DOCSLIB.ORG

Information to Users

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Ambiguous tribalism: Unrecognized Indians and the federal acknowledgement process Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Miller, Mark Edwin Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 10/10/2021 23:09:07 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/279824 INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly f^ the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may t)e from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy sulMnitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author dkl not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing firom left to right in equal sections with small overtaps. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9' black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrattons appearing in this copy for an additkmal charge. Contact UMI directly to order. ProQuest Informatnn and Learning 300 North Zeeb Road. Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 AMBIGUOUS TRIBAUSM: UNRECOGNIZED INDIANS AND THE FEDERAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT PROCESS By Mark Edwin Miller Copyright © Mark Edwin Miller 2001 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2001 UMI Number: 3023535 Ig) UMI UMI Microform 3023535 Copyright 2001 by Bell & Mowell Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. Bell & Howeii Information and Leaming Company 300 North Zeeb Road P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 2 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA ® GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Final Examination Committee, we certify that we have read the dissertation prepared by Mark Edwin Miller entitled AMBIGUOUS TRIBALISM; UNRECOGNIZED INDIANS AND THE FEDERAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT PROCESS and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Ci^ ^A- 7/17/01 Anderson/) 777 ^ Date Jogej^. Nichols Date Katharine Morrissey / Date Date Date Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent upon the candidate's submission of the final copy of the dissertation to the Graduate College. I hereby certify that I have read this dissertation prepared under my direction and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement. .(hJhAjJ^ 7/17/01 Dissertation Director Karen Anderson Date 3 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This dissertation has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this dissertation are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the copyright holder. SIGNED; 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many people and organizations have guided this project to its ultimate completion. Both in professional and personal terms, I could not have finished this work without the support of numerous individuals who lent much needed aid at key moments. First, I must thank my dissertation director Karen Anderson for her unwavering support, intellectual guidance, and periodic "pep talks." In her company were three other individuals who graciously agreed to serve on my committee: Katherine Momssey, who offered critical insights and suggestions to improve my prose and ideas; Roger Nichols, who has continued to aid my writing and focus; and David Wilkins, who offered enthusiastic support while bringing his expertise on acknowledgment issues to this project. Finally, Leonard Dinnerstein and Maureen Fitzgerald, also hold a special place in my heart, having seen the potential in me that others may have missed. This work also benefited from help given to me by numerous archivists, librarians, and philanthropic institutions. In Arizona, I must thank the librarians at the Special Collections at the University of Arizona Main Library, the Arizona Historical Society, the Arizona State Museum, Northern Arizona University, and the Hayden Library of Arizona State University. In California, the Death Valley National Park office allowed me access to its files. In Texas, Tom Diamond happily let me roam over his large collection, while the staffs at the University of Texas at El Paso, the LBJ Presidential Library, the Texas State Archives, and the Institute of Texan Cultures all helped me mine sources. The archivists at the Louisiana State University, the Louisiana State Library, and Northwest State University proved highly helpful as well. Access to the vast hol^ngs at the National Archives was also invaluable. I would also like to thank the Bureau of Indian Affairs' Branch of Acknowledgment and Research, and Steve Austin, in particular, for allowing me access to their records. They proved patient and helpful at dl stages of this work. Finally, this work benefited from the kind financial support of many institutions, including the American Historical Association's Littleton- Griswold fund, the Charles Redd Center for Western Studies at Brigham Young University, the Arizona Archaeological and Historical Society, the East Texas Historical Society, and the Udall fund from the University of Arizona Library. At the University of Arizona, my home department, the Social and Behavioral Sciences Research Institute, and the Graduate College all provided additional funds to support this work. Where would this project have been, however, without the help of family and friends through the years? To my wife Gia goes the ultimate thanks for sustaining me on a daily basis and listening to my complaints and ideas when her life was often much more difficult than mine. Thanks also goes to my mother, Penny Castle, for believing in my career choice and having constant enthusiasm about my work; and to my father, Charlie Miller and his wife Laurie, for their support through more years than any parent should see their children in school. Here in Tucson, Gia's parents, Dee and Bette, were always a positive presence in our lives. Finally, I must also thank Alan and Stacey Cotton for opening their home in Maryland to us longer than any friend should see a visitor stay. To the numerous individuals, both Indian and non-Indian, who shared their life experiences and insights with me goes another round of thanks. To my family and these kind souls goes the last, and final, thanks. 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT: 6 INTRODUCTION: OTHER AND IN-BETWEEN 8 CHAPTER I: THE HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF TRIBAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT POLICY, 1776-1978 54 CHAPTER 2: BUILDING AN EDIFICE: THE BIA'S FEDERAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT PROCESS (FAP), 1978-1999 116 CHAPTER 3: BYPASSING THE BUREAU: THE PASCUA YAQUIS' QUEST FOR LEGISLATIVE RECOGNITION 203 CHAPTER 4: SOMETIMES SALVATION: THE DEATH VALLEY TIMBISHA SHOSHONE OF CALIFORNIA AND THE FAP 302 CHAPTER 5: AMBIGUOUS TRIBALISM: THE UNITED HOUMA NATION OF LOUISIANA AND THE FAP, 1682-1930 374 CHAPTER 6: THE HOUMA AND MODERN TRIBALISM, 1930-PRESENT 427 CHAPTER 7: FROM PLAYING INDIAN TO PLAYING SLOTS: GAMING, TRIBAL RECOGNITION, AND THE TIGUAS OF EL PASO, TEXAS 492 CONCLUSION: THE OPPOSITE OF EXTINCTION 580 WORKS CITED: 597 6 ABSTRACT There are currently over two hundred Indian groups seeking recognition by Congress or the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA). Every month, articles appear detailing recently acknowledged tribes such as the Pequot opening high stakes gaming enterprises. This study examines several once unrecognized Indian conmiunities and their efforts to gain federal sanction through the BIA's Branch of Acknowledgment and Research or Congress. By focusing on four Indian communities, the Pascua Yaquis, the Timbisha Shoshone, the Tiguas of Ysleta del Sur Pueblo, and the United Houma Nation, this work explores the strategies groups pursue to gain acknowledgment and the different outcomes that result. In its details, the work reveals ethnic identity in relation to the state bureaucracy while also demonstrating that groups must "play Indian" to both Indians and non-Indians to prove their racial and cultural identity. The case studies examine ethnic resurgence and cultural survival, the effects of the civil rights movement and Great Society social programs on these entities, and the historical impact of non-recognition on groups in several regions of the United States. This study also takes a broader look
Recommended publications
  • Women's History Is Everywhere: 10 Ideas for Celebrating in Communities

