DOCSLIB.ORG

ODS Destruction in the United States and Abroad

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ODS Destruction in the United States and Abroad ODS Destruction in the United States and Abroad Prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency by ICF February 2018 EPA 430-R-18-001 Table of Contents Controlled ODS under the Montreal Protocol ........................................................................................... iii Acronyms ............................................................................................................................................... iv 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 1 2. Sources of ODS for Destruction ............................................................................................................ 2 2.1. ODS-Containing Equipment ................................................................................................................. 2 2.2. Bulk ODS ............................................................................................................................................... 3 3. The Process of ODS Destruction: Best Management Practices ............................................................... 4 3.1. Recovery and Collection ....................................................................................................................... 4 3.2. Consolidation and Storage ................................................................................................................... 5 3.3. Transportation ..................................................................................................................................... 6 3.4. Destruction ........................................................................................................................................... 6 4. ODS Destruction Technologies and Facilities in the United States and Worldwide .................................. 8 4.1. Montreal Protocol-Approved ODS Destruction Technologies ............................................................. 8 4.2. ODS Destruction Facilities in the United States ................................................................................. 11 4.3. Capacity of U.S. Destruction Facilities ................................................................................................ 15 4.4. International ODS Destruction Facilities and Technologies ............................................................... 16 5. International Efforts to Destroy ODS .................................................................................................. 18 5.1. United States ...................................................................................................................................... 18 5.1.1. Reported Amount and Type of ODS Destroyed ......................................................................... 18 5.1.2 Reported ODS Imported for Destruction ......................................................................................... 19 5.2. European Union ................................................................................................................................. 20 5.2.1. Reported Amount and Type of ODS Destroyed ......................................................................... 20 5.2.2. Reported ODS Imported for Destruction ................................................................................... 22 5.3. Japan .................................................................................................................................................. 22 5.3.1. Reported Amount and Type of ODS Destroyed ......................................................................... 22 5.3.2. Reported ODS Imported for Destruction ................................................................................... 23 5.4. Destruction of ODS in Article 5 and Non-Article 5 Countries ............................................................. 23 6. Global ODS Recovery, Transportation, and Destruction Costs .............................................................. 24 6.1. ODS Recovery Costs from Products and Equipment .......................................................................... 25 6.2. ODS Transportation Costs .................................................................................................................. 25 6.3. ODS Destruction Costs ....................................................................................................................... 26 6.3.1. Concentrated Sources of ODS .................................................................................................... 26 6.3.2. Dilute Sources of ODS ................................................................................................................ 26 7. Financing of ODS Destruction Projects ................................................................................................ 27 7.1. Producer Responsibility Programs and Taxes .................................................................................... 27 7.2. ODS Destruction Offset Programs ...................................................................................................... 28 7.2.1. Compliance Markets .................................................................................................................. 28 i ODS Destruction in the United States and Abroad 1 February 2018 7.2.2. Voluntary Programs ................................................................................................................... 29 7.2.3. Carbon Prices and Profitability .................................................................................................. 29 7.3. HFC-23 Destruction ............................................................................................................................ 31 7.4. MLF- and GEF-Funded Destruction Projects ...................................................................................... 32 8. Modeled Amounts of ODS Potentially Available for Destruction ......................................................... 32 8.1. ODS Recoverable from Equipment and Products .............................................................................. 32 8.1.1. United States ............................................................................................................................. 