Population Dynamics of Pests Infesting Castor and Their Natural Enemies In
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
To Us Insectometers, It Is Clear That Insect Decline in Our Costa Rican
SPECIAL FEATURE: PERSPECTIVE To us insectometers, it is clear that insect decline in our Costa Rican tropics is real, so let’sbekindto SPECIAL FEATURE: PERSPECTIVE the survivors Daniel H. Janzena,1 and Winnie Hallwachsa Edited by David L. Wagner, University of Connecticut, and accepted by Editorial Board Member May R. Berenbaum November 11, 2020 (received for review April 6, 2020) We have been field observers of tropical insects on four continents and, since 1978, intense observers of caterpillars, their parasites, and their associates in the 1,260 km2 of dry, cloud, and rain forests of Area´ de Conservaci ´onGuanacaste (ACG) in northwestern Costa Rica. ACG’s natural ecosystem restoration began with its national park designation in 1971. As human biomonitors, or “insectometers,” we see that ACG’s insect species richness and density have gradually declined since the late 1970s, and more intensely since about 2005. The overarching perturbation is climate change. It has caused increasing ambient tempera- tures for all ecosystems; more erratic seasonal cues; reduced, erratic, and asynchronous rainfall; heated air masses sliding up the volcanoes and burning off the cloud forest; and dwindling biodiversity in all ACG terrestrial ecosystems. What then is the next step as climate change descends on ACG’s many small-scale successes in sustainable biodevelopment? Be kind to the survivors by stimulating and facilitating their owner societies to value them as legitimate members of a green sustainable nation. Encourage national bioliteracy, BioAlfa. climate change | BioAlfa | conservation by rewilding | biodevelopment | insect decline As “insectometers,” also known as human biomoni- eventually focused into Area´ de Conservaci ´onGuana- tors, we have watched the conspicuous ongoing de- caste (ACG) in northwestern Costa Rica (8–13) (Fig. -
Natural Distribution of Parasitoids of Larvae of the Fall Armyworm, <I
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications: Department of Entomology Entomology, Department of 2009 Natural distribution of parasitoids of larvae of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda, in Argentina M Gabriela Murua Estación Experimental Agroindustrial Obispo Colombres, CONICET Jamie Molina Ochoa Universidad de Colima, University of Nebraska-Lincoln Patricio Fidalgo CRILAR Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologyfacpub Part of the Entomology Commons Murua, M Gabriela; Ochoa, Jamie Molina; and Fidalgo, Patricio, "Natural distribution of parasitoids of larvae of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda, in Argentina" (2009). Faculty Publications: Department of Entomology. 384. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologyfacpub/384 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Entomology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications: Department of Entomology by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Journal of Insect Science: Vol. 9 | Article 20 Murúa et al. Natural distribution of parasitoids of larvae of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda, in Argentina M. Gabriela Murúaa,b, Jaime Molina-Ochoac,d and Patricio Fidalgoe aEstación Experimental Agroindustrial Obispo Colombres, Sección Zoología Agrícola, CC 9, Las Talitas (T4101XAC), Tucumán, Argentina bCONICET cUniversidad de Colima, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Km. 40, autopista Colima-Manzanillo, Tecomán, Colima (28100), México dDepartment of Entomology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583-0816, USA eCRILAR (CONICET), entre Ríos y Mendoza s/n, Anillaco (5301), La Rioja, Argentina Abstract To develop a better understanding of the natural distribution of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), and to update the knowledge of the incidence of its complex of parasitoids. -
