NTS Total Election Reporting and Certification System - Condensed Recanvass Report
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Picking the Vice President
Picking the Vice President Elaine C. Kamarck Brookings Institution Press Washington, D.C. Contents Introduction 4 1 The Balancing Model 6 The Vice Presidency as an “Arranged Marriage” 2 Breaking the Mold 14 From Arranged Marriages to Love Matches 3 The Partnership Model in Action 20 Al Gore Dick Cheney Joe Biden 4 Conclusion 33 Copyright 36 Introduction Throughout history, the vice president has been a pretty forlorn character, not unlike the fictional vice president Julia Louis-Dreyfus plays in the HBO seriesVEEP . In the first episode, Vice President Selina Meyer keeps asking her secretary whether the president has called. He hasn’t. She then walks into a U.S. senator’s office and asks of her old colleague, “What have I been missing here?” Without looking up from her computer, the senator responds, “Power.” Until recently, vice presidents were not very interesting nor was the relationship between presidents and their vice presidents very consequential—and for good reason. Historically, vice presidents have been understudies, have often been disliked or even despised by the president they served, and have been used by political parties, derided by journalists, and ridiculed by the public. The job of vice president has been so peripheral that VPs themselves have even made fun of the office. That’s because from the beginning of the nineteenth century until the last decade of the twentieth century, most vice presidents were chosen to “balance” the ticket. The balance in question could be geographic—a northern presidential candidate like John F. Kennedy of Massachusetts picked a southerner like Lyndon B. -
School Election Results
PRESIDENTIAL PREFERENCE PRIMARY ELECTION MOCK SCHOOL ELECTION CONDUCTED BY THE FLAGLER COUNTY ELECTIONS OFFICE ELECTION RESULTS BY SCHOOL CUMULATIVE ELECTION RESULTS PPP Mock Election - FPC Results County Wide School Election Results United States President (Vote For One) United States President (Vote For One) Name Votes Pct Name Votes Pct Ron Paul 102 37.50% Mitt Romney 366 27.51% Mitt Romney 47 17.28% Ron Paul 319 23.98% Herman Cain 31 11.40% Rick Santorum 211 15.86% Newt Gingrich 25 9.19% Newt Gingrich 171 12.85% Michele Bachmann 24 8.82% Herman Cain 112 8.42% Rick Santorum 19 6.99% Michele Bachmann 93 6.99% Jon Huntsman 11 4.04% Rick Perry 36 2.70% Rick Perry 9 3.31% Jon Huntsman 17 1.27% Gary Johnson 4 1.47% Gary Johnson 11 0.82% Total Votes: 272 Total Votes From All Schools: 1330 PPP Mock Election - MHS Results United States President (Vote For One) Mitt Romney Name Votes Pct Ron Paul Mitt Romney 85 22.43% Rick Santorum Ron Paul 79 20.84% Newt Gingrich Herman Cain 67 17.68% Michele Bachmann 57 15.04% Herman Cain Rick Santorum 31 8.18% Michele Bachmann Newt Gingrich 30 7.92% Rick Perry Rick Perry 20 5.28% Jon Huntsman Jon Huntsman 5 1.32% Gary Johnson 5 1.32% Gary Johnson Total Votes: 379 PPP Mock Election - BTMS Results United States President (Vote For One) Name Votes Pct Mitt Romney 219 35.78% Rick Santorum 145 23.69% Newt Gingrich 107 17.48% Ron Paul 107 17.48% Herman Cain 13 2.12% Michele Bachmann 12 1.96% Rick Perry 7 1.14% Jon Huntsman 1 0.16% Gary Johnson 1 0.16% Total Votes: 612 PPP Mock Election - ITMS Results United States President (Vote For One) Name Votes Pct Ron Paul 31 46.27% Mitt Romney 18 26.87% Newt Gingrich 9 13.43% Rick Santorum 7 10.45% Herman Cain 1 1.49% Gary Johnson 1 1.49% Michele Bachmann 0 0% Jon Huntsman 0 0% Rick Perry 0 0% Total Votes: 67. -
A History of Maryland's Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016
