DOCSLIB.ORG

Table of Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

STATE WILDLIFE ACTION PLAN July 31, 2015 GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES WILDLIFE RESOURCES DIVISION Table of Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................ iii Executive Summary ........................................................................................................... ix I. Introduction and Purpose ................................................................................................. 1 A Plan to Protect Georgia’s Biological Diversity ....................................................... 1 Essential Elements of a State Wildlife Action Plan .................................................... 2 Species of Greatest Conservation Need ...................................................................... 3 Scales of Biological Diversity .................................................................................... 4 Wildlife Diversity Databases ...................................................................................... 5 II. Approach and Methods .................................................................................................. 7 Organizational Structure ............................................................................................. 7 Public Involvement ..................................................................................................... 9 Coordination with Other Agencies and Organizations ............................................. 10 Coordination with Other Planning Efforts in Georgia .............................................. 13 Identification of Priorities, Problems and Actions .................................................... 14 Review and Revision ................................................................................................ 35 III. State Overview- Ecological Framework .................................................................... 37 Physiography............................................................................................................. 37 Geology ..................................................................................................................... 38 Climate ...................................................................................................................... 41 Ecoregions of the State ............................................................................................. 42 Patterns of Wildlife Diversity ................................................................................... 44 Species of Conservation Concern ............................................................................. 45 Land Use and Human Impacts .................................................................................. 46 IV. Conservation Landscape Assessments and Conservation Strategies.......................... 57 Southwestern Appalachians/Ridge & Valley ............................................................ 57 Blue Ridge Ecoregion ............................................................................................... 78 Piedmont Ecoregion .................................................................................................. 99 Southeastern Plains Ecoregion ................................................................................ 119 i Southern Coastal Plain Ecoregion .......................................................................... 148 V. Statewide Wildlife Conservation Themes and Strategies ......................................... 171 Climate Change ....................................................................................................... 171 Other Emerging Issues ............................................................................................ 182 Regional Conservation Partnerships ....................................................................... 192 Wildlife Conservation on Private Lands ................................................................. 198 Wildlife Conservation on Public Lands .................................................................. 201 Assessments of High Priority Habitats and Species ............................................... 202 Conservation of High Priority Habitats and Species .............................................. 203 Education, Outreach, and Communications ............................................................ 210 Increasing Capacity for Wildlife Conservation ...................................................... 212 Reducing Impacts from Development and Other Activities ................................... 214 Wildlife Laws and Regulations ............................................................................... 215 Monitoring and Adaptive Management .................................................................. 216 Public-Private Partnerships for Land Conservation ................................................ 218 VI. Procedures for SWAP Review and Revision........................................................... 220 Acronyms and Abbreviations Used in This Document .................................................. 221 References ....................................................................................................................... 225 Appendix A. High Priority Species and Habitats Summary Data Appendix B. Birds Technical Team Report Appendix C. Mammals Technical Team Report Appendix D. Reptiles and Amphibians Technical Team Report Appendix E. Fishes and Aquatic Invertebrates Technical Team Report Appendix F. Aquatic Habitat Technical Team Report Appendix G. Terrestrial Invertebrates Technical Team Report Appendix H. Plants Technical Team Report Appendix I. Habitat Restoration Technical Team Report Appendix J. Monitoring Technical Team Report Appendix K. Education Technical Team Report Appendix L. Communications and Outreach Technical Team Report Appendix M. Database Enhancements Technical Team Report Appendix N. Ecosystems/Habitat Mapping Technical Team Report Appendix O. Climate Change Adaptation Technical Team Report Appendix P. Priority Conservation Actions ii Acknowledgements A great many people provided input into the collective knowledge base that served as the foundation of this plan. The Advisory Committee members listed in Section II of this report lent critical support and guidance throughout the planning effort. In addition, we would like to thank the following individuals who served on or provided information to the State Wildlife Action Plan Technical Teams. (* = team leaders) Birds Todd Schneider*, WRD; Tim Keyes*, WRD; Jim Bates, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Rebecca Byrd, Georgia Department of Transportation; Larry Carlile, DOD./Ft. Stewart Military Reservation; Scott Coleman, Little St. Simons Island; Chris Coppola, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Dean Demarest, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Jenifer Hilburn, St. Catherines Island Foundation, Altamaha Riverkeeper; Malcolm Hodges, The Nature Conservancy; Elizabeth Hunter, University of Georgia; Nathan Klaus, WRD; Charlie Muise, Atlanta Audubon Society; Jim Ozier, WRD; Dr. John Parrish, Georgia Southern University; Carrie Straight, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Reggie Thackston, WRD; Dr. Jim Wentworth, USDA Forest Service; Troy Wilson, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Giff Beaton, Independent Ornithologist; Dr. Richard Chandler, University of Georgia; Dr. Bob Cooper, University of Georgia; Bob Sargent, Warner Robins Air Force Base/Georgia Ornithological Society; Terry Johnson, WRD; Jim Cox, Tall Timbers Research Station Mammals Jim Ozier*, WRD; Trina Morris*, WRD; Cecilia Ball, Habitat for Bats; Robert Ball, Habitat for Bats; Dr. Jackie Belwood, Georgia Highlands College; Dr. Michael Bender, Gordon State College; Dr. Brad Bergstrom, Valdosta State University; Bobby Bond, WRD; Chris Brookshire, Golder Associates, Inc.; Dottie Brown, Ecological Solutions, Inc.; Dr. Stephen Burnett, Clayton State University; Jim Candler, Georgia Power Company; Dr. Steven Castleberry, University of Georgia; Nikki Castleberry, University of Georgia; Dr. Mike Chamberlain, University of Georgia; Doug Chamblin, Georgia Department of Transportation; Laci Coleman, Eco-Tech Consultants; Dr. Michael Conner, Joseph W. Jones Ecological Research Center; Dr. Tara Cox, Savannah State University; Brian Davis, Georgia Department of Transportation; Ben Dickerson, Georgia Power Company; Lee Droppelman, Eco-Tech Consultants; Dr. Mark Ford, Virginia Tech; Dr. Greg Hartman, Gordon State College; Dennis Krusac, USDA Forest Service; Dr. Susan Loeb, Clemson University; Alton Owens, Eco-Tech Consultants; Dr. William Paschal, LaGrange College; Pete Pattavina, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Jimmy Rickard, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Kim Romano, Ecological Solutions, Inc.; Carol Ruckdeschel, Cumberland Island Museum; Dr. Jason Scott, Abraham Baldwin Agricultural College; Vicky B. Smith, A-Z Animals; Vanessa Terrell, University of Georgia; Dr. Doug Waid (ret), Abraham Baldwin Agricultural College; Greg Waters, WRD; Dr. Jim Wentworth, USDA Forest Service; Dr. Mark Yates, LaGrange College iii Reptiles and Amphibians John Jensen*, WRD; Dr. Kimberly Andrews, Georgia Sea Turtle Center; Dr. Bill Birkhead, Columbus State University; Dr. Carlos Camp, Piedmont College; Larry Carlile, DOD/Ft. Stewart Military Reservation; Nikki Castleberry, University of Georgia Museum of Natural History; Christopher Coppola, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Mark Dodd, WRD; Matt Elliott, WRD;
Recommended publications
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016