Forestry Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Forestry Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Forest Health & Biosecurity Working Papers OVERVIEW OF FOREST PESTS INDONESIA January 2007 Forest Resources Development Service Working Paper FBS/19E Forest Management Division FAO, Rome, Italy Forestry Department Overview of forest pests - Indonesia DISCLAIMER The aim of this document is to give an overview of the forest pest1 situation in Indonesia. It is not intended to be a comprehensive review. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. © FAO 2007 1 Pest: Any species, strain or biotype of plant, animal or pathogenic agent injurious to plants or plant products (FAO, 2004). ii Overview of forest pests - Indonesia TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction..................................................................................................................... 1 Forest pests...................................................................................................................... 1 Naturally regenerating forests..................................................................................... 1 Insects ..................................................................................................................... 1 Diseases.................................................................................................................. -
Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae: Ophioninae) Newly Recorded from Japan
Japanese Journal of Systematic Entomology, 22 (2): 203–207. November 30, 2016. Three Oriental Species of the Genus Enicospilus Stephens (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae: Ophioninae) Newly Recorded from Japan So SHIMIZU 1), 2) and Kaoru MAETO 1) 1) Laboratory of Insect Biodiversity and Ecosystem Science, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Kobe University, Rokkodaicho 1–1, Nada, Kobe, Hyogo 657–8501, Japan. 2) Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract Three species of the ophionine genus Enicospilus Stephens, 1835 collected in the Ryukyu Islands, E. abdominalis (Szépligeti, 1906), E. nigronotatus Cameron, 1903, and E. xanthocephalus Cameron, 1905, were newly recorded from Japan. E. abdominalis and E. xanthocephalus are widely distributed in the Oriental region and its neighbouring areas, however E. nigronota- tus is endemic to the Oriental region. Most of the specimens were collected in light traps, and thus the species are presumed to be nocturnal. Introduction (SMZ1500, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) was used for morphological observation. Multi-focus photographs for figure 1 were taken The genus Enicospilus Stephens, belonging to the tribe using a single-lens reflex camera (D90, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) Enicospilini Townes of the ichneumonid subfamily Ophioninae and were stacked by using Zeren Stacker. Figure 2 was taken Shuckard (Townes, 1971; Rousse et al., 2016), comprises over using a digital microscope (VHX-600, Keyence, Osaka, 700 species that are distributed in all biogeographical regions Japan). All figures were edited by Adobe Photoshop© CS5. except for the Arctic (e.g., Yu et al., 2012; Broad & Shaw, 2016). The morphological terminology mainly follows Gauld It is the solitary koinobiont endoparasitoid of middle- to large- (1991) and Gauld & Mitchell (1981). -
Crop and Stored Grain Pest and Their Management. (ENTO-4311)
Lec. 1(p.1 – 2): Introduction of Economic Entomology and Economic Classification of Insect Pests Lec. 2-5 (p.3- 15) Rice: Yellow stem borer, gallmidge, brown planthopper, green leafhopper, hispa, leaf folder, ear head bug, grasshoppers, root weevil, swarming caterpillar, climbing cutworm, case worm, whorl maggot, leaf mite, panicle mite, IPM practices in rice. Lec. 6-8 (p.16- 25) Sorghum and other millets: Sorghum shoot fly, stem borer, pink borer, sorghum midge, ear head bug, red hairy caterpillar, deccan wingless grasshopper, aphids, maize shoot bug, flea beetle, blister beetles, ragi cutworm, ragi root aphid, army worm. Wheat: Ghujia weevil, ragi pink borer, termites. Lec. 9-11 (p. 26- 33) Sugarcane: Early shoot borer, internodal borer, top shoot borer, scales, leafhoppers, white grub, mealy bugs, termites, whiteflies, woolly aphid, yellow mite. Lec 12- 14 (p.34- 47) Cotton: Spotted bollworm, american bollworm, pink bollworm, tobacco caterpillar, leafhopper, whiteflies, aphid, mites , thrips, red cotton bug, dusky cotton bug, leaf roller, stem weevil, grasshoppers, mealybug, IPM in cotton. Lec. 15 (p.48 - 51) Jute: jute semilooper, jute stem weevil, jute stem girdler, Bihar hairy caterpillar Mesta: Hairy caterpillars, stem weevil, mealy bugs, leafhopper, aphid. Sunhemp: Hairy caterpillars, stem borer, flea beetle. Lec. 16-17 (p.52- 59) Pulses: Gram caterpillar, plume moth, pod fly, stem fly, spotted pod borer, cowpea aphid, cow bug, pod bug, leafhopper, stink bug, green pod boring caterpillar, blue butterflies, redgram mite. Pea: pea leaf miner and pea stem fly Soyabean: Stem fly, ragi cutworm, leaf miner, whitefly. Lec. 18 (p.60- 63) Castor: Semilooper, shoot and capsule borer, tobacco caterpillar, leafhopper, butterfly, whitefly, thrips, castor slug, mite. -
