DOCSLIB.ORG

Exploring the Effects of GIS Use on Students' Achievement in Geography

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Exploring the effects of GIS use on students’ achievement in geography Von der Pädagogischen Hochschule Heidelberg zur Erlangung des Grades einer Doktorin der Philosophie (Dr. phil.) genehmigte Dissertation von Kathrin Viehrig aus Pirna (in Sachsen) 2014 Erstgutachter: Prof. Dr. Alexander Siegmund Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. Nir Orion Fach: Geographie Tag der Mündlichen Prüfung: 05.12.2014 Exploring the effects of GIS use on students’ achievement in geography Dissertation approved by the Heidelberg University of Education in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Kathrin Viehrig 2014 First advisor: Prof. Dr. Alexander Siegmund Professor of Physical Geography and its Didactics Head of Department of Geography Heidelberg University of Education, Heidelberg, Germany Second advisor: Prof. Dr. Nir Orion Head of Earth and Environmental Sciences Group Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel Other committee members: Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Knörzer Professor of Sport Science/ Sport Education Dean of Faculty of Natural and Social Sciences Heidelberg University of Education, Heidelberg, Germany Prof. Dr. Manuela Welzel-Breuer Professor of Physics and its Didactics Heidelberg University of Education, Heidelberg, Germany Prof. Dr. Ulrich Michel Professor of Geoinformatics and its Didactics Heidelberg University of Education, Heidelberg, Germany Subject: Geography Day of the oral examination: 05.12.2014 5 Acknowledgements There are many people who provided valuable contributions and support to this dissertation. First of all, I would like to thank my main advisor Prof. Dr. Alexander Siegmund for his continuing support and provision of learning opportunities as well as helpful discussions. Secondly, I want to thank Prof. Dr. Nir Orion for agreeing to be my second advisor, welcoming me for visits when I was in Israel and very interesting discussions about systemic thinking. Thanks also to Dean Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Knörzer for heading the committee as well as Prof. Dr. Manuela Welzel-Breuer and Prof. Dr. Ulrich Michel for agreeing to be members of the committee. Many people have helped shape my understanding and skills in geography education, GIS and statistics, have provided feedback, help and new insights, and have proofread draft versions. First of all, I want to thank the current and former members of the rgeo-team at the Department of Geography, Heidelberg University of Education, especially Dipl.-Geoökol. Daniel Volz, Dr. Christina Fiene, Dr. Isabelle Kollar, Dr. Raimund Ditter, Dr. Sebastian Günthert, Dipl.-Geog. Markus Jahn, Dr. Kerstin Voß, Dr. Alexandra Siegmund, Prof. Dr. Peter Dippon, Dr. Nils Wolf and Dipl.-Geog. Svenja Brockmüller. I also want to thank the HEIGIS-members, Dr. Sascha Wüstenberg, Dr. Samuel Greiff and Prof. Dr. Joachim Funke. Additionally, there are many people through which I was inspired or received valuable ideas for this dissertation, such as Prof. Dr. Priyadarsi Roy, Prof. Dr. Kristina Reiss, Dr. Joseph Kerski, Prof. Dr. Sarah Bednarz and many people I talked to at confer- ences, both nationally and internationally, and courses. Moreover, colleagues from other departments at the University of Education such as Saskia Gensow also provided valuable input, especially at the beginning of the dissertation. I also want to thank the students and teachers that participated and who thus made this dissertation possible. Thanks as well to the responsible authorities for the permissions. Additionally, thanks also to Dr. Ulrike Klein helping to make the Kiel professional development course happen. Acknowledgements 6 Furthermore, thanks to Ogada Ochala and Sam Stearman who allowed me to use their Kenya photographs, Dr. Jong Wong Lee and Dr. Joseph Kerski for al- lowing me to use adapted versions of the spatial thinking items and Wester- mann for supporting the use of their WebGIS-platform within the treatment. Thanks to the Heidelberg University of Education, the SDW and the DFG for fi- nancial support. Moreover, thanks to ESRI for the provision of a student license. Thanks to those people who supported me on the way. A special thanks to Dipl.-Biol. Ute Viehrig, Dr. Jochen Viehrig, Dr. Marèn Viehrig and Dr. Avi Epstein for all their support. Thanks to Eli – for everything. 