HSP90 Regulates DNA Repair Via the Interaction Between XRCC1 and DNA Polymerase &Beta
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ARTICLE Received 30 Oct 2013 | Accepted 7 Oct 2014 | Published 26 Nov 2014 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6513 HSP90 regulates DNA repair via the interaction between XRCC1 and DNA polymerase b Qingming Fang1,2,w, Burcu Inanc3, Sandy Schamus2, Xiao-hong Wang2, Leizhen Wei2,4, Ashley R. Brown2, David Svilar1,2, Kelsey F. Sugrue2,w, Eva M. Goellner1,2,w, Xuemei Zeng5, Nathan A. Yates2,5,6, Li Lan2,4, Conchita Vens3,7 & Robert W. Sobol1,2,8,w Cellular DNA repair processes are crucial to maintain genome stability and integrity. In DNA base excision repair, a tight heterodimer complex formed by DNA polymerase b (Polb) and XRCC1 is thought to facilitate repair by recruiting Polb to DNA damage sites. Here we show that disruption of the complex does not impact DNA damage response or DNA repair. Instead, the heterodimer formation is required to prevent ubiquitylation and degradation of Polb. In contrast, the stability of the XRCC1 monomer is protected from CHIP-mediated ubiquitylation by interaction with the binding partner HSP90. In response to cellular pro- liferation and DNA damage, proteasome and HSP90-mediated regulation of Polb and XRCC1 alters the DNA repair complex architecture. We propose that protein stability, mediated by DNA repair protein complex formation, functions as a regulatory mechanism for DNA repair pathway choice in the context of cell cycle progression and genome surveillance. 1 Department of Pharmacology & Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA. 2 Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA. 3 The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Division of Biological Stress Response, Amsterdam 1006BE, The Netherlands. 4 Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA. 5 Biomedical Mass Spectrometry Center, University of Pittsburgh Schools of the Health Sciences, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA. 6 Department of Cell Biology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261, USA. 7 The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Division of Radiotherapy, Amsterdam 1006BE, The Netherlands. 8 Department of Human Genetics, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA. w Present Addresses: University of South Alabama Mitchell Cancer Institute, 1660 Springhill Avenue, Mobile, Alabama 36604, USA (Q.F., R.W.S.); Institute for Biomedical Sciences, The George Washington University, Ross Hall, 2300 Eye Street NW, Washington DC 20037, USA (K.F.S.); Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of California School of Medicine, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 92093-0669, USA (E.M.G.). Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to R.W.S. (email: [email protected]). NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 5:5513 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6513 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications 1 & 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved. ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6513 enome stability requires efficient DNA repair and DNA recruitment function, here we report that the primary role for the damage response protein complexes. Base excision repair scaffold protein XRCC1, together with HSP90, is to govern G(BER) is essential to provide nuclear and mitochondrial stability of its protein complex partners. genome stability by repairing greater than 20,000 spontaneous 1 base lesions per cell per day . As with gross genomic changes such Results as DNA double-strand breaks, DNA base damage can also lead to Polb V303 loop is essential for the interaction with XRCC1. genome instability and elevated cancer incidence if left DNA polymerase b (Polb) and XRCC1 form a BER sub-complex unrepaired2. Base damage is repaired by proteins of the BER via the C-terminal domain of Polb and the N-terminal domain of machinery via numerous sub-pathways that vary depending on XRCC1. A prominent feature of the interface is the Polb V303 the lesion type and the size of the repair patch3–5. Upon damage, loop, comprised of amino-acid residues P300 to E309 and a poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase 1 (PARP1) activation triggers BER hydrophobic pocket on XRCC1, spanning amino-acid residues protein recruitment to facilitate short-patch or long-patch BER F67 to V86, but may also include both b-strands D and E of b b b via DNA polymerase (Pol )-dependent or Pol -independent XRCC1 (refs 13,14). Guided by the crystal structure of the rat- mechanisms3,4,6,7. Polb(C-term)/human-XRCC1(N-term) complex9, we identified An essential component of BER and other DNA repair several potential residues in the human-Polb/human-XRCC1 complexes is the scaffold protein XRCC1 (ref. 8). Interestingly, interface region critical for complex formation. We mutated XRCC1 has no enzymatic activity and it is thought that its sole amino-acid residues in the Polb V303 loop (L301, V303 and function is to promote DNA