Insects and Related Arthropods Associated with of Agriculture
USDA United States Department Insects and Related Arthropods Associated with of Agriculture Forest Service Greenleaf Manzanita in Montane Chaparral Pacific Southwest Communities of Northeastern California Research Station General Technical Report Michael A. Valenti George T. Ferrell Alan A. Berryman PSW-GTR- 167 Publisher: Pacific Southwest Research Station Albany, California Forest Service Mailing address: U.S. Department of Agriculture PO Box 245, Berkeley CA 9470 1 -0245 Abstract Valenti, Michael A.; Ferrell, George T.; Berryman, Alan A. 1997. Insects and related arthropods associated with greenleaf manzanita in montane chaparral communities of northeastern California. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-167. Albany, CA: Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Service, U.S. Dept. Agriculture; 26 p. September 1997 Specimens representing 19 orders and 169 arthropod families (mostly insects) were collected from greenleaf manzanita brushfields in northeastern California and identified to species whenever possible. More than500 taxa below the family level wereinventoried, and each listing includes relative frequency of encounter, life stages collected, and dominant role in the greenleaf manzanita community. Specific host relationships are included for some predators and parasitoids. Herbivores, predators, and parasitoids comprised the majority (80 percent) of identified insects and related taxa. Retrieval Terms: Arctostaphylos patula, arthropods, California, insects, manzanita The Authors Michael A. Valenti is Forest Health Specialist, Delaware Department of Agriculture, 2320 S. DuPont Hwy, Dover, DE 19901-5515. George T. Ferrell is a retired Research Entomologist, Pacific Southwest Research Station, 2400 Washington Ave., Redding, CA 96001. Alan A. Berryman is Professor of Entomology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-6382. All photographs were taken by Michael A. Valenti, except for Figure 2, which was taken by Amy H. -
Reproductive Biology and Longevity of Euplectrus Ronnai (Brèthes) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae)
July - September 2003 481 BIOLOGICAL CONTROL Reproductive Biology and Longevity of Euplectrus ronnai (Brèthes) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) ANA C. YAMAMOTO AND LUÍS A. FOERSTER Depto. Zoologia, UFPR. C. postal 19.020, 81531-990, Curitiba, PR, e-mail: [email protected] Neotropical Entomology 32(3):481-485 (2003) Biologia Reprodutiva e Longevidade de Euplectrus ronnai (Brèthes) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) RESUMO - O ectoparasitóide Euplectrus ronnai (Brèthes) é um dos componentes do complexo de espécies que parasitam a lagarta do trigo Mythimna (Pseudaletia) sequax Franclemont (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Não há dados na literatura sobre o potencial de parasitismo, preferência por ínstares do hospedeiro e longevidade desse parasitóide, o que motivou a realização do presente trabalho. O parasitismo ocorreu entre o terceiro e o quinto ínstares do hospedeiro; lagartas de segundo instar inviabilizaram o desenvolvimento do parasitóide, e no primeiro e no sexto ínstares não houve oviposição pelas fêmeas de E. ronnai. O número de ovos depositados pelas fêmeas aumentou com o estádio de desenvolvimento do hospedeiro, variando de 1,5 ovos/lagarta no terceiro instar a 3,6 ovos/lagarta no quinto ínstar. A proporção de lagartas parasitadas entre os diferentes ínstares mostrou que E. ronnai apresenta preferência pelo quarto e quinto ínstares de M. sequax. Não houve diferença no tempo de desenvolvimento, na razão sexual, no número médio de lagartas parasitadas e na porcentagem de lagartas parasitadas em testes de livre escolha entre lagartas de quarto e de quinto ínstares. Entretanto, o número de parasitóides/hospedeiro foi significativamente maior em lagartas de quinto ínstar. A fecundidade média das fêmeas de E. ronnai foi de 63,7 ovos e cada fêmea parasitou a média de 20,3 lagartas. -
