NOTES INTRODUCTION 1. Baron Employed This Expression in His Book, Which Is the First (And Only) Western Monograph on Plekhanov

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NOTES INTRODUCTION 1. Baron Employed This Expression in His Book, Which Is the First (And Only) Western Monograph on Plekhanov NOTES INTRODUCTION 1. Baron employed this expression in his book, which is the first (and only) Western monograph on Plekhanov: Samuel H. Baron, Plekhanov. The Father of Russian Marxism, Stanford (California), Stanford U.P., 1963. See also Isaiah Berlin, 'Le "pere" du marxisme russel, Le contrat social, 1957 (I), pp.293-297. 2. Baron did not pay special attention to Plekhanov's thought in his biography, which focused mostly on Plekhanov's political activity. On Plekhanov's esthetics see, for instance: L. Baxandall, 'Marxism and Aesthetics: A Critique of the Contribution of George Plekhanov', The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 1966-1967 (25), pp.267-279. 3. L. Trotsky, 'Beglye mysli 0 G.V. Plekhanove', Pod znamenem marksizma (henceforeward PZM), 1922,5-6, p.10. 4. S.Ja. Vol'fson, G.v. Plekhanov, Minsk 1924; V. Vaganian, G.V. Plekhanov, M. 1924. See S.H. Baron, op.cit., p.VII. 5. 'Pis'mo tOY. Stalina, resenija XVII V sesojuznoj Konferencii i filosofskij front', PZM, 1931,9-10, pp.7-8. 6. Spravocnik partijnogo rabotnika, M. 1957, pp.365-366. Plekhanov was born on November 29 (December, 11), 1856. 7. G.V. Plekhanov, Izbrannye filosofskie proizvedenija, M. 1956-1958,5 vv.; SoCinenija, M.-Pg. 1923-1927,24 vv. 8. A.F. Okulov, 'Bor'ba G.V. Plekhanova protiv neokantianskoj revizii marksizma', Voprosy filosofii (henceforth VF), 1956, 6, p.23. 9. On Plekhanov's fortune, see below, Appendix. 10. N.T. Sorokina noticed it in 1960 [Voprosy teorii poznanija v filosofskikh rabotakh G.V. Plekhanova (1898-1911 gg.), Avtoreferat, Gorky, 1960, p.3]. Since then, the situation has not changed very much. 11. V.I. Lenin, Materializm i empiriokriticizm, in Pol'noe sobranie soCinenij (henceforth PSS), iz. 5-oe, M., 1958-... , t.18, pp. 244-251. CHAPTER ONE 1. Plekhanov's move from Populism to Marxism is one of the 134 NOTES 135 most intriguing and complicated moments in his intellectual biography. See S.H. Baron, op.cit., pp.59-77; L. Deutsch, 'Kak Plekhanov stal marksistom', Proletarskaja Revoljucija, 1922, 7, pp.97-140. 2. P. Struve, 'My Conflicts and Contacts with Lenin', The Slavonic and East European Review, XII, p.579, quoted in Baron, op.cit., p;,142. On Plekhanov's NaSi raznoglasija [1884] see also V.L Lenin, eto takoe "druz'ja naroda" i kak oni vojujut protiv social-demokratov? [Who are the "Friends of the People" and How do They War against Social Democrats?], in PSS, t.1, pp.196-198; N. Valentinov, The Early Years of Lenin, tr. R.H.W. Theen, Ann Arbor, Univ. of Michigan Press, 1969, p. 88. 3. Friedrich Engels Briefwechsel mit Karl Kautsky, hrsg. von B. Kautsky, 2. Ausg., Wien, Danubia Verlag, 1955, p.320. 4. Arkhiv Doma Plekhanova [henceforth ADP], AP.12.1, in LN. Kurbatova, 'Predislovie', in Katalog biblioteki G.V. Plekhanova, vyp.I, L. 1965, p.VL 5. S.H. Baron, op.cit., p.66. 6. A. Walicki, 'II problema della rivoluzione russa in Plechanov', tr. L. Tulli, Annali, Istituto G.G. Feltrinelli, Milano, 1973 (XV), p.461. To compare Plekhanov's opinions on the relationship between freedom and necessity with Spinoza's, Schelling's and Hegel's, see: 1895a, pp.590-596; 1898a, pp.300-311; 1908a, pp.189-191. 