IP!
W'
I
MUNICIPAL DISTRICT OP BRAZEAU NO. 77
COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
90 10 18 (October 18, 1990) 10:00 a.m.
1
m
|
m 1 MUNICIPAL DISTRICT OF BRAZEAU NO. 77
M REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
DATE: 90 10 18 TIME: 10:00 A.M. PLACE: M.D. ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Page Nos. Call t0 0rder
Present W 1. Additions to the Agenda
2. Adoption of the Agenda
1-9 3. Adoption of Minutes - 90 10 11 Regular Council Meeting
4. Adoption of Minutes - Public Hearing for a Proposed P --0-16- Industrial Landfill Site - Pembina Oil Separators - NE 29-48-7 W5M - held on 90 10 03.
5. Environmentally Sensitive Areas Study Program pv ) - Appointment with Mr. Gary Buchanan at 10:00 I a.m.
6. Proposed Subdivisions I (a) 90/91 YH012-41 - Evan and Linda Davis
17-23 - Report and recommendation attached.
Tabled from the 90 10 11 Regular Council [ Meeting.
(b) 90/91 YH085-41 - NW 20-50-7 W5M - Olga Mulyk
{ - Report to be provided on the addendum.
Tabled from the 90 10 11 Regular Council m Meeting. c [ (c) 90/91 YH090-41 - Pt. NE 21-49-5 W5M - Lagoon Site, Lindale School p 24 — 29 - Report and recommendation attached.
7. Proposed Wellsite and Access Road - LSD 16, Section 6-50-10 W5M (Cynthia) - P0C0 Petroleums Ltd.
F» 30-32 Report and recommendation attached.
8. Renewal of Surface Materials Lease SML 800063 - LSD 1 of SE 14-47-11 W5M - Tall Pine Timber Co. Ltd.
33 - 38 Report and recommendation attached.
9. Date Changes
(a) 90 11 21 Regular Council Meeting
(b) 90 12 04 Team Meeting
Proposed Date - 90 12 10
./2 Page Nos, REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING - 2 - 90 10 18
(c) 90 12 13 Regular Council Meeting
Proposed Date - 90 12 17
(d) 90 12 26 Regular Council Meeting
39 - 40 10. By-Law No. 111-90: Respecting Nuisances and Unsightly and Untidy Premises.
By-Law attached.
11. Schedule of Fees for 1991 ••p 41 Report and Recommendation attached.
42 - 51 By-Law No. 115-90: To Establish a Schedule of Fees
12. Management of Wetlands - Workshops to be held in late October and November, 1990.
52 - 53 Letter from the Alberta Water Resources Commission dated 90 10 04 attached.
13. Recycling Council of Alberta - Semi-annual Meeting - 90 11 10 and 90 11 11 in Edmonton.
54 - 59 Letter from the Recycling Council of Alberta dated 90 10 09 attached.
14. Team Building Seminar - 90 11 12
60 Notice of Seminar dated 90 10 10 attached.
61 - 68 1990 Fall A.A.M.D. & C. Convention Highlights dated 90 10 10 attached.
15. 1991 Road Program Submission to Alberta Transportation
16. Procedural By-Law
PLEASE BRING YOUR COPY.
17. Correspondence/Items for Information
69 - 70 (a) Letter from Mina Storry, Municipal Advisor, Alberta Municipal Affairs, dated 90 10 09 regarding the Advisory visit.
71 - 72 (b) News Highlights from the A.A.M.D. & C. dated 90 10 10. pa 73 - 76 (c) Minutes of the Regular Municipal Planning Commission Meeting held on 90 09 13.
77 - 85 (d) Memorandum from the A.A.M.D. & C. dated 90 10 10 regarding a report entitled "Freedom to Choose" - a revised "Crow Benefit".
Major portion of report is a separate attached. Members of the A.S.B. have previously received a copy of this Report.
.../3 Page Nos. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING - 3 - 90 10 18
86 (e) Award of Merit for the M.D.'s contribution to the student summer employment program from the Honourable Joe Clark, M.P. of Yellowhead dated September, 1990. pi 18. Road Tour - 11:00 a.m.
Addendum
wt
•ffifi
i^S>
/S>
L•
'Sf
ft: I. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF THE MUNICIPAL DISTRICT OF BRAZEAU NO. 77, HELD AT THE M.D. ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, DRAYTON VALLEY, ALBERTA, ON THURSDAY, 90 10 11
CALL TO ORDER H. Rondeau, Chairman, called the meeting to order at 9:30 a.m.
PRESENT H. Rondeau, Reeve B. Booth, Deputy Reeve W. Tweedle, Councillor N. Norton, Councillor J. Coombes, Councillor J. Eriksson, Municipal Manager J. Andrew, Recording Secretary
Also in attendance were:
D. Roberge, Planning and Development Officer R. Tatro, Director of Public Works T. Fleming, Assistant Director of Public Works B. Wakefield, Accountant 0. Mulyk, Subdivision Applicant K. Smith, J.K. Smith and Associates flBl E. Davis, Subdivision Applicant R. Samis, Subdivision Applicant D. Pinkoski, Western Review
ABSENT B. Fleming, Director of Finance and Administration
ADDITIONS TO 546/90 Moved by N. Norton that the agenda for the 90 AND ADOPTION 10 11 Regular Council Meeting be adopted with OF AGENDA the following amendment and additions:
Amendment
Item No. 21 on the Regular Agenda should be |P» Item No. 22.
Additions
Addendum Hi 31. Airport Terminal Building Opening 32. M.D. of Rocky Rapids Safe
CARRIED.
ADOPTION OF 547/90 Moved by W. Tweedle that the minutes of the 90 MINUTES 09 26 Regular Council Meeting be adopted as presented.
CARRIED.
SUBDIVISION Proposed Subdivisions APPLICATIONS 90/91 YH075-41 - NE 4-50-7 W5M - Rod and Carla Hafner
Mr. Roberge reviewed the report and recommendation as presented to Council. 548/90 Moved by B. Booth that approval be granted to subdivision application 90/91 YH075-41 - NE 4- 50-7 W5M - Rod and Carla Hafner - subject to the following conditions:
(1) All taxes being paid.
...II -a- REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING -2- 90 1011
(2) Applicant enter into a Development Agreement with the Municipal District of Brazeau No. 77 pursuant to Section 92(1) of the Planning Act.
(3) Municipal Reserves be deferred proportionately.
CARRIED.
90/91 YH012-41 - NE 24-48-8 W5M - Evan and Linda Davis *i Mr. Davis and Mr. Smith attended the meeting at 9:30 a.m.
Mr. Roberge reviewed the report and recommendation as presented to Council.
Mr. Smith indicated that he did not feel that an Area Structure Plan is required. We feel that this will be the final and ultimate subdivision of this 1/4 section. The proposed subdivision consists of eight parcels which are all well over ten acres. No further subdivision is foreseen.
Mr. Davis indicated that he has spoken to the people in the area and has been advised that they do not want smaller subdivisions.
Mr. Eriksson indicated that perhaps this proposed subdivision should be discussed with the Area Planner rm from the Yellowhead Regional Planning Commission. | 549/90 Moved by W. Tweedle that subdivision application 90/91 YH012-41 - NE 24-48-8 W5M - Evan and Linda Davis - be tabled for further ^ review.
CARRIED. Mr. Davis left the meeting at 9:41 a.m. ]
Mr. Tatro attended the meeting at 9:42 a.m.
90/91 YH085-41 - NW 20-50-7 W5M - Olga Mulvk «*
Mrs. Mulyk attended the meeting at 9:30 a.m. Mr. Roberge reviewed the report and recommendation as ^ presented to Council. The proposal provides for the second and third parcels on the quarter.
Mr. Smith advised Council that the lot plan as provided is an accurate plan of the area. With regards to the ^ relocation of the accessory buildings they would be very ] difficult to move. Mrs. Mulyk has permission from the 5 adjacent landowner to have these buildings encroach on to their property. Mrs. Mulyk indicated that she would like to subdivide the j 7 acre parcel (Lot 2) so that she may give it to her son and would then sell the remaining quarter.
Discussion was held regarding the approval of the subdivision.
.../3 -3- REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING - 3 - 90 10 11
'M 550/90 Moved by N. Norton that subdivision application 90/91 YH085-41 - NW 20-50-7 W5M - Olga Mulyk - be tabled until the 90 10 18 Regular Council Meeting.
CARRIED.
Mrs. Mulyk left the meeting at 9:53 a.m.
90/91 YH086-41 - NE 21-48-7 W5M - Reginald and Marlene Samis
Mr. Samis attended the meeting at 9:30 a.m.
Mr. Roberge reviewed the report and recommendation as presented to Council.
•M Discussion was held regarding the legality of the access to the proposed parcel. 551/90 Moved by N. Norton that approval be granted of proposed subdivision 90/91 YH086-41 - NE 21- 48-7 W5M - Reginald and Marlene Samis - subject to the following conditions:
1. All taxes being paid. '3 2. 40m access shall be provided between the west boundary of proposed lot 1 and the west boundary of the quarter section or proof of legal access through a road use agreement must be provided;
3. Applicant shall enter into a Development Agreement with the Municipal District of Brazeau No. 77.
4. The east boundary of proposed lot 1 be adjusted to coincide with the top of the river valley.
CARRIED.
Mr. Smith and Mr. Samis left the meeting at 10:14 a.m. 'Wt MEMORANDUM Memorandum of Agreement (Lease) - Lindale Community OF AGREEMENT Association - Lot 17MR Plan 872 2239 - SW 29-49-5 W5M
Mr. Roberge reviewed the report and recommendation as presented to Council. 552/90 Moved by W. Tweedle that the Lease Agreement as attached be accepted by Council to replace the Golden Spur Gymkhana Club with the Lindale Roping Club.
CARRIED.
TOURIST ZONE Tourist Zone Affiliation AFFILIATION Mr. Eriksson reviewed the report and recommendation as presented to Council.
Discussion was held regarding the Municipal District becoming a member of both the Evergreen Tourist Association and the Battle River Tourist Association.
...Ik -M-
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING - 4 - 90 10 11
553/90 Moved by N. Norton that the Municipal District of Brazeau No. 77 join the Battle River Tourist Association and the Evergreen Tourist Association effective 91 01 01.
CARRIED.
Mr. Roberge left the meeting at 10:30 a.m.
TWO DAY Two Day Course - "Understanding Small Towns" 1 COURSE 554/90 Moved by B. Booth that the memorandum received from the Y.R.P.C. dated 90 09 28 regarding a two day course entitled "Understanding Small Towns" be received for information.
CARRIED.
REQUESTS FOR Landman - Word Processing Course - 90 10 11 and 90 10 12 TRAINING in Stony Plain
LANDMAN 555/90 Moved by B. Booth that authorization be given for Mr. Dean Stutheit, Landman, to attend a Word Processing Course on 90 10 11 and 90 10 12 in Stony Plain.
CARRIED.
DIRECTOR OF Director of Public Works - "Manager as Coach" - 90 10 25 PUBLIC WORKS in Calgary 556/90 Moved by B. Booth that authorization be given for Mr. Richard Tatro, Director of Public Works, to attend the "Manager as Coach" seminar on 90 10 25 in Calgary.
CARRIED.
UTILITY Utility Coordinator - "How to Manage Multiple Priorities" COORDINATOR - 90 11 28 in Edmonton 557/90 Moved by N. Norton that authorization be given for Mr. Rick Flikkema, Utility Coordinator, to attend the "How to Manage Multiple Priorities" course on 90 11 28 in Edmonton.
CARRIED.
LEADHAND OF Leadhand of Maintenance and Leadhand of Construction - MAINTENANCE "Supervise People Workshop" - 90 11 13 in Edmonton AND LEADHAND OF CONSTRUC 558/90 Moved by J. Coombes that authorization be given TION for the Leadhand of Maintenance and Leadhand of Construction, to attend the "Supervise People Workshop" on 90 11 13 in Edmonton.
CARRIED.
COMMUNITY Community Planning Association of Alberta - 1990 PLANNING Conference ASSOCIATION OF ALBERTA 559/90 Moved by N. Norton that authorization be given _-*5vN ANNUAL for members of Council, the Municipal Manager CONFERENCE and the Planning and Development Officer to 1990 attend the 1990 Conference of the Community Planning Association of Alberta in Red Deer on 90 10 24 to 90 10 26.
CARRIED.
./5 -5 —
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING - 5 - 90 10 11
p\ Mr. Terry Fleming attended the meeting at 10:35 a.m.
RECREATION Recreation and Parks Workshop AND PARKS WORKSHOP 560/90 Moved by W. Tweedle that authorization be given for members of Council and the Planning and Development Officer to attend the Recreation and Parks Workshop to be held on 90 11 24 in Stony Plain.
CARRIED.
CONFERENCE 'i^ Strategies for the Future of Rural Alberta Conference 561/90 Moved by J. Coombes that authorization be given for members of Council to attend the Strategies for the Future of Rural Alberta Conference in 'P^ Hanna, Alberta to be held on 90 10 24 to 90 10 26.
CARRIED.
MISCELLANEOUS Unratified Miscellaneous Agreements AGREEMENTS Mr. Tweedle indicated that he wished to be excused from this portion of the meeting as he was directly affected W> by one of the agreements.
562/90 Moved by N. Norton that Mr. Tweedle be excused from the Regular Council Meeting of 90 10 11 until a decision has been reached regarding the Unratified Miscellaneous Agreements.
CARRIED.
Mr. Tweedle left the meeting at 10:39 a.m.
563/90 Moved by J. Coombes that the attached list of miscellaneous agreements be ratified.
P CARRIED.
Mr. Tweedle returned to the meeting room at 10:41 a.m.
APPROVAL OF 564/90 Moved by B. Booth that the accounts, including ACCOUNTS those on the addendum, be approved.
CARRIED.
Mr. Wakefield attended the meeting at 10:42 a.m. Mr. Wakefield indicated that two additional cheques needed to be approved by Council. fflt* CHEQUE 565/90 Moved by N. Norton that the following cheques REQUESTS be approved:
#1249 to Latimer Construction - $110,618.49 #1250 to Miller Construction - $108,549.50
CARRIED. Mr. Tatro, Mr. Fleming and Mr. Wakefield left the meeting at 10:45 a.m.
...16
•01 -t-
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING - 6 - 90 10 11
CORPORATE Corporate Pooling POOLING Mr. Eriksson indicated that he is awaiting information from Dr. Al Anderson from the Twin Rivers School Division in order to provide data on the impact of Corporate Pooling.
566/90 Moved by N. Norton that the information provided by the A.A.M.D. & C. dated 90 09 28 regarding Corporate Pooling for Education be received for information.
CARRIED.
Mr. Tatro returned to the meeting at 10:47 a.m.
BIRCHWOOD Birchwood Village Greens VILLAGE GREENS Council reviewed a letter received from Mr. Stan Bucar representing Birchwood Village Greens dated 90 09 26 regarding their disaster assistance claim.
567/90 Moved by B. Booth that a letter be forwarded to the appropriate Minister urging the provincial government to expedite the disaster assistance claims for the July 1990 flood as quickly as possible.
CARRIED.
TEAM MEETING Team Meeting Date Change DATE CHANGE 568/90 Moved by N. Norton that the Team Meeting scheduled for 90 10 30 be changed to 90 10 31 commencing at 9:00 a.m.
CARRIED.
PUBLIC General Municipal Plan/Land Use By-Law/Area Structure HEARING Plans «
569/90 Moved by W. Tweedle that the Public Hearing for the General Municipal Plan/Land Use By-Law/Area Structure Plans be held on 90 11 07 commencing at 7:00 p.m.
CARRIED.
MUNICIPAL Municipal Committee COMMITTEE Mr. Coombes indicated that perhaps a Committee (called the Public Works Committee) could be formed and held once a month which would generally deal with Public Works items such as road maintenance, snowplowing, ditching programs, road tours, road priorities, etc.
Mr. Rondeau indicated that a consensus has been reached in the past where the Director of Public Works, Mr. Richard Tatro, would report to Council once a month, or as required, on the Public Works Department. Mr. Rondeau also indicated that other committees were already established to deal with this type of information. With regards to road tours, they could be held in the afternoon of days when Council Meetings are over in the morning.
...II 1 -~7 —
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING - 7 - 90 10 11
The majority of the Councillors present felt that there r were other adequate committees to deal with the public works items and that the reports from Mr. Tatro were very valuable.
570/90 Moved by J. Coombes that the information provided by members of Council regarding the establishment of a Public Works Committee be received for information.
CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Correspondence/Items for Information
571/90 Moved by W. Tweedle that the following items be received for information:
(a) News Highlights from the A.A.M.D. & C. dated 90 09 26.
(b) Letter from the County of Leduc No. 25 to the Pembina Valley Regional Ambulance Authority dated 90 09 26 regarding the Boundary Proposal.
(c) Letter from the Energy Resources Conservation Board dated 90 09 20 regarding the expansion of the Pembina Gas Processing Plant located in LSD 5-35-49- 6 W5M.
(d) Brochure from TIAALTA received on 90 09 17 entitled "Let's Talk Tourism".
(e) Letter to the Rt. Honourable Joe Clark from the Federal Minister of Fisheries and Oceans dated 90 09 27 regarding a launching facility at Willey West Park.
(f) News Release from the Economic Council of Canada dated 90 06 27 regarding "Council Outlines Local Development Proposals".
CARRIED.
REQUESTS FOR Utility Coordinator - Association of Alberta Utility TRAINING Officers' 17th Annual Conference - 90 11 19 to 90 11 20 in Red Deer
UTILITY 572/90 Moved by W. Tweedle that authorization be given COORDINATOR for Mr. Rick Flikkema, Utility Coordinator, to attend the Association of Alberta Utility Officers' 17th Annual Conference to be held on 90 11 19 to 90 11 20 in Red Deer.
CARRIED.
DIRECTOR OF Director of Public Works - "Training and Development of PUBLIC WORKS Public Works Employees" - 90 11 05 to 90 11 06 in Vancouver
Mr. Tatro reviewed the report and recommendation as presented to Council.
...18
T FS -8- REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING - 8 - 90 10 11
573/90 Moved by J. Coombes that authorization be given for Mr. Richard Tatro, Director of Public Works, to attend the "Training and Development of Public Works Employees" workshop on 90 11 05 and 90 11 06 in Vancouver, British Columbia.
CARRIED.
BY-LAW NO. By-Law No. 74-89: For the Purpose of Closing to Public 74-89 Travel, a portion of a Public Highway.
Mr. Eriksson indicated that approval has now been received from the Minister of Transportation and Utilities. 574/90 Moved by N. Norton that third reading of By- Law No. 74-89 be given.
CARRIED.
REVIEW FORUMS Review Forums - First Report of the Minister's Council ON LOCAL on Local Development DEVELOPMENT 575/90 Moved by W. Tweedle that the letter from Mr. Larry Austman, Director, Local Development Initiative, dated 90 10 04 regarding the Review Forums - First Report of the Minister's Council on Local Development be received for information.
CARRIED.
CORRESPONDENCE Correspondence/Items for Information 576/90 Moved by W. Tweedle that the following items be received for information:
(a) Memorandum from the A.A.M.D. & C. dated 90 10 03 regarding Livestock Siting and 4n3 Land-Use Planning.
(b) Summary of information provided from the Y.R.P.C., A.A.M.D. & C. and Agricultural C^&jr Service Board of the Municipal District of Brazeau No. 77 regarding Livestock Siting and Land-Use Planning.
(c) Approved Record of Development Permits and Approved Development Permits for the Month of September, 1990.
(d) The ALARIE Report dated 90 09 14.
(e) News Highlights from the A.A.M.D. & C. dated 90 10 03.
(f) Memorandum from the A.A.M.D. & C. dated ^$1 90 10 03 regarding Traffic Line Painting on Highways.
CARRIED.
...19
** -q_
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING - 9 - 90 10 11
•p>
PUBLIC WORKS Public Works Update UPDATE Mr. Tatro provided an update on the Public Works 4fD Department activities. i 577/90 Moved by W. Tweedle that Mr. Tatro's report on the Public Works Department be received for information.
CARRIED.
AIRPORT Airport Terminal Building Opening TERMINAL BUILDING Mr. Eriksson indicated that an invitation has been OPENING received for those who wish to attend the opening of the Airport Terminal Building. The opening will be held at 2:00 p.m. this afternoon.
M.D. OF ROCKY M.D. of Rocky Rapids Safe RAPIDS SAFE Mr. Eriksson indicated that the old safe which belonged to the M.D. of Rocky Rapids is presently owned by the Village of Seba Beach. He also indicated that this safe is part of the M.D.'s history and asked if we should acquire the safe. The M.D. of Rocky Rapids was dissolved in 1937. 578/90 Moved by N. Norton that authorization be given for administration to negotiate with the summer village of Seba Beach for the purchase of the old M.D. of Rocky Rapids safe.
CARRIED.
ORGANIZATIONAL Organizational Meeting MEETING Mr. Coombes provided the other Councillors with information acquired from the County of Leduc, County of Parkland and County of Wetaskiwin regarding Councillor per diem rates for consideration at the annual Organizational Meeting.
Discussion was held regarding the issue of Councillor's per diem.
579/90 Moved by J. Coombes that the information provided regarding Councillor per diem rates be received for information.
CARRIED.
ADJOURNMENT 580/90 Moved by W. Tweedle that the Regular Council Meeting of 90 10 11 adjourn at 11:40 a.m.
CARRIED.
REEVE
MUNICIPAL SECRETARY
-Hi PUBLIC HEARING
90 10 03 7:30 P.M. PEMBINA OIL SEPARATORS PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL LANDFILL SITE NE 29-48-7 W5H
PRESENT
H. Rondeau, Reeve B. Booth, Deputy Reeve N. Norton, Councillor W. Tweedle, Councillor J. Coombes, Councillor J. Eriksson, Municipal Manager D. Roberge, Planning and Development Officer J. Andrew, Recording Secretary
ALSO IN ATTENDANCE WERE;
Shaun Polczer, Western Review Bud Byram, Pembina Oil Separators Bob Barker, Pembina Oil Separators Ken Byram, Pembina Oil Separators Brad Wilson, Pembina oil Separators Pam and Len Regenwetter Rob Macintosh <-] Brad Wilson J Jim and Rita Davis Bob Landers Mr. and Mrs. Cecil Andersen Kelly stone Mr. and Mrs. Jim Beckett Jerry and Audrey Grieb W. Durham Reg and Lil Ross Bob Gillis Cliff Whitelock Gerry and Lori Landers Ken Landers Jim Reid, E.R.C.B.
Mr. Rondeau declared the Public Hearing open at 7:32 p.m. Mr. Rondeau indicated that an application has been made by Pembina Oil Separators to request rezoning of NE 29-48-7 W5M from Agricultural Mixed Land Use to Industrial/Commercial Land Use. «* Mr. Rondeau then called upon Mr. Dave Roberge, Planning and Development officer, to provide his comments.
f^3 -I) — r - 2 -
Mr. Roberge indicated that on 90 09 13 the Municipal Planning Commission received an application provided by Pembina oil Separators for the development of a landfill site. Section 29 of the County of Parkland Land Use By-Law does not allow the Municipal Planning Commission to issue a permit under that section. By-Law 114-90 is to amend the County of Parkland Land-Use By-Law adopted by the Municipal District of Brazeau No. 77 by reclassifying the Land Use designation of the NE 1/4 Section 29-48-7 W5M from Agricultural Mixed Land Use to Industrial/Commercial Land Use. The proposed use of the land is a Class II Industrial Landfill site.
Mr. Rondeau called upon the gentlemen present from Pembina oil Separators to provide their comments.
Mr. Ken Byram outlined what Pembina Oil Separators was all about, how they evolved, how they handle the product at present and how they intend on handling the product in the future. Mr. Byram indicated that they purchased Pembina Oil Separators in 1979 and r indicated that Pembina Oil separators is the largest effective recycler in the Drayton Valley area. /Mr. Byram indicated that Pembina Oil Separators does not accept product from gas plants and that they do not accept Hazardous Waste.
Mr. Byram went on to explain upgrading which has been done in the past few years and indicated that they are very concerned with the Environment. Pembina Oil Separators needs the landfill to accommodate the land farm and to accommodate changes in the system. Mr. Byram indicated that their proposal is to have a small landfill to assist in land farming and are applying for a Class 2 Industrial landfill, we will not be changing the product that we accept and will be accepting no new product. One hectare or 2.5 acres is needed. The proposed cells are 1/6 of the size and only one of these cells will be open at one time, we will continue to use the land farm. r Mr. Byram indicated that the area has 1/2 to 1 metre of top soil and then 8 to 9 metres of clay. The cells will be dug 4 to 5 metres into the clay. The solids being put in the landfill will be at a proposed 2 to 1 ratio being 2 parts solids to 1 part clay. In conclusion Mr. Byram indicated that Pembina Oil Separators are the leaders in Alberta in processing this product and that they will continue to improve. They feel it is secure because of research, design and monitoring. They also feel that the neighbours concerns have been addressed regarding groundwater -la
- 3 - contamination and are looking at putting a test well in the upper \ area of the bedrock and propose to take water samples from this well as well as from the existing well at the plant facility and * test the quality of the water on a regular basis. Mr. Byram indicated that the original application for the size of the parcel of land was for 160 acres and that they wished to amend H the application for rezoning to be 80 acres. This 80 acres would I be the east 1/2 of the NE quarter. Mr. Rondeau then called for persons to speak for the application. J
No comments were received. Mr. Rondeau then called for persons to speak against the ' application.
Mr. Jim Davis indicated that one of his concerns is the contamination of groundwater. He indicated that building a landfill is an easy way to dispose of an undesirable waste and that ^ by the capsules being buried no one can see whats happening -its easy to hide. ]
Mr. Byram responded that the product is in current use in the area "1 surrounding our community. If there is no where to take the » product it gets put in ditches, on roads and in the back 40 so to speak. He indicated that these are real concerns and that they H feel they are the leaders in the way the product is handled. Mr. | Byram went on to explain that there are many watchful organizations, i.e. Alberta Environment, the Clean Water Act, etc. «* Clay is an excellent liner. They don't feel the product will get ] out of the landfill itself and are planning on putting a test well on top of the bedrock and testing the water. Mr. Robert Landers questioned the remaining 80 acres being put into an Industrial area in the future. Mr. Rondeau indicated that a permit would have to be acquired. Mr. Byram indicated that they are wishing to use only the east half of this 80 acre parcel.
Mr. Landers indicated that he has heard those stories before. C7?^ Mrs. Audrey Grieb indicated that she did not understand why this [ has to be put in the middle of agricultural land being only 1.5 miles from Town. The smell is very bad. Something like this «_ should be out in the bush where there are no animals or people. There have been oil spills. She mentioned that the E.R.C.B. has told her that there are heavy metals and dangerously high levels of sour gas coming off that site. There is no guarantee that these H r -)3-
- 4 -
pollutants will be stopped from getting into the Saskatchewan River from the two coulees that run through this area. This is an agricultural community, it should be put somewhere else. Mr. Grieb indicated that he is a landowner in the NE 1/4. I don't agree regarding safety of the clay alone. The area cannot 'P consistently be kept dry. I feel that according to Mr. Byram* s report that 20 acres would be big enough for the next 100 years. The problem of odour has not been addressed. Mr. Grief mentioned that he raises race horses and has on record seven abortions. Federal vets have been in. These abortions usually occur two to four days after a strong smell in the area. On tests completed on the fetuses sulphur has been present. When a foul is lost half my income is lost. This location is 300 to 400 yards of us. He feels more research should be done. Mrs. Grieb indicated that regarding the abortions, they have had a horse that lost a baby at eight months and one at nine months. i She had three healthy babies before that. The next time she was bred she was taken to the Berrymoor area and brought home two weeks before delivery and she had a healthy baby. I can't prove it but I believe there has to be some possible connection with people and animals.
Mr. Byram said that they do not accept sour gas product into the plant.
Mr. Gerry Landers indicated that he drives for Norette and that he hauled sour fluid into the plant two months ago.
Mr. Byram indicated to Mr. Landers that he broke the law. r Mr. Gerry Landers indicated that they were called and Norette was told they could bring the product. Mr. Grieb indicated that we are not here to argue whether he took in the product or not, but indicated that the suffering has r started. Mr. Jim Reid from the E.R.C.B. indicated that air quality testing was conducted and to his recollection no dangers of sour gas was found. We advised Pembina Oil Separators that they should not take tanks with sour gas.
Mrs. Grieb questioned the validity of this and indicated that she was given a monitor. A monitoring van was out and she had been told that high levels of gas has existed. Pembina Oil Separators new when the van was out. Mr. Davis asked who took the water samples.
'if> -»«4-
fm$l
- 5 -
Mr. Ken Bryam responded that they take the samples and send them to an independent lab. Mr. Whitelock indicated that he was basically opposed to any type of landfill. A complete analysis should be done on every load that is accepted by Pembina Oil Separators. My main concern is the contamination of groundwater. If Pembina Oil Separators is given a Class 2 and something happens who will pay. Will Pembina oil separators pay and if they don't will the M.D. be responsible and pay with tax payer money? I feel that sludge should be disposed of at the Swan Hills plant.
Mr. Ross indicated that the chemicals do not go into the soil. They go out with the water or stay with the oil. Mr. Whitelock indicated that they had brought in sour tanks at one time, but they have now cleaned it up.
Mr. Booth indicated that he understood the open pit has been sealed and is no longer in use. Since this has been done has their been any significant change in the odour? 1 Mrs. Grieb indicated that they have not noticed any significant difference. I've been told that hypothetically these chemicals are going into the animals and we1 re eating these animals. Mr. Jim Reid indicated that the persons employed in Drayton Valley are not experts on heavy metals, etc. 1 Mr. Booth asked Mr. Reid if the E.R.C.B would consider the proposed n new operation be better in terms of all Environmental concerns and J some concerns expressed here tonight. Mr. Reid replied yes. The E.R.C.B. has seen a lot of improvement H in the last 14 years. We have been pressing them for 4 or 5 years to get rid of the pits. They have made a conscientious effort to clean up. «**
Mr. Macintosh spoke on the importance of waste characterization. Mr. Macintosh indicated that it is critical to have a lot of « confidence that this waste does not include sufficient levels of I Hazardous Waste. With regards to the sampling and monitoring system, you have to look at how often it is being sampled. The most environmentally safe method must be chosen - either landfill *! or land farming. 1
Mr. Byram indicated that they believe that waste characterization ^ is a key element. What we have done in the past and what we are | trying to do is to try to monitor the product coming into our plant. Product is only taken from reliable operators. We have to m know where it is coming from and what is coming in each load. 5 —
- 6 -
Mr. Byram then explained land farming versus landfill. Land farming works well, but only when the weather is warm.
Mr. Whitelock asked what would cause the water to have that bad odour?
Mr. Byram answered that produced water has a bad odour.
Mr. Bud Byram indicated that the Oilfield Association has done a lot of work regarding waste characterization. A report will be available sometime in the future.
Mr. Barker indicated that the doer is always chastised. Natural soil has heavy metals. Mr. Jim Beckett indicated that he has lived on the 1/4 across from the site since 1945. I remember when that stuff wasn't here. Mrs. Grieb asked why should we have it dumped in our back yard? Why should we suffer for their livelihood? Mr. Jim Davis stated that if it were to go through, the area should be kept as small as possible - no larger than 40 acres. Rob Macintosh indicated there must be a greater level of confidence.
Mr. Booth asked when the open house occurred for the viewing of the facility how many persons here tonight attended.
Show of hands - majority. Mr. Grieb indicated that it is great to see onsite improvements. This is not the issue today. We still have spills. One mistake and my well is gone forever.
Mr. Rondeau indicated that due to the comments and questions raised this evening that he would like to have another public hearing.
Mr. Eriksson indicated that the M.D. would like to see more data from Alberta Environment and the Alberta West Central Health Unit. Perhaps Pembina Oil Separators can supply further information. Mr. Coombes asked how much product goes in each day?