Diversity of Harmful and Beneficial Insect Fauna in Pigeonpea [Cajanus Cajan (L.)] Ecosystem in Tamil Nadu, India
Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2018) 7(8): 396-402 International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences ISSN: 2319-7706 Volume 7 Number 08 (2018) Journal homepage: http://www.ijcmas.com Original Research Article https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.708.045 Diversity of Harmful and Beneficial Insect Fauna in Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.)] Ecosystem in Tamil Nadu, India J. Alfred Daniel*, N. Chitra and M. Mathialagan Department of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore-3, Tamil Nadu, India *Corresponding author ABSTRACT The study of biodiversity associated with agro ecosystem is of significance for agro K e yw or ds ecologist and conservation biologist, since the maintenance of biological diversity is essential for productive and ecologically sustainable agriculture. Field experiment was Pigeonpea conducted to inventorize the insect fauna in pigeon pea ecosystem from February 2015 to [Cajanus cajan (L.)], July 2015. A total of 77 different species of insects belonging to 45 families under 10 Ecosystem, Diversity orders were collected. Of the 77 species recorded, 53 species were harmful and 24 were beneficial. The Simpson’s index of Diversity was the highest for beneficial insects (0.94) Article Info and for harmful insects it was (0.93). Similar trend was observed in Shannon-Wiener index Accepted: also for beneficial and harmful insects with values of 3.12 and 3.00, respectively. The 04 July 2018 values of Margalef index for the beneficial and harmful insects revealed that maximum Available Online: richness (6.35) was accounted for harmful insects followed by beneficial insects (5.32). 10 August 2018 The species evenness was maximum for beneficial insects (0.55), whereas for the harmful insects it was (0.45). -
PACIFIC INSECTS MONOGRAPH Ll
PACIFIC INSECTS MONOGRAPH ll Lepidoptera of American Samoa with particular reference to biology and ecology By John Adams Comstock Published by Entomology Department, Bernice P. Bishop Museum Honolulu, Hawaii, U. S. A. 1966 PACIFIC INSECTS MONOGRAPHS Published by Entomology Department, Bernice P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu, Hawaii, 96819, U. S. A. Editorial Committee: J. L. Gressitt, Editor (Honolulu), S. Asahina (Tokyo), R. G. Fennah (London), R. A. Harrison (Christchurch), T. C. Maa (Honolulu & Taipei), C. W. Sabrosky (Washington, D. C), R. L. Usinger (Berkeley), J. van der Vecht (Leiden), K. Yasumatsu (Fukuoka), E. C. Zimmerman (New Hampshire). Assistant Editors: P. D. Ashlock (Honolulu), Carol Higa (Honolulu), Naoko Kunimori (Fukuoka), Setsuko Nakata (Honolulu), Toshi Takata (Fukuoka). Business Manager: C. M. Yoshimoto (Honolulu). Business Assistant: Doris Anbe (Honolulu). Business Agent in Japan: K. Yasumatsu (Fukuoka). Entomological staff, Bishop Museum, 1966: Doris Anbe, Hatsuko Arakaki, P. D. Ashlock, S. Azuma, Madaline Boyes, Candida Cardenas, Ann Cutting, M. L. Goff, J. L. Gressitt (Chairman), J. Harrell, Carol Higa, Y. Hirashima, Shirley Hokama, E. Holzapfel, Dorothy Hoxie, Helen Hurd, June Ibara, Naoko Kuni mori, T. C. Maa, Grace Nakahashi, Setsuko Nakata (Adm. Asst.), Tulene Nonomura, Carol Okuma, Ka tharine Pigue, Linda Reineccius, T. Saigusa, I. Sakakibara, Judy Sakamoto, G. A. Samuelson, Sybil Seto, W. A. Steffan, Amy Suehiro, Grace Thompson, Clara Uchida, J. R. Vockeroth, Nixon Wilson, Mabel Ya- tsuoka, C. M. Yoshimoto, E. C. Zimmermann. Field associates: M. J. Fitzsimons, E. E. Gless, G. E. Lip- pert, V. Peckham, D. S. Rabor, J. Sedlacek, M. Sedlacek, P. Shanahan, R. Straatman, J. Strong, H. M. Tor- revillas, A. -
Erebidae-Erebinae.Pdf