7. Plekhanov held this opinion all his life. See, for instance: 1880, pp.137-149; 1883, pp.21-23; 1902b, pp.207-208. On this subject, see also N. Harding, 'Introduction', in Marxism in Russia. Key Documents 1879-1906, Cambridge, Cambridge U. P., 1983, pp.1-3; 13-15; 38. v 8. See B.A. Cagin - LN. Kurbatova, Plekhanov, M., 1973, p.140; R.Ju. Gubajdullin, Metodologiceskie osnovy kritiki G.V. P lekhanovym narodnicestva (1893-1895 gg .), Avtoreferat, Kazan' 1968, p.5. 9. V. Strada, 'Materialismo e dialettica nel marxismo di Plechanov', Annali, Istituto G.G. Feltrinelli, Milano, 1973 (XV), p.480. 10. See G.W.F. Hegel, Wissenschaft der Logik, in Siimtliche Werke, hrsg. von H. Glockner, Stuttgart, Fr. Fromman, 1927-1940, Bd.IV, pp.137-138. 11. See G.W.F. Hegel, op.cit., Bd.IV, p.609. There is a very meaningful difference between the original German text and Plekhanov's Russian paraphrase. Hegel wrote: "daB ich den ersten und zweiten Schlag einer Uhr als succedirend ... bestimme"; Plekhanov did 136 NOTES not use the verb opredelit' (to determine), but vosprinimat' (to perceive). Actually in his reception and understanding of Kantianism the a priori elements, as 'physiological' structures, were 'forms' of perception and not 'forms' of intellect. See below, Ch. 2, IV; Ch. 3, lILA. 12. LM. Secenov, 'Predmetnaja mysl' i dejstvitel'nost" [Objective Thought and Reality]' in Izbrannye filosofskie i psikhologiceskie proizvedenija, M., 1947, pp.350, 359. 13. F. Engels, Ludwig Feuerbach und der Ausgang der klassischen deutschen Philosophie, in Marx-Engels, Werke, Berlin, Dietz Verlag, 1961-1967, Bd.21, p.276. 14. See below, Appendix. 15. O.G. Mazaeva, Voprosy sub"ekto-ob"ektnykh otnosenij v trudakh G.V. Plekhanova, Avtoreferat, Tomsk 1976, pp.6-7. According to the author, the second conception should prevail, not because it is more frequent, but because it is much deeper and more meaningful. On this problem, see below, Conclusion. 16. See K. Marx, Das Kapital, in Marx-Engels, Werke, Bd.23, pp.192-193. 17. In English in the original. 18. L.E. Obolenskij, 'Predislovie', in G. Tarde, Suscnost' iskusstva, tr. L.E. Obolenskij, SPb 1895, pp.9-1O. See also V.V. Vel'janovic, Psikho-Jiziologiceskie osnovanija estetiki, SPb, 1878. 19. For a polemic reference in the text, see, for instance, 1899c, p.7. Besides that, V.G. Astakhov's opinion supports this interpretation [see his G.V. Plekhanov i N.G. Chernyshevsky, Stalinabad, 1961, pp.257-259]. 20. Among the Western scholars, e.g.: G. Pacini, 'II pensiero estetico in Plechanov', in G.V. Plechanov, Scritti di estetica, Roma, Samona e Savelli, 1972, pp.19-23; among the Soviet ones: V.G. Astachov, op.cit., pp.263-270; V.G. Astakhov, 'G.V. Plekhanov ob esteticeskom cuvstve', Ucenye zapiski Tadzikskogo Universiteta, 1959, 19, vyp.3, p.29. 21. Mazaeva thinks that this is a general conception: 'Vzgliady G.V. Plekhanova na prirodu poznanija', in Zakonomernosti razvitija sovremennoj nauki, Tomsk 1981, p.217. 22. F. Staudinger, 'Der Streit urn das Ding an sich und seine Erneuerung im sozialistischen Lager', Kantstudien, Berlin 1899, pp.167-189. 23. K. Schmidt, 'Ein neues Buch tiber die materialistische Geschichtsauffassung', Der sozialistische Akademiker, 1896, 7, pp.399-407; 8, pp.475-482. 