The Use of Prosodic Units in Syntactic Decoding
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
DOCUMENT Rmou ED 101 537 FL 004 666 AUTHOR O'Malley, Michael H. TITLE The Use of Prosodic Units in Syntactic Decoding,, PUB DATE 13 Apr 73 NOTE 14p.; Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America (85th, Boston, Massachustitts, April 1973) EDRS PRICE MF-$0.76 HC-$1.58 PLUS POSTAGE DESCRIPTORS Deep Structure; Grammar; Intonation; Language Rhythm; *Linguistic Theory; *Phonological Units; *Phonology; Phrase Structure; *Sentence Structure; Speech; Structural Analysis; Supraragmentals; Surtace Structure; *Syntax IDENTIFIERS *Prosody (Linguistics) ABSTRACT This paper focuses on linguistic prosodic units related to boundaries between syntactic units. Specifically,rules for pfedicting the location of such boundaries, and factorsaffecting their location, are discussed. Examplesare given on how prosodies can be used for syntactic analysis. Addressing the question of prosodic units and their distribUtion, two theories, bothbased on a hierarchy of units, are contrasted. A third theory, suggestedas)a possible basis for further refinement and testing stated as follows: an NP that is not a single unstressedpronoun ends with a phrase- or clause-level boundary; NP's with embedded clauses have boundaries before the clause. A study conducted to test thisrule is described, and several flews in the rule aro pointed out.Areas in the study of prosody that need further researchare pinpointed. (AM) Michael H. O'Malley SUR Note: 80 University of Michigan NIC #16094 Phonetics Laboratory 1079 Frieze Bldg. Ann Arbor 48104 THE USE OF PROSODIC UNITS IN SYNTACTIC DECODING* Michael H. O'Malley 1 This paper is about prosodic information and howinformation might be used to ::: guide the syntactic analysis of spoken utterances. As part of a session devoted CD to linguistic units, it might be appropriate to start bylisting the prosodic g units a particular dialect of AmericanEnglish. Unfortunately, there is LL' no universallyifor agreed upon set ofprosodic units. It is not even clear that prosodic information is organized into categorical units inthe way that phonemes such as p, t, and k seem to be. Disagreements over prosodic units does not imply that prosodies areunimpor- tant. It is olear that the prosodic features of an utterance -its juncture, stress, intonation contour and rhythm - are determinedin part by the grammatical structure of that utterance. In writing, punctuation, function words and inflectional morphemes are all used to signal syntactic structure. In speech, function words and morphemes tend to be unstressed andthus they are less intel- ligible. Greater emphasis must be placed on prosodies in order tosignal the syntactic information. In fact there is evidence that prosodies aresuch good signals of syntactic structure, that on some dimensions,speech can be more syntactically complex than writing. Pragmatics, which is that aspect of an utterance having todo with the speaker's attitude, interest and intention, also determinesprosodic patterns. For example, prosodic features can act tofocus attention on those portions of an utterance which thespeaker thinks of as especially important to his message. The divLsion of an utterance into phonologicalphrases and the placement of accents within those phrases are both functionsof syntax and pragmatics. .141) Unfortunately some additional factors such as nervousness,thought processes and emotions can affect prosodic patterns, orrather, can produce effects, such 411, as hesitation pauses, which areacoustically similar to prosodies. In general, these effects will be treated as noise to be overcomeby a syntactic analysis sydtem. 0 *Presented at the session on LinguisticUnits at the 85th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America in Boston onApril 13, 1973. U S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION II WELOANE NATIONAL INSTITUTE Or tionimrrNOTUCHALIONor t,..,00 Fx.sr ti Y Ac PPCtIVPO t POM 110 Pr PSON OP OPOANI/At ION OPIOIN A 1 ING it POINTS Ot VII:* ok OPINIONS it ,,th IP b bo NOT NI-rtssholl r oraitE 2 SENt 01 1 NIAL rotIoNAt INStitutr of E Our /01W/ Post t ION OP POLK V 2 features of All in all, prosodic patterns areprobably the most prominent produce many of these patterns spoken language. Children learn to understand and segmental phonology. well before they develop asignificant portion of their is usually just Imitation of a language or imitationof a particular speaker imitation of the prosodic patterns which arecharacteristic of that language or the prosodic features may of that individual. Even in a noisy environment, be-understood and used as an aid fordecoding the spoken message. I am sure you have all had theexperience of listening to . barely intelligible conversation, being able to under- at first