Indian Journal of Biotechnology Vol 11, July 2012, pp 295-299

In vitro propagation and conservation of bimaculata Hook.f. & Thoms.

Arpita Dafadar and Timir Baran Jha* Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Botany, Presidency University, Kolkata 700 073, India Received 15 April 2011; revised 30 October 2011; accepted 10 December 2011 Hook.f. & Thoms., a less bitter species of the genus Swertia, is phytochemically important for its bioactive compounds (xanthones). Flower buds and immature capsules were collected from in vivo donor from South Sikkim during the month of September 2009. Three to five per cent (3-5%) seeds within the intact or split capsule germinated aseptically in full strength Murashige and Skoog’s (MS) medium with low concentration of either benzylaminopurine (BA; 2.22 µM) or kinetin (Kn; 2.32 µM). In vitro grown shoot tips were used as primary explants. Shoot multiplication was obtained on half-strength MS medium (BM) with 3% (w/v) sucrose and with different combinations and concentration of BA (2.22-4.44 µM), Kn (2.32-4.65 µM) and 1-napthalene acetic acid (NAA; 0.54 µM). However, the best response with 15.6 shoots per explants was obtained on BM with 2.22 µM BA, 2.32 µM Kn and 0.54 µM NAA. The number of shoots was further increased to 20.6 on addition of 10 mM KNO3 in the medium. About 100% healthy root induction on isolated shoots was achieved on BM devoid of any plant growth regulator (PGR) within 5 wk. Complete rooted plantlets were successfully hardened and transplanted in the soil with 80-90% survival rate. Meiotic study from flower buds of donor plants and mitotic chromosome study from regenerated plants revealed n=13 bivalents and 2n=26 chromosomes respectively. The protocol of in vitro propagation and chromosomal database developed for the first time in an unexplored S. bimaculata is highly efficient, repeatable and can be used for conservation of germplasm.

Keywords: Chromosomal database, Swertia bimaculata, shoot multiplication

Introduction It has been reported long back that S. bimaculata The genus Swertia is used in the traditional system contains medicinally important bioactive compounds4, of medicine since prehistoric times. It comprises of such as, gentiananine, a chemical known for about 170 known species worldwide1 and about hypothermic activity, and xanthones, an antioxidants 40 species are reported to be available in eastern and that can combat cancer and help to reduce cholesterol western parts of Indian Himalayas at high altitudes, and hardening of arteries. However, no systematic ranging between 1,200-3,000 m. Among the effort has been made to formulate alternative methods different species available in India, S. chirata is for its propagation and germplasm conservation. considered the most elite one in terms of medicinal Chromosome analysis in any plant species is carried properties, although it is very bitter in taste. Several out at the somatic and gametic level primarily to reports on phytochemical analysis of S. chirata are determine the stability of the plant at the cellular level available in the literature2,3. However, most of the and also for genetic and biotechnological studies. other species did not receive much attention Earlier chromosomal analyses5,6 reported 22 and 26 concerning conservation and chemical analysis. somatic chromosomes (2n=22/26) and 11 gametic Even well documented morphological comparisons chromosomes (n=11) in S. bimaculata, which are not available in the genus. S. bimaculata Hook.f. necessitates the reassessment of chromosomal studies. & Thoms. (syn. Ophelia bimaculata Siebold & A review of literature reveals that maximum Zucc.) is an unexplored, less bitter species of the published reports on micropropagation are available genus and is frequently mixed with S. chirata as a in S. japonica, S. pseudo-chinensis, and S. chirata7-15. substitute and/or adulterant. Continuous However, no published work on in vitro propagation indiscriminate harvesting has enormously reduced its and conservation is available for Indian S. bimaculata. population strength in the natural habitats. Therefore, the present study primarily focuses on in vitro propagation and conservation of S. bimaculata ______using shoot tip explants from in vitro grown seedlings *Author for correspondence: Tel: +91-33-22198647, Fax: +91-33-22412738 and simultaneous preparation of chromosomal E-mail: [email protected] database from gametic (n) and somatic (2n) tissues. 296 INDIAN J BIOTECHNOL, JULY 2012