24. Samuel H. Baron insists on the psychological reasons for NOTES 137 Plekhanov's polemics against revisionism [S.H. Baron, op.cit., p.175]. Claude Weill, whose authoritative work is often recalled in this paragraphe, does not wholly agree with Baron, rather insisting on the importance that Plekhanov attached to theoretical orthodoxy by itself [C. Weill, Marxistes russes et socialdemocratie allemande. 1898-1904, Paris, Maspero, 1977, p.105]. 25. Plekhanov had undoubtedly a special inclination for polemics. Osip went so far as to state that for Plekhanov it was a "cunning means of knowledge" [V.G. Osip, Gnoseologiceskie problemy gumanitarnykh nauk v teoreticeskom nasledii G.V. Plekhanova, Avtoreferat, Gorky 1979, p.12]. 26. A.M. Voden, 'Vospominanija. Besedy s Engels'om', in Russkie sovremenniki 0 K. Marx'e i F. Engels'e, M. 1969, pp.103-104. 27. E. Bernstein, 'Das realistische und das ideologische Moment im Sozialismus', Die Neue Zeit, JgXVI, Bd.n, p.226 note. 28. ADP, Fond N° 1093, Ed.khr. T.68, p.2. 29. On the relationship between Rosa Luxemburg and Plekhanov, see J.P. Netd, Rosa Luxemburg, London, Oxford U.P., 1966, passim, in particular v.I, pp.68-69. 30. Protokoll iiber die Verhandlungen des Parteitages der Sozialdemokratischen Partei Deutschlands, abgehalten zu Stuttgart, vom 3. bis 8. Oktober 1898, Berlin, Vorwarts, 1898, p.130. Kautsky replied to Plekhanov's open letter with a short note: 'In eigener Sache', Die Neue Zeit, Jg.xvn, Bd.I, p.220. 31. Protokoll ... , pp.126-130; 132-135. 32. S.H. Baron, op.cit., pp.192-194. 33. R. Luxemburg, Briefe an Leon Jogisches, Frankfurt am Main, Europaische Verlagsanstalt, 1971, p.104. 34. Labriola to Kautsky, 8.X.1898, Kautsky NachlajJ, International Instituut voor Sociale Geschiedenis, KD. 439, quoted in Bo Gustafsson, Marxismus und Revisionismus. Eduard Bernsteins Kritik des Marxismus und ihre ideen-geschichtlichen Voraussetzungen, Frankfurt am Main, Europaische Verlagsanstalt, 1972, v.n, pA22. 35. K Schmidt, 'Einige Bemerkungen tiber Plechanows letzten Artikel in der Neuen Zeit', Die Neue Zeit, J g.xvn, Bd.I, pp.324-334. On Plekhanov's judgement, see also his letter to Ljubov' Aksel'rod, 1898xn.15. 36. K Schmidt, 'Was ist Materialismus?', Die Neue Zeit, JgXVn, Bd.I, pp.697-698. 37. K. Kautsky, 'Bernstein und die materialistische 138 NOTES Geschichtsauffassung', Die Neue Zeit, Jg.XVIl, Bd.Il, ppA-16; 'Bernstein und die Dialektik', Die Neue Zeit, Jg.XVII, Bd.II, pp.36-50. 38. A. Nedow (A.M. Voden), 'Plechanow versus Ding an sich', Sozialistische Monatshefte, 1899, 3, pp.104-112; Chajm Schitlowsky, 'Die Polemik Plechanow contra Stern und Conrad Schmidt', Sozialistische Monatshefte, 1899, 5, pp.277-283; 6, pp.322-331. 39. Longuet probably meant the first version of Plekhanov's article 'Cant protiv Kanta iIi dukhovnoe zavescanie g. Bernstein'a', published after various re-writings in Zarja. [1901b] 40. E. Bernstein, Wie ist wissenschaftlicher Sozialismus moglich?, Berlin, Verlag der Sozialistischen Monatshefte, 1901. 41. See above, on Wilhelm Liebknecht's and Rosa Luxemburg's attitudes towards Plekhanov's positions. During the 1930's Soviet scholars blamed Plekhanov for having reduced his criticism of revisionism to an "academic dispute", by overemphasizing its philosophical aspects.