tuning into theprosodic patterns and only then stand the words. language that It should not be necessary topersuade people in the arm. of importance, until quite recently prosodies are important. But in spite of their the Acoustical only a very small fraction of thework which was reported- at neglect. Prosodies Society dealt with prosodies. There is a good reason for this words. do not behave like other linguisticunits such as phonemes and and phonemes The principle characteristic ofsuch segmental units as words part of a particular utter- is their discreteness. A word either is or is not a Such discrete ance and a phonemeis or is not realized by aparticular segment. As units can he studies by constructingparadigms of contrastive utterances. of one the physical signal is varied acr -iss aunit boundary, the perception utterance versus another switchescategorically. This categorical perception dialect can be taught to means that with onlyminimal training, speakers of a transcribe the words or phonemes in anutterance quite consistently. but in general, Of course there are manyexceptions to what I have said, Such is not the arguments about segmentalphonology are quite well understood. of an utterance are quite case for prosodies. While some prosodic features of a clear, even experienced investigatorswill not agree in all aspects other and they will not agree transcription. They will not agree with each especially with an earlier transcription oftheir own. This disagreement is apparent in the transcriptionof spcntaneous speech. If experienced investi- of the units that they gators disagree about theunits or even the dimensions are studying, it is notsurprising that progress in thefield has been slowed. guide This paper is about how prosodicinformation could be used to is information, while syntactic analysis. this question of how to use prose The fundamental it provides a framework forresearch, is really secondary. questions are: What are the prosodic units? Where do they occur? How reliably do they occur there? And can they be distinguished from each other and from other acoustic events? If these could be answered, then thepractical_problem, of actually using prosodies could be left to the cleverness of a comruter programmer. The parsing strategy that is adopted would dependfirst upon the rules which predict .1 the distribution or occurrence of prosodic elements,second upon the statistical reliabilitof these predictions for a particular type ofspeech and third, the strategy ould depend upon the overall system organization. The focus of this paper is on higher level, linguisticprosodic units - especially those which are related to bound&ries betweensyntactic units. I am primarily concerned with rulesfor predicting the location of these boundaries and with factors which can modify their location. Before discussing prosodic units and theirdistribution, I would like to present two examples of how prosodies might beused for analyzing syntax. Suppose that you had found the following contentwords, as shown in line (1) on the handout. (1) process computing average values used Some of the possible readings for such a string arelisted bolow it along with the prosodic breaks which would be likely to occur. In written English, the begin- nings of units are generally marked by, functionwords, but the ends are difficult to find. In speech, function words areof6n unstressed, but the ends of units seem to be more strongly markedby prosodies. The present example is quite clear. If lines (2) or (3) were the original utterance, wewould all expect a rather well markedboundary after either computing or average -probably a silence interval as well as a fall-rise pitch contour and alengthening of the preceding word. The problem is to make an algorithm which willdetect a boundary where there is one and not have any false alarms elsewherein the sentence. Examples (6) and (7) illustrate one of the most commoncases of ambiguity - a noun phrase followedby a prepositional phrase. The problem is whether the pre- positional phrase modifies the noun it follows or somehigher level structure. In writing, semantics must usually be invoked to resolve theambiguity, but in speech, we might hope for a break between the nounphrase and the prepositional phrasewhen the prepositional phrase does not modify the noun phrase. The 4 presence of such a break might be predicted either by the branching of the surface structure tree or by the fort that the word block ends a noun phrase in case (7) but not in case (6).. If breaks after noun phrases are sufficiently reliable, a left to right parser could use the information provided by the break to close off the noun phrase aad start looking for a new structure. Even statistical tendencies could be used to change the order in which the parser explored alternatives. While ambiguous