DOCSLIB.ORG

544 Final REPORT from the COMMISSION to the COUNCIL

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
544 Final REPORT from the COMMISSION to the COUNCIL COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 15.9.2003 COM(2003) 544 final REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Annual Report by the European Commission on the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region CONTENTS 1. Introduction 3 2. Reaffirmation and implementation of the "one country, two systèmes" 3 3. Institutional developments 5 4. Legislative Developments 7 5. Rights of assembly and demonstration. 10 6. The Economy 11 7. European union - Hong Kong relations. 12 8. Conclusion 14 2 HONG KONG: Annual Report 2002 1. INTRODUCTION As in the Commission’s previous annual reports, this 2002 report aims to assess the state of development of the Hong Kong SAR and its relations with the European Union. In accordance with the Commission’s mandate, the report analyses progress in the implementation of the “One Country, Two Systems” principle, and reviews developments in the legislative, institutional and individual rights fields. The document also provides an assessment of economic developments, and reports on the main aspects of EU-Hong Kong relations. 2. REAFFIRMATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE “ONE COUNTRY, TWO SYSTEMS” PRINCIPLE - Reaffirmation of the principle The Central Government of Beijing again reiterated its adherence to the “one country, two systems” principle in its official statements. In a speech to the National People’s Congress (NPC) on 5 March 2002, Prime Minister Zhu Rongji stated: “We should fully implement the principle of “one country, two systems” and the Basic Law of Hong Kong and Macao Special Administrative Regions. It is our firm and unswerving objective to maintain the long-term stability, prosperity and development there. The Central Government will continue to render full support to the efforts of the governments and Chief Executives of Hong Kong and Macao to govern the regions in accordance with the law, and it will further strengthen economic, trade, scientific, technological, cultural and education exchanges and cooperation between the Mainland and Hong Kong and Macao. We have full confidence in the futures of Hong Kong and Macao.” In a speech during the 1 July celebrations on the fifth anniversary of Hong Kong’s return to China and the inauguration of the second term of the HKSAR government, President Jiang Zemin said: “In a nutshell, what we have learnt in the past five years is that the policy of “one country, two systems” and the Basic Law of the Hong Kong SAR must be implemented in a comprehensive and accurate manner under all circumstances.” - Implementation of the principle • The practice of Falun Gong The Falun Gong, a legally registered group in Hong Kong, continues to enjoy the freedom to practice and does so in venues which include those run by government departments (Leisure and Cultural Services Department). 3 Nevertheless its practice and sit-in protest outside the Central People’s Government Liaison Office on 16 March was considered as causing obstruction. The police moved 16 Falun Gong demonstrators, including four from Switzerland, from outside the Central Government Liaison Office. Both police and demonstrators claimed to have sustained injuries during the removal. The 16 were subsequently arrested and charged with obstruction or assault. The trial started on 16 June with about 30 Falun Gong practitioners and a representative from the Swiss Consulate in Hong Kong in attendance. The verdict, delivered in mid-August, found all 16 guilty of causing public obstruction. Three were also convicted of assaulting police officers. They were fined between HK$ 1,300 and HK$ 3,800, well below the maximum penalties. In his verdict, the magistrate recalled that the right to protest and hold demonstrations is not absolute and its exercise requires a very delicate balance. The magistrate ruled that the arrests were lawful, noting that the 16 had ignored repeated warnings and that police officers had been sensible and reasonable in asking the practitioners to move on. • Right of abode The Court of Final Appeal ruled on 29 January 1999 with a broad definition of the right of abode of mainland Chinese in Hong Kong. The Court’s interpretation was then overturned in June 1999 by the interpretation of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress, made at the request of the HKSAR Government. 