    SharpRAIL: Evaluation of Mobile WiMAX and Intelligent Video for Enhanced Rail Transit Safety Report Number FTA-MD-26-7132-08.1 June 2008 DISCLAIMER NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the United States Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration, in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers' names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the contents of the report. Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED June, 2008 Final Report, April 2007-January 2008 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS SharpRAIL: Evaluation of Mobile WiMAX and Intelligent Video for Enhanced Rail Transit Safety MD-26-7132-00 6. AUTHOR(S) Santosh Kesavan, Eddie Wu and William Toeller 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) REPORT NUMBER VT Aepco Inc 555 Quince Orchard Road, Suite 488 Gaithersburg, MD 20878 9.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of IEEE 802.16 and Wimax Multicast Delivery
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Calhoun, Institutional Archive of the Naval Postgraduate School Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 2007-09 An analysis of IEEE 802.16 and WiMAX multicast delivery Staub, Patrick A. Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/3203 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS AN ANALYSIS OF IEEE 802.16 AND WIMAX MULTICAST DELIVERY by Patrick A. Staub September, 2007 Thesis Advisor: Bert Lundy Second Reader: George Dinolt Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED September 2007 Master’s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE An Analysis of IEEE 802.16 and WiMAX 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Multicast Delivery 6. AUTHOR(S) Patrick A. Staub 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8.
    [Show full text]
  • IEEE 802.20: Mobile Broadband Wireless Access a Technical Overview
    IEEE 802.20: Mobile Broadband Wireless Access A Technical Overview June 2006 for ITU-BDT Regional Seminar on Mobile and Fixed Wireless Access for Broadband Applications for the ARAB Seminar, June 19-22, 2006, Algiers, Algeria • The following is a technical overview of the IEEE 802.20 (FDD & TDD) proposed specification and how it compares to IEEE 802.16e (mobile WiMAX). • The presentation does not cover the IEEE Working Group processes relating to standardization. • I will not be making any comments today on the IEEE 802.20 standardization process or its current status. 1 1 Introduction • The 802.20 standard is being developed by the IEEE for highly efficient Mobile Broadband Wireless Access (MBWA) – Spectral efficiencies, sustained user data rates and numbers of active users that are significantly higher than other emerging mobile systems – Efficient packet based air interface optimized for IP-data transport, including real time services • Technology developed to target worldwide deployment of affordable, ubiquitous, always-on networks – To meet the needs of business and residential end user markets • 802.20 provides a specification for physical and medium access control layers for interoperable mobile wireless access systems – Operations for licensed bands below 3.5 GHz – Supports mobility classes up to 250 Km/h 2 Mobile Broadband Vision 3G and Beyond Best Connected Service: • Application-specific air interfaces CDMA2000, WPAN WCDMA, MPROC 802.20, FLO… MPROC • New OFDM(A) Physical GPRS, WLAN layers GPS DSP 3D Graphics • Common IP-based core DSP Video Audio network Memory Memory Imaging WLAN • Integrated WAN / LAN (802.11n) services • Multimode devices Mobile WAN/MAN Relative (Flash-OFDM, HSXPA, 802.20/3GPP2 Phase 2, LTE) Peak Rates Mobile Broadcast (FLO) Relative Coverage Data rates (vertical) and network coverage (horizontal) are illustrative only.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit 3 Basics of Network Technology
    UNIT 3 BASICS OF NETWORK TECHNOLOGY Structure 3.0 Objectives 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Network Concept and Classification 3.2.1 Advantages of Networks 3.2.2 Network Classification 3.3 Local Area Network (LAN) Overview 3.3.1 LAN Topologies 3.3.2 LAN Access Methods 3.4 Wide Area Network 3.4.1 WAN Topologies 3.4.2 WAN Switching Methods 3.4.3 WAN Devices/Hardware 3.5 Wireless Technology 3.5.1 WiFi 3.5.2 WiMax 3.6 Summary 3.7 Answers to Self Check Exercises 3.8 Keywords 3.9 References and Further Reading 3.0 OBJECTIVES After going through this Unit, you will be able to: explain the concept of computer networks; understand different application of networks; differentiate between different types of computer networks based on size, connection and functioning; compare the different network topologies used in LAN and WAN; understand the working of LAN access methods; explain the working of networking devices used in WAN; know the importance of using networked system; and understand the concept of wireless technologies and standards. 3.1 INTRODUCTION With the ICT revolution the functioning of organisations has changed drastically. In a networked scenario organisations often need several people (may be at different locations) to input and process data simultaneously. In order to achieve this, a computer-networking model in which a number of separate but interconnected computers do the job has replaced the earlier standalone-computing model. By linking individual computers over 4 7 Network Fundamentals a network their productivity has been increased enormously. A most distinguishing characteristic of a general computer network is that data can enter or leave at any point and can be processed at any workstation.