7 Table of contents Acknowledgements 5 Table of contents 7 Table of figures 11 Table of tables 14 Abbreviations 18 Abstract 20 Zusammenfassung 23 1 Setting the scene 26 1.1 GIS didactics: Educational white lands 26 1.2 Significance of exploration endeavors 28 1.3 Research objective 32 2 Reviewing the literature 34 2.1 Competencies in geography education 34 2.1.1 Significance of geographic system competency 35 2.1.2 Possible structures of geographic system competency 37 2.1.3 Possible achievement of geographic system competency 41 2.2 GIS in geography education 43 2.2.1 Extent of GIS use in education 44 2.2.2 Rationales for GIS use in education 46 2.2.3 Potentials of GIS use for improving student achievement 48 2.2.4 Costs of GIS use in education 50 2.3 Role of student variables 51 2.3.1 Age 52 2.3.2 Sex 53 2.3.3 Pre-achievement 54 2.3.4 Language and migration background 55 2.3.5 Affective variables 57 2.3.6 Classroom setting 58 2.4 GIS use and geographic system competency 59 Table of contents 8 3 Charting the course 60 3.1 Research questions and hypotheses 64 3.2 Statistical considerations and data analysis 66 3.2.1 Scale quality and analysis 66 3.2.2 Connections between variables 69 3.2.3 Software used for analyses 74 3.3 Sample procedures 75 4 Describing the samples 77 4.1 Variables 77 4.1.1 Basic demographic variables 77 4.1.2 Language background 77 4.1.3 Migration background 79 4.2 Study 1 80 4.3 Study 2 80 4.4 Study 3 81 4.5 Study 4 81 4.6 Study 5 82 4.7 Limitations due to the achieved samples 88 5 Describing the instruments 89 5.1 Definition and model selection 90 5.2 Item basis 92 5.3 Study 1 93 5.3.1 Systemic thinking 94 5.3.2 Conclusions 97 5.4 Study 2 98 5.4.1 Spatial thinking 98 5.4.2 Conclusions 99 5.5 Study 3 99 5.5.1 Spatial thinking 100 5.5.2 Systemic thinking 101 5.5.3 Conclusions 105 5.6 Study 4 105 Table of contents 9 5.6.1 Spatial thinking 105 5.6.2 Conclusions 107 5.7 Study 5 107 5.7.1 Spatial thinking 108 5.7.2 Systemic thinking 110 5.7.3 Conclusions 120 5.8 Limitations due to the assessment instruments used 121 6 Describing the learning unit 122 6.1 Time frame 124 6.2 Basic methodological considerations 124 6.3 Study 3 126 6.4 Study 5 127 6.5 Limitations due to the learning units used 132 7 Analyzing the findings 134 7.1 Study 3 134 7.1.1 Hypothesis I: Improvement through GIS 134 7.1.2 Hypothesis II: Improvement map vs. GIS 135 7.1.3 Hypothesis III-b: Improvement and sex 136 7.1.4 Hypothesis III-e: Improvement and pre-achievement 138 7.1.5 Hypothesis III-f: Improvement and pre-spatial thinking 141 7.1.6 Conclusions from Study 3 144 7.2 Study 5 144 7.2.1 Hypothesis I: Improvement 144 7.2.2 Hypothesis II: Improvement GIS vs. map 145 7.2.3 Hypothesis III-a: Improvement and age 146 7.2.4 Hypothesis III-b: Improvement and sex 151 7.2.5 Hypothesis III-c: Improvement and migration background 154 7.2.6 Hypothesis III-d: Improvement and language background 157 7.2.7 Hypothesis III-e: Improvement and pre-achievement 163 7.2.8 Hypothesis III-f: Improvement and pre-spatial thinking 171 7.2.9 Hypothesis III-g: Improvement and materials 175 7.2.10 Hypothesis III-h: Improvement and pre-experience 178 Table of contents 10 7.2.11 Overall HLMs 180 7.2.12 Conclusions from Study 5 184 8 Discussing the implications 186 8.1 Implications based on the student variables included 187 8.1.1 Age 187 8.1.2 Sex 188 8.1.3 Migration and language background 189 8.1.4 Pre-achievement and pre-spatial thinking 190 8.1.5 Pre-experience with GIS 191 8.2 Implications based on sample size and analyses used 192 8.3 Implications based on the treatment used 193 8.3.1 Material type 193 8.3.2 Methodology 194 8.4 Implications based on the test instruments used 197 8.4.1 Systemic thinking 197 8.4.2 Spatial thinking 200 8.4.3 Model development 200 8.4.4 Methodology 203 8.5 Overall outlook 203 9. References 205 10. Appendices 241 10.1 Rasch models (Conquest) 241 10.1.1 Basic model 241 10.1.2 Model with export (pretest) 241 10.1.3 Model with import (posttest) 241 10.2 Tourism in Kenya 242 10.3 GIS data sources 246 10.4 Additional sources for the learning materials 247 11 Table of figures Fig. 1 Structure of selected proposed guiding objectives for geography 36 education Fig. 2 Composition of competency structure models 37 Fig. 3 Example of an empirically derived structure of systemic thinking skills 38 Fig. 4 HEIGIS model after the CogLabs 41 Fig. 5 Frequency of use of geo-media: student answers (%) 44 Fig. 6 Frequency of use of geo-media: teacher answers (%) 44 Fig. 7 Study overview including n used for analysis 61 Fig. 8 Sample description by group and sex 84 Fig. 9 Sample description by group and stream 85 Fig. 10 Sample description by group and type of materials 85 Fig.
Recommended publications
  • Uncovering the Underground's Role in the Formation of Modern London, 1855-1945