5,073 applicants in the appeals who considered themselves to be in the same situation as the parties to the case of 29 January 1999 claimed that they should have their claims for right of abode re-examined in accordance with the Appeal Court’s judgement. In a new ruling on 10 January 2002, the Court of Final Appeal ruled by a majority of four judges to one, that most of the claimants did not have the right of abode. However it recognised that several hundred appellants had a “legitimate expectation” based on reassurances from government departments and would be entitled to the same right of abode, as those involved in the Court’s 29 January ruling. The fifth judge’s opinion was that all the applicants should benefit from the notion of “legitimate expectation”. The majority verdict of the Court was warmly welcomed by academics, lawyers and the government, although some politicians and various social bodies urged the government to grant the right of abode to all applicants on humanitarian grounds. The SAR government decided to keep to the ruling of the Court of Final Appeal, but together with mainland authorities, agreed to a period of grace until the end of March to allow unsuccessful claimants to return to the mainland without being charged for illegally entering or overstaying in Hong Kong. Many of the unsuccessful claimants returned voluntarily ahead of the 31 March deadline. The government removed others who tried to remain illegally. The 10 January ruling of the Court of Final Appeal laid down broad legal principles in the handling of right of abode cases and -this could help to avoid future disputes over abode. 4 3. INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENTS – Election of the Chief Executive for a second term In the secondelections for Chief Executive in Hong Kong, the Chief Executive Mr Tung Chee-hwa was the only validly-nominated candidate. His nomination was supported by 714 of the 800-member Election Committee. Other candidates were de facto excluded, as nominations needed to be supported by at least 100 members, following the adoption of the Chief Executive Election Bill in 2001. Mr Tung was therefore elected for a second term at the end of February, without a formal vote. The legislator from the Legal constituency Margaret Ng, urged democratic forces to unite and make immediate preparations for the third Chief Executive elections. She apologised to the people of Hong Kong on behalf of the democratic parties for not having participated in the second election process (the democratic parties had an extensive debate about whether to participate in the election and failed to put up candidates in time). – Introduction of the accountability system As announced in his Policy Addresses of 2000 and 2001, the Chief Executive unveiled the accountability system for members of Government on 17 April 2002. The new scheme means that political appointees rather than senior civil servants have been put in charge of government departments. These new Secretaries serve for a contract period not exceeding the term of the Chief Executive, and are answerable to him for both policy-making and policy implementation. The Secretaries are fully accountable and may be required to resign for serious failure in policy outcome, serious mishaps in implementation or for grave personal misconduct. According to the Chief Executive, the new accountability system will have the following implications : – All Secretaries will also become members of the Executive Council (ExCo), which advises the Chief Executive and also includes members from the community and some legislators. – The top senior civil servants in each government department will be renamed Permanent Secretaries. Their responsibilities will be limited to policy implementation, rather than policy-making as in the past. – The government will seek to improve its working relationship with the legislature. All Secretaries will work personally with Legislative Council (LegCo) members and seek their support for policy and other initiatives. The new system was widely debated by academics, the media and LegCo members, who called for the new Secretaries to be also held accountable to LegCo by appearing for audition before appointment and by agreeing to resign should a motion of no confidence be adopted. Nonetheless, LegCo passed a government motion on 29 May endorsing