    Women's History Is Everywhere: 10 Ideas for Celebrating in Communities

    Women’s History is Everywhere: 10 Ideas for Celebrating In Communities A How-To Community Handbook Prepared by The President’s Commission on the Celebration of Women in American History “Just think of the ideas, the inventions, the social movements that have so dramatically altered our society. Now, many of those movements and ideas we can trace to our own founding, our founding documents: the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. And we can then follow those ideas as they move toward Seneca Falls, where 150 years ago, women struggled to articulate what their rights should be. From women’s struggle to gain the right to vote to gaining the access that we needed in the halls of academia, to pursuing the jobs and business opportunities we were qualified for, to competing on the field of sports, we have seen many breathtaking changes. Whether we know the names of the women who have done these acts because they stand in history, or we see them in the television or the newspaper coverage, we know that for everyone whose name we know there are countless women who are engaged every day in the ordinary, but remarkable, acts of citizenship.” —- Hillary Rodham Clinton, March 15, 1999 Women’s History is Everywhere: 10 Ideas for Celebrating In Communities A How-To Community Handbook prepared by the President’s Commission on the Celebration of Women in American History Commission Co-Chairs: Ann Lewis and Beth Newburger Commission Members: Dr. Johnnetta B. Cole, J. Michael Cook, Dr. Barbara Goldsmith, LaDonna Harris, Gloria Johnson, Dr. Elaine Kim, Dr.
  • Resolving Native American Land Claims and the Eleventh Amendment: Changing the Balance of Power

    Resolving Native American Land Claims and the Eleventh Amendment: Changing the Balance of Power

    Volume 39 Issue 3 Article 1 1994 Resolving Native American Land Claims and the Eleventh Amendment: Changing the Balance of Power Katharine F. Nelson Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/vlr Part of the Constitutional Law Commons Recommended Citation Katharine F. Nelson, Resolving Native American Land Claims and the Eleventh Amendment: Changing the Balance of Power, 39 Vill. L. Rev. 525 (1994). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/vlr/vol39/iss3/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Villanova Law Review by an authorized editor of Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. Nelson: Resolving Native American Land Claims and the Eleventh Amendment: VILLANOVA LAW REVIEW VOLUME 39 1994 NUMBER 3 RESOLVING NATIVE AMERICAN LAND CLAIMS AND THE ELEVENTH AMENDMENT: CHANGING THE BALANCE OF POWER KATHARINE F. NELSON* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ........................................... 526 II. INDIAN TITLE AND THE NONINTERCOURSE ACT ........... 530 III. THE HISTORY OF TRIBAL ACCESS TO THE FEDERAL COURTS ................................................... 533 A. Before Oneida I and II. ....................... 533 B. O neida I .......................................... 542 C. O neida II ......................................... 543 IV. NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENTS ............................... 546 A. Land Claims ......................................
  • The Systematic Identification and Articulation of Content Standards and Benchmarks. Update. INSTITUTION Mid-Continent Regional Educational Lab., Aurora, CO

