Withdraw from Mexico!

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Withdraw from Mexico! May, 1916 15 Cents Review A CRITICAL SURVEY OF INTERNATIONAL SOCIALISM WITHDRAW FROM MEXICO! Dangers of a Citizen Army Is India's Loyalty Forced? Free Speech and the Flag NEW REVIEW PUBLISHING ASSOCIATION 256 Broadway, New York Review Contents, May, 1916 REPRESENTATIVE SOCIALIST OPINIONS PAGE CURRENT AFFAIRS: Leaders 135 Withdraw from Mexico!; The Kaiser's Nationalism; The Teachers Organize; of L. B. Boudin's Congressman London on Immigration. Notes 138 IMMIGRATION PROBLEMS 143 Moses Oppenheimer THE DANGERS OF A CITIZEN ARMY 144 Frank Bohn THE ISSUE IN SCHENECTADY 146 SOCIALISM AND WAR Isaac A. Hourwich COMPANY OWNED TOWNS IN CALI- FORNIA 148 Austin Lewis INDIANS FORCED LOYALTY 149 Eugene V. Debs—Boudin's Socialism and War is a masterly re- Laj pat Rai HYPHENATED POETS 151 view and summing up of the war from a Socialist viewpoint and Ernest A. Boyd deserves the widest possible reading and circulation. THE THIRD INTERNATIONALE 153 FREE SPEECH AND FLAG IDOLATRY 155 Theodore Schroeder Joshua Wanhope—Boudin's work is well worthy the attention of FICTION STANDARDS-^OLD AND NEW 157 Mary S. Oppenheimer every careful student of the problems raised by the war. BETWEEN THE LINES 159 Richard Perin Appleton THE PLAYS 161 A. M. Simons—It is the only war book by an American Socialist The German Way; Erdgeist; that has added anything to the Socialist view of the war. Justice. BOOK REVIEWS 162 "The Sorrows of Belgium"; A Big Novel in a Bigger Bun- Austin Lewis—Boudin's Socialism and War is to a Socialist a dle; Meteorological Magic; In- most striking utterance on the conflict. * * * No student of modern equality of Races. conditions can afford to miss it. A SOCIALIST DIGEST 166 The Split in the Social Democracy; Magon Brothers Arrested Again; Ger- man Labor Unions and the Class Struggle; Fooling the German Censor. Isaac A. Hourwich—This is an honest book, which is quite rare in Copyright, 1916 by the New Review Publishing Ass'n. these days. The author starts by candidly admitting the contradic- Reprint permitted if Credit is Given. tions, brought to view by the war, between Socialist theory and practice, and seeks a way out. Leo Deutsch—Boudin's new book has all the good qualities of his To Our Readers volume on the Theoretical System of Karl Marx—comprehensive- ness, depth of analysis and a thorough knowledge of the subject un- der consideration. Boudin has something new and interesting to tell to all his readers—to those familiar with the subject as well as The paper market has been those new to the same. / demoralized by the war to an unprecedented extent. All publishers suffer, particularly California Social Democrat—Of all that has been said and written, small publishers. Hot only L. B. Boudin's book, Socialism and War, is probably the most con- has the price of white paper risen tremendously, but some- cise and inclusive statement of the problem. times the paper cannot be had. This is why the present issue of the NEW REVIEW is Handsomely Bound in Cloth. $1.10, Postpaid. printed on inferior paper._ We will endeavor to secure our regular stock for our next issue. But it does not depend NEW REVIEW PUBLISHING upon us, but upon the condi- tions of the paper market. ASSOCIATION 256 Broadway, New York City. New Review A CRITICAL SURVEY OF INTERNATIONAL SOCIALISM VOL. IV. 15c. a copy May, 1916 $1.50 a year No. 5 Hence their great joy at the news of the "punitive expedition." Current Affairs To imagine that Mr. Wilson and his immediate advisers are so stupid that they could not see what Withdraw From Mexico! was clear to everybody else, is, of course, utterly absurd. The Administration went into Mexico with HE inevitable has happened. The first clash its eyes open and fully expecting all that has hap- between our troops and the peaceful Mexican pened since. When Mr. Wilson gave the order to T population has occurred. In this first clash our troops to cross the border into Mexico he knew two American soldiers and forty Mexican civilians that long before they would get anywhere near lost their lives. That this clash was bound to occur Villa, "dead or alive," our soldiers would be killing sooner or later was evident all along, and must have civilian Mexicans and occasionally be killed by them. been known to the Administration in Washington, The sending of our troops into Mexico was there- as it was known to and hoped for by the interests fore either a momentous crime or a stupendous piece clamoring for intervention. That many more are of hypocrisy. Possibly both. bound to occur if our troops remain in Mexico much That Mr. Wilson does not want any war with longer