DOCSLIB.ORG

Prospectus, Offering Prospectus Or Similar Documentation Without the Prior Written Approval of ERM

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Prospectus, Offering Prospectus Or Similar Documentation Without the Prior Written Approval of ERM APPENDIX III COMPETENT PERSON’S REPORT CLIENT PROJECT NAME COMPETENT PERSON REPORT DRAWING DONALDSON STRATIGRAPHIC COLUMN Figure No. PROJECT No. Date DO NOT SCALE THIS DRAWING - USE FIGURED DIMENSIONS ONLY. VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS ON SITE 5-15 ADV-BR-11019 November 2018 – III-78 – APPENDIX III COMPETENT PERSON’S REPORT 6361000N 6363000N 367000E 362000E 363000E 6364000N 364000E 365000E 368000E 366000E 6362000N 150RL 150RL 100RL 100RL 50RL 50RL 0RL 0RL -50RL -50RL -100RL -100RL -150RL -150RL -200RL -200RL -250RL -250RL -300RL -300RL -350RL -350RL -400RL -400RL -450RL -450RL SECTION A - A’ 6362000N 364000E 365000E 6364000N 366000E 6365000N 6363000N – III-79 – – III-79 150RL 150RL PLY LEGEND 100RL 100RL UDA1 GT UDA2 50RL 50RL GU UDB11 GL UDB12 GB UDB21 0RL 0RL FA1A UDB22 FA1B UDC11 FA21 UDC12 -50RL -50RL FA22 UDC21 FB1 UDC22 FB2 LDA11 -100RL -100RL FC1 LDA12 FC2 LDA21 B’ FC3 LDA22 -150RL -150RL A FD1 LDB1 FD2 LDB21 NOA LDB22 -200RL -200RL NOB LDB3 DUA LDC1 DUB LDC2 -250RL -250RL YD LDR BH BBA1 BD BBA2 -300RL -300RL SGA11 BBB1 SGA12 BBB2 B SGA21 BBB3 -350RL -350RL A SGA22 BBC1 ’ SGA3 BBC2 SGA4 BBLA1 -400RL -400RL SGB1 BBLA2 SGB2 BBLB1 SGB3 BBLB2 -450RL -450RL SGC1 ASA1 SGC2 ASA2 Sections are Vertically exaggerated at 3:1 for illustrative purposes SGC3 ASB11 UBA1 ASB12 SECTION B - B’ UBA2 ASB21 UBB1 ASB22 UBB2 ASB3 UBC ASC1 LBA11 ASC2 LBA12 SDA LBA2 SDB LBB1 RAA1 LBB2 RAA2 LBC RAB1 BEA RAB2 BEB1 RAB3 BEB2 RAC SECTION LOCATIONS BEC RAD CLIENT PROJECT NAME COMPETENT PERSON REPORT DRAWING Topography DONALDSON TYPICAL CROSS SECTIONS Base of Weathering FIGURE No. PROJECT No. Date 5-16 ADV-BR-11019 November 2018 APPENDIX III COMPETENT PERSON’S REPORT 5.7 Middlemount Regional Geology The Middlemount deposit is located in the central region of the Bowen Basin which covers an area of approximately 200,000 sq.km, Figure 2.3. The Basin consists of a sedimentary sequence of Permo-Triassic clastic sediments with a maximum thickness of 9,000m which are divided into number of tectonic units comprising north north-west to south south-east trending platforms or shelves that are, separated by sedimentary troughs. Regionally, the stratigraphic sequence consists of the Permo-Triassic sediments, overlain by a thin covering of unconsolidated Quaternary alluvium and colluvium, poorly consolidated Tertiary. The Permian Blackwater Group coal measures and associated over- and interburden are located below the Triassic strata and overly the Back Creek Group, the basement. Local Geology The Middlemount resource contains the coal seams of the Rangal Coal Measures and Burngrove Formation of the Blackwater Group. The target seams within the resource consist of the Roper, Middlemount, Tralee and Pisces Upper seams (in descending order) which belong to the Rangal Coal Measures, while the Pisces Lower and Girrah seams belong to the Burngrove Formation and are not considered to have economic potential based on current studies. Overlying the Rangal Coal Measures are alluvial sediments, inferred to be Tertiary in age, with a thickness of up to 30m. The depth of weathering averages 45m, ranging from 20m in the southeast to over 60m in the central and northern areas of ML70379. The Middlemount and Pisces seams have been subjected to the majority of the exploration mining works. The Middlemount seam averages 4.0m thick in the area west of the Jellinbah Fault, ranging from less than 2 to over 7 m. The Middlemount Upper working section is a high ash section that is present over most of the Middlemount area – the exception is in the north, where it is less than 0.3m thick. The top section of the Middlemount Lower Section is predominantly dull with