Mr. Byram indicated that 4,000 cubic metres of solids are taken each year which would be approximately 1 gravel truck load per day. You must take into consideration that some of the amount will be decreased by our drying process. -lb-
- 7 -
Mr. Booth referred to a letter from Alberta Environment with regards to this proposed landfill and asked Mr. Macintosh if this was the information he referred to. 1 Mr. Macintosh indicated that yes it was. Mr. Booth asked if the information requested would be made "1 available from Pembina Oil Separators. I Mr. Byram indicated there is a problem with the upgradient water •*} sample. These deficiencies still exist in our application. From j where we sit, Alberta Environment is the primary agency. Mr. Roberge indicated that he is hoping that Alberta Environment *1 will supply something to us soon. * Mr. Byram indicated that they did not receive this letter from T Alberta Environment until August. j Mr. Macintosh indicated that the key thing is that the actual <~) sludge characterization is complete. I
Mr. Byram indicated that this information has been sent in for analysis. "1 Mr. Beckett asked what Pembina Oil Separators is presently doing with the sludge. i Mr. Byram indicated that it has been land farmed and now will have
to be stockpiled. f^i Mr. Rondeau indicated that a future public hearing will be held. He thanked all those for attending and for providing input in relation to the landfill.
Mr. Rondeau called the public hearing closed at 9:00 p.m.
f^\ — I~7-
DEVELOPMENT OFFICERS REPORT TO COUNCIL
REPORT NO. 82-90
SUBJECT: Proposed Subdivision 90/91YH012-41 NE 24-48-8 W5M r DAVIS, Evan & Linda
RECOMMENDATION: Decision be tabled until such time as the applicants prepare an Area Structure Plan for the NE 24-48-8 W5M.
REPORT: Mr. and Mrs. Davis are proposing the development of (8) eight Country Residential parcels, ranging in area of 21.28 acres to 12.8 acres. Staff of the M.D. of Brazeau believe that an Area Structure Plan is warranted in this case to address concerns such as future resubdivision, ultimate density, access and internal road systems, servicing, municipal and school reserves, storm water management, etc. -18— 'RETURN COMPLETED APPLICATION FORMS TO: YELLOWHEAD REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION ' Box 249, Onovyay, Alberta -• r» TOE 1VO Phi 967-2249 " 5U ^-mi ]-fob .No,. |DV90084
SCHEDULE I FORM A MS 29,1990 I APPLICATION FORfcSaWL^ A SUBDIVISION APPROVAL^^^mtmmii FILE No. EJ By plan of subdivision Form A as completed U Byothor instrument A9itfrtn/a-V/ Tick whichever applies Fees Submitted: ^ts^^0r^^s^^t^^r^^^j^^^^o'^^^stM^of 1.Name ofregistered owner of land to be.eubd.ivtded Addreaa and phone no. *y.™£..h&*±.R*yl* Box 7319-Drayton »«•<«• *» ««• cp^'t.' FhT54'2'-2Zf5S— Valley,Alberta. 2. Authorized personacting on behalfof registered owner 1 J? Keith Smith, A..L.S u*?lreriittf08?Associates Ltd., Bftx...692.9.*Dray.tQn...yAnJey.fc Nwim m block uptuta 542-5252 3. LEGAL DESCRIPTION ANDAREAOF LAND TO BE SUBDIVIDED XXWpert of the N.*E* «/4 see ZM. twp MS. range 8. Being Xttpart. of ISX. «{*** X^KKVKX. westofC.O.T.No...8020635125th. mendia-- Area of the above parcel of land to be subdivided .?.....'..(.....„?..! 12?.94 a - 4. LOCATION OF LAND TO BE SUBDIVIDED a. The land issituated in the municipality of ....^P^...?.?....?,?®?.?.^...!?0.'.?.?. b. Is the land situtated immediately adjacent tothe municipal boundary? Yes .„.? * No If "yes", the adjoining municipality is c. Isthe land situated within O.S miles of theright-of-way ofa Highway/ Yes ... ..*. No If "yes", the Highway is No ,h8 Secondary Road is No ...&2Q d. Is the land situated within O.S miles ofariver, stream, watercourse, lake or other permanent body ofwater, or acanal or drainage ditch? Yes ....x. No II "yes", stateits name &9.1i...nained S. EXISTING AND PROPOSED USE OF LANDTO BE SUB0IVI0ED 1 Describe: «... a. e«»imguseofiheland.°?^ pasture b. Proposed use ol the land (P1 easi coap1etareverse)V"?^*^Z® *£f!!®'^E^?K^?tf^'^l c. The designated use ofthe land asclassified under aland use bylaw or azoning bylaw or aland use classification guide where applicable 6. PHYSICALCHARACTERISTICS OF LAND TO BE SUBDIVIDED 1 nn£ ^J +v.aiUf i «J£?w?8°«a"2n1an«' water on the land (brush. snruba.lree stands, woodlots. etc. •sloughs, creeks, etc.) 90% of the land is still tree covered.No bodies of water, or streams.ri'rive etc*--exist-on the-landw ma^-^xir-r^-^ "...,...., xt.•' c. Describe the H.nd of soil on the land (sandy, loam. clay. etc.)..JE^iJ!?11 ." clay oveI*ain With a . narrow width of humus. 7. EXISTING BUILDINGS ON THE LAND PROPOSED TO BE SUBDIVIDED Describe anybuildings, historical orotherwise, andanystructureson the landand whether they are to be demolished ormoved Tne^ownejrs^^^res exist on the site and are to remain. 8. REGISTERED OWNEH OR PERSON ACTING ON HIS BEHALF I. J^*...?.!5i*!)l.».A.,.L..,..§.f. heruby certify that I '.full CMIIMt Ul bkX* LapiMlkl XdfXH63SKiX3uX&UG2GJbX0C am authorized to act onhehall oi the registered~ownerand lhal lha m'orma'«>n U«ven on this lorm islull andjjompleie and is. to the best ol ioy kitowlttdue. a true statement ol the facts relatingto his application lor subdivison approval u/o J.K. Smith & Associates Ltd., Address Mx... 6.9.29.,....J0raytorL.yall.ey... ,s,aned, Phone No. 5.*!:?-5252 ^^ / ^gust 10, ^90. FURTHER INFORMATION MAY lit PROVIDED BY APPLICANT ON THE REVERSE OF THIS FORM -11— :rip«i $<•• •:-u c{/s?isr£c *>- «;•)»• • tin 9-/(1 ?«s*ii 5R1 *)*««? a-resct-i* .••» Wf ijr" tse tic.:: •-.:. ••-* uiaj • •iwi.i'.....-..:•::.. .: •jfcrsj?? 5r. n? ftCVCXaC 'sis foa* m*.s e*-«t '«<*«»•»*' ••"l,.i*.;«.'»«i»n jL •,'••-'- :^i< i ••• jif.fi **;.:«flf r r««xaaBBS'**i • ri(ivds,w «' ***.Ai/ * •"••U.':" I TQ.'-f^. s . xL APPROVAL fef* iX»L -...._«. TWS -<.*,.,.. ••'"'Jri. ... r-c-ij . : ./ctv.'s .S..H - • : c-* »•»•-'.vr:-iiarti«Bf•*ii+.£.'Aii«->:i-taww«wi«.i»-.s «rf>^avMr^a:^'^ «.- .*.- «-.-.w.^^....- -.. f^^ -cPO- ,'W»—' --' -ft' r- .. I, •• - • j-. <«;j^.-•«•• PLAN»;^ SHOWING"*"• •^iv^.;«*.«•. PROPOSED SUBDIVISION u; i ] fj OF PART OF THE' Mil NiEi1/4 SEC.24 - TP.4S.;- R; IDBMi OHNUt suhim PLAN 218.22 .4 ?• TTJi S!35lf i —Laa ids. ill 1t*A*** lb 142,04 Existing residence. JUL ./ 41 IB H i!I. W«IIsll«.•'•••16-24 ; 4.69 ha 6.67 ha °8.61 ha i (12.08 Ac) (16.48 Ac) (21.28 Ac) / r 2UJ04 22080 2A4J1 32S.U 403.29 Q4 { ^__ Test holes o3 F B 5.65 ha 6.96 ha (13.96 Ac) (17.25 Ac) 40X25 E J29.53 5.65 ha (13.96 Ac) fT^X 40121 147.22 •T WlL 81.H 7.40 ha SU8DN PLAN (16.28 Ac) 5.93 ha 310 K.S. * 5 (14.65 "Ac) o C.of T. 234.10 2S5.W ftfc AW ir a a d PLAN 73B* 107* REVISED JULY lltb, 1990 ttttf i i : 5000 JOB NO t brash or t N.S. J.K.SMITH * -ASSOCIATES LTD. DRAYTON VALLEY •*•- ALBERTA 0VB00S4 OXS i AUGUST 9, 1990. "pi W^'.".«"J.,!wi!J«rrtV.r<«....^vJ..j»<-.lil« «<(»» ».-Vn ;«^«.t*.>.lT.l.;»1^jtTl.t.i.-,.-,T^ • REPORT ON WATER .ABLE AND PERCOLATION TESTS - CONT'D. ~c*a -— July 30,1990. Test set No.l; ... .-« Water table test hole 8*6" to water j percolation test hole Added water to 12" from top - at 16:06 m Water 12£" from top at I61I6 1 Test set No.2j ** Water table test hole abandoned - bush - water6' from top 5 Percolation test hole - 18i" to water at 15136 Added water to 10H from top - at 151^7 Water 10i" from top at 15»57. July 31st.1990. Test set No,3? New water table test hole drilled outside of bush area in pasture. Except for top 2",!hole was drilled in 10* of clay. Drilling finished at 13:00 hrs. No water in hole. Water was at 7'6" at I3130. ^ Test set No.li Water table testhole - 7'6n to water Percolation test hole - water at 14" Test set No.2; • Percolation test hole - water at 14". Notej Water table tests and percolation tests were done ^ by J.K. Smith,A.L.S.. 1 i «»> l~ f4A fi* A^ 31 - I ft REPORT ON WATER ^ABLE AND PERCOLATION TEST? WITHIN _ n - / N.E. i - SEC. 2s - TP. 48 - RG.8 - W.5th MEDIAN. ^ ^ June 20.1990. Test Set No.l. - Drilling began at 13:20 hrs. Drill log for water table test. 0 - 4" - dark brown loam 4" - 10" - grey clay 10" - y - sandy clay y - 5' - ' " with small stones. 5! "?',"" " lient brown, slightly moist 8* - 10*- •" '• h Drilling ended 13*43 hrs.- no water in hole. Trace water in hole at 10! - 14:03 hrs. 'PI Percolation test? Drill log same as above for 36". Sides of hole- scored for access to undist. urbed soil. Water in to 18" from top at 13:53 Water down £" in first minute Water down 3/4* at 14:03 hrs. IP <• Test set No.2 - Drilling began;,at 15:20 hrs. Holes were drilled in bush on old trail. Suspect somesurface drainage from ditch on E/W road allowance. Drill log for water table test. 0 - 8" - brown loam 8"- 2* - brown granular clay-fairly dry. 2*- 5' - grey brown clay- some small stones 5': 19*- " " _" - slightly moister. Drilling ended 15*30 - no water in hole Percolation test* Drill log same as above for 36". Sides of hole scored for access to undisturbed soil. Water in to 18" from top of hole. No discernable loss at 15:30. June 21.1990. Test set No.l. Water table test hole 8'6" to water - 08i40hrs. Percolation test hole Water 20" from top of hole 08;50 hrs. Test set No.2 Water table test hole - full Percolatian test hole - l?iM to water 08:45 r Tests on June 21, were taken after an unusually heavy overnite rain. Due to continuous rain fall, further tests were not done until July 30,1990. r r -1—* •-:..m-r.-:~~ ..... Jf"~— ._ _• «-— * * -* ~" **• + —X 151. R9 -<34 — DEVELOPMENT OFFICERS REPORT TO COUNCIL REPORT NO. 91-90 SUBJECT: Proposed Subdivision 90/91 YH090-41 Pt. NE 21-49-5 W5M Lagoon Site, Lindale School RECOMMENDATION: Approval be granted subject to the following conditions: p!^. 1. Applicant obtain a waiver from the operation of Section 12(2) of the Subdivision Regulations. 2. Parcel to be created be consolidated with parcel to the north, Certificate of Title 902 097 119. REPORT: Twin Rivers wishes to subdivide out approximately 0.8 Ha (2.0 acres) from Pt. of the NE 1/4 Section 21-49-5 W5M and consolidate the parcel being created with the existing parcel to the north (school site Certificate of Title 902 097 119) . The parcel being created is to accommodate a recently developed sewage lagoon. Section 12(2) of the Subdivision Regulations states that no subdivision for the purposes of a sewage lagoon shall be approved unless the lagoon is situated a minimum of 1000 feet from any residential development. The lagoon as constructed is in contravention of the criteria and would necessitate a waiver of Section 12(2) of the Subdivision Regulations to be granted by the Alberta Planning Board prior to being granted subdivision approval from the subdivision t?i$\ approving authority. Through investigation, the Development Officer has concluded that permitting of the lagoon was through Alberta Plumbing and Gas in consultation with Alberta Environment for actual lagoon design criteria. Gr?\ -as— REPORT NO. 91-90 (Continued) Alberta Labour issued the permit under the plumbing code which stipulates less stringent setback regulations for private systems. The Development Officer believes that permits should have been obtained from Alberta Environment for a public sewage lagoon because at the present time, the lagoon is not situated on private land ie: school property. If Twin Rivers is successful in gaining subdivision approval, the permits in place shall be legitimized. r ipi -£3fc>— RETURN. COMPLETEL APPLICATION FORMS »J: YELLOWHEAD REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION Box 249, Onoway, Alberta TOE 1VO Ph. 967-2249 . SCHEDULE 1 FORM A APPLICATION FOR FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY SUBDIVISION APPROVAL DATE ol receipt of FILE No. Form A as completed La Byplanof subdivision * l_J Byother instrument ykV)<4H Q90-1// Tick whichevor applies Fees Submitted: V THIS FORM IS TO BE COMPLETED IN FULL WHEREVER APPLICABLE BY THE REGISTERED OWNER OFTHE LAND THE SUBJECT OF THE APPLICATION OR BY AN AUTHORIZED PERSON ACTING ON HIS BEHALF. 1. Name of registered owner of land to be subdivided Address and phone no. „S^.3#IST_0NmBACK l Nam. in block capital* 2. Authorized person acting on behalf of registered owner Address end phone no. ...HUGO..MGLER.JW.S,..BA^OW..S .BQX....3..2.P.9....SpK}Aff.e....G^.Qy.e...T7X...3A5.... Nam. In block capital* 3. LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND AREA OF LAND TO BE SUBDIVIDED jf^J/pan ofthe ..;...??..•..?..•. V* sec. ...2.1 twp. ..4.9. range 5. west of..5. meridian 1 Being all/pans of lot block Reg. Plan No COT. No Area of the above parcel of land to be subdivided ...Nj3W...pa.r.C.el...3..,.Q.6...ha acres 4. LOCATION OF LAND TO BE SUBDIVIDED Brazeau a. The land is situated in the municipality of b. Is the land situtated immediately adjacent to the municipal boundary? Yes No ..No. II "yes", the adjoining municipality is c. Is the land situated within O.S miles ol the right-ol-way of a Highway? Yes No No If "yes", the Highway is No.' the Secondary Road is No d. Is the land situated withinO.S milesof a river, stream, watercourse, lake or other permanentbodyof water, or a canal or drainage f»» ditch? Yes No...N.9. If "yes", state its name 5. EXISTING AND PROPOSEO USE OF LAND TO BE SUBDIVIDED Describe: a. Existing use of the land School...and..existing.lagoon b. Proposed use of the land (Please cooplete reverse) same .•...„ c. The designated use ol the land as classified under a land use bylaw or a zoning bylaw or a land use classification guide where applicable '. 1 6. PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF LAND TO BE SUBDIVIDED PH a. Describethe nature of the topographyof the land(flat, rolling, steep, mixed) .flat b. Describe the nature of the vegetation and water on the land (brush, shrubs, tree stands, woodlots, etc. • sloughs, creeks, etc.) f^^\ ••••none c. Describe the kind of soilon the land(sandy, loam,clay, etc.) ....clay 7. EXISTING BUILDINGS ON THE LAND PROPOSED TO BE SUBDIVIDED fiSfc Describe any buildings, historical or otherwise, and any structures on the land and whether they are to be demolished or moved School buildingto...stayasis 8. REGISTERED OWNER OR PERSON ACTING ON HIS BEHALF I, .HUGO...ENGLER..of...W,.S,...BARLOW«.SURVEXING-LTD-. hereby certify that I (Full nam* in block capnaltl ,and that the information given on this form is lull and corrtploloand is, to the am authorized to act on behall ol the registered owner' best ol my knowledge, a true statement of the lacts relating to his application for subdivison approval. tW\ Box 3209 Spruve Grove T7X 3A5 ,c. .. Address 5. (Signed) Phone No ?62..9642, Date :&*.{& 2JI Qlf?. FURTHER INFORMATION MAY BE PROVIDED BY APPLICANT ON THE REVERSE OF THIS FORM. SECTION: 5(b) TO BE COMPLETED BY THE AFPLICANT/LANDOWNER Please outline in detail the exact proposed use of the following: -a (1) The parcel to be created: .. .(see. iekow). (2) The remainder of the title: (Note: The proposed uses aust be ones shown in the aunicipal Land Use By-law) DECISION: YOUR APPLICATION TO SUBDIVIDE THE LANDS DESCRIBED ON THE REVERSE OF THIS FORK HAS BEEN: D APPROVED WITHOUT. CONDITION: D APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (Note: All conditions of this approval oust be aet prior to coaaencenent of construction or endorseoent of final registcrable docunent). D REFUSED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. Name of registered owner of land to be subdivided C. of T. 832 114 035 FRANCIS LA CHANCE JOYCE LA CHANCE Lindale, Alberta Phone: 54 2 3322 C. of T. TWIN RIVERS SCHOOL DIVISION NO. 65 Box 7108, Drayton Valley,- Alberta, TOE 0M0 Phone : 542 4888 The object of the subdivision is to consolidate the area used for the lagoon with the school site (902 097 119) for administrative purposes. The lagoon has been constructed and is in use. YELLCWKEAD REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION YELLOWHEAD REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION CONDITIONAL APPROVAL REFUSED DATE FILE NO. r THIS ENDORSEMENT IS VALID FOR 12 MONTHS SUBSEQUENT TO THE ABOVE DATE. DATE FILE NO. DIRECTOR Y.R.P.C. DIRECTOR Y.n.P.C. \ -38- ^ROAD PLAN 782-1375 GOVERNMENT ROAD ALLOWANCE • 134.72 C.OF T. o 8 C.OF T. 902 097 119 ?, w (PROPOSED SCHOOL SITE) 8 «o BLK.5 AREA - 3.06 ha 1 BLK.2 r— 12.38 18.30 /^— 104.00 —^^ PLAN 832-1763 b (PROPOSED r- LAGOON FOR SCHOOL) N d d «o UI C.OF T. 832 114 035 \ BLK.3 3: 1 o -i 104.CO 9 o Of PA z LU TENTATIVE PLAN 2 Z SHOWING PROPOSED SUBDIVISION OF 85 > o C.OF T. 902 097 119 o AND PART OF C.OF T. 832 114 035 WITHIN THE N.E. 1 /4 SEC.21, TWP.49, RGE.5, W.5 M. f^ M.D. OF BRAZEAU No.77 / •** / "* BLK.4 1 i I c^ V PLAN 832-1763 / -« NOTE: f o Distances are expressed In metres and decimals thereof. / a- DATE' JlJLY 27.1990 B31 C Pltf&l&HrffViJfl SFRUCE GROVE. ALBERTA «&/oa?ofiJl/aiiAViVA^&J YELLOWCKFE, N.W.T. SCALE: 1 : 2000 DRAWN: C.L.R. SURVEYING LTD. FHOFEi W2-B042 FILE* 901-254 ^^5 r -a^— COUNTY OF PARKLAND NO. 31 w KEY PLAN SCALE: I « 100,000 FILE' 901-254 -30- DEVELOPMENT OFFICERS REPORT TO COUNCIL REPORT NO. 92-90 SUBJECT: Proposed Wellsite and Access Road LSD 16 Section 6-50-10 W5M (Cynthia) POCO PETROLEUMS LTD. ^3 RECOMMENDATION: That Municipal District of Brazeau No. 77 has no objection to the proposed wellsite and access road LSD 16 Section 6-50-10 W5M (Cynthia). REPORT: In accordance with provincial legislation, we have received a proposal for a wellsite and access road to be developed within 1.5 km of PsTS an inhabited area ie: Hamlet of Cynthia. The proposed well is categorized as an oil target well, total depth of 2023 metres and not sour. The Development Officer has no objection to the proposed well. l ,"A -3 • #200. 358-58th Avenue S.W.. Calgary. Alberta T2H2M5 VERICK Phone: (403) 258-1102 - Telecopier 252-1811 #3. 9504-87 Street. Edmonton. Alberta T6C3J1 Phone: (403) 468-3084 - Telecopier 468-2812 'AND #2333 Mclntyre Street, Reglna, Saskatchewan S4P 2S3 Phone:(306)757-8511 — Telecopier: 359-0277 ONSULTANTS P.B. (Barry) ROWE P.J. (Pat) TERNES President & General Managor Land Manager (Edmonton) (87) INC. KEN HART Land Manager (Regina) September 26, 1990 File: SE 4399 Municipal District of Brazeau No. 77 P.O. Box 77 i Drayton Valley, Alberta TOE Attention: Terry Fleming Dear Sir: Re: POCO PETROLEUMS LTD. Wellsite and Access Road 16-6-50-10-W5M We enclose in triplicate (3) Survey Plan in connection with the above. On behalf of our client, Poco Petroleums Ltd., We herein request your " conditions/approval as to the subject location being within 1.5 kms of the Town of Cynthia, Alberta. Kindly prepare the Agreement in our client's name, rather than in Maverick's name or in care of Maverick. Please forward the Agreement to the writers' attention at your earliest convenience. We trust the above is in order and should you have any questions, please contact the writer at your convenience. • Yours very truly, J\ND CONSULTANTS (87) INC. "FaTTTik &. Ternes Land Manager, Edmonton PJT/mfs Encl. cc: Mike MacDonald - Poco Petroleums Ltd, Incorporated in the Province of Alberta and registered to carry on business in the Provinces of Saskatchewan, Manitoba and British Columbia na J L JUL. ic -33i- ®T Ast'd. 90* 02' Trontolto "^ \ Pino,Poplar \$» i47»30'25" \ '° l6cmdto( ** 22»&.860//'\ L.S. 15 L.S. 10 C^IN CYNTK I IS km ToW/C ROUTE MAP NOT TO SCALE // POCO etal PEMBINA 16-6-50-10 Well Site And Access Road L.S. 16 , Sec. 6 f Twp. 50fRge. IOfW.5M. ELEVATIONS CO-ORDS. i , Andrew K. Lee , Alberta Land Surveyor .Hereby Certify That The Survey Represented By This Plan Is True And Centre . 919 02 350.33 of N Bdy ec 6 Correct To The Best Of My Knowledge And Was Completed NE Cor 918 62 Is 350.20 of E Bdy fflj S. E Cor 919 00 On The 18 th Day Of September, 1990. S.W Cor 919 42 NW Cor 919. 30 <;?/ p oh ° A| s7c>TA~LA*0 SUBVITOO AREAS ISBf Well Site I .440 3.56 &|AMAR SURVEYS LTDjdi o Access Road 0.357 0.86 •'AMAR SURVEYS LTD. Totol I .797 4.44 Licencing information nvml LEGEND scoie : i 5000 1 The Proposed Well Is AHt'. I 5dm From The Town Iron Spike Placed Shown Thus a Of CYNTHIA. Survey Monument Found Shown Thus ___ • 2 The Proposed Well Is At Least 100 m. From The Normal Distances And Elevations Are In Metres And Decimals. High Water Mark Of Any Significant Water Bodies No Surloce Improvements Within 200 Metres Unless Shown Otherwise 3 The Proposed Well Is At Least 100m From Any Surface Portions Referred To Shown Thus -^^^___^_^^_ r*^i Improvements And At Least 40 m. From Any Surveyed Rood. 4 The Proposed Well Is At Least 5.0km.From A Licenced OPERATOR : Airport Listed in Port A Of Schedule 3 .Oil S Gas Con Regs. 5. The Proposed Well Is At Least 1.6 km. From A Licenced POCO PETROLEUMS LTD. Airport LisKd In Part B Of Schedule 3,Oil 8 Gas Con.Regs. Owner C.olT. No. CROWN NIL 1 REVISIONS Surveyed By J. J. Drown By • R . O.P. Checked By M W File No ' 9009 POC 02 -33- M DEVELOPMENT OFFICERS REPORT TO COUNCIL REPORT NO. 93-90 SUBJECT: Renewal of Surface Materials Lease SML 800063 LSD 1 of SE 14-47-11 W5M TALL PINE TIMBER CO. LTD. RECOMMENDATION: The Municipal District of Brazeau No. 77 has no objection to the renewal of Surface Material Lease SML 800063, LSD 1 of SE 14-47-11 W5M, Tall Pine Timber Co. Ltd. REPORT: Tall Pine Timber Co. Ltd. has made application to Public Lands for the renewal of SML 800063. Tall Pine has held this lease for several years for the purpose of having access to gravel for their mill access road and yard. Tall Pine does not sell the material, it is strictly for their own use. Pi PI P f«S| -34 ,e- /A u LS UB (Rev 2 89) ^iborra T> REFERRAL MEMORANDUM 427-3570 FORESTRY. LANDS AND WILDLIFE Public Lands Division, Industrial and Commercial Land Section 3rd Floor. Petroleum Plaza. South Tower. 9915-108 Street. Edmonton, Alberta T5K 2C9 OUR FILE REFERENCES/^ A. &6>t?4&'$ YOUR FILE REFERENCE DATE Ji/iJ-zy/fo TO ALBERTA FOREST SERVICE ! FISH AND WILDLIFE DIVISION Forest Land Use Branch 6th Floor, Bramalea Building . ! ATTENTION: ATTENTION: TV An^StsA^ri 1 * FOREST: I^V9r/t^ /rjPpJ0i>UvJAZ&Cc ^Clearance required onreservation ! [^Clearance required onreservation /M£&22%&&asP> [^Also/Onlyclearance required forTPA •/WWse on rate of timberdamage new or reuse. QFor Applications in the Green Zone submit joint conditions throughAFS. •Jo/nf AFS and Fishand Wildlife conditions required. LAND MANAGEMENT BRANCH £30n Renewals/Amendments will original . V ATTENTION: conditions apply? j l riClearance required on reservation ALBERTA ENVIRONMENT PUBLIC LANDS DIVISION, FIELD SERVICES Water Resources Regional Administrator ATTENTION: [^Clearance required on reservation ALBERTA TRANSPORTATION AND UTILITIES 4th Floor, Twin Atria Building Please advise if water permit is required. 4999 - 98th Avenue Edmonton, Alberta, T6B 2X3 ALBERTA ENVIRONMENT ATTENTION: Environment Land Services 9820 • 106 Street rjC/earance required on reservation l^w) Edmonton, Alberta ATTENTION: Hwv ATTENTION: ALBERTA TRANSPORTATION AND UTILITIES l~l Clearance reauired on reservation District No. MUNICIPALITY - DEVELOPMENT OFFICER •Surveyed Road Allowance in I.D. ——^ m n 71 \ ("IPrimary or Secondary Road / \ / OTHER: • Surveyed Road Allowance/Secondary Road Please advise if a Development Permitis required, i SUBJECT: ^AMENDMENT-AMENDED OPERATING PLAN ^URFACE MATERIAL^ LICENC^^S^RESERVATION^LICATO^ri^*/^ ^ '-ftOrtJ^^ LAND DESCRIPTION: A.S f) /^ ^6- /?- Vl^T/S^^ Please review theattached application andoperating plan andprovide your comments andconditions. If you obiect to the disposition, please give reasons. Please illustrate on the operating plan all the butler zones that you may wish to impose. With theexception ofresponses from Alberta Forestry, should a response ornotice ofdelay notbe received within 30 days, this application willbe processed with the assumption thatyou have no concerns. p/WHIa111 attached conditions apply? nlELpffiniL0EfT| n*;r u 2 1S90 Industrial antf Commercial LanaSection LYC5" £J'CSlTXTCSuL Public Lands Division -36 — LS 24 (Ftov 3/S9) ydlborra SURFACE MATERIALS APPLICATION FORESTRY. LANDS AND WILDLIFE IEASE NUMBER Public Lands Division APPLICANT: Please Type or Print clearly In black Ink. SML fr0O<76 -? APPLICATION FOR: SM Lease Q SM Licence fj Renewal of SM Lease Q^ Manufacturing Clay Q Marl fj Sand Silica Sand SURFACE MATERIAL REQUIRED: Non-Manufacturing Clay • Peal L*J Sand & Gravel B- Topsod a TO BECOMPLETED INCONNECTION ProposedDateOf: Removalof: WITH UCENCE APPLICATION Commencement APftit 199/ Completion JiZ/y/. 19 7 / /ScS^0"-I**- applicants. ) POSTAL POSTAL CODE /-Q/. lAfl CODE ,-QA . /Af) Are youan employeeof the AlbertaGovernment or member ol the LegislativeAssemblyof the Province of Alberta? Yes Q Oept No 0" Are you a Canadian Citizen? Have you attained the age of 18 years? Attached: Sketch Occupant's Consent Yes f3 No n Yea g1 NoQ Linen or Polyester Plan B Attached fj Not Required fj LAND DESCRIPTION (Attach schedule If insufficient space) TWP. RGE. MER. i SECTION TWP. RGE. MER i SECTION <±Qt SIGNATURE OP APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE FOR DEPARTMENTAL USE ONLY Authorization is hereby granted to enteruponandimmediately occupy (hepublic landas described by thislorm and as shown on (he attached sketch subject to the followingconditions: FOR MINISTER OF FORESTRY. LANDS AND WILDLIFE APPUCATION ACCOUNTS USE ONLY SRPU: ConfUctjons: Surface File Records: Rental Yes D No D Account No.: Index: Operating Plan Approved Operating Royalty Guide: Date: Area* ac/ha Account No.: DISPOSITION Diary: Checked By: Date of Lease Term: Area: or Licence: years ac/ha Prepared By: REMARKS: Amount Receipt Numbers Total Security deposit required on. a - $ ApplicationFee: Present Balances: SML _ . debt/credit pi SMM. . dcbrttaedit Security Deposit- MGT credit Tor. Damages: New Charge. % interest after. Existing Remote Amount Rental/Royalty. Due $_ Total Consideration: Refund $ COPIES OF LOA AND DESCRIPTION FISH » WILDLIFE TRANSPORTATION RECOMMENDED FIELD SERVICES FOREST PROTECTION AREA MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY ENVIRONMENT IP fw$) -3b- LS 70 (Rev. 10/861 Ahala OPERATING PLAN FORESTRY. LANDS AND WILDLIFE Tobecompleted in Imperial or Metric whensubmitting anapplication for • Surface Materiel! Leata, Licence, or "D" Reservation. Public Lands Oivision 9915-108 Street Edmonton, Alberta T5K 2C9 FOR DEPARTMENTAL USE Name Surface Materials Lease No. g^ Address Surface Materials Licence No. "D" Reservation Number Postal Code rOL . i/t a Telephone Number ^ 1. Commencement Date of Operations: AP/lZt- 19i/Completion Date:—-T&m£ i 19JLL c^ 2. How much surface material will be removed during operations:. JZjSlQ. cubic yards. (. .cubic meters). 3. What size area will be utilized during this operation:. .acres (. hectares). Show dimensions of operations on operating plan on other side. ffiS 4. Location of Deposit: Riverbed Floodplain Highland. .Gravel Bar. .Island. .Spruce. .Brushland. .Other. 5. Forest Cover: Grassland ^ Poplar. .Pine. r^ Whererequiredoperator must salvage merchantabletimber; 6. Dominant Soil Type: Clay ^CL-inches. Loam inches. Silt. .inches. Sand. .inches. (Clay cm. Loam cm. Silt. cm. Sand. cm.) 7. Depth of overburden to be removed: 2 feet. (. .meters). 8. Thickness of Deposit: 2 feet. (. .meters) 9. Size of Material in Deposit: Estimate 0-1" % 1"'2"_ .% 2"-3". _% 3"+. 1%. (Centimetres: 0-2.5cm % 2.5-5cm.. .% 5-7.5cm. .% 7.5cm.+. _%). 10. Intended depth ofexcavation: £_feet. ( .meters). 11. Are access roads to be constructed: YES .NO. 12. If access roadscrossor affectany waterbodyplease state: Name of waterbody Width feet. (Width metres). Bank Height feet. (Bank Height. .metres). Pleaseattach a sketch showingaccessroads and location of waterbody. 13. Method of operation: Front End Loader. .Dragline. . Shovel. .Scraper. Other Explain:. 14. Type of operation: Pit run. . Screened . Washed. . Crushed. 