is equally self-evident. And this, quite irre- Mexico is perhaps true. In fact very likely so. It spective of whether or not our soldiers in Mexico has been Mr. Wilson's chief characteristic since he are "looking for trouble," and deliberately provok- has assumed office to mean well and do wrong. He ing the Mexicans to deeds of violence. The fact that lacks the backbone which is necessary to translate in the clash at Parral only two Americans were good intentions into proper deeds. He was opposed killed as against forty Mexicans would go far to dis- to Preparedness, but was bowled over by Mr. Roose- prove the "peacefulness" of our troops there, and velt—swept off his feet by the Preparedness wave. would certainly indicate that the "attack" by the He is opposed to intervention in Mexico, but dared Mexicans was provoked. But even if the semi- not oppose the Hearsts, the Otises, and the clamor official version of the affair published by our "patri- of their yellow press. When the interventionists otic" newspapers be taken as true, the real character staged the Columbus "raid" he was bowled over and of this shameful business remains the san:e. The into the "punitive expedition"; probably hoping, like fact is that the very presence of our soldiers in Mr. Micawber, that "something might turn up" to Mexico is provocation enough to the Mexican popu- extricate us from the difficulty. lation. Unfortunately the nefarious business is such that You cannot send your armed forces into a neigh- nothing can "turn up" to extricate us from its boring country on a "punitive expedition" and ex- meshes. On the contrary: the further we go, the pect the inhabitants of that country to receive them more deeply involved we become; and whatever may with open arms; no matter what the official attiude now be expected to "turn up" will make our turning of the de jure or de facto government of that coun- back more difficult. try may be. This is particularly true in a case where The fact is that we have but one alternative left: your intentions to "intervene" in, or "protect," the either instant withdrawal of our troops, or "inter- neighboring country have been heralded far and vention," war, and conquest. wide, and there is more than reasonable ground to As Senator Stone, the chairman of the Senate believe that the "raid" which brought about the Committee on Foreign Affairs, has very frankly put "punitive expedition" was a "put up job" and the it: "The only alternative to withdrawing our troops "punitive expedition" itself merely the opening is intervention, sooner or later." phase of a permanent occupation. The clash be- Which shall it be: withdrawal or intervention? tween our troops and the Mexican population could This is the question that is up to Mr. Wilson. But therefore be foreseen and safely predicted the day this question is also up to the working class of this when our first soldiers crossed the border. It was country. If it raises its voice in favor of withdrawal foreseen and predicted by the interventionists. it may stiffen Mr. Wilson's back, and he may yet 136 NEW REVIEW defy the criminal clique clamoring for intervention, The new nationalism in the East of Europe is in- and order the withdrawal of our troops before it is vented to avoid the terms annexation or conquest, at too late. The workers of this country must there- which even some of Scheidemann's followers might fore let their voice be heard in the clear and ex- balk. Poland and the Baltic provinces are a tooth- plicit demand: some morsel to the German annexationists. On the WITHDRAW FROM MEXICO ! land east of the Baltic dwell the feudal landlords, L. B. B. German of origin and tongue, closely akin to the Prussian Junkers in their economic and political The Kaiser's Nationalism make-up. They have changed masters time and NCE again the mouthpiece of the Kaiser has again, ever willing to serve new sovereigns as long spoken in the Reichstag about peace terms. as their feudal prerogatives were not abridged. They O His words were aimed less at the deputies have furnished the Czar innumerable willing tools than at those outside, both in Germany and beyond. of oppression. They are ready to serve the Kaiser The groans for the end of the slaughter are getting on the terms of their former allegiance. Every Prus- more and more insistent, in spite of the censored sian Junker knows that if he knows little else. This newspapers and letters. They indicate a rising de- independent Nationalism simply means the exploita- mand for the terms of peace acceptable to official tion of the quasi-independent nationalities by Ger- Germany. That is the meaning of von Bethmann- man capitalism.—M. O. Hollweg's latest utterance.