Recommended publications
  • Jewish Socialists Around Vpered1
    BORIS SAPIR JEWISH SOCIALISTS AROUND VPERED1 SOCIALIST PROPAGANDA AMONG JEWS AND VPERED The importance of the "Lavrists" or "Vperedovtsy", named after the publication Vpered (Forward) (i873-1877) founded and edited by Peter Lavrovich Lavrov, in the evolution of the socialist ideas and groups in Russia has been recognized by historians from Alphonse Thun to Franco Venturi.2 The journal's role in the dissemination of the socialist credo among Russian Jews has never been seriously disputed, although seldom recorded in concrete terms. Of the leading Lavrists only Nicolas Kuliabko-Koretskii left memoirs.3 But he, as well as Lavrov who compiled an interesting outline of the main phases of the "Narodnichestvo"4 were not exceedingly interested in the Jewish aspect of their oeuvre. They touched this topic only in passing and, if at all, referred to Liberman whose Jewish socialism captivated their imagination. There was no reason for them to indicate and to dwell on the Jewish origin of socialist Jews in their midst who never associated themselves with any Jewish cause or aspirations. The outsiders who did so many years afterwards, knew too little about the internal affairs of Vpered and, therefore, either exaggerated its influence among Jews or underestimated the importance of leading Jewish Lavrists or, which 1 With slight changes this paper was read at the YIVO Research Conference on Jewish participation in movements devoted to the cause of social progress, New York, September 10-13, '964. 1 A. Thun, Geschichte der revolutionaren Bewegung in Russland, Leipzig 1883; F. Venturi, Roots of Revolution, London i960. The reader of this journal may find a condensed treatment of the position and influence of Vpered in Boris Sapir, Unknown Chapters in the history of Vpered, in: International Review of Social History, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • The Russian Revolution: a Wider Perspective
    - THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION: A WIDER PERSPECTIVE PREFACE to the Source Collection on the Russian Revolution This is a collection of sources provided by members of the Euroclio network and curated by three members of the Historiana team. It Insert Source here: is not a comprehensive overview of the Russian Revolution. Its purpose is to provide some insights into how politicians, diplomats, senior military officers, other officials, revolutionaries, eye witnesses, bystanders, newspaper editors and journalists, ordinary people and even children perceived some of the key events in Russia from January 1917 through to December 1922. We hope that this transnational and multiperspective collection will widen students’ understanding of what happened in Russia in those critical years. The sources have been provided by history teachers and historians from 13 countries, including the Russian Federation, neighbouring states that in 1917 were part of the Russian Empire, states that were then allies or enemies of Russia and even states which were neutral non-combatants in 1917. To obtain these sources the contributors turned to their own national digital and physical archives. Where necessary, contributors summarised texts in English. Painting by British artist David For EUROCLIO this was a pilot experiment in collecting historical Jagger, entitled The Bolshevik sources and we are very grateful to everyone who took part. We (1918). The image combines the think the experiment was successful and EUROCLIO will be planning features of several Bolshevik further crowd-sourcing of collections on other significant moments leaders. and developments in world history in the future. Source: Canadian War Museum Bob Stradling, Louise Sträuli and Giulia Rossi Public Domain Summer 2019 THE HISTORICAL CONTEXT This collection is divided into four Introductionsections.