    Uncovering the Underground's Role in the Formation of Modern London, 1855-1945

    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Theses and Dissertations--History History 2016 Minding the Gap: Uncovering the Underground's Role in the Formation of Modern London, 1855-1945 Danielle K. Dodson University of Kentucky, [email protected] Digital Object Identifier: http://dx.doi.org/10.13023/ETD.2016.339 Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Dodson, Danielle K., "Minding the Gap: Uncovering the Underground's Role in the Formation of Modern London, 1855-1945" (2016). Theses and Dissertations--History. 40. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/history_etds/40 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the History at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations--History by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDENT AGREEMENT: I represent that my thesis or dissertation and abstract are my original work. Proper attribution has been given to all outside sources. I understand that I am solely responsible for obtaining any needed copyright permissions. I have obtained needed written permission statement(s) from the owner(s) of each third-party copyrighted matter to be included in my work, allowing electronic distribution (if such use is not permitted by the fair use doctrine) which will be submitted to UKnowledge as Additional File. I hereby grant to The University of Kentucky and its agents the irrevocable, non-exclusive, and royalty-free license to archive and make accessible my work in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known.
  • A New Geography of European Power?

    A New Geography of European Power?

    A NEW GEOGRAPHY OF EUROPEAN POWER? EGMONT PAPER 42 A NEW GEOGRAPHY OF EUROPEAN POWER? James ROGERS January 2011 The Egmont Papers are published by Academia Press for Egmont – The Royal Institute for International Relations. Founded in 1947 by eminent Belgian political leaders, Egmont is an independent think-tank based in Brussels. Its interdisciplinary research is conducted in a spirit of total academic freedom. A platform of quality information, a forum for debate and analysis, a melting pot of ideas in the field of international politics, Egmont’s ambition – through its publications, seminars and recommendations – is to make a useful contribution to the decision- making process. *** President: Viscount Etienne DAVIGNON Director-General: Marc TRENTESEAU Series Editor: Prof. Dr. Sven BISCOP *** Egmont - The Royal Institute for International Relations Address Naamsestraat / Rue de Namur 69, 1000 Brussels, Belgium Phone 00-32-(0)2.223.41.14 Fax 00-32-(0)2.223.41.16 E-mail [email protected] Website: www.egmontinstitute.be © Academia Press Eekhout 2 9000 Gent Tel. 09/233 80 88 Fax 09/233 14 09 [email protected] www.academiapress.be J. Story-Scientia NV Wetenschappelijke Boekhandel Sint-Kwintensberg 87 B-9000 Gent Tel. 09/225 57 57 Fax 09/233 14 09 [email protected] www.story.be All authors write in a personal capacity. Lay-out: proxess.be ISBN 978 90 382 1714 7 D/2011/4804/19 U 1547 NUR1 754 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the permission of the publishers.
  • Earth/Environmental (2014) Released Final Exam