the new system. On 24 June, the Chief Executive announced the composition of his new government, after approval by the Central Government. The new government took up its duties on 1 July, the date of commencement of the Chief Executive’s second term. 5 The first six months of the new system saw Government members become aware of their images vis-à-vis public opinion and LegCo members. This led some of them to make public statements on policy issues without apparent prior coordination within ExCo. After a public protest by an ExCo member, the Chief Executive called several brainstorming and co­ ordination meetings to establish more cohesion in the new government. The introduction of the accountability system on 1 July resulted in the traditional October Policy Address by the Chief Executive being postponed until January 2003. – Pace of democratisation The Basic Law stipulates that, after a review in 2007, elections for Chief Executive and all members of LegCo may be held by universal suffrage, which is the “ultimate aim” set by the Basic Law. An interview with Chinese Vice-Premier Qian Qichen in the South China Morning Post at the end of June triggered concerns among some about the commitment to these aims by both the Central and Hong Kong SAR Governments.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Legislative Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
    LC Paper No. CB(2)128/18-19 Legislative Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Subcommittee on Rights of Ethnic Minorities Report October 2018 - i - Acronyms and abbreviations Administrative Guidelines Administrative Guidelines on Promotion of Racial Equality B/Ds government bureaux and departments CCF Community Care Fund CHEER Centre for Harmony and Enhancement of Ethnic Minority Residents CIC Construction Industry Council CKR Central Kowloon Route CMAB Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Bureau CNL the Nationality Law of the People's Republic of China CoP Commission on Poverty CS Chief Secretary for Administration DH Department of Health DLR Discrimination Law Review D of Imm Director of Immigration EAA Estate Agents Authority EDB Education Bureau EM ethnic minority EM Unit Ethnic Minorities Unit EOC Equal Opportunities Commission ERB Employees Retaining Board ESA Employment Services Ambassador FDH foreign domestic helper GCSE General Certificate of Secondary Education HA Hospital Authority - ii - HAD Home Affairs Department HC House Committee HKCEE Hong Kong Certificate of Education Examination HD Housing Department HKDSE Hong Kong Diploma of Secondary Education Examination HKSAR Hong Kong Special Administrative Region iES Interactive Employment Service IFSC Integrated Family Service Centre ImmD Immigration Department ISC Integrated Services Centre KG kindergarten "Learning Framework" Chinese Language Curriculum Second Language Learning Framework LegCo Legislative Council LD Labour Department LIFA Low-income Working
    [Show full text]
  • Official Record of Proceedings
    HONG KONG LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL — 30 November 1994 1117 OFFICIAL RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Wednesday, 30 November 1994 The Council met at half-past Two o'clock PRESENT THE PRESIDENT THE HONOURABLE JOHN JOSEPH SWAINE, C.B.E., LL.D., Q.C., J.P. THE CHIEF SECRETARY THE HONOURABLE MICHAEL LEUNG MAN-KIN, C.B.E., J.P. THE FINANCIAL SECRETARY THE HONOURABLE SIR NATHANIEL WILLIAM HAMISH MACLEOD, K.B.E., J.P. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL THE HONOURABLE JEREMY FELL MATHEWS, C.M.G., J.P. THE HONOURABLE ALLEN LEE PENG-FEI, C.B.E., J.P. THE HONOURABLE MRS SELINA CHOW LIANG SHUK-YEE, O.B.E., J.P. THE HONOURABLE MARTIN LEE CHU-MING, Q.C., J.P. DR THE HONOURABLE DAVID LI KWOK-PO, O.B.E., LL.D., J.P. THE HONOURABLE NGAI SHIU-KIT, O.B.E., J.P. THE HONOURABLE PANG CHUN-HOI, M.B.E. THE HONOURABLE SZETO WAH THE HONOURABLE TAM YIU-CHUNG THE HONOURABLE ANDREW WONG WANG-FAT, O.B.E., J.P. THE HONOURABLE LAU WONG-FAT, O.B.E., J.P. THE HONOURABLE EDWARD HO SING-TIN, O.B.E., J.P. THE HONOURABLE FONALD JOSEPH ARCULLI, O.B.E., J.P. 1118 HONG KONG LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL — 30 November 1994 THE HONOURABLE MRS PEGGY LAM, O.B.E., J.P. THE HONOURABLE MRS MIRIAM LAU KIN-YEE, O.B.E., J.P. THE HONOURABLE LAU WAH-SUM, O.B.E., J.P. DR THE HONOURABLE LEONG CHE-HUNG, O.B.E., J.P. THE HONOURABLE JAMES DAVID McGREGOR, O.B.E., I.S.O., J.P.
