DOCSLIB.ORG

4 Lords and Masters

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
4 Lords and Masters 4 Lords and Masters Most rural Jews were not self-employed entrepreneurs, but were dependent on, and/ or served in one way or another (mostly as leaseholders) their landlords, who were private persons, mainly Polish and Lithuanian nobles, and various institutions. This was a direct continuation of the situation in the late Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, although with changes in the land ownership structure which had occurred under Czarist Russian rule. These changes included the penetration of Russian landowners into former Polish territories, and the abolition of the nobles’ monopoly on land ownership. These opened a way for non-noble landowners (including Jewish ones) to acquire land in the region. The other changes were: stripping the Uniate (Greek-Catholic) Church of most of its property and giving it to the Orthodox church in 1805, and a distinction between Imperial estates (udel’nyye zemli) and treasury estates (kazionnyye zemli), which did not exist under Polish rule. However, it should be taken into account that the eviction lists were composed after the 1807 Treaty of Tilsit when Polish nobles in the service of Napoleonic Grand Duchy of Warsaw were not regarded as Russia’s enemies. The connection between Jews and Polish-Lithuanian magnates is, of course, one of the best-studied topics in the history of the Polish-Lithuanian Jewry204, and I have personally contributed several studies on the economic connections between Polish Jews and various churches in the pre-partition period205. All these studies, however, are based either upon private magnates’ archives or ecclesiastic archives and do not provide a full picture. Thus, it should be stressed that the eviction lists for 1808 held in Minsk and used for this study provide us, for the first time, with complete information about the distribution within a relatively large region of rural Jews along with different groups of their lords and masters. The private landlords of the Jews were of three kinds: 214 Polish-Lithuanian nobles (see table 4.1), 26 Russian dignitaries (see table 4.2), and 3 non-noble merchants (see table 4.3). The institutional landlords were either ecclesiastic institutions (16 monasteries, 6 parish churches, 2 bishops and 2 priests: see table 4.4) or administrators of public lands (22 imperial estates, 3 treasury land-tracts, and 2 municipal land- tracts: see table 4.5). The three groups of private employers were heterogeneous. Most of the members of the first group, were either Lithuanian magnates, or Belarusian 204 The principal studies on this subject are Rosman, Moshe, Lords’ Jews: Magnate-Jewish Relations in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth during the Eighteenth Century, Cambridge (Mass.), 1990 and Teller, Adam, Kesef, Koaḥ VeHshpa’a: HaYehudim BeAḥuzot Beit Radziwiłł BeLita BaMea Ha-18, Jeru- salem, 2006. 205 Kalik, Judith, “Patterns of Contacts between the Catholic Church and the Jews in Polish-Lithua- nian Commonwealth during the 17-18th Centuries: Jewish Debts” in: Studies in the History of the Jews in Old Poland in Honor of Jacob Goldberg , ed. A. Teller, Jerusalem (Scripta Hierosolymitana 38), 1998, pp.102-122; Kalik, Judith, Economic Relations between the Catholic Church and the Jews in the Polish- Lithuanian Commonwealth in the 17th-18 th Centuries, Gal-ed 23, 2012, pp. 15-36. Lords and Masters 133 nobles of boyar origin. Ethnic Polish magnates were a minority. The second group were predominantly German, Danish, Scottish, or Georgian in origin, although there were a few ethnic Russians. It is not easy to distinguish between these two groups of landowners, since many Polish magnates held high positions in the Russian administration, and some of them were even newcomers whose estates were granted to them by the Russian authorities. Thus, Prince Adam Czartoryski served as the Russian Foreign Minister from 1804 to 1806, and the widow of the Polish General Jόzef Zabiełło, who was hanged by Kościuszko rebels as a Russian spy, received estates in Belarus as a reward for her late husband’s service. The third group of private landlords consisted of one Jewish, one English, and one Belarusian merchant. The Polish nobles belonged to two distinct groups: the so-called magnates, i.e. the members of the senatorial families, and local middle nobles, members of the szlachta. In their relations with Jews, however, the distinction between large landowners holding hundreds of Jews and small landowners with one or two Jewish leaseholders followed different lines. Many “magnates” were junior members of senatorial families and had little property in Minsk Guberniya, while many local powerful potentates, though not being “magnates” per se, dominated some Jewish communities. All in all, 82 magnates controlled 2808 Jews of both sexes in 690 villages, while 341 middle nobles controlled 