    [Show full text]
  • "Mein Leben" – "Моя Жизнь" Trockijs Autobiographie Essay
    "Mein Leben" – "Моя Жизнь" Trockijs Autobiographie Essay "Mein Leben" – "Моя Жизнь" Ein Essay über Trockijs Autobiographie und den jungen Trockij (1879-1904) von Wolfgang und Petra Lubitz, 2018/19 ________________________________________________________________________ Dieser Essay erscheint als Teil von Lubitz' TrotskyanaNet Inhaltsverzeichnis (1) Einleitung, Vorbemerkungen.............................................................................3 Zum Thema........................................................................................................................3 Zum Inhalt.........................................................................................................................3 Formale Hinweise.................................................................................................................4 (2) "Mein Leben" – Bibliographisch-buchhistorisches und Kurioses........................5 Einleitung...........................................................................................................................5 Buchbeschreibung der deutschen Erstausgabe.........................................................................5 Die russische Erstausgabe.....................................................................................................8 Vorabdrucke........................................................................................................................8 Online-Ausgaben.................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • A Revolution That Has Not Happened: the Potential of the Russian Nationalist Revival
    DOI: 10.12797/9788376389042.05 Joachim Diec Jagiellonian University, Kraków Chapter 4 A Revolution That Has Not Happened: The Potential of the Russian Nationalist Revival Introductory remarks World history abounds with revolutionary political changes. What does not seem important about that topic is the theoretical framework, which allows many scholars to discuss whether a political series of events can be put into the conceptual, systemic framework of “revolution” or not. What is widely accepted among theoreticians is the conviction that a revolution is a radical and anti-systemic political change. The theoretical understanding of revolution is related to the legitimacy of authority. The Weberian tradition includes 3 types of authority: traditional, legal-rational, and charismatic (comp. the critical remarks of Blau, 1963). According to it, a revolution can either violently break the people’s readiness to obey commands of a culturally rooted power or overthrow the old regime by acting according to a new system of laws, which replaces 68 Joachim Diec the previous one without a sense of remorse. The new leaders and their style can often be defined as charismatic but theoretically we can easily think of a new, even more charismatic avant-garde, which steals the show: in revolutions a more radical kind of modernity usually replaces the previous style, which is perceived to be not revolutionary enough. In other words, revolutions undermine the base of all the three types of authority. However, what really matters is the fact that after a revolution one’s smaller or bigger world will never be the same. Revolutions are incongruent with Tancredi’s (a character of Lampedusa’s Leopard) conviction that “For everything to stay the same, everything must change”.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Social-Democracy and Iskra, 1900-1904
    RUSSIAN SOCIAL-DEMOCRACY AND I3KRA, 1900 - 1904 by NORMAN ANDERSON JONES R. S., Kansas State College of Agriculture and Applied Science, 1950 A THESIS submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the de<»ree MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of History, Government, and Philosophy KANSAS STATE COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE AND APPLIED SCIENCE 1952 ii LD; 1 2&1 v> Tf 1952. V 16V TABLE OF CONTENTS Vo C.Z 1 PREFACE ill <v CHAPTER I, INTRODUCTION TO RUSSIAN SOCIAL-DEMOCRACY el Russia and the Narodniki 1 The Emancipation of Labor Group u First Party Congress at Minsk 8 The Young Leaders, Lenin, Martov, and Potresov 10 CHAPTER II. THE FOUNDING OF I3KRA Objectives and Tasks of the Party Organ 16 Iskra and Zarya 19 Early Conflicts Among the Editors of Iskra and Zarya 25 l3kra and Zarya versus "Economism" 36 CHAPTER III. PUBLISHING ISKRA AND ZARYA 55 CHAPTER IV. THE SECOND CONGRESS AND ITS AFTERMATH Pre-Con,";ress Preparations 78 The Congress Meets 83 The Debates and Business of the Congress 87 SUMMARY 101 BIBLIOGRAPHY 102 APPENDIX 105 iii PREFACE The constitutional democracy of the Western World la today ranged a- gainst the political forces of the Soviet Union. The tensions created by the resulting ideological dashes seem to be manifestly increasing rather than abating. Within this world 3cene each man finds it hi3 part to make political and social Judgments whether he is consider! ng the actions of a nation or the personal conduct of one individual. As never before he is confronted with the need for maintaining a scholarly perspective as a requisite for making sound Judgments.
    [Show full text]
  • Withdraw from Mexico!
