DOCSLIB.ORG

An Update on Analyzing Differences Between Public and Private Sector Information Resource Management: Strategic Information Challenges and Critical Technologies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Update on Analyzing Differences Between Public and Private Sector Information Resource Management: Strategic Information Challenges and Critical Technologies Air Force Institute of Technology AFIT Scholar Theses and Dissertations Student Graduate Works 6-2004 An Update on Analyzing Differences Between Public and Private Sector Information Resource Management: Strategic Information Challenges and Critical Technologies James R. Orlovsky Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.afit.edu/etd Part of the Management Information Systems Commons Recommended Citation Orlovsky, James R., "An Update on Analyzing Differences Between Public and Private Sector Information Resource Management: Strategic Information Challenges and Critical Technologies" (2004). Theses and Dissertations. 4097. https://scholar.afit.edu/etd/4097 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Graduate Works at AFIT Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of AFIT Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AN UPDATE ON ANALYZING DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR INFORMATION RESOURCE MANAGEMENT: STRATEGIC INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGES AND CRITICAL TECHNOLOGIES THESIS James R. Orlovsky, Master Sergeant, USMC AFIT/GIR/ENV/04M-17 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR UNIVERSITY AIR FORCE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED. The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the United States Marine Corps, United States Air Force, Department of Defense, or the United States Government. AFIT/GIR/ENV/04M-17 AN UPDATE ON ANALYZING DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR INFORMATION RESOURCE MANAGEMENT: STRATEGIC INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGES AND CRITICAL TECHNOLOGIES THESIS Presented to the Faculty Department of Systems and Engineering Management Graduate School of Engineering and Management Air Force Institute of Technology Air University Air Education and Training Command In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Information Resource Management James R. Orlovsky, BA Master Sergeant, USMC June 2004 APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED AFIT/GIR/ENV/04M-17 AN UPDATE ON ANALYZING DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR INFORMATION RESOURCE MANAGEMENT: STRATEGIC INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGES AND CRITICAL TECHNOLOGIES James R. Orlovsky, BA Master Sergeant, USMC Approved: _________________________________ ________________ Alan R. Heminger, PhD (Chairman) date _________________________________ ________________ Kevin L. Elder, PhD (Member) date _________________________________ ________________ Capt David D. Bouvin, PhD (Member) date AFIT/GIR/ENV/04M-17 Abstract Change is a constant within our contemporary IRM environment. The rapid development of information and communication technologies has been the most predominant among the many agents of change that are forcing a reevaluation of the role of the IRM professional. Few studies to date have compared public and private sector CIO perceptions concerning the IRM challenges and critical technologies faced by their organization. An earlier study concluded that the sectors’ CIOs do perceive to be faced with many of the same challenges and also view many of the same technologies as critical to the organization’s operations. A limiting factor identified in that study was the temporal separation of sector sampling. Any conclusions comparing the public and private sectors were based on survey responses separated by almost one year. The goal of this research is to validate if public and private sector senior IRM managers perceive to still be faced with the same challenges and view the same technologies as being critical to an organization’s IRM requirements. The results of a 2002 annual survey of public sector CIOs and senior IRM managers are compared with data collected from 2002 private sector CIOs. This research concluded that performing an analysis on datasets obtained from both sectors during the same time period provided a more appropriate comparison between sectors. Findings from this study provide sufficient evidence that both sectors have developed a closer correlation than was previously concluded. iv AFIT/GIR/ENV/04M-17 In memory of my Father. Rest in peace Dad. v Acknowledgements I would like to express my sincere appreciation to my faculty advisor, Dr. Alan Heminger, for his guidance, patience, and support throughout the course of this thesis effort. You are wise beyond your years. I would also like to thank LtCol Summer Bartczak, for her flawless leadership and fortitude. Your periods of classroom instruction were some of the most stimulating I have had the pleasure to witness. Special thanks go to Dr. Kevin Elder and Capt David Bouvin, readers of this research effort. The future of AFIT’s GIR program is well in hand with superb individuals such as these men. To my fellow AFIT Marine pioneers—thanks for your support and help. It was an honor to serve with you all. Thank you to my wife and best friend, for your patience and understand once again vi Table of Contents Page Abstract.............................................................................................................................. iv List of Figures.................................................................................................................... ix List of Tables ...................................................................................................................... x I. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 Overview........................................................................................................................1 Background .................................................................................................................... 3 Problem Statement ......................................................................................................... 5 Research Focus .............................................................................................................. 6 Thesis Overview ............................................................................................................ 7 II. Literature Review...........................................................................................................9 Overview........................................................................................................................9 Underlying Differences in Public and Private Sectors................................................. 11 The Generic Approach ................................................................................................. 12 The Core Approach...................................................................................................... 13 The Dimensional Approach ......................................................................................... 15 Public Versus Private Sector Management Information Systems................................ 17 Examining Differences Between Public and Private Information Management Practices ....................................................................................................................... 20 Competition and Perceived Importance of Information Systems ................................ 24 The Chief Information Officer..................................................................................... 29 CIO Best Practices ....................................................................................................... 31 CIO Challenges ............................................................................................................ 35 Research Focus ............................................................................................................ 40 Summary ...................................................................................................................... 41 III. Methodology............................................................................................................... 43 Overview...................................................................................................................... 43 Approach...................................................................................................................... 44 Research Approval....................................................................................................... 45 Population .................................................................................................................... 45 Survey Instrument ........................................................................................................ 46 Data Collection Method ............................................................................................... 51 Pilot Study.................................................................................................................... 51 Survey Modification..................................................................................................... 51 Survey Administration ................................................................................................. 55 vii Page Data Analysis ............................................................................................................... 55 Spearman’s Rho Correlation.......................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SPECIAL ISSUES and CAMPAIGNS Internally Displaced Family in Sierra Leone
    HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH WORLD REPORT 2002 SPECIAL ISSUES AND CAMPAIGNS Internally displaced family in Sierra Leone. © 1999 CORINNE DUFKA / HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH ACADEMIC FREEDOM xtremism thrived in countries where assaults on academic freedom fos- Etered a climate of ignorance and intolerance.In Afghanistan,the ruling Tal- iban’s first actions were to shut down most higher education and ban women and girls from attending school. But in less extreme forms, governments around the world justified violations of human rights by casting all critical thought as an attack on public morality, national security, or cultural purity. In the wake of the attacks on New York City and Washington, several academics in the United States and Canada came under official or public pressure for questioning various aspects of their governments’ past or projected policies. With another international conflict simmering, violations of academic freedom were likely to increase around the globe. Even before September 11, 2001, academic groups were growing increasingly aware of the importance of international cooperation and coordination in support of their colleagues’ freedom. The international Network on Education and Acade- mic Rights (NEAR) was created in June 2001 to serve as a repository and clearing- house for information about academic freedom cases. With initial funding from UNESCO, the network promised to expand on the existing contact and coopera- tion between academics and academic groups. As the network’s name indicated, NEAR’s understanding of academic freedom embraced not just the civil and polit- ical rights of scholars and their students, but also the social, economic, and cultural rights associated with the fundamental human right to education.