Recommended publications
  • Jewish Socialists Around Vpered1
    BORIS SAPIR JEWISH SOCIALISTS AROUND VPERED1 SOCIALIST PROPAGANDA AMONG JEWS AND VPERED The importance of the "Lavrists" or "Vperedovtsy", named after the publication Vpered (Forward) (i873-1877) founded and edited by Peter Lavrovich Lavrov, in the evolution of the socialist ideas and groups in Russia has been recognized by historians from Alphonse Thun to Franco Venturi.2 The journal's role in the dissemination of the socialist credo among Russian Jews has never been seriously disputed, although seldom recorded in concrete terms. Of the leading Lavrists only Nicolas Kuliabko-Koretskii left memoirs.3 But he, as well as Lavrov who compiled an interesting outline of the main phases of the "Narodnichestvo"4 were not exceedingly interested in the Jewish aspect of their oeuvre. They touched this topic only in passing and, if at all, referred to Liberman whose Jewish socialism captivated their imagination. There was no reason for them to indicate and to dwell on the Jewish origin of socialist Jews in their midst who never associated themselves with any Jewish cause or aspirations. The outsiders who did so many years afterwards, knew too little about the internal affairs of Vpered and, therefore, either exaggerated its influence among Jews or underestimated the importance of leading Jewish Lavrists or, which 1 With slight changes this paper was read at the YIVO Research Conference on Jewish participation in movements devoted to the cause of social progress, New York, September 10-13, '964. 1 A. Thun, Geschichte der revolutionaren Bewegung in Russland, Leipzig 1883; F. Venturi, Roots of Revolution, London i960. The reader of this journal may find a condensed treatment of the position and influence of Vpered in Boris Sapir, Unknown Chapters in the history of Vpered, in: International Review of Social History, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • The Russian Revolution: a Wider Perspective
    - THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION: A WIDER PERSPECTIVE PREFACE to the Source Collection on the Russian Revolution This is a collection of sources provided by members of the Euroclio network and curated by three members of the Historiana team. It Insert Source here: is not a comprehensive overview of the Russian Revolution. Its purpose is to provide some insights into how politicians, diplomats, senior military officers, other officials, revolutionaries, eye witnesses, bystanders, newspaper editors and journalists, ordinary people and even children perceived some of the key events in Russia from January 1917 through to December 1922. We hope that this transnational and multiperspective collection will widen students’ understanding of what happened in Russia in those critical years. The sources have been provided by history teachers and historians from 13 countries, including the Russian Federation, neighbouring states that in 1917 were part of the Russian Empire, states that were then allies or enemies of Russia and even states which were neutral non-combatants in 1917. To obtain these sources the contributors turned to their own national digital and physical archives. Where necessary, contributors summarised texts in English. Painting by British artist David For EUROCLIO this was a pilot experiment in collecting historical Jagger, entitled The Bolshevik sources and we are very grateful to everyone who took part. We (1918). The image combines the think the experiment was successful and EUROCLIO will be planning features of several Bolshevik further crowd-sourcing of collections on other significant moments leaders. and developments in world history in the future. Source: Canadian War Museum Bob Stradling, Louise Sträuli and Giulia Rossi Public Domain Summer 2019 THE HISTORICAL CONTEXT This collection is divided into four Introductionsections.