15. If crushed and washed, will wafer be obtained from: Lake Stream .River. Other Rate at which water is removed . . Gallons per minute. . Litres per minute). 16. If material iswashed, describe method of retaining fine material and sediment, if settling ponds to be used, show locationon planon other sideor submitseparatelocation plan. 17. Describe how the operating area will bereclaimed: (include timing, equipment, seeding, etc., use additional pagesif necessary) — Agf.t.AntArztiu L'Jr, c ,?£ /do*/* rO fiitf&$rf?y ^°e(^rcAn^ An operator who intends to remove surface materials from the bed of any lake, river or stream, shall comply withTheWater Resources Act, and if applicable, TheClean Water Act. Alberta Environment must becontacted for complete information. fwR PLEASE COMPLETE OPERATING PLAN ON THE REVERSE SIDE am IPI ~37~ Schedule "A", SML800063, Twp: 47-11-W5M; Pt. Sec. 14, LSD 1. THIS AUTHORIZATION IS GRANTED PURSUANT TO THE HOLDER OF THIS DISPOSITION COMPLYING WITH ALL RELEVANT STATUTORY PROVISIONS AND ON CONDITION THAT THE OPERATOR SHALL: Contact and advise the District Ranger in Lodgepole, Alberta, (telephone 894-3642), of your intentions prior to any construction or entry on the land. 2. Take all precautions necessary to confine any deleterious material'on the lease area and to prevent same from entering any stream, watercourse or waterbody. 3. All merchantable coniferous timber must be salvaged pursuant to Section 148 of The p Timber Management Regulations unless otherwise authorized in writing by the Forest Superintendent. 4. Dispose of all combustible debris resulting from the operations by burning. 5. Dispose of all brush and debris in a manner as may be directed by a Forest Officer i in accordance with Part II of The Forest and Prairie Protection Regulations. All brush and debris cleared from the site of operations shall be disposed within 12 months of commencement of-operations. Dispose of all non-combustible debris resulting from the operations by burn all brush. 7. All top soil is to be stripped and piled separately from brush-and sub-soil in order p that it may be evenly distributed over the excavation area for reclamation-purposes. 8. Keep the area free and clear of all debris at all times unless otherwise authorized by an officer of the Minister. I9. Progressively reclaim the land to its original use or to an authorized alternative land use. j.0. Take all necessary precautions and safeguards to prevent the inception of soil erosion and siltation of any watercourse. 1. The entire area shall be reclaimed to the satisfaction of the Minister and should include: (a) Backsloping and levelling. m (b) Replacement of soil overburden. (c) Re-establishment of a satisfactory growth of vegetation on all bare soil areas. ' (d) Provision of drainage where required. 12. The lease area should be kept free of-noxious weeds. ... 2*». •. .' -38— - 2 - 13. Should the lease be cancelled prior to exhaustion of gravel supply, the operator shall revegetate all the excavated area except for the open face of the pit which shall remain open so that all useable gravel can be extracted to avoid mixing overburden with useable gravel. 14; Stockpiling*of gravel is prohibited without prior approval from Alberta Energy and Natural Resources. 15. Existing trails are to be used for access. 16. A fire permit is required for any burning between April 1 and October 31. fB"j 1 1 -39 — MUNICIPAL DISTRICT OF BRAZEAU NO. 77 BY-LAW NO. 111-90 BEING A BY-LAW OF THE MUNICIPAL DISTRICT OF BRAZEAU NO. 77, IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA, RESPECTING NUISANCES AND UNSIGHTLY AND UNTIDY PREMISES. WHEREAS, by Section 160 of the Municipal Government Act, Chapter M-26, R.S.A. 1980, and amendments thereto, Council may pass p By-Laws for preventing and compelling the abatement of nuisances generally, and regulating untidy and unsightly premises; and WHEREAS, Council deems it expedient and in the public interest to pass this By-Law pursuant to the said Section 160; NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the Municipal District of Brazeau No. 77, duly assembled, enacts as follows: 1. This By-Law may be sited as the "Nuisance By-Law" of the Municipal District of Brazeau No. 77 in the Province of Alberta. 2. Definitions (1) "Council" means the Council of the Municipal District of Brazeau No. 77. (2) "Municipal District" means the Municipal District of Brazeau No. 77. (3) "Nuisance" means dangerous, source of danger, offensive, annoying, unpleasant or obnoxious thing, object or PI practice which causes an intrusion, disturbance, or condition not in the general public interest. (4) "Person" - includes corporation, firm partnership, individual person, his or her heirs, executors, administrators, or other legal representatives. 3. No person being the owner, agent, lessee or occupier of any land or premises within the Municipal District of Brazeau No. 77 shall permit a condition to exist on the land or premises of which such person is the owner, agent, lessee or occupier that constitutes a nuisance. 4. No person being the owner, agent, lessee or occupier of any land or premises within the Municipal District of Brazeau No. 77 shall permit the land or premises of which such person is the owner, agent, lessee or occupier to be or to remain untidy and unsightly. 5. (1) Council, may by resolution, declare that a condition on land or premises constitutes a nuisance or that land or premises are in an untidy and unsightly condition and may require the owner, agent, lessee or occupier to: (a) remove any litter causing or contributing to the untidy and unsightly condition of the land or premises, (b) construct a fence, wall, screen or similar structure to prevent the untidy and unsightly land or premises from being viewed from any highway or other public place, or (c) remedy the condition in such other manner as Council may direct, within the time period specified in the resolution. HO- BY-LAW NO. 111-90 - 2 - (2) In the event that an owner, agent, lessee or occupier fails, neglects or refuses to comply with a resolution passed by Council pursuant to Subsection (1), Council may: (a) cause such work to be done as it considers necessary to remedy the condition, and (b) charge the cost of the work done to remedy the condition to the owner, agent, lessee or occupier, and in default of payment, (i) recover the cost as a debt due to the municipality, or (ii) charge the cost against the land concerned as taxes due and owing in respect of that land and 1 recover the cost as such. (3) A person who enters property to remedy a condition as directed by Council shall be deemed to have the "^ authorization of Council and shall not incur any liability therefore. The Municipal Manager or any person he or she so designates, ,« are hereby authorized to enter into any lands, buildings or premises within the Municipal District to inspect for conditions that may constitute a nuisance or contravene or fail to comply with the provisions of Sections 3 and 4 of this By— Law. r^ (1) The owner, agent, lessee or occupier of any land or premises within the Municipal District (a) who fails to remedy in such manner as Council may direct, any condition of his land that fails to comply with the provision of this By-Law, or (b) who contravenes or fails to comply with the "** provision of this By-Law, may be subject to a fine as provided in the Provincial Offenses Procedure Act, being Chapter P-21.5 of the Revised Statutes of Alberta, 1980. (wfft READ a first time this 26th day of September A.D., 1990. READ a second time this day of , A.D., 1990. READ a third time and finally passed this day of , A.D., 1990. REEVE MUNICIPAL MANAGER i w\ _m p MANAGER'S REPORT TO COUNCIL REPORT NO.: M-12-90 DATE: 90 10 18 SUBJECT: SCHEDULE OF FEES FOR 1991 RECOMMENDATION: That the attached By-Law No. 115-90 be given first reading. REPORT: The Schedule of Fees By-Law has been reviewed and recommendations made for 1991. pi Generally it is recommended that utility rates increase by 5% and others remain the same or modestly adjusted. 1991 will see the effects of the 6.S.T. The only rate recommended to be inclusive of G.S.T. is the Willey West Park fees which due to self registration would be difficult to deal with change. At this point we are aware the utility charges pi are not subject to G.S.T. but services such as snowplowing, grading, maps, cemetary plots, park fees, etc., are subject to the tax. other items still need further clarification. Final approval to this By-Law is recommended by mid November in order to notify users of any increases in advance. p ^pi ipi I -na- MUNICIPAL DISTRICT OF BRAZEAU NO. 77 BY-LAW NO. 115-90 BEING A BY-LAW OF THE MUNICIPAL DISTRICT OF BRAZEAU NO. 77, IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA, TO ESTABLISH A SCHEDULE OF FEES. WHEREAS, the Municipal District of Brazeau No. 77 deems it expedient to set and review, as necessary, from time to time various fees of the Municipality; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the Planning Act, Chapter P-9, RSA 1980 and amendments thereto, the Municipal Taxation Act, Chapter M-31, RSA 1980 and amendments thereto, the Municipal Government Act, Chapter M-26, RSA 1980 and amendments thereto, the Municipal District of Brazeau Incorporation Act, being Chapter M-24.4, RSA 1980, as well as other provincial legislation that is in effect. NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the Municipal District of Brazeau No. 77, in the Province of Alberta, duly assembled enacts and adopts the Schedule of Fees, attached to and forming Schedule "A" of this By-Law; and THAT, this By-Law shall come into force and effect the 1st day of January, 1991; and THAT, By-Law No. 75-89 be rescinded upon this By-Law coming into force and effect. READ a first time this day of , A.D., 1990. READ a second time this day of , A.D., 1990. READ a third time and finally passed this day of , A.D., 1990. REEVE MUNICIPAL MANAGER : 1 -H3- SCHEDULE OF FEES BY-LAW (BEING SCHEDULE "A" TO BY-LAW NO. 115-90) DESCRIPTION RATE 1990 1991 PEftNMTIK? MTO DEVHT/lPMgliT 1* Development Permit Applications (i) Record of Development No Charge No charge (ii) Development Permit pj - Residential/Home Occupation $ 25.00 $ 25.00 - Commercial/Industrial up to $250,000 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 - $250,000 to $500,000 $100.00 $100.00 - over $500,000 $200.00 $200.00 2. M Development Appeal Board - per appeal $100.00 $100.00 3. Zoning Compliance Certificate $ 25.00 $ 25.00 4. Amendment Applications (i) Land-Use By-Law $250.00 $250.00 (refund if not proceeding) ($125.00) ($125.00) (ii) General Municipal Plan $500.00 $500.00 (refund if not proceeding) ($250.00) ($250.00) 5. Planning Documents (i) General Municipal Plan $ 10.00 $10.00 (ii) Land-Use By-Law $ 10.00 $10.00 (iii) Area Structure Plans $ 5.00 $ 5.00 B. PUBLIC WORKS 1« Snow Plowing of Private Driveways (i) Seniors, Disabled, Handicapped or Widows No Charge No Charge (ii) Community Centres, Churches, Cemetaries No Charge No Charge (iii) Medical Attention/Funerals No Charge No Charge _i4,i4 — - 2 - SCHEDULE "A" - BY-LAW NO. 115-90 DESCRIPTION RATE 1990 1991 (iv) Residents - 1st three free then - government rate Actual Cost Actual Cost - minimum charge $ 15.00 $16.00 (v) Commercial - government rate Actual Cost Actual Cost - minimum charge $ 15.00 $16.00 (vi) School Divisions - government rate Actual Cost Actual cost 2. Grading (i) Community Centres No Charge No charge &%$. (ii) Trailer Courts Govt. Rate Govt. Rate + 10% + 10% (iii) School Divisions Govt. Rate Govt. Rate 3. Dust Control (i) Main Roads - Heavy Use No Charge No Charge (ii) Other - for 300 feet per application - 1st application per year $100.00 $100.00 - Each additional $ 50.00 $ 50.00 (iii) Additional Length At Cost At Cost (iv) Industrial/Commercial At Cost At COSt (v) Schools, plus where warranted, _ by policy NO Charge No Charge 4. Shop (i) Labour Rate - Warranty Work Actual Cost Actual Cost + 15% + 15% - Internal Actual Cost Actual Cost 5. Grader Blades - Each - Used $ l.oo $ 1.00 6* Used culverts - % of new price Max. 50% Max. 50% C?$!\ -45- - 3 - SCHEDULE "A" - BY-LAW NO. 115-90 DESCRIPTION RATE 1990 1991 7. Overnight Camping (i) willey West Park - per night $ 5.00 $7.00* 8. (a) Sale of Water (i) Hamlet of Rocky Rapids bi-monthly $ 40.00 $42.00 (ii) Hamlet of Poplar Ridge D.V. Rates D.V. Rates (b) Miscellaneous Water Rates (i) Deposit - Refundable on final billing $ 40.00 $42.00 (ii) Turn on Service after non payment shut off - during normal business hours $ 15.00 $16.00 - after normal business hours $ 30.00 $32.00 (iii) Service call At Cost At cost - normal office hours - minimum M charge $ 15.00 $16.00 - after normal hours - minimum charge $ 30.00 $32.00 (iv) New Customer Fee - prior to moving in $ 10.00 $10.00 - after moving in $ 30.00 $32.00 Wl 9* (a) Sewage Rates (i) Hamlet of Rocky Rapids - bi-monthly - Residential $16.00 $16.80 - Commercial $18.10 $19.00 (ii) Hamlet of violet Grove - bi-monthly - Residential $16.00 $16.80 - Commercial $18.10 $19.00 Includes G.S.T. if in effect. p» -Mb — - 4 - SCHEDULE "A11 - BY-LAW NO. 115-90 i DESCRIPTION RATE 1990 1991 (iii) Hamlet of Buck creek - bi-monthly - Residential $16.00 $16.80 1 - Commercial $18.10 $19.00 Wfi (iv) Hamlet of Lodgepole - bi-monthly - Residential $16.00 $16.80 - Commercial $18.10 $19.00 1 (v) Hamlet of Poplar Ridge - bi-monthly f#M - Residential $16.00 $16.80 - Commercial - up to 350 IGD $18.10 $19.00 - Commercial - each 100 IGD «- over 350 $ 5.15 $ 5.40 j (b) Miscellaneous Sewage charges (i) Deposit - Refundable on final billing $ 20.00 $21.00 (ii) service Call At Cost At Cost - normal office hours - minimum charge $ 15.00 $16.00 - after office hours - minimum charge $ 30.00 $32.00 (iii) New Customer Fee - prior to moving in $ 10.00 $10.00 - after moving in $ 30.00 $32.00 - if connecting to water No Charge No Charge 10. Approaches (i) Permit Fee - commercial/industrial i (non-refundable) $100.00 $100.00 - residential (refundable) $100.00 $100.00 (ii) Subdivision -Deposit (refundable) $500.00 $500.00 — MIS - 5 - SCHEDULE "A" - BY-LAW NO. 115-90 DESCRIPTION RATE 1990 1991 m 11- Sand and Gravel fco ^"^unity Groups (i) Community Halls, Cemetaries and Ball Diamonds - 1st three loads per year Free Free - over three loads per year At Cost At cost (ii) other Groups - Non Profit At cost At cost C. ADMINIflTRATTOM !• Assessment and Tax Certificates (i) Tax Certificate $ 15.00 $15.00 (ii) Assessment Records $ 10.00 $10.00 (iii) Landowner Names (in excess of two) - each $ 2.00 $ 2.00 r - Utility Companies/Government No Charge No Charge 2. Penalties on Accounts (i) Utilities - percentage per month (new - 30 days from billing) 10% 10% - minimum penalty 0 0 (ii) General Receivables - percentage per month 1.5% 1.5% (iii) Taxes and Mobil Home Licences By By-Law By By-Law 3. Tax Notification Charge $ 50.00 r $50.00 4. Charge for NSF cheques $ 15.00 $15.00 5. Photocopying (i) Community or Charitable pi Organizations - per page $ .10 $ .10 (ii) Minutes, By-Laws, Plans - per page $ 1.00 $ 1.00 -^8- - 6 - SCHEDULE "A" - BY-LAW NO. 115-90 DESCRIPTION RATES 1990 1991 (iii) Computer Printouts - per page $ .50 $ .50 *~ (iv) Documents - 1st 20 pages - per page $ i.oo $ 1.00 m - excess of 20 pages - per P*9° $ .25 $ .25 6. M.D. Maps - Black and White $ 5.00 $ 5.00 ^ - Coloured $ 10.00 $10.00 7. M.D. Hats $ 6-00 $ 6.00 ^ D. AGRICULTURE 1. Cattle Scale - Per Day $ 15.00 $ 15.00 1 2. Cattle Squeeze - Per Day $ 15.00 $ 15.00 3. Small or Large Calf Table - Per Day $ 15.00 $ 15.00 4. Loading chute - Per Day $ 15.00 $ 15.00 m 5. coral Panels - Per Day $ 15.00 $ 15.00 6. Loading Chute and Coral Panels "" - Per Day $ 15#00 $ 15-0o * 7. Barrel Sprayers - Per Day $15.00 $15.00 *i 8. ATV Sprayer - Per Day $ 15.00 $ 15.00 9. Back Pack sprayers - Per Day $15.00 $5.00 1 10. Slip-in Sprayer - Per Day $ 30.00 $ 30.00 11. Cleaning Charge - Per Use $ 25.00 $ 25.00 12. Tree Planter - Per Day $ 15.00 n 13. Hand Spreader/Seeder - Per Day $ 5.00 1 -4R- - 7 - SCHEDULE "A" - BY-LAW NO. 115-90 DESCRIPTION RATES 1990 1991 Ipl ~ E. Jf»C»8«B> 1. Homemaker - Per hour Fee (Gross Income) (i) Monthly income - less than $700•oo/month $ 2.50 $ 2.50 (ii) Monthly income - $700.00 - $799.00/month $ 3.00 $ 3.00 (iii) Monthly Income - $800.00 - B| $899.oo/month $ 3.25 $ 3.25 (iv) Monthly income - $900.00 - •SI $999.00/month $ 3.50 $ 3.50 (v) Monthly Income - $1,000.00 $1,099.oo/month $ 4.00 $ 4.00 (vi) Monthly Income - $1,100.00 $1,199.oo/month $ 4.25 $ 4.25 (vii) Monthly Income - $1,200.00 $1,299.00/month $ 4.50 $ 4.50 '$•) (viii) Monthly Income - $1,300.00 $1,399.00 $ 4.50 $ 4.50 (ix) Monthly Income - $1,400.00 $1,499.00 $ 4.75 $ 4.75 pPI (x) Monthly Income - $1,500.00 • $1,599.00 $ 5.00 $ 5.00 pi (xi) Monthly income - $1,600.00 • $1,699.oo/month $ 5.25 $ 5.25 (xii) Monthly Income - $1,700.00 • $1,799.oo/month $ 5.25 $ 5.25 (xiii) Monthly Income - $1,800.00 - $1,899.00/month $ 5.50 $ 5.50 (xiv) Monthly Income - $1,900.00 - $1,999.oo/month $ 6.50 $ 6.50 ip fjtfSB -50- - 8 - SCHEDULE "A" - BY-LAW NO. 115-90 DESCRIPTION RATES 1990 1991 (xv) Monthly income - $2,000.00 - $2,099.oo/month $ 7.00 $ 7.00 (xvi) Monthly Income - $2,100.00 - $2,199.00/month $ 7.50 $ 7.50 (xvii) Monthly Income - $2,200.00 and over $ 8.50 $ 8.50 2. Homehelo (i) Contracting Agencies/Income over $45,000/year - per hour $ 11.70 $ 11.70 (ii) Clients Income $20,000 to $45,000/year - per hour $ 6.50 $ 6.50 (iii) Clients Income $10,000 to $20,000/year - per hour $ 4.00 $ 4.00 (iv) Clients Income less than $10,000/year - per hour $ 3.00 $ 3.00 f!^ | Note: Maximum 32 hours per year. F. MTfiCHT.TAWHniTg J 1« Cemetarv Plots - Resident $ 50.00 $ 50.00 - Non-Resident $200.00 $200.00 2. Grazing Land Leases (i) Road Allowances - per half mile per year or portion thereof $20.00 $20.00 - minimum charge $ 20.00 $ 20.00 (ii) Land - per cultivated acre per year (plus taxes) $ 10.00 $ 10.00 - minimum charge (plus taxes) $ 20.00 $ 20.00 1 1 -5) — si » o SCHEDULE "A11 - BY-LAW NO. 115-90 DESCRIPTION jy^S 1990 1991 (iii) Municipal Reserve - crop r Production Permit - up to 20 acres - per year $ 35.00 $ 35.00 - over 20 acres - per acre over $10.00 $ 10.00 NOTE: unless indicated specifically G.S.T. will be in addition to the established rates. r 18 P> -5 ii** WATER RESOURCES Office of the Chairman COMMISSION 910 Harley Court, 10045-111 Street, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T5K 2M5 403/422-4232 October 4, 1990 1 To All Municipal Representatives: The Alberta Water Resources Commission (AWRC) is now conducting a public review of the draft policy for the management of wetlands in the settled area of the province. Public consultation will help the provincial government develop a policy that best reflects the desires i of Albertans. The draft policy has been widely distributed to interested individuals and organizations and many people have completed the response form at the back ofthe document. Staff of the AWRC have also presented the policy to a variety of public interest groups. Public open house and workshop sessions will be held in 14 towns and cities throughout the . settled area in late October and November, 1990 (see attached information sheet). Members of the AWRC and departmental representatives will attend all sessions and will host small group discussions about the future of wetlands. All comments from the public will be carefully considered by the AWRC and a summary of comments will be forwarded to Cabinet with a recommended policy in 1991. I would welcome you and others with an interest in wetland management to attend the open house/workshop sessions in your area. Please direct requests for further information to the Alberta Water Resources Commission at 422-4232 in Edmonton. f^m i 1 Alan Hylan Chairman AH/bh Encl. iii pi -S3- What About Wetlands? The Alberta Water Resources Commission invites you to attend public workshops to discuss the draft policy for the management ofwetlands in the settled area of Alberta. Commission members and government representatives will host small groups to discuss your ideas about the future of |P wetlands. To obtain a copy of the draft policy or further information, please call the Commission at 422-4232 in Edmonton. The meetings start at 6:30 p.m. with an open house and continue with workshops at 7:30 p.m. The dates and locations are: Date Location October 25, 1990 Lethbridge - El Rancho Motor Hotel October 29 Brooks - Heritage Inn October 30 Calgary - Marlborough Inn November 6 Innisfail - Country Lodge November 7 Castor - Community Hall November 8 Wainwright - Commuhiplex November 15 Edmonton - Capilano Inn A November 20 Two Hills - Centennial Hall November 21 Bonnyville - Senior Citizen's Drop-In Center November 22 Barrhead - Legion Hall November 26 Grande Prairie - Trumpeter Motor Inn November 27 McLennan - McLennan Motor Inn November 28 Fairview - Dunvegan Motor Inn November 29 Fort Vermilion - Community Complex •p _ rtevu*-i -5M- l RECYCLING COUNCIL OF ALBERTA P.O. BOX 2100, STN. M (#27), CALGARY, ALBERTA T2P 2M5 October 9, 1990 1 Dear AUMA Member: The Recycling Council of Alberta cordially invites members of the AUMA to attend our semi-annual meeting on Saturday and Sunday, November 10 and 11 at the Mayfield Inn in Edmonton. The topics of our meeting will include a discussion of Canada's Green Plan and Alberta's Proposed Environment Enhancement Legislation. We expect to explore the legislative and policy areas which need to be addressed at the local, provincial and federal levels in order to stimulate the economic climate needed to enable us to meet the challenges of a global environmental agenda. The emphasis, of course, will be on recycling. Registration will be limited to 250 persons including members of the Recycling Council of Alberta. We invite you to complete the registration form on the reverse side of this letter at your earliest convenience as registration will be on a first come, first served basis. Yours- truly, Cornelius Guenter, Ph.D. President f™?5i i -55- REGISTRATION FORM Recycling Council of Alberta Semi-Annual Meeting The Mayfield Inn November 10 and 11, 1990 Registration Fee x $50 each for Current Members (Includes Saturday Evening Dinner) x $90 each for Non-Members (Includes Saturday Evening Dinner) x $30 each for Saturday Evening Dinner Only x $30 each for Daily Registration (Non-Membes) (Saturday Evening Dinner Not Included) x $10 each for Daily Registration (Members) (Saturday Evening Dinner Not Included) Total Remitted: $ Name: Organization Address: Ph City Pos.Code Please remit registration form Recycling Council of Alberta along with cheque payable to: Attn: Dave Griffiths Department of Sanitation City of Calgary PO Box 2100, Station "M" Calgary, AB T2P 2M5 Please note 25 rooms have been reserved at the Mayfield Inn at $69/night. Reservations must be made by October 27 to receive this special rate by calling The Mayfield Inn at 1-800-661-9804. Accommodations may also be considered at the following westend hotels: West End: Fantasyland Hotel at West Edmonton Mall 1-800-661-6454 Relax Inn, 18320 Stony Plain Road 1-800-661-6031 Best Western Westwood Inn, 18035 Stony Plain Road 483-7770 -5b- RECYCLING COPNCTT. OP &t.pbpto NOVEMBER 10 AND 11. 1990 THE MAYFIELD INN, EDMONTPW, hvmbot* Saturday, November 10, 1990 9:00-9:30 a.m. - Registration and Coffee 9:30 - 10:00 a.m. - Welcome and Opening Remarks Her Worship Jan Reimer, Mayor T City of Edmonton J 10:00 a.m. - 12:00 Noon Topic: Government of Canada Green Plan Moderator: Her Worship Kay McKenzie, Mayor, Town of Vegreville Speaker: The Honourable Don Mazankowski Deputy Prime Minister f^ffj 12 Noon - 1:30 p.m. - Lunch Break* 1:30 - 4:00 p.m. Topic: Government of Alberta Draft of Proposed Environmental Protection Enhancement Legislation Moderator: Rick Dvorkin, President, Calgary Metal (1985) Ltd. Speaker: Vance MacNichol Deputy Minister Alberta Environment ^ 5:30 - 6:00 p.m. - No Host Reception 6:00 - 8:00 p.m. Master of Cornelius Guenter, President Ceremonies: Recycling Council of Alberta Dinner Speaker: Honourable Ralph Klein Minister of Environment Province of Alberta The Mayfield Inn has three restaurants. Guests are invited to have lunch at their own expense. -SI- I Sunday, November 11. 1990, The Mayfield Inn m 8:30 - 9:15 a.m. - Coffee Service 9:15 - 10:45 a.m. p Moderator: Kathleen McKilligan, Resource Protection L Specialist, Northern Telecom p Panel: "What's In It For Us?" 1. City of Calgary: Dave Griffiths, Department of Sanitation 2. Stanley Engineering: Konrad Fichtner, Waste Management 3. Alberta Urban Communities: Her Worship Anita Ratchinsky, t Mayor, City of St. Albert 4. Industry: Ron Stern, President, Alberta Newsprint Company p 5. City of Edmonton: Alderman Bruce Campbell, City of Edmonton 10:45 - 11:00 a.m. - Remembrance Dav Ceremony Officiated by Reverend William A. Roberts, MLA 11:00 - 11:30 a.m. - Wrap-up: Jim McOuarrie, CBC I 11:30 a.m. - Closing Remarks Cornelius Guenter, President P Recycling Council of Alberta p CO .• CO Recycling Council of Alberta RECYCLINGCOUNCILOF ALBERTA BOX2100. STN.M (127) CALGARY,ALBERTA • i v k. smvls runru&t :> r- I j ^rw^j r^^u member: 1' JJECT JNCil OF ALBERTA «-J? !1 ,eCt ,°f t,he RecVc«no Council of Alberta is to promote the develoo- Mr. SZn^f0nt nUUy of a" formS ifCycling and resourceTecovert as wm Individual Name Mrs. ponents of environmentally sound waste management in Alberta Ms. Company/Affiliation PURPOSES •• • Recycling Involvement Municipal Gov't (If any) Provincial Gov't a) i^^T:T^^z°i::zs:ren lndus,ries-co,iec,ors-and Service Group Business b) Lzro?;derrop,rxca,ion pro9ram ma! wi"cfea,e an Other Type of Recycling d) To encourage market development for recycled materials. Address • Company e) I°a.en,C?UraQf researcn *" the development of new ways to recvcia Address - Home materials and in new uses for recycled materials. y Telephone * mSf9fealer 8Wareness jn conservation with respect to packaging Business Home g) To deal with recycling Issues as determined from time-to-time. Type of Membership Corporate - Voting - $100.00 Corporate - Non-Resident - $100.00 (Non-Voting) MEMBERSHIP - There shall be four classifications: Individual • Voting - $40.00 Supporting - Non-Voting • $25.00 8) ?£r£l*fTbk~ Enllt,ed to one (1>vote- AnV j^ividu^l or organiza- Student - Non-Voting*$10.00 mJLmanagement,^ t0andbeIs enga9edin residentinorwealing,In operationresourcein the pZXoTmS^recovery or waste Payment Attached b> «rdll?;Wfenl~ Entlt,ed t0 no vole- AnV indlv'dua« or organiza- Payment To Recycling Council of Alberta «onmanagementdeemed andto benotengagedan Albertain resident.recycling, resource recovery«wjvwy or waste P.O.Box 2100, Stn. M(#27) Calgary, Alberta C) "ttaTJl^TierrJnme6 lo °ne (1) vote- A^ indlvid^l or organize T2P 2M5 ™t!^t0 be ,nd.,reCt,y assoc,ated "»" recycling, resource recover or waste management, and is in resident or in operation in the Province of Correspondence Directed To — Home — Business cP - f^r^L7iMember 7 Emil,ed !° n° VOte-A^ ,ndjvidual ^ organization Si wS £ 'k SX!TnlnQ ,he °b|8Ct and DurP°se8 °f tne council and wishes to be informed through council newsletter, general meeting Are You Available To Serve On a Committee I minutes, and other published recycling information 9 Yes No 1 -bo- ALBERTA ASSOCIATION of MUNICIPAL DISTRICTS & COUNTIES 4504-101 STREET • EDMONTON. ALBERTA T6E 5G9 TELEPHONE 436-9375 FAX-13' LARRY GOODHOPE - EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR cV c^ October'10, 1990 PEOPLE WORKING WITH PEOPLE (A Team Building Seminar for Municipal Councillors) Participants will learn the following skills: 1. How to listen more effectively. 