Basic Research Needs Workshop on Compact Accelerators for Security and Medicine Tools for the 21St Century

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Basic Research Needs Workshop on Compact Accelerators for Security and Medicine Tools for the 21St Century Basic Research Needs Workshop on Compact Accelerators for Security and Medicine Tools for the 21st Century May 6-8, 2019 On the cover: 1. Material testing under extreme conditions is essential for predicting the performance of mission-critical components for security. (Image credit: D. Funk, Los Alamos National Laboratory) 2. Additive Manufacturing offers the possibility of “printing” complex parts from a variety of materials. Inspecting finished parts requires a new generation of high brightness x-ray sources. 1 (Image credit: Los Alamos National Laboratory) 3. Mobile VACIS system taking gamma-ray image of a truck. (Image 2 credit: Los Alamos National Laboratory, 5 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cargo_scanning#/media/File: Mobile_VACIS_Gamma-ray_System.jpeg) 3 4. Comparative dose distribution in VMAT (volumetric modulated 4 arc therapy) & h-VMAT (hybrid-volumetric modulated arc therapy in bilateral breast cancer radiotherapy (Image credit: S.B. Subramanian, et al., Cureus 2016, 8, 12, e914, Creative Commons License) 5. Electric field lines and modulus of the electric field generated by a (negative) charge first moving at constant speed and then stopping quickly to show the generated bremsstrahlung (“braking”) radiation. This process is widely used to produce x-rays. (Image credit: Jacopo Bertolotti, 29 October 2018, Creative Commons License https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bremsstrahlung.gif) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: This workshop was sponsored by the Department of Energy Office of Science, the National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute, the Department of Homeland Security Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction Office, the Department of Energy Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Office, and the Department of Defense Office of Naval Research. DISCLAIMER: This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by agencies of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by tradename, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government. 2 Basic Research Needs Workshop on Compact Accelerators for Security and Medicine Report of the Department of Energy Office of Science Workshop May 6-8, 2019 Chair Michael Fazio, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Co-Chairs George Laramore, University of Washington Suresh Pillai, Texas A&M University Panel Leads Panel 1: Security Application Ahmed Badruzzaman, Pacific Consultants and Engineers Harry Martz, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Panel 2: Medical Applications Jeff Buchsbaum, National Cancer Institute David Jaffray, MD Anderson Cancer Center Mary-Keara Boss, Colorado State University Panel 3: Materials and Sources for Accelerators Andrea Schmidt, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Jeff Calame, Naval Research Laboratory Panel 4: Computer Design and Control of Accelerators Sandra Beidron John Cary, University of Colorado, Boulder Panel 5: Engineering for Low-Cost, Rugged Accelerators Mark Curtin Arlyn Antolak, Sandia National Laboratory Panel 6: Detector Technologies Anna Erickson, Georgia Institute of Technology Ron Tosh, National Institute of Standards and Technology Panel 7: Future Accelerator Concepts Tony Ting, Naval Research Laboratory (retired) George Neil, Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility (retired) 3 Plenary Speakers Norm Coleman, National Cancer Institute Eric Ford, University of Washington James S. Welsh, Edwards Hines V. A. Hospital Ahmed Badruzzaman, Pacific Consultants and Engineers David Funk, Los Alamos National Laboratory Shima Shayanfar, General Mills Corporation Richard Vojtech, Department of Homeland Security Report Writing This report was prepared by the workshop chairs, panel leads, and panelists, with input from the workshop observers and broader community. Please see appendices A and B for a full list. Office of Science Leads Kramer Akli, Fusion Energy Sciences Eric Colby, High Energy Physics Manouchehr Farkhondeh, Nuclear Physics L. K. Len, High Energy Physics Eliane Lessner, Basic Energy Sciences Co-Sponsoring Federal Agency Leads Lance Garrison, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Donny Hornback, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Keith Jankowski, Department of Homeland Security Namdoo Moon, Department of Homeland Security Quentin Saulter, Office of Naval Research Frederik Tovesson, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Mark Wrobel, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Special Assistance Administrative Christie Ashton, High Energy Physics Queenie Huang, Stanford University Donna Nevels and Daisy Sauceman, ORISE Editorial/Publication Tiffani R. Conner, ORISE In