Materials and Methods Chromosomal Analysis Plant Material Healthy root-tips, randomly taken from Green capsules (0.5-1.0 cm) of S. bimaculata plants micropropagated plants growing on BM, were pre- were collected during the month of September, 2009 treated with 2 mM hydroxyquinolene for 3½ h at from South Sikkim (2000 m). Capsules were washed 12-14ºC temperature, followed by overnight fixation thoroughly in running tap water and treated with 5% in acetic alcohol (1:3). Hydrolysis of the root tips was (v/v) Teepol (commercial bleach) for 25-30 min, performed with 1 N HCl for 12-15 min at room temperature (RT). Hydrolyzed root tips were stained followed by surface sterilization with 0.1% HgCl2 for 25-30 min. Sterilants were removed by 4-5 times in 2% aceto-orcein for 3 h and squashed in 45% acetic washing with sterilized distilled water. Intact capsule acid to obtain well-scattered metaphase plates. containing large number of immature seeds as well as Chromosome numbers per cell were recorded and isolated individual seeds were placed on Murashige photographs were taken under Ziess and Skoog’s (MS) basal medium with plant growth photomicroscope. Meiosis was studied in flower buds regulator. collected from the in vivo donor plant. Dissected anthers were smeared with 2% aceto-carmine to Culture Media and Culture Conditions obtain the meiotic metaphase I plates. Chromosome MS medium with 3% (w/v) sucrose, 0.75% a numbers per pollen mother cell (PMC) were manually gar-agar and 2.22 µM benzyl aminopurine (BA) or counted and photographs were taken under Ziess 2.32 µM kinetin (Kn) were used to induce germination photomicroscope. of seeds. On the other hand, half-strength MS medium (BM) with different combinations and concentrations Statistical Analysis of BA (2.22-4.44 µM), Kn (2.32-4.65 µM), All experiments were repeated no less than three 1-napthalene acetic acid (NAA; 0.54 µM) and times. The experiments were set up in a randomized 10 mM KNO3 were used for multiplication of design. Data were analyzed by analysis of variance shoots. The number of shoots developed per (ANOVA) to detect significances between means. explants was recorded after 6-8 wk. The pH of Means differing significantly were compared using culture medium was adjusted to 5.6-5.8 and Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT) at a 5% sterilized at a 1.06 kg cm2 pressure, 121°C probability level. Variability of data has also been temperature for 15-17 min. All the aseptic cultures expressed as the mean±standard error (SE). were incubated at 22±2ºC under a photoperiod of 16 h light/8 h dark cycles. All experiments were Results and Discussion repeated more than three times. Germination of 3-5% seeds was obtained from About 4-5 cm long in vitro regenerated intact or half splitted capsules (Figs 1ai & ii) in MS shoots were placed in BM with/without different medium with either BA or Kn but not from any concentrations of indole-3-acetic acid isolated seeds. In vitro grown shoot tips were used as (IAA; 5.71-11.42 µM) or indole-3-butyric acid (IBA; primary explants and the shoot multiplication was 4.90-9.80 µM) for induction of roots in 16 h light/8 h achieved on BM with different levels of BA dark cycles. Frequency of root induction and number (2.22-4.44 µM), Kn (2.32-4.65 µM) and 0.54 µM of roots developed per shoots were recorded in NAA within 10 wk of culture. However, the best between 2-5 wk. response was obtained with 2.22 µM BA, 2.32 µM Kn and 0.54 µM NAA, where about 15.6 shoots Hardening of Plants were obtained (Table 1, Fig. 1b). The number of Complete plants with well-developed roots were shoots was further increased to nearly 20.6 when taken out carefully from the culture flasks and additional 10 mM KNO3 was added in the medium. thoroughly washed in tap water and transplanted in Also in our earlier work, positive roles of KNO3 earthen pots containing a mixture of were reported on shoot multiplication of soil+sand+compost (1:1:1). Initially plants were S. chirata 11. Similar findings were also reported by covered by polythene bags and kept inside the plant other workers in many other plants like Fragaria growth chamber for 2-3 wk under 80-90% humidity. ananassa15, Camellia sinensis16, Helianthus annuus17 Covers were gradually withdrawn from the hardened and Nicotiana tabacum18. It can be thus concluded plants and they were grown normally. that higher number of shoots can be induced in both DAFADAR & JHA: IN VITRO PROPAGATION OF S. BIMACULATA HOOK.f. & THOMS. 297

Fig. 1 (a-g)—In vitro propagation of Swertia bimaculata: a (i & ii). Intact capsule containing large number of immature seeds and germinated seeds with seedlings in MS medium with either 2.22 µM BA or 2.32 µM Kn (bar=0.2 cm); b. Multiplication of shoots on ½ MS medium with 2.22 µM BA, 2.32 µM Kn and 0.54 µM NAA after 10 wk of culture (bar=1 cm); c. Induction of roots in excised shoots on ½ MS basal medium without any growth regulator (bar=1 cm); d. Complete rooted plants before hardening (bar =5.5 cm); e. Hardened plants growing in the pot (bar=5.5 cm); f. Somatic metaphase plate showing 2n=26 from in vitro regenerated plants (bar=5 cm); & g. Meiotic metaphase plate showing n=13 from in vivo donor plant (bar= 5 cm).