some bright banded coal with an average raw coal CSN average of 1 to 1.5. The base section of the Middlemount seam has more bright coal than the top section and the average raw coal CSN is 4 to 5. The Tralee seam underlies the Middlemount seam. At Middlemount, it ranges in thickness from 0.5 to 1.0m when it occurs just below the Middlemount seam (within 10m). The Tralee seam is divided into three working sections (TL1, TL2T and TL2B, top down) and similar to the Middlemount Lower seam the working section division is predominantly based on coal brightness. Where the seam splits further from the Middlemount seam, the Tralee seam thins to usually less than 0.3m. The Pisces Upper seam averages 4.8m thick in the area west of the Jellinbah fault, ranging from 2 to over 6 m. Thickening and thinning of the seams is interpreted to be the result due to the same structural effects as noted for the Middlemount seam, while intersections outside this range were similarly excluded from the coal thickness model. The Pisces Upper seam is divided into three working sections (PUT, PUM and PUB, top down) and similar to the Middlemount Lower seam the working section division is predominantly based on coal brightness. The Middlemount Seam is stratigraphically equivalent to the Leichhardt seam or Elphinstone seam of the Northern Bowen Basin, or the Pollux Seam of the Central and Southern Bowen Basin and the DU and D seam of the south-eastern Bowen Basin at Moura. The Pisces Seam is the stratigraphically equivalent to the Vermont or Hynds Seam of the Northern Bowen Basin and the E seam of the south-eastern Bowen Basin at Moura. The RPM Competent Person is familiar with the characteristics of the Middlemount and Pisces seams throughout the Bowen Basin. – III-80 – APPENDIX III COMPETENT PERSON’S REPORT Figure 5-17 Middlemount Section showing coal seam stratigraphy The potential open cut coal area strikes north-northwest and dips to the east at between 3- and 7-degrees; the deposit is approximately 7km long and 2km wide. The resource is limited to the east by the Jellinbah Fault; a major regional thrust fault which is oriented north-northwest and has displacement greater than 300m. This fault is located close to the boundary of ML70379 and ML 70417. The coal seams of the Rangal Coal Measures crop out to the west of the Jellinbah Fault, where the majority of the coal exploration has been completed. The strata present on the eastern or upthrown side of the Jellinbah Fault are from the Burngrove Formation, which are becoming visible in the highwall of the mining excavation. Figure 5.17 shows a typical long section through the Middlemount resource area. Exploration drilling and mining has identified that the deposit is complicated by localised thickening of seams in the vicinity of faults. Other than the Jellinbah fault, the deposit contains small-scale (<10m) normal and thrust faults, which is evidenced by the thickened and thinned Middlemount and Pisces seam intersections and by the changes in structural elevations between boreholes. – III-81 – APPENDIX III COMPETENT PERSON’S REPORT 6. Data Verification RPM completed a review of the geological and digital data supplied by the Client to ensure that no material data issues could be identified and that there was no cause to consider the data inaccurate or not representative of the underlying exploration results. RPM visited the Assets at HVO/MTW assets in March, 2017 and the reminder of the assets in April 2018 and reviewed the Assets operations. RPM concluded that the geological data was adequately acquired, validated and managed in databases according to a range of good to industry best practices as outlined below. 