repair protein recruitment to the site V306) to define the specific residues essential for Polb/XRCC1 of DNA damage. XRCC1 complexes with numerous BER proteins complex formation (Fig. 1a). To determine whether these V303 including DNA ligase III, Polb, aprataxin and PARP1, among 3 loop mutants of Polb disrupt the Polb/XRCC1 heterodimeric others . In response to PARP1 activation, XRCC1 recruitment is complex, stable LN428 cell lines were developed by lentiviral- thought to promote the formation of secondary BER protein mediated transduction to express Polb (Flag-Polb(WT)) or the complexes via interaction with these downstream factors to V303 loop mutants, with modifications in amino-acid residues complete repair4. A paradigm repair protein complex is L301, V303 and/or V306. The relative expression level of Polb b represented by the heterodimer of Pol and XRCC1 (ref. 9). and the V303 loop mutants in LN428 cells was examined and The two proteins (Polb and XRCC1) form a tight-binding shown (see Supplementary Fig. 1B and below). The targeted b complex suggested to facilitate recruitment of Pol to the site of amino-acid residues are depicted by the highlighted spheres in repair following PARP1 activation10. However, mouse models for the structure shown (Fig. 1a). The presence of the Polb/XRCC1 b XRCC1 and Pol have drastically different phenotypes, complex in these cells was probed by immunoprecipitation (IP) of pointing to independent yet crucial roles for both partners of the lentiviral-expressed Flag-Polb transgene via the N-terminal b 11 the complex. Mice lacking Pol die just after birth , whereas Flag epitope tag and probing for XRCC1 by immunoblot XRCC1 knockout (KO) mice do not develop beyond an early (Fig. 1b). Mutating residues L301 or V306 individually or stage of embryogenesis, embryonic day 6.5 (ref. 12). This early together had only a minimal impact, whereas mutating residue developmental failure and lethality underlines the crucial role for 303 (V303R) reduced the Polb/XRCC1 complex formation by BER in embryogenesis, development and genome stability. 90%. Altering both the L301 and V303 residues (L301R/V303R) Importantly, whereas both proteins may play a significant role resulted in a 99% loss (Fig. 1b; Supplementary Fig. S1A). Finally, together as a complex, these mouse models suggest that Polb and altering all three residues identified by the crystal structure XRCC1 may have separate roles in mammalian development and analysis (Fig. 1a; Polb(L301R/V303R/V306R), referred to herein cellular function. as Flag-Polb(TM)) completely abolished the interaction between This study was initiated to reveal the function and significance Polb and XRCC1 as determined by IP of either Polb or XRCC1 of conserved DNA repair protein interactions exemplified by the (Fig. 1b,c; Supplementary Fig. 1A). Analysis of the IP complexes b Pol /XRCC1 heterodimer. Guided by the structure of the by mass spectrometry also confirms the loss of XRCC1 binding to heterodimer comprised of the carboxy-terminal domain of rat- Flag-Polb(TM) (Supplementary Fig. 8). Note the equivalent b Pol (residues 142–335) and the amino-terminal domain of amount of Polb proteins in the immunoprecipitation clearly human XRCC1 (residues 1–151)9, we developed separation-of- demonstrates the loss of binding between Flag-Polb(TM) and b function mutants of Pol that retain the polymerase activity but XRCC1. These data establish that the Polb V303 loop, in are unable to form a heterodimer with XRCC1. Surprisingly, we particular the V303 residue, forms an essential complex- b find that the interaction between Pol and XRCC1 is not required formation interface with XRCC1. for the in vivo function of Polb. However, our study has revealed the primary function of this evolutionarily conserved interaction interface is to maintain protein stability of each monomer: Polb Polb/XRCC1 complex is not essential for DNA damage response. and XRCC1. Once released from XRCC1, we find that free Polb is The interaction of XRCC1 with Polb has been thought to be ubiquitylated on two lysines in the C-terminal domain and essential to complete repair. As a consequence, sensitivity to degraded by the proteasome independent of the E3 ligases CHIP oxidative stress or alkylation damage is determined by BER effi- or MULE. Conversely, XRCC1, not bound to Polb, forms a ciency3 such as that defined by XRCC1 or Polb proficiency. Since complex with HSP90 that stabilizes XRCC1 protein levels. Flag-Polb(TM) is completely devoid of the ability to interact with Knockdown or inactivation of HSP90 initiates ubiquitylation XRCC1, we used these constructs to determine whether the and degradation of XRCC1, mediated by CHIP. We provide interaction of Polb and XRCC1 is essential for the response to evidence that the dynamic interaction of Polb, XRCC1 and DNA damage in human cells. We used cells expressing Flag- HSP90, via the two heterodimers Polb/XRCC1 and XRCC1/ Polb(K72A), which inactivates the 50dRP lyase activity of Polb,or HSP90, is regulated by the cell cycle and in response to DNA cells expressing EGFP as control cells15.