298 INDIAN J BIOTECHNOL, JULY 2012

Table 1—Multiplication of shoots of S. bimaculata on ½ MS Table 2—Induction of roots in plantlets of S. bimaculata in MS medium supplemented with different concentrations and basal (BM) and auxin containing medium

combinations of PGRs and additive BM + Auxins % of shoot Av. no. of Av. root Conc. of PGRs KNO3 as No. of (µM) forming roots* roots/shoot* length* (µM) additive shoots/explants* IAA IBA

BA Kn NAA (mM) 5.71 - 82.8±2.1b 8.8 ± 0.3c 6.6 ± 0.5a

- 4.90 72±0.8c 7.3 ± 0.2d 5.2 ± 0.1b 4.44 4.65 0.54 - 6.1 ± 0.1 cd 5.71 4.90 98.9±0.7a 10.5 ± 0.5b 6.7 ± 0.4a 4.44 4.18 0.54 - 6.6 ± 1.1 cd - 9.80 87.1±0.7b 9.6 ± 0.6b 6.0 ± 0.3a 4.44 3.72 0.54 - 6.8 ± 0.5 cd 11.42 - 67.5±1.7d 5.5 ± 0.1e 4.5 ± 0.4c 4.44 3.25 0.54 - 8.3 ± 0.2 f - - 100±0.5a 12.5 ± 0.7a 6.7 ± 0.4a 4.44 2.79 0.54 - 8.3 ± 2.1 f *Shoots were cultured in half-strength MS media (BM) with 4.44 2.32 0.54 - 12.2 ± 1.1 d 3% (w/v) sucrose with/without PGRs. Data were collected after 2.22 4.65 0.54 - 7.6 ± 0.2 ab 4 wk of culture in case of with PGRs and 5 wk of culture in 2.22 4.18 0.54- - 7.2 ± 0.4 ab case of without PGR. Each value represented the mean±SE. 2.22 3.72 0.54 - 11.8 ± 0.5 c Means having different letters in superscript are significantly 2.22 3.25 0.54 - 14.7 ± 0.6c 2.22 2.32 - - 15.6 ± 0.5 different from each other (p≤0.05) according to Duncan’s b multiple range test. 2.22 2.32 - 10 20.6 ± 0.8a

*Shoots were cultured in half-strength MS media with 3% w/v regenerated root tip cells showed 26 number of sucrose for 6-8 wk. Each value represents the mean±SE. Means chromosome in somatic cells (2n=26; Fig. 1g), having different letters in superscript are significantly different indicating 13 chromosomes in pollen mother cells from each other (p≤0.05) according to Duncan’s multiple range (n=13), which perfectly matched the indicated number test. of chromosomes found in the flower bud. Detailed the species of Swertia, i.e., S. bimaculata and S. chirata, karyotypic analysis revealed 16 median to nearly when medium was enriched with additional KNO3. median, 6 sub median and 4 sub terminal chromosomes. Regenerated shoots isolated from the culture were Average chromosome length varied from 7.03-10.93 µm placed on BM with or without IAA or IBA. Healthy and total chromatin length was 114.46 µm. Meiotic roots were induced in about 100% shoots on BM chromosome number (n=13) and somatic chromosome within 4-5 wk of culture under a photoperiod of 16 h number (2n=26) of S. bimaculata reported earlier by light/8 h dark cycles (Fig. 1c). Although various Shigenobu6 was, thus, in conformity with the present concentrations of IAA or IBA were able to induce studies, while it contradicts the report of Roy et al5. The roots within 3-4 wk of cultures, but their effects were present studies further reaffirm the numerical stability of varied and lesser in comparison to BM alone the species over a long period of time. The stability of (Table 2). It is interesting to note here that, in our the regenerated plants at the chromosomal level has earlier studies, BM alone could not support root direct relationship with the protocol system used. Thus induction with S. chirata11. Complete regenerated the present protocol proves to be very efficient and plants were kept on BM for another 3 wk for their repeatable and can be used for large scale conservation growth and development prior to their transfer in pots of the Swertia germplasm. having a mixture of soil+sand+compost (1:1:1). In conclusion, the present study describes a simple, Hardening was performed inside a growth chamber efficient, reproducible protocol for the production of having 80-90% humidity. Eighty to ninety per cent stable diploid S. bimaculata plants. The complete plants survived after hardening (Fig.1d, e) and then protocol of plant production requires 20 wk time. The were ready to be transferred to the field. chromosomal database prepared would be useful for Meiotic chromosome (n) analysis from flower buds any future studies. of donor plant and somatic chromosome (2n) analysis from randomly selected root tips of in vitro Acknowledgement regenerated plants were carried out to prepare a well T B Jha acknowledges Council of Scientific and documented chromosomal database in this species for Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi for financial the first time (Figs 1f & g). Meiotic analysis from help and authors appreciate the help rendered by donor plants revealed 13 bivalents chromosomes Dr A Ghorai and Mrs P Mukherjee of the Department (n=13; Fig. 1f), indicating 26 somatic chromosomes of Botany, Presidency University, Kolkata in the (2n=26). Further, chromosomal analysis from in vitro preparation of the manuscript. DAFADAR & JHA: IN VITRO PROPAGATION OF S. BIMACULATA HOOK.f. & THOMS. 299