    [Show full text]
  • The Portrayal of Female Officials in Hong Kong Newspapers
    Constructing perfect women: the portrayal of female officials in Hong Kong newspapers Francis L.F. Lee CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG, HONG KONG On 28 February 2000, the Hong Kong government announced its newest round of reshuffling and promotion of top-level officials. The next day, Apple Daily, one of the most popular Chinese newspapers in Hong Kong, headlined their full front-page coverage: ‘Eight Beauties Obtain Power in Newest Top Official Reshuffling: One-third Females in Leadership, Rarely Seen Internationally’.1 On 17 April, the Daily cited a report by regional magazine Asiaweek which claimed that ‘Hong Kong’s number of female top officials [is the] highest in the world’. The article states that: ‘Though Hong Kong does not have policies privileging women, opportunities for women are not worse than those for men.’ Using the prominence of female officials as evidence for gender equality is common in public discourse in Hong Kong. To give another instance, Sophie Leung, Chair of the government’s Commission for Women’s Affairs, said in an interview that women in Hong Kong have space for development, and she was quoted: ‘You see, Hong Kong female officials are so powerful!’ (Ming Pao, 5 February 2001). This article attempts to examine news discourses about female officials in Hong Kong. Undoubtedly, the discourses are complicated and not completely coherent. Just from the examples mentioned, one could see that the media embrace the relatively high ratio of female officials as a sign of social progress. But one may also question the validity of treating the ratio of female officials as representative of the situation of gender (in)equality in the society.
    [Show full text]
  • The Basic Law and Democratization in Hong Kong, 3 Loy
    Loyola University Chicago International Law Review Volume 3 Article 5 Issue 2 Spring/Summer 2006 2006 The aB sic Law and Democratization in Hong Kong Michael C. Davis Chinese University of Hong Kong Follow this and additional works at: http://lawecommons.luc.edu/lucilr Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Michael C. Davis The Basic Law and Democratization in Hong Kong, 3 Loy. U. Chi. Int'l L. Rev. 165 (2006). Available at: http://lawecommons.luc.edu/lucilr/vol3/iss2/5 This Feature Article is brought to you for free and open access by LAW eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Loyola University Chicago International Law Review by an authorized administrator of LAW eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE BASIC LAW AND DEMOCRATIZATION IN HONG KONG Michael C. Davist I. Introduction Hong Kong's status as a Special Administrative Region of China has placed it on the foreign policy radar of most countries having relations with China and interests in Asia. This interest in Hong Kong has encouraged considerable inter- est in Hong Kong's founding documents and their interpretation. Hong Kong's constitution, the Hong Kong Basic Law ("Basic Law"), has sparked a number of debates over democratization and its pace. It is generally understood that greater democratization will mean greater autonomy and vice versa, less democracy means more control by Beijing. For this reason there is considerable interest in the politics of interpreting Hong Kong's Basic Law across the political spectrum in Hong Kong, in Beijing and in many foreign capitals.
    [Show full text]
  • Democratic Paralysis and Potential in Post-Umbrella Movement Hong Kong Copyrighted Material of the Chinese University Press | All Rights Reserved Agnes Tam
    Hong Kong Studies, Vol. 1, No. 1 (Spring 2018), 83–99 In Name Only: Democratic Paralysis and Potential in Post-Umbrella Movement Hong Kong Copyrighted Material of The Chinese University Press | All Rights Reserved Agnes Tam Abstract The guiding principle of the 1997 Handover of Hong Kong was stability. The city’s status quo is guaranteed by Article 5 of the Basic Law, which stipulates the continued operation of economic and political systems for fifty years after the transition from British to Chinese sovereignty. Since the Handover, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress (NPCSC) have imposed purposive interpretations on the Basic Law that restrict Hongkongers’ civil participation in local politics. Some official documents of Hong Kong, such as court judgments and public statements, show how the Hong Kong government avails itself to perpetuate such discursive violence through manipulating a linguistic vacuum left by translation issues in legal concepts and their cultural connotations in Chinese and English languages. Twenty years after the Handover, the promise of stability and prosperity in fifty years of unchangedness exists in name only. Highlighting this connection, this article exemplifies the fast-disappearing space for the freedom of expression and for the nominal status quo using the ephemeral appearance of a light installation, Our 60-Second Friendship Begins Now. Embedding the artwork into the skyline of Hong Kong, the artists of this installation adopted the administration’s re-interpretation strategy and articulated their own projection of Hong Kong’s bleak political future through the motif of a count- down device. This article explicates how Hongkongers are compelled to explore alternative spaces to articulate counter-discourses that bring the critical situation of Hong Kong in sight.