memorium Tony Faucette (1971-2019) 4 Executive Summary Accelerator-based radiation sources are ubiquitous tools for imaging and treatment in the fields of medicine and security that save millions of lives, impact billions of dollars of commercial goods annually, and fulfill a critical role in US national security. Today’s commercially available accelerator technology has fallen significantly behind the state-of-the-art. Advancing and transferring state-of- the-art compact accelerator technology into broader use holds the promise of achieving greater control, power, and automation, which can significantly enhance society’s ability to sense and control the world around us. The Workshop identified a wealth of opportunities to advance these technologies from today’s commercial baselines, largely based on half-century old developments, by employing emerging concepts in charged particle acceleration and radiation generation and detection, along with modern ways of thinking about and utilizing developments in systems engineering, advanced materials, supply chain management, manufacturing, advanced computation, energy storage, and artificial intelligence. Many of the most important applications across security and medicine could be significantly impacted in the near term by moving advanced component and system technologies out of scientific research labs and by developing use-inspired benchtop demonstrators1 in the next 5 years. On a somewhat longer timescale truly revolutionary impacts could be achieved, such as compact, narrowband coherent x-ray sources for inspecting computer chips, high contrast imaging of nuclear materials, and endoscopically mounted accelerators for cancer therapy. Electron beam and x-ray technologies can play a major role in reducing the national security threat by eliminating reliance on radioactive isotopes such as 60Co for medical treatment and industrial applications such as medical device sterilization, food processing, and sterile insect technology. Similarly, accelerator technology-based x-ray and neutron sources can have an immediate application for exquisite non-destructive characterization which is the cornerstone of advanced manufacturing, assuring the integrity of electronic supply chains, nuclear non-proliferation treaty verification and stockpile stewardship, and other security applications such as port of entry security, emergency response and radioactive waste storage. The oil and gas industry, which is of immense strategic value to the US, can also benefit from major technological advances in accelerator technology for improved geophysical well logging measurements. Ionizing radiation has a wide-spread role in treating cancer patients. In developed countries, this is most often delivered with multi-megavolt x-rays from linear accelerators but elsewhere in the world gamma rays from radioactive sources such as 60Co are used. Economic factors such as initial cost of equipment and reliability are important factors in this selection. From a security point of view, it would be advantageous to replace these gamma ray sources with low cost, reliable, self-diagnosing linear accelerator systems that can be operated and maintained by intermediate level personnel. A modular design with readily available and interchangeable components and upgradable software is critical to this. Currently radiotherapeutic treatments are prescribed, planned, and executed in terms of physical radiation doses. What is needed is to work in terms of biologically effective dose distributions, both for tumors and for the critical organ systems that must be protected that also receive radiation during the treatment process. Commercial accelerators and sensors must be developed to allow the necessary research and modelling to be 1 Specifically, “TRL-4”. TRL, or Technology Readiness Level identifies the maturity of a particular technology for a particular purpose. See DOE G 413-3-4A for definitions. 5 carried out and validated in animal models and then translated into clinical practice. All this requires the dose to be produced, measured, and controlled with high resolution in space and time at the biological site in the patient and even to provide feedback that alters the treatment in real time for optimal effect. All the above security and medical applications require compact accelerators ranging in power and size from megawatt beams at the several-meter-scale to watt beams at the centimeter-scale along with innovative detector technologies. A common theme emerging across
Recommended publications
  • Institute for Clinical and Economic Review