    [Show full text]
  • IX256 Wimax Modem User Manual.P65
    ZTE IX256 WiMAX MODEM User Manual 1 No part of this publication may be excerpted, reproduced, translated in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without the prior written authorization of ZTE Corporation. The manual is published by ZTE Corporation. We reserve the right to make modifications on print errors or update specifications without prior notice. Copyright © 2010 by ZTE Corporation All rights reserved. Version: V1.0 Date: Aug. 2010 Manual number: 079584501965 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 General ............................................................................................................................ 6 1.1 Welcome ................................................................................................................ 6 1.2 Safety Precautions ................................................................................................ 6 1.3 Cleaning and Maintaining ....................................................................................... 7 1.4 Limited Warranty.................................................................................................... 7 1.5 Limitation of Liability ............................................................................................... 8 2 Getting Started .............................................................................................................. 9 2.1 Appearance........................................................................................................... 9 2.2 Parts
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Wifi and Wimax and Wireless Network Coexistence
    International Journal of Computer Networks & Communications (IJCNC) Vol.6, No.6, November 2014 ANALYSIS OF WIFI AND WIMAX AND WIRELESS NETWORK COEXISTENCE Shuang Song and Biju Issac School of Computing, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK ABSTRACT Wireless networks are very popular nowadays. Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) that uses the IEEE 802.11 standard and WiMAX (Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access) that uses the IEEE 802.16 standard are networks that we want to explore. WiMAX has been developed over 10 years, but it is still unknown to most people. However compared to WLAN, it has many advantages in transmission speed and coverage area. This paper will introduce these two technologies and make comparisons between WiMAX and WiFi. In addition, wireless network coexistence of WLAN and WiMAX will be explored through simulation. Lastly we want to discuss the future of WiMAX in relation to WiFi. KEY WORDS WiMAX, WiFi, wireless network, wireless coexistence, network simulation 1. INTRODUCTION With the development of multimedia communication, people need wireless broadband access with higher speed, larger coverage and mobility. The emergence of WiMAX (Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access) technology met the people's demand for wireless Internet to some extent. If wireless LAN technology (WLAN) solves the access problem of the "last one hundred meters", then WiMAX technology is the best access solution of the "last mile". Though WiMAX is an emerging and extremely competitive wireless broadband access technology, the development prospects of its market is still unknown. Hybrid networks as a supplement to cell based or IP packet based services, can fully reflect the characteristics of wide network coverage.
    [Show full text]
  • Performance Evaluation of Wi-Fi Comparison with Wimax Networks
    International Journal of Distributed and Parallel Systems (IJDPS) Vol.3, No.1, January 2012 Performance Evaluation of Wi-Fi comparison with WiMAX Networks 1M.Sreerama Murty, 2 D.Veeraiah, 3A.Srinivas Rao 1Department of Computer Science and Engineering Sai Spurthi Institute of Technology,Khammam,Andhra Pradesh,India [email protected] 2Department of Computer Science and Engineering Sai Spurthi Institute of Technology,Khamamm,Andhra Pradesh,India [email protected] 3Department of Computer Science and Engineering Sai Spurthi Institute of Technology,Khamamm,Andhra Pradesh,India [email protected] Abstract Wireless networking has become an important area of research in academic and industry. The main objectives of this paper is to gain in-depth knowledge about the Wi-Fi- WiMAX technology and how it works and understand the problems about the WiFi- WiMAX technology in maintaining and deployment. The challenges in wireless networks include issues like security, seamless handover, location and emergency services, cooperation, and QoS.The