6.1 HVO / MTW Bore Hole Data Geological data acquisition has been ongoing in the MTW and HVO areas since 1949 when the Joint Coal Board commenced exploration in the MTW area. Exploration activity increased in the late 1960s and 1970s in response to increasing world energy consumption and demand for both thermal and metallurgical coal, with the Howick Mine commencing operations in 1968, closely followed by the Lemington Mine in 1971 and the Hunter Valley No. 1 operation in 1979. Mt Thorley and Warkworth Mines commenced operations in 1981. The long history of HVO has led to the utilisation of a number of different data and planning practices and in particular seam correlations between the Howick, Hunter Valley and Lemington mine sites. During 2007, Minescape software was introduced to HVO as the preferred tool for technical mine planning functions, including geological database and geological modelling. A GDB borehole database called HVO was created from Minex seam interval data, with “stone” used to designate non-coal units within boreholes. Geological data acquired since 2007 was loaded with all detail into the HVO GDB database. It became apparent to the Company’s antecedent (previous owner) that significant proportions of pre 2007 geological data had not been uploaded into GDB and / or was unsuitable for geological model development and could not be easily validated compared to the original primary data. As a result, the Company’s antecedent referred to all exploration data acquired prior to 2007 as legacy data. The Company’s antecedent undertook a project referred to as the ‘Hunter Valley Legacy Data Project’ between mid-2013 and October 2015 whereby all legacy data for HVO was converted from non-digital to digital format, validated and added to the HVO geological database. The MTW operation transitioned to Minescape software in 2006, with all legacy data being validated and uploaded to the GDB database by the end of 2006. RPM considers that the ‘Legacy Data Project’ has achieved a significantly complete geological data set which now can be used with a high level of confidence for geological modelling and Resource estimation. RPM is aware that the Company’s antecedent completed a significant tranche of work in 2015 whereby seam nomenclature and correlation was standardized for the Jerrys Plains and in particular the Vane Subgroup across the Howick, Hunter Valley and Lemington areas.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • REVIEW 11 Ravensworth Rail Unloader Expansion 1
    MACQUARIE GENERATION 2001 REVIEW 11 Ravensworth rail unloader expansion 1 10 Technology upgrade for Liddell 16 Sawmill waste for renewable energy 19 Aussie Climb 2000—an epic fundraiser 20 Gas-fuelled power plant proposed REVIEW 2001 CONTENTS FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE* 4 PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS 5 CHAIRMAN’S REVIEW 6 CHIEF EXECUTIVE’S REPORT 7 FOUNDATIONS FOR THE FUTURE—LIDDELL UPGRADE, RAIL UNLOADER EXPANSION, INDUSTRY ZONE, TOMAGO GAS TURBINE 10 ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE 14 RENEWABLE ENERGY PORTFOLIO—BIOMASS CO-FIRING, HYDROELECTRIC PLANT, WIND POWER STUDIES 16 IN THE COMMUNITY—AUSSIE CLIMB 2000 19 FORESTRY TRIALS, SAFETY WINNERS 20 * Macquarie Generation’s 2001 Financial Statements presented to the New South Wales Parliament are available from the Corporation’s web site or by contacting our Newcastle office. Contact details appear on the back cover of Review 2001. Cover: Water vapour rises from Bayswater Power Station’s cooling towers. 11 Ravensworth rail unloader expansion 1 10 Technology upgrade for Liddell 16 Sawmill waste for renewable energy 19 Aussie Climb 2000—an epic fundraiser 20 Gas-fuelled power plant proposed REVIEW 2001 CONTENTS FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE* 4 PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS 5 CHAIRMAN’S REVIEW 6 CHIEF EXECUTIVE’S REPORT 7 FOUNDATIONS FOR THE FUTURE—LIDDELL UPGRADE, RAIL UNLOADER EXPANSION, INDUSTRY ZONE, TOMAGO GAS TURBINE 10 ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE 14 RENEWABLE ENERGY PORTFOLIO—BIOMASS CO-FIRING, HYDROELECTRIC PLANT, WIND POWER STUDIES 16 IN THE COMMUNITY—AUSSIE CLIMB 2000 19 FORESTRY TRIALS, SAFETY WINNERS 20 * Macquarie Generation’s 2001 Financial Statements presented to the New South Wales Parliament are available from the Corporation’s web site or by contacting our Newcastle office. Contact details appear on the back cover of Review 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Hunter Country Destinations Management Plan - October 2013