    [Show full text]
  • Contracting in Complex Operations: Toward Developing a Contracting Framework for Security Sector Reconstruction and Reform
    SYR-CM-14-185 Contracting in Complex Operations: Toward Developing a Contracting Framework for Security Sector Reconstruction and Reform Final Technical Report: Naval Postgraduate School Acquisition Research Program Grant No. N00244-13-1-0021 Nicholas J. Armstrong, Ph.D. David M. Van Slyke, Ph.D. Syracuse University Abstract Scholarship on private military and security companies largely focuses on their regulation and oversight as security and reconstruction service providers. It gives scant attention, however, to their role as institutional reformers, advisors, and trainers. This report presents findings of an in- depth case study on the challenges of procuring advising and training services in Afghanistan. The study is grounded in the analysis of 77 confidential, semi-structured interviews with elite and mid- level officials embedded within the Afghan defense and interior ministries, national army, and national and local polices forces and further supported by 261 Afghanistan training and advising contract documents obtained via Freedom of Information Act request. We evaluate an existing contracting framework for the purchase and integration of complex products with this data and find that rules, relationship strategies, governance mechanisms, and mutual understanding are critical in security sector reform (SSR) training and advising contracts. However, reliance on the private sector to provide these services will likely remain high, thus, a sharper focus is necessary on mutually beneficial outcomes that retain flexibility and accountability over the long run. To achieve these outcomes, greater attention is needed to hiring the right people, contract design must balance requirements specificity with flexibility, and contract management activities must seek to bridge gaps among the critical actors involved with respect to roles, responsibilities, and critical capabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Case Log October 2000 - April 2002
    Description of document: Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Case Log October 2000 - April 2002 Requested date: 2002 Release date: 2003 Posted date: 08-February-2021 Source of document: Information and Privacy Coordinator Central Intelligence Agency Washington, DC 20505 Fax: 703-613-3007 Filing a FOIA Records Request Online The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is a First Amendment free speech web site and is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website. 1 O ct 2000_30 April 2002 Creation Date Requester Last Name Case Subject 36802.28679 STRANEY TECHNOLOGICAL GROWTH OF INDIA; HONG KONG; CHINA AND WTO 36802.2992 CRAWFORD EIGHT DIFFERENT REQUESTS FOR REPORTS REGARDING CIA EMPLOYEES OR AGENTS 36802.43927 MONTAN EDWARD GRADY PARTIN 36802.44378 TAVAKOLI-NOURI STEPHEN FLACK GUNTHER 36810.54721 BISHOP SCIENCE OF IDENTITY FOUNDATION 36810.55028 KHEMANEY TI LEAF PRODUCTIONS, LTD.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B Wwns Case Shows Racial Discrimination Is Alive and Well
    National Black Church Initiative P.O. Box 65177 Washington, DC 20035 202­744­0184 [email protected] www.naltblackchurch.com January 4, 2011 Steve Feinberg Chief Executive Officer Cerberus Capital Management, L.P. 299 Park Avenue New York, NY 10171 Dan Quayle Chairman Cerberus Global Investments, LLC 299 Park Avenue – 22nd Fl New York, NY 10171 John W. Snow Chairman Cerberus Capital Management, L.P. 299 Park Avenue – 22nd Fl New York, NY 10171 Steven F. Gaffney Chairman and CEO DynCorp International 3190 Fairview Park Drive, Suite 700 Falls Church, VA 22042 Dear Mr. Feinberg: Re: World Wide Network Services, LLC (WWNS) VS. DynCorp/Cerberus The National Black Church Initiative (NBCI), a faith­based coalition of 34,000 churches comprised of 15 denominations and 15.7 million African Americans, is dedicated to the eradication of racial disparities. We are working with our black church leadership partners and their 66,000 churches nationwide to use the full force of our combined 100,000 churches to advocate on behalf of our 1 membership and to bring attention to causes which disrupt the fabric of equality in the United States. Through recent press coverage we have been made aware of the atrocities committed by one of your companies, DynCorp International, against an African American owned business, Worldwide Network Services, LLC (WWNS). NBCI member and WWNS co­founder Reginald Bailey along with WWNS employees ­ many of whom were single mothers ­ and WWNS shareholders were the tragic victims of racial discrimination. The repercussions of that discrimination continue to damage, if not ruin, those affected by these egregious acts.