A History of Maryland’s Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016 A History of Maryland’s Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016 Published by: Maryland State Board of Elections Linda H. Lamone, Administrator Project Coordinator: Jared DeMarinis, Director Division of Candidacy and Campaign Finance Published: October 2016 Table of Contents Preface 5 The Electoral College – Introduction 7 Meeting of February 4, 1789 19 Meeting of December 5, 1792 22 Meeting of December 7, 1796 24 Meeting of December 3, 1800 27 Meeting of December 5, 1804 30 Meeting of December 7, 1808 31 Meeting of December 2, 1812 33 Meeting of December 4, 1816 35 Meeting of December 6, 1820 36 Meeting of December 1, 1824 39 Meeting of December 3, 1828 41 Meeting of December 5, 1832 43 Meeting of December 7, 1836 46 Meeting of December 2, 1840 49 Meeting of December 4, 1844 52 Meeting of December 6, 1848 53 Meeting of December 1, 1852 55 Meeting of December 3, 1856 57 Meeting of December 5, 1860 60 Meeting of December 7, 1864 62 Meeting of December 2, 1868 65 Meeting of December 4, 1872 66 Meeting of December 6, 1876 68 Meeting of December 1, 1880 70 Meeting of December 3, 1884 71 Page | 2 Meeting of January 14, 1889 74 Meeting of January 9, 1893 75 Meeting of January 11, 1897 77 Meeting of January 14, 1901 79 Meeting of January 9, 1905 80 Meeting of January 11, 1909 83 Meeting of January 13, 1913 85 Meeting of January 8, 1917 87 Meeting of January 10, 1921 88 Meeting of January 12, 1925 90 Meeting of January 2, 1929 91 Meeting of January 4, 1933 93 Meeting of December 14, 1936 -
10 the Fog of Freedom
10 The Fog of Freedom Christopher M. Kelty Talk of freedom and liberty pervade the past and present of the digital com- puter and the Internet, from everyday “academic freedom” to the more specific notion of a “freedom to tinker”; from the prestigious Computers, Freedom and Privacy conference to “net neutrality”; from “Internet Free- dom” in North Africa and the Middle East and the Occupy movement in the United States to the famous case of Free Software, which has articulated precise freedoms as well as a legally constituted commons in reusable tech- nologies; from the “FreedomBox” to the Freedom Fone to “Liberté Linux (see figure 10.1).1 What kind of talk is this? Idle chatter? A rhetorical flourish? Serious busi- ness? Or perhaps it is more than talk? Freedom is associated with the digi- tal computer and the Internet to a greater extent than it is to most other technologies. And the digital computer and the Internet are associated with freedom much more than with other ideals, like justice, well-being, health, or happiness. Further, arguments are made just as often that digital com- puters and the Internet restrict rather than enhance freedom, leading to a morass of claims about the powers—good and evil—of these new technolo- gies that drape the globe and permeate our consciousness. There are many ways to dismiss this association as ideology or marketing hype, but there are fewer ways to take it seriously. Careful attention to the history and development of the digital computer and the Internet should be balanced with careful attention to the political theories of freedom and liberty if we want to make sense of the inflated claims associating freedom and computers. -
Conservative Movement
Conservative Movement How did the conservative movement, routed in Barry Goldwater's catastrophic defeat to Lyndon Johnson in the 1964 presidential campaign, return to elect its champion Ronald Reagan just 16 years later? What at first looks like the political comeback of the century becomes, on closer examination, the product of a particular political moment that united an unstable coalition. In the liberal press, conservatives are often portrayed as a monolithic Right Wing. Close up, conservatives are as varied as their counterparts on the Left. Indeed, the circumstances of the late 1980s -- the demise of the Soviet Union, Reagan's legacy, the George H. W. Bush administration -- frayed the coalition of traditional conservatives, libertarian advocates of laissez-faire economics, and Cold War anti- communists first knitted together in the 1950s by William F. Buckley Jr. and the staff of the National Review. The Reagan coalition added to the conservative mix two rather incongruous groups: the religious right, primarily provincial white Protestant fundamentalists and evangelicals from the Sunbelt (defecting from the Democrats since the George Wallace's 1968 presidential campaign); and the neoconservatives, centered in New York and led predominantly by cosmopolitan, secular Jewish intellectuals. Goldwater's campaign in 1964 brought conservatives together for their first national electoral effort since Taft lost the Republican nomination to Eisenhower in 1952. Conservatives shared a distaste for Eisenhower's "modern Republicanism" that largely accepted the welfare state developed by Roosevelt's New Deal and Truman's Fair Deal. Undeterred by Goldwater's defeat, conservative activists regrouped and began developing institutions for the long haul. -