2. How to resolve conflict. 3. How their perceptions influence their actions. 4. How to adjust their range of expression to interact more effectively with others. 5. How to give and receive instructions more effectively. 6. How to create success for others. PLUS 1. Have the opportunity to discuss other relevant issues with councillors. This Team Building Seminar will be held on MONDAY NOVEMBER 12. 1990 during the hours of 9:30 A.M. to 4:30 P.M. at the CONVENTION INN, Edmonton. PREREGISTRATION IS REQUIRED Administrators are requested to submit the full names of their councillors who wish to attend by way of letter to Ethel Robinson at the A.A.M.D. & C. office. Please send a cheque for $35 per person with your registration. Registration is limited to 100 participants and the registration fee includes all seminar materials, coffee and lunch. DEADLINE FOR REGISTRATION IS NOVEMBER 1, 1990 ALBERTA ASSOCIATION ~bl of MUNICIPAL DISTRICTS & COUNTIES 4504-101 STREET . EDMONTON. ALBERTA T6E 5G9 . TELEPHONE 436-9375 . FAX <1 LARRY GOODHOPE - EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR October 10, 1990 ALBERTA ASSOCIATION OF MUNICIPAL DISTRICTS AND COUNTIES 1990 FALL CONVENTION PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS NOVEMBER 12 - 16, 1990 Your Board of Directors and staff have developed the attached convention program. We hope you will enjoy this years convention and welcome your participation. Some of the highlights that you may be interested in are as follows: CONVENTION THEME At the 1989 convention, our theme was "Challenge the 90V. The 1990 convention theme is "Meeting the Challenges". COUNCILLOR WORKSHOP NOVEMBER 12, 1990 We have one workshop for councillors on the Mondav of convention week. 9:00 A.M. TO 4:30 P.M. at the CONVENTION INN. The workshop encompasses "Leadership and Team Building". Separate registration and a prepaid registration fee of $35 per person attending is required. Separate registration is required. Details are included elsewhere in this mailing. There is a limited registration of 100 people, based upon our survey of those showing interest earlier this year. ADMINISTRATOR WORKSHOP NOVEMBER 12, 1990 All administrators are invited to attend a final seminar on the G.S.T.. There is no charge for this seminar which will run from 9:00 A.M. TO 4:30 P.M. at the CONVENTION INN. No registration will be required. As the presenters will be the same as those at the regional seminars held in October, they should be well versed on the G.S.T. and municipalities needs. - GET ACQUAINTED EVENING NOVEMBER 12, 1990 . Entertainment by the "Whistling Brakeman" sponsored by Reed Stenhouse. T MArN CONVENTION ] NOVEMBER 13 - 16, 1990 « Although Premier Getty has not confirmed his attendance as at this date, we anticipate his taking part in your convention along 1 with 20 cabinet ministers. The Honourable Ray Speaker has again committed himself to ™] the major portion of the week. J Our opening speakers The Calloways" will entertain and J inform you with their presentation on practical tips on how people can alter their lifestyles to help save an ailing environment. They ^ are a husband and wife team with a wealth of knowledge about "grass-roots" solutions to environmental problems that we can all assume a personal responsibility for. Their message is delivered in "1 a nonjudgmental fashion - with a little vaudeville! For the Thursday evening social, we have the "Emeralds" - back j by popular demand. (wfyi On Friday, we have Nyle Henderson - Cowboy Poet, back by popular demand. He has assured us that his entertainment will be different then at our 1988 convention. ACCOMPANYING GUESTS PROGRAM Councillors are reminded to give the attached "Accompanying Guests Program" to the appropriate party. i ~b3— 4 October 1990 ALBERTA ASSOCIATION OF MUNICIPAL DISTRICTS AND COUNTIES November 12 - 16, 1990 Terrace Inn, Edmonton fp 1990 FALL CONVENTION TENTATIVE PROGRAM MONDAY. NOVEMBER 12. 1990 3:00 P.M. Registration Desk Opens Foyer - Level P2 9:30 A.M. COUNCILLOR and ADMINISTRATOR WORKSHOPS Councillor - Leadership and Team Building Administrator - G.S.T. 3:00 P.M. Reeves Meeting - Iris Evans, Chairman 8:00 P.M. WINE AND CHEESE - GET ACQUAINTED HOUR Imperial Room - Level PI -- Terrace Inn Courtesy Reed Stenhouse TUESDAY. NOVEMBER 13r IQQfl 8:00 A.M. REGISTRATION DESK OPENS FOYER - LEVEL P2 9:00 A.M. 'O' CANADA INVOCATION - Reverend Tom Forgrave ADDRESS OF WELCOME Hon. Don Getty Premier of Alberta ADDRESS OF WELCOME Her Worship Jan Reimer Mayor, City of Edmonton p> ADDRESS OF WELCOME Hon. Helen Hunley Lieutenant Governor Province of Alberta IN MEMORIAM ELECTION OF CONVENTION CHAIRMAN PRESIDENTS ADDRESS REPORTS Executive Report Trading Division Report Trading Division Financial Report Jubilee Insurance Agencies Ltd. Report Jubilee Insurance Agencies Ltd. Financial Report General and Building Account Financial Report 9:45 A.M. OPENING SPEAKER - The Calloways 10:45 A.M. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND ENHANCEMENT *] Hon. Ralph Klein, Minister of Environment 1 Question Period 11:50 A.M. INTRODUCTION OF FRATERNAL DELEGATES Alberta Association of Agricultural Fieldmen Alberta Assessors' Association Alberta Hospital Association "1 Improvement Districts Association of Alberta - Alberta Provincial Fire Chiefs' Association Alberta School Trustees' Association Alberta Urban Municipalities Association Alberta Rural Municipal Administrators Association Unifarm Alberta Teachers Association Society of Local Government Managers Association of Municipal Public Works Supervisors 12:00 NOON LUNCH ON YOUR OWN AFTERNOON SESSION 1:30 P.M. ADDRESS Hon. Ray Speaker, Minister of Municipal Affairs Question Period 2:15 P.M. FRATERNAL GREETINGS FROM: Saskatchewan Association of Rural Municipalities Union of Manitoba Municipalities cs Rural Ontario Municipalities Association Union of British Columbia Municipalities Federation of Canadian Municipalities 2:45 P.M. POLICING IN THE 90'S & R.C.M.P. CONTRACT RENEWAL Hon. Dick Fowler, Solicitor General Question Period 3:30 P.M. RESOLUTIONS d$ i 7:30 P.M. SOCIAL EVENING -COURTESY R.ANGUS (Alberta) Ltd. WEDNESDAY. NOVEMBER 14. 1990 9.00 A.M. NOMINATIONS FOR PRESIDENT 9:15 A.M. RESOLUTIONS 9:45 A.M. AGRICULTURE'S FUTURE «* Hon. Ernie Isley, Minister of Agriculture j Question Period i PI -bS— p 10:30 A.M. FARMERS' ADVOCATE pn Cliff Downey - Farmers' Advocate 10:50 A.M. WILDLAND/URBAN INTERFACE - Ken Saulit, Fire Chief, County of Parkland and Kelly O'Shea, Alberta Forest Service ' 11:30 A.M. p GENERAL SAFETY ACT UPDATE - Al Kennedy, Acting Deputy Minister -Alberta Labor 'i Question Period 12:00 NOON LUNCH ON YOUR OWN AFTERNOON SESSION 1:30 P.M. AGRICULTURE AND THE ENVIRONMENT r Hon. Shirley McLellan, Associate Minister ofAgriculture Question Period r 2:00 P.M. ELECTION OF PRESIDENT L 2:15 P.M. RAY MARTIN, M.L.A., NEW DEMOCRATIC PARTY Leader of Official Opposition 3) 2:30 P.M. MUNICIPAL STATUTES REVIEW COMMITTEE Glen Clegg, M.L.A. - Chairman 3:00 P.M. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOR ALBERTA r Hon. Peter Elzinga, Minister of Economic Development and Trade Question Period IP 3:45 P.M. RESOLUTIONS \L 7:30 P.M. BLACKWOOD HODGE SOCIAL EVENING n CONVENTION INN THURSDAY. NOVEMBER 15. 1990 Wi 9:00 A.M. NOMINATIONS FOR VICE PRESIDENT 1 9:15 A.M. RESOLUTIONS 9:45 A.M. PRESENTATION OF LONG SERVICE AWARDS P) Hon. Ray Speaker, Minister of Municipal Affairs 10:00 A.M. MINISTERIAL FORUM 1(QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS) MODERATOR - Hon. Ray Speaker, Minister of Municipal Affairs r Hon. Ken Kowalski Hon. Elaine McCoy Hon. Fred Stewart Hon. Dick Johnston Hon. Peter Trynchy Hon. Don Sparrow Hon. LeRoy Fjordbotten 11:00 A.M. MINISTERIAL FORUM 2(QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS) MODERATOR - Hon. Ray Speaker, Minister of Municipal Affairs Hon. Steve West Hon. Nancy Betkowski Hon. Ken Rostad Hon. John Oldring Hon. Jim Dinning Hon. John Gogo -bb- 12:00 NOON NO HOST BAR - CONVENTION INN 12:30 P.M. DELEGATE LUNCHEON (By Ticket) AFTERNOON SESSION 1:30 P.M. ALBERTA PACIFIC FOREST-INDUSTRIES Ed Taylor, V.P. Finance and Administration Economic Spinoff Opportunities from Pulp and Paper for « Albertans 2:00 P.M. ELECTION OF VICE PRESIDENT 2:45 P.M. LAURENCE DECORE, LIBERAL M.L.A. 3:00 P.M. MINISTER OF TRANSPORTATION AND UTILITIES Hon. Al "Boomer" Adair, Minister QUESTION PERIOD 3:45 P.M. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS FOR DISTRICTS 1 & 4 7:00 P.M. ASSOCIATION SOCIAL EVENING Terrace Inn, Jubilee Ballroom - Level P2 Smorg Dinner - Dance to follow with the "Emeralds" 1 FRIDAY. NOVEMBER 16. 1990 9:00 A.M. JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS AND THE ENVIRONMENT Ernie Walter, Q.C. Solicitor to the Association Question Period 9:45 A.M. LIVESTOCK SITING AND LAND USE PLANNING Adhoc Committee Report 10:00 A.M. ALBERTA LOCAL AUTHORITIES RECIPROCAL INSURANCE EXCHANGE 10:30 A.M. RESOLUTIONS 10:45 A.M. GUEST ENTERTAINER Nyle Henderson - Cowboy Poet UNFINISHED BUSINESS DRAWS « VOTE OF THANKS j THE QUEEN HAVE A SAFE TRIP HOME i i r-'^m f== WELCOME ACCOMPANYING GUESTS TO THE 82nd ANNUAL CONVENTION OF THE ALBERTA ASSOCIATION OF MUNICIPAL DISTRICTS AND COUNTIES HOSTESSES: Audrey Miller Theresa Papworth Ann Fabian Patricia Slangcr Theresa DeChamplain Irene Sorgaarci I I \ 9:45 a.m. Tuesday, November 13 7:30 P.M. BLACKWOOD HODGE Partners are welcome to SOCIAL EVENING (P attend and listen to the keynote Convention Inn Ballroom speakers, The Calloways' and I their entertaining presentation Thursday, November 16 on our personalresponsibility for A TOTAL FREE DAY the environment. Terrace Inn Ballroom 7:00 P.M. ASSOCIATION SOCIAL EVENING 8:00 p.m. WINE AND CHEESE Smorgasbord - Dance Featuring "The Whistling Terrace Inn Ballroom Brakeman" - Imperial Corsages courtesy of Room - Level PI, Terrace Inn Pardee Courtesy Reed Stenhouse Equipment Ltd. & Twin Tractor 12:00 Noon Tuesday, November 14 SALAD BAR 8:30 A.M. Friday, November 17 LUNCHEON BREAKFAST AT THE Convention Inn Ballroom TOP Featuring Kim Sanderson, and Convention Inn her topic "THE Courtesy Treasury ENVIRONMENTAL DIET" Branches of Plus STOP n SHOP, MINI Alberta BAZAAR 10:45 A.M. GUEST ENTERTAINER - Nyle 7:30 P.M. R. ANGUS SOCIAL Henderson "Cowboy Poet" EVENING Terrace Inn Ballroom Convention Inn Ballroom 10:30 A.M. Wednesday, November 15 STAGE WEST - BRUNCH Busses leaving 10:15 a.m. from Terrace Inn (north door) "MOVE OVER MRS. MARKHAM" featuring Bernie Kopell from the Loveboat Series on T.V. il • =j , -J ,_••• I . J -b3—* MUNICIPAL AFFAIRS Municipal Administrative Services Division Municipal Services Branch p 17th Floor, CityCentre, 10155 -102 Street, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T5J 4L4 403/427-2523 Fax 403/420-1016 BM72 October 9, 1990 W Ti Ut-- iii Reeve and Council ULfLlbQyu-ju u Lull: M.D. of tirazeau #77 Box 836 r DRAYTON VALLEY, Alberta TOE 0M0 Dear Reeve and Council: Un September 26, 1990 I had the opportunity to visit the M.D. of Brazeau for the purpose of conducting an Advisory Visit which is a follow-up to the Municipal Corporate Review completed in 1989. 1 would like to thank administration for providing me with a chance to discuss your corporate operations with the Reeve and Council, as well as some of your department heads and support staff. As you are well aware the creation of a new municipality is a long r and arduous task. It requires dedication, hard work and a positive team effort. In your role as councillors you are required to address many concerns and issues. It is not possible to agree on all matters, but once council has reached a majority decision, the decision must be accepted by all members of council. The M.D. of Brazeau has an organizational chart in place which depicts the chain of command. The direction of staff must be left to the control of the appointed personnel. From tne aspect of liability, problems could arise if individual councillors direct the staff to perform duties. Regular monthly staff meetings are a valuable method of providing employees with the opportunity to discuss areas of concern. These meetings also give administration a chance to inform staff of the events taking place in the municipality which may effect their work. Keeping the lines p? of communications open is a \/ery important part of maintaining staff morale. 90.1485.10.09.90 - 2 - I commend council and administration for the commitment they have made towards providing services to the residents of the M.D. of Brazeau. As you continue to grow and develop I have ewery confidence that the path will become more familiar and easier to maintain. On behalf of the department, thank you for the hospitality shown to me during my visit. If there is any way that I or any other member of our department can be of assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us. Yours truly, Mina Storry / Municipal Advisor MS/tlg c.c. John Erickson Municipal Manager K. Ed Thomlinson, Manager Field Advisory Services 1 on 1AUK in MQ Qf) -~71 — BERTA ASSOCIATION of MUNICIPAL DISTRICTS & COUNTIES 4504 - 101 STREET . EDMONTON. ALBERTA T6E 5G9 TELEPHONE 436-9375 FAX LARRY GOODHOPE - EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR MUNICIPAL NEWS HIGHLIGHTS PREPARED BY THE A.A.M.D.& C. October 10, 1990 30.09.90 * The M.D. of Bighorn has * Statistics Canada reports that farm cash receipts in Canada agreed to contribute $7500 toward for the period January to June 1990 the production of a videotape were 1% higher than for the same promoting tourism within the M.D. period in 1989. Higher crop and livestock receipts were enough to 01.10.90 offset a 45% decline in direct * Alberta Agriculture Minister government support payments. Ernie Isley and Associate Minister Shirley McClellan have issued a * The M.D. of Brazeau has news release stating that the method awarded a contract for the of payment of the Crow Benefit will construction of a container site at have to be changed if an agreement the Drayton Valley landfill. The on export subsidies is reached under total cost of the site, including the current GATT negotiations. The liner, sand and gravel, will be two ministers state that the Crow approximately $16,800. Alberta Benefit is perceived as an export Environment will pay up to $10,000 subsidy by the international of the total project costs. community, and that Canada must consider new ways of providing the 03.10.90 Benefit in order to ease those * The Rural Ilealth Connection concerns. The statement was Trade Show was held at the Terrace released in defence of the Inn in Edmonton on October 2 and 3. Government's new "Freedom to Choose" The event attracted 531 students and document, which proposes that the 383 health professionals to visit Benefit be bought out by the federal promotional booths representing 54 government over a 15 year period. rural communities across Alberta. 02.10.90 04.10.90 * The M.D. of Brazeau has givon * Consumer Affairs Canada has second reading to a bylaw allocating released figures indicating a 24% funds for a new curling rink in increase in the number of farm Drayton Valley. Under a cost bankruptcies in Canada in the first sharing agreement to be entered into 8 months of 1990 over the same time with the Town of Drayton Valley, the period in 1989. Saskatchewan M.D. will contribute $150,000 toward accounted for over half of the the project over the next 3 years. reported farm failures, with 139 bankruptcies. Alberta was second with 44, three more than in 1989. r M -ia- fS^ EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES Assistant Agricultural Fieldman Chief Assessor M.D. of Willow Creek No. 26 M.D. of Sturgeon The Assistant Agricultural Fieldman As the department head for will assist the Agricultural Assessment Services in the Municipal Fieldman on agriculture related District of Sturgeon No. 90, you programs implemented by the will direct all assessment functions Agricultural Service Board, for all properties within the including: weed inspection, control Municipality. In addition, you will complaints, issuance of notices, maintain positive public relations supervision responsibilities, pest through an awareness of assessment control, soil erosion control, matters including conferring with warble control, and other related (•Bl duties. consultants and business executives regarding the assessment and tax implications of locating in the The successful candidate will have 1 Municipality. an Agricultural Diploma or Degree, an Alberta Pesticide Applicator's You must possess an AMAA designation License or the ability to obtain and have a minimum of ten years this within one year, and a valid experience in all aspects of driver's license. Good assessment services. communications and interpersonal skills are necessary, and a farm Salary: $31,438 to $46,780 per background would be an asset. annum (1990). Employee Benefit Package is Interested candidates are invited to available. Annual salary will range submit a resume, quoting Competition from $20,000 to $24,000 depending on "Chief Assessor" (and marked qualifications and experience. "Confidential"), no later than Applications will be received until October. 31, 1990. Friday, November 16, 1990. Please address applications to: The Municipal District of Sturgeon No. 90 Richard E. Berringer 9601 100 Street Morinville, Alberta Agricultural Fieldman M.D. of Willow Creek No. 26 TOG 1P0 Box 550 Claresholm, Alberta T0L 0T0 ptl -~v&- MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MUNICIPAL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF THE MUNICIPAL DISTRICT OF BRAZEAU NO. 77 p HELD AT THE M.D. ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, DRAYTON VALLEY, ON THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 1990 CALL TO ORDER Chairman, H. Rondeau, called the meeting to order at 9:03 a.m. PRESENT H. Rondeau, Chairman N. Norton, Member J. Starling, Member P J. Coombes, Member R. Tatro, Member J. Eriksson, Secretary R. Kelso, Recording Secretary p Also in attendance: D. Roberge, Planning & Development Officer W. Durham, Landowner C. Durham, Landowner S. Schmidt, Landowner A. Grieb, Landowner J. Grieb, Landowner K. Byram, Pembina Oil Separators T. Bruner, Pembina Oil Separators J. Beckett, Landowner L. Ross, Landowner Mr. Reid, Energy Resources Conservation Board ADOPTION OF AGENDA 51/90 Moved by J. Starling that the Municipal Planning Commission Agenda be adopted as presented. CARRIED. S. Schmidt introduced herself and asked the Municipal Planning Commission why the meeting was held on a workday. H. Rondeau replied by stating all Municipal Planning Commission meetings are held on workdays. S. Schmidt said only a quarter of the proper input will be given because of the scheduling of the meeting. DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS 90D-36 Pembina Oil Separators The Development Officer reviewed his report and recommendations for the Municipal Planning Commission. J. Coombes arrived at the meeting at 9:07 a.m. 52/90 Moved by R. Tatro that the Proposed Industrial Landfill Site, Pt. of NE 29- 48-7 W5M, Pembina Oil Separators, be tabled until such time as the following items have been addressed: 1. • Applicants apply to rezone the property to the Industrial/Commercial District. P9 2. The Municipal District of Brazeau No. 77 receives Alberta West Central Health Unit's comments. p} PS5 —7M-- MUNICIPAL PLANNING COMMISSION -2- SEPTEMBER 13, 1990 3. Municipal District of Brazeau No. 77 receives Alberta Environment's comments. CARRIED. J. Eriksson indicated that prior to further consideration by the Municipal Planning Commission, a rezoning by Council requiring a Public Hearing would be required. W. Durham, C. Durham, S. Schmidt, A. Grieb. J. Grieb, K. Byram, T. Bruner, J. Beckett, L. Ross, Mr. Reid, all left the meeting at 9:12 a.m. ADOPTION OF MINUTES 53/90 Moved by N. Norton that the minutes of the August 9, 1990 Municipal Planning Commission be adopted as presented. CARRIED. DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS 89D-078 Theodore Chapin The Development Officer reviewed his report and recommendations for the Municipal Planning Commission. J. Coombes was concerned that the permit had to be renewed yearly because of the expense incurred by the development of the golf course. D. Roberge commented that when the development is fully completed, the issue regarding yearly renewal of the development permit will then be reviewed. 54/90 Moved by J. Starling that Request for Development Permit Renewal, Proposed Golf Course and Country Club, Pt. of SW 12-48- 4 W5M, Theodore Chapin, be approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Renewal be for one (1) year and further renewals shall be at the discretion of the Municipal Planning Commission. 2. Conditions of original approval C^ remain in effect. CARRIED. 90D-37 Patricia Smestad The Development Officer reviewed his report and recommendations for the Municipal Planning Commission. D. Roberge mentioned that probate has taken place recently and the Titles should be in place by September 17, 1990. J. Coombes commented that Mrs. Smestad's residence is very attractive and a compliment to the Hamlet of Buck Creek. 1 --75— MUNICIPAL PLANNING COMMISSION -3- SEPTEMBER 13, 1990 ^ 55/90 Moved by J. Coombes that the proposed 52' x 28' garage, lots 12 & 11, Block 5, Plan L 6043 HW, Buck Creek, Patricia Smestad, be approved subject to the following s| conditions: 1. Applicant consolidate lots 13, 12, & 11 under one Certificate of Title. P 2. a) Minimum front yard setback shall be 7.5m (25 feet). b) Minimum sideyard setback shall p be 3.05m (10 feet). c) Minimum rear yard setback shall be 7.5m (25 feet). n CARRIED. L 90D-07 Edward Simon _ The Development Officer reviewed his report for the Municipal Planning Commission. D. Roberge stated the Stop Work Order has been extended for 60 days making the deadline October 31, 1990. ^ 56/90 Moved by N. Norton that the Stop Work Order, Pt. of SW 28-49-7 W5M, Mr. Edward Simon, be extended for 60 days, making the deadline October 31, 1990. PJ CARRIED. Verne Jacob Verne Jacob p The Development Officer reviewed his report for the Municipal Planning Commission. Discussion arose I regarding the number of trucks seen on his property at one given time: Alberta Transportation's permit __ had been revoked until a Development Permit is f issued. 57/90 Moved by J. Starling that Alberta Transportation and Utilities Development p Permit No. 1476/69/90, Proposed 50' x 70' Shop and Storage of Two Logging Trucks, l N 1/2 of NE 3-49-7 W5M, Verne Jacob, be received for information. m CARRIED. Mrs. Dahl Alberta Planning Board Order No. 277-M-90/91 p The Development Officer reviewed the Alberta Planning Board Order No. 277-M-90/91 regarding Mrs. [ Martha Dahl for the Municipal Planning Commission. Roy Brydges Alberta Planning Board Order No. 309-M-90/91 I The Development Officer reviewed the Alberta ^ Planning Board Order No. 309-M-90/91 regarding Mr. Roy Brydges for the Municipal Planning Commission. i^ N. Norton questioned what exactly the Board Order's meant. D. Roberge stated they are waivers to Section 78 of the Planning Act which then allows two residences on a parcel less than 80 acres. I" f®$ -lb- MUNICIPAL PLANNING COMMISSION -4- SEPTEMBER 13, 1990 58/90 Moved by N. Norton that the following be accepted for information: a) Alberta Planning Board Order No. 277- M-90/91 dated August 17, 1990 regarding Mrs. Martha Dahl. b) Alberta Planning Board Order No. 309- M-90/91 dated August 24, 1990 regarding Mr. Roy Brydges. CARRIED. fK ADJOURNMENT 59/90 Moved by J. Starling that the regular Municipal Planning Commission dated September 13, 1990 adjourn at 9:36 a.m. -2L CHAPRM>N (^1 1 1 1 ALBERTA ASSOCIATION ~~^ of MUNICIPAL DISTRICTS & COUNTIES 4504-i°!street . ., S^SSSS^affi^.LZs^^^SS^* FAX 437-599 LARRY GOODHOPE - EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR H^r • 1 nr • I (ft 12 ill October 10, 1990 To: Municipal Districts and Counti GS rt A«rlcuUur' lL Hb6in\ °rW/rded to yo- °n behalf of the Minister nglnCU r S? Honourable Ernie Isley has suggested that you may Council As MrMr. Isley1 ^Tuwill be a**speakerPaymentat °fthe thefall"CroWconvention*«»*""thisat document may raise some questions. "version, cms Yours truly, Larry Goodhope Executive Director --78- f^] BOND ENTITLEMENT EXAMPLES BY REPRESENTATIVE TOWNS IN ALBERTA At present, the Crow Benefit is paid to the railways on the basis of not only tonnages shipped, but also distance to port. Table 1 provides estimates of per acre bond entitlements adjusted for soil productivity and distance to port. The examples provided in the table attempt to cover all soil zones and the varying distances to port encountered in Alberta. Table 2 provides estimated cash flows of the bond entitlement to its owner. Tl m *^LE x .* E<*«JPLLo BF ow*fb EwilTLLwtllTS PRODUCTIVITY DISTANCE CALCULATED ADJUSTMENT ADJUSTMENT ENTITLEMENT REGION AND FACTOR FACTOR ($ PER ACRE) TOWNS SOIL ZONE (A) (B) (A X B X $86/ACRE) SOUTH-EAST Foremost Brown 0.73 1.07 67 Manyberries Brown 0.73 1.08 68 Medicine Hat Brown 0.73 1.05 66 Acadia Valley Brown 0.73 1.15 73 Hanna Dark Brown 0.93 1.07 86 Oyen Brown 0.73 1.12 70 Consort Brown 0.80 1.10 76 Bindloss Brown 0.73 1.05 66 SOUTH-CENTRAL Milk River Dark Brown 0.93 1.05 84 Lethbridge Dark Brown 1.00 1.01 87 Vulcan Dark Brown 1.00 0.98 84 Gleichen Dark Brown 1.00 0.96 83 Trochu Thin Black 1.20 0.98 101 Drumheller Dark Brown 1.00 1.05 90 Brooks Brown 0.73 1.00 63 Vauxhall Brown 0.80 1.03 71 SOUTH-WEST Cardston Thin Black 1.13 1.07 104 Fort Macleod Dark Brown 1.00 1.00 86 Nanton Black 1.27 0.96 105 Okotoks Black 1.27 0.95 103 Olds Black 1.33 0.96 111 Airdrie Black 1.27 0.95 103 Pincher Creek Dark Brown 1.07 1.00 92 \ PRODUCTIVITY DISTANCE CALCULATED ADJUSTMENT ADJUSTMENT ENTITLEMENT REGION AND FACTOR FACTOR ($ PER ACRE) TOWNS SOIL ZONE (A) (B) (A X B X $86/ACRE) EAST-CENTRAL Stettler Thin Black 1.13 1.00 97 Camrose Black 1.27 0.96 105 Lamont Black 1.27 0.95 103 Vegreville Black 1.27 0.98 107 Vermilion Black 1.13 1.01 99 Wainwright Black 1.13 1.01 99 Provost Dark Brown 0.93 1.13 91 Viking Black 1.27 0.98 107 Coronation Dark Brown 0.93 1.08 87 WEST-CENTRAL Redwater Black 1.27 0.95 103 Innisfail Black 1.33 0.98 112 Red Deer Black 1.33 1.00 114 Wetaskiwin Black 1.27 1.03 112 Rimbey Black 1.13 1.03 101 Stony Plain Dark Grey 1.20 0.91 94 Bon Accord Black 1.27 0.95 103 Ponoka Black 1.27 1.01 111 NORTH-CENTRAL Elk Point Black 1.20 1.03 106 St. Paul Black 1.13 1.01 99 Bonnyvilie Dark Grey Luvisol 1.00 1.03 89 Smoky Lake Dark Grey 1.07 0.98 90 Westlock Dark Grey 1.13 0.96 94 Mayerthorpe Dark Grey 0.93 0.98 79 Barrhead Dark Grey 1.13 0.96 94 Athabasca Dark Grey 0.93 1.00 80 J.J r=^g *I 1 H PRODUCTIVITY DISTANCE CALCULATED ADJUSTMENT ADJUSTMENT ENTITLEMENT REGION AND FACTOR FACTOR ($ PER ACRE) TOWNS SOIL ZONE (A) (B) (A X B X $86/ACRE) NORTH McLennan Grey 0.80 1.05 72 Grande Prairie Black 1.07 0.95 87 Spirit River Black 1.07 1.00 92 Peace River Grey 0.80 1.08 75 Beaverlodge Dark Grey 0.93 0.98 79 Manning Black 1.00 1.13 98 High Level Grey 0.80 1.22 84 Fairview Grey 0.80 1.12 77 1. Bond entitlements for land classified as arable irrigation land can be estimated bv applying a factor of 1.48 to the acres of land classified as arable acres and then applying the productivity adjustment factor and the distance adjustment factor to arrive at the calculated entitlement. 2. The productivity adjustment factor has been calculated by dividing the estimated productivity rating for the area (e.g., Medicine Hat at 55) by the assumed weighted ar*na?? for the CWB designated area (75) to give the productivity adjustment factor ox U. / .3. 