    The Systematic Identification and Articulation of Content Standards and Benchmarks. Update. INSTITUTION Mid-Continent Regional Educational Lab., Aurora, CO

    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 403 308 TM 026 040 AUTHOR Kendall, John S.; Marzano, Robert J. TITLE The Systematic Identification and Articulation of Content Standards and Benchmarks. Update. INSTITUTION Mid-Continent Regional Educational Lab., Aurora, CO. SPONS AGENCY Office of Educational Research and Improvement (ED), Washington, DC. PUB DATE Mar 95 CONTRACT RP91002005 NOTE 598p. AVAILABLE FROM Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. PUB TYPE Legal/Legislative/Regulatory Materials (090) Reports Descriptive (141) EDRS PRICE MF03/PC24 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Art; *Course Content; *Educational Improvement; Elementary Secondary Education; Geography Instruction; Health Education; History Instruction; *Identification; Language Arts; Mathematics Education; Science Education; *Standards; Thinking Skills IDENTIFIERS *Benchmarking; *Subject Content Knowledge ABSTRACT The project described in this paper addresses the major issues surrounding content standards, provides a model for their identification, and applies this model to identify standards and benchmarks in subject areas. This update includes a revision of content standards and benchmarks published in, earlier updates and the synthesis and identification of standards in new areas. Standards and benchmarks are provided for science, mathematics, history, geography, the arts, the language arts, and health. Also included are standards in thinking and reasoning and an analysis and description of knowledge and skills considered important for the workplace. Following an introduction, the second section presents an overview of the current efforts towards standards in each of these subject areas. Section 3 describes the technical and conceptual differences that have been apparent in the standards movement and the model adopted for this study. Section 4 presents key questions that should be addressed by schools and districts interested in a standards-based strategy.
  • CVNA History1.Pdf

    CVNA History1.Pdf

    Historical Overview Summary The Catalina Vista Historic District is located in close proximity to the University of Arizona in Tucson. The district is located north and east of the University's main campus and directly east of its medical school. Catalina Vista takes its name from a single subdivision, first developed in 1940. The Catalina Vista Historic District is considered significant under National Register criterion "A" for is association with community development in Tucson. Community development significance is described by the historic context "Tucson Subdivisions in Transition, 1940-1955 ." The historic district is also considered significant under National Register criterion "C" as being representative of architectural styles dominant in Tucson during World War Two and.the post-WWII transitional era. Architectural significance is described by the historic context "Tucson Architectural Styles in Transition, 1940-1955," Although the transitional era of community and architectural development took place from 1940 to 1955, the period of significance for the Historic District starts in 1903 when suburban residential development first began in district area and ends in 1951 at the fifty-year limit for National Register significance. This period of significance allows for the inclusion of the "Potter Place" property under the historical context "Residential Subdivision Development in Tucson, 1903- 1940 ." The Catalina Vista neighborhood, of Tucson is located in' Section 5 of Township 14 South, Range 14 East, of the Crila and- Salt River Base and Meridian in Arizona. Section 5 originally consisted of four separate parcels of land granted by the US government . Calvert Wilson received the first of these grants, taking possession by cash payment of about 160 acres in the northwest corner of the section in 1891 .
  • The Maine Indian Land Claim Settlement: a Personal Recollection