1460 Jews in 133 villages. In other words, Polish nobles controlled 82% of all rural Jews in Minsk Guberniya in 1808, 54% of the Jews served the magnates, and 28% served the middle nobles. However, 28 “magnates” possessed just one village with one Jewish leaseholder. Many of these nobles bore the court titles of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, which were mostly already obsolete under the Russian rule. 4.1 Polish-Lithuanian Magnates The largest landlords, quite naturally, were the members of the Lithuanian aristocratic family of Radziwiłł, the richest magnates of the former Grand Duchy of Lithuania. The 11th Prince-Ordynat of Nesvizh, Dominik Radziwiłł, alone controlled 686 Jews of both sexes, including members of their families in 168 villages. Only 61 of them belonged to the ordynacja of Nesvizh, while the remainder were scattered through his other estates in the districts of Slutsk, Bobruisk, Borisov, Minsk, and Mozyr’. The composition of the eviction lists in 1808 coincided with the dynastic crisis in the Radziwiłł family. In 1807 Dominik Radziwiłł married Elżbieta Mniszek, but 14 days after the wedding he fled the Nesvizh castle with his married cousin Teofila Starzeńska (née Morawska), who gave birth in 1808 to their illegitimate son Aleksander. Dominik and Teofila married only in 1809 after costly divorces with their previous spouses, and at the end of the same year their legitimate daughter Stefania was born. When Dominik Radziwiłł fell in action at the battle of Hanau in 1813 fighting on the side of Napoleon, his premarital son Aleksander was disinherited, and Stefania became his sole heiress. The ordynacja of Nesvizh, as a primogeniture possession, passed then to the Radziwiłł family, 134 Lords and Masters namely to the Prince-Ordynat of Ołyka, Antoni Radziwiłł, while Stefania inherited the remainder of her father’s estates. Stefania was raised in St. Petersburg under the patronage of the Dowager Empress Maria Fedorovna (née Sophia von Württemberg), widow of Czar Paul a distant relative of hers. Antoni Radziwiłł planned to marry Stefania to his son, Ferdynand, in order to reunite the Radziwiłł family possessions in Belarus, but Ferdynand died in 1827. In 1828 the Dowager Empress arranged Stefania’s marriage with Ludwig von Wittgenstein, who had been involved in 1825 in the Decembrist conspiracy, but thanks to the Empress’s protection was not only pardoned, but received the richest bride in Europe in marriage. Two lists of the Jewish subjects of von Wittgenstein in district of Slutsk from 1848 and 1852 have survived.206 Wittgenstein’s estates were inherited by Ludwig and Stefania’s son Peter, who died in 1887 without issue, and his possessions passed to his sister Maria, who married Prince Chlodwig zu Hohenloe in 1847, Governor of Alsace-Lorraine and future Chancellor of the German Empire (1894-1900). However, in 1887 Czar Alexander III passed an edict forbidding foreign citizens from inheriting lands in the Russian Empire, and so Princess Maria was forced to sell her estates piecemeal to Russian nationals. This was the end of Dominik Radziwiłł’s possessions in Minsk Guberniya. Antoni Radziwiłł controlled in 1808 only twelve Jews in three villages in district of Pinsk, since his main estates were located in Volhynia in the ordynacja of Ołyka. In 1813 he became the 12th Prince-Ordynat of Nesvizh. The ordynacja of Nesvizh continued to exist until 1939. Antoni Radziwiłł settled in Prussia in 1796, where he served as the Governor of Grand Duchy of Poznań from 1815 to 1831. After his death in 1832 his son, the Prussian general Wilhelm inherited the ordynacja of Nesvizh. In 1870 Wilhelm’s son Antoni became the 14th Prince-Ordynat of Nesvizh and in 1874 he also inherited the ordynacja of Kletsk. The 9th Prince-Ordynat of Kletsk Jόzef Radziwiłł controlled 169 Jews in 56 villages in 1808, mostly in the ordynacja of Kletsk, but also in the district of Mozyr’. Since his only son, Antoni died 1810 without issue, the ordynacja of Kletsk passed after his death in 1813 to his brother Michał, who controlled 288 Jews in 47 villages in the district of Borisov in 1808. Michał died in 1831 and the ordynacja of Kletsk passed to his grandson Leon, who died childless in 1874. The primogeniture holding was therefore inherited by Antoni, the Prince-Ordynat of Niesvizh, and thus both ordynacjas were united until their dissolution in 1939. An unnamed Princess Radziwiłłowa was another member of Radziwiłł clan mentioned in the eviction lists of 1808, a landlady of just four Jews in two villages in district of Minsk. This was probably Julia, the unmarried daughter of Dominik Radziwiłł from the so-called Annopol branch of the Radziwiłł family, who later married Andzej Prόszyński. All in all five
Load more

Recommended publications
  • From the History of Polish-Austrian Diplomacy in the 1970S