    INSTITUTE FOR CLINICAL AND ECONOMIC REVIEW FINAL APPRAISAL DOCUMENT BRACHYTHERAPY & PROTON BEAM THERAPY FOR TREATMENT OF CLINICALLY-LOCALIZED, LOW-RISK PROSTATE CANCER December 22, 2008 Senior Staff Daniel A. Ollendorf, MPH, ARM Chief Review Officer Julia Hayes, MD Lead Decision Scientist Pamela McMahon, PhD Sr. Decision Scientist Steven D. Pearson, MD, MSc President, ICER Associate Staff Michelle Kuba, MPH Sr. Technology Analyst Angela Tramontano, MPH Research Assistant © ICER, 2008 1 CONTENTS About ICER .................................................................................................................................. 3 Acknowledgments ...................................................................................................................... 4 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... 5 Evidence Review Group Deliberation.................................................................................. 15 ICER Integrated Evidence Rating.......................................................................................... 21 Evidence Review Group Members........................................................................................ 24 Appraisal Overview.................................................................................................................. 28 Background ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 小型飛翔体/海外 [Format 2] Technical Catalog Category
    小型飛翔体/海外 [Format 2] Technical Catalog Category Airborne contamination sensor Title Depth Evaluation of Entrained Products (DEEP) Proposed by Create Technologies Ltd & Costain Group PLC 1.DEEP is a sensor analysis software for analysing contamination. DEEP can distinguish between surface contamination and internal / absorbed contamination. The software measures contamination depth by analysing distortions in the gamma spectrum. The method can be applied to data gathered using any spectrometer. Because DEEP provides a means of discriminating surface contamination from other radiation sources, DEEP can be used to provide an estimate of surface contamination without physical sampling. DEEP is a real-time method which enables the user to generate a large number of rapid contamination assessments- this data is complementary to physical samples, providing a sound basis for extrapolation from point samples. It also helps identify anomalies enabling targeted sampling startegies. DEEP is compatible with small airborne spectrometer/ processor combinations, such as that proposed by the ARM-U project – please refer to the ARM-U proposal for more details of the air vehicle. Figure 1: DEEP system core components are small, light, low power and can be integrated via USB, serial or Ethernet interfaces. 小型飛翔体/海外 Figure 2: DEEP prototype software 2.Past experience (plants in Japan, overseas plant, applications in other industries, etc) Create technologies is a specialist R&D firm with a focus on imaging and sensing in the nuclear industry. Createc has developed and delivered several novel nuclear technologies, including the N-Visage gamma camera system. Costainis a leading UK construction and civil engineering firm with almost 150 years of history.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Power
    No.59 z iii "Ill ~ 2 er0 Ill Ill 0 Nuclear Family Pia nning p3 Chernobyl Broadsheet ·, _ I. _ . ~~~~ George Pritchar d speaks CONTENTS COMMENT The important nuclear development since the Nuclear Family Planning 3 last SCRAM Journal was the Government's The CEGB's plans, and the growing opposition, after Sizewell B by go ahead for Sizewell B: the world's first HUGH RICHARDS. reactor order since Chernobyl, and Britain's News 4-6 first since the go ahead was given to Torness Accidents Will Happen 1 and Heysham 2 in 1978. Of great concern is Hinkley Seismic Shocker 8-9 the CEGB's announced intention to build "a A major article on seismic safety of nuclear plants in which JAMES small fanilty• of PWRs, starting with Hinkley GARRETT reveals that Hinkley Point C. At the time of the campaign In the Point sits on a geological fault. south west to close the Hinkley A Magnox Trouble at Trawsfynydd 10-11 station, and .a concerted push in Scotland to A summary of FoE's recent report on increasing radiation levels from prevent the opening of Torness, another Trawsfynydd's by PATRICK GREEN. nuclear announcement is designed to divide Pandora's POX 12 and demoralise the opposition. But, it should The debate over plutonium transport make us more determined. The article on the to and from Dounreay continues by facing page gives us hope: the local PETE MUTTON. authorities on Severnside are joining forces CHERNOBYL BROADSHEET to oppose Hinkley C, and hopefully they will Cock-ups and Cover-ups work closely with local authorities in other "Sacrificed to • • • Nuclear Power" threatened areas - Lothian Region, The Soviet Experience Northumberland, the County Council Coalition "An Agonising Decision• 13 against waste dumping and the Nuclear Free GEORGE PRITCHARD explains why Zones - to formulate a national anti-nuclear he left Greenpeoce and took a job strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Nominations for President