3. The average entitlement per acre is estimated to be $86 per acre. I I TABLE 2: CASH FLOW OF BOND ENTITLEMENT CASH FLOW OF ENTITLEMENT IF HELD I TO REDEMPTION £° so (DOLLARS) \ FACE VALUE OF BOND IF ESTIMATED DAY 1 HELD TO TRADED VALUE ON SUMMATION REDEMPTION REGION AND A RECOGNIZED YEARS YEARS YEARS OF CASH AFTER YEAR TOWNS EXCHANGE4* 1 THRU 5 6 THRU 10 11 THRU 15 FLOW 15 SOUTH-EAST Foremost 63,865 7,933 6,521 3,899 91,764 67,226 Manyberries 64,885 8,059 6,625 3,961 93,229 68,300 Medicine Hat 62,845 7,806 6,417 3,837 90,299 66,153 Acadia Valley 68,964 8,566 7,042 4,210 99,090 72,594 Hanna 81,283 10,096 8,299 4,963 116,791 85,561 Oyen 66,924 8,313 6,833 4,086 96,160 70,447 Consort 71,896 8,930 7,341 4,389 103,303 75,680 Bindloss 62,845 7,806 6,417 3,837 90,299 66,153 SOUTH-CENTRAL Milk River 79,985 9,935 8,167 4,883 114,926 84,195 Lethbridge 82,917 10,299 8,466 5,062 119,138 87,281 Vulcan 80,136 9,954 8,182 4,892 115,142 84,353 Gleichen 78,745 9,781 8,040 4,808 113,144 82,889 Trochu 96,163 11,944 9,819 5,871 138,171 101,224 Drumheller 85,698 10,645 8,750 5,232 123,135 90,209 Brooks 59,786 7,426 6,104 3,650 85,903 62,932 Vauxhall 67,446 8,377 6,887 4,118 96,909 70,996 J. I ,J „J .•,1 •--•^» k. ii !• "3 J r^j I j n 1 1 prmm% ^1 CASH FLOW OF ENTITLEMENT IF HELD TO REDEMPTION (DOLLARS) FACE VALUE OF BOND IF ESTIMATED DAY 1 HELD TO TRADED VALUE ON SUMMATION REDEMPTION REGION AND A RECOGNIZED YEARS YEARS YEARS OF CASH AFTER YEAR TOWNS EXCHANGE4* 1 THRU 5 6 THRU 10 11 THRU 15 FLOW 15 SOUTH-WEST Cardston 98,701 12,260 10,078 6,026 141,817 103,895 Fort Macleod 81,526 10,126 8,324 4,977 117,140 85,817 Nanton 99,744 12,389 10,184 6,090 143,316 104,993 Okotoks 97,982 12,170 10,004 5,982 140,785 103,139 Olds 104,993 13,041 10,720 6,410 150,859 110,519 Airdrie 97,982 12,170 10,004 5,982 140,785 103,139 Pincher Creek 86,961 10,802 8,879 5,309 124,950 91,538 EAST-CENTRAL Stettler 92,396 11,477 9,434 5,641 132,759 97,259 Camrose 99,744 12,389 10,184 6,090 143,316 104,993 Lamont 97,982 12,170 10,004 5,982 140,785 103,139 Vegreville 101,505 12,608 10,364 6,197 145,847 106,847 Vermilion 93,972 11,672 9,595 5,737 135,023 98,918 Wainwright 93,972 11,672 9,595 5,737 135,023 98,918 Provost 86,475 10,741 8,830 5,279 124,250 91,026 Viking 101,505 12,608 10,364 6,197 145,847 106,847 Coronation 82,581 10,257 8,432 5,042 118,655 86,927 WEST-CENTRAL Redwater 97,982 12,170 10,004 5,982 140,785 103,139 Innisfail 106,847 13,272 10,910 6,523 153,523 112,471 Red Deer 108,702 13,502 11,099 6,637 156,187 114,423 Wetaskiwin 106,789 13,264 10,904 6,520 153,440 112,410 Rimbey 95,548 11,868 9,756 5,833 137,288 100,577 I Stony Plain 89,488 11,115 9,137 5,463 128,580 94,197 00 Bon Accord 97,982 12,170 10,004 5,982 140,785 103,139 Ponoka 105,028 13,046 10,724 6,412 150,909 110,556 CASH FLOW OF ENTITLEMENT IF HELD I TO REDEMPTION1 CD (DOLLARS) x: FACE VALUE OF BOND IF ESTIMATED DAY 1 HELD TO TRADED VALUE ON SUMMATION REDEMPTION REGION AND A RECOGNIZED YEARS YEARS YEARS OF CASH AFTER YEAR TOWNS . EXCHANGE4* 1 THRU 5 6 THRU 10 11 THRU 15 FLOW 15 NORTH-CENTRAL Elk Point 101,169 12,566 10,330 6,177 145,364 106,494 St. Paul 93,972 11,672 9,595 5,737 135,023 98,918 Bonnyville 84,307 10,472 8,608 5,147 121,136 88,745 Smoky Lake 85,478 10,617 8,728 5,219 122,818 89,977 Westlock 89,244 11,085 9,112 5,449 128,230 93,941 Mayerthorpe 74,793 9,290 7,637 4,566 107,466 78,730 Barrhead 89,244 11,085 9,112 5,449 128,230 93,941 Athabasca 76,091 9,451 7,769 4,646 109,331 80,096 NORTH McLennan 68,558 8,516 7,000 4,186 98,508 72,167 Grande Prairie 82,511 10,249 8,425 5,038 118,556 86,854 Spirit River 86,961 10,802 8,879 5,309 124,950 91,538 Peace River 70,783 8,792 7,227 4,322 101,705 74,509 Beaverlodge 74,793 9,290 7,637 4,566 107,466 78,730 Manning 92,651 11,508 9,460 5,657 133,125 97,528 High Level 79,684 9,898 8,136 4,865 114,493 83,877 Fairview 73,009 9,068 7,455 4,457 104,902 76,851 1 Total entitlement and cash flow based on a 1,000 acre grain farm. 2 The estimated securities exchange trading value was based on the August 7, 1990, value of Federal Government bonds with similar yields and maturity dates. -£S — Figure 1 r [Pi pi pi p Legend pi I = South - East It» - South - Central I|I= South - West IV = East - Central Vp = West - Central V|i = North - Central Vil= North ••»••>>•*•' $ -8b- Minister of State (JfcZyw Ministre d'Etat Sj$3 Youth ' Award QMbntian ofmerit The Government Le Gouvernement of Canada du Canada proudly est fier de rendre salutes hommage a Municipal (District of (Brazeau #77 in grateful recognition en reconnaissance de ofyour contribution sa contribution a la to student creation d'emplois d'ete summer employment pour etudiantes et etudiants in Canada au Canada sy^^s Q. The Honourable Marcel Danis, Minister of State for Youth/ L'honorable Marcel Danis, ministre d'Etat a la Jeunesse loe. Ckrf(. MR* yetCozvfiead Member of Parliament/Depute September, 1990 Date I'90 Canada V;; r '• if! COUNCIL MEETING ADDENDUM 90 10 18 (October 18, 1990) V 1B| 151 pi Page Nos. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING ADDENDUM 90 10 18 87 - 97 6(b) Proposed Subdivision 90/91 YH085-41 - NW 20-50-7 W5M r - Olga Mulyk Report and Recommendation attached. 1$. Approval of Accounts 98 - 107 Listing attached. 20. Request for Training - Leadhand of Construction - Construction Costing and the Industrial Risk Analysis and Management Courses 108 - 110 Report and Recommendation attached. 21. Brazeau Foundation 111 - 112 Letter from the Honourable Ray Speaker, Minister of Municipal Affairs, dated 90 10 03 attached. 22. By-Law No. 116-90: To Proceed with a Transportation Study 113 - 115 By-Law and agreement attached. «*> 23. Correspondence/Items for Information 116 - 117 (a) Notice of Meeting to be held on 90 10 29 from the Edmonton Association of Municipal Districts and Counties received on 90 10 15. 118 (b) Board Highlights from the Twin Rivers School r Division No. 65 dated 90 10 12. 119 - 130 (c) News Release from the Government of Alberta dated 90 10 11 regarding "GST Legal Challenge". r IP -81- DEVELOPMENT OFFICERS REPORT TO COUNCIL REPORT NO. 94-90 SUBJECT: Proposed Subdivision 90/91 YH085-41 NW 20-50-7 W5M MULYK, Olga RECOMMENDATION: Approval be granted for the subdivision of proposed lot 1, subject to the following conditions: 1. Taxes being paid. 2. The owner/developer enter into a Development Agreement with the M.D. of Brazeau. 3. Municipal Reserves be deferred to the balance of the quarter section. 4. The owner/developer correct the encroachment of buildings on NE 20-50-7 W5M by: a) Relocating the encroaching buildings to the interior of proposed lot 1, maintaining the required setbacks as outlined in the current Land Use By law; OR b) Subdividing the encroached land from NE 20-50-7 W5M and consolidate it with proposed lot 1 in such a manner as to 1) prevent the subdivision of lot 1 without the approval of the subdivision approving authority, and 2) have all the buildings included within one titled area; OR c) Entering into an agreement with the owner of NE 20-50-7 W5M which allows for the building to continue to encroach upon NE 20-50-7 W5M, and which can be registered against the title. -88- REPORT NO. 94-90 (CONTINUED) REPORT: Further to the Development Officers report at Council dated 90 10 11, the lands in question falls within the Agriculture Two District (not better agricultural land) of the Draft Land Use r3 (9fo m- October 15r 1990 _,, „ File: 90/91YH085-41 P Reeve & Council li Municipal District of Brazeau P.O. Box 77 P» Drayton Valley, Alberta f TOE OMO p Dear Reeve & Council: Subject: Proposed Subdivision «, rMid^ti.residential «2«!?parcel "•''was lnpreviouslyS1?e* A 4.0subdividedhectare, from(10 acre)*h4=, L Planningquarter sectionCommissionby thefileapplicant# 7|-pl-?5»?in 1971' 'Rontonim.!.* »roRegional• hif f Caveatagainst Sfor quarter"eect!o».mUaiCipalis «•-,.»«« PL-158).rMerveA Deferredi8 registeredReserve The quarter section is hish in th* *»*•.*.**—«. j 'pH mostlydownwardclearedto thewithwest,somesouthwesttreed areasanfsoS?h»2-mva?he^uar?erPi«~J garter is spruce. The Canada i,*** t-ZIZZ areas' mostly of poplar and tfHfba. Si-,T«hClassH%f»0? 3iS• uSl^i0.??Clasa 29c0*, *****and ?h*13% *uartQrClass 49d5it.action With such a CLI rating this quarter «™,?j considered as better agricultural iL*aectlon.would**r<-7** not\ beI' the adopted Yellownead RegionaJ ^n^or^thl vL^*? District of Brazeau draft General Muni c^a^P Ian? MU*1Cipal The area around this quarter .<,-(-4« j_ * .. „ agricultural activities. The quarter L. .devo?f?. t0 mostly as pasture. Alberta Environment report* «Jff1Ji"d SJt2°:Stl«? Northern'utuit^ f&ER Qr°"ia° the ^^^^^^ a«oc^tedUPI^^^^g8^%everaro% t^tZli bTV" torfU. theACCesSdevelopedtO thisnorthernproposedeSst^es?lot ia MunichfiSlS^S?via An «,.j^^. uf^S^,8*^^^1^,- -|^f»«- l?«ted upon af . *w.the applicant.applicantwwcvw, according(Count^of(County oftoParklandpL^/^i8*?11a 1983 subdivi*-tr%«meT^s!!!"*??ffl~n—17icati°»^^J ** IS S/S'd -WWOD 'NtTId '93* QtGHMOTQA 9*:frT 06, ST 130 •qo— i west municipal District road to the north. ~\ The quarter section is ^.v.*.*^**.. ^ ' Agricultural/Mixed "anS Use District inder tZ??**? aa Parkland Land Use Bylaw. The nur™=f J ?!J ^he Countv of T permit farming and agricultural a!tL?^!hiS dlst?ict *• to 1 the production of clopl, Uvestock d«?rWa«8°Sia5ed with pasture land. withiS 'the Agricuitural/MixeddU,C!ii ,7* «* permittedDistrict use,a single(Sectionfamily31(4dwelling]| w^,,",,,«?*• flowed?, La*?dasUsea J Parkland Land Use BylaS states thills 2»wS? *** C°Unty of in this District, for land* ««* V^*1?131011 o£ land 1 agriculturalrsi«l Thli= land??. shallsnaij. »ebe Sat ?>,«"5?the discretion4e!jnedof theas Countvbe"<« [Sic]. There is no specified density regulation reauiat?^ the number of parcels oar ,*,.=..«.„_ £e9U"tlon regulating «, Agricultural/Mixeo^and Use SisSict S8Cti°n "lthin the 1 residential subdivision? section i7«i * !• multl-P«-«l ni»« «* ... q B hat the application be registered by Ic? L Sil^BSfiUS?11 to Section 85 oe the "«d miS refusal" i^iS ar1oraetr0n ^""^SX'SJ*1' W thaa * 1 subdivision' is not allowed as SjhS ! ^Iti-parcel STSE0"?ra«ui« *w 8li?WT -!«*^S2f°r a sub<»ivisionAgrilul^a^Mix^a'nrof this type, it woul*Usl 1 redesignatedrldesianatel to *h»°£the CountryPa"DResidential°? the While all of the above deals with the application of the noexistingdoubt landauapAuseo«p regulationsn,i«. «-_--,»,*. tola this proposal,proposal council isi« « *™i?2?mapplicationJ! of«2 the4.u0Urpoliciesrffent ^suasionsof the proposedconcerningGeneralthe * Municipal Plan and the regulations of the propped L«S 55 Bylaw to situations of this sort. p p ljana uae « MunicipalUnder the PlanMunicipalthis quarterDistrictsectionof Brazeau'swoSlI noTbeproposedconsideredGeneral - as better agricultural land, (Policy 3.2). As such? under thisMU±r?^this quarter Distr*ctsection°f wouldBrazeau's be proposeddesianatedLand Use'By?awfi»r»^«*. ♦.*! J JE1^"^Two District T"°is to°istei^-provide for»•usesPurposrS^thewhich are appropriateAflrfSStu^Jin 1 a rural environment on lands which have limited agricultural da£a£^ty;« ^ithi2 the ProP°86 Sz-E'd "WWOD •NtTU '938 (KamOTQA Zf:« 0S, St 100 ] 41 — 2* S^Sti0!!^ %r4^c1arerTire8eres^?oted r maximum of^^relid^tial lotl P^ t0 * As with the County of Parkland Land Use Bvlaw the «=m» f »ulti-parcel residential subdivision argument holds true as that under the proposed Land Use Bylaw? Section aiu? «? liLJ£°POS? Byiaw states that no subdfviUon shall be ffc JiifS^M^?*residential usen° whered«V6l0p?entit would**tmitresulti88Ua«iin for a ~-country t country residential lots in one quarter section^*v,t*ZSn£.« Municipal District has first reclassified luch lo?s " thet? f appropriate Country Residential District. As above i? thf I untilapplicationthe landis viewedis redesignated.in this way than a rerusalrefusal is in orderL2£ 1' ^"t*^^1*8 land in 1uasti°n is not better agricultural %**£ ^iowrer=oneddtio„PrVal °f the •»"«««. -b^J £ That only lot 1 be approved. m 2? That any outstanding property taxes be paid. f * toTLha^rLment^th^^o1^8?-< Municipal•enterDistrictinto adevelopmentof Brazeau 1 to the satisfaction$ of the Municipal District. 4. That cash-in-lieu of municipal reserve owning be paid for the parcel being created. 5' 2?.!*, Deferred Reserve Caveat No. 1915272 be discharged and that a new Deferred Reserve Caveat arearr?rSthrla??inStarea for the remaining municipalth? *alancereserve<* thaowing.SEE 6. ofl**ubuildingsJ?;.owne'/<»*veloperon NE 20 50 7correctW5th by:the encroacnmentencroachment a) interi^f^ encroach^g buildings to the J^f'°J °^Kpr?posed lot *< maintaining the ll^llt Bylawf*" °UtUned in the —t or b) 7Uw1thid«nB the f««oached land from NE 20 SO 1 in\*at consolldatia9 it with proposed lot 1 ^ eu?h a manner as to A) prevent the subdivision of lot 1 without the approval of h„™Ubd^1Si0n vafPrcvi^ authority, and B) tiS-d area?* bUildin9s i^ded within one or NEt620n3sont?NE 20 50 7 anwstha«5ae»antwhich withallowsthe ownerfor theof S/fr'd 'WWOD •NWTd "93a OtOmOTQ", 2fr:frT 06. ST 130 -qa Soil7iawSfh0 con*inue.to encroach upon NE 20 against30 7 W5thfthe title.and which can be registeredreaistered -j« I Condition # l has been included to keen +** *~*~~ i * 1 Conditions # 2 through # 5 are standard conditions *«,. almost any subdivision application. *naara eo»*"iona for Condition # 6 has been included to address fh« «^*o« « co»dit^aeh,nent,05 **• *»"«*»«» oStoaddSe2?♦•« 50% VstE°m-£l someconditionflexibilityis wordedin resoldin such athTencroachaent.wav as ^4,,^\u^ applicaat, . Ane If you have any questions on these comments or reauire noTne1i^ra1k"0n °B thi8 «Wlrt'1- P"^ PlETS Sincerely, Gary Buchanan Athabasca Area Planner ^^ r^v S/S"d 'WWOD "NbTTd '93a OtQHMOTQA 8fr:frT 06* ST 130 ' -q3- RETURN COMPLETED APPLICATION FORMS. TO: YELLOWHEAD REGIONAL PLANNING, COMMISSION jit^ Box 249, Onoway, Alberta - r'J ** TOE1VO Ph. 967-2249 Ml' i | j File No.;DV90134 SCHEDULE t FORM A V v*. >4=r--i FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION APPROVAL DATE of receipt of FILE No. Form A as completed GJ By plan ofsubdivision I [J By othor instrument 9o.m I ijH Q&-VI Tick whichever applies Fees Submitted: -f^l THIS FORM IS TO BE COMPLETED IN FULL WHEREVER APPLICABLE BY THE REGISTERED OWNER OF THE LAND THE SUBJECT OF THE APPLICATION OR BY AN AUTHORIZED PERSON ACTING ON HIS BEHALF. 1. Name of registered owner of land to be subdivided Address and phone no. .fllaAJHu.lxk JQr:iiy.tQa..yal.ljey.tAtilB.rta.,....TD.E...QKO...., Name in bloc* cipiiitt . ph.sa? ???? 2. Authorized person acting on behalf of registered owner Address and phono no. nn ca> , * 4*l c .4-u a . c c/° J.K.Smith &Associates IU.V.542 5252 .d-KAi£b..SmithjAJL^=~ eox-egz^-^raytion-VatlByvAlberta-TTjfOMO:- 'P> 3. LEGAL DESCRIPTION ANO AREA OF LAND TO BE SUBDIVIDED XXuVpart of the N-W- V* sec. 20 twp 50 range 7. west of 5.tfl meridia- Being Htr/parts ofXoa. jwucx jRttBxmxNNM C.O.T. No. ..138.t.Gs231.. Area of the above parcel of land tobe subdivided 8-vlQHa-v {-lO-fUZ) acic: 4. LOCATION OF LAND TO BE SUBDIVIDED a. The land is situated in the municipality of M.0L...af..^irazeaU..No....77. b. Is the land situtatod immediately adjacent to the municipal boundary? Yes No .. x If "yes", the adjoining municipality is c. Is tho land situated within O.S miles of the right-of-way of a Highway?Yes ... x No If"yes", the Highway is No.' ....22 ino SecondaryRoad is No d. Is the land situated withinO.S miles of a river, stream, watercourse, lake or other permanent body of water, or a canal or drainage ditch? Yes No ....« If "yes", stale its name - r 5. EXISTING AND PROPOSED USE OF LANO TO BE SUBDIVIDED Describe: a. Existing useof the land Agr.lG.ttl.t.Ur.a.1 b. Proposed use of the land (Pit ass coaplsto raverts) AflP-1-GtflttlFd) c. The designated use of the land as classified under a land use bylaw or a zoning bylaw or a land use classification guide where applicable ...Agricultural ; 6. PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF LAND TO BE SUBDIVIDED a. Oescribe the nature of the topography of the land (flat, rolling, steep, mixedl ...The- land-is- reasonably •flat»bu ?.lffj».?...t.B!«ar.?!...l;hft..]SiQMi;h«B5.i;Ji b. Describe the nature of the vegetation and water on tho land (brush, shrubs, tree stands, woodlots. etc. • sloughs, crueks. etc.) .There...is..iio. waten..on..-tha...Und..-Svera-1-snal-l bl*iffs-of-trees-in-the--quarter. #^ c. Describe the kind of soil on the land (sandy, loam, clay, etc.) Mostly-clay 7. EXISTING BUILDINGS ON THE LAND PROPOSED TO BE SUBDIVIDED Describe any buildings, historical or otherwise, and any structures on the land and whether they are to be demolished or rnovod lli&..owne^.,.s..r4sidence»-afKUfom*-bu41dir^s-"^ 8. REGISTERED OWNER OR PERSON ACTING ON HIS BEHALF I .J,JKe.1.tb...Smith.JLl.S „ hereby certifythat I iFull mm hi block feuxtMtl aftXWWfe%tt*tt»«»K*>MK — information given nn this form isfull and complete and is. to the am authorized to act on liehall of the registered owner " best of myknowledge, a true statement ofthe facts relating to hisapplication f^T^ubdiyiso/i approval c/o J.K.Smith & Associates Ltd., Address .Box...6S29tyDray.ton...VA.U&y<.T0C--0M&v (Signed) Phone No &42..5252 On* August- -31 yl99GV ^H^ over- FURTHER INFORMATION MAY Bt PHOVIOEO BY APPLICANT ON THE REVERSE OF THIS FORM -qq SECTIONi 5(b) ro 3E CONPLErEO 3Y THE tPPlECA»T/LANOOUNER 'ltasiouclln*In dtcailt.lsixactproposalun of thtFoltowing: (U The pareil to bt emttd: Both.parcels,.to.be.used,for.a.re6.1 (2) Tht nulndir of t.i< titles (Hot*: Th« prooottd usat aust bi onat shown In tits agnlclpal Land Uit 3y-la«). The.remqinde&.of.the.quarter..is..to.be.sold.as.pasture..• OECrSlOfltYOUU 4PPLICATI0HTO SU301710ETHE UHOS 0ESC3IBE0ON THE HEVEHic OF THIS FOAM HAS SEcNt D ippwed vErHour coHOirio.it C APPROVEDSUBJECTTO THEFOLLOWINGC0H01U0NS: . ....(Nottt.*llconditionsof thisapprovalaust bt nt prior •to coaatnetaant of construction or tndorstatnt of final rsglsttrablt docuaint). . Q 9EFUSE0FOB THE.FOLLOWINGSEASONS* i^ *^\ 1 1 YCLIOWHSAO KSOIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION YBLLOWHEAO REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION CONDITIONAL APPROVAL REFUSED OATS PIUS NO., THIS ENDORSEMENT IS VALID FOR IS MONTHS SUBSEQUENT TO TH8 ABOVE OATE.. 0AT8 PILE NO. OIRCCTOR Y.R.P.C. L 0IR6CT0R Y.R.P.C. -qs- r PLAN SHOWING ipr PROPOSED SUBDIVISION I H OF PART OF THE N.W.1/4 SEC.20 - TP.50 - R.7 - W.5 M. M.D. of BRAZEAU NO.77 NOTE : DISTANCES ARE IN METRES AND ARE SCALED. AND AREAS ARE APPROXIMATE. ROAD P LAN 8 4 2 2 3 9 6 231.25 134,90 LOT 2 1. 4.05 ha LOT 1 (10.01 Ac) 231.25 o 4.05 ha (10.01 Ac) O 134.80 •|ii N.W.1/4 SEC.20 - 50 - 7 - 5 •20- 5047-5 scMCt 1 j 9000 J.K.SMTTH & ASSOCIATES LTD. JOB NO t 4J1S ORKNN BY t N.S. DRAYTON VAltET — ALBERTA DV90134 (Kit 1 AU8.1990 -9b I 1 J ooo frrc\ l l 134.90 ifflfc 'Wi •Wt ! •L KEY PLAN SHOWING LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION OF NW.I/4-SEC20-50-7-5 MU. OF BRAZEAU N077 AUGUST 1990 SCALE •* I:1,000,000 JX. SMITH 8-ASSOCIATES LTD. DV90I34 -qa— J$fi eporting Date October 31, 1990 Prepared 07:13 90/10/17 Page 1 ompany 11-M.D,. OF BRAZEAU NO, 77 System AP--ACC0UNT3 PAYABLE A y IF" O il- ii CHEwum:— SUPPLIEK NET NO- B NO- NAME AMOUNT ATCHs 001587 DATE 90/10/15 TRAN CODE AP-CH Cheques VUTZ5I 001041 GIBBONS, CrbKKY 225-00 twfy TOTAL 225.00 * APPROVED BY rfmk «f% ^ft^ fl% Cw» Et?J _. Mug "^ "»"f Prepared 07s13 90/10/17 Page V* Company 11-M.D. OF BRAZEAU NO. 77 SUB-SYSTEM AP-ACCOUNTS PAYABLE ... ,- . ..~.W^--*j„,'^» ^\ y F* C ti BATCH NO. 001587 DATE 90/10/15 TRANSACTION CODE AP-CH Cheques 0011^.1 00J 041 1.1JMUNU, LfrKKY •«- r**>3 CUtQUE TOTAL 225.00 * .00 * 225.00 * L-K'ANl) TDTTni J2b.00 * ,00 K "225T0TJ-5T •=>'• •»*'*•*•*$( APPROVED BY rj„-5 .-^..-^^^ .—.. ..r.v». » *M ~ -'-V'* >--»—«-'•'«*>>-/» ~4^ —3TT •*V***J I -too— sporting Date October 31, 1990 Prepared 12:59 90/10/16 Page 1 ampany 11-M.D, OF BRAZEAU NO, 77 System AP-ACCOUNTS PAYABLE A y F" O £hi *=» en hjl *=?• Q._ ± -E* ir CHEQUE SUPPLIER NET NO. B NO. NAME AMOUNT 001252 #****«#*** CANCELLED ^<:jc^<^<)J<){oK»c** VICHs 001584 DATE 90/10/18 TKAN CODE AP-CH Cheques 001253 000017 ACKLANDS 444.07 —JT. 0012B4 00093? ACME SIGNS (ALBERTA) INC. S7 001255 000014 ALBERTA GOV., TELEPHONES 3,019, 33 001256 000510 AMERICAN EXPRESS CANADA 183, 20 0012SV 0001W—ANM-R&bN SANtt *. GKaVEL— i,416.T7(7 .1 001258 000036 ARROW WELDING & INDUSTRY 250. 68 001259 000382 B.R..S RENTAL SERVICE 275. 001260 000464 BILL ZINGLIr CONTRACTING 1,845.. 60 001261 000315 BRETON FORESTRY PRODUCTS 00 001262 000631 COMMUNITY PLANNING ASSOC. 33. 00 001263 001046 CONTINENTAL EARTH MOVERS 65,051. 1/ 001264 000862 CONTROL LAND SURVEYS LTD 1,965. 50 001265 000033 DERRICK SUPPLY LTD. 350. 76 001266 000115 DRAYTON BUILDING CENTRE 2,049. 30 001267 000119 DRAYTON VALLEY TRANSPORT 51. 29 001268 000446 DRAYTON'S PRIDE 196. 001269 000561 DRAYTON VALLEY AUTO PARTS 126. 13 001270 000281 ERIKSSON, JOHN 173. 60 001271 001042 FINANCIAL SERVICES 12. 00 001272 000222 FLASH HOT SHOT & DELIVERY 162. 50 001273 000081 FOUNTAIN TIRE 269. 50 001274 000448 FS1 CULVERT INC. 270. 00 001275 000212 GRAND & TOY OFFICE PROD, 93, 60 001276 000114 H & B PLUMBING 1,400. 00 001277 000023 H. GANSKE WELDING LTD. 30, 001278 000215 J..C-G. PROPANE: 343.9:* 001279 001047 INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS 15,420.41 001280 000478 INMAC 1, 63'/ „ 36 001281 000024 JADE OILFIELD MAINT,, CO.. 4,447.03 001282 000060 JUBILEE INS. AGENCIES LTD 32,474.00 001283 001043 KELSO, RHONDA 91.80 001284 000590 KJORLIEN, KNUT 2,000.00 001285 000360 LAIDLAW WASTE SYSTEMS 335.00 001286 00:1009 LATIMER CONSTRUCTION LTD. 1,552.65 001287 000573 LIND, WAYNE 247. 001288 000161 LION BUSINESS MACHINES 24.. 16 t$$» 001289 000141 LOOMIS COURIER SERVICE 54 001290 000061 MACK & MANN TRUCKING AND 637. 50 001291 000693 MARY'S ONE HOUR PHOTO 376. 35 001292 001044 MCCRACKEN, TENNIE 91. 80 001293 000852 MICRO SOFTWARE INC. 150. 00 APPR 001294 000001 MILLER-CROFT BUILDING 29. 49 001295 000050 MOTOROLA LTD.. 31. 00 001296 000230 NEWBERRY, FRANK 156. 75 001297 001045 OBERG, IRi:S 15. 00 001298 000025 OPTION MACHINE- & REPAIR 089. 09 001299 000095 PEMBINA POWERTRAIN 10.20 1 lorting Date October 31, 1990 Prepared 12s59 90/10/16 Page -l©| — onpany 11-M.D. OF BRAZEAU NO. 77 System AP-ACCOUNTS PAYABLE IS* iAi/• F" O D"n he? CHEQUE SUPPLIER NET NO. B NO. NAME AMOUNT CHs 001584 DATE 90/10/18 TRAN CODE AP-CH Cheques 001300 000728 PEMBINA OIL SEPARATORS 120.00 001301 000101 PROVINCIAL TREASURER 50.00 001302 000009 RECEIVER GENERAL OF CAN. 31,291.51 001303 000897 RED JET OILFIELD 452.00 001304 000637 RICHARD'S NOVUS 175.00 001305 000310 ROBERGE., DAVE 166.50 001306 000429 ROOS, JAMES 1,225.20 001307 000759 ROOS, KAY 1,135.45 Wi 001308 000927 SHELL CANADA PRODUCTS LTD a'„ X IJ * / A.. II A.. A- 001309 000196 SOFTWAREHOUSE (WEST) INC, 609.00 001310 000546 STEFURAS CONTRACTING 5,388.15 001311 000363 STOKES CAP ?.< REGALIA 295.. 05 001312 000052 T.H..E. CLEANERS 295.30 001313 000203 THE REPRESENTATIVE 20.. 00 001314 000042 THE WESTERN REVIEW 390.60 001315 000193 TI-RO TRUCKING LTD #KM 11 *••*<«/ • 00 1 001316 000799 TORCHINSKY ENGINEERING 18,535, 50 00131/ 000125 TOWNLINE SPECIALTIES 25. 64 001318 000037 TRANSALTA UTILITIES CORP. 2,248. 77 r~ 001319 000836 UNITED GRAIN GROWERS LTD 1,852. 53 001320 000171 WAJAX INDUSTRIES LTD. 3,914. 84 001321 000040 WELLHOUSE SUPPLY LTD. 109. 84 iV ! TOTAL 237.562. 86 * w> AHrHpVBD BY r r r IHH I ! 1HM Sep or ting Datt* October 31, 1990 Pr epared 12:58 90/10/16 Page 1 Conoany 11-M.D. OF BRAZEAU NO. 77 SUB-SYSTEM AP-•ACCOUNTS PAYABLE «=*/ §=> C h «e- c$ n..x <=» Fte-«3 d. s. - BATCH NO. 001584 DATE 90/10/18 TRANSACTION CODE AP-CH Cheques 001253 000017 ACKLANDS 90/10/18 000001 001583 42.68 .00 42.68 MIRRORS (M-10) 90/10/18 000002 001583 13.86 . 00 13.86 MIRRORS (M-15) 90/10/18 000003 001583 12.78 .00 12.78 HARD HAT HOLDER APPROVE BY 90/10/18 000004 001583 42.95 .00 42.95 HYDRAULIC JACK 90/10/18 000005 001583 130.00 .00 130.00 WIRE 90/10/18 000006 001583 31.01 .00 31.01 SHOVEL fQ^ 90/10/18 000007 001583 1.70.79 .00 170.79 SHOP SUPPLIES CHEQUE TOTAL 444.07 * .00 * 444.07 * 001254 000937 ACME SIGNS (ALBERTA) INC 90/10/18 002337 001578 75.57 .00 75.57 BRIDGE OUT SIGNS CHEQUE TOTAL 75.57 * .00 * 75.57 * 0000t4 ALBERTA GOV. TELEPHONES 90/10/18 001583 1,181.95 00 1,181.95 542-7/77 BILL TO OCT 5 90/10/18 000001 001570 255.23 00 255.23 AURORA BILL TO OCT 24-PSO 90/10/18 000002 001578 146.79 00 146.79 AURORA BILL TO OCT 24-ASB 90/10/18 000003 001578 1,103.55 00 1,103.55 AURORA BILL TO OCT 24-PW 90/10/18 000004 001578 331.81 00 331.81 EDM'T DIRECT TO OCT 24 CHEQUE TOTAL 3,019.33 * 00 * 3,019.33 * 000510 AMERCCAN EXPRESS CANADA 90/10/18 0015R3 J.83. 20 00 183.20 WORKING LUNCHES CHEQUE TOTAL 183.20 * 00 ft 183.20 * 00019/ ANDERSON HAND & GRAVEL 90/10/18 014660 001578 1,410.00 00 1,410.00 120 YRDS R.I.P RAP SP 90-33 CHEQUE TOTAL 1,410.00 * 00 * 1,410.00 * 000036 ARROW WELDING * INDUSTRY 90/10/18 222800 00J.S83 250.68 1*0" a$b.68—OXYKEN/ACEYYENE RENTAL CHEQUE TOTAL 250.68 * 00 * 250.68 * 000382 B.R.S RENTAL SERVICE 90/10/18 008950 0015/8 130.00 .00 130.00 RENTAL OF 2 RAMMERS 90/10/18 008965 001583 140.00 .00 140.00 RENTAL OF RAMMERS SP90-42 90/10/18 018950 001578 5.25 .00 5.25 MIXED GAS CHEQUE TOTAL «->•>«=; 25os * 00 ft 275. 2! * 000464 BILL 2INGI.E CONTRACTING 90/10/18 000002 001583 1.8 45.60 00 1.845.60 SEPTEMBER SFEPCNG CHEQUE TOTAL 1,845.60 * .00 * 1,845.60 * 000315 BRETON FORESIKY PRODUCTS 90/10/18 062910 001583 95.00 00 95.00 10 BUNDLES OF LATHE 90/10/18 162910 001583 30.00 .00 30.Ou—5 16" STAKES CHEQUE TOTAL 125.00 * .00 * 125.00 * 00063.1 COMMUNITY PLANNING ASSOC 90/10/1H 004474 001578 33.00 .00 33.00 SOIL TESTING AD CHEQUE TOTAL 33.00 * .00 * 33.00 * 00104/,' ('li'iHT'lt>ll-IIIAL l-ARTH MOVERS 90/10/18 001583 65,051.17 TUT5 65,051.17 rR srURIiWATIiR CONSTRUCT CHEQUE TOTAL 65,051.17 * .00 * 65,051.1.7 * • J .^•... -1 \j^-M K J s——J •u |M. .y L_ I, •••••••••••;§f x, ,v,-„„-,-i '->*.—J i^*^_J rv-^-J * - M \*^-~M f^ F Importing Datt- October 3.1, 1 Prepared 12:38 90/lo7l6 Page Cowpany 11-M.D. OF BRAZEAU NO. 77 SUB-SYSTEM AP-ACCOUNTS PAYABLE i 1 Ai / F" C Iti o cj i.a e Re cj ister PHEQUE SUPP. ORIGINAL REFERENCE DISC/PEN NET NO. B NO. NAME DATE REFER. BATCH AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUNT DESCRIPTION i i 3ATCH NO. 001584 DATE 90/10/18 TRANSACTION CODE AP-CI- Cheques ^0126* 000Bo2 CONTROL LAND SURVEYS LTD 90/10/18 001449 001583 1, 965.50 .00 1,965.50 SURVEY KEYSTONE CEMETARY CHEQUE TOTAL 1. 965.50 * .00 ft 1,965.50 ft DO1265 000033 DhRRICK SUPPLY LTD. 90/10/18 000001 001578 72.80- .00 72.80- ALTERNATOR & CORE (M-7) 90/10/18 000002 001578 20.61 .00 20.61 TRAILER PLUG (T-8) 90/10/18 000003 001578 176.78 .00 176.78 EQUIPMENT PARTS 001266 0001VJ DRAM ON BUILDtHU CENTRE 90/10/13 049332 001383 ,049.30 .00 2,049.30 54 ROLLS BARB WIRE CHEQUE TOTAL •3 ,049.30 * .00 ft 2,049.30 ft 00126/ 0001.19 DRAYTON VALLEY TRANSPORT 90/10/18 057209 001583 51.29 .00 51.29 COUPLERS CHEQUE TOTAL 51.29 * .00 ft 51.29 ft 001268 000446 DRAYTON'S PRCDE 90/10/18 00000i 0015/3 84.00 .00 84.00 TRUCK WASH (PW) 90/10/18 000002 001578 81.75 .00 81.75 TRUCK WASH (PSO) 90/10/18 000003 0015/8 31.00 .00 31.00 TRUCK WASH (ASB) CHEQUE TOTAL 196.75 * .00 ft 196.75 ft 001269 000561 DRAYTON VALLEY AUTO PART 90/10/18 005625 0015/8 126.13 .00 1.26.13 ROTATING LIGHT (T-2) CHEQUE TOTAL 126.13 ft .00 ft 126.13 ft 001270 000281. ERIKSSON, JOHN '" 90/10/18 00000 L 001503 J.02. 60 .00 1.02.60 MILEAGE -RED DEER CONFER. 90/10/10 000002 001583 71.00 .00 71.00 SUBSIST.