References (Publ. No.: WO/2003/045132 A1) 2003. (www.wipo. 1 Brahmachari G, Mandal S, Gangopadhyay A, Gorai D, int/patentscope/ search/ en/WO2003045132) Mukhopadhyay B et al, Swertia (): Chemical 10 Joshi P & Dhawan V, Axillary multiplication of Swertia and pharmacological aspects, Chem Biodivers, 1 (2004) chirayita (Roxb. ex Fleming) H. Karst., a critically 1627-1651. endangered medicinal herb of temperate Himalayas, 2 Suryawanshi S, Asthana R K & Gupta R C, Simultaneous In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant, 43 (2007) 631-638. estimation of mangiferin and four secoiridoid glycosides in 11 Chaudhuri R K, Pal A & Jha T B, Production of genetically rat plasma using liquid chromatography tandem mass uniform plants from nodal explants of Swertia chirata spectrometry and its application to pharmacokinetic study of Buch.-Ham. ex Wall.—A critically endangered medicinal herbal preparation, J Chromatography B (Analyt Technol herb, In vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant, 43 (2007) 467-472. Biomed Life Sci), 858 (2007) 211-219. 12 Chaudhuri R K, Pal A & Jha T B, Conservation of Swertia 3 Phoboo S, Pinto M S, Bhowmik P C, Jha P & Shetty K, chirata through direct shoot multiplication from leaf Quantification of major phytochemicals of Swertia explants, Plant Biotechnol Rep, 2 (2008) 213-218. chirayita, a medicinal plant from nepal, Ecoprint, 17 13 Chaudhuri, R K, Pal A & Jha T B, Regeneration and (2010) 59-68. characterization of Swertia chirata Buch.-Ham. ex Wall. 4 Ghosal S, Sharma P V & Chaudhuri R K, Xanthones of plants from immature seed cultures, Sci Hortic, 120 (2009) Swertia bimaculata, Phytochemistry, 14 (1975) 2671-2675. 107-114. 5 Roy S C, Ghose S & Chatterjee A, Chromosome reports for 14 Balaraju K, Agastian P & S Ignacimuthu, Micropropagation Swertia bimaculata, in Tropicos-Missouri Botanical Garden, of Swertia chirata Buch.-Ham. ex Wall.: A critically 1988. endangered medicinal herb, Acta Physiol Plant, 31 (2009) 6 Shigenobu Y, Chromosome reports for Swertia bimaculata, 487-494. in Tropicos-Missouri Botanical Garden, 1982 & 1983. 15 Lee E C M & de Fossard R A, Some factors affecting 7 Miura H, Ida M, Kitamura Y & Sugii M, Studies on the multiple bud formation of strawberry (X Fragaria ananassa tissue culture requirement of Swertia japonica Makino (II). Duchesne) in vitro, Acta Hortic, 78 (1977) 187-195. A comparison of constituents between callus cultures of 16 Jha T B & Sen S K, Micropropagation of an elite Darjeeling various organs of the original plant, Shoyakugaku Zasshi, 32 tea clone, Plant Cell Rep, 11 (1992) 101-104. (1978) 90-95. 17 Wirtzens B, Scrowcroft W R, Downes R W & Larkin P L, 8 Wawrosh C, Maskay N & Kopp B, Micropropagation of the Tissue culture and plant regeneration from sunflower threatened Nepalease medicinal plant Swertia chirata (Helianthus annuus) and interspecific hybrids (H. tuberosum Buch.-Ham. ex Wall., Plant Cell Rep, 18 (1999) 997-1001. x H. annuus), Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult, 13 (1988) 61-76. 9 Ahuja A, Koul S, Koul B L, Verma N K et al, Media 18 Ramage C M & Richard R W, Mineral nutrient and plant composition for faster propagation of Swertia chirayita morphogenesis, In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant, 38 (2002) 116-12.