    [Show full text]
  • Hong Kong's Endgame and the Rule of Law (Ii): the Battle Over "The People" and the Business Community in the Transition to Chinese Rule
    HONG KONG'S ENDGAME AND THE RULE OF LAW (II): THE BATTLE OVER "THE PEOPLE" AND THE BUSINESS COMMUNITY IN THE TRANSITION TO CHINESE RULE JACQUES DELISLE* & KEVIN P. LANE- 1. INTRODUCTION Transitional Hong Kong's endgame formally came to a close with the territory's reversion to Chinese rule on July 1, 1997. How- ever, a legal and institutional order and a "rule of law" for Chi- nese-ruled Hong Kong remain works in progress. They will surely bear the mark of the conflicts that dominated the final years pre- ceding Hong Kong's legal transition from British colony to Chinese Special Administrative Region ("S.A.R."). Those endgame conflicts reflected a struggle among adherents to rival conceptions of a rule of law and a set of laws and institutions that would be adequate and acceptable for Hong Kong. They unfolded in large part through battles over the attitudes and allegiance of "the Hong Kong people" and Hong Kong's business community. Hong Kong's Endgame and the Rule of Law (I): The Struggle over Institutions and Values in the Transition to Chinese Rule ("Endgame I") focused on the first aspect of this story. It examined the political struggle among members of two coherent, but not monolithic, camps, each bound together by a distinct vision of law and sover- t Special Series Reprint: Originally printed in 18 U. Pa. J. Int'l Econ. L. 811 (1997). Assistant Professor, University of Pennsylvania Law School. This Article is the second part of a two-part series. The first part appeared as Hong Kong's End- game and the Rule of Law (I): The Struggle over Institutions and Values in the Transition to Chinese Rule, 18 U.
    [Show full text]
  • Kwok Wing Hang and Others V Chief Executive in Council and Another
    Department of Justice The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Summary of Judgment Kwok Wing Hang and Others v Chief Executive in Council and Another Leung Kwok Hung v Secretary for Justice and Another CACV 541, 542 & 583/2019 (on appeal from HCAL 2945/2019 and 2949/2019); [2020] HKCA 192 Decision : Respondents’ Appeal on (1) the ERO allowed, and (2) the PFCR partially allowed Applicants’ Cross Appeals dismissed Date of Hearing : 9-10 January 2020 Date of Judgment/Decision : 9 April 2020 Background 1. These are the appeals of the Chief Executive in Council (“CEIC”) and the Secretary for Justice (“SJ”), and the cross appeals of Mr Leung Kwok Hung (“Mr Leung”) and 24 Members of the Legislative Council (“LegCo”), against the Judgment of the Court of First Instance (“CFI”) dated 18 November 2019 (“CFI Judgment”) and the Decision of the CFI (on the questions of relief and costs) dated 22 November 2019 (“Decision”) allowing the application for judicial review and holding (i) the Emergency Regulations Ordinance (Cap. 241) (“ERO”) and the Prohibition on Face Covering Regulation (Cap. 241K) (“PFCR”) made thereunder unconstitutional and invalid (“Tier 1 Challenge”); and (ii) PFCR ss.3(1)(b) – (d) and s.5 unconstitutional and void (“Tier 2 Challenge”). 2. The background facts can be found in paras. 1-20 of the Judgment of the Court of Appeal (“CA”).1 3. The grounds for judicial review are repeated in para. 29 of the CA’s Judgment.2 1 In summary, since June 2019, Hong Kong had experienced serious social unrests and public disorders marked by protests, escalating violence, vandalisms and arsons arising from the Fugitive Offenders and Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters Legislation (Amendment) Bill 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6 Hong Kong