    [Show full text]
  • "Mein Leben" – "Моя Жизнь" Trockijs Autobiographie Essay
    "Mein Leben" – "Моя Жизнь" Trockijs Autobiographie Essay "Mein Leben" – "Моя Жизнь" Ein Essay über Trockijs Autobiographie und den jungen Trockij (1879-1904) von Wolfgang und Petra Lubitz, 2018/19 ________________________________________________________________________ Dieser Essay erscheint als Teil von Lubitz' TrotskyanaNet Inhaltsverzeichnis (1) Einleitung, Vorbemerkungen.............................................................................3 Zum Thema........................................................................................................................3 Zum Inhalt.........................................................................................................................3 Formale Hinweise.................................................................................................................4 (2) "Mein Leben" – Bibliographisch-buchhistorisches und Kurioses........................5 Einleitung...........................................................................................................................5 Buchbeschreibung der deutschen Erstausgabe.........................................................................5 Die russische Erstausgabe.....................................................................................................8 Vorabdrucke........................................................................................................................8 Online-Ausgaben.................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • A Revolution That Has Not Happened: the Potential of the Russian Nationalist Revival
    DOI: 10.12797/9788376389042.05 Joachim Diec Jagiellonian University, Kraków Chapter 4 A Revolution That Has Not Happened: The Potential of the Russian Nationalist Revival Introductory remarks World history abounds with revolutionary political changes. What does not seem important about that topic is the theoretical framework, which allows many scholars to discuss whether a political series of events can be put into the conceptual, systemic framework of “revolution” or not. What is widely accepted among theoreticians is the conviction that a revolution is a radical and anti-systemic political change. The theoretical understanding of revolution is related to the legitimacy of authority. The Weberian tradition includes 3 types of authority: traditional, legal-rational, and charismatic (comp. the critical remarks of Blau, 1963). According to it, a revolution can either violently break the people’s readiness to obey commands of a culturally rooted power or overthrow the old regime by acting according to a new system of laws, which replaces 68 Joachim Diec the previous one without a sense of remorse. The new leaders and their style can often be defined as charismatic but theoretically we can easily think of a new, even more charismatic avant-garde, which steals the show: in revolutions a more radical kind of modernity usually replaces the previous style, which is perceived to be not revolutionary enough. In other words, revolutions undermine the base of all the three types of authority. However, what really matters is the fact that after a revolution one’s smaller or bigger world will never be the same. Revolutions are incongruent with Tancredi’s (a character of Lampedusa’s Leopard) conviction that “For everything to stay the same, everything must change”.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Social-Democracy and Iskra, 1900-1904
    RUSSIAN SOCIAL-DEMOCRACY AND I3KRA, 1900 - 1904 by NORMAN ANDERSON JONES R. S., Kansas State College of Agriculture and Applied Science, 1950 A THESIS submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the de<»ree MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of History, Government, and Philosophy KANSAS STATE COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE AND APPLIED SCIENCE 1952 ii LD; 1 2&1 v> Tf 1952. V 16V TABLE OF CONTENTS Vo C.Z 1 PREFACE ill <v CHAPTER I, INTRODUCTION TO RUSSIAN SOCIAL-DEMOCRACY el Russia and the Narodniki 1 The Emancipation of Labor Group u First Party Congress at Minsk 8 The Young Leaders, Lenin, Martov, and Potresov 10 CHAPTER II. THE FOUNDING OF I3KRA Objectives and Tasks of the Party Organ 16 Iskra and Zarya 19 Early Conflicts Among the Editors of Iskra and Zarya 25 l3kra and Zarya versus "Economism" 36 CHAPTER III. PUBLISHING ISKRA AND ZARYA 55 CHAPTER IV. THE SECOND CONGRESS AND ITS AFTERMATH Pre-Con,";ress Preparations 78 The Congress Meets 83 The Debates and Business of the Congress 87 SUMMARY 101 BIBLIOGRAPHY 102 APPENDIX 105 iii PREFACE The constitutional democracy of the Western World la today ranged a- gainst the political forces of the Soviet Union. The tensions created by the resulting ideological dashes seem to be manifestly increasing rather than abating. Within this world 3cene each man finds it hi3 part to make political and social Judgments whether he is consider! ng the actions of a nation or the personal conduct of one individual. As never before he is confronted with the need for maintaining a scholarly perspective as a requisite for making sound Judgments.