    PRZEGLĄD ZACHODNI I, 2017 AGNIESZKA KISZTELIŃSKA-WĘGRZYŃSKA Łódź FROM THE HISTORY OF POLISH-AUSTRIAN DIPLOMACY IN THE 1970S. AUSTRIAN CHANCELLOR BRUNO KREISKY’S VISITS TO POLAND Polish-Austrian relations after World War II developed in an atmosphere of mutu- al interest and restrained political support. During the Cold War, the Polish People’s Republic and the Republic of Austria were on the opposite sides of the Iron Curtain; however, after 1945 both countries sought mutual recognition and trade cooperation. For more than 10 years following the establishment of diplomatic relations between Austria and Poland, there had been no meetings at the highest level.1 The first con- tact took place when the then Minister of Foreign Affairs, Bruno Kreisky, came on a visit to Warsaw on 1-3 March 1960.2 Later on, Kreisky visited Poland four times as Chancellor of Austria: in June 1973, in late January/early February 1975, in Sep- tember 1976, and in November 1979. While discussing the significance of those five visits, it is worth reflecting on the role of Austria in the diplomatic activity of the Polish Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA). The views on the motives of the Austrian politician’s actions and on Austria’s foreign policy towards Poland come from the MFA archives from 1972-1980. The time period covered in this study matches the schedule of the Chancellor’s visits. The activity of the Polish diplomacy in the Communist period (1945-1989) has been addressed as a research topic in several publications on Polish history. How- ever, as Andrzej Paczkowski says in the sixth volume of Historia dyplomacji polskiej (A history of Polish diplomacy), research on this topic is still in its infancy.3 A wide range of source materials that need to be thoroughly reviewed offer a number of 1 Stosunki dyplomatyczne Polski, Informator, vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Dress and Cultural Difference in Early Modern Europe European History Yearbook Jahrbuch Für Europäische Geschichte
    Dress and Cultural Difference in Early Modern Europe European History Yearbook Jahrbuch für Europäische Geschichte Edited by Johannes Paulmann in cooperation with Markus Friedrich and Nick Stargardt Volume 20 Dress and Cultural Difference in Early Modern Europe Edited by Cornelia Aust, Denise Klein, and Thomas Weller Edited at Leibniz-Institut für Europäische Geschichte by Johannes Paulmann in cooperation with Markus Friedrich and Nick Stargardt Founding Editor: Heinz Duchhardt ISBN 978-3-11-063204-0 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-063594-2 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-063238-5 ISSN 1616-6485 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 04. International License. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. Library of Congress Control Number:2019944682 Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston The book is published in open access at www.degruyter.com. Typesetting: Integra Software Services Pvt. Ltd. Printing and Binding: CPI books GmbH, Leck Cover image: Eustaţie Altini: Portrait of a woman, 1813–1815 © National Museum of Art, Bucharest www.degruyter.com Contents Cornelia Aust, Denise Klein, and Thomas Weller Introduction 1 Gabriel Guarino “The Antipathy between French and Spaniards”: Dress, Gender, and Identity in the Court Society of Early Modern
    [Show full text]
  • Lyakhovichi Was a Small Jewish Shtetl in Eastern Europe Ruled by Four Different Nations Over the Years
    Lyakhovichi, Home to our Busel Ancestors Judy Duchan February 29, 2016 Lyakhovichi was a small Jewish shtetl in Eastern Europe ruled by four different nations over the years. The town still exists, but it is no longer a Jewish shtetl. In its earliest days it was part of the Lithuania. Later, in 1772, because of various agreements and partitions among Eastern and Central European countries it was part of Poland. Then in 1795, when Poland was partitioned once again, it became part of Russia. During the Second World War the Jews of the town either left or were killed. The very latest geographic change for Lyakhovichi took place in 1991 when Belarussians declared themselves a free country, separate from the Soviet Union. Lyakhovichi then became part of Belarus, as it is today. These historic changes of Lyakhovichi’s are apparent when googling Lyakhovichi. The town shows up under various names and spellings: Lyakhovichi (Russian and Bellorussian), Lachowicze (Lithuanian and Polish), or Lechowitz (Yiddish). As it was in the day of our grandmother, Lyakhovichi is located on the route between the larger cities of Minsk and Pinsk, and even larger cities Warsaw and Moscow. Because of its strategic location it has played an outsized role throughout its history. Napoleon went through Lyachovichi on his way to Moscow in 1812, and during World War I it was the scene of heavy fighting between Russia and Germany. Here is an account its World War I role: 1915. The Germans are invading Russia. Every day there continues through Lechowitz a stream of covered wagons.