    ISSN 0002-9920 (print) ISSN 1088-9477 (online) of the American Mathematical Society September 2013 Volume 60, Number 8 The Calculus Concept Inventory— Measurement of the Effect of Teaching Methodology in Mathematics page 1018 DML-CZ: The Experience of a Medium- Sized Digital Mathematics Library page 1028 Fingerprint Databases for Theorems page 1034 A History of the Arf-Kervaire Invariant Problem page 1040 About the cover: 63 years since ENIAC broke the ice (see page 1113) Solve the differential equation. Solve the differential equation. t ln t dr + r = 7tet dt t ln t dr + r = 7tet dt 7et + C r = 7et + C ln t ✓r = ln t ✓ WHO HAS THE #1 HOMEWORK SYSTEM FOR CALCULUS? THE ANSWER IS IN THE QUESTIONS. When it comes to online calculus, you need a solution that can grade the toughest open-ended questions. And for that there is one answer: WebAssign. WebAssign’s patent pending grading engine can recognize multiple correct answers to the same complex question. Competitive systems, on the other hand, are forced to use multiple choice answers because, well they have no choice. And speaking of choice, only WebAssign supports every major textbook from every major publisher. With new interactive tutorials and videos offered to every student, it’s not hard to see why WebAssign is the perfect answer to your online homework needs. It’s all part of the WebAssign commitment to excellence in education. Learn all about it now at webassign.net/math. 800.955.8275 webassign.net/math WA Calculus Question ad Notices.indd 1 11/29/12 1:06 PM Notices 1051 of the American Mathematical Society September 2013 Communications 1048 WHAT IS…the p-adic Mandelbrot Set? Joseph H.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kitchen Fire Prevention Technologies Workshop Took Place February 19, 2010 at the Madison Lowes Hotel in Washington DC
    Kitchen Fire Prevention Technologies Workshop Report November, 2010 Table of Contents Page Abstract ...............................................................................................................................1 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................2 Introduction The Problem ...........................................................................................................3 Previous Research ..................................................................................................4 Workshop Objectives.............................................................................................6 Workshop Process and Proceedings ....................................................................7 Summaries of Presentations Mr. David Dini, UL ................................................................................................7 Mr. Wayne Morris, AHAM ..................................................................................8 Breakout Sessions...............................................................................................................9 Breakout Group Reports .................................................................................................11 References .........................................................................................................................16 Appendix Materials I Invitation and Agenda.......................................................................................17
    [Show full text]
  • Marisela Correa Workforce Program Manager (915) 887-2219 [email protected]
    304 Texas Ave., Suite 1400 | El Paso, TX 79901 | 915.887.2600 | www.borderplexjobs.com January 13, 2021 From: rev. Jan. 29, 2021 Marisela Correa Workforce Program Manager (915) 887-2219 [email protected] Sub: Quote Request Dear Training Providers, Workforce Solutions Borderplex (WSB) is seeking quotes for a two-tier level for construction related training program. Level I: Training providers to provide single skill mini workshops that focus on teaching essential basic home repairs and maintenance to women homeowners and women in our community. WSB recognizes that ability to obtain these skills increases the participants skills, increases one’s sense of self-worth which leads to feeling empowered, more self-sufficient in home maintenance. Furthermore, these workshops provide the opportunity to generated interest in learning more about specific occupations in the construction industry and pursuing a career or become an entrepreneur. Level II: WSB is also seeking quotes from training providers to provide Construction Industry recognized certification training. Workforce Solutions Borderplex is committed to continue to develop ways to spark women interest in traditionally male dominated industries, support advancement and grow our business community. Please view the attached specifications/scope of work for detailed information on the services we are seeking. We request that you consider this information and send us your quote at your earliest convenience but no later than 2:00 p.m. on January 29, 2021 via the e-mail address listed above. However, quotes will also be accepted on a continuous basis beyond the initial deadline. Before the commencement of services and the exchange and/or allocation of funds occurs, WSB expects to enter into an agreement with the selected training provider(s) or to assign the agreement to Dynamic Workforce Solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • A 50-100 Kwe Gas-Cooled Reactor for Use on Mars