    May, 1916 15 Cents Review A CRITICAL SURVEY OF INTERNATIONAL SOCIALISM WITHDRAW FROM MEXICO! Dangers of a Citizen Army Is India's Loyalty Forced? Free Speech and the Flag NEW REVIEW PUBLISHING ASSOCIATION 256 Broadway, New York Review Contents, May, 1916 REPRESENTATIVE SOCIALIST OPINIONS PAGE CURRENT AFFAIRS: Leaders 135 Withdraw from Mexico!; The Kaiser's Nationalism; The Teachers Organize; of L. B. Boudin's Congressman London on Immigration. Notes 138 IMMIGRATION PROBLEMS 143 Moses Oppenheimer THE DANGERS OF A CITIZEN ARMY 144 Frank Bohn THE ISSUE IN SCHENECTADY 146 SOCIALISM AND WAR Isaac A. Hourwich COMPANY OWNED TOWNS IN CALI- FORNIA 148 Austin Lewis INDIANS FORCED LOYALTY 149 Eugene V. Debs—Boudin's Socialism and War is a masterly re- Laj pat Rai HYPHENATED POETS 151 view and summing up of the war from a Socialist viewpoint and Ernest A. Boyd deserves the widest possible reading and circulation. THE THIRD INTERNATIONALE 153 FREE SPEECH AND FLAG IDOLATRY 155 Theodore Schroeder Joshua Wanhope—Boudin's work is well worthy the attention of FICTION STANDARDS-^OLD AND NEW 157 Mary S. Oppenheimer every careful student of the problems raised by the war. BETWEEN THE LINES 159 Richard Perin Appleton THE PLAYS 161 A. M. Simons—It is the only war book by an American Socialist The German Way; Erdgeist; that has added anything to the Socialist view of the war. Justice. BOOK REVIEWS 162 "The Sorrows of Belgium"; A Big Novel in a Bigger Bun- Austin Lewis—Boudin's Socialism and War is to a Socialist a dle; Meteorological Magic; In- most striking utterance on the conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • Krasnaya Zvezda”
    Universidade de Sao~ Paulo Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciencias^ Humanas Departamento de Historia´ Programa de Pos-Gradua´ c¸ao~ em Historia´ Economica^ \Krasnaya Zvezda" Uma leitura pol´ıtico-econ^omica da primeira utopia liter´aria sovi´etica Pedro Ramos de Toledo S~ao Paulo 2019 Vers~ao Corrigida Universidade de Sao~ Paulo Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciencias^ Humanas Departamento de Historia´ Programa de Pos-Gradua´ c¸ao~ em Historia´ Economica^ \Krasnaya Zvezda" Uma leitura pol´ıtico-econ^omica da primeira utopia liter´aria sovi´etica Pedro Ramos de Toledo Dissertac¸~ao apresentada ao Programa de P´os- Graduac¸~ao em Hist´oria Econ^omica do Depar- tamento de Hist´oria da Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ci^encias Humanas da Universidade de S~ao Paulo, para obtenc¸~ao do t´ıtulo de Mestre em Hist´oria. Orientador: Prof. Dr. Luiz Bernardo Murtinho Peric´as S~ao Paulo 2019 Vers~ao Corrigida Autorizo a reprodução e divulgação total ou parcial deste trabalho, por qualquer meio convencional ou eletrônico, para fins de estudo e pesquisa, desde que citada a fonte. Catalogação na Publicação Serviço de Biblioteca e Documentação Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas da Universidade de São Paulo Toledo, Pedro T649k "Krasnaya Zvezda": uma leitura político-econômica da primeira utopia literária soviética. / Pedro Toledo ; orientador Luiz Bernardo Pericás. - São Paulo, 2019. 256 f. Dissertação (Mestrado)- Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas da Universidade de São Paulo. Departamento de História. Área de concentração: História Econômica. 1. Revolução Russa. 2. Bolchevismo. 3. Marxismo. 4. Utopia. I. Pericás, Luiz Bernardo, orient.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical History of Socialist University of Sheffield June 1980
    VoLT A Critical History of Socialist Thought In Japan To 1918 John Derek Crump Doctor of Philosophy Centre of Japanese Studies, University of Sheffield June 1980 This study is dedicated to the working class in Japan, in the hope that a day will come when (along with the workers throughout the rest of the world) they will decide to get up off their knees. 