33 8.1.2. European Union ......................................................................................................................... 35 8.1.3. Global ......................................................................................................................................... 36 8.2. Availability of Stockpiles ..................................................................................................................... 37 8.2.1. CFCs and HCFCs in Refrigeration/AC Equipment ....................................................................... 37 8.2.2. Halons in Fire Extinguishing Equipment .................................................................................... 37 9. ODS Management Needs for Developing Countries ............................................................................ 38 10. Implications for Addressing HFC Disposal ........................................................................................... 40 10.1. Sources, Practices, Technologies, and Costs: Parallels to ODS ...................................................... 41 10.2. Current and Projected Quantities Available for Destruction ......................................................... 42 11. References ........................................................................................................................................ 45 12. Appendices ....................................................................................................................................... 52 Appendix A: Transboundary Movement of ODS....................................................................................... 52 Appendix B: Resource Conservation and Recovery Act ............................................................................ 53 Code F (Wastes from Non-Specific Sources) ................................................................................................. 54 Code U (Commercial Chemical Products) ...................................................................................................... 54 Code K (Wastes from Specific Sources) ......................................................................................................... 55 Code D (Characteristic Wastes) ..................................................................................................................... 55 The Mixture and Derived-From Rules ............................................................................................................ 55 Appendix C: Description of ODS Destruction Technologies ....................................................................... 57 Incineration Technologies.............................................................................................................................. 57 Non-Incineration Technologies...................................................................................................................... 58 Plasma Technologies ................................................................................................................................ 59 Other Non-Incineration Technologies .....................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Potential for Biofuels Alongside the EU-ETS
    The potential for biofuels alongside the EU-ETS Stefan Boeters, Paul Veenendaal, Nico van Leeuwen and Hugo Rojas-Romagoza CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis Paper for presentation at the Eleventh Annual GTAP Conference ‘Future of Global Economy’, Helsinki, June 12-14, 2008 1 Table of contents Summary 3 1 The potential for biofuels alongside the EU-ETS 6 1.1 Introduction 6 1.2 Climate policy baseline 7 1.3 Promoting the use of biofuels 10 1.4 Increasing transport fuel excises as a policy alternative from the CO 2-emission reduction point of view 22 1.5 Conclusions 23 Appendix A: Characteristics of the WorldScan model and of the baseline scenario 25 A.1 WorldScan 25 A.2 Background scenario 27 A.3 Details of biofuel modelling 28 A.4 Sensitivity analysis with respect to land allocation 35 References 38 2 Summary The potential for biofuels alongside the EU-ETS On its March 2007 summit the European Council agreed to embark on an ambitious policy for energy and climate change that establishes several targets for the year 2020. Amongst others this policy aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by at least 20% compared to 1990 and to ensure that 20% of total energy use comes from renewable sources, partly by increasing the share of biofuels up to at least 10% of total fuel use in transportation. In meeting the 20% reduction ceiling for greenhouse gas emissions the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (EU-ETS) will play a central role as the ‘pricing engine’ for CO 2-emissions. The higher the emissions price will be, the sooner technological emission reduction options will tend to be commercially adopted.
    [Show full text]
  • Dichlorodifluoromethane Dcf
    DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE DCF CAUTIONARY RESPONSE INFORMATION 4. FIRE HAZARDS 7. SHIPPING INFORMATION 4.1 Flash Point: 7.1 Grades of Purity: 99.5% (vol.) Common Synonyms Gas Colorless Faint odor Not flammable 7.2 Storage Temperature: Ambient Arcton 6 4.2 Flammable Limits in Air: Not flammable Eskimon 12 7.3 Inert Atmosphere: No requirement 4.3 Fire Extinguishing Agents: Not F-12 Visible vapor cloud is produced. 7.4 Venting: Safety relief flammable Freon 12 7.5 IMO Pollution Category: Currently not available Frigen 12 4.4 Fire Extinguishing Agents Not to Be Genetron 12 Used: Not flammable 7.6 Ship Type: Currently not available Halon 122 4.5 Special Hazards of Combustion 7.7 Barge Hull Type: 3 Isotron 12 Products: Although nonflammable, Ucon 12 dissociation products generated in a fire may be irritating or toxic. 8. HAZARD CLASSIFICATIONS Notify local health and pollution control agencies. 4.6 Behavior in Fire: Helps extinguish fire. 8.1 49 CFR Category: Nonflammable gas Avoid inhalation. 4.7 Auto Ignition Temperature: Not 8.2 49 CFR Class: 2.2 flammable 8.3 49 CFR Package Group: Not pertinent. Not flammable. 4.8 Electrical Hazards: Not pertinent Fire Cool exposed containers with water. 8.4 Marine Pollutant: No 4.9 Burning Rate: Not flammable 8.5 NFPA Hazard Classification: Not listed 4.10 Adiabatic Flame Temperature: Currently 8.6 EPA Reportable Quantity: 5000 pounds CALL FOR MEDICAL AID. not available Exposure 8.7 EPA Pollution Category: D 4.11 Stoichometric Air to Fuel Ratio: Not VAPOR 8.8 RCRA Waste Number: U075 Not irritating to eyes, nose or throat.
