An Agent-Based Model to Study Competitive Construction Bidding and the Winner's Curse

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Agent-Based Model to Study Competitive Construction Bidding and the Winner's Curse Missouri University of Science and Technology Scholars' Mine Engineering Management and Systems Engineering Management and Systems Engineering Faculty Research & Creative Works Engineering 13 May 2020 An Agent-Based Model to Study Competitive Construction Bidding and the Winner's Curse Amr Elsayegh Cihan H. Dagli Missouri University of Science and Technology, [email protected] Islam H. El-Adaway Missouri University of Science and Technology, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/engman_syseng_facwork Part of the Civil Engineering Commons, and the Operations Research, Systems Engineering and Industrial Engineering Commons Recommended Citation A. Elsayegh et al., "An Agent-Based Model to Study Competitive Construction Bidding and the Winner's Curse," Procedia Computer Science, vol. 168, pp. 147-153, Elsevier B.V., May 2020. The definitive version is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.02.278 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. This Article - Conference proceedings is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars' Mine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Engineering Management and Systems Engineering Faculty Research & Creative Works by an authorized administrator of Scholars' Mine. This work is protected by U. S. Copyright Law. Unauthorized use including reproduction for redistribution requires the permission of the copyright holder. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Available onlineScienceDirect at www.sciencedirect.com Procedia Computer Science 00 (2019) 000–000 Procedia Computer Science 00 (2019) 000–000 www.elsevier.com/locate/procedia ScienceDirect www.elsevier.com/locate/procedia Procedia Computer Science 168 (2020) 147–153 Complex Adaptive Systems Conference with Theme: LeveragingComplex AI and Machine Adaptive Learning Systems for Conference Societal Challenges, with Theme: CAS 2019 Leveraging AI and Machine Learning for Societal Challenges, CAS 2019 An Agent-based Model to Study Competitive Construction Bidding and the Winner’s Curse a* a a Amr Elsayegha*, Cihan H. Daglia, Islam H. El-adawaya 0F Amr Elsayegh , Cihan H. Dagli , Islam H. El-adaway 0F aMissouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO, USA, 65401 aMissouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO, USA, 65401 Abstract Abstract Reverse auction theory is the basis for competitive construction bidding process. The lowest bid method is utilized for selecting contractors in publicReverse projects. auction The theory winning is the c ontractorbasis for havingcompetitive the lowest construction bid value bidding could be process. cursed Thewhen lowest the submitted bid method bid valueis utilized results for in selectingnegative profits.contractors This inis causedpublic projects.by many The factors winning such casontractor the contractor’s having the estimation lowest bid accuracy value could and markup.be cursed This when is theaddressed submitted in thisbid papervalue resultsby providing in negative a model profits. sim ulatingThis is thecaused construction by many competitivefactors such bidding as the contractor’s and the occurrence estimation of theaccuracy winner’s and curse. markup. To thisThis end, is addressed the authors in showthis paper the extent by providing to which a the model winner’s simulating curse affectsthe construction the status competitiveof contracting bidding companies. and the The occurrence objectives of are the to winner’s understand curse. the To characteristics this end, the ofauthors the competitive show the extent bidding to phasewhich in the construction winner’s curse and toaffects study the the status behavior of contracting of contractor companies.s subject The to competitiveobjectives are bidding to understand and the occurrencethe characteristics of the winner’sof the competitive curse. As bidding such, the phase authors in construction implemented and a twoto study-step themethodology behavior of that contractor incorporatess subject (1) developingto competitive a gene biddingral simulation and the occurrencemodel involving of the awinner’s population curse. of contractorsAs such, the and authors projects implemented using agent a- basedtwo-step modeling methodology for the that competitive incorporates bidding (1) developing process and a gene (2) ralanalyzing simulation the modelresults involvingof the simulation a population model. of contractorsThis model and should projects provide using a agentbetter- understandingbased modeling to forthe theconstructi competitiveon profession bidding as process in contractors, and (2) projectanalyzing owners the results and Departments of the simulation of Transportation model. This of modelhow decisions should parerovide made a inbetter this biddingunderstanding environment to the .constructi on profession as in contractors, project owners and Departments of Transportation of how decisions are made in this bidding environment. © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. © 20192020 The Authors. Published byby ElsevierElsevier B.V. B.V. This is an open access articlearticle underunder the the CC CC BY BY-NC-ND-NC-ND license license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-nc-nd/4.0/) ) PeerThis -isreview an open under access responsibility article under of the the CC scientific BY-NC -NDcommittee license (ofhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by the Complex Adaptive Systems Conference-nc-nd/4.0/ with) Theme: Leveraging AI and Peer-reviewPeer-review underunder responsibilityresponsibility of of the the scientific scientific committee committee of theof theComplex Complex Adaptive Adaptive Systems Systems Conference Conference with Theme:with Theme: Leveraging Leveraging AI and AIMachine and LearningMachine Learnifor Societalng for Challenges Societal Challenges Machine Learning for Societal Challenges Keywords: Construction bidding; Contracting; Winner’s curse; Agent-based modeling; Simulation. Keywords: Construction bidding; Contracting; Winner’s curse; Agent-based modeling; Simulation. 