John D. Edwards
John D. Edwards Clive City Council Member John Edwards was first elected in 1995 and has been re-elected for six additional consecutive terms. From 1998 to 2005 and since 2009 he has filled the role of mayor pro- tempore. He has chaired the Personnel Committee since 2018 and its predecessor committees for years prior to that. Before being elected to the City Council he served on the Clive Library Committee and the Clive Active Park Task Force. He twice was elected Chair of the Board of Trustees of the Des Moines Metropolitan Transit Authority, serving in 1997-98 and 2003-04, with tenure on the MTA Board for more than a decade. From 2007 to 2018 he served on the Des Moines Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) and is on the MPO Surface Transportation Program (STP) Funding Subcommittee. He has been a representative to the Metro Advisory Council (MAC) since 2005, was elected chair in 2018, and has been re-elected three times since then. John is Professor of Law, Associate Dean for Information Resources and Technology, and Director of the Law Library at Drake University Law School. He has lived in Clive since 1984, when his position at Drake brought him here. John and his wife Beth Ann have three adult children and four grandchildren. His community activities include: Des Moines Presbytery Pulpit Supply, since 2012. St. John's Lutheran Church, Audio Visual Technician, since 2015. Boy Scouts Troop 208, Committee Chair, 1994-98. Iowa Supreme Court Commission on Planning for the 21st Century, 1995-96. State Law Library Advisory Committee, 1991-92. -
If Not Left-Libertarianism, Then What?
COSMOS + TAXIS If Not Left-Libertarianism, then What? A Fourth Way out of the Dilemma Facing Libertarianism LAURENT DOBUZINSKIS Department of Political Science Simon Fraser University 8888 University Drive Burnaby, B.C. Canada V5A 1S6 Email: [email protected] Web: http://www.sfu.ca/politics/faculty/full-time/laurent_dobuzinskis.html Bio-Sketch: Laurent Dobuzinskis’ research is focused on the history of economic and political thought, with special emphasis on French political economy, the philosophy of the social sciences, and public policy analysis. Abstract: Can the theories and approaches that fall under the more or less overlapping labels “classical liberalism” or “libertarianism” be saved from themselves? By adhering too dogmatically to their principles, libertarians may have painted themselves into a corner. They have generally failed to generate broad political or even intellectual support. Some of the reasons for this isolation include their reluctance to recognize the multiplicity of ways order emerges in different contexts and, more 31 significantly, their unshakable faith in the virtues of free markets renders them somewhat blind to economic inequalities; their strict construction of property rights and profound distrust of state institutions leave them unable to recommend public policies that could alleviate such problems. The doctrine advanced by “left-libertarians” and market socialists address these substantive weaknesses in ways that are examined in detail in this paper. But I argue that these “third way” movements do not stand any better chance than libertari- + TAXIS COSMOS anism tout court to become a viable and powerful political force. The deeply paradoxical character of their ideas would make it very difficult for any party or leader to gain political traction by building an election platform on them. -
Counties C Thru E