    Earth/Environmental (2014) Released Final Exam

    Released Items Fall 2014 NC Final Exam Earth/Environmental Science RELEASED Public Schools of North Carolina Student Booklet State Board of Education Department of Public Instruction Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6314 Copyrightã 2014 by the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. All rights reserved. E ARTH/ENVIRONMENTAL S CIENCE — R ELEASED I TEMS 1 Cracks in rocks widen as water in them freezes and thaws. How does this affect the surface of the Earth? A It reduces the rates of soil formation. B It changes the chemical composition of the rocks. C It exposes rocks to increased rates of erosion and weathering. D It limits the exposure of rocks to acid precipitation. 2 How can urbanization affect a local area? A It can increase the number of invasive species in an area. B It can decrease the risk of water pollution in an area. C It can increase the risk of flooding in an area. D It can decrease the need for natural resources in an area. 3 Which is a farming technique that could improve the soil and the environment? A using fueled machines that will turn the soil continuously B creating undisturbed layers of mulch in the soil C placing inorganic chemical fertilizers in the soil D irrigating the RELEASEDsoil with salty water 1 Go to the next page. E ARTH/ENVIRONMENTAL S CIENCE — R ELEASED I TEMS 4 Subsurface ocean currents continually circulate from the warm waters near the equator to the colder waters in other parts of the world. What is the main cause of these currents? A differences in the topography along the ocean floor B differences
  • What Is the Importance of Islands to Environmental Conservation?

    What Is the Importance of Islands to Environmental Conservation?

    Environmental Conservation (2017) 44 (4): 311–322 C Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2017 doi:10.1017/S0376892917000479 What is the importance of islands to environmental THEMATIC SECTION Humans and Island conservation? Environments CHRISTOPH KUEFFER∗ 1 AND KEALOHANUIOPUNA KINNEY2 1Institute of Integrative Biology, ETH Zurich, Universitätsstrasse 16, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland and 2Institute of Pacifc Islands Forestry, US Forest Service, 60 Nowelo St. Hilo, HI, USA Date submitted: 15 May 2017; Date accepted: 8 August 2017 SUMMARY islands of the world’s oceans, we cover both islands close to continents and others isolated far out in the oceans, and the This article discusses four features of islands that make full range from small to very large islands. Small and isolated them places of special importance to environmental islands represent unique cultural and biological values and the conservation. First, investment in island conservation environmental challenges of insularity in its most pronounced is both urgent and cost-effective. Islands are form. However, as we will demonstrate, all islands and island threatened hotspots of diversity that concentrate people share enough come concerns to consider them together unique cultural, biological and geophysical values, (Baldacchino 2007; Royle 2008; Gillespie & Clague 2009; and they form the basis of the livelihoods of Baldacchino & Niles 2011; Royle 2014). millions of islanders. Second, islands are paradigmatic Islands are hotspots of cultural, biological and geophysical places of human–environment relationships. Island diversity, and as such they form the basis of the livelihoods livelihoods have a long tradition of existing within of millions of islanders (Menard 1986; Nunn 1994; Royle spatial, ecological and ultimately social boundaries 2008; Gillespie & Clague 2009; Royle 2014; Kueffer et al.
  • Environmental Science in the Course of Different Levels