    Destination Management Plan October 2013 Upper Hunter Country Destinations Management Plan - October 2013 Cover photograph: Hay on the Golden Highway This page - top: James Estate lookout; bottom: Kangaroo at Two Rivers Wines 2 Contents Executive Summary . .2 Destination Analysis . .3 Key Products and Experiences . .3 Key Markets . .3 Destination Direction . .4 Destination Requirements . .4 1. Destination Analysis . .4 1.1. Key Destination Footprint . .5 1.2. Key Stakeholders . .5 1.3. Key Data and Documents . .5 1.4. Key Products and Experiences . .7 Nature Tourism and Outdoor Recreation . .7 Horse Country . .8 Festivals and Events . .9 Wine and Food . .10 Drives, Walks, and Trails . .11 Arts, Culture and Heritage . .12 Inland Adventure Trail . .13 1.5. Key Markets . .13 1.5.1. Visitors . .14 1.5.2. Accommodation Market . .14 1.5.3. Market Growth Potential . .15 1.6. Visitor Strengths . .16 Location . .16 Environment . .16 Rural Experience . .16 Equine Industry . .17 Energy Industry . .17 1.7. Key Infrastructure . .18 1.8. Key Imagery . .19 1.9. Key Communications . .19 1.9.1. Communication Potential . .21 2. Destination Direction . .22 2.1. Focus . .22 2.2. Vision . .22 2.3. Mission . .22 2.4. Goals . .22 2.5. Action Plan . .24 3. Destination Requirements . .28 3.1. Ten Points of Collaboration . .28 1 Upper Hunter Country Destinations Management Plan - October 2013 Executive Summary The Upper Hunter is a sub-region of the Hunter Develop a sustainable and diverse Visitor region of NSW and is located half way between Economy with investment and employment Newcastle and Tamworth. opportunities specifi c to the area’s Visitor Economy Strengths.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Variability and Water Security for Power Generation
    Hydro-climatology: Variability and change (Proceedings of symposium JH02 held during 233 IUGG2011 in Melbourne, Australia, July 2011) (IAHS Publ. 344, 2011). Climate variability and water security for power generation ADAM M. WYATT & STEWART W. FRANKS University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales 2308, Australia [email protected] Abstract A reliable supply of fresh water is a critical component of coal fired power generation. During periods when water supplies are reduced, power generation may be limited, with obvious impacts on power consumers. Using the reconstructed historical streamflow series contained in the IQQM water allocation model, and simple water balance modelling, the water supply security of the Bayswater Power Station in the Hunter Valley, Australia, is assessed. The study revealed that the supply of water to the Bayswater Power Station is sensitive to extended dry periods, with some historical periods experiencing water shortfalls so severe that the station would be shut down without alternative water supplies. Key words climate variability; water supply security; water balance modelling; IQQM; Hunter Valley, Australia INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study is to determine the impact that climate processes such as the El Nino – Southern Oscillation have on the reliability of the water supply within the Hunter Valley, Australia. Specifically this study focuses on the water supply security necessary for power generation by Macquarie Generation at the Bayswater and Lake Liddell power stations. The generation of electricity using coal fired power stations such as Bayswater and Lake Liddell is dependent on a reliable supply of fresh water to replenish losses due to the operations of the power stations.