    CHAPTER 6 HONG KONG Key Findings • The Hong Kong government’s proposal of a bill that would allow for extraditions to mainland China sparked the territory’s worst political crisis since its 1997 handover to the Mainland from the United Kingdom. China’s encroachment on Hong Kong’s auton- omy and its suppression of prodemocracy voices in recent years have fueled opposition, with many protesters now seeing the current demonstrations as Hong Kong’s last stand to preserve its freedoms. Protesters voiced five demands: (1) formal with- drawal of the bill; (2) establishing an independent inquiry into police brutality; (3) removing the designation of the protests as “riots;” (4) releasing all those arrested during the movement; and (5) instituting universal suffrage. • After unprecedented protests against the extradition bill, Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam suspended the measure in June 2019, dealing a blow to Beijing which had backed the legislation and crippling her political agenda. Her promise in September to formally withdraw the bill came after months of protests and escalation by the Hong Kong police seeking to quell demonstrations. The Hong Kong police used increasingly aggressive tactics against protesters, resulting in calls for an independent inquiry into police abuses. • Despite millions of demonstrators—spanning ages, religions, and professions—taking to the streets in largely peaceful pro- test, the Lam Administration continues to align itself with Bei- jing and only conceded to one of the five protester demands. In an attempt to conflate the bolder actions of a few with the largely peaceful protests, Chinese officials have compared the movement to “terrorism” and a “color revolution,” and have im- plicitly threatened to deploy its security forces from outside Hong Kong to suppress the demonstrations.
    [Show full text]
  • B21900401.Pdf
    Table of Contents Abstract------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------V Acknowledgements-------------------------------------------------------------- --------------IX List of Figures and tables--------------------------------------------------------------------- XI List of Abbreviations------------------------------------------------------------------------- XII Chapter 1 Introduction ............................................................................ 1 1.1. Research background ..................................................................... 1 1.1.1. Two different approaches to the study of language contact and language change ................................................................................... 1 1.1.2. Linguistic borrowing as a specific social behavior ................................ 3 1.1.3. Constraints on Morphosyntactic borrowing........................................... 6 1.1.4. Morphosyntactic borrowing in Hong Kong Written Chinese ................ 8 1.2. Objectives of this study ................................................................. 9 1.3. The data ........................................................................................ 11 1.4. The organization of this dissertation ............................................ 12 Chapter 2 Literature Review ................................................................. 14 2.0. Introduction .................................................................................. 14 2.1. The theory
    [Show full text]
  • 1998 Human Rights Report - Hong Kong Page 1 of 8
    1998 Human Rights Report - Hong Kong Page 1 of 8 The State Department web site below is a permanent electro information released prior to January 20, 2001. Please see w material released since President George W. Bush took offic This site is not updated so external links may no longer func us with any questions about finding information. NOTE: External links to other Internet sites should not be co endorsement of the views contained therein. U.S. Department of State Hong Kong Country Report on Human Rights Practices for 1998 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, February 26, 1999. HONG KONG Hong Kong reverted from British to Chinese sovereignty on July 1, 1997. As a Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China, it enjoys a high degree of autonomy except in defense and foreign affairs and remains a free society with legally protected rights. The Basic Law, approved in 1990 by China's National People's Congress, provides for fundamental rights and serves as a "mini­ constitution." A chief executive, selected by a 400-person selection committee chosen by a China- appointed preparatory committee, wields executive power. A legislature composed of directly and indirectly elected members was sworn in on July 1. Upon reversion, China, which had objected to the electoral rules instituted by the British colonial government, dissolved Hong Kong's first fully elected Legislative Council. A 60-member Provisional Legislature, chosen by the selection committee that named the Chief Executive, took office on July 1, 1997. Critics contended that the selection of the Provisional Legislature had no basis in law and was designed to exclude groups or individuals critical of China.