DOCSLIB.ORG

Response to Comments on the Draft Supplemental EIS1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Response to Comments on the Draft Supplemental EIS1 Chapter 19: Response to Comments on the Draft Supplemental EIS1 A. INTRODUCTION This chapter summarizes and responds to comments on the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (DSEIS) received during the public comment period. Public review began in May 2004 with the publication of the DSEIS. The New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) held a public hearing on June 24, 2004. Sections B and C list all agencies, elected officials, organizations, and individuals that commented on the DSEIS. Section D contains a summary of all comments made and a response to each of those comments. These summaries convey the substance of the comments made, but do not necessarily quote the comments verbatim. Comments are organized by subject matter and generally parallel the chapter structure of the FSEIS. Where similar views were expressed by more than one commenter, those comments have been grouped and addressed together. B. LIST OF ORGANIZATIONS AND INDIVIDUALS WHO COMMENTED AT THE HEARING ON THE DSEIS ELECTED OFFICIALS 1. Martin Connor, New York State Senator 2. Alan Gerson, New York City Council Member 3. Deborah Glick, New York State Assembly Member 4. Sheldon Silver, New York State Assembly Speaker ORGANIZATIONS 5. Battery Park City United, Helene Seeman 6. Civic Alliance to Rebuild Downtown New York (Civic Alliance), Petra Todorovich 7. Clean Air Campaign, Marcy Benstock 8. Coalition to Save West Street, John Dellaportas 9. Community Board 1, Richard Kennedy, Vice Chairman 10. Downtown Alliance, Jennifer Hensley 11. Environmental Defense, Ariel Tesher 12. Gateway Plaza Tenants Association, Jeff Galloway 13. General Contractors Association of New York, Jeff Elmer 1 This chapter is new for the FSEIS. 19-1 Route 9A Project FSEIS 14. Institute for Rational Urban Mobility (IRUM), George Haikalis 15. Lower Manhattan Emergency Preservation Fund (LMEPF), Ken Lustbader 16. Permanent Citizens Advisory Committee to the MTA (PCAC), William Henderson, Associate Director 17. Rebuild Downtown Our Town, Jesse Pozzuoli 18. Regional Planning Association (RPA), Petra Todorovich 19. Straphangers Campaign, Gene Russianoff 20. Tri-State Transportation Campaign, Nancy Christensen 21. World Trade Center Committee, Richard Kennedy, Chairman 22. World Trade Center Environmental Organization (WTC Environmental Organization), Jenna Orkin 23. World Trade Center Restoration Movement (WTC Restoration Movement), Louis Epstein INDIVIDUALS 24. Kathleen Bachand, Resident of Battery Park City 25. Joanne Chernow, Resident of Battery Park City 26. Steven Faust, American Institute of Certified Planners 27. Laura Hegedus, Resident of 225 Rector Place 28. Betty Heller, Resident of Battery Park City 29. Peter Levenson, 90 West Street 30. Thornton Lathrop, Resident of Battery Park City 31. Frederick Ling, Resident of Battery Park City, licensed engineer 32. Bill Love, Resident of Battery Park City, Coalition to Save West Street, Vice Chair 33. Lois McNally, Resident of Battery Park City 34. Ben Hemric, Resident of Soho 35. Jean Silliman, Resident of Battery Park City, member of Coalition to Save West Street 36. Michael Sinansky, Resident of Battery Park City, licensed engineer 37. Robert Thibault, Resident of the West Village 38. Karlene Wiese, Resident of Battery Park City C. LIST OF ORGANIZATIONS AND INDIVIDUALS WHO E-MAILED COMMENTS ON THE DSEIS ORGANIZATIONS 39. AAA Automobile Club of New York 40. Coalition of 911 Families, Anthony Gardner, Executive Board Member 41. Community Board No. 1 42. Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America 19-2 Chapter 19: Response to Comments on the DSEIS 43. Hudson River Park Trust (HRPT), Noreen Doyle, Executive Vice President 44. Langan Engineering and Environmental Services, George Leventis INDIVIDUALS 45. Monique Balsamo, Resident of Battery Park City 46. Barbara Beehler, Resident of Battery Park City 47. Claudia Bogdanos, Resident of Battery Park City 48. Debra Bogosian, Resident of Battery Park City 49. Arline L. Bronzaft, Ph.D 50. Alexander Butziger 51. Martin E. Coleman, Resident of Gateway Plaza 52. Justine Cuccia, Resident of Battery Park City 53. Russell D’Oench III, Resident of Battery Park City 54. Susan Duffy, Resident of Battery Park City 55. Brett Goldman 56. Gerald A. Hanweck, Ph.D., Resident of Lower Manhattan 57. Benjamin Hemric 58. Todd Hirschberg, Resident of 200 Rector Place 59. Jeff Holck 60. KP Hudzen, Resident of Battery Park City 61. Richard Joffe, Resident of 380 Rector Place 62. Michael Keit 63. Jerry Killiam, Resident of Battery Park City 64. Joe Loltisko, Resident of Battery Park City 65. Julie Kuehndorf, Resident of Battery Park City 66. Denise Levine 67. Harry Malakoff, Resident of West 12th Street 68. Jane Mancino, Resident of Battery Park City 69. Lisa Margolin, Resident of Battery Park City 70. Sigi Moeslinger, Resident of Rector Street 71. Maria Ouranitsas, Resident of Battery Park City 72. Rebuild Downtown Our Town, Jeff Pozzuoli 73. Bob Rosen, Resident of Liberty House 74. Rafael Saenz 75. Richard Schuemacher, Resident of Battery Park City 76. Helen Seemen 77. Dave Stanke 19-3 Route 9A Project FSEIS 78. Erika Sullivan, Resident of downtown Manhattan 79. Denis Tim, Resident of Gateway Plaza 80. Eric Tucker, Resident of Battery Park City 81. Saint Nicholas Church, DJ Hodson 82. Angelique Vandervis, Resident of Battery Park City 83. Emily Weschsler, Resident of Rector Place 84. Andrew Williams, Matrix Partners International D. LIST OF ORGANIZATIONS AND INDIVIDUALS WHO MAILED OR FAXED COMMENTS ON THE DSEIS ORGANIZATIONS 85. ABNY, William C. Rudin, Chairman 86. AT&T, Sarah M. Ayer, Senior Attorney 87. The Battery Conservancy, Warrie Price 88. Battery Park City Authority, Timothy S. Carey, President & CEO 89. Brookfield, John E. Zuccotti, Chairman 90. Building Trades Employers’ Association (BTEANYC), Louis J. Coletti, President & CEO 91. Cadwalader, W. Christopher White 92. City of New York Parks & Recreation (Parks), Joshua Laird 93. CBRE, CB Richard Ellis 94. Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton (Cleary Gottlieb), Allan G. Sperling 95. Coalition to Save West Street, William C. Love, Jr. 96. Cobbler Express, Carmine Colletti 97. Community Board No. 1 (CB No. 1) 98. Cooper, Robertson & Partners, Alexander Cooper, Partner 99. Downtown Lower Manhattan Association, Inc., Robert Douglass 100. Ehrenkrantz, Eckstut & Kuhn Architects, Stanton Eckstut, Principal 101. EPA, Robert Hargrove, Chief 102. Goldman Sachs, Timur Galen, Managing Director 103. Gruzen Samton LLP, Jordan L. Gruzen, Partner 104. Hamilton, Rabinovitz & Alschuler (HR&A), John H. Alschuler, Jr. 105. Helfand Architecture, Margaret Helfand 106. Hudson River Park Trust (HRPT), Noreen Doyle, Executive Vice President 107. Lower Manhattan Emergency Preservation Fund (LMEPF), Ken Lustbader 108. Morgan & Finnegan, LLP, Christopher A. Hughes 109. New York Building Congress, Richard Anderson 19-4 Chapter 19: Response to Comments on the DSEIS 110. New York City Department of Transportation (NYCDOT), Naim Rasheed, Chief 111. Real Estate Board of New York (REBNY), Steven Spinola, President 112. SouthWestNY, Abraham Merchant 113. Verizon, John Bachmore, Director 114. World Financial Center Arts & Events Program (WFC), Debra Simon, Executive Director INDIVIDUALS 115. Benjamin Hemric 116. Thornton Lathrop, Resident of Battery Park City 117. Frederick F. Ling, University of Texas at Austin 118. Leonard Litwin 119. T. Nga Trinh 120. Douglas A. Willinger, Takoma Park Highway Design Studio E. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES PROCESS Comment 1: It’s difficult to proceed when it appears that the decision has already been made by a governor who has tunnel vision, and a Battery Park City president who has yet to demonstrate harmony with Battery Park City residents. (Silliman, Hegedus) Who is making this decision? We want to know where the democratic process is. Does the governor ever hear the unanimity with which we are speaking? Anyone that has walked around the neighborhood knows that the concept of this tunnel is absurd and unnecessary, but he is the only one that supports it. (BPC United) The only people who favor this tunnel are those who would directly profit from its construction. Why don’t politicians (Pataki in particular) do something for the true benefit of the people instead of taking care of friends and business associates? (Hudzen, Coleman) Response: NYSDOT is obligated, by law, to follow the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process. After considering all of the data and information contained in the FSEIS together with the data, information, and coments received throughout the public comment period, NYSDOT, in cooperation with FHWA, will identify a preferred alternative in the FSEIS. The selection of a preferred alternative will be made based on an objective application of the project’s goals and objectives as outlined in Chapter 1, Purpose and Need,” as measured against all available data, information, and comments. See Chapter 2A, “Preferred Alternative,” for a discussion of the Preferred Alternative. 19-5 Route 9A Project FSEIS Comment 2: The fundamental problem is the Department’s attempt to piggy-back this so- called Supplemental EIS onto another EIS that was produced in 1994. Under environmental law that is patently illegal. Manhattan is particularly different than it was then and it is absurd to base a 2004 analysis on 1994 numbers. We believe that a complete new EIS is required, at least for the tunnel alternatives, and that the SEIS process does not meet legal requirements. (Coalition to Save West Street) If you do a Supplemental EIS, the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Energy Star Qualified Buildings
    1 ENERGY STAR® Qualified Buildings As of 1-1-03 Building Address City State Alabama 10044 3535 Colonnade Parkway Birmingham AL Bellsouth City Center 600 N 19th St. Birmingham AL Arkansas 598 John L. McClellan Memorial Veterans Hospital 4300 West 7th Street Little Rock AR Arizona 24th at Camelback 2375 E Camelback Phoenix AZ Phoenix Federal Courthouse -AZ0052ZZ 230 N. First Ave. Phoenix AZ 649 N. Arizona VA Health Care System - Prescott 500 Highway 89 North Prescott AZ America West Airlines Corporate Headquarters 111 W. Rio Salado Pkwy. Tempe AZ Tempe, AZ - Branch 83 2032 West Fourth Street Tempe AZ 678 Southern Arizona VA Health Care System-Tucson 3601 South 6th Avenue Tucson AZ Federal Building 300 West Congress Tucson AZ Holualoa Centre East 7810-7840 East Broadway Tucson AZ Holualoa Corporate Center 7750 East Broadway Tucson AZ Thomas O' Price Service Center Building #1 4004 S. Park Ave. Tucson AZ California Agoura Westlake 31355 31355 Oak Crest Drive Agoura CA Agoura Westlake 31365 31365 Oak Crest Drive Agoura CA Agoura Westlake 4373 4373 Park Terrace Dr Agoura CA Stadium Centre 2099 S. State College Anaheim CA Team Disney Anaheim 700 West Ball Road Anaheim CA Anahiem City Centre 222 S Harbor Blvd. Anahiem CA 91 Freeway Business Center 17100 Poineer Blvd. Artesia CA California Twin Towers 4900 California Ave. Bakersfield CA Parkway Center 4200 Truxton Bakersfield CA Building 69 1 Cyclotron Rd. Berkeley CA 120 Spalding 120 Spalding Dr. Beverly Hills CA 8383 Wilshire 8383 Wilshire Blvd. Beverly Hills CA 9100 9100 Wilshire Blvd. Beverly Hills CA 9665 Wilshire 9665 Wilshire Blvd.