    SANDIA REPORT SAND2006-2189 Unlimited Release Printed April 2006 A 50-100 kWe Gas-cooled Reactor For Use On Mars Curtis D. Peters Prepared by Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185 and Livermore, California 94550 Sandia is a multiprogram laboratory operated by Sandia Corporation, a Lockheed Martin Company, for the United States Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under Contract DE-AC04-94AL85000. Approved for public release; further dissemination unlimited. Issued by Sandia National Laboratories, operated for the United States Department of Energy by Sandia Corporation. NOTICE: This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government, nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors, or their employees, make any warranty, express or implied, or assume any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represent that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government, any agency thereof, or any of their contractors or subcontractors. The views and opinions expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government, any agency thereof, or any of their contractors. Printed in the United States of America. This report has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Flood Greenhouse Effect Plutonium Flights of Fancy Ministry
    ., Th~ Safe Energy ,J - Journal - July I August 19 88 75p Before the Flood Greenhouse Effect Plutonium Fl ights of Fancy Ministry of Truth - Chernobyl Lies CONTENTS COMMENT Flights of Fancy? 3 In the words of Or Tom Wheldon, at the Fourth STEVE MARTIN reviews the regulatory Annual Low Level Radiation and Health Conference log-jam in the US over planned held in Stirling, to say that radiation has existed in plutonium flights from Europe to Japan. the environment since the dawn of humankind and News 4-7 is therefore not a problem is just as daft as saying Ministry of Truth 8-9 that crocodiles have been around since the begin­ PATRICK GREEN accuses MAFF of ning with no perceived adverse effects - they will trying to rewrite history in their evidence to the Agriculture Com­ still bite your leg off, given half a chance. mittee. The Irresistible Force 10-11 The second report on the incidence of childhood meets the Immovable Object leukaemia near Dounreay from COMARE, of which ANDREW HOLMES asks what will Or Wheldon is a member, is a valuable contribution happen to nuclear research after privatisation. to the debate; but don't forget what happened to Snug as a Bug ••• 12 the 1976 Flowers Report. For the uninitiated, DON ARNOTT assesses the evidence Flowers recommended, among other things, that no that bacteria have been found in the large scale nuclear power ordering programme be burned-out core of the Three Mile Is­ land reactor. embarked on until the nuclear waste problem had Milk of Human Kindness? 14-15 been solved.
    [Show full text]
  • Low Enriched Uranium Conversion Preliminary Safety Analysis Report for the MIT Research Reactor
    LEU PSAR 6 DEC 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................... a ••••••• i 1.0 MIT Research Reactor·······························································"······························· 1-1 1.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Summary and Conclusions of Principal Safety Considerations .............................. 1-1 1.2.1 Consequences from Operation and Use ............................................................. 1-1 1.2.2 Safety Considerations on Choice of Site, Fue~ and Power Level.. ..................... 1-2 1.2.3 Inherent Safety Features ................................................................................... 1-3 1.2.4 Design Features for Safe Operation and Shutdown............................................ 1-4 1.2.5 Potential Accidents ........................................................................................... 1-5 1.3 General Description of the Facility ........................................................................ 1-6 1.4 Shared Facilities and Equipment.. ....................................................................... 1-10 1.5 Comparison with Similar Facilities ..................................................................... 1-11 1.6 Summary of Operation ......................................................................................... 1-11 1.7 Nuclear Waste Policy Act
    [Show full text]
  • Downbeat.Com September 2010 U.K. £3.50