    Environmental Science in the Course of Different Levels

    THIS PAGE IS BLANK NEW AGE INTERNATIONAL (P) LIMITED, PUBLISHERS New Delhi · Bangalore · Chennai · Cochin · Guwahati · Hyderabad Jalandhar · Kolkata · Lucknow · Mumbai · Ranchi PUBLISHING FOR ONE WORLD Visit us at www.newagepublishers.com Copyright © 2006 New Age International (P) Ltd., Publishers Published by New Age International (P) Ltd., Publishers All rights reserved. No part of this ebook may be reproduced in any form, by photostat, microfilm, xerography, or any other means, or incorporated into any information retrieval system, electronic or mechanical, without the written permission of the publisher. All inquiries should be emailed to [email protected] ISBN (10) : 81-224-2330-2 ISBN (13) : 978-81-224-2330-3 PUBLISHING FOR ONE WORLD NEW AGE INTERNATIONAL (P) LIMITED, PUBLISHERS 4835/24, Ansari Road, Daryaganj, New Delhi - 110002 Visit us at www.newagepublishers.com Education is a process of development which includes the three major activities, teaching, training and instruction. Teaching is social as well as a professional activity. It is science as well as art. Modern education is not in a sphere but it has a long and large area of study. Now a days most part of the world population is facing different problems related with the nature and they are studying the solutions to save the nature and global problems, but on the second hand we even today do not try to understand our local problems related to the nature. So for the awareness of the problems of P nature and pollution the higher education commission has suggested to add the Environmental Science in the course of different levels.
  • 168 2Nd Issue 2015

    168 2Nd Issue 2015

    ISSN 0019–1043 Ice News Bulletin of the International Glaciological Society Number 168 2nd Issue 2015 Contents 2 From the Editor 25 Annals of Glaciology 56(70) 5 Recent work 25 Annals of Glaciology 57(71) 5 Chile 26 Annals of Glaciology 57(72) 5 National projects 27 Report from the New Zealand Branch 9 Northern Chile Annual Workshop, July 2015 11 Central Chile 29 Report from the Kathmandu Symposium, 13 Lake district (37–41° S) March 2015 14 Patagonia and Tierra del Fuego (41–56° S) 43 News 20 Antarctica International Glaciological Society seeks a 22 Abbreviations new Chief Editor and three new Associate 23 International Glaciological Society Chief Editors 23 Journal of Glaciology 45 Glaciological diary 25 Annals of Glaciology 56(69) 48 New members Cover picture: Khumbu Glacier, Nepal. Photograph by Morgan Gibson. EXCLUSION CLAUSE. While care is taken to provide accurate accounts and information in this Newsletter, neither the editor nor the International Glaciological Society undertakes any liability for omissions or errors. 1 From the Editor Dear IGS member It is now confirmed. The International Glacio­ be moving from using the EJ Press system to logical Society and Cambridge University a ScholarOne system (which is the one CUP Press (CUP) have joined in a partnership in uses). For a transition period, both online which CUP will take over the production and submission/review systems will run in parallel. publication of our two journals, the Journal Submissions will be two­tiered – of Glaciology and the Annals of Glaciology. ‘Papers’ and ‘Letters’. There will no longer This coincides with our journals becoming be a distinction made between ‘General’ fully Gold Open Access on 1 January 2016.
  • Landforms and Their Evolution

    Landforms and Their Evolution

    CHAPTER LANDFORMS AND THEIR EVOLUTION fter weathering processes have had a part of the earth’s surface from one landform their actions on the earth materials into another or transformation of individual Amaking up the surface of the earth, the landforms after they are once formed. That geomorphic agents like running water, ground means, each and every landform has a history water, wind, glaciers, waves perform erosion. of development and changes through time. A It is already known to you that erosion causes landmass passes through stages of development changes on the surface of the earth. Deposition somewhat comparable to the stages of life — follows erosion and because of deposition too, youth, mature and old age. changes occur on the surface of the earth. As this chapter deals with landforms and What are the two important aspects of their evolution ‘first’ start with the question, the evolution of landforms? what is a landform? In simple words, small to medium tracts or parcels of the earth’s surface are called landforms. RUNNING WATER In humid regions, which receive heavy rainfall If landform is a small to medium sized running water is considered the most important part of the surface of the earth, what is a of the geomorphic agents in bringing about landscape? the degradation of the land surface. There are two components of running water. One is Several related landforms together make overland flow on general land surface as a up landscapes, (large tracts of earth’s surface). sheet. Another is linear flow as streams and Each landform has its own physical shape, size, materials and is a result of the action of rivers in valleys.
  • Geography Education, Spatial Thinking, and Geospatial Technologies: Introduction to the Special Issue Injeong Jo Texas State University, Ijo@Txstate.Edu