    [Show full text]
  • Model Bush Fire Risk Management Plan 2006
    Page 2 of 41 Amendment List Amendment Entered Number Date Signature Date Page 4 of 41 Table of Contents Glossary 7 1.1 Background 9 1.2 Aim and Objectives 9 1.3 Description of the Muswellbrook BFMC area 10 1.3.1 Location and land tenure 10 1.3.2 Climate and bush fire season 10 1.3.3 Population and demographic information 11 1.3.4 History of bush fire frequency and ignition cause 11 Chapter 2. Identifying and assessing the bush fire risk 13 2.1 Process 13 2.2 Communication and consultation 13 2.3 Identifying the bush fire risk 14 2.3.1 Assets 14 2.3.2 Assessing the bush fire risk - consequence 15 2.3.3 Assessing the bush fire risk - likelihood 17 2.3.4 Identifying the level of risk 17 2.3.5 Evaluating the bush fire risk 17 2.3.6 Prioritising treatments 17 2.3.7 Risk acceptability 17 Chapter 3. Treating the risk 18 3.1 Bush Fire Management Zones 18 3.2 BFMC wide treatments 20 3.3 Asset specific treatments 22 3.4 Fire thresholds 23 3.5 Annual works programs 24 3.6 Implementation 24 Chapter 4. Performance monitoring and reviewing 25 4.1 Review 25 4.2 Monitoring 25 4.3 Reporting 25 4.4 Performance Measurements 25 Appendix 1: Community Participation Strategy 26 Appendix 2: Asset Register 32 Appendix 3: Treatment Register 36 Appendix 4: Maps 41 Page 5 of 41 List of Tables Table 1.1 Land tenure 10 Table 3.1 Bush Fire Management Zones: Purpose, objectives and characteristics 19 Table 3.2 Asset specific treatments used in the Muswellbrook BFMC area 22 Table 3.3 Fire Thresholds for Vegetation Categories 23 List of Figures Figure 2.1 Overview of the risk assessment process ..............................................................................13 Page 6 of 41 Glossary Assets: anything valued by the community which includes houses, crops, livestock, heritage buildings and places, infrastructure, the environment, businesses, and forests, that may be at risk from bush fire.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Fish Communities of the Hunter, Manning, Karuah and Macquarie-Tuggerah Catchments: a 2004 Status Report
    Freshwater fish communities of the Hunter, Manning, Karuah and Macquarie-Tuggerah catchments: a 2004 status report Timothy Howell Bob Creese Industry & Investment NSW Port Stephens Fisheries Institute Private Bag 1, Nelson Bay NSW, 2315 Australia Hunter - Central Rivers CMA Project No. CRH0012 August 2010 Industry & Investment NSW Fisheries Final Report Series No. 126 ISSN 1837-2112 Freshwater fish communities of the Hunter, Manning, Karuah and Macquarie-Tuggerah catchments: a 2004 status report August 2010 Authors: Timothy D. Howell and Robert G. Creese Published By: Industry & Investment NSW (now incorporating NSW Fisheries) Postal Address: Cronulla Fisheries Research Centre of Excellence, PO Box 21, Cronulla, NSW Internet: www.industry.nsw.gov.au © Industry & Investment NSW This work is copyright. Except as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part of this reproduction may be reproduced by any process, electronic or otherwise, without the specific written permission of the copyright owners. Neither may information be stored electronically in any form whatsoever without such permission. DISCLAIMER The publishers do not warrant that the information in this report is free from errors or omissions. The publishers do not accept any form of liability, be it contractual, tortuous or otherwise, for the contents of this report for any consequences arising from its use or any reliance placed on it. The information, opinions and advice contained in this report may not relate to, or be relevant to, a reader’s particular circumstance. Cover photos: Timothy Howell. Main photo: Williams River near Salisbury. Fish photos (clockwise): eel-tailed catfish, empire gudgeon, Australian bass, Cox’s gudgeon, common galaxias, long-finned eel, gambusia, goldfish, common carp, bullrout.