    [Show full text]
  • Krasnaya Zvezda”
    Universidade de Sao~ Paulo Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciencias^ Humanas Departamento de Historia´ Programa de Pos-Gradua´ c¸ao~ em Historia´ Economica^ \Krasnaya Zvezda" Uma leitura pol´ıtico-econ^omica da primeira utopia liter´aria sovi´etica Pedro Ramos de Toledo S~ao Paulo 2019 Vers~ao Corrigida Universidade de Sao~ Paulo Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciencias^ Humanas Departamento de Historia´ Programa de Pos-Gradua´ c¸ao~ em Historia´ Economica^ \Krasnaya Zvezda" Uma leitura pol´ıtico-econ^omica da primeira utopia liter´aria sovi´etica Pedro Ramos de Toledo Dissertac¸~ao apresentada ao Programa de P´os- Graduac¸~ao em Hist´oria Econ^omica do Depar- tamento de Hist´oria da Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ci^encias Humanas da Universidade de S~ao Paulo, para obtenc¸~ao do t´ıtulo de Mestre em Hist´oria. Orientador: Prof. Dr. Luiz Bernardo Murtinho Peric´as S~ao Paulo 2019 Vers~ao Corrigida Autorizo a reprodução e divulgação total ou parcial deste trabalho, por qualquer meio convencional ou eletrônico, para fins de estudo e pesquisa, desde que citada a fonte. Catalogação na Publicação Serviço de Biblioteca e Documentação Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas da Universidade de São Paulo Toledo, Pedro T649k "Krasnaya Zvezda": uma leitura político-econômica da primeira utopia literária soviética. / Pedro Toledo ; orientador Luiz Bernardo Pericás. - São Paulo, 2019. 256 f. Dissertação (Mestrado)- Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas da Universidade de São Paulo. Departamento de História. Área de concentração: História Econômica. 1. Revolução Russa. 2. Bolchevismo. 3. Marxismo. 4. Utopia. I. Pericás, Luiz Bernardo, orient.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical History of Socialist University of Sheffield June 1980
    VoLT A Critical History of Socialist Thought In Japan To 1918 John Derek Crump Doctor of Philosophy Centre of Japanese Studies, University of Sheffield June 1980 This study is dedicated to the working class in Japan, in the hope that a day will come when (along with the workers throughout the rest of the world) they will decide to get up off their knees. 1. PREFACE The idea of writing this study came to me a full 10 years ago, when I spoke not a word of Japanese, had never been to Japan, and I knew next to nothing about the country. Over the last 10 years by have walked a long and often hard road, but I have been assisted many people who have given me a helping hand along the way. I should like to thank the staff of the Centre of Japanese in Studies at the University of Sheffield for giving me a grounding Japanese and for putting up with a sometimes difficult undergraduate Healey, student. In particular, I should like to thank Graham who first gave up several hours of his own time to guide me through my (and I stuttering lessons in Japanese who later supervised me when became a postgraduate student). After graduating from Sheffield, I spent the next 2 years at the to Institute of Social Science, University of TUkyo and then returned further the Centre of Japanese Studies, University of Sheffield for a by 3 years. During these periods I lived on scholarships provided the Japanese Ministry of Education and the British Social Science Research Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Marx, Die Russische Revolution Und Ihre Folgen | Adrian Zimmermann
    Marx, die russische Revolution und ihre Folgen Von Adrian Zimmermann Russland war bis in die zweite Hälfte des 19. Jahrhunderts ein rückstän- diger, von einer despotischen Monarchie regierter Agrarstaat. 