    [Show full text]
  • SAFETY DATA SHEET Halocarbon R-503
    SAFETY DATA SHEET Halocarbon R-503 Section 1. Identification GHS product identifier : Halocarbon R-503 Other means of : Not available. identification Product type : Liquefied gas Product use : Synthetic/Analytical chemistry. SDS # : 007306 Supplier's details : Airgas USA, LLC and its affiliates 259 North Radnor-Chester Road Suite 100 Radnor, PA 19087-5283 1-610-687-5253 24-hour telephone : 1-866-734-3438 Section 2. Hazards identification OSHA/HCS status : This material is considered hazardous by the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200). Classification of the : GASES UNDER PRESSURE - Liquefied gas substance or mixture HAZARDOUS TO THE OZONE LAYER - Category 1 GHS label elements Hazard pictograms : Signal word : Warning Hazard statements : Contains gas under pressure; may explode if heated. May cause frostbite. May displace oxygen and cause rapid suffocation. Harms public health and the environment by destroying ozone in the upper atmosphere. Precautionary statements General : Read and follow all Safety Data Sheets (SDS’S) before use. Read label before use. Keep out of reach of children. If medical advice is needed, have product container or label at hand. Close valve after each use and when empty. Use equipment rated for cylinder pressure. Do not open valve until connected to equipment prepared for use. Use a back flow preventative device in the piping. Use only equipment of compatible materials of construction. Always keep container in upright position. Prevention : Not applicable. Response : Not applicable. Storage : Protect from sunlight. Store in a well-ventilated place. Disposal : Refer to manufacturer or supplier for information on recovery or recycling. Hazards not otherwise : Liquid can cause burns similar to frostbite.
    [Show full text]
  • AN ACT Relating to Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from 1
    H-0017.2 HOUSE BILL 1050 State of Washington 67th Legislature 2021 Regular Session By Representatives Fitzgibbon, Ortiz-Self, Leavitt, Duerr, Chopp, Ramel, Peterson, Goodman, Ryu, Callan, Ramos, Ormsby, Pollet, Stonier, Fey, Macri, and Bergquist Prefiled 12/23/20. Read first time 01/11/21. Referred to Committee on Environment & Energy. 1 AN ACT Relating to reducing greenhouse gas emissions from 2 fluorinated gases; amending RCW 70A.15.6410, 70A.15.6420, 3 70A.15.6430, 70A.45.080, 19.27.580, 70A.15.3150, 70A.15.3160, 4 19.285.040, 19.27A.220, and 39.26.310; reenacting and amending RCW 5 70A.45.010; adding a new chapter to Title 70A RCW; creating a new 6 section; and recodifying RCW 70A.45.080, 70A.15.6410, 70A.15.6420, and 70A.15.6430.7 8 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON: 9 NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. (1) The legislature finds that 10 hydrofluorocarbons are air pollutants that pose significant threats 11 to our environment. Although hydrofluorocarbons currently represent a 12 small proportion of the state's greenhouse gas emissions, emissions 13 of hydrofluorocarbons have been rapidly increasing in the United 14 States and worldwide, and they are hundreds to thousands of times 15 more potent than carbon dioxide. In 2019, the legislature took a 16 significant step towards reducing greenhouse gas emissions from 17 hydrofluorocarbons by transitioning to the use of less damaging 18 hydrofluorocarbons or suitable substitutes in certain new foam, 19 aerosol, and refrigerant uses. However, significant sources of 20 hydrofluorocarbon emissions in Washington remain unaddressed by the 21 2019 legislation, including legacy uses of hydrofluorocarbons as a p.