-RED DEER CONFER. CHEQUE TOTAL 173.60 * .00 ft 1/3.60 * 001271 00304? f/iiahcjai services 90/10/18 T0023 001583 12.00 .00 12.00 eNViromentaL ANALYSIS' CHEQUE TOTAL 12.00 * .00 ft 12.00 * 0i)J?72 000222 FLASH HOT SHOT & DELIVER 90/10/18 000001 001578 72.55 .00 72.55 SIGN POSTS 90/10/18 000002 001578 89.95 .00 89.95 EQUIPMENT PARTS CHEQUE TOTAL 162.50 ft .00 ft 162.50 ft 001273 000081 FOUNTAIN TIRE 90/10/18 037496 001583 144.00 .00 1.44.00 MOUNT TIRES 001274 000-148 EST CULVERT INC. 90/10/18 010643 001583 2/0.00 .00 270.00 CULVERT BOLTS * CHEQUE TOTAL 270.00 ft 00 * 2/0.00 * .-,„,..,...,.. rr.Vi,n> . r(|Y r-i.|.. i nr pWMV <•>/) /1 o.' | « ,vr,\f,.\i OOWO 44. 1.0 0" 4 4.10 POST-IT PAHS Cepovting Date Uclober 31, 1990 Prepared 12:58 90/10/16 Page • Company 11-M.D. OF BRA7FAU NO. 77 SUB-SYSTEM AP-ACCOUNTS PAYABLE iA/F' O B-* «e- cj «_n «a- R:«9cj:i.-*5-'tr@v :heque supp. ORIGINAL REFERENCE DISC/PEN NET NO. B NO. NAME DATE REFER. BATCH AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUNT DESCRIPTION BATCH NO. 001584 DATE 90/10/18 TRANSACTION CODE AP-CH Cheques 90/10/18 624444 001583 49.30 00 4V. 50 HiCRb-cAsSEfYEs CHEQUE TOTAL 93.60 ft 00 ft 93.60 000114 H&B PLUMBINii 90/10/18 003969 001583 1,400.00 150— 1,400.00 QUARTERLY SERVICE COM*. CHEQUE TOTAL 1,400.00 ft 00 ft 1,400.00 ft 000023 H. GAHSKI£ WKLOCHG LTD. 90/10/18 041081 001578 30.35 00 30.35 SQUARE TUBING CHEQUE TOTAL 30.35 ft 00 ft 30.35 000215 t.C.G. PROPANE 90/10/18 000001 0015/8 151.86 00 151.86 SEPTEMBER PRUPANE (T-15) 90/10/18 000002 001578 192.07 00 192.07 SEPTEMBER PROPANE (T-16) CHEQUE TOTAL 343.93 * 00 ft 343.93 1 001279 001047 INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS 90/10/18 015496 001583 15,420.41 .00 15,420.41 SURVEY CYNTHIA/RR SEWER j CHEQUE TOTAL 15,420.41 ft .00 ft 15,420.41 ft i 001280 000478 90/10/1B OOOOOi 001578 580.00 .00 580.00 4-6 OUTLET PLUG-INS | tmM APP/?3?BY 90/10/18 000002 001578 1,057.36 .00 1,057.36 4 BOXES BLACK RIBBONS ' fV~.*i/£/ CHEQUE TOTAL 1,637.36 ft .00 ft 1,637.36 ft : i 001281 000024 JADE 01LEI! ELD MAINT. CO. 90/10/18 009165 001578 4,447.03 .00 4,447.03 CONTRACT WELDING - SEP 21 j CHEQUE TOTAL 4,447.03 * .00 ft 4,447.03 ft 001282 000060 JUBILEE TNS. AGENCIES LT 90/10/18 OOOOOi 001533 10,824.00 .00 10,824.00 GENERAL LIABILITY INSUR. 90/10/18 000002 001583 21,650.00 .00 21,650.00 PREPAID LIABILITY INSUR. CHEQUE TOTAL 32,474.00 ft .00 ft 32,474.00 ft 001983 001043 KELSO, RHONDA 90/10/1h OOOOOI 00J 583 82.80 . 00 82.80 MILEAGE ~ NUVEMWEK 2 90/10/18 000002 ooisen 9.00 .00 9.00 LUNCH - NOVEMBER 2 CHEQUE TOTAL 91.80 ft ..00 ft 91.80 ft 001284 000590 KJORLIEN, KNOT 90/10/18 001583 2,000.00 .. 00 2,000.00 GRAVEL LEASE AGREEMENT CHEQUE TOTAL 2,000.00 ft .00 ft 2,000.00 ft 001285 000360 I.AIDLAW WASTE SYSTEMS 90/10/18 OOOOOI 001578 290.00 .00 290.00 SEPT. LIFT CHARGE-BRETON 90/10/13 000002 001.578 45.00 .00 45.00 SEPT LIFT CHARGE-MODESTE CHEQUE TOTAL 335.00 * .00 * 335.00 * 001286 001009 LATIMER CONSTRUCTION LTD 90/10/18 026510 001583 1,552.65 .00 1,552.65 INSTALL CULVERT RC 89-51 CHEQUE TOTAL 1,552.65 * . 00 ft i,ysa.6S ft 001.287 000573 LIHP, WAYNE 90/10/18 OOOOOI 001.578 90.00 .00 90.00 M1LEAGE-AFMS CONFERENCE 90/10/18 000002 001578 157.55 .00 157.55 SUbsIsY-aI-'Hs CONFERENCE CHEQUE TOTAL 247.55 ft .00 ft 247.55 ft 0O128H 000161 1 ION UUSfHKSS MACHINES 90/10/18 CE314 7 601378 24.16 .00 24. 16 SEPT PHOTOCOPY CHARGES CHEQUE TOTAL 24.16 *<*. .oo ft 24.16 ft ' . i _^-j ^-,- j w-. i w.-i i _j , •• •••«» -» ii M ••*•»•— iiiy w-j—M '^—^—J& mm^_ •<*pi» t fngba i;e October .31, 13»90 Prepared 12:58 90/10/16 Page _____ Coup any 11-M.D. (II- BRA/EAU NO. 77 SUB-SYSTbM AP-ACCOUNTS PAYABLE i^/F" HJ:Bii >ra-.i_r_il o R:«E2-«3i3L'S"|L-e2-'i'~ GHUIUE 5TTPPT ORIGINAL REFERENCE DISC/PEN NET NO. 6 NO. NAME DATE REFER. BATCH AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUNT DESCRIPTION BATCH NO. 001584 DA1F 90/10/18 TRANSACTION CODE AP-CH Cheques 001 !H9 00O1.H LWUfilS CI.H.IR i;i-!r ^EK'VtCE 90/10/ LU 0015/8 35.54 -00 35.54 PARCEL DELIVERY (ADMIN) CHEQUE TOTAL 35.54 ft .00 ft 35.54 ft uvuivo oooo^i ,iuCK ,\ aAH'1 •'RHCKtNG aHD 90/10/18 005U99 OOiS'/fl 134.50 T- 184.So HAUL D7 CAT SP S>0-33— 90/10/18 013899 001578 260.50 .00 268.50 HAUL EQUIPMENT SP 90-40 90/10/13 023899 001578 184.50 .00 184.50 HAUL EQUIPMENT SP 90-42 """" ~~~ CHEUUE I'O'I'AL 63/.50 ft .00 ft 637.56 ft 000693 MARY'S ONE HOUR PHOTO 90/10/18 OOOOOI. 001583 128.80 00 128.30 FILM 90/10/18 000002 001583 186.10 .00 186.10 FILM PROCESSING 90/10/18 000003 001583 23.00 .00 23.00 FILM 90/10/18 000004 001583 38.45 .00 38.45 FILM PROCESSING CHEQUE TOTAL 376.35 ft .00 ft 376.35 ft 001044 MCCRACKEN, TENNIb 90/10/18 OOOOOI 001583 82. 80 .00 82.80 MILEAGE - OCTOBER 12 90/10/18 000002 001583 9.00 .00 9.00 LUNCH - OCTOBER 12 CHEQUE TOTAL 91.80 ft .00 91.80 ft 001293 0008:>2 MICRO SOFTWARE -NC. 90/10/18 001573 150.00 00 150.00 SEPT. COMPUTER SUPPORT CHEQUE TOTAL 150.00 ft 00 ft 150.00 ft 001294 OOOOOI HILLKK-CROI-T filj I.LIVIHG 90/10/10 004319" 00J.578 29.49 .. 00 2^. oooo;io noroROLA ltd. 90/10/18 /15/IS 001.5/0 31.00 00 31.00 RENTAL OF HAND RADIO CHEQUE TOTAL 31.00 ft 00 ft 31.00 ft "000230 NLWHhRRY, FRANK" Vo/10/18 OOOOOI 001578 "8777475 TOO «6.40 MILEAGE-AMIS CONFERENCE ._ 90/10/18 000002 001578 70.35 .00 70.35 SUBSIST-AFMS CONFERENCE APPROVED BY cheque total 156.75 ft .00 ft 156.75 ft 001297 001045 OMERG, IRIS 90/10/18 001583 15.00 .00 15.00 REFUND ON ATV SPRAYER • CHEQUE TOTAL 15.00 ft . 00 ft 1.5.00 * 001298 000025 0PV10N MACHJNfc i< REPAIR 90/10/18 014382 001578 4,676.00 .00 4,676.00 SEPT. CONTRACT WELDING 90/10/18 014451 0015/8 217.08 .00 217.08 REPAIR HYDRAULIC RAM 90/10/18 01.4482 001503 196.01 T- 196.01 REPAIR GRAVEL- BOX (T-ll) CHEQUE TOTAL 5,039.09 ft .00 ft 5,039.09 * Oooovl» PHII.U.N A PtltJt-R't RAlN 9 001300 000/28 Pc::'J-:JHA OIL SbPARATORS 90/10/18 032907 001583 120.00 . 00 120.00 WASH PORTABLE TANK CHEQUE TOTAL 120.00 ft -00 ft 120.00 * 9 •"H»{)1 01 Pl-:r»7 i l>:c;|.AL l RI-mSMRER '0/10/10 071313 00lb83 fjO-00 , o ;> 50.00 1990-91 RENT LOC 841030 CHEQUE TOTAL 50-00 * - oo * 50.00 ft T exporting Pate 0 etcher 31, .1990 Prepared 12:58 90/10/16 Page 5 '- i Connany 11-M.D. OF BRA7.EAU NO. 77 SUB -SYSTEM AP-ACCOUNTS PAYABLE I ^/F-" Ch & CJ«_l^ Fte-g ister t HEQUE SUPP. ORIGINAL REFERENCE DISC/PEN MET I NO. B NO. NAME DATE REFER. BATCH AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUNT DESCRIPTION lATCH NO. 001584 DATE 90/10/18 TRANSACTION CODE AP-CH Cheques o •01302 000009 RECblVER GtlHRAL 0T- CAM. 90/10/18 OOOOOI 001578 3,520.70 .00 3,520.70 C.P.P. PAYABLE 90/10/18 000002 001578 4,716.10 .00 4,716.10 U.I.C. PAYABLE 1 90/10/18 000003 001578 23,054.71 .00 23,054.71 INCOME TAX PAYABLE CHEHUE TOTAL 31,291.51 ft .00 ft 31,291.51 * •01303 000897 RE-D JFT OJLKlbLD 90/10/18 A3457 001583 452.00 .00 452.00 OPERATE JUMPING JACKS CHEQUE TO TAL 452.00 ft .00 * 452.00 * )O1304 000637 RICHARD'S HOVUS 90/10/18 A17-47 001578 175.00 .00 175.00 INSTALL WINDSHIELD >O1305 000310 ROBFRGF, DAVF 90/10/18 001583 166.50 .00 166.50 CONFERENCE SUBSISTENCE CHEQUE TOTAL 166.50 ft .00 ft 166.50 * )01306 000429 ROOS, JAMES 90/10/18 OOOOOI 001583 1,100.00 .00 1,100.00 OCTOBER CARETAKER-WWP ^90/10/18 000002 001583 97.20 -00 97.20 OCTBOER MILEAGE APPRQV)ED BYyo/10/18 000003 001583 28.00 .00 28.00 MISC. SUPPLIES CHEQUE TOTAL 1,225.20 ft .00 ft 1,225.20 ft llw )01307 000759 "0/10/18 OOOOOI 001583 1,100.00 .00 1,100.00 OCTOBER CARETAKER ; 90/10/18 000002 001583 35.45 .00 35.45 MISC. SUPPLIES CHEQUE TOTAL 1,135.45 ft .00 ft 1,135.45 ft )01308 000927 SHELL CANADA PRODUCTS LT 90/10/18 OOOOOI 001583 1,839.08 .00 1.039.08 SEPTEMBER GREASE & OIL 90/10/1.8 000002 001583 20,133.14 .00 20,133.14 SEPTEMBER FUEL CHEQUE TOTAL 21,972.22 ft .00 ft 21. 972.22 ft )01309 000196 SUFTUAREHOUSH (WEST) 1NC 90/10/18 905602 001.533 90.00 .00 90.00 BLACK RIBBON 90/10/18 905603 001533 519.00 .00 519.00 RAVEN PRINTER CHEQUE TOTAL 609.00 ft .. 00 ft 609.00 ft 301310 000546 STEFURAS CONTRACTING 90/10/18 043346 001578 3,780.80 -00 3,780.30 D8K h SCRAPER SP 90-29 90/10/18 143846 001578 1,607.35 .00 1,607.35 D8K & SCRAPER SP 90-42 CHEQUE TOTAL 5,388.15 ft .00 * 5,338.15 ft 301311 000363 STOKES CAP *, REGALIA 90/10/10 054409 001583 295.05 -00 295.05 REVERSIBLE RAINCOAT CHEQUE TOTAL 295.05 ft . 00 ft 295.05 ft 001312 000052 T.H.E. CI EANFRS 90/10/18 OOOOOI 001583 137.75 .00 137.75 AUGUST COVERALL CLEANING 90/10/18 000002 001533 115.55 .00 115.55 SEPT. COVER-ALL CLEANING 90/10/18 000003 001583 42.00 .00 42.00 UNIFORM ALTERATIONS (PSO) CHEQUE TOTAL 295.30 ft .00 ft 295.30 ft 001313 000203 THE REPRFSENTATIVF 90/10/18 001583 20.00 .00 20.00 1 YR SUBSCRIPTION CHEQUE TOTAL 20.00 ft -00 ft 20.00 ft 000042 THE WhSTFRN Rl VIFW 90/10/18 OOOOOI ooiso: •4-'<- 10 00 44.1.0 EMPLOYMENT AD •\r f: i nor, i "'*<: />•> f ,__-J w-„ J -^J „J n^-J , J _J _J v_J ...iir-i-Viiiify * rM w*-—Jsr ^.^i^v.i^ 3L Prepared 12:59 90/10/16 Page Ctmpany 11-M.D. OF BRAZEAU NO. /7 SUB-SYSTEM AP-ACCOUNTS PAYABLE "^ •*"* F" C lr* eg- CJ i_q. e» F:«2- cj dL is"te* v CHEUUE SOPP. ORIGINAL REFERENCE DISC/I'EN NET NO. B NO. NAMF DATE REFER. BATCH AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUNT DESCRIPTION BATCH NO. 001584 DATE 90/10/18 TRANSACTION CODE AP-CH Cheques 90/10/18 000003 0015S3 26.25 .00 26.25 SOIL SAMPLE AD 90/10/18 000004 001583 165.90 .00 165.90 ADMIN. ADS 90/10/18 000005 001583 100.80 .00 100.80 PARENTING WORKSHOP ADS CHEQUE lUlrtL 390.60 ft .00 * 390.60 * 000193 TI-RO TRUCKING LTD 90/10/18 OOOOOI 001583 164.00 .00 164.00 HAUL LOADER TO PIT yo/io/19 000002 ooimj 246.00 7W 246.0o HAUL EUUKpHENY SP 90-42 90/10/18 000003 001583 305.00 .00 305.00 HAUL EQUIPMENT SP 90-46 90/10/18 000004 001533 776.00 .00 776.00 HAUL EQUIPMENT SP 90-47 90/lO/lS 000005 001S8.V 246.00 TOO" 246.00 HAUL b7 CAT TO LODGEPfJLE 90/10/18 000006 001583 164.00 .00 164.00 HAUL LOADER TO DV YARD 90/10/18 001053 001578 205.00 .00 205.00 HAUL D7 CAT SP 90-33 yO/10/ifl 001O61 00l5>8 123.00 Too"— 123.00 HAUL 180 HOE SP 90-40 CHEQUE TOTAL 2,229.00 ft .00 * 2,229.00 ft 600/99 I'ORCHtNSKY ENGINEERING 90/10/18 E -4334 0013^3 L,702.95 -00 1,702.95 CONSTRUCTION Rl.i 90-^5 90/10/18 E-4335 001583 1,827.95 .00 1,327.95 CONSTRUCTION RC 89-51 90/10/18 E-4375 001583 8,172.60 -00 8,172.60 CONSTRUCTION RC 89-51 90/10/18 E-4376 001583 6,832.00 . 00 6,832.00 CONSTRUCTION RC 90-55 CHEQUE TOTAL 18,535.50 ft .00 ft 18,535.50 ft OoOlvl, TOUNLlNt. SPt.CJALryt'S 90/10/18 003643 OO1503 25.64 rou— 25.64—PLATE 5ET i, ENGRAVING CHEQUE TOTAL 25.64 ft 00 ft 25.64 ft 00003/ TKAHSALTA UIILJTIES CURP 90/10/18 OOOOOI 001583 2,164.33 . 00 2,164.33 STREET LjXHTS TO SEPT 30 90/10/18 000002 001583 61.18 .00 61.18 LODGE. TWN OFF.TO SEPT 23 90/10/18 000003 001533 23.26 • 00 23.26 LODGEPOLE SHOP TO SEPT 23 CHEQUE iUIAL 2,248.// ft - 00 ft 2,24H./'/ * 000836 UNITED GRAIN GROWERS LTD 90/10/18 OOOOOI 001583 1,576.05 .00 1,576.05 66 L OF BANVEL " Vo/iO^iS OO0O02 OoisOa 24'>.63— .00 247.68 20 L OE ROUNDUP 90/10/18 000003 001583 28.80 .00 28.80 4 L OF AGRAL 90 , CHEQUE TOTAL 1,852.53 ft .00 * 1,852.53 ft 000171 WAJAX INDUSTRIES LTD. 90/10/18 149761 001570 3,914.84 00 3,914.84 EQUIPMENT PARTS (M-6) CHEQUE TOTAL 3,914.84 ft 00 * 3,914.84 ft 000040 WELL HOUSE SUPPLY LTD. 90/10/18 047530 001583 43.85 00 43.85 0-RINGS 90/10/18 048336 001533 65.99 00 65.99 HOSE & FITTENGS (M-15) LULL!UI.. IU IAt. 109.84 - 00 T 109.84 GRAND TOTAL 237,562.86 ft 00 ft 237,562.86 ft APPROVED BY a -108— REPORT TO MUNICIPAL MANAGER FROH: Richard Tatro Director of Public Works 4- DATE: October 16, 1990 SUBJECT: Request for Training. REPORT NO: DPW-90-27 RECOMMENDATION That the Leadhand of Construction be authorized to attend the Construction Costing and the i Industrial Risk Analysis and Management Courses being offered by the University of r^ Alberta. REPORT: The Faculty of Extension at the University of Alberta Is holding 2 (two) courses dealing with the Construction Industry. It would be well worth while for our Leadhand of Construction to attend these courses. The costs are as follows: A) Construction Costing $225.00 f^ i B) Industrial Risk Analysis and Management $95.00 TOTAL $320.00 \cv Wellness is Good Business: Fall: 7720 - Oct. 15 & 16/90, 9:00a.m. - 4:30 p.m. $140 Hours: 13 Organization for the Workplace of the Nineties Fee: This workshop will examine several types of employee wellness programs and several methods of organizing ResolvingConstruction Disputes employee wellness strategies. Solutions to the barriers This one-day seminar will analyse types of claims by towards participation and how to implement successful owners, contractors, and consultants in the construction programs will be presented. As well as discussing the field. Practical preparation and resolution ofsuch claims importance of management support and how to achieve will also be covered. "top-down" participation, participants will learn how to 7666- Nov. 16/90,9:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. assess company wellness needs and how to evaluate "in- Fall: house" employee wellness strategies. Fee: SI30 Hours: 7 Fall: 7714- Oct. 3-5/90 Construction Costing II Oct. 3 & 4,9:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. This course will consist of three, one-day Oct. 5, 9:00 a.m. - noon seminar/workshops designed to apply the fundamentals $185 Hours: 15(2.5 days) for estimating the cost of construction projects covered Fee: inConstruction Costing I. Three tendersubmissions will be prepared for three types of projects: grading and Giving Oral Presentations drainage, a bridge and a building. This seminar is meant primarily for busy professionals Prerequisite: CONSTRUCTION COSTING I who find they must appear more and more before boards, councils, meetings, and the public. It is designed to give these people the chance to understand and Fall: 7676 - Dec. 3 - 5/90,9:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. practice some of the rules-of-thumb that make up a good Fee: $195 Hours: 20 performance. Construction Bonding This two-day seminar will be of interest to middle and Fall: 7632-Nov. 19 & 20/90 upper management of construction firms, building 7634-Dec. 10 & 11/90 owners and allied professions. An in-depth review ofall Winter: 7636-Jan. 28 & 29/91 aspects of surety credit including underwriting 7638 - Mar. 25 & 26/91 requirements, bond forms, administration of a bond Time: 9:00a.m.-4:30 p.m. Hours: 13 (2 days) account and claims will be dealt with. The second day Fee: $140 will be mainly a workshop for questions, answers and discussion. Be prepared to come with instances, Industrial Risk Analysis and Management examples and queries. * This one-day seminar features a number of special speakers from Alberta industry in the field of Winter: 7752- Feb. 13 & 14/91,9:00 a.m. - 4:30p.m. Occupational Health and Safety. It will focus on the Fee: $150 Hours: 13 developing practice of risk analysis which has claimed much attention in the last few years. Other seminars will from time to time be designed with the requirements of the Program in mind and students Fall: 7662- Nov. 20/90,9:00 a.m. - 4:30p.m. will be informed. Fee: S95 Hours: 7 (1 day) B. Transfers From Particular University Labour Relations '.'•pvr completfor of thlc semirsar the j-articipanu 4*#;1 For core courses, a maximum of 78 hours (two courses) have an understanding of union philosophy, aims and will be accepted as transfer or equivalent upon evidence objectives, and their relationship to corporate that these were taken and passed at a recognized management; have knowledge of union organization university, providing the courses are judged to have the structure and hierarchy, together with internal governing same general level and content as the course in this control mechanisms of unions across Canada; and have Program. For options, reasonable equivalencies of up to an understanding of union commitment to industrial 39 hours will be considered. safety and health programmers. C. Other Courses Given by the Faculty Winter: 7646 - Mar. 7 & 8/91,9:00 a.m. - 4:30p.m. This option category is available to allow students to Fee: $140 Hours: 13 (2 days) apply for permission to take courses already developed in other Faculty programs to complement their learning. A maximum of 30 hours for any one course will be allowed. rar Administrative Control Systems An overview of the fundamental components required to Fundamentals of Project Management establish a construction company will initially be Comprehensive Seminar presented. After establishing the company based on The 39 hours of option courses/seminars must be taken specific budgets, goals and objectives, the operating at any time before the Comprehensive seminar. characteristics will generally be defined. After a successful tender, the contractor implements control systems to monitor the cost, quality and timing of the For further information on the Construction project. The lessons will focus on the administrative Administration Certificate Program, please call 492-5532. organization required to conform to the owner's requirements and the estimated cost. CourseDescriptions Winter: 7754 - Dates to be announced Compulsory Courses (Core) 7:00-10:00 p.m. Fee: S225 ' Hours: 39 Construction Flanning and Scheduling This evening course will emphasize critical path planning Fundamentals of ProjectManagement and scheduling methods; network diagrams; bar charts; This course will cover the definition and concept of time, resource and cost interrelationships and analysis project management; organizational structures involved for selection of crew, method and equipment; resource and their relationships; scope of work; planning and levelling; monitoring and updating of project schedules; scheduling; control of cost, time, and scope; project group planning techniques; and an introduction to administration; and people component. computer applications. Workshop sessions and exercises will illustrate practical construction Spring: 7932 - Wed. &Sat., April 3 - May 15/91 considerations. Wed.- 7:00 - 10:00 p.m. Sat. -9:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m. Fall: 7694 - Tues., Sept.4 - Nov.27/90 Fee $225 Hours: 39 7:00-10:00p.m. Fee: $225 Hours: 39 Comprehensive Seminar Aone-day, 10-hour summative session which will place Contract Law and Construction Documents into perspective all of the courses given in the Program This course will cover the nature of contracts; give an with emphasis on how the various processes tie into the overview of contract documents; legal obligations of original objectives of the project, which is to construct a contracting parties; review types of construction quality product inan efficient and effective way. contracts; security; insurance; limitation periods; settlement of disputes by negotiation, arbitration, and litigation; liens; and remedies. Option Courses Fall: 7696-Wed.,Sept. 5-Nov. 28/90 Most options are designed specifically for the Program 7:00 -10:00 p.m. and each has an assignment which must be completed pce: S225 Hours: 39 within three weeks ofthe end of the course. Afull point will be deducted for late submissions. Construction Costing This course will cover the fundamentals for estimating A. Seminars Designed for the Program '.he cost of construction projects; types of cost estimates Understanding Specifications in Construction ind their purpose; the progressive development of cost The construction industry, more than most fields, is very estimates from project conception through to sensitive to specific detail. This, combined with the fact completion; the tendering process; the preparation of that virtually all construction is performed under detailed tender estimates including the determination of contract, requires complete and concise specification of productivity as a factor in scheduling; costing site requirements. Specifications determine the quality, cost, overheads; application of head office overhead and length, and to some degree the type of activity profit; and final assembly of a tender. contemplated. This 2-day seminar discusses "construction specs" by type, format, principles and Winter: 7698 - Wed., Jan. 2 - Mar. 27/91 practices, front end documents, and technical 7:00-10:00 p.m. requirements. It is designed for industry personnel who Fee: $225 Hours: 39 need a sound understanding of the subject. -in — MINISTER OF MUNICIPAL AFFAIRS 127 Legislature Building, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T5K 2B6 403/427-3744 October 3, 1990 .,,/> r>" y S Mr. Henry Rondeau, Reeve ft' Municipal District of Brazeau No. 77 P.O. Box 77 Drayton Valley, Alberta i TOE 0M0 Dear Mr. Rondeau: Thank you for your letter of September 14, 1990 regarding the current financial status of the Brazeau Foundation. I can appreciate the major financial obligation for a Foundation in setting up a lodge facility. The Alberta Mortgage and Housing Corporation, however, has no funding provision for awarding grants to a Foundation for the purpose of assisting in that responsibility. The Brazeau Foundation may wish to give consideration to some alternatives which have been successfully implemented by other Foundations throughout the Province. Subsequent to a thorough review of the annual operating budget for the lodge to determine the anticipated shortfall, a meeting with all contributing municipalities should be scheduled. Details of the shortfall warrant a discussion with the contributing municipalities who, under the Master Agreement, have a responsibility to share in the lodge operating deficits. Consideration and approval to proceed with an acceptable funding alternative such as follows may be suggested. r Make application to a local bank or other lending institution to borrow funds sufficient to cover the anticipated shortfall through year end. As Foundations are incorporated by Ministerial Order under the Senior Citizens' Housing Act, they have full power under this Act. In recognition of this status, the lending institution may be in a position to grant loan approval. I have enclosed a copy of the Ministerial Order relative to the Brazeau Foundation as well as a copy of n)T£££C^rpnn^-pr- the Master Agreement between the AMHC and the contributing municipalities. These documents should assist the lending institution in understanding the viability of your Foundation. UimLTL3IEJl3DHjT3l1L'JUj ...2/ Mr. Henry Rondeau, Reeve Municipal District of Brazeau No. 77 Page 2 October 3, 1990 Consider a policy whereby contributing municipalities are requisitioned on the basis of the operating budget and on a monthly or quarterly schedule. This process will provide operating funds on a more actual and regular basis. Implementation of one or both of these alternatives may provide the necessary assistance in administering the Shangri-La Lodge through the first year of operation. During the second year and subsequent years, when funding through the Lodge Assistance Grant is available to offset operating deficits, the financial burden should be less difficult. I trust this information will assist the Brazeau Foundation. In the event you have further questions or require additional assistance, "* Mrs. Jolayne Watt, District Manager in the Edmonton District Office of Alberta Mortgage and Housing Corporation, would be pleased to help and may be reached by calling 468-0703. Yours sincerely, nss F«iHSc Raymond A. Speaker Minister Enclosures. cc: Tom Thurber, M.L.A. Drayton Valley Constituency (w$' -113— MUNICIPAL DISTRICT OF BRAZEAU NO. 77 BY-LAW NO. 116-90 BEING A BY-LAW OF THE MUNICIPAL DISTRICT OF BRAZEAU NO. 77, IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA, TO ENTER INTO AGREEMENT WITH HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA, HEREINAFTER REPRESENTED BY THE MINISTER OF TRANSPORTATION AND UTILITIES, TO PROCEED WITH A TRANSPORTATION STUDY. WHEREAS, under the provisions of Section 116 of the Municipal Government Act, being Chapter M-26 of the Revised Statutes of Alberta, 1980, (as amended), the Council for the Municipal District of Brazeau No. 77, in the Province of Alberta, may pass a By-Law authorizing the making of an agreement with Her Majesty the Queen, in right of the Province of Alberta, hereinafter represented by the Minister of Transportation and Utilities to proceed with a Transportation Study. NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council for the Municipal District of Brazeau No. 77 in Council assembled enacts as follows: THAT, the Reeve and Municipal Manager of the Municipal District of Brazeau No. 77 be and are hereby empowered to exeute an agreement as attached between the said Municipality and Her Majesty the Queen, in right of the Province of Alberta, hereinafter represented by the Minister of Transportation and Utilities, to proceed with a Transportation Study. READ a first time this day of ., A.D., 1990. READ a second time this day of , A.D., 1990. READ a third time with the unanimous consent of the Councillors present and finally passed this day of A.D., 1990. REEVE •pv MUNICIPAL MANAGER -nq OS* THIS AGREEMENT MADE AS OF THE Ist DAY OF OCTOBER, 1990. BETWEEN: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, in right of the Province of Alberta, hereinafter represented by the Minister of Transportation and Utilities (hereinafter referred to as the "Province" OF THE FIRST PART -and - MUNICIPAL DISTRICT OFBRAZEAU No. 77, a Municipal Corporation in the Province of Alberta, (hereinafter referred to as "Brazeau") OF THE SECOND PART WHEREAS, "Brazeau" desires to proceed with a Transportation Study. AND WHEREAS, the"Province" is willing to share the costs of the Study; ISR NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and conditions hereinafter specified the "Province" and "Brazeau" agree as follows: I. "Brazeau" shall engage the services of GCG DILLON Ltd. (hereinafter referred to a* as the "Consultant") to prepare the Municipal District of Brazeau Transportation Study (hereinafter called the "Study"). 2. The "Study" shall be directed by a Management Committee composed of the following: (a) M.D. of Brazeau - 2 representatives. 1 (b) Yellowhead Regional Planning Commission - I representative. (c) Alberta Transportation and Utilities - 2 representatives. A representative from "Brazeau" shall act as Chairman of the Management Committee. 1 -U5- -2- 'PW 3. The duties of the Management Committee shall be: a. to review and approve the final terms of reference for the "Study"; b. to have each member act as a contact to the "Consultant" in obtaining information concerning his/her respective agency; c. to have each member obtain and reflect the views/policies of their respective council or agency; d. to direct and monitor progress of the "Study" by reviewing and commenting on interim draft reports; e. to recommend payment of accounts ensuring they comply with the terms and conditions of the "Study"; f. to record, in the form of minutes, the motions, discussions, and actions of the '•Wl "Study"; and g. to review and approve the draft final report. 4. The "Province" shall reimburse "Brazeau" for 75% of the cost of preparing the "Study" up to a maximum of twenty-two thousand three hundred ninety five dollars ($22,395.00) upon the Management Committee approving payment of the applicable accounts and upon "Brazeau" submitting detailed invoices to the "Province", PROVIDED HOWEVER, that the "Province" shall be the sole judge as to what costs are shareable in the case of any dispute. 5. "Brazeau" shall pay for the balance of the cost of preparing the "Study". 