    [Show full text]
  • Irina Černākova Vodlozerie
    „Przeszłość Demograficzna Polski” 38, 2016, nr 1 DOI: 10.18276/pdp.2016.1.38-02 Irina Černâkova Pietrozawodsk, Russia Vodlozerie (North-West Russia): former social potential in the light of historical data and geographical landscape Introduction The Vodlozero region is an area of early peasant settlement in the Russian North. It is located to the northeast of the Lake Onego, surrounding the rather lar- ge Lake Vodlozero – one of the four largest water reservoirs in southern Karelia (Northwest Russia). The watershed between the two lakes forms a natural eastern border of the region. From the south and north its borders were defined by the settlement areas of the Russians, who identified themselves as “Vodlozery”, i.e. inhabitants of Vodlozerie and not any other historical or cultural province.1 Interestingly, the region’s remoteness from cultural and economic centers had more influence on its development in modern times than during Middle Ages. A sys- tem of Vodlozerie settlements within the borders of “boyarshchina” – feudal lands of Novgorod people – existed here and was well documented in the cadastral sources as early as in the middle of the 16th century, and furthermore it was preserved almost unchanged up until the 20th century. Since the 18th century the region has become more and more isolated. The reason for this isolation is believed to be the shift of the trade routes towards the new capital of Saint Petersburg as well as the almost complete absence of roads.2 Indeed, there were never built any asphalt roads leading to the Vodlozero region. The settlements were mostly located on the islands in Lake 1 Valentina Kuznecova, Boris Putilov, ed., Pamâtniki russkogo folʹklora Vodlozerʹâ: Predaniâ i bylički (Pertozavodsk 1997), 105–106, 107–110, 111.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Bohdan Khmelnytskyi and the Kozaks in the Rusin Struggle for Independence from the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth: 1648--1649
    University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor Electronic Theses and Dissertations Theses, Dissertations, and Major Papers 1-1-1967 The role of Bohdan Khmelnytskyi and the Kozaks in the Rusin struggle for independence from the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth: 1648--1649. Andrew B. Pernal University of Windsor Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd Recommended Citation Pernal, Andrew B., "The role of Bohdan Khmelnytskyi and the Kozaks in the Rusin struggle for independence from the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth: 1648--1649." (1967). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 6490. https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd/6490 This online database contains the full-text of PhD dissertations and Masters’ theses of University of Windsor students from 1954 forward. These documents are made available for personal study and research purposes only, in accordance with the Canadian Copyright Act and the Creative Commons license—CC BY-NC-ND (Attribution, Non-Commercial, No Derivative Works). Under this license, works must always be attributed to the copyright holder (original author), cannot be used for any commercial purposes, and may not be altered. Any other use would require the permission of the copyright holder. Students may inquire about withdrawing their dissertation and/or thesis from this database. For additional inquiries, please contact the repository administrator via email ([email protected]) or by telephone at 519-253-3000ext. 3208. THE ROLE OF BOHDAN KHMELNYTSKYI AND OF THE KOZAKS IN THE RUSIN STRUGGLE FOR INDEPENDENCE FROM THE POLISH-LI'THUANIAN COMMONWEALTH: 1648-1649 by A ‘n d r e w B. Pernal, B. A. A Thesis Submitted to the Department of History of the University of Windsor in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Faculty of Graduate Studies 1967 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • Artykuły I Rozprawy
    ARTYKUŁY I ROZPRAWY Przegląd Historyczno-Oświatowy 2019, nr 3–4 PL ISSN 0033-2178 RAMUNĖ ŠMIGELSKYTĖ-STUKIENĖ ORCID: 0000-0002-3361-4151 Vytautas Magnus University. Education Academy Lithuania DOI: 10.17460/PHO_2019.3_4.01 CHILD EDUCATION IN THE FAMILY OF MICHAŁ KLEOFAS OGIŃSKI (1765–1833) INTRODUCTION In the early modern period, domestic education or home schooling was a form of education equal to school-based education. However, the mid-seventeenth cen- tury Western European crisis of trust in the system of education maintained by the monasteries and convents fostered attitudes among the elites of societies in favour of private home education. Such attitudes were amplified by the Jansenist ideas, which promoted teaching pupils in small groups. Teaching in monastery schools was also opposed in the works by François Fénelon and John Locke (1632–1704), which supported systemically organized and individualized education of children at home (Jakubiak, 2017, p. 20–22; Jakubiak, Nawrot-Borowska, 2019, p. 79). Locke’s Some Thoughts Concerning Education (1692) followed by new mod­ ified editions in 1695, 1699 and 1705, changed the philosophy of child education. Locke, believing that a human soul or a manner of thinking, orientation in values and a drive for action come to the fore upon the impact from external impressions and experiences, asserted in his works that everything a human being is faced with during development has a determinant value. For that reason, only properly organized education creates conditions for the skills of an individual to rational­ ly use available freedoms and suitably adjust to physical, moral, intellectual and political conditions of the surrounding world.