    [Show full text]
  • Modernization | Supplement
    >Modernization | Supplement Modernized by ™ The hidden data The birthplace of Data center Inside Intel: From center sector the Internet surgery fab to data center > Why build new, when > First came AOL, then > Changing a live > They used it to you can upgrade what Infomart; now it's time facility without going build chips. Now it's you already have? for Stack Infrastructure down isn't easy simulating them INSIDE EcoStruxureINSIGHTS IT delivers into your data center architecture. Looking for a better way to manage your data centers in the cloud and at the edge? EcoStruxure™ IT — the world’s first cloud-based DCIM — delivers visibility and actionable insights, anywhere, any time. ecostruxureit.com ©2019 Schneider Electric. All Rights Reserved. Schneider Electric | Life Is On and EcoStruxure are trademarks and the property of Schneider Electric SE, its subsidiaries, and affiliated companies. 998_20464516_GMA-US 998_20464516_GMA-US.indd 1 1/23/19 4:40 PM A Special Supplement to DCD February 2019 Modernized by Contents Giving your facilities a new lease of life Features 4-5 The hidden data ome people want low-investment fixes like airflow shiny new things. improvements). And some center sector Others make a point buildings are such prime locations 6-7 From AOL to Stack of sweating their that there's no choice but to refit. Infrastructure assets and keeping equipment in use Stack Infrastructure is presiding 8-9 Advertorial: Suntil it has more than paid for itself. over a rebuild of a facility once modernize or Neither group is right. owned by AOL in the early days of outsource? When a facility is no longer the commercial Internet (p6), and capable of maintaining its peak a couple of New York skyscrapers 10-11 Data center performance, a full replacement house data centers that have been surgery can be hard to justify, but there will upgraded multiple times.
    [Show full text]
  • Civic Center Two Bridges South Street Seaport Battery Park City Tribeca
    Neighborhood Map ¯ Worth Street Lafayette Street American Jacob Centre St Hamill Daniel Patrick Moynihan Sentinels Javits Thomas Place Playground 211 2 1 210 Sculpture First Shearith 151 325 United States Plaza Paine New York State Israel Cemetery One 60 Hudson Street Park District Courthouse 347 Hudson Street 1 Jacob K. Javits Supreme Court Oliver Street 45 43 Chinatown St. James Monroe Street 77 Federal Building 51 M9 Partnership Triangle M15SBS M15SBS H M103 Harrison Street Thomas Street St. James Place Church StreetChurch u Broadway West St. Joseph’s d M20 25 s Thomas Street Triumph of o 54 Church Staple Street 55 n the Human Spirit Jay Street PlaceTrimble R Manhattan Sculpture 57 i v Sentinels e M9 St. James’ r United States Court Park Row Knickerbocker 199 Sculpture 200 E Pearl Street M103 James Street M15 137 Tribeca s 332 Greenwich Street 311 Church Village p 42 M20 of International Trade SBS l 165 Tower Plaza a Foley Alfred E. Smith n a M15 d Square Thurgood Marshall Broadway 43 Playground e Borough of Manhattan 331 91 127 125 United States M15 Duane Street 163 151 149 Madison StreetSBS Community College Duane 154 M15 Catherine Street Park Duane Street Duane Street Courthouse 33 M22 Duane Street Chatham 79 African Burial Ground Green Cherry St 29 158 Cardinal Hayes Place West Street National Monument Tanahey African Catholic Church Security zone, M55 2 no access Playground M55 Burial Ground of St. Andrew Monroe Street Visitor Center Pearl Street Alfred E. Smith 130 321 Tribeca 2 Houses 52 50 86 84 Reade Street 120 114 112 Civic 198 Reade Street Washington Reade Street Street Elk Market Park Bogardus Surrogate’s Stuyvesant Sun Plaza 165 156 Two Bridges Court Center Catherine Slip 287 High 95 Building 311 1 Police Madison Street Alfred E.