1. Introduction 1. Introduction Winning projects bids is the blood that gives life to contractors in the construction industry. Contractors bid on projects to ensure Winning projects bids is the blood that gives life to contractors in the construction industry. Contractors bid on projects to ensure that more cash flow keeps coming towards their companies. Most public projects are bid by choosing the lowest bidder which is that more cash flow keeps coming towards their companies. Most public projects are bid by choosing the lowest bidder which is * Corresponding author. Tel.: +1-573-466-1630. * CorrespondingE-mail address: author. [email protected] Tel.: +1-573-466- 1630. E-mail address: [email protected] 1877-0509 © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This1877 -is0509 an open © 2019 access The article Authors. under Published the CC BYby Elsevier-NC-ND B.V. license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) PeerThis- isreview an open under access responsibility article under of the scientificCC BY-NC committee-ND license of the (http://creative Complex Adaptivecommons.org/licenses/by Systems Conference-nc -withnd/4.0/ Theme:) Leveraging AI and Machine Learning for SocietalPeer-review Challenges under responsibility of the scientific committee of the Complex Adaptive Systems Conference with Theme: Leveraging AI and Machine Learning for Societal Challenges 1877-0509 © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) Peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the Complex Adaptive Systems Conference with Theme: Leveraging AI and Machine Learning for Societal Challenges 10.1016/j.procs.2020.02.278 10.1016/j.procs.2020.02.278 1877-0509 148 Amr Elsayegh et al. / Procedia Computer Science 168 (2020) 147–153 A. Elsayegh; CH Dagli; IH El-adaway / Procedia Computer Science 00 (2019) 000–000 commonly known as Reverse Auction theory. As the construction industry grows, the competition between contractors increases and becomes more complex [1]. Bidding for a project is a major decision that contractors make after receiving relevant information about such project [2]. The major challenge in competitive bidding is that the contractor needs to bid low enough to win the contract but still high enough to generate positive profits [3]. Contractors try to be as accurate as possible in their estimates and include a minimum acceptable markup to maximize their chances of winning a bid. The estimation accuracy is subjective and depends on multiple factors such as the estimation staff, their experience and previous knowledge of similar projects [4]. Determining the markup is a strategic decision made by the upper management in each company which depends upon many factors such as size of the company, size of the project and how desperate they are willing to win. Desperate or unexperienced contractors could end up submitting low bids to secure winning a certain project. This could also be another strategy implemented by claims-conscious contractors that plan to compensate their low bids through future change orders by filing claims during construction which will only harm the project objectives [5]. This is one of the major drawbacks of the lowest bid
Recommended publications
  • Design-Build Manual
    Design-Build Manual M 3126.07 August 2021 Construction Division Design-Build Program Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Information Title VI Notice to Public It is the Washington State Department of Transportation’s (WSDOT) policy to assure that no person shall, on the grounds of race, color, national origin or sex, as provided by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise discriminated against under any of its programs and activities. Any person who believes his/her Title VI protection has been violated, may file a complaint with WSDOT’s Office of Equal Opportunity (OEO). For additional information regarding Title VI complaint procedures and/or information regarding our non- discrimination obligations, please contact OEO’s Title VI Coordinator at 360-705-7090. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Information This material can be made available in an alternate format by emailing the Office of Equal Opportunity at [email protected] or by calling toll free, 855-362-4ADA(4232). Persons who are deaf or hard of hearing may make a request by calling the Washington State Relay at 711. Foreword The Design-Build Manual has been prepared for Washington State Department of Transportation Engineering Managers, Design Engineers, Construction Engineers, Evaluators, Project Engineers, and other staff who are responsible for appropriately selecting, developing, and administering projects using design-build project delivery. This manual describes the processes and procedures for procuring and administering design-build contracts. Decisions to deviate from the guidance provided in this manual must be based on representing the best interests of the public and are to be made by the individual with appropriate authority.