6. "Brazeau" shall provide twenty-five (25) copies of all final reports to the "Province" upon completion of the "Study". IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written. MUNICIPAL DISTRICT OF BRAZEAU NO. 77 HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA, HEREINAFTER REPRESENTED BY THE MINISTER OF TRANSPORTATION AND UTILITIES REEVE PROVINCE WITNESS WITNESS —life— UjT FDMONTON ASSOCIATION OF MUNICIPAL DISTRICT AND COUNT IEg (V^-. t' r U^L-JU u. Lai TO ALL METERS """" The meeting of the Edmonton Association of Municipal Districts and Counties will be held at the: Highway Motor Inn 4520 - 76 Avenue Edmonton, Alberta on October 29, 1990 in the Banquet Room Refreshments will be served from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon ) sponsored by Stewart Weir A Co. A smorg luncheon will be served at 12:00 noon. "1 AfiFNDA - Regular Meeting 1. CalI the meeting to order - New President - George Visser 1.1 Thank the Host (Refreshments) 2. Adoption of Minutes - July 30, 1990 3. Business Arising 3.1 1 4. Guest Speaker 4.1 Ernie Walter - Intervention Process m 5. Alberta Municipal Affairs 6. AAND &C- Business j 6.1 Director - John Dechamplain 6.2 Executive Director - Larry Goodhope 6.3 President - Gordon Miller 1, 7. Edmonton Association of M.D. & C. - Business 7.1 Resolutions ^ 7.11 Tax on Oil & Gas Well Drilling Equipment j 7.12 7.13 ** 7.14 7.2 Correspondence 7.21 Letter Municipal District of Sturgeon No. 90 - Increased Cost of Petroleum Products 7.3 County of Wetaskiwin - Definition of a Farmer- Discussion 7.4 Status of Farm Economy - Discussion i .../2 -in— EAMD&C Agenda October 29, 1990 Page 2 8. Other Business 8.1 Livestock Siting - George Visser - Update 8.2 9. Next Meeting - January 28, 1991 10. Adjournment Gilbert J. Boddez, Secretary-Treasurer EDMONTON ASSOCIATION OF MUNICIPAL DISTRICTS AND COUNTIES r ip?> -118- Box 7K 5027 Industrial R Drayton Valley.A' ^ TOE ON' Ph: (403) 542-481 ^P^SPimS Fax: 542-20; TWIN RIVERS SCHOOL DIVISION No.65 nXC.^.iZniLDJ r» r-'." 4 'i 'PDA mms aaaainaa^a 11.-.- VOLUME 2 ISSUE 19 DATE: 90.10.12 **************************************************************** LODGEPOLE SCHOOL The Canadian Amateur Boxing Association bid for the Lodgepole school was approved. MAINTENANCE ASSISTANCE One additional maintenance person will be added through the government sponsored Priority Employment Program (P.E.P.). ENCOUNTERS WITH CANADA Two Twin Rivers students will be attending this Council fori Canadian Unity sponsored event. Students will participate in parts of six themes focusing on Canada: Arts and Culture, Science and Technology, Canadian Studies, Environment and Resources, Economy and Law. EXCHANGE STUDENTS VISIT BOARD MEETING The following students presented their home country education! practices and learned some workings of the Twin River's Board. The Board and Administration were most impressed with the students in attendance: Students From School Jonas Erickson Sweden Frank Maddock High School Susanne Ruissalo Finland Frank Maddock High School Nikola Rothemeyer Germany Frank Maddock High School Borja Perez Perez Spain Frank Maddock High School Anick Leduc Quebec (Away) Breton High School LION'S QUEST PROGRAM The Board of Education expressed support for teacher involvement in the upcoming Lion's Quest Training Program. LEADERSHIP ACADEMY Two Drayton Valley students were recommended for an upcoming Student Leadership Academy, after submitting essays on thej 'Leadership' theme. They were Candida Bilan and Tasneem Lookmanjee. UPCOMING BOARD OF EDUCATION REGULAR MEETING All meetings of the Board are at Central Office November 13 - 6:00 pm and November 15 9:00 a.m. Jreton Elementary School • Breton High School • Lindale School • Eldorado Elementary School • Evergreen Elementary School • Frank MaddocK High School • H.W. Pickup Jr. High 696-3555 696-3633 542-2433 542-5544 542-5535 542-4401 542-4495 -mi- NEWS RELEASE GOVERNMENT OF ALBERTA ^ October 11, 1990 Edmonton 11:00 A.M. GST LEGAL CHALLENGE Dick Johnston, Provincial Treasurer, and Ken Rostad, Attorney General, announced today that the Government of Alberta will proceed with a legal challenge to the proposed Federal Goods and Services Tax (GST). A reference has been directed to the Alberta Court of Appeal under the Judicature Act. It will ask the Court to hear and consider certain questions regarding the constitutional validity of the GST. "This legal challenge is part of our continuing campaign to stop the GST," said Mr. Johnston. "We believe that, in whole and in part, this tax violates several sections of the Canadian Constitution that are clearly in the realm of provincial authority," said Mr. Rostad. There are three key elements to the province's reference: First, the GST infringes upon provincial jurisdiction over property and civil rights by interfering in the regulation of commerce. All businesses through the production and distribution chain are forced to be federal tax collectors, while the purpose of the GST is only to collect net tax revenue from the final consumer. The GST will be an administrative nightmare for every business person. They are regulated to collect the GST for the r federal government and are forced to do so largely at their own expense. m In the case of zero-rated goods, such as exports and food, this entire tax collection superstructure is imposed on businesses for no revenue purpose at all, as the sale of zero-rated commodities yields no net revenue to the federal government. "Alberta businesses do not need another layer of regulations any more than they need another tax", said Mr. Johnston. /2 -ISO— 1 - 2 - Second, the GST attempts to tax provincial Crown property which m contravenes section 125 of the Constitution Act. By levying the j GST on fees charged by the provincial government for certain uses of its natural resources, the federal government effectively taxes the province in the performance of its constitutional responsibility for the management of these natural resources. The GST will also tax provincial property by imposing the tax on top of provincial fuel and tobacco taxes, and liquor revenue, which are Crown property. "We cannot allow this unconstitutional intrusion by the federal government", said Mr. Rostad. Third, the GST increases the tax burden on health care, education and municipal services which are the constitutional responsibility of the province. If the Alberta government were to provide educational services directly, Albertans would not bear a GST burden on education because the Crown has constitutional immunity. Albertans are being penalized for their choice to have education delivered in a manner that is responsive to local concerns• Even with a partial rebate, the GST is an interference with the ^ discharge of a provincial constitutional responsibility. "We J will fight the federal attempt to siphon off money that Albertans pay for health care, education and municipal services", said Mr. p« Johnston. The Canadian economy has already plunged into an Ottawa-made recession under the weight of the high interest rate regime of the federal government. This strategy has been strongly attacked by the Economic Council of Canada in its 1990 Annual Review. The GST will inflict further damage to the national and provincial economies and prolong the recession, if it is implemented. •• 30 — ^ Contact: ,_ Randy K. Dawson * Special Advisor to the Provincial Treasurer **| (403) 427-8809 w ELEMENTS 07 ALBERTA*8 GST COURT CHALLENGE Alberta's challenge to the constitutionality of the GST is based on the opinion provided by legal advisers that the GST may contravene sections 92(13), 103, 125 and 126 of the Constitution Act. 1867. GENERAL QUESTION Question 1 This question is very broad and refers to the Constitution Act in general. It asks the Court to determine whether the GST or any part of it is unconstitutional. This question is intended as a general introduction to the more specific questions and covers general issues not identified in the subsequent specific questions. REGULATION OF BUSINESSES INFRINGES ON PROVINCIAL JURISDICTION Question Number 2 Under the GST, the final consumer is the only one paying the tax on a net basis because at all pre-retail stages the tax paid is fully refunded through the input tax credit. The federal government, therefore, plans to impose controls on businesses to collect a tax which it intends to levy on the final pi consumer only. It is argued that such controls constitute an unnecessary infringement of provincial jurisdiction with respect to the regulation of property and civil rights. Pi Section 92(13) states "In each province the Legislature may exclusively make laws in relation to matters coming within j the classes of subject next herein-after enumerated; that is to say, ... property and civil rights in the province." j Question Number 3 It is also argued that collection of the GST involves P5J costs to every supplier of taxable goods or services and that the federal government has the obligation to repay those costs in full. Section 103 of the Constitution states that "The Consolidated Revenue Fund of Canada shall be permanently charged with the Costs, Charges, and Expenses incident to the Collection, Management, and Receipt thereof. it TAXATION OF PROVINCIAL CROWN PROPERTY Qngsfcion Number 4 Section 125 of the Constitution Act states that "no lands or property belonging to Canada or any province shall be « liable to Taxation." It is argued that the GST contravenes 1 section 125 by taxing Crown property. For example, by imposing the GST on fees charged by the provincial government for certain J uses of its natural resources, the federal government effectively taxes the province in the performance of its constitutional responsibility for the management of these natural resources. The GST also contravenes section 125 by taxing Crown revenue. For example, the GST is levied on provincial fuel and tobacco taxes, the revenue from which is Crown property, and the revenue remitted by the Alberta Liquor Control Board, which is also Crown property. f^lj - 3 - It is also argued that the imposition of the obligation on the Government of Alberta to collect GST on the goods and services it supplies contravenes section 125. Question 5 The collection and remittance of the GST also involves costs for the Government of Alberta. In some cases, the Government of Alberta may be required to remit GST not yet collected. It is argued that the imposition of these costs by the federal government contravenes section 126 of the Constitution Act. It is Alberta's position that section 126 guarantees the integrity of the province's general revenue fund solely for provincial purposes. Therefore, it restricts the federal government's ability to impose expenses unilaterally on the provincial Crown. TAXATION OF GOVERNMENT FUNCTIONS DELIVERED BY PROVINCIAL AUTHORITIES Question Number 6 It is argued that municipalities, universities, schools and hospitals ( the MUSH sector ) provide public services by exercising, on behalf of the Government of Alberta, delegated B) provincial constitutional powers. These functions would be free of GST if they were performed directly by the province. We argue that tax immunity under section 125 therefore extends to purchases by MUSH institutions. Their purchases should be tax free. The Court is asked whether MUSH sector institutions r would be tax free on their purchases if they were specifically designated by the province as being Crown Agents. - 4 - The Court is also asked whether tax free status for the MUSH institutions would be obtained through the following arrangement, which would be made only with the consent of these institutions: • Alberta sets up a Crown Purchase Agency • The Agency purchases goods and services that would be normally purchased by MUSH institutions • As a government department the Agency would not pay GST on purchases • MUSH institutions would acquire goods and services from n the Agency as a grant. The Court is asked whether such grants would be free of GST. ra Liberia ORDER IN COUNCIL APPROVED AND ORDERED, ADMINISTRATOR EDMONTON, ALBERTA WHEREAS the House of Commons of Canada has passed Bill C-62, An Act r to amend the Excise Tax Act, the Criminal Code, the Customs Act, the Customs Tariff, the Excise Act, the Income Tax Act, the Statistics Act and the Tax Court of Canada Act; r WHEREAS the essence of Bill C-62 is as follows: (a) at each stage of the production and distribution chain of a P commercial activity, a remittance (7% of the value of the consideration) is payable by the recipient of a taxable supply, including provincial L authorities, and is generally required to be collected from the recipient on behalf of and paid to the Government of Canada by a registrant r supplier, which requirement purports to bind the Government of Alberta. A registrant is entitled to claim an offset against the remittance collected from a recipient in a reporting period for the remittance paid in the period for any property and services acquired by the registrant for use in the registrant's commercial activities. rThedifference between the remittance collected and the remittance paid for a reporting period will be referred to herein as the "net remittance". If positive (that is, the remittance collected exceeds the remittance paid) the registrant is required to pay the net remittance to the Government of Canada. Conversely, if the net remittance is negative, it is refunded to the registrant by the Government of Canada; (b) net revenue to the Government of Canada arises only at the last stage in the chain referred to in clause (a) in the case of the remittance collected from a consumer or supplier of exempt supplies, since the remittance payable to the Government of Canadaby a registrant at a stage which precedes the consumer or supplier of exempt supplies is subject to an offset; (c) the net remittance is payable to the Government of Canada by a registrant within the time prescribed in the proposed legislation, whether or not the registrant has collected the remittance from the recipient and at the expense of the registrant without compensation by the Government of Canada, other than a transitional credit specified for small businesses in 1991; and WHEREAS the Government of Alberta has concerns that Bill C-62 infringes its rights and the rights of its citizens and its provincial authorities contrary.to the Constitution of Canada; and WHEREAS the Government of Alberta wishes to have the Court of Appeal consider whether some or all of Bill C-62 is contrary to the Constitution of Canada; THEREFORE upon the recommendation of the Honourable the Provincial Treasurer, the Lieutenant Governor in Council, pursuant to section 27 of the Judicature Act, refers the matter in the Appendix to the Court of Appeal for hearing and consideration. CHAIRMAN APPENDIX Interpretation 1(1) In this Appendix, (a) "Alberta property" means property of the Government of Alberta, and includes money and any production from the property; (b) "GST Act" means Part IX of the Excise Tax Act (i) as proposed in Bill C-62, an Act to amend the Excise Tax Act, the Criminal Code, the Customs Act, the Customs Tariff, the Excise Act, the Income Tax Act, the Statistics Act and the Tax Court of Canada Act, and passed by the House of Commons of Canada on April 10,1990, or (il) as enacted by the Parliament of Canada and assented to in Her Majesty's name, if the assent occurs before the beginning of the hearing respecting the questions in this Appendix by the Court of Appeal of Alberta; (c) "provincial authorities" means municipalities, public colleges, universities, school authorities and hospital authorities in Alberta. (2) Words and phrases used in this Appendix have the same meaning as that given to them for the purposes of all or part of the GST Act. m (3) A reference to a section of the GST Act in this Appendix is a reference to the number given to the section in Bill C-62 as described in subsection (l)(b)(i) and is deemed to be a reference to the equivalent section in an enactment described in subsection (l)(b)(ii). Facts and assumptions 2 The answers to the questions set out in the Schedule shall be based on the following: (a) it is assumed that the GST Act is in force; (b) the Government of Alberta is a supplier and raises revenue by providing Alberta property or the rights to or interest in Alberta property by sale, lease, licence or other similar arrangement or by providing a service; (c) paragraph 122(b) and section 221 of the GST Act require the Government of Alberta to collect and pay to the Government of Canada the remittance payable to the rsif 9-90/10/05 Government of Canada by a recipient of a taxable supply provided by the Government of Alberta; (d) the Legislature of Alberta, pursuant to powersvalidly exercised under the Constitution Acts, 1867 to 1982, imposes provincial taxes that are direct taxes on certain commodities and services, including but not limited to fuel oils and tobacco, thereby generating revenues that are Alberta property, and, under section 154 of the GSTAct, the consideration for a taxablesupply, for the purpose of computing the remittance to be paid to the Government of Canada, includes the levy of any provincial tax on the taxable supply other than a prescribed provincial tax; (e) the Government of Alberta, pursuant to powers validly exercised under the Constitution Acts, 1867 to 1982, and through a Crown agent, the Alberta Liquor Control Board, controls and regulates the sale of liquor in Alberta and exercises this control by buyingliquorandselling it to the publicin Alberta for the aggregate of the cost and a profit" to the Government of Alberta that is Alberta property, and, undersection 221of the GST Act, the consideration for the sale of liquor in Alberta by the Alberta Liquor Control Board, for the purpose of computing the remittance to be paid to the Government of Canada, includes that profit; (f) to carry out the obligations purported to be imposed on them as suppliers, the Government of Alberta and other suppliers in Alberta may be required to pay a remittance to the Government of Canada before it is collected from the recipient of a taxable supplysuppliedby the Governmentof Alberta or other suppliers in Alberta andwill incur administrative and other costs incidental to collectingandpaying the remittance; HI (g) the Government of Alberta grants funds from its revenue to provincial authorities for the purpose of permittingthem to purchase supplies, including taxable supplies, (1) in the case of municipalities, for publiclocalgovernment purposes within the constitutional powers of the Legislature of Alberta, (ii) in the caseof school authorities, so that they can provide education up to Pi the post-secondary level, (iii) in the caseof public colleges and universities, so that they can provide post-secondary education, and (iv) in the case of hospital authorities, so that they can provide medical care; (h) through the delegation of Alberta's powerof direct taxation, municipalitiesand pi schoolauthorities are allowed to raise funds for the purpose of permitting them to purchase supplies, including taxable supplies, for the purposes set out in clause (g)(i) and (ii); 9-90/10/05 - 3- & (i) it is implicit, because of section 122 of the GST Act, that the Government of Alberta isnot required to pay aremittance as arecipient of taxable supplies under section 165 of the GST Act, but provincial authorities are not exempted from paying ^ aremittance as recipients of taxable supplies although the purpose for .which the J taxable supplies are obtained isto exercise delegated constitutional powers of the Government of Alberta; cm (j) for the purpose of question 6, it is assumed that the Government of Alberta, pursuant to an enactment, hasdesignated certain provincial authorities, with their ^a approval, as agents of the Government of Alberta in respect of all activities that relate to the exercising of delegated constitutional powers of the Government of Alberta; (k) for the purpose of question 6, it is assumed that (i) the Government of Alberta, directly or indirectly through its agent, the Crown Purchase Agency, pursuant to an agreement withone or more provincial authorities, has established a Crown Purchase Fund, Into which isdeposited revenue of the Government of Alberta, including, if approved by the municipality or school authority, revenue raised by the municipality or school authority through the exercise of delegated direct taxation powers, (ii) therevenue deposited into the Crown Purchase Fund is Alberta property andmay be used to purchase taxablesupplies for the purposes referred to in clause (g), (iii) at the request of a provincial authority, a direct grant maybe made to it from the Crown Purchase Agency in the form of a taxable supply, and (iv) the taxable supplies are for the use of the provincial authorities in the course of their exercising delegated constitutional powers of the Government of Alberta; (1) any explanatoryor other documents or public statements prepared by or made to or by the Government of Canada, or a representative of the Government of P5» Canada, or the House of Commons or the Senate or any member or committee of either, that, in the opinionof counsel for the Government of Alberta, relate to the matters before the Court of Appeal; (m) anyother facts to which counsel for the Government of Albertaagree and which the Court of Appeal allows. 3 The questions to be heardandconsidered by the Courtof Appealare the questions set out in the Schedule. SCHEDULE 9-90/10/05 (5!s pi SCHEDULE Questions 1 Havingregard to the Constitution Acts, 1867 to 1982or otherwise, is the GST Act ultra vires the Parliamentof Canada in whole or in part and, if so, in what particularor particulars and to what extent? 2 Does the system of collection under the GST Act (a) at any stage prior to the supply of taxable supplies to consumers or to suppliers of exempt supplies, pi (b) prior to the collection by a supplier from a recipient, or (c) otherwise t constitute an infringement of the jurisdiction of the Legislature of Alberta with respect to the regulation of property and civil rights pursuant to subsection 92(13) of the Constitution Act, 1867, or of another provincial power under that Act, so that the GST Act in its application of the system of collection or any part of it is ultra vires the Parliament of Canada? £ 3 Having regard to section 103 ofthe Constitution Act, 1867 and the common law, are suppliers entitled to charge and to collect from the Consolidated Revenue Fund of Canada all costs, chargesand expenses incidental to collecting and payinga remittance under *• the GST Act? 4 Having regard to section 125 of the Constitution Act, 1867, IP (a) isthe imposition of obligations under the GST Acton the Government of Alberta as a supplier to collect and pay a remittance on a taxable supply that is Alberta property ultra vires the Parliament of Canada, IP (b) does the impositionof a remittance under the GST Act on a recipient from the Government of Alberta of a taxablesupply that is Alberta propertyor that generates r revenue to the Government of Alberta constitute taxation of Alberta propertythat is ultra vires the Parliament of Canada, and p (c) does the impositionof a remittance that is computed undersection 154 of the GST Act on the basis of consideration for a taxable supply that includes an amount of provincial tax constitute taxation of Alberta property that is ultra vires the m Parliament of Canada? 9-90/10/05 -5- -130— 5 Having regard tosection 126 of the Constitution Act, 1867, is the requirement under the GST Act that the Government of Alberta usepart of the Government of Alberta's revenue (a) to collect a remittance orcause aremittance to becollected, or (b) to pay aremittance prior tothe receipt of the remittance from the recipient of a taxable supply ultra vires the Parliament of Canada? 6 Having regard to sections 125 and 126 of the Constitution Act, 1867, 1 (a) isthe purchase of taxable supplies by provincial authorities, or any of them, in the course of their exercising a delegated constitutional power of the Government of Alberta exempt from tax under the GST Act, 1 (b) is the purchase of taxable supplies by provincial authorities, or any of them, designated as agents of the Government of Alberta, inthe course of their exercising a delegated constitutional power of the Government of Alberta exempt from tax under the GST Act, (c) istheacquisition of taxable supplies by the Crown Purchase Agency referred to in section 2(k) of the Appendix exempt from tax under the GST Act, and (d) is the acquisition or use by provincial authorities, orany of them, in the courseof their exercising a delegated constitutional power of the Government of Alberta, of taxable supplies that are provided bythe Crown Purchase Agency to the provincial authorities exempt from tax under the GST Act? 9-90/10/05 p I. - i 1} FINANCIAL REPORT 1: FOR THE PERIOD If! ENDING 90 09 30 m (September 30, 1990) V/.\ I! m • M.D. OF BRAZEAU NO. 77 SUMMARY OF TRANSACTIONS SEPTEMBER 30, 1990 Balance forward August 31, 1990 $ 227,960.29 Add: Deposits $ 239,545.28 : Term Deposits Matured 2,300,000.00 : Interest Revenue 77.692.55 2.617.237.83 $2,845,198.12 Less: Cheques Issued A/P $1,957,563.59 Payroll 149,953.57 : Term Deposits Purchased 500,000.00 : N.S.F. Cheques 150.00 $ 2.607.667.16 Bank Balance per General Ledger, September 30, 1990 $ 237,530.96 Bank Balance per Treasury Branch September 30, 1990 $ 371,627.12 Less: Outstanding Cheques - A/P $ 122,420.74 - Payroll 11.675.42 $ 134.096.16 Adjusted Bank Balance September 30, 1990 S 237,530.96 M. D. OF BRAZEAU NO. 77 TERM DEPOSITS SEPTEMBER 30, 1990 Balance forward August 31, 1990 $ 9,400,000 Less: Matured September 14, 1990 $ 300,000 Matured September 17, 1990 $1,500,000 Matured September 28, 1990 $ 500.000 2.300.000 $ 7,100,000 Add: Purchased September 30, 1990 500.000 Balance September 30, 1990 $7.600.000 Purchased June 28, 1990 @ 13,.45% for 172 days 1,500,000 Purchased June 29, 1990 @ 13,.45% for 124 days 1,000,000 Purchased June 29, 1990 @ 13,.35% for 259 days 1,400,000 Purchased June 29, 1990 @ 13,.45% for 108 days 400,000 Purchased July 03, 1990 @ 13,.45% for 104 days 500,000 Purchased July 04, 1990 § 13,.48% for 119 days 500,000 Purchased July 04, 1990 @ 13,.43% for 134 days 500,000 Purchased July 04, 1990 @ 13,.43% for 149 days 500,000 Purchased July 04, 1990 @ 13,.32% for 180 days 300,000 Purchased Aug. 15, 1990 @ 12,.90% for 121 days 250,000 Purchased Aug. 31, 1990 @ 12,.55% for 122 days 250,000 Purchased Sept.,28, 1990 @ 12,.50% for 60 days 500.000 $ 7.600,000 Accrued interest to September 30, 1990 229.203 Tj. -r^ Wjj_._...r^__ r*^ p^^ PREPARED 90/10/17 Financial Statement PAGE M-t>. OF BRAZEAU NO. "7 "7 OPERATING REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED September 30, 199Q < TO DATE 1990 REMAINING % BUDGET ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET FUNDS USED OPERATING REVENUES fit EXPENDITURES REVENUE — GENERAL TAXES 1-10-10-00-111 Residential Property Taxes 758,554- 766,810- 8,256- 98.9 1-10-10-00-112 Non Residential Non Farm 756,590- 756,590- 100.0 1-10-10-00-114 Farmland 473,710- 472,430- 1,280 ibo.3 1-10-10-00-115 Machinery & Equipment 1,414,282- 1,433,710- 19,428- 98.6 1-10-10-00-116 ..Railway Right-Of-WaY 2.391- 2,390- 1 100.1 TOTAL REAL PROPERTY TAXES 3,405,527-* 3,431,930-* 26,403-* 99.2 * SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 1-10-11-00-121 Frontage Tax 29,079- 29,000- 79 100.3 TOTAL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 29,079-* 29,000-* 79 * 100.3 * OTHER TAXES 1-10-11-00-191 ?ow§?iines 830,487- 830,480- 7 100.0 l-10-ii-00-192 Pipelines 8,352,993- 8,353,850- 857- 100.0 TOTAL OTHER TAXES 9,183,480-* 9,184,330-* 850-* 100.0 * TOTAL TAXES 12.618.086-* 12,645.260-* 27.174-* 99.8 * GRANTS-IN-LIEU OF TAXES FEDERAL GRANTS-IN-LIEU TOTAL FEDERAL GRANTS-IN-LIEU PROVINCIAL GRANTS-IN-LIEU 1-10-11-00-230 Alberta Housing & Public Works 12,248- 10,710- 1,538 114.4 1-10-11-00-231 A?9.