    The Maine Indian Land Claim Settlement: a Personal Recollection

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Maine Maine History Volume 46 Number 2 Land and Labor Article 5 6-1-2012 The Maine Indian Land Claim Settlement: A Personal Recollection John M.R. Paterson Bernstein, Shur Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/mainehistoryjournal Part of the Cultural Heritage Law Commons, Cultural History Commons, Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons, Indigenous Studies Commons, Legal Commons, Natural Resources Law Commons, Social History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Paterson, John M.. "The Maine Indian Land Claim Settlement: A Personal Recollection." Maine History 46, 2 (2012): 195-225. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/mainehistoryjournal/vol46/iss2/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maine History by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE MAINE INDIAN LAND CLAIM SETTLEMENT: A PERSONAL RECOLLECTION BY JOHN M.R. PATERSON From 1971 to 1980, the state of Maine grappled with one of the greatest legal challenges ever before it. That challenge had its origin in a suit brought by the Penobscot and Passamaquoddy tribes against the U.S. Department of the Interior seeking the seemingly simple declaration that the department owed a fiduciary duty to the tribes based on a federal law adopted in 1790. That suit was eventually to lead to a suit by the U.S. Department of Justice against the state of Maine, and potentially 350,000 residents in the eastern two-thirds of the state, seeking return of land taken from the tribes in the latter part of the eighteenth century and first part of the nineteenth century.
  • French and Indian War Causes Territorial Disputes European

    French and Indian War Causes Territorial Disputes European

    French and Indian War Causes Territorial Disputes European Conflicts Access to North American Resources Mercantilist Trade Native American Conflicts Strategies Control of Great Lakes Indian Alliances Naval Warfare Frontier Raids and Warfare Creation and Defense of Forts Albany Plan of Union – Failed British / Colonial Advantages Control of Eastern Seaboard Larger Population and Military Force Stronger Navy Disadvantages French Indian Alliance Conflicts Between Colonial and British Troops Outcomes Boost to Colonial Confidence Wrong Idea of Colonists by British Treaty of Paris 1763 End of Salutary Neglect End of French Menace on the Continent Proclamation Act of 1763 British Need for Revenue Pontiac’s Rebellion Expansion of British Territory Training of Colonial Leaders Revolutionary War Causes Taxation Representation Enlightenment Thinking Boston Massacre Intolerable Acts Trade Restrictions Strategies Defensive War Guerrilla Warfare Gain Alliances Colonial / United States Advantages Home Turf Time French Alliance “Cause” with Declaration of Independence Leadership of George Washington Disadvantages Weakness of Continental Army Lack of Money Inflation of Continental Script No Formal Military Training Outcomes Treaty of Paris 1783 Independence Land East of Mississippi, North of Florida, South of Great Lakes Fishing Rights British Military Out of United States Territory US Payment of Debts to British Merchants Ratification of Articles of Confederation 1781 Debt and Inflation Lack of Resolution British Forts Along Canadian Border Return of
  • United States Department of the Interior OFFICE of the SOLICITOR Washington, D.C

    United States Department of the Interior OFFICE of the SOLICITOR Washington, D.C

    United States Department of the Interior OFFICE OF THE SOLICITOR washington, D.C. 20240 I'IAY 0 1 2020 Memorandum To: Tara Sweeney, Assistant Secretary Indian Alfairs From: Kyle Scherer, Deputy Solicitor for lndian Xtats ,7 9,-Z-."-- Eric Shepard, Associate Solicitor, Division of Indian Affairs Arr> //. Shfa"/ Subj ect: Federal Jurisdiction Status ofSan Pasqual Band ofDiegueno Mission Indians of Califomia in 1934 This Opinion addresses the statutory authority ofthe Secretary ofthe Interior ("Secretary") to acquire land in trust for the San Pasqual Band of Diegueno Mission lndians of Califomia ("San Pasqual" or "Tribe") pursuant to Section 5 ofthe Iadian Reorganization Act of 1934 ("In 4'1.t Section 5 ofthe IRA ("Section 5") authorizes the Secretary to acquire land in trust for "Indians." Section 19 of the Act ("Section 19") defines "Indian" to include several categories ofpersons.2 As relevant here, the first definition inchrdes all persons of Indian descent who are members of "any recognized Indian tribe now under federal jurisdiction" ("Category 1").3 In 2009, the United States Supreme Court ("Supreme Court") in Carcieri v. Salazar constnted the term 1 "now" in Category 1 to refer to 1934, the year of the IRA's enactment. The Supreme Court did not consider the meaning ofthe phrases "under federal junsdiction" or "recognized Indian tribe." ln connection with the Tribe's pending fee-to-trust application.5 you have asked whether the Tribe is eligible for trust land acquisitions under Category 1.6 For the reasons explained below, we conclude that there is evidence presumptively demonstrating that the Tribe was "under '1934.
  • The Economic and Political Effects of the 1807-1809 Embargo on Virginia