    [Show full text]
  • ZRBG – Ghetto-Liste (Stand: 01.08.2014) Sofern Eine Beschäftigung I
    ZRBG – Ghetto-Liste (Stand: 01.08.2014) Sofern eine Beschäftigung i. S. d. ZRBG schon vor dem angegebenen Eröffnungszeitpunkt glaubhaft gemacht ist, kann für die folgenden Gebiete auf den Beginn der Ghettoisierung nach Verordnungslage abgestellt werden: - Generalgouvernement (ohne Galizien): 01.01.1940 - Galizien: 06.09.1941 - Bialystok: 02.08.1941 - Reichskommissariat Ostland (Weißrussland/Weißruthenien): 02.08.1941 - Reichskommissariat Ukraine (Wolhynien/Shitomir): 05.09.1941 Eine Vorlage an die Untergruppe ZRBG ist in diesen Fällen nicht erforderlich. Datum der Nr. Ort: Gebiet: Eröffnung: Liquidierung: Deportationen: Bemerkungen: Quelle: Ergänzung Abaujszanto, 5613 Ungarn, Encyclopedia of Jewish Life, Braham: Abaújszántó [Hun] 16.04.1944 13.07.1944 Kassa, Auschwitz 27.04.2010 (5010) Operationszone I Enciklopédiája (Szántó) Reichskommissariat Aboltsy [Bel] Ostland (1941-1944), (Oboltsy [Rus], 5614 Generalbezirk 14.08.1941 04.06.1942 Encyclopedia of Jewish Life, 2001 24.03.2009 Oboltzi [Yid], Weißruthenien, heute Obolce [Pol]) Gebiet Vitebsk Abony [Hun] (Abon, Ungarn, 5443 Nagyabony, 16.04.1944 13.07.1944 Encyclopedia of Jewish Life 2001 11.11.2009 Operationszone IV Szolnokabony) Ungarn, Szeged, 3500 Ada 16.04.1944 13.07.1944 Braham: Enciklopédiája 09.11.2009 Operationszone IV Auschwitz Generalgouvernement, 3501 Adamow Distrikt Lublin (1939- 01.01.1940 20.12.1942 Kossoy, Encyclopedia of Jewish Life 09.11.2009 1944) Reichskommissariat Aizpute 3502 Ostland (1941-1944), 02.08.1941 27.10.1941 USHMM 02.2008 09.11.2009 (Hosenpoth) Generalbezirk
    [Show full text]
  • Działalność Polityczno-Wojskowa Chorążego Koronnego I Wojewody Kijowskiego Andrzeja Potockiego W Latach 1667–1673*
    143 WSCHODNI ROCZNIK HUMANISTYCZNY TOM XVI (2019), No 2 s. 143-167 doi: 10.36121/zhundert.16.2019.2.143 Zbigniew Hundert (Zamek Królewski w Warszawie – Muzeum) ORCID 0000-0002-5088-2465 Działalność polityczno-wojskowa chorążego koronnego i wojewody kijowskiego Andrzeja Potockiego w latach 1667–1673* Streszczenie: Andrzej Potocki był najstarszym synem wojewody krakowskiego i hetmana wielkiego koronnego Stanisława „Rewery”. Związany był ze swoją rodzimą ziemią halicką, w której zaczynał karierę wojskową, jako rotmistrz jazdy w 1648 r., oraz karierę polityczną. Od 1646 r. był starosta sądowym w Haliczu, co wpływało na jego polityczną pozycję w regionie oraz nakładało na niego obowiązek zapewnienia pogranicznej ziemi halickiej bezpieczeństwa. W latach 1647–1668, jako poseł, aż 15 razy reprezentował swoją ziemię na sejmach walnych. W 1667 r. był już doświadczonym pułkownikiem wojsk koronnych. Posiadał kilka jednostek wojskowych w ramach koronnej armii zaciężnej oraz blisko tysiąc wojsk nadwornych na potrzeby obrony pogranicza. Po śmierci ojca w 1667 r. faktycznie stał się głową rodu Potockich. Związany był już wtedy politycznie z dworem Jana Kazimierza i z osobą marszałka wielkiego i hetmana polnego – a od 1668 r. wielkiego koronnego Jana Sobieskiego. W związku z tym jeszcze w 1665 r. otrzymał urząd chorążego koronnego. W 1667 r. bezskutecznie starał się też o buławę polną w przypadku awansu Sobieskiego na hetmaństwo wielkie. Potem brał udział w kampanii podhajeckiej, dowodząc grupą wojsk koronnych, swoich nadwornych i pospolitego ruszenia. W 1668 r. wszedł do senatu w randze wojewody kijowskiego, próbując oddziaływać na życie polityczne Kijowszczyzny i angażować się w sprawę odzyskania z rąk rosyjskich Kijowa. W okresie panowania Michała Korybuta (1669–1673) był jednym z najbardziej aktywnych liderów opozycji i jednym z najbliższych współpracowników politycznych i wojskowych Sobieskiego.