Official Results CERTIFICATE OF DETERMINATION AND/OR ··..., .:- " ,, ,.,:- r:- ; c- .... rr -.. , , .. ·--.. - - ·- .. -· . " OFFICIAL CANVASS 7"'7•·· J { ? t. l, • 1.. I.;," I '- STATE OF MICHIGAN } '~ ~ . I -3 } ss [. --- ,.r- . ... .. COUNTY OF CALHOUN } The Board of Canvassers of the County of Calhoun, having Ascertained and Canvassed the Votes of the County of Calhoun. for the said Presidential Primary Election, held on TUESDAY, the TWENTY-EIGHTH day of FEBRUARY 2012. DO HEREBY CERTIFY AND DETERMINE THAT THE FOLLOWING VOTES WERE CAST: That, Michele Bachmann, received 24 (Twenty-four) votes by the Republican Party for the office of President of the United States. These votes were received in the following districts: 6th Congressional District: 1 (One) vote; 7th Congressional District: 23 (Twenty-three) votes. That. Herman Cain, received 25 (Twenty-five) votes by the Republican Party for the office of President of the United States. These votes were received in the following districts: 6th Congressional District: 0 (Zero) votes; 7th Congressional District: 25 (Twenty-five) votes. That, Newt Gingrich, received 1,086 (One thousand, eighty-six) votes by the Republican Party for the office of President of the United States. These votes were received in the following districts: 6th Congressional District: 78 (Seventy-eight) votes; 7th Congressional District: 1,008 (One thousand eight) votes. That, Jon Huntsman, received 14 (Fourteen) votes by the Republican Party for the office of President of the United States. These votes were received in the following districts: 6th Congressional District: 2 (Two) votes; 7th Congressional District: 12 (Twelve) votes. That, Gary Johnson, received 6 (Six) votes by the Republican Party for the office of President of the United States. -
The Sunday Fix for Even More of the Fix Go to Washingtonpost.Com/Thefix
2BLACK A2 DAILY 01-20-08 MD RE A2 BLACK A2 Sunday, January 20, 2008 R The Washington Post ON WASHINGTONPOST.COM The Sunday Fix For even more of the Fix go to washingtonpost.com/thefix CHRIS CILLIZZA AND SHAILAGH MURRAY It’s Never Too Early to Think About No. 2 Here at the Sunday Fix, we’re already looking beyond the nomination fi ghts to the always entertaining vice presidential speculation game. We queried some party strategists for their thoughts on the early front-runners. Here’s their consensus: DEMOCRATS John Edwards Tim Kaine Wesley Clark Tom Daschle Evan Bayh Kathleen Sebelius Tom Vilsack The former senator from The popular Virginia Clark, who ran for presi- He and his political in- The senator from Indiana The two-term Kansas Going into the Iowa cau- North Carolina has done governor was one of the dent in 2004, has been ner circle are extremely is clearly angling for the governor is a rising star cuses, Vilsack was the it once, so most peo- first to endorse Sen. one of the most valu- close to Obama. Daschle No. 2 slot, with his early nationally and is coming leader in the clubhouse ple think he won’t do it Barack Obama (Ill.). able surrogates of Sen. would help Obama ad- endorsement and strong off a successful stint as for vice president if Clin- again. If Edwards stays Kaine comes from a Hillary Rodham Clinton dress questions about advocacy for Clinton. He chairman of the Demo- ton were to win the nom- in through the conven- swing state, is term- (N.Y.). -
The Choice of Running Mate
CBS NEWS POLL For release: Wednesday August 6, 2008 7:00 A.M. VICE PRESIDENTIAL CHOICES July 31 - August 5, 2008 By over two to one, voters say that a candidate’s choice of a running mate won’t matter much when deciding which candidate to support for president. 67% say they will be voting based mostly on the presidential candidates, not on whom those men choose as their vice presidential nominee. But 30% say that the choice of a running mate will have a great deal of influence on their vote -- twice the number who said it would matter in July 2000, before George W. Bush and Al Gore made their choices. RUNNING MATE CHOICE (Among registered voters) Now 7/2000 A great deal of influence on vote 30% 15% Vote based on presidential candidates 67 81 Voters who are still undecided are more apt than those currently favoring Obama or McCain to say the candidates’ choices for vice president will be important to their vote -- 48% say it will influence their vote, 47% say it won’t. Independents (35%) are more likely than Democrats (30%) or Republicans (24%) to say the choice of vice presidential nominee will matter. Moderates are also more likely to say it will influence their vote. RUNNING MATE CHOICE (Among registered voters) Reps Dems Inds A great deal of influence on vote 24% 30% 35% Vote based on presidential candidates 74 68 60 Once the vice presidential nominees are announced, more voters are likely to decide those choices are important, if history is any guide. -