    [Show full text]
  • Blue Bird Corporation 2016 Proxy Statement
    February 3, 2017 Dear Fellow Shareholder: You are cordially invited to join Blue Bird Corporation’s Board of Directors and senior leadership at the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be held at 9:00 a.m. local time on Wednesday, March 8, 2017, at the Macon Marriott City Center, 240 Coliseum Drive, Macon, GA 31217. The accompanying Notice of the Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement provide important information about the meeting and will serve as your guide to the business to be conducted at the meeting. The Company’s 2016 Annual Report to Shareholders is also enclosed. We hope that you will be able to attend the meeting. Your vote is very important to us. We urge you to read the accompanying materials regarding the matters to be voted on at the meeting and to submit your voting instructions by proxy. You may submit your proxy either by returning the enclosed proxy card or voting instruction form, or by submitting your proxy over the telephone or the Internet. If you submit your proxy before the meeting but later decide to attend the meeting in person, you may still vote in person at the meeting. Thank you for your continued support. Sincerely, /s/ Phil Horlock Phil Horlock Chief Executive Officer and Director Blue Bird Corporation NOTICE OF 2017 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MARCH 8, 2017 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Blue Bird Corporation (the “Company”) will be held on Wednesday, March 8, 2017 at the hour of 9:00 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Albertsons Companies, Inc. Form DEF 14A Filed 2021-06-24
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM DEF 14A Definitive proxy statements Filing Date: 2021-06-24 | Period of Report: 2021-08-05 SEC Accession No. 0001140361-21-022208 (HTML Version on secdatabase.com) FILER Albertsons Companies, Inc. Mailing Address Business Address 250 PARKCENTER BLVD. 250 PARKCENTER BLVD. CIK:1646972| IRS No.: 000000000 | State of Incorp.:DE | Fiscal Year End: 0227 BOISE ID 83706 BOISE ID 83706 Type: DEF 14A | Act: 34 | File No.: 001-39350 | Film No.: 211043788 208-395-6200 SIC: 5411 Grocery stores Copyright © 2021 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document TABLE OF CONTENTS UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Filed by the Registrant ☒ Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐ Check the appropriate box: ☐ Preliminary Proxy Statement ☐ Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) ☒ Definitive Proxy Statement ☐ Definitive Additional Materials ☐ Soliciting Material Pursuant to Rule 14a-12 Albertsons Companies, Inc. (Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter) (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): ☒ No fee required ☐ Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. 1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies 2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: 3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): 4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: 5) Total fee paid: ☐ Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Facility Decommissioning and Site Remedial Actions
    LOCKHEED MARTI ES/ER/TM-227/Pt2 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION PROGRAM Nuclear FacUity Decommissioning and Site Remedial Actions: A Selected Bibliography, Vol. 18 Part 2. Indexes This document has been approved by the East Tennessee Technology Park Technical Information Office for release to the public. Date: 9'/<Z"?7 ENERGYSYSTEMS MANAGED BY LOCKHEED MARTIN ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. FOR THE UNITED STATES ER DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY UCN-17560 (8 8-95) Information International Associates, Inc. contributed to the preparation of this document and should not be considered an eligible contractor for its review. This report has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available from the Remedial Action Program Information Center, 138 Mitchell Road, Oak Ridge, TN 37830-7918, phone: 423-576-6500, fax: 423-576-6547, e-mail: [email protected]. ES/ER/TM-227/Pt2 Nuclear Facility Decommissioning and Site Remedial Actions: A Selected Bibliography, Vol. 18 Part 2. Indexes D8TOUHON OF THJS DOCUMENT IS Date Issued—September 1997 Prepared by Remedial Action Program Information Center and Information International Associates, Inc. Oak Ridge, Tennessee under subcontract 70K-GAM66 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management under budget and reporting code EW 20 LOCKHEED MARTIN ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. managing the Environmental Management Activities at the East Tennessee Technology Park Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant Oak Ridge National Laboratory under contract DE-AC05-84OR21400 for the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government.