    [Show full text]
  • State Construction Manual State of North Carolina
    State Construction Manual State of North Carolina Roy Cooper, Governor Department of Administration Machelle Sanders, Secretary State Construction Office Latif Kaid, P.E., Director 301 North Wilmington Street, Suite 450 Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2827 (919)807-4100 Fax (919)807-4110 www.nc-sco.com Twelveth Edition March 2019 Table of Contents CHAPTER 100 State Construction Office ................................................................................................. - 1 - Section 101 Jurisdiction ...................................................................................................................... - 1 - Section 102 Responsibility of State Construction Office ....................................................................... - 3 - Section 103 Other Responsibilities ...................................................................................................... - 4 - Section 104 Organization of State Construction Office ......................................................................... - 5 - Section 105 State Building Commission ............................................................................................... - 6 - Section 106 Forms and Guidelines ....................................................................................................... - 6 - CHAPTER 200 Agencies and Institution Capital Projects .......................................................................... - 7 - Section 201 Definitions ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Alliances in Construction: a Study of Contracting Relationships and Competitive Advantage in Public Sector Building Works
    STRATEGIC ALLIANCES IN CONSTRUCTION: A STUDY OF CONTRACTING RELATIONSHIPS AND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN PUBLIC SECTOR BUILDING WORKS TOMMY LOOSHANG KWOK MBuiltEnv, GradDipProjMgt, DipAcc, CertCivilEng SCHOOL OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND PROPERTY FACULTY OF BUILT ENVIRONMENT AND ENGINEERING QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Queensland University of Technology 1998 EXTERNAL THESIS EXAMINATION COMMITTEE Professor Martin Skitmore (Chair of Examiners) Director of Research Design and Construction Studies Research Concentration Queensland University of Technology Professor Murray Gillin Pro-Vice Chancellor (Academic) Swinburne University of Technology Professor Vernon Ireland Head of School Australian Graduate School of Engineering Innovation Dr John Woollett Chairman CMR Consultants TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract i Table of Contents iii List of Figures ix List of Tables x Statement of Original Authorship xii Acknowledgments xiii 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background to the Research 1 1.2 Research Framework 5 1.2.1 Problem 6 1.2.2 Questions 7 1.2.3 Objectives 7 1.2.4 Research Methodology 8 1.2.5 Delimitation of Scope 9 1.3 Justification for the Research 9 1.3.1 Effect on the National Economy 10 1.3.2 Application of Existing Theory 12 1.3.3 Limitation of Previous Research 13 1.3.4 Potential Applications 13 1.4 Key Findings and Results 14 1.5 Outline of the Thesis 15 1.6 Summary 16 2 REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE 17 2.1 Introduction 17 2.2 The Concept of Strategic Alliances
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling Construction Competitive Bidding: an Agent-Based Approach
    Modeling Construction Competitive Bidding: An Agent-Based Approach Sadegh Asgari Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2016 © 2016 Sadegh Asgari All rights reserved ABSTRACT Modeling Construction Competitive Bidding: An Agent-Based Approach Sadegh Asgari The construction industry is a complex, multi-level system that includes a large collection of independent, heterogeneous organizations and institutions and is associated with several economic sectors and markets. Because of its unique characteristics, the construction industry as one of the major economic sectors and contributors to the economic development of the nation needs its own specific and dedicated economics. The shortcomings of the existing methodologies call for the use of more sophisticated modeling tools that can capture more important aspects of the real world and its complexity in particular the interconnections among elements of the system, their idiosyncrasies, and emergent behavior. As a pioneer attempt in the exploration of a new theory of construction economics, this study aims to found the first building blocks of the comprehensive economic model of the construction industry. In this dissertation, an agent-based approach is applied to model the low-bid lump-sum construction competitive bidding by which most construction works are allocated. This model has several advantages over the previous analytical and empirical models including the capability of observing the bidding process dynamics, the interaction between the heterogeneous and learning agents, and the emergent bidding patterns arising from multiple scenarios of market conditions and contractors’ attributes. Then the model is used as a virtual laboratory for conducting a variety of experiments to answer several important research questions in the field of construction economics.