    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016

    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Revised February 24, 2017 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org C ur Alleghany rit Ashe Northampton Gates C uc Surry am k Stokes P d Rockingham Caswell Person Vance Warren a e P s n Hertford e qu Chowan r Granville q ot ui a Mountains Watauga Halifax m nk an Wilkes Yadkin s Mitchell Avery Forsyth Orange Guilford Franklin Bertie Alamance Durham Nash Yancey Alexander Madison Caldwell Davie Edgecombe Washington Tyrrell Iredell Martin Dare Burke Davidson Wake McDowell Randolph Chatham Wilson Buncombe Catawba Rowan Beaufort Haywood Pitt Swain Hyde Lee Lincoln Greene Rutherford Johnston Graham Henderson Jackson Cabarrus Montgomery Harnett Cleveland Wayne Polk Gaston Stanly Cherokee Macon Transylvania Lenoir Mecklenburg Moore Clay Pamlico Hoke Union d Cumberland Jones Anson on Sampson hm Duplin ic Craven Piedmont R nd tla Onslow Carteret co S Robeson Bladen Pender Sandhills Columbus New Hanover Tidewater Coastal Plain Brunswick THE COUNTIES AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF NORTH CAROLINA Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as new data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate.
  • Stream-Temperature Characteristics in Georgia