    [Show full text]
  • 310 Small Arms Survey 2011
    310 SMALL ARMS SURVEY 2011 INDEX Arab Model Law on Weapons, Ammunitions private security companies, personnel Explosives and Hazardous Material 104 A 265 authorized transfers, light weapons Argentina 4, 9–35 acoustic technology, police weapons 83 exports, transparency 17 Automatic Colt Pistol (ACP) 74 ACP see Automatic Colt Pistol informal security groups 103 ACT see Australian Capital Territory private security companies, personnel Active Denial System 86 104 Adaptive Combat Rifle 76 Aristide, Jean-Bertrand 230, 231 B Aegis 125 Arizona (United States) Bamako Declaration see Organization of Afghanistan civilian firearms African Unity ammunition 76 carrying in public 295 banditry, Côte d’Ivoire 208–9 ATGWs 32–3 prohibited and restricted 272 Bangladesh light weapons use 23–4 transfer regulation 284 imports private security companies 101 Armatix (Germany) personalized gun mortars 24–5 armed 112, 115, 116 technology 80 reusable rocket launchers 29 firearm stockpiles 113 armed gangs, Haiti 253–5 Barrick Gold 142 firearm types 117–19 Armenia, imports, grenade launchers 26 Bédié, Henri Konan 195, 196, 197 illicit arms possession 119–20 Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) Belgium personnel 104 negotiations 43–4, 53–5 exports, transparency 15, 16, 19 Africa open-ended working group 53–4 private security companies, personnel private security companies, armed Preparatory Committee 54–5 104 114, 115 Arsenal (Bulgaria), airburst grenades 25 Belize regional measures, civilian firearms art, firearm use 286 civilian firearms 264 AT4 rocket launcher 27 licences 280, 282
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Environmental, Social, and Governance Report
    2018 Environmental, Social, and Governance Report Who We are Who We are The paper used in this report is 100% Legal Statement post-consumer waste, FSC* certified, This Report was created to summarize Cerberus’, and certain of its portfolio companies’, and made with wind power. Environmental, Social, and Governance (“ESG”) program only. It is not intended to summarize or describe any investment performance of the Cerberus Funds and Accounts * Forest Stewardship Council. FSC certification ensures that products come from or individual investments. The information contained herein may contain “forward looking responsibly managed forests that provide environmental, social, and economic benefits. statements”. Such forward looking statements, which can sometimes be identified by the use of terminology such as “may”, “will”, “should”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “target”, “intend”, “believe”, “continue”, or other variations or comparable language, are subject to various risks and uncertainties and actual events or results may differ materially. As such, they should not be relied on in any manner. This Report is provided solely for informational purposes only. It is not intended to be, nor should it be construed or used as, an offer to sell or a solicitation or any offer to buy, an interest in any Cerberus Fund or Account. Cerberus personnel generally adhere to the Cerberus ESG policy stated herein in connection with the exercise of their professional responsibilities, including their duty to manage various investments held by the Funds and Accounts. The ability and rights of Cerberus personnel to impose the Cerberus ESG policy on a portfolio company or other related investment is strictly limited to the rights such personnel may exercise (or elections they may make) as the representative of an investor, member or partner in the entity that owns such investment, subject to the organizational documents relating to such investment.