1848 waren Marx und Engels deshalb überzeugt, dass die demokratische Revolution nur in einem Krieg gegen Russland, den bei den Demokraten verhassten »Gendarmen Europas« siegen könne (Rjasanow 1909, 1–5). Doch gerade seine Rückständigkeit führte zur Niederlage des Zaren- reichs im Krimkrieg (1853–1856). Das Regime begann nun die Moderni- sierung des Riesenreichs unter anderem mit einer Landreform voranzu- treiben. Doch auch nach der sogenannten Abschaffung der Leibeigenschaft 1861 wurden die russischen Bauern und Bäuerinnen keineswegs zu freien Eigentümern. Das Land blieb überwiegend Eigentum adliger Grossgrund- besitzer, des autokratischen Staats und der Kirche. Die russische bäuerliche Landbevölkerung erhielt Nutzungsrechte am Boden, für die sie Grund- zinsen zu entrichten hatte, die bewusst höher lagen als der Bodenertrag. Trotz oder gerade wegen der halbherzigen Reformen wuchs der Zulauf zur revolutionären Bewegung. Diese bestand anfänglich vor allem aus Intel- lektuellen, den Narodniki (›VolkstümlerInnen‹), welche Bildungsarbeit in der überwiegend bäuerlichen Bevölkerung leisteten und gezielte Attentate auf Exponenten der Unterdrückungsapparate verübten. Nun erwarteten Marx und Engels zunehmend den baldigen Ausbruch einer Revolution in Russland. Sie unterhielten rege Kontakte zu den im westeuropäischen Exil lebenden russischen RevolutionärInnen,
    [Show full text]
  • Prof. Stoleshnikov AP Third Edition, Supplemented . 2012
    " Rehabilitation will not" Prof. Stoleshnikov AP Third edition, supplemented . 2012. Instead epigraph : I'm talking about us, the sons of Sinai, About us whose view other heat warmed . Let the Russian people is a different path, Prior to their Slavic cases we do not care We ate their food, but paid with blood. The accounts are kept, but do not let down. We will avenge - flowers in the head their north country. When lacquer wears off test, When the stall red screaming roar , We stand at the grave of birch In honor guard . Jewish poet D. Marques: introduction This book - the accusation. And like any accusation, it is a collection of documents that you have so far been unknown. Because blaming a responsible, all primary sources carefully checked and names are given , both in Russian and English languages. These primary sources for a long time , but only for those who are interested in this issue , known in the West. This book is not a sweeping indictment of all Jews indiscriminately; she blames only international organized Jewry and the part of the Jews, which was involved in his dark deeds. That is a charge of only those Jews who themselves, as they say, “The cat knows whose meat is eaten ." Prof. Stoleshnikov AP Chapter 1. Victor Marsden The first document proving the Jewish nature, established in 1917 by the "Soviet" government had a list of senior officials of the Soviet government, drawn up in 1919 by British journalist of the newspaper “Morning Post " Victor Marsden . Victor Emile Marsden (1866 - October 28 , 1920 ) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victor_E._Marsden Victor Marsden also translated into English and the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion » http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1923_75p._Title_p.-_PSM_-_The_Britons_-Marsden.jpg.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Socialists Around Vpered1
    BORIS SAPIR JEWISH SOCIALISTS AROUND VPERED1 SOCIALIST PROPAGANDA AMONG JEWS AND VPERED The importance of the "Lavrists" or "Vperedovtsy", named after the publication Vpered (Forward) (i873-1877) founded and edited by Peter Lavrovich Lavrov, in the evolution of the socialist ideas and groups in Russia has been recognized by historians from Alphonse Thun to Franco Venturi.2 The journal's role in the dissemination of the socialist credo among Russian Jews has never been seriously disputed, although seldom recorded in concrete terms. Of the leading Lavrists only Nicolas Kuliabko-Koretskii left memoirs.3 But he, as well as Lavrov who compiled an interesting outline of the main phases of the "Narodnichestvo"4 were not exceedingly interested in the Jewish aspect of their oeuvre. They touched this topic only in passing and, if at all, referred to Liberman whose Jewish socialism captivated their imagination. There was no reason for them to indicate and to dwell on the Jewish origin of socialist Jews in their midst who never associated themselves with any Jewish cause or aspirations. The outsiders who did so many years afterwards, knew too little about the internal affairs of Vpered and, therefore, either exaggerated its influence among Jews or underestimated the importance of leading Jewish Lavrists or, which 1 With slight changes this paper was read at the YIVO Research Conference on Jewish participation in movements devoted to the cause of social progress, New York, September 10-13, '964. 1 A. Thun, Geschichte der revolutionaren Bewegung in Russland, Leipzig 1883; F. Venturi, Roots of Revolution, London i960. The reader of this journal may find a condensed treatment of the position and influence of Vpered in Boris Sapir, Unknown Chapters in the history of Vpered, in: International Review of Social History, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Sozialreformismus Und Radikale Gesellschaftliche Transformation Historische Debatten in Der Sozialdemokratie in Deutschland Und Russland