    Stream-Temperature Characteristics in Georgia

    STREAM-TEMPERATURE CHARACTERISTICS IN GEORGIA By T.R. Dyar and S.J. Alhadeff ______________________________________________________________________________ U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 96-4203 Prepared in cooperation with GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION Atlanta, Georgia 1997 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services 3039 Amwiler Road, Suite 130 Denver Federal Center Peachtree Business Center Box 25286 Atlanta, GA 30360-2824 Denver, CO 80225-0286 CONTENTS Page Abstract . 1 Introduction . 1 Purpose and scope . 2 Previous investigations. 2 Station-identification system . 3 Stream-temperature data . 3 Long-term stream-temperature characteristics. 6 Natural stream-temperature characteristics . 7 Regression analysis . 7 Harmonic mean coefficient . 7 Amplitude coefficient. 10 Phase coefficient . 13 Statewide harmonic equation . 13 Examples of estimating natural stream-temperature characteristics . 15 Panther Creek . 15 West Armuchee Creek . 15 Alcovy River . 18 Altamaha River . 18 Summary of stream-temperature characteristics by river basin . 19 Savannah River basin . 19 Ogeechee River basin. 25 Altamaha River basin. 25 Satilla-St Marys River basins. 26 Suwannee-Ochlockonee River basins . 27 Chattahoochee River basin. 27 Flint River basin. 28 Coosa River basin. 29 Tennessee River basin . 31 Selected references. 31 Tabular data . 33 Graphs showing harmonic stream-temperature curves of observed data and statewide harmonic equation for selected stations, figures 14-211 . 51 iii ILLUSTRATIONS Page Figure 1. Map showing locations of 198 periodic and 22 daily stream-temperature stations, major river basins, and physiographic provinces in Georgia.
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."

    "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."

    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
  • Lloyd Shoals

    Lloyd Shoals

    Southern Company Generation. 241 Ralph McGill Boulevard, NE BIN 10193 Atlanta, GA 30308-3374 404 506 7219 tel July 3, 2018 FERC Project No. 2336 Lloyd Shoals Project Notice of Intent to Relicense Lloyd Shoals Dam, Preliminary Application Document, Request for Designation under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act and Request for Authorization to Initiate Consultation under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act Ms. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20426 Dear Ms. Bose: On behalf of Georgia Power Company, Southern Company is filing this letter to indicate our intent to relicense the Lloyd Shoals Hydroelectric Project, FERC Project No. 2336 (Lloyd Shoals Project). We will file a complete application for a new license for Lloyd Shoals Project utilizing the Integrated Licensing Process (ILP) in accordance with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (Commission) regulations found at 18 CFR Part 5. The proposed Process, Plan and Schedule for the ILP proceeding is provided in Table 1 of the Preliminary Application Document included with this filing. We are also requesting through this filing designation as the Commission’s non-federal representative for consultation under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act and authorization to initiate consultation under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. There are four components to this filing: 1) Cover Letter (Public) 2) Notification of Intent (Public) 3) Preliminary Application Document (Public) 4) Preliminary Application Document – Appendix C (CEII) If you require further information, please contact me at 404.506.7219. Sincerely, Courtenay R.
  • Coastal Landscaping in Massachusetts Plant List

    Coastal Landscaping in Massachusetts Plant List

    Coastal Landscaping in Massachusetts Plant List This PDF document provides additional information to supplement the Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management (CZM) Coastal Landscaping website. The plants listed below are good choices for the rugged coastal conditions of Massachusetts. The Coastal Beach Plant List, Coastal Dune Plant List, and Coastal Bank Plant List give recommended species for each specified location (some species overlap because they thrive in various conditions). Photos and descriptions of selected species can be found on the following pages: • Grasses and Perennials • Shrubs and Groundcovers • Trees CZM recommends using native plants wherever possible. The vast majority of the plants listed below are native (which, for purposes of this fact sheet, means they occur naturally in eastern Massachusetts). Certain non-native species with specific coastal landscaping advantages that are not known to be invasive have also been listed. These plants are labeled “not native,” and their state or country of origin is provided. (See definitions for native plant species and non-native plant species at the end of this fact sheet.) Coastal Beach Plant List Plant List for Sheltered Intertidal Areas Sheltered intertidal areas (between the low-tide and high-tide line) of beach, marsh, and even rocky environments are home to particular plant species that can tolerate extreme fluctuations in water, salinity, and temperature. The following plants are appropriate for these conditions along the Massachusetts coast. Black Grass (Juncus gerardii) native Marsh Elder (Iva frutescens) native Saltmarsh Cordgrass (Spartina alterniflora) native Saltmeadow Cordgrass (Spartina patens) native Sea Lavender (Limonium carolinianum or nashii) native Spike Grass (Distichlis spicata) native Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) native Plant List for a Dry Beach Dry beach areas are home to plants that can tolerate wind, wind-blown sand, salt spray, and regular interaction with waves and flood waters.
  • List of TMDL Implementation Plans with Tmdls Organized by Basin