1. PREFACE The idea of writing this study came to me a full 10 years ago, when I spoke not a word of Japanese, had never been to Japan, and I knew next to nothing about the country. Over the last 10 years by have walked a long and often hard road, but I have been assisted many people who have given me a helping hand along the way. I should like to thank the staff of the Centre of Japanese in Studies at the University of Sheffield for giving me a grounding Japanese and for putting up with a sometimes difficult undergraduate Healey, student. In particular, I should like to thank Graham who first gave up several hours of his own time to guide me through my (and I stuttering lessons in Japanese who later supervised me when became a postgraduate student). After graduating from Sheffield, I spent the next 2 years at the to Institute of Social Science, University of TUkyo and then returned further the Centre of Japanese Studies, University of Sheffield for a by 3 years. During these periods I lived on scholarships provided the Japanese Ministry of Education and the British Social Science Research Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Marx, Die Russische Revolution Und Ihre Folgen | Adrian Zimmermann
    Marx, die russische Revolution und ihre Folgen Von Adrian Zimmermann Russland war bis in die zweite Hälfte des 19. Jahrhunderts ein rückstän- diger, von einer despotischen Monarchie regierter Agrarstaat. 1848 waren Marx und Engels deshalb überzeugt, dass die demokratische Revolution nur in einem Krieg gegen Russland, den bei den Demokraten verhassten »Gendarmen Europas« siegen könne (Rjasanow 1909, 1–5). Doch gerade seine Rückständigkeit führte zur Niederlage des Zaren- reichs im Krimkrieg (1853–1856). Das Regime begann nun die Moderni- sierung des Riesenreichs unter anderem mit einer Landreform voranzu- treiben. Doch auch nach der sogenannten Abschaffung der Leibeigenschaft 1861 wurden die russischen Bauern und Bäuerinnen keineswegs zu freien Eigentümern. Das Land blieb überwiegend Eigentum adliger Grossgrund- besitzer, des autokratischen Staats und der Kirche. Die russische bäuerliche Landbevölkerung erhielt Nutzungsrechte am Boden, für die sie Grund- zinsen zu entrichten hatte, die bewusst höher lagen als der Bodenertrag. Trotz oder gerade wegen der halbherzigen Reformen wuchs der Zulauf zur revolutionären Bewegung. Diese bestand anfänglich vor allem aus Intel- lektuellen, den Narodniki (›VolkstümlerInnen‹), welche Bildungsarbeit in der überwiegend bäuerlichen Bevölkerung leisteten und gezielte Attentate auf Exponenten der Unterdrückungsapparate verübten. Nun erwarteten Marx und Engels zunehmend den baldigen Ausbruch einer Revolution in Russland. Sie unterhielten rege Kontakte zu den im westeuropäischen Exil lebenden russischen RevolutionärInnen,
    [Show full text]
  • Prof. Stoleshnikov AP Third Edition, Supplemented . 2012
    " Rehabilitation will not" Prof. Stoleshnikov AP Third edition, supplemented . 2012. Instead epigraph : I'm talking about us, the sons of Sinai, About us whose view other heat warmed . Let the Russian people is a different path, Prior to their Slavic cases we do not care We ate their food, but paid with blood. The accounts are kept, but do not let down. We will avenge - flowers in the head their north country. When lacquer wears off test, When the stall red screaming roar , We stand at the grave of birch In honor guard . Jewish poet D. Marques: introduction This book - the accusation. And like any accusation, it is a collection of documents that you have so far been unknown. Because blaming a responsible, all primary sources carefully checked and names are given , both in Russian and English languages. These primary sources for a long time , but only for those who are interested in this issue , known in the West. This book is not a sweeping indictment of all Jews indiscriminately; she blames only international organized Jewry and the part of the Jews, which was involved in his dark deeds. That is a charge of only those Jews who themselves, as they say, “The cat knows whose meat is eaten ." Prof. Stoleshnikov AP Chapter 1. Victor Marsden The first document proving the Jewish nature, established in 1917 by the "Soviet" government had a list of senior officials of the Soviet government, drawn up in 1919 by British journalist of the newspaper “Morning Post " Victor Marsden . Victor Emile Marsden (1866 - October 28 , 1920 ) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victor_E._Marsden Victor Marsden also translated into English and the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion » http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1923_75p._Title_p.-_PSM_-_The_Britons_-Marsden.jpg.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Socialists Around Vpered1