    [Show full text]
  • Destruction Requirements for State Records, Canceled Checks & Electronic Images
    EXHIBIT H Page 1 of 2 DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND HEALTH SERVICES (DMAHS) MEDICAL ASSISTANCE DISBURSEMENT SERVICES RFP 2012 Destruction Requirements for State Records, Canceled Checks & Electronic Images The NJ Department of State’s Division of Archives and Record Management (NJDARM) is responsible for insuring that all public records are managed, preserved and destroyed in accordance with public law. Destruction of Canceled Checks The bank must destroy all public documents in accordance with state regulations and the retention schedule promulgated by NJDARM in consultation with the appropriate State agency and approved by the State Records Committee (SRC). The records retention schedule for the purposes of this bid is S820300-002-0048-0000: Canceled Checks. Image methodology and system quality control at the bank’s operations are the determinant factor when the SRC establishes the retention period, for the paper checks post imaging, and shall be determined after the awarding of this contact during the imaging certification process, which may include site inspections of both the imaging and destruction facility. The bank should be prepared for the possibility of storing checks for a period of three (3) to nine (9) months. Physical Destruction of Checks, Logs, and Reports Physical destruction of state records must comply with the existing (applicable) state standards as described in State Contract T-0387: Records Removal and Destruction Services. These standards will apply to any sub-contracted vendors the bank may utilize for destruction services. Specifically relating to the destruction of canceled checks; 1. The bank or sub-contractor shall only destroy public records that have been authorized for destruction by the NJDARM through a completed and processed “Request and Authorization for Records Disposal” form.
    [Show full text]
  • JSP 418 Leaflet 6 Fluorinated Greenhouse Gases Version
    Management of Environmental Protection in Leaflet 6 JSP 418 Defence FLUORINATED GREENHOUSE GASES Contents Para 1 Introduction Policies 12 International Policy – The UN Framework Convention on Climate Change 15 European Union Policy 17 UK Government Policy 23 MOD Policy Legislation 25 International legislation 45 UK Legislation Procedures for Implementation of MOD Policy 49 Policy Development and Implementation Management Responsibilities 51 Responsibilities of Users 52 Responsibilities of MOD Re-Supplier (reselling to MOD purchasers) 55 Training 73 Restrictions on New Uses 77 Restrictions on Existing Uses 79 Alternative Substances and Methods 80 Responsible Management 83 Servicing Requirements 86 Reporting Requirements 89 Disposal of Recovered and Unwanted Fluorinated Greenhouse Gases 91 Further Guidance Annexes A Definitions from Regulation (EU) No 517/2014 B Placing on the market prohibitions in accordance with Article 9 of Regulation EC842/2006 C Common and Trade Names of Products That May Contain Fluorinated Greenhouse Gases D Assurance Questions May 2016 Leaflet 6 Page 1 Management of Environmental Protection in Leaflet 6 JSP 418 Defence INTRODUCTION Aim 1. The aim of this leaflet is to deliver MOD policy requirements on the use, containment and recovery of fluorinated greenhouse gases (F gases). It also outlines the latest legislative position and the substances whose use and applications are now prohibited. Scope 2. This leaflet applies to all personnel including Project Team Leaders, Project Sponsors, Equipment, Property and Facilities Managers and others (including Regional Prime Contractors RPCs, Private Partners and other such contractors who operate and use equipment containing fluorinated greenhouse gases. This includes those who take the role of undertakings1 and/or a Responsible Authority2 who manages such undertakings and operate equipment or facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Avoiding Fluorinated Greenhouse Gases Prospects for Phasing Out
    | CLIMATE CHANGE | 08/2011 Avoiding Fluorinated Greenhouse Gases Prospects for Phasing Out | CLIMATE CHANGE | 08/2011 Avoiding Fluorinated Greenhouse Gases Prospects for Phasing Out by Katja Becken Dr. Daniel de Graaf Dr. Cornelia Elsner Gabriele Hoffmann Dr. Franziska Krüger Kerstin Martens Dr. Wolfgang Plehn Dr. Rolf Sartorius German Federal Environment Agency (Umweltbundesamt) UMWELTBUNDESAMT This publication is only available online. It can be downloaded from http://www.uba.de/uba-info-medien-e/3977.html along with a German version. Revised version of the report “Fluorinated Greenhouse Gases in Products and Processes – Technical Climate Protection Measures”, German Federal Environment Agency, Berlin 2004 Translation of the German-language report, November 2010 ISSN 1862-4359 Publisher: Federal Environment