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 Labeled Buildings List Final Feb6 Bystate
    ENERGY STAR® Qualified Buildings and Manufacturing Plants As of December 31, 2007 Building/Plant Name City State Building/Plant Type Alabama Calhoun County Administration Building Anniston AL Courthouse Calhoun County Court House Anniston AL Courthouse 10044 Birmingham AL Office Alabama Operations Center Birmingham AL Office BellSouth City Center Birmingham AL Office Birmingham Homewood TownePlace Suites by Marriott Birmingham AL Hotel/Motel Roberta Plant Calera AL Cement Plant Honda Manufacturing of Alabama, LLC Lincoln AL Auto Assembly Plant Alaska Elmendorf AFB, 3MDG, DoD/VA Joint Venture Hospital Elmendorf Air Force Base AK Hospital Arizona 311QW - Phoenix Chandler Courtyard Chandler AZ Hotel/Motel Bashas' Chandler AZ Supermarket/Grocery Bashas' Food City Chandler AZ Supermarket/Grocery Phoenix Cement Clarkdale AZ Cement Plant Flagstaff Embassy Suites Flagstaff AZ Hotel/Motel Fort Defiance Indian Hospital Fort Defiance AZ Hospital 311K5 - Phoenix Mesa Courtyard Mesa AZ Hotel/Motel 100 North 15th Avenue Building Phoenix AZ Office 1110 West Washington Building Phoenix AZ Office 24th at Camelback Phoenix AZ Office 311JF - Phoenix Camelback Courtyard Phoenix AZ Hotel/Motel 311K3 - Courtyard Phoenix Airport Phoenix AZ Hotel/Motel 311K4 - Phoenix North Courtyard Phoenix AZ Hotel/Motel 3131 East Camelback Phoenix AZ Office 57442 - Phoenix Airport Residence Inn Phoenix AZ Hotel/Motel Arboleda Phoenix AZ Office Bashas' Food City Phoenix AZ Supermarket/Grocery Biltmore Commerce Center Phoenix AZ Office Biltmore Financial Center I Phoenix AZ
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5. Historic Resources 5.1 Introduction
    CHAPTER 5. HISTORIC RESOURCES 5.1 INTRODUCTION 5.1.1 CONTEXT Lower Manhattan is home to many of New York City’s most important historic resources and some of its finest architecture. It is the oldest and one of the most culturally rich sections of the city. Thus numerous buildings, street fixtures and other structures have been identified as historically significant. Officially recognized resources include National Historic Landmarks, other individual properties and historic districts listed on the State and National Registers of Historic Places, properties eligible for such listing, New York City Landmarks and Historic Districts, and properties pending such designation. National Historic Landmarks (NHL) are nationally significant historic places designated by the Secretary of the Interior because they possess exceptional value or quality in illustrating or interpreting the heritage of the United States. All NHLs are included on the National Register, which is the nation’s official list of historic properties worthy of preservation. Historic resources include both standing structures and archaeological resources. Historically, Lower Manhattan’s skyline was developed with the most technologically advanced buildings of the time. As skyscraper technology allowed taller buildings to be built, many pioneering buildings were erected in Lower Manhattan, several of which were intended to be— and were—the tallest building in the world, such as the Woolworth Building. These modern skyscrapers were often constructed alongside older low buildings. By the mid 20th-century, the Lower Manhattan skyline was a mix of historic and modern, low and hi-rise structures, demonstrating the evolution of building technology, as well as New York City’s changing and growing streetscapes.