    [Show full text]
  • Strengthened Air Defence
    AUGUST 2020. NO 8 (27). NEWS FRENCH TROOPS IN LITHUANIA MARKED BASTILLE DAY NATO'S PRESENCE THE 7TH ROTATION: HANDLING AN UNEXPECTED CRISIS Strengthened air defence ON JULY 28 PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA GITANAS NAUSĖDA WAS ACCOMPANIED BY MINISTER OF NATIONAL DEFENCE RAIMUNDAS KAROBLIS, CHIEF OF THE DEFENCE STAFF OF THE LITHUANIAN ARMED FORCES MAJ GEN GINTAUTAS ZENKEVIČIUS AND COMMANDER OF THE LITHUANIAN AIR FORCE COL DAINIUS GUZAS ON A VISIT TO THE LITHUANIAN AIR FORCE BASE IN ŠIAULIAI TO FAMILIARISE WITH THE AIR DEFENCE CAPABILITIES LITHUANIA HAS AND TO MEET WITH THE SPANISH, BRITISH AND GERMAN AIRMEN CONDUCTING SPECIAL THE CURRENT ROTATION OF THE NATO AIR POLICING MISSION IN THE BALTIC STATES, AS WELL AS U.S. AND LITHUANIAN SOLDIERS. NAPOLEON‘S LITHUANIAN resident was shown the RBS70, tional Exercise Tobruq Legacy 2020 in Sep- FORCES. PART II Stinger, Grom missile air defence tember this autumn. systems operated by the Air Defence NASAMS is the most widely used mid- PBattalion, Sentinel and Giraffe surveillance range air defence system in NATO member radars, and elements of the NASAMS mid- states, and even for guarding the airspace over range air defence system delivered to Lithua- the White House, Washington. Lithuania has nia in June earlier this year. acquired the most recent, third generation, "Arrival of the NASAMS reinforces air NASAMS 3, its current users are still only defence of Lithuania and NATO’s eastern the Lithuanian Armed Forces and the Armed flank, all the components of the integrated Forces of Norway, the manufacturer. defence system are linked together, and The guests also viewed fighter aircraft the deterrence becomes stronger as a result," allies protect the Baltic airspace with: F18 Minister of National Defence R.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ukrainian Weekly 2012, No.27-28
    www.ukrweekly.com INSIDE: l Guilty verdict for killer of abusive police chief – page 3 l Ukrainian Journalists of North America meet – page 4 l A preview: Soyuzivka’s Ukrainian Cultural Festival – page 5 THEPublished U by theKRAINIAN Ukrainian National Association Inc., a fraternal W non-profit associationEEKLY Vol. LXXX No. 27-28 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, JULY 1-JULY 8, 2012 $1/$2 in Ukraine Ukraine at Euro 2012: Yushchenko announces plans for new political party Another near miss by Zenon Zawada Special to The Ukrainian Weekly and Sheva’s next move KYIV – Former Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko was known for repeatedly saying that he hates politics, cre- by Ihor N. Stelmach ating the impression that he was doing it for a higher cause in spite of its dirtier moments. SOUTH WINSOR, Conn. – Ukrainian soccer fans Yet even at his political nadir, Mr. Yushchenko still can’t got that sinking feeling all over again when the game seem to tear away from what he hates so much. At a June 26 officials ruled Marko Devic’s shot against England did not cross the goal line. The goal would have press conference, he announced that he is launching a new evened their final Euro 2012 Group D match at 1-1 political party to compete in the October 28 parliamentary and possibly inspired a comeback win for the co- elections, defying polls that indicate it has no chance to qualify. hosts, resulting in a quarterfinal match versus Italy. “One thing burns my soul – looking at the political mosa- After all, it had happened before, when Andriy ic, it may happen that a Ukrainian national democratic party Shevchenko’s double header brought Ukraine back won’t emerge in Ukrainian politics for the first time in 20 from the seemingly dead to grab a come-from- years.