Agency (Umweltbundesamt) Wörlitzer Platz 1 06844 Dessau-Roßlau Germany Phone: +49-340-2103-0 Fax: +49-340-2103 2285 Email: [email protected] Internet: http://www.umweltbundesamt.de http://fuer-mensch-und-umwelt.de/ Edited by: Section III 1.4 Substance-related Product Issues Katja Becken, Dr. Wolfgang Plehn Dessau-Roßlau, June 2011 Foreword Fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-gases) are 100 to 24,000 times more harmful to the climate than CO2. The contribution of fluorinated greenhouse gases to global warming is projected to triple from nearly 2% to around 6% of total greenhouse gas emissions by the year 2050. This is revealed by global projections prepared for the Federal Environment Agency in a scenario where no new measures are taken. The need for action is evident. F-gases are mostly used in similar ways to the CFCs and halons used in the past, which are responsible for the destruction of the ozone layer in the stratosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 14: NIGHT of DESTRUCTION September 11
    INSIDE THIS EDITION SEPTEMBER 14 – NIGHT OF DESTRUCTION SEPTEMBER 27 – SUPER SHOE WEEKEND STARTS OCTOBER 26 – AWARDS BANQUET PHOTO MEDLEY – RACING FAMILIES September 11, 2019 SATURDAY SEPTEMBER 14 THE LEGENDARY NIGHT OF DESTRUCTION w SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 14: NIGHT OF DESTRUCTION This Saturday. The Legendary Night of Destruction. We’ve got PROGRAM INFORMATION fan favorites: Monster Trucks . Bus Races . Trailer Races . Spectator Drags . Mini FWD Enduro . Demolition Derby. We Free Bus Rides 5:00 – 7:00 haven’t seen a Jet Car do its thing in years, but you’ll see (and Adults $20 hear) one this year. And then there is the new: Double-decker Youth 6-12 $10 Stacker Cars (first time in Michigan) . Scarecrow World Record Kids 5 & Under FREE Limo Jump plus another new Scarecrow stunt (they are never Program Starts 7:30 PM dull!) Then we close out the night with FIREWORKS!! Family fun awaits. We will see you at the 2019 Night of Destruction. w Clockwise: Monster trucks from a past Night of Destruction; cars with trailers go for the win while going around piles of debris (“ground clutter” as announcer, Jason Seltzer says); Scarecrow flies through several campers at last year’s Night of Destruction; fans watch the action; the Demolition Derby from the Red, White & Boom; the free bus rides are a big hit and the drivers sometimes get a bit competitive with one another; the Zoo Stacker cars will make their first Michigan appearance at this year’s night of Destruction. FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 27 – SUPER SHOE WEEKEND STARTS There were 388 campsites available to reserve in advance for Super Shoe weekend (no need to run in the Footrace!) By publication time for this edition of Track Talk (Tuesday, September 10), there were only 11 of the 388 remaining.
    [Show full text]
  • Paving the Way to Carbon-Neutral Transport: 10-Point Plan To
    Paving the way to carbon-neutral transport 10-point plan to help implement the European Green Deal January 2020 CONTEXT The transport sector is responsible for 22.3% of total EU greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, with road transport representing 21.1% of total emissions. Breaking this down further, passenger cars account for 12.8% of Europe’s emissions, vans for 2.5%, while heavy-duty trucks and buses are responsible for 5.6%. Transport is therefore a key focus and driver for climate protection measures. The European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association (ACEA) strongly believes that carbon-neutral road transport is possible by 2050. This however will represent a seismic shift, requiring a holistic approach with increasing efforts from all stakeholders. * All CO2 equivalent ** Industry = ‘Manufacturing industries and construction’ + ‘Industrial processes and product use’ Source: European Environment Agency (EEA) AUTO INDUSTRY CONTRIBUTION Investing €57.4 billion in R&D annually, the automotive sector is Europe's largest private contributor to innovation, accounting for 28% of total EU spending. Much of this investment is dedicated to clean mobility solutions. The automobile industry embraces the Paris Agreement and its goals. Manufacturers also support the climate protection initiatives of the European Commission, such as the ‘Clean Planet for All’ strategy, provided all stakeholders contribute their share and the achievements to date are taken into account. ACEA’s 10-point plan to help implement the European Green Deal – January 2020 1 ACEA members are fully committed to deliver the ambitious 025 and 030 C2 reduction targets. In order to provide legal certainty for the industry as it moves towards carbon neutrality in 050, the 2022/2023 timeline for the revies of the regulations should be adhered to (as as endorsed by the European Council in December 201).