performance of the WiMAX is better than the Wi-Fi and also it provide the good response in the access. It’s evaluated the Quality of Service (Qos) in Wi-Fi compare with WiMAX and provides the various kinds of security Mechanisms. Authentication to verify the identity of the authorized communicating client stations. Confidentiality (Privacy) to secure that the wirelessly conveyed information will remain private and protected. Take necessary actions and configurations that are needed in order to deploy Wi-Fi -WiMAX with increased levels of security and privacy Keywords Wifi ,Wimax,Qos,Security,Privacy,seamless 1. Introduction Recently wireless networking has become an important area of research in academia and industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Motorola's Wimax System
    SURFboard® SBG6580 Series Wi-Fi®Cable Modem Gateway Strengthen your broadband leadership — Count on Motorola’s SURFboard DOCSIS®/ EuroDOCSIS 3.0 solutions to help you deliver innovative, ultra-broadband data services and advanced high-bandwidth home networking to your premium customers. Motorola’s Service Assured DOCSIS 3.0 Solutions enable you to deliver increased bandwidth, enhance security, and cost-effectively deploy data services to your bandwidth-demanding consumers – all while maximizing current infrastructure investment and lowering capital spending. Next Generation High-Bandwidth Services and Home Networking in a Stylish Package The SBG6580 SURFboard Wi-Fi Cable Modem Gateway enables the delivery of innovative ultra-broadband data and multimedia services as well as high-bandwidth home networking. Designed for seamless mobility, Motorola’s SBG6580 is a fully integrated all-in-one home networking solution that combines the functionality of a DOCSIS/EuroDOCSIS 3.0 cable modem, four-port 10/100/1000 Ethernet switch with advanced firewall, and an 802.11n Wi-Fi access point in a sleek, stylish package for the sophisticated consumer. It’s the perfect networking solution for the home, home office, or small business, allowing users to create a custom network to share a single ultra-broadband connection, files, and networked peripherals using wired or Wi-Fi connectivity. Cost-effective, efficient, and secure, the SBG6580 enables users to maximize the potential of their existing resources, while benefiting from next generation high-bandwidth services. Increased Data Rates Utilizing the power of DOCSIS 3.0, the SBG6580 enables channel bonding of up to 8 downstream and 4 upstream channels – which allows an operator to offer their customers advanced multimedia services, capable of data rates of well over 300 Mbps in DOCSIS and 400 Mbps in EuroDOCSIS in the received (downstream) data stream and over 100 Mbps in the send (upstream) data stream.
    [Show full text]
  • MSC8157/MSC8157E Broadband Wireless Access DSP Advanced 45 Nm, Six-Core DSP for 3G-LTE (FDD and TDD), HSPA+, LTE Advanced and Wimax Base Station
    Digital Signal Processors MSC8157/MSC8157E Broadband Wireless Access DSP Advanced 45 nm, six-core DSP for 3G-LTE (FDD and TDD), HSPA+, LTE Advanced and WiMAX base station Overview The MSC8157/MSC8157E DSP delivers a The MSC8157/MSC8157E embeds 6 MB The MSC8157/MSC8157E is a six-core DSP high level of performance and integration, of internal memory and supports a variety based on Freescale’s new SC3850 StarCore combining six fully programmable new of advanced, high-speed interface types, ® technology and designed to advance the and enhanced SC3850 DSP cores, each including two Serial RapidIO interfaces, capabilities of wireless broadband equipment. running at up to 1 GHz with an architecture two Gigabit Ethernet interfaces for network ® It delivers industry-leading performance and highly optimized for wireless infrastructure communications, a PCI Express controller, power savings, leveraging 45 nm process applications. Developed by Freescale and one DDR controller for high-speed, industry technology in a highly integrated DSP to integrated on chip, the second-generation standard memory interface and six common provide performance equivalent to 6 GHz MAPLE-B2 baseband accelerator supports public radio interfaces (CPRI). of a single-core device. The MSC8157/ hardware acceleration for Turbo and Viterbi MSC8157E will help equipment manufacturers channel decoding, Turbo encoding and and carriers create solutions and services that rate matching, MIMO MMSE, IRC and ML enable near-term, mainstream adoption of equalization schemes, matrix inversion, CRC next-generation wireless standards such as insertion and check, DFT/iDFT and FFT/iFFT 3G-LTE (FDD and TDD), HSPA+ LTE Advanced calculations and chip rate acceleration.