    [Show full text]
  • HVO North Environmental Impact
    HUNTER VALLEY OPERATIONS West Pit Extension and Minor Modifications environmental impact statement figures 4 October 2003 Hunter Valley Operations Prepared by West Pit Extension and Minor Modifications Environmental Resources Management Australia Pty Ltd Building C, 33 Saunders Street, Pyrmont New South Wales 2009 Australia Environmental Impact Statement Figures Locked Bag 24 Broadway New South Wales 2007 for Australia Coal & Allied Operations Telephone 02 8584 8888 Facsimile 02 8584 8800 Web www.erm.com October 2003 ISBN 1-875673-08-3 Hunter Valley Operations West Pit Extension and Minor Modifications Volume 1 Environmental Impact Statement (Part A-E) Volume 2 Technical Reports (Part F-H) Volume 3 Technical Reports (Part I-L) Volume 4 Environmental Impact Statement Figures environmental impact statement FIGURE LIST HUNTER VALLEY OPERATIONS West Pit Extension and Minor Modifications 1 location of HVO and west pit in their regional setting 2 location of HVO and west pit in their local setting 3 flowchart of existing operations 4 approved coal movements 5 overview of existing approvals with proposed west pit extension 6 flowchart of proposed operations 7 mine plan year 1 8 mine plan year 3 9 mine plan year 8 10 mine plan year 14 11 mine plan year 20 12 proposed coal movements 13 proposed haulage routes 14 generalised schematic of west pit mine water management system 15 generalised schematic of HVO north mine water management system 16 short term vegetation types - year 10 17 medium term vegetation types - year 20 18 long term vegetation
    [Show full text]
  • VH-MDX Meteorological Conditions
    VH-MDX Meteorological Conditions Analysis aiding the search for missing aircraft VH-MDX Version: 2nd Edition, October 2015 1st Edition, May 2014 Glenn Strkalj © Glenn Strkalj 2014-2015 Distribution: Public Copyright and distribution of this document Distribution of this document is only authorised by the author. Distribution of this document to an individual or an organisation does not allow that individual or organisation to further distribute this document at own discretion. Provisions of the Copyright Act 1968 apply to this document. Document purpose This document was drafted to support VH-MDX search related operations. The contents of this document are purely intended to clarify accident events to the best of the author’s ability to offer a solid base in determining the location of VH-MDX. This document must not be used for any purpose other than to provide guidance in locating VH-MDX. The information and data presented in this document must not be used for any legal purpose, as the content may be inaccurate or subject to interpretation errors of the author. Acknowledgement Many people have provided significant assistance to the author in producing this and other VH-MDX research documents. Most individuals have requested anonymity and the author would like to thank these people for their important input. Special thanks go to the National Archives of Australia and the Airways Museum and Civil Aviation Historical Society for their fantastic support. 2 © Glenn Strkalj 2014-2015 © Glenn Strkalj 2014-2015 This reference paper will be subject to change as new information and data is found or errors corrected; it is a ‘living’ document.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Regional Development and Innovation
    Sustainable Regional Development and Innovation Karel Grezl BMet (Hons 1), ME, LLB Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy March 2007 I hereby certify that the work embodied in this thesis is the result of original research and has not been submitted for a higher degree to any other University or Institution. (Signed): ……………………………………… Table of Contents Page Abstract 4 1.0 Introduction 6 2.0 Literature Reviews 7 2.1 Sustainable regional development 7 2.2 Sustainability and sustainable development 16 2.3 Regions and regional development 29 2.4 Innovation 51 2.5 Literature reviews reveal conceptual inadequacies 62 2.6 Rationale for use and selection of regional case studies 63 3.0 Regional Case Studies 65 3.1 Italy’s regions 66 3.2 The UK’s regions 90 3.3 The Nelson Region of New Zealand 122 3.4 The Hunter Region of New South Wales, Australia 149 3.5 Synthesis 169 4.0 Discussion 175 4.1 Proving the thesis - not possible with current understanding 175 4.1.1 Breaking through: normative treatment of sustainability plus The Innovation Opportunity 176 4.1.1.1 Sustainable regional development explored 177 4.1.1.1.1 The chasm between ideals and metrics 178 4.1.1.1.2 The dilemma of regional boundaries 188 4.1.1.1.3 Informal economies usually ignored 193 4.1.1.1.4 Sustainable regional development explained 196 4.1.1.1.5 Rationale for inquiring further into innovation 197 4.1.1.2 Innovation revisited 198 4.1.1.2.1 Creativity acknowledged but necessarily ignored 198 4.1.1.2.2 Innovation mechanism mostly unknown 198 4.1.1.2.3 Philosophical