    [Show full text]
  • Iran, Terrorism, and Weapons of Mass Destruction
    Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 31:169–181, 2008 Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 1057-610X print / 1521-0731 online DOI: 10.1080/10576100701878424 Iran, Terrorism, and Weapons of Mass Destruction DANIEL BYMAN Center for Peace and Security Studies Georgetown University Washington, DC, USA and Saban Center for Middle East Policy Brookings Institution Washington, DC, USA This article reviews Iran’s past and current use of terrorism and assesses why U.S. attempts to halt Iran’s efforts have met with little success. With this assessment in mind, it argues that Iran is not likely transfer chemical, biological, or nuclear weapons to terrorist groups for several reasons. First, providing terrorists with such unconventional Downloaded By: [Georgetown University] At: 15:20 19 March 2008 weapons offers Iran few tactical advantages as these groups are able to operate effectively with existing methods and weapons. Second, Iran has become more cautious in its backing of terrorists in recent years. And third, Tehran is highly aware that any major escalation in its support for terrorism would incur U.S. wrath and international condemnation. The article concludes by offering recommendations for decreasing Iran’s support for terrorism. Since the Islamic Revolution in 1979, Iran has been one of the world’s most active sponsors of terrorism. Tehran has armed, trained, financed, inspired, organized, and otherwise supported dozens of violent groups over the years.1 Iran has backed not only groups in its Persian Gulf neighborhood, but also terrorists and radicals in Lebanon, the Palestinian territories, Bosnia, the Philippines, and elsewhere.2 This support remains strong even today: the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Refrigerant Safety Refrigerant History
    Refrigerant Safety The risks associated with the use of refrigerants in refrigeration and air­conditioning equipment can include toxicity, flammability, asphyxiation, and physical hazards. Although refrigerants can pose one or more of these risks, system design, engineering controls, and other techniques mitigate this risk for the use of refrigerant in various types of equipment. Refrigerant History Nearly all of the historically used refrigerants were flammable, toxic, or both. Some were also highly reactive, resulting in accidents (e. g., leak, explosion) due to equipment failure, poor maintenance, or human error. The task of finding a nonflammable refrigerant with good stability was given to Thomas Midgley in 1926. With his associates Albert Leon Henne and Robert Reed McNary, Dr. Midgley observed that the refrigerants then in use comprised relatively few chemical elements, many of which were clustered in an intersecting row and column of the periodic table of elements. The element at the intersection was fluorine, known to be toxic by itself. Midgley and his collaborators felt, however, that compounds containing fluorine could be both nontoxic and nonflammable. The attention of Midgley and his associates was drawn to organic fluorides by an error in the literature that showed the boiling point for tetrafluoromethane (carbon tetrafluoride) to be high compared to those for other fluorinated compounds. The correct boiling temperature later was found to be much lower. Nevertheless, the incorrect value was in the range sought and led to evaluation of organic fluorides as candidates. The shorthand convention, later introduced to simplify identification of the organic fluorides for a systematic search, is used today as the numbering system for refrigerants.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Gas Cylinder and Permeation Tube Standard Reference Materials Issued by the National Bureau of Standards
    A111D3 TTbS?? o z C/J NBS SPECIAL PUBLICATION 260-108 o ^EAU U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE/National Bureau of Standards Standard Reference Materials: Summary of Gas Cylinder and Permeation Tube Standard Reference Materials Issued by the National Bureau of Standards QC 100 U57 R. Mavrodineanu and T. E. Gills 260-108 1987 m he National Bureau of Standards' was established by an act of Congress on March 3, 1901. The Bureau's overall goal i s t0 strengthen and advance the nation's science and technology and facilitate their effective application for public benefit. To this end, the Bureau conducts research to assure international competitiveness and leadership of U.S. industry, science arid technology. NBS work involves development and transfer of measurements, standards and related science and technology, in support of continually improving U.S. productivity, product quality and reliability, innovation and underlying science and engineering. The Bureau's technical work is performed by the National Measurement Laboratory, the National Engineering Laboratory, the Institute for Computer Sciences and Technology, and the Institute for Materials Science and Engineering. The National Measurement Laboratory Provides the national system of physical and chemical measurement; • Basic Standards 2 coordinates the system with measurement systems of other nations and • Radiation Research furnishes essential services leading to accurate and uniform physical and • Chemical Physics chemical measurement throughout the Nation's scientific community, • Analytical Chemistry industry, and commerce; provides advisory and research services to other Government agencies; conducts physical and chemical research; develops, produces, and distributes Standard Reference Materials; provides calibration services; and manages the National Standard Reference Data System.
    [Show full text]