    List of TMDL Implementation Plans with Tmdls Organized by Basin

    Latest 305(b)/303(d) List of Streams List of Stream Reaches With TMDLs and TMDL Implementation Plans - Updated June 2011 Total Maximum Daily Loadings TMDL TMDL PLAN DELIST BASIN NAME HUC10 REACH NAME LOCATION VIOLATIONS TMDL YEAR TMDL PLAN YEAR YEAR Altamaha 0307010601 Bullard Creek ~0.25 mi u/s Altamaha Road to Altamaha River Bio(sediment) TMDL 2007 09/30/2009 Altamaha 0307010601 Cobb Creek Oconee Creek to Altamaha River DO TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010601 Cobb Creek Oconee Creek to Altamaha River FC 2012 Altamaha 0307010601 Milligan Creek Uvalda to Altamaha River DO TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 2006 Altamaha 0307010601 Milligan Creek Uvalda to Altamaha River FC TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010601 Oconee Creek Headwaters to Cobb Creek DO TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010601 Oconee Creek Headwaters to Cobb Creek FC TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010602 Ten Mile Creek Little Ten Mile Creek to Altamaha River Bio F 2012 Altamaha 0307010602 Ten Mile Creek Little Ten Mile Creek to Altamaha River DO TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010603 Beards Creek Spring Branch to Altamaha River Bio F 2012 Altamaha 0307010603 Five Mile Creek Headwaters to Altamaha River Bio(sediment) TMDL 2007 09/30/2009 Altamaha 0307010603 Goose Creek U/S Rd. S1922(Walton Griffis Rd.) to Little Goose Creek FC TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010603 Mushmelon Creek Headwaters to Delbos Bay Bio F 2012 Altamaha 0307010604 Altamaha River Confluence of Oconee and Ocmulgee Rivers to ITT Rayonier
  • Native Plants for Your Backyard

    Native Plants for Your Backyard

    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Native Plants for Your Backyard Native plants of the Southeastern United States are more diverse in number and kind than in most other countries, prized for their beauty worldwide. Our native plants are an integral part of a healthy ecosystem, providing the energy that sustains our forests and wildlife, including important pollinators and migratory birds. By “growing native” you can help support native wildlife. This helps sustain the natural connections that have developed between plants and animals over thousands of years. Consider turning your lawn into a native garden. You’ll help the local environment and often use less water and spend less time and money maintaining your yard if the plants are properly planted. The plants listed are appealing to many species of wildlife and will look attractive in your yard. To maximize your success with these plants, match the right plants with the right site conditions (soil, pH, sun, and moisture). Check out the resources on the back of this factsheet for assistance or contact your local extension office for soil testing and more information about these plants. Shrubs Trees Vines Wildflowers Grasses American beautyberry Serviceberry Trumpet creeper Bee balm Big bluestem Callicarpa americana Amelanchier arborea Campsis radicans Monarda didyma Andropogon gerardii Sweetshrub Redbud Carolina jasmine Fire pink Little bluestem Calycanthus floridus Cercis canadensis Gelsemium sempervirens Silene virginica Schizachyrium scoparium Blueberry Red buckeye Crossvine Cardinal flower
  • State of New York City's Plants 2018

    State of New York City's Plants 2018

    STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species.
  • The Mock-Oranges

    The Mock-Oranges

    ARNOLDIA A continuation of the BULLETIN OF POPULAR INFORMATION of the Arnold Arboretum, Harvard University VOLUME ~Jr JUNE 18, 1965 NUMBER5 THE MOCK-ORANGES are about fifty species and varieties of Philadelphus being grown in THERE-~- the commercial nurseries of the United States, so there is a wealth of ma- terial from which to select ornamental plants. The collection at the Arnold Arboretum contams over one hundred species and varieties. They all have white flowers, their fruits are dried capsules and not very interesting, and the autumn color is not especially outstanding, being yellow or yellowish. In other words, they are chiefly of value during the short period when they are in bloom; but they are all grown easily in almost any normal soil, and are mostly free from injurious insect and disease pests-reason enough why they have proved popular over the years. Some plants in this group have special merit. Philadelphus coronarius, for in- stance, is excellent for planting in dry soil situations. Many of the hybrids have extremely fragrant flowers, and some of the plants, like P. laxus and P. X splen- dens, have branches which face the ground well all around and make fairly good foliage specimens throughout the length of time they retain their leaves. On the other hand, the flowers of many of the species are not fragrant, and some plants, like Philadelphus delavayi and P. X monstrosus reach heights of fifteen feet or more; they are frequently just too tall and vigorous for the small garden. There are better shrubs of this height with mteresting flowers, better autumn color, and fruits in the fall (like some of the viburnums), so, if tall shrubs are desired, it is not the mock-oranges which should have first consideration.
  • Lafayette Creek Property—Phases I and Ii Umbrella