    [Show full text]
  • On Old Macewas, Synagogues and Klezmorim∗
    M u z y k a l i a VII · Judaica 2 “There on the willows we hung our”…violins: On Old Macewas, Synagogues and Klezmorim∗ B e n j a m i n V o g e l The fragment of the popular Psalm 137 quoted in the title of this essay signals a new path of inquiry investigating musical instruments as symbols in Judaism, more specifically as decorations of tombstones and synagogues in historically Polish lands and as an iconographic resource for research into the history of musical instruments. During the last few centuries, musical instruments appeared very rarely on Jewish tombstones in Central Europe. Starting with the 18th century they were painted more often on walls inside synagogues as illustrations to Psalms 137 and 150. Most of those temples were made of wood and some of stone, but no wooden synagogue and only a dozen or so stone ones survived World War II. However, some archival photographs and paintings still bear witness to better days. Two important questions remains: how accurately do those iconographical sources reflect the instrumentarium used in biblical and later times and how closely do they reflect the instrumentarium used by Jewish (and other) musicians, especially klezmorim at time the images where created? In this essay I will consider mainly the period from the 18th century up to the present, focusing on all the central and eastern historically Polish territories, excluding Silesia and Pomerania where Jewish culture had a different, more assimilated character than in central lands. One must remember that until the 18th century the Polish Kingdom (since the 16th century the Polish Lithuanian Commonwealth) included the lands of Lithuania, Belarus and Ukraine.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Charitable Activity in the Formation of Vilnius Society in the 14Th to Mid-16Th Centuries S.C
    LITHUANIAN historical STUDIES 17 2012 ISSN 1392-2343 PP. 39–69 THE ROLE OF CHARITABLE ACTIVITY IN THE FORMATION OF VILNIUS SOCIETY IN THE 14TH TO MID-16TH CENTURIES S.C. Rowell ABSTRACT This article examines the development of charitable activity in the city of Vilnius and elsewhere in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania before the middle of the sixteenth century by studying the foundation of almshouses to care for the poor and destitute and foster the memory and salvation of pious benefactors. Almshouse foundations developed from increasing forms of practical piety within the GDL from the late fifteenth century, following earlier west European and Polish models. The first, dedicated to traditional patrons of such institutions, St Job and St Mary Magdalene, was founded by a Vilnius canon and medical doctor, Martin of Duszniki with the support of the monarch, Sigismund the Old, and his counsellors between 1518 and 1522. The almshouse swiftly became an established part of the city’s sacral topography. The fashion was adopted by Eastern Orthodox parishes in Vilnius too, and later spread to other confessional groups. Twelve charters are published for the first time in an appendix. Christian charity in public spaces flourished throughout Catholic Europe during the 13th to 15th centuries 1. Indeed, the first chari- table intitutions for the poor are known in England from the tenth century. It behoved the bishop elect on taking his oath of office to protect the poor and the sick 2. Providing lodging and food for the deserving poor over time became the function of almshouses, hospitalia.
    [Show full text]