    Sozialreformismus und radikale gesellschaftliche Transformation Historische Debatten in der Sozialdemokratie in Deutschland und Russland Herausgegeben von Rudolf Traub-Merz РОССПЭН Москва 2015 УДК 94(100)"654" ББК 66.1(0) Das Buch wurde mit der Unterstützung der Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (Filiale in der Russischen Föderation) herausgegeben Sozialreformismus und radikale gesellschaftliche Transfor­ mation – Historische Debatten in der Sozialdemokratie in Deutschland und Russland / Hrsg. von Rudolf Traub-Merz. MOSKAU: Politische Enzyklopädie, 2015. ISBN 978-5-8243-1950-7 Der Sammelband fasst zentrale Beiträge einer internationalen Konferenz zum Thema „Reform oder Revolution? Die russische und deut- sche Sozialdemokratie und Herausforderungen des 20. Jahrhunderts“ zu- sammen. Die Konferenz wurde gemeinsam vom Russischen Staatsarchiv für sozialpolitische Geschichte (RGASPI), der Russischen Vereinigung für Politikwissenschaft (RAPN) und dem Moskauer Büro der Friedrich- Ebert-Stiftung im November 2013 durchgeführt. Anlass waren wichtige Gründungsjubiläen: 150 Jahre deutsche Sozialdemokratie (1863) und 130 Jahre russische Sozialdemokratie (1883). In ihren Beiträgen beleuchten Historiker, Soziologen und Polito- logen aus Russland und Deutschland die Sonderstellung der deut- schen Sozialdemokratie, ihren Einfluss auf die Entwicklung der rus- sischen Sozialdemokratie, die prägenden sozialen Herausforderungen des Industriezeitalters und die Aktualität politischer Antworten der Sozialdemokratie. Die Publikation erscheint in russischer und in deutscher Sprache. Der Sammelband richtet sich an Wissenschaftler und an Leser, die sich für die sozialen Kämpfe, in denen sich moderne Gesellschaften formierten, und für die Entstehung und den politischen Einfluss der Sozialdemokratie interessieren. УДК 94(100)"654" ББК 66.1(0) ISBN 978-5-8243-1950-7 © Autorenkollektiv, 2015 © Politische Enzyklopädie, 2015 GlieDeRunG Vorwort . .5 Reform und Revolution in der deutschen Sozialdemokratie – Anmerkungen zu ihrer Geschichte Rudolf Traub-Merz .
    [Show full text]
  • The Odyssey of Nicholas Russel Ronald Hayashida and David
    The Odyssey of Nicholas Russel Ronald Hayashida and David Kittelson The Senate President of Hawaii's first Territorial Legislature was Nicholas Russel, a peripatetic Russian revolutionary who founded socialist movements throughout Europe and, after his Island sojourn, continued his tireless activities in Japan, the Philippines, and China. He mastered eight European languages and spoke Hawaiian, Japanese, Chinese, and several Philippine dialects. "He was an internationalist," declared I. I. Popov, "not in words, but in deeds, in the broadest meaning of this word—a man of humanity."1 Russel was born as Nikolai Konstantinovich Sudzilovskii on December 3, 1850 in Mogilev, Byelorussia. After entering Petersburg University in 1868 as a law student, he transferred to the medical school at Kiev University. During his student years Sudzilovskii embarked on what was to become a lifetime career as a political activist.2 In 1874 he fled Russia, sought by the czarist police for violation of Article 193 of Russia's Criminal Code—a prohibition against revolutionary propaganda and agitation. Sudzilovskii was described on a "most wanted" list as: Former student of Kiev University, son of a retired official of the provincial city Mogilev. Age—25, height—a little lower than average; hair—light brown; face—clear; nose, rather large; small, sparse beard; slovenly dressed; his suit resembles a factory-hand's outfit.3 He went to London where he interned for a while at St. George's Hospital and once shared a speaker's platform at a rally with Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels.4 Sudzilovskii later turned up in Geneva where he married his first wife by whom he had two daughters.
    [Show full text]