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes Have Been Seen by the Administration) Ref : CB2/PL/WS
    立法會 Legislative Council LC Paper No. CB(2)2010/17-18 (These minutes have been seen by the Administration) Ref : CB2/PL/WS Panel on Welfare Services Minutes of special meeting held on Thursday, 19 July 2018, at 2:30 pm in Conference Room 1 of the Legislative Council Complex Members : Hon SHIU Ka-chun (Chairman) present Hon KWONG Chun-yu (Deputy Chairman) Hon LEUNG Yiu-chung Hon CHAN Chi-chuen Hon LEUNG Che-cheung, SBS, MH, JP Dr Hon KWOK Ka-ki Hon KWOK Wai-keung, JP Dr Hon Helena WONG Pik-wan Hon POON Siu-ping, BBS, MH Hon Alvin YEUNG Hon Andrew WAN Siu-kin Hon CHU Hoi-dick Dr Hon Junius HO Kwan-yiu, JP Hon Wilson OR Chong-shing, MH Hon YUNG Hoi-yan Members : Hon Mrs Regina IP LAU Suk-yee, GBS, JP absent Hon Michael TIEN Puk-sun, BBS, JP Dr Hon Fernando CHEUNG Chiu-hung Dr Hon Pierre CHAN Hon LUK Chung-hung, JP - 2 - Public Officers : Item I attending Dr LAW Chi-kwong, GBS, JP Secretary for Labour and Welfare Labour and Welfare Bureau Miss Leonia TAI, JP Deputy Secretary for Labour and Welfare (Welfare) 1 Labour and Welfare Bureau Mr LAM Ka-tai, JP Deputy Director of Social Welfare (Services) Social Welfare Department Mr TAN Tick-yee Assistant Director (Elderly) Social Welfare Department Mr KOK Che-leung Assistant Director (Rehabilitation and Medical Social Services) Social Welfare Department Mr Kenneth WOO Chief Executive Officer (Subventions/Planning) Social Welfare Department Attendance : Item I by invitation 社區發展陣線 Mr NG Kwan-lim 副主席 Mr CHOW Nok-hang 黃雅文小姐 袁慧妍小姐 Mr YUEN Hoi-man - 3 - Ms HUI Wun-wun Democratic Alliance for the Betterment
    [Show full text]
  • Hong Kong : the Facts
    Government Flying Service Government Flying Service (GFS) is one of the disciplined Search and Rescue: One of the major tasks of GFS is services of the Government of the Hong Kong Special search and rescue. The area of responsibility covers the Administrative Region. As at December 31, 2020, it has an majority of the South China Sea up to 1 300 kilometers south establishment of 324 personnel responsible for flight of Hong Kong. operations, aircraft maintenance and administration. GFS The Challenger 605 (CL-605) fixed wing aircraft are used Headquarters is located at the south-western corner of the as the initial search aircraft for long range search and rescue Hong Kong International Airport at north Lantau. operations and to guide helicopters directly to the scene, thus maximising the helicopters’ effective range and/or time History of GFS: GFS began operating on April 1, 1993 on scene by eliminating their need to search. immediately after the disbandment of its predecessor, the The Airbus H175 helicopters, equipped with advanced Royal Hong Kong Auxiliary Air Force. avionics and mission equipment, are capable of automatic approach to a hover for day and night search and rescue Vision: To be recognised worldwide as a provider of operations. In addition to mountain rescue missions within excellent search, rescue and aviation support services. Hong Kong, the H175 helicopters provide core search and rescue services, covering an offshore area up to 370 Mission: GFS is committed to serving the community and kilometers from Hong Kong. The range of the H175 the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative helicopters can be further extended if refuelling is available Region by providing 24-hour aviation support through from oilrigs in the South China Sea.
    [Show full text]