    The Economic and Political Effects of the 1807-1809 Embargo on Virginia

    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1995 Virginia Embargoed: The Economic and Political Effects of the 1807-1809 Embargo on Virginia John George Kinzie College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Economic History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Kinzie, John George, "Virginia Embargoed: The Economic and Political Effects of the 1807-1809 Embargo on Virginia" (1995). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539626002. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-e608-9b15 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VIRGINIA EMBARGOED: THE ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL EFFECTS OF THE 1807-1809 EMBARGO ON VIRGINIA A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by John Kinzie 1995 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Arts in Kinzie Approved, May 1995 CMndos Brown John Selbj L a j ^ L Aa a ± x LA/\ Carol Sheriff “ J TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iv ABSTRACT v CHAPTER I. PRELUDE TO THE EMBARGO 2 CHAPTER II. THE EMBARGO BEGINS 20 CHAPTER HI. THE MANUFACTURING SPIRIT 37 CHAPTER IV.
  • The Reports of Our Death Are Greatly Exaggerated - Reflections on the Resilience of the Oneida Indian Nation of New York

    The Reports of Our Death Are Greatly Exaggerated - Reflections on the Resilience of the Oneida Indian Nation of New York

    BYU Law Review Volume 2018 Issue 6 Article 5 Spring 5-1-2019 The Reports of Our Death Are Greatly Exaggerated - Reflections on the Resilience of the Oneida Indian Nation of New York Allison M. Dussias Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Allison M. Dussias, The Reports of Our Death Are Greatly Exaggerated - Reflections on the Resilience of the Oneida Indian Nation of New York, 2018 BYU L. Rev. 1231 (2019). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview/vol2018/iss6/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Brigham Young University Law Review at BYU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in BYU Law Review by an authorized editor of BYU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 002.DUSSIAS_FIN2_NOHEADERS.DOCX (DO NOT DELETE) 5/6/19 2:18 PM The Reports of Our Death Are Greatly Exaggerated— Reflections on the Resilience of the Oneida Indian Nation of New York Allison M. Dussias* CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................ 1232 II. PRELIMINARY MATTERS: DEFINING RESILIENCE, FOCUSING ON THE NATION .................................................................................... 1235 A. Defining Resilience ............................................................................. 1235 B. Focusing on the Oneida Indian Nation of New York........................ 1236 III. ONEIDA RESILIENCE IN THE FACE OF DISPOSSESSION OF LAND, DENIAL OF EXISTENCE, AND DENIGRATION OF SOVEREIGNTY .......................... 1238 A. “We Want Your Land—and We Are Willing to Break the Law to Get It. What’s Yours Is Ours.” ........................................................ 1239 1. The Oneida Nation: America’s “first ally” ................................. 1239 2. After the war was over: National treaty guarantees, state expropriation ..................................................................
  • 1977 Native American Rights Fund '

    1977 Native American Rights Fund '

    Nationai India 1522 Broad~ nlaw Library Boufrfer ay ,0 ' co 803()2 Native American Rights Fund ' Annual Report • 1977 NATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND ' STEERING COMMITTEE Executive Committee David Aisling, Jr. (Hoopa), Chairman Coordinator, Native American Studies, University of California-Davis California • Val Cordova (Taos Pueblo)* Educator, San Felipe Day School New Mexico Leo Laclair (Muckleshoot) Attorney, Commercial Fisherman Washington LaNada Boyer (Shoshone-Bannock) • Tribal Council Member Idaho Committee Members Robert Bojorcas (Klamath) Director of CETA Manpower Program Oregon Chief Curtis L. Custalow, Sr. (Mattaponi) Mattaponi Chief Virginia Lucille Dawson (Narragansett) Program Specialist, Administration for Native Americans Washington D.C. Renee Howell (Oglala Sioux) • Paralegal South Dakota Louis LaRose (Winnebago) Chairman, Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska Nebraska Leroy Logan (Osage) Rancher Oklahoma Janet McCloud (Tulalip) Washington Jerry Running Foxe (Coquille) Chairman of Coquille Tribe Oregon • John Stevens (Passamaquoddy) Governor of the Passamaquoddy Tribe Maine · *Until October, 1977 CORPORATE OFFICERS Executive Director John E. Echohawk (Pawnee) Secretary Lorraine P. Edmo (Shoshone-Bannock) Treasurer James A. Laurie STAFF ATTORNEYS* Lawrence A. Aschenbrenner Kurt V. Blue Dog (Sisseton-Wahpeton Sioux) Richard B. Collins Raymond Cross (Mandan-Gros Ventre) Sharon K. Eads (Cherokee) Walter R. Echo-Hawk (Pawnee) Daniel H. Israel Yvonne T. Knight (Ponca-Creek) Timothy A. LaFrance (Turtle Mountain Chippewa) Arlinda F. Locklear (Lumbee) Don B. Miller Dennis M. Montgomery Robert S. Pelcyger Thomas N. Tureen A. John Wabaunsee (Prairie Band Potawatomi) Jeanne S. Whiteing (Blackf~et-Cahuilla) *as of December 31, 1977 Main Office: 1506 Broadway, Boulder, Colorado 80302 Branch Offices: Washington, p.C. and Calais, Maine DIRECTOR'S REPORT 1 THE PROGRAM 3 Purpose and Development .
  • Can Indian Tribes Sell Or Encumber Their Fee Lands Without Federal Approval?

