<<

BENEFITS OF

E M I S S I O N S T R A D I N G A C H I E V E S T H E E N V I R O N M E N T A L O B J E C T I V E – R E D U C E D E M I S S I O N S – A T T H E L O W E S T C O S T

Cap and is designed to deliver an environmental outcome; the cap must be met, or there are sanctions such as fines. Allowing trading within that cap is the most effective way of minimising the cost – which is good for business and good for households. Determining physical actions that companies must take, with no flexibility, is not guaranteed to achieve the necessary reductions. Nor is establishing a regulated price, since the price required to drive reductions may take policy-makers several years to determine.

Cap and trade also provides a way of establishing rigour around emissions monitoring, reporting and verification – essential for any policy to preserve integrity.

E M I S S I O N S T R A D I N G I S B E T T E R A B L E T O R E S P O N D T O E C O N O M I C F L U C T U A T I O N S T H A N O T H E R P O L I C Y T O O L S

Allowing the open market to set the price of translates to better flexibility and avoids price shocks or undue burdens. For example, as seen in Europe, prices will fall during a recession as industrial output, and thus emissions, fall. A centrally- administered does not have the same flexibility.

E M I S S I O N S T R A D I N G I N C E N T I V I S E S I N N O V A T I O N A N D I D E N T I F I E S L O W E S T - C O S T S O L U T I O N S T O M A K E B U S I N E S S E S M O R E S U S T A I N A B L E

The combination of an absolute cap on the level of emissions permitted and the signal from trading helps businesses to identify low-cost methods of reducing emissions on site, such as investing in efficiency – which can lead to a further reduction in overheads. This helps make business more sustainable for the future. Imposing technology requirements does not allow for creativity and can actually lead to higher costs as companies look merely to comply with regulations. BENEFITS OF EMISSIONS TRADING

C A P A N D T R A D E H A S P R O V E N T O B E A N E F F E C T I V E P O L I C Y C H O I C E

Cap and trade has proven its effectiveness in the US through the acid program, where it quickly and effectively reduced levels at a far lower cost than expected. The EU Emissions Trading System has shown that cap and trade can be extended to carbon, and in doing so creates a price on carbon that drives emissions reductions. Reductions in pollution that industry feared would be excessively costly were achieved at a fraction of the original estimates. The International Carbon Action Partnership’s 2019 status report found that almost 40% of global GDP is now subject to emissions trading, with systems active in South Korea, China, and the EU, among several others.

E M I S S I O N S T R A D I N G C A N P R O V I D E A G L O B A L R E S P O N S E T O A G L O B A L C H A L L E N G E

Allowing for the use of offsets, which lowers compliance costs, can help involve other jurisdictions in the fight against – and may even inspire them to establish their own emissions trading system, as the Clean Development Mechanism offset programme inspired China. Article 6 of the allows for countries to work together to reduce emissions as well as establishing a market-based mechanism to enhance efforts.

A S E M I S S I O N S T R A D I N G S P R E A D S A R O U N D T H E W O R L D , T H E R E A R E A N U M B E R O F O P P O R T U N I T I E S T O L I N K S Y S T E M S , W H I C H E N H A N C E S T H E I R E F F E C T I V E N E S S A N D R E D U C E S C O S T S

Connecting emissions trading systems, as California and Québec have done, widens the pool of participants to trade with, which reduces costs. This can allow for even greater emissions reductions to be achieved at a lower cost than previously. The cooperative approaches set out in Article 6 of the Paris Agreement taps into this cost-effectiveness.

For more information, please contact [email protected]

Updated March 2019