    [Show full text]
  • Coal-Faced Exposing AGL As Australia’S Biggest Climate Polluter Disclaimer
    Coal-faced Exposing AGL as Australia’s biggest climate polluter Disclaimer While this report does not suggest any illegal conduct on the part of any of the individuals or organisations named, it shows that AGL is currently using its position and power to slow the transition to a low carbon economy which is jeopardising both human and planetary health, and it presents alternative approaches that would allow AGL to transition from Australia’s biggest polluter to a green energy leader. Acknowledgments Greenpeace Australia Pacific Limited acknowledges the Traditional Owners of Country throughout Australia and recognises their continuing connection to land, waters, and culture. We pay our respects to their Elders past, present and emerging. Lead author Drew Rooke Design Shaya Made May 2021 Authorised by Kate Smolski Greenpeace Australia Pacific Limited, Sydney www.greenpeace.org.au 2 Coal-faced Exposing AGL as Australia’s biggest climate polluter image: cover Front © Monika Wisniewska / Shutterstock image: Inner cover © Jaz Kaelin / Greenpeace Table of Contents Executive Summary.....................................................5 Introduction................................................................9 1. Australia’s dirtiest company.....................................10 1.1. A snapshot of the Australian electricity sector.....10 1.2. Who is AGL?....................................................11 1.3. Committed to coal............................................12 1.4. A new commitment..........................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Bayswater I . Power Station: I Environmental Impact 1 Assessment I I I I I I I
    I SE R/ NSWSPCC PR 0/79 I I e STATE POLLUTION CONTROL COMMISSION I I I I Proposed Bayswater I . Power Station: I Environmental Impact 1 Assessment I I I I I I I Issued under the authority of I THE HON PAUL LANDA LL B, M LC , Minister for Planning and Environment I I I PROPOSED BAYSWATER POWER STATION r ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT [ CONTENTS Page 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 THE PROPOSAL 2 3 SUBMISSIONS AND PUBLIC COMMENT 3 3.1 . Government Authorities 3 3.2 Local Government and Interested Organizations 5 3.3 Private Submissions 6 4 ADEQUACY OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT 8 5 NEED AND ALTERNATIVES 9 r 5.1 Need 9 5.2 Alternatives 9 I 6 .ASSESSMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FROM CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF THE POWER STATION 10 1 6.1 Environmental Factors 10 6 .1.1 Water Quality 10 6 .1. 2 Air Quality 13 ( 6 .1. 3 Noise Emissions 17 6 .1.4 Earthworks and Spoil Disposal 18 L 6 .1. 5 Visual Impact 18 6 .1. 6 Terrestrial Habitats, Flora and Fauna 18 6 .1. 7 Archaeological Sites 19 6 .1. 8 Social Impacts 19 6 .1. 9 Other 20 (i) l I r Page 6.2 Associated Activities 22 6.2.1 Transmission Lines 22 6.2.2 Coal Mines 22 6.2.3 Coal Transportation 23 7 FACTORS PERTINENT TO THE DECISION 25 7.1 Effect on Water Resources of the Hunter Valley 25 7.2 Effect on the Air Quality of the Region 25 7.3 Need for Impact Statements for Transmission Lines and Coal Mines 26 8 CONCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 27 (ii) REPORT ON THE ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT RESULTING FROM THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF BAYSWATER POWER STATION l 1 INTRODUCTION [ An environmental impact statement· and a supplementary information volume dated June 1979 for the construction and operation of the four unit Bayswater Powe r Station has been [ submitted to the Commission by the Electricity Commission of New South Wales .