    [Show full text]
  • Bluetooth, WI-FI, Cellular and Wimax 1Omendri Kumari and 2Dr
    IJCSC Volume 5 • Number 2 July-Sept 2014 pp. 61-70 ISSN-0973-7391 Study of Wireless Communication Technologies: Bluetooth, WI-FI, Cellular and WiMAX 1Omendri kumari and 2Dr. Sanjay Kumar 1,2School of Engineering & Technology, Jaipur National University, Jaipur [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT A rush forward of research activities in wireless communication has been seen in last decade. There are new points of view on how to communicate effectively over wireless channels from this research drive. The purpose or aim of this paper is to study the basics as well as new research developments. We studied four types of wireless communication technology that are Bluetooth, Cellular, Wi-Fi and WiMAX in this paper. we have described architecture and working of these technologies to understand them easily. we have concluded which one is the best through comparative study and analysis. KEYWORDS: WIRELESS COMMUNICATION, BLUETOOTH, WI-FI, WIMAX, CELLULAR. 1. INTRODUCTION With the rapid development of communication technologies, future wireless communication systems should support voice, data, audio/video, multimedia, interactive games, and Internet traffic. A potential solution for this is to make the wireless communication network and the broadcasting network converge to form a unified convergence network. Wireless communications is, by any measure, the fastest growing segment of the communications industry. [1] As such, it has captured the attention of the media and the imagination of the public. Cellular phones have experienced exponential growth over the last decade, and this growth continues unabated worldwide, with more than a billion worldwide cell phone users projected in the near future.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Ieee 802.11/Wlan and Ieee 802.16/Wimax Networks
    ANSARI LAYOUT 2/9/10 1:50 PM Page 30 WIRELESS TECHNOLOGIES FOR E-HEALTHCARE WIRELESS TELEMEDICINE SERVICES OVER INTEGRATED IEEE 802.11/WLAN AND IEEE 802.16/WIMAX NETWORKS YAN ZHANG AND NIRWAN ANSARI, NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY HIROSHI TSUNODA, TOHOKU INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ABSTRACT Wireless communications overcomes most geo- graphical, temporal, and organizational barriers Wireless telemedicine, also referred to as to the transfer of medical data and records. nic mobile health, which capitalizes on advances of In order to provide ubiquitous availability of wireless technologies to deliver health care and multimedia services and applications, wireless and exchange medical knowledge anywhere and any mobile technologies are evolving towards integra- BS2 time, overcomes most of geographical, temporal, tion of heterogeneous access networks such as and even organizational barriers to facilitate wireless personal area networks (WPANs), wire- remote diagnosis and monitoring, and transfer of less local area networks (WLANs), wireless WiMAX core networ medical data and records. In this article we metropolitan area networks (WMANs) as well as investigate the application of integrated IEEE third-generation (3G) and beyond 3G cellular 802.16/WiMAX and IEEE 802.11/WLAN broad- networks. A hybrid network based on IEEE band wireless access technologies along with the 802.11/WLANs and IEEE 802.16/WiMAX is a Internet related protocol issues for telemedicine services. strong contender since both technologies are We first review IEEE 802.11/WLAN and IEEE designed to provide ubiquitous low cost, high- 802.16/WiMAX technologies, and make a com- speed data rates, quality of service (QoS) provi- parison between IEEE 802.11/WLAN and IEEE sioning, and broadband wireless Internet access.
    [Show full text]
  • The Architectural Differences Between LTE and Wimax
    The architectural differences between LTE and WiMAX Tingnan Bao (841229-1737) School of Information and Communication Technology KTH Stockholm, Sweden 16453 [email protected] Abstract—the paper presents the modern communication technology in wireless network, LTE and WiMAX. The system architectures between LTE and WiMAX network will be shown. In addition, a comparison of the system architecture and the air interface of these two networks will be discussed. The paper further concludes with discussion of these two aspects and gives the short look into the future 4G networks. Keywords— LTE; WiMAX; 4G;system architecture; air interface I. INTRODUCTION With the development of high-speed mobile broadband access technology, there are two emerging technologies: Long Term Evolution (LTE), which is developed by 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) and WiMAX, standardized by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). Both of them have similar goals, specifically to provide high data rate wireless network connection for cell phones, laptops, and other electronic devices. Nevertheless, the system architecture of these two is different, so that the scope of applications, network services, market positions differ. During November 2004, 3GPP launched the LTE project, which focuses on enhancing Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (UTRA) and optimizing 3GPP’s radio access architecture in order to compete with WiMAX. [1] In this standard, LTE is referred as the Evolved Packet System (EPS), purely IP based, which divided into two parts: the Evolved Packet Core (EPC) and the Enhanced-UMTS Terrestrial Radio Access Network (E-UTRAN). However, LTE is also described as 3.9G as the first release of LTE did not fulfill ITU’s requirements for 4G, such as the peak data rates up to 1 Gb/s.
    [Show full text]