    Lafayette Creek Property—Phases I and Ii Umbrella

    LAFAYETTE CREEK PROPERTY—PHASES I AND II UMBRELLA REGIONAL MITIGATION PLANS FOR FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS CONCEPTUAL MITIGATION PLAN WALTON COUNTY, FLORIDA June 20, 2011 Prepared for: Mr. David Clayton Northwest Florida Water Management District 81 Water Management Drive Havana, FL 32333 Prepared by: ________________________________ ________________________________ Caitlin E. Elam Richard W. Cantrell Staff Scientist Senior Consultant 4240-034 Y100 Lafayette Creek Phases I and II Restoration Plan 062011_E.doc Lafayette Creek Property—Phases I and II Umbrella Regional Mitigation Plans for Florida Department of Transportation Projects June 20, 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW AND GOALS ............................................................................. 1 2.0 LOCATION AND LANDSCAPE ...................................................................................... 2 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ................................................................................................. 2 4.0 LISTED SPECIES ............................................................................................................ 13 5.0 EXOTIC SPECIES ............................................................................................................ 17 6.0 HISTORIC CONDITIONS ............................................................................................... 17 7.0 SOILS ...............................................................................................................................
  • Syringa Meyeri

    Syringa Meyeri

    Syringa meyeri - Meyer Lilac (Oleaceae) ------------------------------------------------------------------- Syringa meyeri is a compact but spreading, small- Fruits foliaged Lilac with showy, late May, lavender-purple -brown capsules on the winter persistent fruiting inflorescences. Meyer Lilac is especially urban stalks are not ornamental tolerant and without powdery mildew on its foliage. Twigs It is a Lilac that can be grown as a formal or informal -light brown to gray, with winter floral buds that are hedge. small, oval, and distinctly checkered (due to the differential color pattern on the overlapping floral FEATURES bud scales) Form -exhibiting dense twiggy branching on relatively thin -medium-sized ornamental shrub (or small branches (unlike all other Lilacs, which have ornamental tree, when grafted onto a moderate to sparse branching on medium to thick standard) branches) -species form slowly matures at Trunk about 6' tall x 8' wide -usually not applicable, unless the shrub has been -spreading oval growth habit (where grafted onto a standard (typically at about 4' in the oval shape is on its side) height) and becomes tree form -slow growth rate Culture USAGE -full sun to partial shade Function -performs best in full sun in moist, well-drained soils, -foundation, entranceway, border, group planting, but is urban tolerant and adaptable to poor soils, dry informal or formal hedge, or specimen shrub soils, compacted soils, soils of various pH, and Texture especially to heat and drought (but not adaptable to -medium-fine texture in
  • Rule 391-3-6-.03. Water Use Classifications and Water Quality Standards

    Rule 391-3-6-.03. Water Use Classifications and Water Quality Standards

    Presented below are water quality standards that are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. EPA is posting these standards as a convenience to users and has made a reasonable effort to assure their accuracy. Additionally, EPA has made a reasonable effort to identify parts of the standards that are not approved, disapproved, or are otherwise not in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. Rule 391-3-6-.03. Water Use Classifications and Water Quality Standards ( 1) Purpose. The establishment of water quality standards. (2) W ate r Quality Enhancement: (a) The purposes and intent of the State in establishing Water Quality Standards are to provide enhancement of water quality and prevention of pollution; to protect the public health or welfare in accordance with the public interest for drinking water supplies, conservation of fish, wildlife and other beneficial aquatic life, and agricultural, industrial, recreational, and other reasonable and necessary uses and to maintain and improve the biological integrity of the waters of the State. ( b) The following paragraphs describe the three tiers of the State's waters. (i) Tier 1 - Existing instream water uses and the level of water quality necessary to protect the existing uses shall be maintained and protected. (ii) Tier 2 - Where the quality of the waters exceed levels necessary to support propagation of fish, shellfish, and wildlife and recreation in and on the water, that quality shall be maintained and protected unless the division finds, after full satisfaction of the intergovernmental coordination and public participation provisions of the division's continuing planning process, that allowing lower water quality is necessary to accommodate important economic or social development in the area in which the waters are located.