    Geography Education, Spatial Thinking, and Geospatial Technologies: Introduction to the Special Issue Injeong Jo Texas State University, [email protected]

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee International Journal of Geospatial and Environmental Research Volume 5 Article 1 Number 3 Geospatial Teaching and Learning 7-2018 Geography Education, Spatial Thinking, and Geospatial Technologies: Introduction to the Special Issue Injeong Jo Texas State University, [email protected] Jung Eun Hong University of West Georgia, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.uwm.edu/ijger Part of the Earth Sciences Commons, Environmental Sciences Commons, and the Geography Commons Recommended Citation Jo, Injeong and Hong, Jung Eun (2018) "Geography Education, Spatial Thinking, and Geospatial Technologies: Introduction to the Special Issue," International Journal of Geospatial and Environmental Research: Vol. 5 : No. 3 , Article 1. Available at: https://dc.uwm.edu/ijger/vol5/iss3/1 This Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by UWM Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Journal of Geospatial and Environmental Research by an authorized administrator of UWM Digital Commons. For more information, please contact open- [email protected]. Geography Education, Spatial Thinking, and Geospatial Technologies: Introduction to the Special Issue Abstract This special issue contains six papers on the development of students’ knowledge, skills, and practice of geospatial thinking in a variety of educational contexts. Each of the papers addresses an aspect of the research gap that deserves timely attention in the field, focusing on curriculum design, pedagogical approaches, exemplary resources or tools, and strategies to move forward for the promotion of geospatial teaching and learning.
  • Types of States Activity

    Types of States Activity

    Types of States Activity Unit 5 - Political Geography / AP Human Geography ​ Craig Gaslow - Westlake High School, Austin TX *Applicable to any AP Human Geography class Objective Students will learn about: 1. the dynamics of the Ukraine/Russia conflict 2. the size, shape, and population distributions of current states previously under Soviet rule 3. ethnic, religious, and linguistic distributions of former Soviet states 4. different types of states in the former Soviet Union - from multi-state nations to nation-states, from stateless nations to multi-ethnic states 5. the historical background of central Asian states Introduction Russia & Ukraine video ○ Show the following video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iJAKCV8bw9E ​ ○ Have students Think/Pair/Share the following questions ​ ​ ■ What does the video say about the relationship between Ukraine and Russia? ■ How does the situation in Ukraine relate to concepts we’ve discussed in the AP Human Geography political unit like the Russian near abroad, MacKinder’s Heartland Theory, autonomous states, multi-state nations, multinational states, etc.? True Size Mapping Activity 1. In groups of 2-4, have students visit: https://thetruesize.com ​ 2. Have students choose 3 of the following states, type them into the top left search bar, and drag these countries over the United States: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Estonia, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, Russia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, and Uzbekistan. 3. Have students research the population size and population distributions of their 3 chosen countries (states), and compare these to the United States. 4. Share out these results as a class, and discuss any notable shapes (morphology): compact, large, elongated, perforated, fragmented, prorupted, microstate, exclave, enclave, landlocked.
  • A Geomorphic Classification System