    BORIS SAPIR JEWISH SOCIALISTS AROUND VPERED1 SOCIALIST PROPAGANDA AMONG JEWS AND VPERED The importance of the "Lavrists" or "Vperedovtsy", named after the publication Vpered (Forward) (i873-1877) founded and edited by Peter Lavrovich Lavrov, in the evolution of the socialist ideas and groups in Russia has been recognized by historians from Alphonse Thun to Franco Venturi.2 The journal's role in the dissemination of the socialist credo among Russian Jews has never been seriously disputed, although seldom recorded in concrete terms. Of the leading Lavrists only Nicolas Kuliabko-Koretskii left memoirs.3 But he, as well as Lavrov who compiled an interesting outline of the main phases of the "Narodnichestvo"4 were not exceedingly interested in the Jewish aspect of their oeuvre. They touched this topic only in passing and, if at all, referred to Liberman whose Jewish socialism captivated their imagination. There was no reason for them to indicate and to dwell on the Jewish origin of socialist Jews in their midst who never associated themselves with any Jewish cause or aspirations. The outsiders who did so many years afterwards, knew too little about the internal affairs of Vpered and, therefore, either exaggerated its influence among Jews or underestimated the importance of leading Jewish Lavrists or, which 1 With slight changes this paper was read at the YIVO Research Conference on Jewish participation in movements devoted to the cause of social progress, New York, September 10-13, '964. 1 A. Thun, Geschichte der revolutionaren Bewegung in Russland, Leipzig 1883; F. Venturi, Roots of Revolution, London i960. The reader of this journal may find a condensed treatment of the position and influence of Vpered in Boris Sapir, Unknown Chapters in the history of Vpered, in: International Review of Social History, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Sozialreformismus Und Radikale Gesellschaftliche Transformation Historische Debatten in Der Sozialdemokratie in Deutschland Und Russland
    Sozialreformismus und radikale gesellschaftliche Transformation Historische Debatten in der Sozialdemokratie in Deutschland und Russland Herausgegeben von Rudolf Traub-Merz РОССПЭН Москва 2015 УДК 94(100)"654" ББК 66.1(0) Das Buch wurde mit der Unterstützung der Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (Filiale in der Russischen Föderation) herausgegeben Sozialreformismus und radikale gesellschaftliche Transfor­ mation – Historische Debatten in der Sozialdemokratie in Deutschland und Russland / Hrsg. von Rudolf Traub-Merz. MOSKAU: Politische Enzyklopädie, 2015. ISBN 978-5-8243-1950-7 Der Sammelband fasst zentrale Beiträge einer internationalen Konferenz zum Thema „Reform oder Revolution? Die russische und deut- sche Sozialdemokratie und Herausforderungen des 20. Jahrhunderts“ zu- sammen. Die Konferenz wurde gemeinsam vom Russischen Staatsarchiv für sozialpolitische Geschichte (RGASPI), der Russischen Vereinigung für Politikwissenschaft (RAPN) und dem Moskauer Büro der Friedrich- Ebert-Stiftung im November 2013 durchgeführt. Anlass waren wichtige Gründungsjubiläen: 150 Jahre deutsche Sozialdemokratie (1863) und 130 Jahre russische Sozialdemokratie (1883). In ihren Beiträgen beleuchten Historiker, Soziologen und Polito- logen aus Russland und Deutschland die Sonderstellung der deut- schen Sozialdemokratie, ihren Einfluss auf die Entwicklung der rus- sischen Sozialdemokratie, die prägenden sozialen Herausforderungen des Industriezeitalters und die Aktualität politischer Antworten der Sozialdemokratie. Die Publikation erscheint in russischer und in deutscher Sprache. Der Sammelband richtet sich an Wissenschaftler und an Leser, die sich für die sozialen Kämpfe, in denen sich moderne Gesellschaften formierten, und für die Entstehung und den politischen Einfluss der Sozialdemokratie interessieren. УДК 94(100)"654" ББК 66.1(0) ISBN 978-5-8243-1950-7 © Autorenkollektiv, 2015 © Politische Enzyklopädie, 2015 GlieDeRunG Vorwort . .5 Reform und Revolution in der deutschen Sozialdemokratie – Anmerkungen zu ihrer Geschichte Rudolf Traub-Merz .
    [Show full text]