    [Show full text]
  • Real Estate Development Project Manager Job Description
    REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT MANAGER JOB DESCRIPTION About Northern Real Estate Urban Ventures, LLC We are a full service minority and woman-owned real estate development company who is a leading provider of real estate finance and development services for affordable housing, single--family homes, retail and commercial facilities in the Washington, DC metropolitan area. GENERAL RESPONSIBILITIES Development Project Manager is responsible for the financing, approvals and design of infrastructure, townhouse, condominium and affordable housing developments and mixed-use community development projects. Project Managers must provide high quality development management, managing financial objectives of the project, and meeting project objectives. In addition project managers are accountable for developing and fostering effective relationships internally and externally including all third parties (e.g., consultants, public funders and private lenders/equity providers, community organizations, architects, constructions managers, government liaisons, etc.) REAL ESTATE PROJECT MANAGEMENT Responsible for managing the predevelopment activities and project financing tasks of development project including affordable housing tax credit projects and other multifamily and mixed-use development projects Structure and close complex mixed-finance deals with multiple lenders including managing due diligence process Negotiate and draft letters of intent (LOI) for purchase with sellers Apply significant knowledge of LIHTC regulations and industry standards
    [Show full text]
  • REGULAR COUNCIL July 3, 2017
    REGULAR COUNCIL July 3, 2017 Mayor Henry called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. Clerk made note that Councilmembers Haverfield, Levi, Bruner, and Raymond were present. Councilmember Skaug was absent. Mayor Henry amended the consent agenda by removing item #21 - 1st Reading of Ordinance for Zoning Map Amendment from AG to BC at the southwest corner of W. Cherry Lane and N. Midland Blvd. for Shon Parks representing Derk Pardo - CIF Enterprises LLC and item #26 - 1st Reading of Ordinance Correcting the Legal Description for an Annexation and Zoning of 1101 E Hawaii Ave by Adding the Right of Way Property. MOVED by Haverfield and SECONDED by Raymond to approve the Consent Agenda with the above mentioned amendments; Regular Council Minutes of June 19, 2017; Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Minutes; Board of Appraisers Minutes of May 16, 2017; Airport Commission Minutes; Planning & Zoning Commission; Library Commission Minutes; IT Steering Committee Minutes; department reports, bills paid; The City Council dispenses with the three (3) reading rule of Idaho Code § 50-902 for all ordinances; final and preliminary plat approvals: 1) None; and authorize the following public hearings: 1) Zoning Map Amendment from RP to RML for the southerly approximate 150 ft of the property located at 412 E Hawaii Ave. (Section 34 T3N R2W, Kurtz Addition, Block 179, ½ adjacent vacated street on the north, and ½ the adjacent vacated street on the east and west) for Chance Hobbs – Moonlake Consulting, LLC; 2) Zoning Text Amendment of Section 10-1-12 A.4. – Off Site Vehicle Sales Events as Temporary Uses, increasing the number of off-site sales events per calendar year from one to six.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Bidding Process (00329434)
    City Attorneys’ Department Presents: Public Works Contracts in a Tough Economy: Tips and Techniques for City Attorneys Speakers: Jennifer Dauer, Partner, Diepenbrock Elkin LLP, Sacramento Clare Gibson, Partner, Jarvis Fay Doporto & Gibson, LLP, Oakland Tuesday, July 12, 2011 10:00 – 11:30 a.m. Webinar UNDERSTANDING THE PUBLIC CONSTRUCTION BIDDING PROCESS TABLE OF CONTENTS A. Authority Governing Public Contracting .................................................... 1 B. Void Contract Rule ..................................................................................... 4 C. Prequalification of Bidders ......................................................................... 6 D. Typical Contents and Requirements for an Invitation for Bids (“IFB”) ..... 6 1. Typical IFB Documents .................................................................. 6 2. Contractor is Not Responsible for Completeness of Plans ............. 7 3. Prevailing Wages ............................................................................ 8 4. Bid Security .................................................................................... 9 5. Performance and Payment Bonds ................................................... 9 6. Required Licenses ......................................................................... 10 7. Listing of Subcontractors .............................................................. 10 8. Brand and Trade Names................................................................ 14 9. Bidding Alternates .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 19Independent Agencies