Remarks at a Reception for Senatorial Candidate John Edwards in Raleigh, North Carolina July 30, 1998
Administration of William J. Clinton, 1998 / July 30 1543 preconditions were satisfied, including rec- been out here working to try to improve edu- ognition of the ``Turkish Republic of North- cation and move our country forward, move ern Cyprus'' and the withdrawal of Cyprus' our States forward. application to the European Union. I want to thank Margaret Rose Sanford, Although progress was not possible during Mrs. Terry Sanford, for being here tonight. Ambassador Holbrooke's May visit, he as- Thank you for coming. But most of all, I want sured both parties that the United States to thank John Edwards and his wife and his would remain engaged in the search for a children for this race for the Senate. solution. You know, it's just a common place today Sincerely, that you can't beat a Republican incumbent William J. Clinton running for the Senate because they have all the money, and that's why campaign finance NOTE: Identical letters were sent to Newt Ging- reform never passes, I might add. [Laughter] rich, Speaker of the House of Representatives, And so times are good; people are happy; and Jesse Helms, chairman, Senate Committee on your opponent has money, he's already in; Foreign Relations. therefore, you can't win. And John Edwards said, ``I don't think so. Remarks at a Reception for I think we can do better.'' And I appreciate Senatorial Candidate John Edwards and respect that. I also want to thank them in Raleigh, North Carolina for giving up their anniversary dinner to come here and be with us. -
Generally Recognized Candidate List February 5, 2008 Presidential Primary
GENERALLY RECOGNIZED CANDIDATE LIST FEBRUARY 5, 2008 PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY Joe Biden Democratic Biden for President, Inc. P.O. Box 438 Wilmington, DE 19899 Phone: (302) 574-2008 Website: http://www.joebiden.com/home Hillary Clinton Democratic Hillary Clinton for President 4420 North Fairfax Drive Arlington, VA 22203 Phone: (703) 469-2008 Website: http://www.hillaryclinton.com Chris Dodd Democratic Chris Dodd for President P.O. Box 51882 Washington, DC 20091 Phone: (202) 737-3633 Website: http://chrisdodd.com/home John Edwards Democratic John Edwards for President 410 Market Street, Suite 400 Chapel Hill, NC 27516 Phone: (919) 636-3131 Website: http://www.johnedwards.com Mike Gravel Democratic Mike Gravel for President P.O. Box 948 Arlington, VA 22216-0948 Phone: (703) 243-8303 Website: http://www.gravel2008.us Dennis Kucinich Democratic Kucinich for President 2008 11808 Lorain Avenue Cleveland, OH 44111 Phone: (877) 41-DENNIS Website: http://www.dennis4president.com/home Page 1 of 7 GENERALLY RECOGNIZED CANDIDATE LIST FEBRUARY 5, 2008 PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY Barack Obama Democratic Obama for America P.O. Box 8102 Chicago, IL 60680 Phone: (866) 675-2008 Website: http://www.barackobama.com/ Bill Richardson Democratic National Headquarters - Albuquerque Office 111 Lomas Blvd. NW, Suite 200 Albuquerque, NM 87102 Phone: (505) 828-2455 Website: http://www.richardsonforpresident.com Sam Brownback Republican Brownback for President, Inc. Website: http://www.brownback.com John Cox Republican John Cox for President P.O. Box 5353 Buffalo Grove, IL 60089-5353 Phone: (877) 234-3800 Website: http://www.cox2008.com/cox Rudy Giuliani Republican Rudy Giuliani Presidential Committee, Inc. 295 Greenwich St, #371 New York, NY 10007 Phone: (212) 835-9449 Website: http://www.joinrudy2008.com Mike Huckabee Republican Huckabee for President, Inc.