    [Show full text]
  • New York City Department of Transportation
    INNOVATIONS & ACCOMPLISHMENTS East River Bridges A $3.14 billion reconstruction program is underway to rehabilitate all four East River crossings. In 2005, these bridges carried some 498,213 vehicles per day. In 2002, working in coordination with the NYPD and other law enforcement agencies, the Division implemented enhanced security measures on these bridges. This work is ongoing. BROOKLYN BRIDGE The Brooklyn Bridge carried some 132,210 vehicles per day in 2005. The $547 million reconstruction commenced in 1980 with Contract #1, and will continue with Contract #6, currently in the design phase and scheduled for completion in 2013. This contract will include the rehabilitation of both approaches and ramps, the painting of the entire suspension bridge, as well as the seismic retrofitting of the structural elements that are within the Contract #6 project limits. Engineering Landmark Plaque. (Credit: Russell Holcomb) 1899 Plaque Near the Franklin Truss of the Bridge, Marking the Site of George Washington’s First Presidential Mansion, Franklin House. (Credit: Hany Soliman) Historic Landmark, 1954 Reconstruction, and Two Cities Plaques. (1954 & Cities Credit: Michele N. Vulcan) 44 2006 BRIDGES AND TUNNELS ANNUAL CONDITION REPORT INNOVATIONS & ACCOMPLISHMENTS The fitting of the remaining bridge elements requiring seismic retrofitting will be carried out under a separate contract by the end of 2013. Work completed on the bridge to date includes reconditioning of the main cables, replacement of the suspenders and cable stays, rehabilitation of the stiffening trusses, and the replacement of the suspended spans deck. The next work scheduled for the bridge is a project to replace the existing travelers with a state of the art technology system.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation During and After Hurricane Sandy
    Transportation During and After Hurricane Sandy Sarah Kaufman, Carson Qing, Nolan Levenson and Melinda Hanson Rudin Center for Transportation NYU Wagner Graduate School of Public Service November 2012 1 Executive Summary Hurricane Sandy demonstrated the strengths and limits of the transportation infrastructure in New York City and the surrounding region. As a result of the timely and thorough preparations by New York City and the MTA, along with the actions of city residents and emergency workers to evacuate and adapt, the storm wrought far fewer casualties than might have occurred otherwise. The MTA and New York City Police Department, Departments of Transportation, Environmental Protection, and Sanitation worked quickly to pump water out of tunnels, repair infrastructure, enforce bus lanes, and clear debris. They also informed riders of service updates and the status of infrastructure, particularly with up-to-date maps, photos and videos provided by the MTA. The experience of Hurricane Sandy reinforced the importance of having multiple modes of transportation in the New York Region: subways, buses, bridges and tunnels, ferries as well as commuter rail systems in moving people in, through and out of the New York City and surrounding region. Hurricane Sandy also highlighted key investments and policies that should be considered to assure the viability of our infrastructure during future disasters: • Install backup power for subway pumps • Consider the use of porous pavement for streets in flood-prone areas • Locate building generators and fuel sources in flood prone areas on higher floors Hurricane Sandy and its impact on transportation also provided a timely message to all New Yorkers that public transportation is essential to the economic and social well being of the people who live, work and visit here.