    2006 Qualified Allocation Plan The mission of the Maine State Housing Authority is to assist Maine people to obtain and maintain decent, safe, affordable housing and services suitable to their unique housing needs. In carrying out this mission, the Maine State Housing Authority will provide leadership, maximize resources, and promote partnerships to develop and implement sound housing policy. 099 INDEPENDENT AGENCIES - NOT PART OF STATE GOVERNMENT 346 MAINE STATE HOUSING AUTHORITY CHAPTER 16 Allocation of State Ceiling for Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Summary: The Tax Reform Act of 1986 created the low-income housing tax credit for use by qualifying developers of housing projects which satisfy applicable tenant income and rental targeting requirements. The Maine State Housing Authority has been designated as the housing credit agency for the State responsible for allocation of the annual credit ceiling. This Rule establishes the policies and procedures for the allocation process. 1. Definitions A. “Accredited Investor” means an investor with adequate capacity as determined by MSHA. B. “Act” means the Maine Housing Authorities Act, 30-A M.R.S.A. §4701 et seq., as amended. C. “Affordable Housing TIF” means an affordable housing development program approved by MSHA pursuant to MSHA’s Affordable Housing Tax Increment Financing Program and the Act. D. “Applicable Fraction” means the fraction defined in Section 42(c)(1)(B) of the Code. E. “Applicable Percentage” means the percentage defined in Section 42(b) of the Code. F. “Applicant” means an individual or entity applying for Credit governed by this Rule or its successors and assigns, including without limitation the owner of the Project if the owner is not formed or established at the time of Application.
    [Show full text]
  • New Construction Delivery Methods Authorized for North Carolina Local Governments
    New Construction Delivery Methods Authorized for North Carolina Local Governments Norma Houston September 2013 Contents Overview ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Design Build Contracting ............................................................................................................. 3 Design-Build Bridging Contracting .............................................................................................. 7 Public Private Partnership Contracting ..................................................................................... 10 Reporting Requirements ........................................................................................................... 14 Cap on Mini-Brooks Act Exemption .......................................................................................... 14 Additional Design-Build Resources ........................................................................................... 15 Overview In 2013, the General Assembly enacted legislation authorizing three new contracting methods for public construction projects: design-build (DB), design-build bridging (DBB), and public- private partnerships (P3). S.L. 2013-401/H8571 (Public Contracts/Construction Methods/DB/P3) accomplishes this in three primary ways: 1. Amends G.S. 143-128 authorizing these new construction delivery methods for large building construction projects. 2. Requires governmental units to enter into these contracts under
    [Show full text]
  • WUSD Architect
    Request for Qualifications For Architectural and Design Services For the Planning, Modernizing, and Constructing of School Facilities In the Washington Unified School District Kevin Sanders, Director of Facilities Construction & Planning 930 Westacre Road West Sacramento, CA 95691 916-375-7600 Date of Issue: November 16, 2015 1 of 10 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) Architectural and Design Services BACKGROUND The Washington Unified School District (District) invites qualification submission proposals from qualified California licensed firms for architectural and design services associated with the planning, modernizing and construction of school facilities within the Washington Unified School District’s boundary. The purpose of this RFQ is to provide the District with a pre-qualified list of