    [Show full text]
  • Total 2017 HIRES Final
    Hire Heroes USA Confirmed Hires for all of 2017 (Last) Service Service Rank Other Hiring Company Name Position Hired For Army CW-2 Special Security Officer Navy CW-4 Black Knight Financial Services IT Production Manager Army CW-4 ASM Research Benefits Lead Army 0-1 General Dynamics Manufacturing Engineer Army 0-1 Scribe America Medical Scribe Gwinnett County Office of Strategy & Army 0-1 Performance Mgmt. Business Analyst Marines 0-1 Campus Hollywood Instructor- Theater History and Acting Air Force 0-1 Global Threat & Risk Analyst Navy 0-1 Advanced Systems Development Help Desk Specialist Army 0-1 Fountain Middle School History Teacher Army W-5 United Airlines Pilot Marines W-5 San Diego Passport Agency Passport Support Associate Army W-5 Selective Service System Program Analyst Marines W-5 Ulta Beauty Warehouse Manager Army W-5 DOD Pilot Military Program Analyst-Organization Army W-5 US Army DOD and Personnel Force Development Army W-5 NES Associates Technical Director Army W-5 Program Manager Army W-5 AFS Army Fleet Service Test Flight Pilot Army W-5 Investigator Navy W-5 R3 Strategic support Group Manager Army W-5 AFSC/Magellan Federal Training Center Manager Navy W-5 Naval Systems Incorporated Senior Logistics Analyst Army W-5 Aviation Specialties Unlimited Aviator Marines W-5 District Manager Army W-4 TFW - Tsay Ferguson-Williams Deputy Project Manager Army W-4 CACI International Lessons Learned Analyst Army W-4 Colorado Springs Police Department Criminal Investigator Navy W-4 Naval Air Station Patuxent River Logistical Engineer
    [Show full text]
  • Download Dyncorp Complaint
    Case 1:16-cv-01473 Document 1 Filed 07/19/16 Page 1 of 32 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) 601 D. Street NW, Rm. 9134 ) Washington, DC 20004 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 16-cv-1473 ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL, LLC ) 1700 Old Meadow Road ) McLean, VA 22102 ) False Claims Act ) 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3733, Defendant ) Common Law Causes of Action __________________________________________) THE UNITED STATES’ COMPLAINT The United States of America, for its complaint, alleges as follows: 1. This action seeks treble damages and civil penalties under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3733, based on fraud, material false claims for payment, and material false statements made by defendant DynCorp International, LLC (“DynCorp”). DynCorp’s misconduct arose from its civilian police (“CIVPOL”) contract with the U.S. Department of State (“State Department”) to assist in the training and equipping of a new civilian police force in Iraq, and other services needed to support that effort, such as trainers, guards, translators, vehicles and living quarters for DynCorp and State Department employees. 2. DynCorp chose to subcontract several of its obligations under the CIVPOL contract to Corporate Bank Financial Services, Inc. (“Corporate Bank”), including requirements to provide lodging accommodations and local national (i.e., Iraqi) security guards, drivers, and translators. 1 Case 1:16-cv-01473 Document 1 Filed 07/19/16 Page 2 of 32 3. The CIVPOL contract initially authorized DynCorp’s services for a short period of time, and was extended several times between April 2004 through December 2008 (the “relevant time period”).
    [Show full text]
  • Application for Renewal of Honeywell Metropolis Works
    Honeywell Specialty Materials Honeywell P.O. Box 430 Highway 45 North Metropolis, IL 62960 618 524-2111 618 524-6239 Fax May 27, 2005 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (UPS: 301-415-6334) Attention: Michael Raddatz Fuel Cycle Licensing Branch, Mail Stop T-8A33 Two White Flint North, 11545 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 Subject: Renewal of USNRC Source Materials License Re: Docket No. 40-3392 License No. SUB-526 Dear Sirs, Please find enclosed the Honeywell International Inc. application for renewal of USNRC Source Materials License SUB-526 for Honeywell's Metropolis, Illinois Uranium Conversion Facility (Docket No. 40-3392). This application has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 40. The content and format of the application and supporting materials are generally consistent with the guidance provided in USNRC Regulatory Guide 3.55, "Standard Format and Content for the Health and Safety Section of License Renewal Applications for Uranium Hexafluoride Production." We have incorporated certain variations from this guidance consistent with our April 26, 2005 discussions with the NRC staff. Enclosed are the following: * One original and 7 copies of the Metropolis Works USNRC Source Materials License Application (Regulatory Guide 3.55 Chapters 1 through 7), including USNRC Form 313 * One original and 7 copies of the revised Metropolis Works Emergency Response Plan * One original and 7 copies of the Metropolis Works Safety Demonstration Report (Regulatory Guide 3.55 Chapters 8 through 14), including related drawings and appendices * One original and 7 copies of the Metropolis Works Environmental Report * One compact disc containing the text files for each of the above in pdf format Attached to this letter, please find a summary of the significant changes to the License Application and Safety Demonstration Report.
    [Show full text]