    [Show full text]
  • The City Record 41/10
    THE CITY RECORD LXXIV NUMBER 22241 NEW YORK, SATURDAY, AUGUST 24, 1946 PRICE 10 CENTS Wilbrun, Inc., 215 Beach 116th st., Rocka- Division, $20 from Automobile Under- THE CITY RECORD way Park, N. Y., erect steel "Quonset No. writers Detective Bureau for recovery of 41/10 155 40" building, 40 feet by 60 feet, to be used an automobile. AUGUST 8 OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK as a store to sell merchandise 605 feet Ceased—Helen Pomykala, Police- Published Under Authority of Section 872-a of the New York City Charter east of the foot of Beach 116th st., and Services Beach Channel dr., Jamaica Bay. woman, Military Service Bureau, July 31. STEPHEN G. KELLEY, Surer/not United States Gypsum Co., 561 Richmond ARTHUR W. WALLANDER, Police WILLIAM VIERTEL, Enrroa ter., S. I., do maintenance dredging to 24 Commissioner. 2213 Municipal Building, Manhattan, N. Y. 7. WO rth 2.1800 feet below mean low water alongside of the wall at the foot of Lafayette ave., President, Borough of Brooklyn Published daily, at 9 a. m., except Sundays and legal holidays. Kill van Kull, Richmond. Subscription: $20 a year; $10 six months; $5 three months. Daily issue, Long Island Railroad Co., Room 343, Report for Week Ended Aug. 10, 1946 10 cents a copy (by mail, 15 cents). Pennsylvania Station, Manhattan, N. Y. 1, Division of Audit Entered as Second-Class Matter, Post Office at New York, N V Orders issued, 23; estimated cost $765.05. OTHER CITY RECORD PUBLICATIONS install three dry ice liquefiers for liquefac- tion of dry ice into carbonic gas at the Vouchers forwarded to Comptroller for Order must be accompanied b currency, money order, or check drawn ro the order of payment, 28; estimated cost, $2,712.54.
    [Show full text]
  • As Lower Manhattan Rebuilds, a New Map Takes Shape
    ID NAME: Nxxx,2004-07-04,A,024,Bs-BW,E2 3 7 15 25 50 75 85 93 97 24 Ø N THE NEW YORK TIMES METRO SUNDAY, JULY 4, 2004 CITY A Status Report: As Lower Manhattan Rebuilds, a New Map Takes Shape By DAVID W. DUNLAP and GLENN COLLINS Below are projects in and around ground DEVELOPMENT PLAN zero and where they stood as of Friday. Embassy Goldman Suites Hotel/ Sachs Bank of New York BUILDINGS UA Battery Park Building Technology and On the World Trade Center site City theater site 125 Operations Center PARKS GREENWICH ST. 75 Park Place Barclay St. 101 Barclay St. (A) FREEDOM TOWER / TOWER 1 2 MURRAY ST. Former site of 6 World Trade Center, the 6 United States Custom House 0Feet 200 Today, the cornerstone will be laid for this WEST BROADWAY skyscraper, with about 60,000 square feet of retail space at its base, followed by 2.6 mil- Fiterman Hall, lion square feet of office space on 70 stories, 9 Borough of topped by three stories including an obser- Verizon Building Manhattan PARK PL. vation deck and restaurants. Above the en- 4 World 140 West St. Community College closed portion will be an open-air structure Financial 3 5 with wind turbines and television antennas. Center 7 World The governor’s office is a prospective ten- VESEY ST. BRIDGE Trade Center 100 Church St. ant. Occupancy is expected in late 2008. The WASHINGTON ST. 7 cost of the tower, apart from the infrastruc- 3 World 8 BARCLAY ST. ture below, is estimated at $1 billion to $1.3 Financial Center billion.
    [Show full text]
  • Transforming the East River Waterfront the City of New York
    TRANSFORMING THE EAST RIVER WATERFRONT THE CITY OF NEW YORK MICHAEL R. BLOOMBERG DANIEL L. DOCTOROFF AMANDA M. BURDEN MAYOR DEPUTY MAYOR FOR DIRECTOR CITY OF NEW YORK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT & REBUILDING DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING THE CITY OF NEW YORK LETTER FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS INTRODUCTION 7 STUDY AREA GLOBAL WATERFRONT VISIONS DESIGN TEAM METHODOLOGY PUBLIC PROCESS STUDY AREA 13 HISTORICAL CONTEXT 45 YEARS OF PLANNING CURRENT HARBOR INITIATIVES WATERFRONT TYPES LOWER MANHATTAN INITIATIVES EXISTING CONDITIONS THE FOUNDATION PROJECTS 23 FOUNDATION PROJECT DESIGN PHILOSOPHY UNDERSTANDING NEEDS AND OPPORTUNITIES ACTIVITIES MAP ECOLOGY SUSTAINABLE DESIGN TRAFFIC PLAN OVERVIEW PROJECT INDEX THE ESPLANADE PROJECTS 39 THE ESPLANADE ESPLANADE COMPONENTS ESPLANADE WIDE ESPLANADE PAVILION PROGRAMS FDR DRIVE CLADDING THE PIER PROJECTS 47 THE PIERS PIER STRUCTURE TYPES PIER 15 NEW MARKET BUILDING PIER 35 THE SLIP PROJECTS 57 THE SLIPS BURLING SLIP PECK SLIP SLIP PROTOTYPE PIKE / ALLEN THE GATEWAY PROJECTS 69 THE GATEWAYS BATTERY MARITIME BUILDING PLAZA EAST RIVER PARK CONNECTION CONTRIBUTORS 77 CONTENT 4 East River Waterfront + The City of New York LETTER FROM DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING The Department of City Planning is proud to present this concept study of the completion of the Manhattan Greenway and graciously link the Battery to the East East River Waterfront in Lower Manhattan. With the generous support of the Lower River Park and beyond. Manhattan Development Corporation, the City was able to initiate a one-year planning study for this crucial component of the redevelopment of the Manhattan In the Acknowledgments Section of the report, we have attempted to include Waterfront.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary
    Executive Summary A. INTRODUCTION The New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT), in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), proposes to reconstruct a portion of Route 9A between Chambers and West Thames Streets in Lower Manhattan. This area is being considered for reconstruction as a result of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, that destroyed the World Trade Center (WTC) and severely damaged or destroyed additional nearby structures and transportation infrastructure including portions of Route 9A. The proposed project, which is being reviewed under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) as a supplement to the 1994 Route 9A Reconstruction Project Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS), is one of several federally funded Lower Manhattan recovery projects proposed in response to the devastation of September 11, 2001. As a transportation cornerstone in this recovery effort, the project is intended to provide a safe and efficient transportation facility that meets the goals and objectives established for Route 9A, prior to and since September 11, 2001. The proposed project takes into consideration the redevelopment efforts in Lower Manhattan; specifically, those at the WTC Site. These other initiatives have resulted in a new set of existing and future conditions, such as the WTC Memorial, which could not be foreseen in the 1994 FEIS. Therefore, while the project’s goals and objectives from the 1994 FEIS still apply, they have been updated and expanded to reflect this new set of conditions. B. PROJECT IDENTIFICATION / LOCATION Located near the Hudson River between Battery Place and 59th Street in Manhattan (see Figure S-1), Route 9A (also known as West Street) is a six- to eight-lane principal urban arterial with a continuous bikeway and walkway.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7: Social and Economic Conditions
    MTA New York City Transit Fulton Street Transit Center DEIS CHAPTER 7: SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS 7.1 OVERVIEW The Fulton Street Transit Center (FSTC) would be constructed within a vibrant retail, commercial and residential neighborhood in Lower Manhattan. Pursuant to Presidential Executive Order (EO) 13274 - Environmental Stewardship and Transportation Infrastructure Project Reviews, this chapter presents the potential impacts of construction and operation of the FSTC on the social and economic conditions in that neighborhood. These conditions include: land use, zoning and public policy; economic conditions such as employment opportunities and business activity; and, neighborhood character, including population, housing and recreation and cultural facility characteristics. Two (2) critical planning issues shaping the future of Lower Manhattan are the lack of regional transit connectivity; and the transformation of the area from a daytime commercial community to a 24-hour residential and commercial community. The events of September 11 had significant consequences for both these planning issues and have reinforced the importance of revitalization for Lower Manhattan. In addition to the assessment of the potential environmental impacts of the FSTC, this chapter also presents a summary of current revitalization policies and plans that are influencing transportation strategies, along with residential and economic development, within Lower Manhattan. The discussion of social and economic impacts evaluates potential impacts analyzed in other chapters of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), including traffic and transportation, noise and air quality, safety and indirect development impacts. The analysis evaluates both benefits and/or adverse impacts associated with the FSTC that may affect socioeconomic and community characteristics, either temporarily during construction, or permanently during operation.
    [Show full text]