    A Geomorphic Classification System

    A Geomorphic Classification System U.S.D.A. Forest Service Geomorphology Working Group Haskins, Donald M.1, Correll, Cynthia S.2, Foster, Richard A.3, Chatoian, John M.4, Fincher, James M.5, Strenger, Steven 6, Keys, James E. Jr.7, Maxwell, James R.8 and King, Thomas 9 February 1998 Version 1.4 1 Forest Geologist, Shasta-Trinity National Forests, Pacific Southwest Region, Redding, CA; 2 Soil Scientist, Range Staff, Washington Office, Prineville, OR; 3 Area Soil Scientist, Chatham Area, Tongass National Forest, Alaska Region, Sitka, AK; 4 Regional Geologist, Pacific Southwest Region, San Francisco, CA; 5 Integrated Resource Inventory Program Manager, Alaska Region, Juneau, AK; 6 Supervisory Soil Scientist, Southwest Region, Albuquerque, NM; 7 Interagency Liaison for Washington Office ECOMAP Group, Southern Region, Atlanta, GA; 8 Water Program Leader, Rocky Mountain Region, Golden, CO; and 9 Geology Program Manager, Washington Office, Washington, DC. A Geomorphic Classification System 1 Table of Contents Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... 5 I. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................. 6 History of Classification Efforts in the Forest Service ............................................................... 6 History of Development .............................................................................................................. 7 Goals
  • Thursday, May 14Th 9:00 AM Welcome Introductions 9:15-11:45 AM

    Thursday, May 14Th 9:00 AM Welcome Introductions 9:15-11:45 AM

    Thursday, May 14th 9:00 AM Welcome Helena Zinkham Acting Director of Collections and Services Library of Congress Introductions John Hessler Specialist in Modern Cartography and Geographic Information Science Library of Congress 9:15-11:45 AM Finding the Antipodes 1. Antarctic Keynote Robert Clancy From the Place of “No Bears” to a “Global Village” or the Histo-cartography of Antarctica This presentation features contemporary maps to outline the story of Antarctica, from its time in mythology to a continent today recognised as a global village! There are four parts: Ideas of the shape of the world, the concept of a ‘polar unit’, the ‘drivers’ of discovery (trade, science and politics), and post- International Geographical Year (IGY) Antarctica as a ‘global village! These changes evolve in parallel with the development of the printed map, which in turn best documents the transition where discovery replaces imagination. 2. Arctic Keynote Michael Robinson The Rise of “Arctic Fever” in America In the 19th century, dozens of American expeditions sailed north to the Arctic to find a sea route to Asia and, ultimately, to stand at the North Pole. Few of these missions were successful, and many men lost their lives en route. Yet failure did little to dampen the enthusiasm of new explorers or the crowds at home that cheered them on. The Arctic became a landscape for artists, the staging ground for new technologies, and a field for geopolitical competition. In surveying the unknown regions of the North, explorers revealed much about themselves and the ever-changing world they left behind. 3.
  • Mobile Learning for Sustainable Development and Environmental Teacher Education

    Mobile Learning for Sustainable Development and Environmental Teacher Education

    sustainability Article Mobile Learning for Sustainable Development and Environmental Teacher Education María Sebastián-López and Rafael de Miguel González * Faculty of Education, ARGOS-IUCA, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 30 September 2020; Accepted: 18 November 2020; Published: 23 November 2020 Abstract: Outdoor learning has, for a long time, been an important instructional resource in school education, usually embedded in the natural sciences and social sciences curricula. Teaching geography, geology, or biology beyond the traditional classroom allows students to interact with physical and social environments for meaningful learning. Mobile devices that are based on geospatial technologies have provided more accurate data, but also a combined instructional design with other WebGIS, map viewers, or geographic information system (GIS) layers, which are useful to foster education for sustainable development. This paper analyzes the applications of mobile learning based on citizen science and volunteer geographic information, but also on the growing awareness that citizens and educators need a set of digital competencies to enhance and innovate lifelong learning and active citizenship. The empirical research aims to measure teacher–training experience, highlighting the potential of mobile devices and their applications in environmental education. Data collected from the research and results prove the positive impact of mobile learning in environmental education. Finally, a discussion about mobile learning and education for sustainable development is provided. Keywords: environmental education; sustainable development; mobile learning; competencies 1. Mobile Learning for Geographic and Environmental Education The teaching of school geography has always had an indisputable locational component, which has required leaving the classroom and the school for direct knowledge of the students’ natural and social environment.