architects thus allowing the District to easily procure their services in a more expeditious manner as project needs arise. Prospective projects may include but are not limited to: Updating of the District’s Capital Investment Program Career Technical Education – Bryte Campus Phase II Additional Classroom Wing – River City High School New Elementary School #10 INFORMATION REGARDING THE RFQ The RFQ is currently available online from the Director of Facilities Construction & Planning Department office located at 930 Westacre Road, West Sacramento, CA 95691. The District is open to the public Monday thru Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. The District is an Equal Opportunity Employer and encourages proposals from minority, women-owned, and DVBE businesses. The RFQ is not a low-bid price competition. Instead, qualifications will be evaluated in accordance with the Evaluation Criteria stated in this RFQ. The District will first evaluate each firm’s written proposal in accordance with the Evaluation Criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • No-Bid Decision Modelling for Construction Projects
    BID/ NO-BID DECISION MODELLING FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS Abdulrahman Bagies 1 and Chris Fortune School of the Built Environment, Heriot-Watt University, Riccarton Campus, Edinburgh EH14 4AS Not bidding for a project could result in losing a good opportunity to make substantial profit, improve the contractor’s strength in the industry, gain relationship with the client, and more. However, bidding for inappropriate projects may result in large losses or the consumption of time and resources that could be invested in more profitable projects, ultimately even financial failure of the contractor. This dilemma expresses the importance of the bid / no bid decision till it become one of the most critical decisions that have to be made by construction companies. The high complex process is a major characteristic of the bidding decision, which involves a large quantity of objectives and reflection of several internal and external factors. Smart contractors realise the importance of doing initial research and project evaluation before committing themselves to a construction project. This paper reports on-going research aims to develop a framework that can be used as a decision aid for project evaluations at the initial project selection decision phase. The results from a review of the literature concerning the bid / no bid decision are presented, and a conceptual model is developed. The work aims to contribute to the body of knowledge available on project evaluation processes and the research agenda related to enterprise project management in the construction industry. Keywords: bid/no bid decision, decision making, project evaluation. INTRODUCTION One of the most critical decisions that have to be made by contractors in the construction industry is whether or not to bid for a new project when an invitation has been received.
    [Show full text]
  • UNION CITY Mayor's Park Storm Sewer Rehabilitation RFB-PS-19-02
    PROJECT MANUAL 11/27/2018 UNION CITY Mayor’s Park Storm Sewer Rehabilitation RFB-PS-19-02 FOR THE City of Union City, Georgia City of Union City 5047 Union Street Union City, Georgia 30291 MORELAND ALTOBELLI ASSOCIATES, LLC 2450 Commerce Avenue Suite 100 Duluth, Georgia 30096 Ph. (770) 263-5945 UNION CITY – MAYOR’S PARK STORM SEWER REHABILITATION SECTION 000110 - TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGES 000110 Table of Contents 1 Thru 2 000115 Index to Drawings 1 Thru 2 001113 Advertisement for Bids 1 Thru 3 002100 Instructions for Bidders 1 Thru 11 004100 Bid Form 1 Thru 15 004310 Bid Bond 1 Thru 2 005100 Notice of Award 1 Thru 1 005200 Agreement 1 Thru 7 005410 Certificate of Owner's Attorney 1 Thru 1 005500 Notice to Proceed 1 Thru 1 006110 Performance Bond 1 Thru 3 006115 Payment Bond 1 Thru 3 006276 Contractor Application for Payment 1 Thru 6 006516 Certificate of Substantial Completion 1 Thru 2 007000 General Conditions 1 Thru 70 008000 Supplementary Conditions 1 Thru 7 Exhibit A - Bidder Qualifications Notice A1 Thru A1 Exhibit B - Bid Rigging Notice B1 Thru B1 Exhibit C - OMIT Exhibit D - Compliance with Title VI of the D1 Thru D2 Civil Rights act of 1964 for Federal- Aid Contracts Exhibit E - Notice of Requirements for E1 Thru E3 Affirmative Action to Ensure Equal Employment Opportunity Exhibit F - OMIT Exhibit G- OMIT Exhibit H - OMIT Exhibit I - OMIT Exhibit J - Special Provision, Prompt Payment J1 Thru J1 Exhibit K - OMIT Exhibit L - OMIT Exhibit M - OMIT Exhibit N – GSICA Subcontractor Affidavit N1 Exhibit O - GDOT Specification
    [Show full text]