    Can Indian Tribes Sell Or Encumber Their Fee Lands Without Federal Approval?

    Can Indian Tribes Sell or Encumber Their Fee Lands Without Federal Approval? Mark A. Jarboe and Daniel B. Watts1 “This Court has never determined whether the Indian Nonintercourse Act, which was enacted in 1834, applies to land that has been rendered alienable by Congress and later reacquired by an Indian tribe.”2 I. The Issue A few years ago, an Indian tribe in the Pacific Northwest desired to purchase a hotel located on a parcel of land owned in fee by a non-Indian party and to finance the acquisition with a bank loan. The bank was willing to make the loan on terms acceptable to the tribe, including a requirement that the loan be secured by a mortgage on the hotel and site. The structuring and documentation of the loan overcame the normal hurdles and challenges until it hit an unforeseen obstacle: Could the tribe legally grant the required mortgage to the bank? What caused the concern was one of the oldest federal statutes still in effect: 25 U.S.C. §177, referred to as the “Indian Nonintercourse Act” (the “INIA” or the “Act”). The INIA states: No purchase, grant, lease, or other conveyance of lands, or of any title or claim thereto, from any Indian nation or tribe of Indians, shall be of any validity in law or equity, unless the same be made by treaty or convention entered into pursuant to the Constitution. Every person who, not being employed under the authority of the United States, attempts to negotiate such treaty or convention, directly or indirectly, or to treat with any such nation or tribe of Indians for the title or purchase of any lands by them held or claimed, is liable to a penalty of $1,000.
  • United States V. State of Washington, 384 F

    United States V. State of Washington, 384 F

    FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; No. 13-35474 SUQUAMISH INDIAN TRIBE; SAUK-SUIATTLE TRIBE; D.C. Nos. STILLAGUAMISH TRIBE; HOH 2:01-sp-00001-RSM TRIBE; JAMESTOWN S’KLALLAM 2:70-cv-09213-RSM TRIBE; LOWER ELWHA BAND OF KLALLAMS; PORT GAMBLE BAND CLALLAM; NISQUALLY OPINION INDIAN TRIBE; NOOKSACK INDIAN TRIBE; SKOKOMISH INDIAN TRIBE; SQUAXIN ISLAND TRIBE; UPPER SKAGIT INDIAN TRIBE; TULALIP TRIBES; LUMMI INDIAN NATION; QUINAULT INDIAN NATION; SUQUAMISH INDIAN TRIBE; PUYALLUP TRIBE; CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF THE YAKAMA INDIAN NATION; QUILEUTE INDIAN TRIBE; MAKAH INDIAN TRIBE; SWINOMISH INDIAN TRIBAL COMMUNITY; MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. STATE OF WASHINGTON, Defendant-Appellant. 2 UNITED STATES V. WASHINGTON Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Ricardo S. Martinez, Chief District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted October 16, 2015 Seattle, Washington Filed June 27, 2016 Before: William A. Fletcher and Ronald M. Gould, Circuit Judges, and David A. Ezra,* District Judge. Opinion by Judge W. Fletcher * The Honorable David A. Ezra, District Judge for the U.S. District Court for the District of Hawai’i, sitting by designation. UNITED STATES V. WASHINGTON 3 SUMMARY** Tribal Fishing Rights The panel affirmed the district court’s order issuing an injunction directing the State of Washington to correct culverts, which allow streams to flow underneath roads, because they violated, and continued to violate, the Stevens Treaties, which were entered in 1854–55 between Indian tribes in the Pacific Northwest and the Governor of Washington Territory. As part of the Treaties, the Tribes relinquished large swaths of land, watersheds, and offshore waters adjacent to those areas (collectively, the “Case Area”), in what is now the State of Washington.