Erebidae Erebinae Achaea janata (Linnaeus, 1758) Taxonomy: Phalaena janata Linnaeus, 1758; 527.– . Phalaena melicerta Drury, [1773]:46,. – India (Bombay). Noctua tigrina Fabricius, 1775. Noctua cyathina Macleay, 1826 . Catocala traversii Fereday, 1877. Ophiusa ekeikei Bethune-Baker, 1906. melicertoides Strand, 1914: 74. Imago melicertella Strand, 1914: 74. Achaea melicertoides Gaede, 1938. Achaea melicertella Gaede, 1938. Hostplant: Flight period: viii. Altitude: 460 m. Distribution map Erebidae Erebinae Achaea serva (Fabricius, 1775) Taxonomy: Noctua serva Fabricius, 1775. Achaea fasciculipes Walker, 1858. fuscosuffusa Strand, 1914: 73. Achaea fuscosuffusa Gaede, 1938. Hostplant: Flight period: ix. Altitude: 2900 m. Imago Distribution map Erebidae Erebinae Agonista hypoleuca Guenee, 1852 Taxonomy Hostplant Flight period Altitude Imago Male genitalia Distribution map Female genitalia Erebidae Erebinae Arcte polygrapha Kollar, 1844 Taxonomy: Arcte polygrapha Kollar, 1844± ./ In- dia (Himalaya) Hostplant Flight period: v, viii. Altitude: 460-1975 m. Imago Distribution map Erebidae Erebinae Artena dotata (Fabricius, 1794) Taxonomy: Noctua dotata Fabricius, 1794: 55.– E. India. Hostplant: Flight period: v-vi. Altitude: 1580-2020 m. Imago Distribution map Erebidae Erebinae Blepharidia griseirufa Hampson, 1894 Taxonomy Hostplant Flight period Altitude Imago Male genitalia Distribution map Female genitalia Erebidae Erebinae Capnodes caustiplaga Hampson, 1895 Taxonomy Hostplant Flight period Altitude Imago Male genitalia Distribution map Female genitalia Erebidae Erebinae Capnodes pustulifera Walker, 1864 Taxonomy Hostplant Flight period Altitude Imago Male genitalia Distribution map Female genitalia Erebidae Erebinae Catocala nupta (Linnaeus, 1767) Taxonomy: Phalaena nupta Linnaeus, 1767: 841.– Germany. Catocala unicuba Walker, [1858]:1210.– India. Hostplant: Populus, P. nigra, Salix, S. fragilis Flight period: ix. Altitude: 2900 m. Imago Distribution map Erebidae Erebinae Chrysopera combinans (Walker, 1858) Taxonomy: Achaea combinans Walker, 1858: 1399.- Ceylon. -
REPORT on APPLES – Fruit Pathway and Alert List
EU project number 613678 Strategies to develop effective, innovative and practical approaches to protect major European fruit crops from pests and pathogens Work package 1. Pathways of introduction of fruit pests and pathogens Deliverable 1.3. PART 5 - REPORT on APPLES – Fruit pathway and Alert List Partners involved: EPPO (Grousset F, Petter F, Suffert M) and JKI (Steffen K, Wilstermann A, Schrader G). This document should be cited as ‘Wistermann A, Steffen K, Grousset F, Petter F, Schrader G, Suffert M (2016) DROPSA Deliverable 1.3 Report for Apples – Fruit pathway and Alert List’. An Excel file containing supporting information is available at https://upload.eppo.int/download/107o25ccc1b2c DROPSA is funded by the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration (grant agreement no. 613678). www.dropsaproject.eu [email protected] DROPSA DELIVERABLE REPORT on Apples – Fruit pathway and Alert List 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Background on apple .................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Data on production and trade of apple fruit ................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Pathway ‘apple fruit’ ..................................................................................................................................... -
Biology of Achaea Janata Linneaus on Castor and Rose N.K.S
Agric. Sci. Digest, 22 (3) : 213 - 214,2002 BIOLOGY OF ACHAEA JANATA LINNEAUS ON CASTOR AND ROSE N.K.S. Bhadauria, U.C. Singh and U.S. Dwivedi Department of Entomology, College of Agriculture, JNKW Campus, Gwalior - 474 002, India ABSTRACT Biology ofAchaeajanata Linneaus was studied on the two principal hosts viz., castor and rose to find suitable host for development of this insect under laboratory conditions. Castor was found more suitable host than rose on the basis of more number of eggs, shorter larval and pupal period with lower larval and pupal mortality and higher per cent adult emergence. The castor semilooper, Achaeajanata with filter paper. The adults emerging on the (Lepidoptera: Noctuidati} is a serious pest of same day (Male, female) were paired and castor in many castor growing states of India. released for egg laying in oviposition cages (45 Besides castor, it feeds on different host plants x 45 x 45 cm). Honey sulution (5%) was like pomegranate, rose, dudhi etc. Food plants provided as foot to adults. Observations on play a vital role in the development, survival various developmental stages Le. eggs to adults and reproductive potential of insects (Painter, were recorded on both the hosts. Experiment 1951). The present contribution deals with was performed in four sets. the stYEIies on the biology of the pest on castor The number of eggs laid on castor was and rose. more (535.3 ± 26.8 egs/female) than rose The biology of castor semi looper was :(250.4 ± 12.5/female) (Table 1). Gaikwad studied in the laboratory.