    downbeat.com downbeat.com september 2010 2010 september £3.50 U.K. DownBeat esperanza spalDing // Danilo pérez // al Di Meola // Billy ChilDs // artie shaw septeMBer 2010 SEPTEMBER 2010 � Volume 77 – Number 9 President Kevin Maher Publisher Frank Alkyer Editor Ed Enright Associate Editor Aaron Cohen Art Director Ara Tirado Production Associate Andy Williams Bookkeeper Margaret Stevens Circulation Manager Kelly Grosser AdVertisiNg sAles Record Companies & Schools Jennifer Ruban-Gentile 630-941-2030 [email protected] Musical Instruments & East Coast Schools Ritche Deraney 201-445-6260 [email protected] Classified Advertising Sales Sue Mahal 630-941-2030 [email protected] offices 102 N. Haven Road Elmhurst, IL 60126–2970 630-941-2030 Fax: 630-941-3210 http://downbeat.com [email protected] customer serVice 877-904-5299 [email protected] coNtributors Senior Contributors: Michael Bourne, John McDonough, Howard Mandel Atlanta: Jon Ross; Austin: Michael Point; Boston: Fred Bouchard, Frank-John Hadley; Chicago: John Corbett, Alain Drouot, Michael Jackson, Peter Margasak, Bill Meyer, Mitch Myers, Paul Natkin, How- ard Reich; Denver: Norman Provizer; Indiana: Mark Sheldon; Iowa: Will Smith; Los Angeles: Earl Gibson, Todd Jenkins, Kirk Silsbee, Chris Walker, Joe Woodard; Michigan: John Ephland; Minneapolis: Robin James; Nashville: Robert Doerschuk; New Orleans: Erika Goldring, David Kunian; New York: Alan Bergman, Herb Boyd, Bill Douthart, Ira Gitler, Eugene Gologursky, Norm Harris, D.D. Jackson, Jimmy Katz, Jim Macnie, Ken Micallef, Jennifer
    [Show full text]
  • Studies in Basidiodendron Eyrei and Similar-Looking Taxa (Auriculariales, Basidiomycota)
    Botany Studies in Basidiodendron eyrei and similar-looking taxa (Auriculariales, Basidiomycota) Journal: Botany Manuscript ID cjb-2020-0045.R2 Manuscript Type: Article Date Submitted by the 14-Jul-2020 Author: Complete List of Authors: Spirin , Viacheslav ; Botany Unit (Mycology), Finnish Museum of Natural History, University of Helsinki., Malysheva, Vera; Komarov Botanical Institute RAS, Laboratory of Systematic and Geography of Fungi Mendes Alvarenga,Draft Renato Lúcio ; Universidade Federal de Pernambuco Centro de Biociencias, Micologia Kotiranta, Heikki; Finnish Environment Institute Larsson, Karl-Henrik; Natural History Museum , University of Oslo, Keyword: heterobasidiomycetes, phylogeny, taxonomy Is the invited manuscript for consideration in a Special Not applicable (regular submission) Issue? : https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/botany-pubs Page 1 of 40 Botany Studies in Basidiodendron eyrei and similar-looking taxa (Auriculariales, Basidiomycota) Viacheslav Spirin1, Vera Malysheva2, Renato Lucio Mendes-Alvarenga3, Heikki Kotiranta4, Karl-Henrik Larsson5,6 1Botany Unit (Mycology), Finnish Museum of Natural History, University of Helsinki. P.O. Box 7, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland. e-mail: [email protected] 2Komarov Botanical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Prof. Popova Str., 197376 St. Petersburg, Russia. e-mail: [email protected] 3Departamento de Micologia, Centro de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Av. da Engenharia s/n, Recife, Pernambuco,Draft 50740-570, Brazil. e-mail: [email protected] 4Finnish Environment Institute, Latokartanonkaari 11, 00790 Helsinki, Finland. e-mail: [email protected] 5Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1172, Blindern, 0318 Oslo, Norway. e- mail: [email protected] 6Gothenburg Global Biodiversity Centre, Post Box 461, 40530 Gothenburg, Sweden Corresponding author: Viacheslav Spirin.
    [Show full text]
  • Advances in Small Modular Reactor Technology Developments
    Advances in Small Modular Reactor Technology Developments Advances in Small Modular Reactor Technology Developments Technology in Small Modular Reactor Advances A Supplement to: IAEA Advanced Reactors Information System (ARIS) 2018 Edition For further information: Nuclear Power Technology Development Section (NPTDS) Division of Nuclear Power IAEA Department of Nuclear Energy International Atomic Energy Agency Vienna International Centre PO Box 100 1400 Vienna, Austria Telephone: +43 1 2600-0 Fax: +43 1 2600-7 Email: [email protected] Internet: http://www.iaea.org Printed by IAEA in Austria September 2018 18-02989E ADVANCES IN SMALL MODULAR REACTOR TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENTS 2018 Edition A Supplement to: IAEA Advanced Reactors Information System (ARIS) http://aris.iaea.org DISCLAIMER This is not an official IAEA publication. The material has not undergone an official review by the IAEA. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the International Atomic Energy Agency or its Member States and remain the responsibility of the contributors. Although great care has been taken to maintain the accuracy of information contained in this publication, neither the IAEA nor its Member States assume any responsibility for consequences which may arise from its use. The use of particular designations of countries or territories does not imply any judgement by the publisher, the IAEA, as to the legal status of such countries or territories, of their authorities and institutions or of the delimitation of their boundaries. The mention of names of specific companies or products (whether or not indicated as registered) does not imply any intention to infringe proprietary rights, nor should it be construed as an endorsement or recommendation on the part of the IAEA.
    [Show full text]