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Submission to Costs for Remediation of Sites Containing
    167 Parry St, Hamilton East, 2303, NSW www.hcec.org.au [email protected] Legislative Council Public Works Committee NSW Parliament House Macquarie Street Sydney NSW 2000 By email: [email protected] SUPLEMENTARY SUBMISSION TO: Inquiry into the costs for remediation of sites containing coal ash repositories 1 SEPTEMBER 2020 1 Executive Summary Our analysis and investigations undertaken during the delay in the hearings for the inquiry highlight the inadequacy of the current EPA regulation of coal ash dumps, which we demonstrate is causing significant environmental harm and risking human health. We conclude that the NSW Government is liable for considerable decontamination works at the five active power station ash dumps to remedy the ongoing heavy metal pollution when these facilities are decommissioned and must move to substantially reduce the volumes of coal ash, particularly fly ash, from which most of the metal leachate is derived. We believe the costs associated with this liability can be substantially reduced by implementing a suite of policies aimed at proactive coal ash reuse, and the implementation of a Load-Based Licencing fee paid by power station operators who dump coal ash waste. We believe these measures will incentivise the reuse of the legacy of 50 years of coal ash waste dumping in NSW and address the ongoing generation of coal ash waste, which could provide significant regional business and employment opportunities. We estimate the five operating NSW coal-fired power stations collectively generate 4.8 Mt of coal ash waste a year, and dump about 3.8 Mt a year into on-site ash dams, placement areas, or mine voids, which have collectively accumulated about 160 Mt of coal ash.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 HBOC Bird Report
    HUNTER REGION OF NEW SOUTH WALES Annual Bird Report Number 26 (2018) © Produced by Hunter Bird Observers Club Inc The Hunter Bird Observers Club Inc. (HBOC) produces these annual records of the birds of the Hunter Region of NSW. The aims of HBOC are: • To encourage and further the study and conservation of Australian birds and their habitat. • To encourage bird observing as a leisure time activity. HBOC holds monthly meetings with guest speakers on bird related topics, conducts regular surveys within the Hunter Region, and organises mid-week and weekend outings and occasional camps on long weekends. The range of activities is designed to suit beginners and more experienced birdwatchers equally. All members receive a regular newsletter and are able to borrow without charge from a comprehensive range of books and CDs about Australian and world birdlife. Visit www.hboc.org.au for more details. Membership categories are Single, Family and Junior, and applications for membership are welcomed at any time. Copies of this report, at $15.00 each, may be obtained from: The Secretary Hunter Bird Observers Club Inc. P.O. Box 24 New Lambton NSW 2305 Email: [email protected] Front cover: Rainbow Bee-eater (Merops ornatus) by Trevor Murray Back cover: Little Lorikeet (Glossopsitta pusilla) by Dick Jenkin Date of Issue: 31 March 2020 ISSN: 1322-5332 Managing Editor: Dan Williams Design layout: Rob Kyte at Conservation Matters 0420 821460 Citation: Williams, D. (Ed.) (2019). Hunter Region Annual Bird Report Number 26 (2018), Hunter Bird Observers Club Inc., New Lambton, Australia © Hunter Bird Observers Club Inc Financial assistance from Newcastle Coal Infrastructure Group (NCIG) for printing this Report is gratefully acknowledged.
    [Show full text]