«T. Transmission Lines 53.780- 53,780- 100.0 1-10-11-00-232 A.G.T. Other 2,054- 2,050- 4 100.2 1-10-11-00-233 A.M.H.C. Grants-In-Lieu 830- 830- 1 99.9 TOTAL PROVINCIAL GRANTS-IN-LIEU 68,911-* 67,370-* 1,541 * 102.3 * TOTAL TAXES & GRANTS IN LIEU 12,686,998-* "1277127630-*" 25,632-* 99.8 * -_J-^U_.__^!j _ ^^_.._.p-^| r-^j r-^g. 1/10/17 Financial Statement PAGE M.D. OF BRAZEAU NO. 7 7 OPERATING REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED September 30, 1990 TO DATE 1990 ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION REMAINING % BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET FUNDS USED SALES OF GOODS SERVICES 1-12-10-00-410 Map Sales 2,583- 3,000- 1-12-10-00-420 Other Sales 417- 86.1 77- 2,000- 1-12-10-00-450 Hater Sales 1,923- 3.9 3,360- 4,800- 1-12-16-66-451 Sanitary Sewer 1,440- 70.0 "277652- 427000-- 1-12-10-00-452 F.C.S.S. T4T34V ~~B"5T8- 1,731- 2,300- 1-12-10-00-453 Willy West Park Fees 569- 75.3 3,860- 1,000- 1-12-10-00-454 SCAPXFDRP 2,860 386.0 1,250- 1,250- TOTAL SALES "39TJ55-' 5~6T35U--*~ 17,087-* "59.7 * TOTAL SALES OF GOODS & SERVICES 39,263-* 56,350-* 17,087-' 69.7 * 1 Financial Statement PAGE M.D. OF BRAZEAU NO. 77 OPERATING REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED September 30, 1990 TO DATE ACCOUNT NUMBER 1990 REMAINING i"BUDGET DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET FUNDS USED REVENUE FROM OWN SOURCES LICENCES & PERMITS 1-12-10-00-510 ..Mobile Home Licences 94,459-^ 80,000- 1-12-10-00-515 14,459 118.1 Development Permits 6 Appeals 14,666- 1-12-10-00-520 17,000- 2,334- 86.3 Oil Well Drilling Tax 15,322- 50,000- 34,678- 30.6 TOTAL LICENCES & PERMITS 124,447-' 147,000-* 22,553-* 84.7 * RETURN ON INVESTMENTS 1-12-10-00-521 Investment Interest 545,831- 1-12-10-00-522 550,000- 4,169- 99.2 AAMD&C Dividend 2,132- 5,000- 2,868- 42.6 TOTAL RETURN ON INVESTMENTS 547,963-* 555,000-* 7,037-* 98.7 * PENALTIES & COSTS 1-12-10-00-560 Penalty On Taxes 35,105- 55,000- 1-12-10-00-562 19,895- 63.8 Interest On Overdue Accounts 9,945- 13,000- 3,055- 76.5 .TOTAL PENALTIES & COSTS 45,050-* 68,000-* 22,950-* 66.3 * OTHER REVENUE OWN SOURCES 1-12- 10-00- 590 Commission On H. T. D. 645- 900- 1-12- 10-00-•591 255- 71.7 Tax Certificates 3,792- 1-12- 16-00- 593 2^000^, 1,792 189.6 Other Revenues 15,487- " i,o6d- 1-12- 10-00- 594 Rental & Lease Revenues 14,487 1548.75 12,473- 35,000- 1-12- 10-00- 596 Sale of Cemetery Plots 22,527- 35.6 400- 300- 1-12- 10-00- 597 ASB Equipment Rental 100 133.3 745- 1,000- 1-12- 10-00- 598 Snow Plowing 255- 74.5 33- 2,000- 1Z12- 10^00- 599 Dust Control 1,967- 1.7 1,100- 2,000- 1-12" io-oo: 600 Dog Pound Fees/Fines 900- 55.0 691- 500- 1-12- 10-00- 601 191 Tssn— Public Safety/Violations 7,702- 6,000- 1-12- 10-00- 602 1,702 128.4 Subscriptions 880- 1-12- 10-00- 603 Public Works Equipment Rental 880 854- 854 1-12- 10-00- 604 Bus To Swim 1,420- 1,420 f—^7 r—-| /—J ^ '^sSf TT^j fpARLntb/lcTT Financial staxeraent PAGE M.D. OF BRAZEAU NO. 77 OPERATING REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED September 30, 1990 -< TO DATE 1990 ACCOUNT NUMBER REMAINING % BUDGET DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET FUNDS USED TOTAL OTHER REVENUE OWN SOURCES 46,222-* 50,700-* 4,478-* 91.2 * TOTAL REVENUE OWN SOURCES 763,682-* 820,700-* 57,018-' 93.1 ^ % 3parL« lb/it/ Financial Statement PAGE 5 M.D. OF BRAZEAU NO. 77 OPERATING REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED September 30, 1990 TO DATE ACCOUNT NUMBER 1990 REMAINING % BUDGET DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET FUNDS USED GRANTS FEDERAL GRANTS 1-12-10-00-610 Federal Grants TOTAL FEDERAL GRANTS .0 PROVINCIAL OPERATING GRANTS PROV. UNCONDITIONAL GRANTS 1-12-10-00-741 Prov. Interest Stabilization Grant 9,921- 43,700- 1-12-10-00-742 Provincial Start-up Grant 33,779- 22.7 1-12-10-00-743 Provincial Ample Grant 140,013- 1-12-10-00-744 140,000- 13 100.0 Prov. Municipal Assistance Grant 158,712- 158,700- 12 100.0 TOTAL PROV. UNCONDITIONAL GRANT 308,646-* 342,400-* 33,754-* 90.1 * PROV. CONDITIONAL GRANTS 1-12- 10-00- 746 Prov. Conditional Grant CASCI 4,500- 1,500-" 3,000 1-12- 10-00- 747 Provincial Cond. Grant Pep/Step 300.0 10,289- 15,000- 4,711- 1-12- 10-00- 748 Prov. Cond. Grants - F.C.S.S. 68.6 1-12- 10-00- 749 Prov. Cond. Grants - Seniors trans. 16,507- 16,800- 1-12- 10-00- 750 293- 98:3 Willy West Park Operating Grant 20,000- 10r00-lZ51 20,000- 100.0 Tr§nsportation_Grant_ 106,315- 205,680- 1-12- 10-00- 752 99,365- 51.7 Dust Control (Transportation) 21,30i- 21,300- 1-12- 10-00- 753 Engineering 1~ 100.0 4,590- 1-12- 10-00- 754 4,590- C R c (Recreation) 3,000- 1-12- 10-00- 755 Agriculture 3,000 74,490- 80,200- 5,710- 1-12- 10-00- 756 Utility Officer 92.9 25,000- 25,000- iri2- 10-00- 757 Surface Reclamation 100.0 _4,_638-_ 4,100- 1-12- io-oo- 758 Utility Study 538 113.1 1-12- 10-00- 759 FCSS/Election Expense 60,090- 76,000- 15,910- 79.1 TOTAL PROVINCIAL CONDITIONAL GRANTS 346,129-* 470,170-* 124,041-* 73.6 * TOTAL PROVINCIAL GRANTS 654,775-* 812,570-*" 157,795-* 80.6 * 1-12-10-00-840 Gen Admin-Prov. Conditional Grants 1-12-10-00-841 Provincial Cond. Grant Pep/Step 1-12-10-00-843 Willy West Park Operating Grant w rnsPARuuETJUo'n* ^> Financial Statement PAGE 6 M . E> _ OF BRAZEAU NO. 77 OPERATING REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED September 30, 1990 < TO DATE ACCOUNT NUMBER 1990 REMAINING V BUDGET DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET FUNDS USED LOCAL GOV'T. UNCONDITIONAL GRANT 1-12-10-00-845 Local Gov't. Unconditional Grant TOTAL LOCAL GOV'T. UNC0ND~IT7~GRAiiTT •'^f- r»PMsrfc/ii^j ~~* —§ "'~i Financial Statement PAGE M-D. OF BRAZEAU NO. 77 ^ - OPERATING REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED September 30, 1990 TO DATE ACCOUNT NUMBER 1990 REMAINING % BUDGET DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET FUNDS USED MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 1-12-10-00-850 Miscellaneous Revenue 9,689- 1-12-10-00-851 10,000- 311- 96.9 MUN/BD. YELLOWHEAD LIB. CONTRIB'N 27,578- 1-12-10-00-852 27,600- 22- 99.9 Brazeau Foundation 13,500- 13,500^ 100.0 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 50,767-' 51,100-* 333-* 99.4 * REVENUE - GENERAL ADMIN. 1-12-10-00-920 Gen Admin-Drawn From Oper Reserves 256,200- 1-12-10-00-941 ggi°g.Year Surplus 256,200- 1-12-16-66-945 _67c570- 67,570- Vehicle Rental-Common Services 748,172- £,032,900- 284,728- 72.4 TOTAL REVENUE - GENERAL ADMIN, 748,172-* 1,356,670-* 608,498-* 55.2 * TOTAL REVENUE 14,943,657- 15,8i6,620-*" 866,363-* 94.5 * F ^ " •* Financialnfi statement PAGE M.D. OF BRAZEAU NO. 77 OPERATING REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED September 30, 1990 < TO DATE 1990 REMAINING ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION % BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET FUNDS USED EXPENDITURES LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL 2-11-10-00-151 Council Honouraria 15,650 25,000 2-11-10-00-152 Council Admin, and Supervision 9,350 62 6 40,775 50,000 2-11-10-00-153 9,225 81 .6 Other Committee Meetings 45,680 2-11-10-00-154 50,000 4,320 91 4 Conventions 8,800 2-11-10-00-156 15,000 6,200 58 7 Benefits 2,236 2,400 164 93 2 TOTAL LEGISLATIVE 113,141 * 142,400 29,259 * 79. 5 * TRAVEL & SUBSISTENCE 2^11-10-00-211 Council Travel & Subsistence 15,577 25,000 2-li-i0-66-2i2 Council Mileage 9,423 62.3 127377 15,000 - 2-11-10-00-214 T75T3- ~~BTT2- Council Membership/Confer. Fees 5,655 7,000 2-11-10-00-217 Council Telephone 1,345 80.8 1,500 2-11-10-00-219 1,500 Council Hospitality 2,758 2,500 258- 110.3 TOTAL TRAVEL & SUBSISTENCE 36,468 * 51,000 * 14,532 * 71.5 TOTAL COUNCIL 149,609 193,400 * 43,791 * 77.4 ELECTIONS 2-11-20-00-158 Election Expenses TOTAL ELECTIONS .0 TOTAL LEGISLATIVE 149,609 193,400 * 43,791 * 77.4 PREPARED 90/10/17 Financial Statement PAGE M.D. OF BRAZEAU NO. 77 OPERATING REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED September 30, 1990 r-- TO DATE ACCOUNT NUMBER 1990 REMAINING % BUDGET DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET FUNDS USED GENERAL ADMINISTRATION j2-12-10-00-111 Salaries & Wages 258,781 367,900 2-12-10-00-112 Wages Temporary 109,119 70.3 3,217 8,000 2-12-10-00-113 Wages PEP/STEP 4,783 40.2 3,477 8,000 2=12-10-60-114 Benefits" 4,523 43.5 "377952 51,000" 2-12-10-00-115 "13,038" T4*r?— W.C.B. 15,550 28,000 12,450 55.5 TOTAL GENERAL ADMINISTRATION 318,987 462,900 143,913 68.9 * GENERAL SERVICES 2-12-10-00-211 Gen Admin -Travel & Subsistence 3,588 13,000 2-12-10-00-212 Gen Admin -Mileage 27.6 5,997 7,500 j2-12-10-00-213 Gen Admin -Working Lunches 80.0 503 1,000 I2-12-10-00-215 50.3 Gen Admin - Freight/Express/Cartage 1,176 2,000 1 2-12-10-00-216 Gen Admin -Postage 58.8 8,038 8,000 2-12 10-00-217 100.5 Gen Admin -Telephone * II,"119 20,666 2-12 10-00-221 ~5576" Advertising & Subscriptions 10,974 8,000 2-12 10-00-231 137.2 Gen Admin -Accounting & Auditing 2,915 12,000 2-12 10-00-232 Gen Admin -Legal 24.3 4,539 20,000 2-12 10-00-239 22.7 Staff Development & Training 5,884 5,000 2r12 10-00-244 Bad Debts _ 117.7 2-12 io-66 -249* Memberships & Registrations "1679i9 67666 2-12 10-00-253 Equipment & Furniture Repairs/Maint 4,919- 182.0 1,221 750 2-12 10-00 -254 Furniture & Equipment 471- 162.9 40 10,000 2-i2 10-00 -255 Grants 9,960 .4 3,855 6,000 2-12 10-00 -256 Stationery & Supplies 2,145 64.3 18,952 35,000 2-12 10-00 -262 Equipment_Rentals 16,048 54.2 500 |2-12 10-00-265 Other General Services 500 ""7TOO8" 25,000 i 2-12 10-00- 271 Gen Admin -Licenses & Permits 17,992 28.0 69 2,000 2-12- 10-00-274 General Admin. Insurance 1,932 3.4 28,355 35,000 j2-12 10-00- 341 Land Titles Office Services 6,645 81.0 5,296 7,500 2-12 10-00-342 Provincial Assessor's Fees Annual 2,204 70.6 30,000 '1-12- 10-00-343 Queen's.Printer 30,000 200 i2-12 io-66-344 200 Provincial Assessor's Fees General 90,000 , 2-12 10-00-510 Utilities 90,000 10,326 15,000 i2-12 10-00-516 Computer Programming 4,674 68.8 6,053 7,500 2-12 10-00- 517 Computer Supplies 1,447 80.7 3,594 15,000 2-12 10-00-519 Computer Contract 11,406 24.0 49 7,500 2^12; 10-00-521 Contracts -Management 7,451 .7 2-12- 10-00-55i ContractI -General " 2,827 2-12- 10-00-763 4,000 1,173 1STT Office Building Maintenance 5,741 2-12- 10-00-764 20,000 14,259 28.7 Janitoral & Disposal Services 11,136 2-12- 10-00-770 15,000 3,864 74.2 Census/Election 1,258 2-12-10-00-798 1,258- Salary Payouts 16,170 2-12-10-00-799 Payroll Clearing 16,170- 54,957- 54,957 •?«*m*Q r^f- fim**g— -m&$ FW|- hapAR^rfc/K^Tf Financial Statement PAGE 10 M.D- OF 6RAZEAU NO. 7 7 OPERATING REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED September 30, 1990 TO DATE 1990 ACCOUNT NUMBER REMAINING % BUDGET DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET FUNDS USED TOTAL GENERAL SERVICES 132,645 * 428,450 * 295,805 * 31.0 * FINANCIAL SERVICE CHARGES 2212-10-00-810 Short Term Borrowing^ __ 2-i2-io-66-8ii _?6 500 404 19.3 Bank service" charges 20 166 80 20.0 TOTAL FINANCIAL SERVICE CHARGES 116 600 * 484 19.4 * ADMINISTRATION BUILDING DEBENTURE 2-12-10-00-831 Interest 2-12-10-00-832 Principle "1077290 107,290 40,430 40,430 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION DEBENTURES 147,720 * 147,720 * .0 TOTAL GENERAL ADMINISTRATION 451,748 * 1,0397670 * 587,922 * 43.5 "^^PAR^^lo/l^ r^^ —^ PAGE 11 M.D. OF BRAZEAU NO. "7 7 OPERATING REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED September 30, 1990 TO DATE 1990 REMAINING ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION % BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET FUNDS USED PROTECTIVE SERVICES ENFORCEMENT 2-21-00-00-111 Enforcement - Salaries & Wages 24,967 48,000 2-21-00-00-114 Enforcement- Benefits 23,033 52.0 3,327_ 7,680 4,353 43.3 TOTAL ENFORCEMENT 28,294 * 55,680 * 27,386 * 50.8 * GENERAL SERVICES 2-21r10-00-211 Travel and.Subsistence 113 1,500 2-21-i6-66-2i2 Mileage " 1,387 7.5 S2§- 906 2-21-10-00-214 Memberships and Registrations —37r "5"g73" 2-21-10-00-215 Furniture and Equipment 400 400 720 1,500 ! 2-21-10-00-216 Vehicle - fuel 780 48.0 j2-21-10-00-217 Vehicle - repairs I2-21-10-00-218 Animal Control/By-law Enforcement 4,673 6,800 1*2-21-16-66-219 Equipment 2,127 68.7 &'Supplies ~ 3,6H 4,566 " I2-21-10-00-220 Communications -I7459- ~66T9" 4,452 5,000 2-21-10-00-545 Vehicle Rental 548 89.0 7,379 22,200 14,821 33.2 TOTAL GENERAL SERVICES 20,872 * 42,800 * 21,928 * 48.8 * TOTAL ENFORCEMENT"SERVICES- "49"; 166 ~*~ 98T480*" ~4-973"T4"*- 49.9 * FIRE PROTECTION I2-23-10- •00-111 Fire Guardian Expenses 3,029 8,000 {J-23-10- 00-212 _Fire Guardians - mileage 4,971 37.9 i2-23-16- 00-23i Contracts - Local Government "116 ,454" 115 ,000" !2-23-10- 00-238 Utilities - Lodgepole 1,454- 101.3 914 2 ,000 i2-23-10- 00-239 Insurance 1,086 45.7 2,032 I2-23-10- 00-240 1 ,000 1,032- 203.2 Small tools & equipment 1,333 j2-23-10- 00-250 Operational Expenses 1 r500 167 88.9 8,468 ,000 |2-23-10- 00-251 Building Repairs & Maintenance 9 532 94.1 |2-23-16-66-252 Fire - Contract Services " 500 500 "2,372 ,500 !2-23-10- 00-271 Fire Permits 1 SIIP 158.1 ~ • !2-23-10- 00-545 Vehicle Rental 1,162 1,162- TOTAL FIRE PROTECTION 135,763 * 138 ,500 * 2,737 * 98.0 * DISASTER "SERVICES" 2-24-10-00-211 Travel and subsistence 124 2-24-10-00-212 Mileage 1, 200 1,076 10.3 253 2-24-10-00-220 900 647 28.1 Publications - library 112 2-24-10-00-230 200 88 55.8 Equipment and supplies 545 2, 000 1,455 27.2 J r^l PAR-.. 90/It,, ^ Financial statement % M.D. OF BRAZEAU NO. 77 OPERATING REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED September 30, 1990 TO DATE 1990 ACCOUNT NUMBER REMAINING % BUDGET DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET FUNDS USED TOTAL DISASTER SERVICES 1,033 * 4,300 * 3,267 * 24.0 * AMBULANCE SERVICE 2-25-10-00-771 Drayton Valley Ambulance Service 2-25-16-66-772 Pembina Valley Regional Ambulance ~ 35T5J3 357600 "" 2-25-10-00-773 Leduc Contract 6T" "59-TY TOTAL AMBULANCE 35,533 * 35,600 * 67 99.8 * P UBLIC SAFETY SERVICES 2-26-10-00-208 Animal Control TOTAL PROTECTIVE SERVICES 221,495 * 276,880 * 55,385 * 80.0 * _y 1 1 1 ' **»*§• ^T)' »ARL« S>/lo7T^ Financial Statement PAGE 13 M.D. OF BRAZEAU NO. 77 .OPERATING REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE FOR THE_PBPTnn Mncn September 30, 1990 TO DATE 1990 ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION REMAINING % BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET FUNDS USED PUBLIC WORKS P.W. ADMINISTRATION SALARIES/WAGES 2-32-10-00-111 P.W. Admin. - Supervision 95,402 152,420 2-32"-16-66-ii2 57,018 62.6 P.W. Admin. - Wages - Full-time 16,420 2-32-10-00-113 P.W. Admin. - Seasonal 16,420- 6,507 6,000 2-32-10-00-114 Benefits 507- 108.5 17,815 20,500 2-32-10-00-115 Wages Pep/Step 2,685 86.9 4,492 4,492- „. TOTAL ADMINISTRATION SALARIES 140,637 178,920 * 38,283 * 78.6 P. W. GENERAL ADMINISTRATION 2-32-10-00-211 Travel and subsistence 5,846 2-32-10-00-212 9,500 3,654 61.5 Mileage 2,715 2_-32-10-00-214 Memberships and registrations 2,300 415- 118.0 1,001 800 2-32-16-66-220 Leases 201- 125.1 " 17465 5,000 2-32-10-00-221 3,535 29.3 Advertising 2,290 2-32-10-00-223 3,000 710 76.3 Furniture & Equipment 296- 2-32-10-00-239 Staff development and training 4,000 4,296 7.4 2-32-10-00-278 Consultants 3,045 2r32-10-00-511 Office sugplies__ 5,000 1,955 60.9 _5'??8 5,000 2-32-16-66-519 Computer Programming 298- 106.0 6,490 10,000 2-32-10-00-545 Vehicle Rental 3,510 64.9 16,721 20,200 2-32-10-00-551 Contracts - General 3,479 82.8 239 239- TOTAL P. W. ADMINISTRATION 44,814 ' 64,800 19,986 * 69.2 * 2-32-10-00-831 P.W. Shop Interest 2-32-10-00-832 P.W. Shop Principle 2-32-10-00-833 Equipment Interest 2-32-10-00-834 Equipment Principle .TOTAL P..W._ADJH|INISTRATION 185,451 * _243t720_* 58,269 * 76.1 GENERAL MAINTENANCE GEN'L MAINTENANCE SALARIES & WAGES 2-32-10-01-111 Supervision 2-32-16-61-113 2J.,703 26,500 4,797 General Roads-Wages-Special "Project 8,387 32,200 _8Ll9 2-32-10-01-114 Benefits 23,813 26. T 32,628 37,730 2-32-10-01-115 Wages - Full Time 5,102 86.5 150,237 141,300 2-32-10-01-116 Wages - Seasonal 8,937- 106.3 73,375 35,800 37,575- 205.0 TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES 286,329 273,530 12,799-* 104.7 * ! "^Wrm/ioTT^ Financial Statement PAGE 14 M.D. OF BRAZEAU NO. 77 OPERATING REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED September 30, 1990 TO DATE 1990 REMAINING ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION % BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET FUNDS USED GEN'L MAINTENANCE GENERAL 2-32- 10-01 -532 Brushing 2-32- 10-01- 533 Bridge supplies 2,000 2-32- 10-01--534 Sand and salt 2,000 3,598 40,000 2-32- io-6i- 535 Patch and crack seal 36,402 9.0 42,262 40,000 2-32- 10-01- 536 Signs and road marking ~272er "lUSTT 25,343 39,600 2-32- 10-01- 537 Culverts 14,257 64.0 86,601 20,000 2-32- 10-01- 538 Miscellaneous Repairs 66,601- 433.0 795 5,000 2-32- 10-01- 539 Hired equipment 4,205 15.9 40,536 32,300 2-32- 10-01- 540 Beaver Flood Devices 8,236- 125.5 8,408 19,800 2-32: 16-6i- 544 Street lighting 11,392 42.5 17;il0 29;500 2-32- 10-01- 545 Vehicle Rental T27TOO- ~~58TS- 189,197 191,500 2-32- 10-01- 546 Misce. Repairs 2,303 98.8 TOTAL GEN'L MAINTENANCE GENERAL 413,851 * 419,400 * 5,549 98.7 * TOTAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE "766TI86 * 6927930 * 77750-: irrm-»- GRADER OPERATIONS GRADER OPERATIONS SALARIES & WAGES 2-32-10-02-111 Grader - Supervision " I6,7i6 2-32-10-02-112 22 p050 5,334 75.8 Grader - Wages - Full-time 140,304 2-32-10-02-114 196 ,200 55,896 71.5 Grader - Benefits 26,624 2-32-10-02-115 38 ,620 11,996 68.9 Grader - Wages - Seasonal 27,042 2-32-10-02-116 Wages Special Projects 22 400 4,642- 120.7 700 700 TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES 210,686 * 279,970 69,284 " 75.3 " GRADER OPERATIONS GENERAL j2-32-10-02-210 Memberships & Registrations 2-32-10-02-211 Travel & Subsistence _ 2-32-16-02-213 Mileage 2-32-10-02-511 Contract grading 50,129 65,000 2-32-10-02-521 Grader blades 14,871 77.1 2-32-10-02-528 Utilities - graders 1,350 2,700 2-32-10-02-545 1,350 50.0 Vehicle Rental 276,068 396,900 120,832 69.6 TOTAL GRADER" OPERATIONS "GENERAL " 327,547 * 464,600 ••*• U/fUb3 • VO. b " TOTAL GRADER OPERATIONS 538,233 * 744,570 * 206,337 * 72.3 * GRAVELLING Sc DUST CONTROL J r^ »ARL_ 1/1oTT!! ^ "**§ ""*"*• P1jLnancrialil ataf(statement PAGE 15 M.D. OF BRAZEAU NO. 77 OPERATING REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED September 30, 1990 -< TO DATE 1990 jACCOUNT NUMBER REMAINING % BUDGET DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET FUNDS USED GRAVELLING & DUST SALARIES & WAGES 2-32-10-03-111 Gravel & Dust - Supervision 6,717 8,820 2-32-10-03-112 2,103 76.2 Gravel & Dust - Wages - Full-time 46,331 82,100 2;32-10-03-113 Gravel & Dust _- Wages - Special Pr. 35,769 56.4 3,700 3,700 2-32-l0-03-il4 Gravel & Dust -"Benefits " " y;*85 17,090 "975^5- "4~4T5— 2-32-10-03-115 Gravel & Dust - Wages - Seasonal 5,004 12,200 7,196 41.0 TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES 65,717 * 123,910 * 58,193 * 53.0 * GRAVEL & DUST CONTROL GENERAL 2-32- 10-03- 220 Miscellaneous Leases 1,758 2,800 1,042 2-32- 10-03- 531 Dust Control 62.8 144,023 154,000 9,977 2-32- 10-03- 532 Contract equipment 93.5 4,159 27,400 23,241 2-32- 10-03- 533 Grading Contracts 15.2 2-32- 10-03- 534 Plowing, Sanding & Salting_ 2-32- 16-03- 536 Gravel trucking" 240,672 26 5,200 24,528 2-32- 10-03- 537 Contract - Cty. Leduc ~§0. 8 2-32- 10-03- 545 Vehicle Rental 35,956 99,000 63,044 2-32- 10-04- 511 Crushing 36.3 199,799 312,000 112,201 2-32- 10-04- 512 Equipment Rental 64.0 2-32- 10-04- 545 Vehicle Rental TOTAL GRAVEL & DUST CONTROL GENERAL 626,368 * 860,400 * 234,032 * 72.8 * TOTAL GRAVELLING & DUST CONTROL 692,085 * 984,310 * 292,225 • 70.3 * ROAD CONSTRUCTION_ ROAD CONSTRUCTION SALARIES & WAGES 2-32-10-05-111 Construction - Supervision 23,681 30,870 2-32-10-05-112 7,189 76.7 Construction - Wages - Full-time 42,229 2-32^10-05-113 82,100 39,871 51.4 Construction^ jL_w§Ses_-_S£ecial Proj 1,494 2-32-16-05-114 3,300 1,806 45.3 Construction - Benefits "18,806* "" 38,160"' 2-32-10-05-115 Construction - Wages - Seasonal 19,354 "39T3"- 90,019 122,200 32,181 73.7 TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES 176,229 * 276,630 * 100,401 * 63.7 * ROAD CONSTRUCTION GENERAL 2-32-10-05-212 Mileage 9,041 15,000 2-32-10-05-511 Ditching /Drainage 5,959 60.3 6,403- 22,400 28,803 i 2-32-10-05-512 New Culverts 28.6 j2-32-10-05-513 2,000 2,000 New Construction 28,468 '2-32-10-05-514 64,000 35,532 44.5 Special Projects 52,751 12,000 40,751- 439.6 -< r^fPARr^f)/10^ 3 » "» ^ Fin«..olalLiCJlal ZZM TO DATE 1990 ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION REMAINING % BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET FUNDS USED 2-32-10-05-515 Engineering fees 10,053 31,600 2-32-10-05-516 21,547 31.8 Rebuilding 11,211 2-32-10-05-517 Hired Equipment 11,211- 259,962 356,300 2-32-10-05-518 Contract Projects 96,338 73.0 43,634 250,000 2-32-10-05-519 Land Acquisition 206,366 17.5 23,244 10,000 2-32-16-05-545 Vehicle Rental 13,244- 232.4 179;i38 259,500 2-32-10-05-546 Contract Projects 80,362~ 69.0 TOTAL ROAD CONSTRUCTION GENERAL 611,100 * 1,022,800 * 411,700 * 59.8 * TOTAL ROAD CONSTRUCTION 787,329 * 1,299,430 * 512,101 * 60.6 * R-W. SHOR SERVICES P.W. SHOP SERVICES SALARIES & WAGES 2-32-10-06-111 Shop - Supervision 32,153 2-32-i6-06-ii2 37,800 5,647 85.1 Shop - Wages - Full-time 101,216 2-32-10-06-113 Shop - Wages - Special Projects 138,800 37,584 72.9 2-32-10-06-114 600 600 Shop - Benefits 21,502 2-32-10-06-115 28,670 7,168 75.0 Shop - Wages - Seasonal 2,441 2,000 441- 122.1 TOTAL SHOP^ALARIES_&_WAGES_ 157,312 * 207,870 * 50,558 * 75.7 * SHOP SERVICES GENERAL 2-32- 10-06- 252 Building repairs and maintenance 3,899 2-32- 10-06- 259 12,600 8,701 31.0 Janitorial 3,650 2-32- 10-06- 274 5,300 1,650 68.9 Insurance _ 13,613 2-32- 16-06- 510 Utilities " 13,900 287 97.9 11,128 i5,960 2-32- 10-06- 511 Equipment parts and supplies 4,832 69.7 155,262 201,300 2-32- 10-06- 512 Communications 46,038 77.1 10,522 14,400 2-32- 10-06- 521 Fuel 3,878 73.1 136,599 200,000 2-32- 10-06- 522 Grease and oil 63,401 68.3 10,713 15,400 2-32- 10-06- 529 Small tools and safety 4,687 69.6 6,509 8,000 2-32- i6-06- 530 Transfer to Equip. Reserve 1,491 81.4 2-32- 10-06- 535 403,100' 403,100 Grader Blades 47,801 2-32- 10-06- 545 70,000 22,199 68.3 Vehicle Rental 9,301 6,900 2,401- 134.8 TOTAL SHOP SERVICES 408,997 * SHOP DEBENTURES 966,860 * 557,863 * 42.3 * 2-32-10-06-831 P. W. Shop Interest 28,618 2-32-10-06-832 28,620 2 100.0 P. W. Shop Principle 11,546 11,550 4 100.0 2-32-10-06-833 Equipment Interest 86,361 86,370 9 100.0 >.2-32-10-06-834 Equipment Principle 178,370 178,370 100.0 pr= r^- T fKtJPARBu 1 T 1 1/10/17" Financial Statement PAGE 17 M.D. OF BRAZEAU NO. 77 ^.— OPERATING REVENUE AND^ EXPENDITURE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED September 30, 1990 < TO DATE ACCOUNT NUMBER 1990 REMAINING % BUDGET DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET FUNDS USED TOTAL SHOP DEBENTURES 304,895 * 304,910 * 15 * 100.0 * TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS 3,774,483 * 5,444,600 * 1,670,117 * 69.3 * TOTAL LANDFILL OPERATIONS GENERAL .£ * TOTAL SANITARY LANDFILL OPERATIONS .0 * t%~~p"m% ™f- *«JpARLw 31/10 /71* 3 Financial Statement PAGE 18 M.D. OF BRAZEAU NO. 77 OPERATING REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED September 30, 1990 < TO DATE 1990 ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION REMAINING \ BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET FUNDS USED ENVIRONMENT TREATMENT SERVICES WATER TREATMENT St DISTRIBUTION WATER MAINTENANCE^ WATER MAINTENANCE SALARIES & WAGESES !2-41-10-01-111 Water - Supervision 10,755 14 ,230 <2-41-10-01-112 Water - Wages - Full-time 3,475 75.6 91 1 2-J1-10-01-113 ,300 1,209 7.0 Water - Wages_2_Special_Projects 1 ,300 2-4i-16-6i-ll4 Water - Benefits" ~ 1,300 1,842 2 ,966 " 2-41-10-01-115 Water - Wages - Seasonal "1,0SS 6375 1 ,300 1,300 TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES 12,688 * 21 ,030 * 8,342 * 60.3 * WATER MAINTENANCE GENERAL _ 2-41-10-01-201 Cynthia 78 ,000 2-41-10-01-202 Rocky Rapids 1 922 7.8 382 2-41-10-01-203 Lodgepole 5 ,000 4,618 7.6 562 ,000 2-41-10-01-207 Travel & Subsistence 1 438 56.2 827 2-41-10-01-208 Consulting Fees 1 400 573 59.1 437 2-41-16-61-545 437- Vehicle Rental" " "5; 797 6, 400 so3— W.T TOTAL WATER MAINTENANCE GENERAL 8,083 * 14, 800 * 6,717 * 54.6 * WATER DEBENTURES 2-41-10-02-831 Poplar Ridge- Interest 2;§28" 2-41-10-02-832 r, 530 9979 _ • Poplar Ridge - Principle 268 270 99.2 TOTAL WATER DEBENTURES 2,796 * 2, 800 * 99.9 * TOTAL WATER TREATMENT/DISTRIBUTION_ 23,566 * 38, 630 * 15,064 * 61.0 * SEWAGE TREATMENT €c COLLECTION SEWER MAINTENANCE SEWER - SALARIES & WAGES_ ;2-42-10-01-111 Sewer - Supervision 10,755 I2-42-10-01-112 14,220 3,465 75.6 Sewer - Wages - Full-time 287 i2-42-10-01-113 Sewer - Wages - Special Projects 1,300 1,013 22.1 |2-42-10-01-114 1,300 1,300 Sewer - Benefits 1,863 .2-42-10-01-115 2,900 1,037 64.2 Sewer - Wages - Seasonal 11 1,300 1,289 .9 > I tnlpARbu 13/10/x ' ] 1 i^1l" T "1- 1-^ Financial Statement PAGE 19 M.D. OF BRAZEAU NO. 77 OPERATING REVENUE ^D.EXPENDITURE_.FOR .THE. PERIOD ENDED September 30, 1990 < TO DATE ACCOUNT NUMBER 1990 REMAINING % BUDGET DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET FUNDS USED ...... — — TOTAL SEWER SALARIES 12,916 * 21,020 * 8,104 * 61.5 * SEWER MAINTENANCE GENERAL 2-42- 10-01-200 Sewer Charges Drayton Valley Agreet _16,548 2-42: 22,000 5,452 16-61-261 Lodgepoie "~ " " 1^60i 75.2 2-42- 10-01-202 4,6o6 2,399 40.6 Rocky Rapids 1,026 2-42- 10-01-203 Poplar Ridge 3,000 1,974 34.2 2-42- 10-01-204 Violet Grove 3,000 3,000 869 2-42- 10-01-205 Buck Creek 4,500 3,631 19.3 1,050 2-42- 10-01-206 5,000 3,950 21.0 Cynthia 103 2-42- 16-6i-208 3,000 _ 2,898 3.4 Consulting Fees " 437" 2-42- 10-01-211 Travel & Subsistence 437- 540 2-42- 10-01-545 Vehicle Rental 1,200 660 45.0 4,378 7,700 3,322 56.9 TOTAL SANITARY SEWER GENERAL 26,551 * 53,400 * 26,849 * 49.7 * TOTAL SANITARY SEWER OPERATIONS 39,467 * '4,«*u - 34,953 * 53.0 * SEWER DEBENTURES 2-42-10-01-831 Poplar Ridge Interest 29,075 29,080 5 2-42-10-01-832 100.0 Poplar Ridge.Principle 3,081 3,080 1 100.0 TOTAL SEWER MAINTENANCE GENERAL 32,155 32,160 * 5 * 100.0 * 2-42-10-02-831 Buck Creek - Interest 2-42-10-02-832 Buck Creek - Principle 11,260 11,260 2,510 2,510 2^42"-i6-63-83i Rocky Rapids - Interest 1,907 I,yio 3 2-42-10-03-832 Rocky Rapids - Principle 99.8 892 890 2- 100.2 2-42-10-04-831 Violet Grove - Interest 7,523 2-42-10-04-832 7,530 7 99.9 Violet Grove - Principle 1,116 1,110 6- 100.5 TOTAL SEWER DEBENTURES "ii,437~* 25,216 * 13,773 * 45.4 * TOTAL SANITARY SEWERS 43,593 * 57,370 * 13,777 * 76.0 * SANITARY LANDFILL ORERATIONS SALARIES & WAGES " 2-43-10-01-111 Landfill - Supervision 2,390 2-43-10-01-112 3,160 770 75.6 Landfill - Wages - Full-time 140 2-43-10-01-113 Landfill - Wages - Special Projects 1,900 1,760 7.0 400 400 2-43-10-01-114 Landfill - Benefits 807 3,740 2,933 21.6 J 1 f KtTFARBu 1/10/1/ Financial Statement PAGE 20 M.D. OF BRAZEAU NO. 77 0^A2^_REVEj^AND EXPENDITURE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED September 30, 1990 j « TO DATE 1990 ACCOUNT NUMBER REMAINING \ BUDGET DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET FUNDS USED i 2-43-10-01-115 Landfill - Wages - Seasonal 11,075 17,900 6,825 61.9 TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES 14,412 * 27,100 * 12,688 * 53.2 * LANDFILL OPERATIONS GENERAL j2-43-10-01-212 Mileage 400 I2-43-10-01-251 1,000 600 40.0 Drayton Valley Landfill Authority 117,712 119,400 j2-43-10-01-252 Cynthia, Landfill Maintenance 1,688 98.6 1,798 1,000 2-43-10-01-253 Lodgepole 798- 179.8 648 500 148- 2-43-10-01-254 Breton 129.5 2,800 4,800 2-53-i6-6i-255 Lindale 2,000 58.3 1,000 2-43-10-01-545 1,000— Vehicle Rental 1,141 500 641- 228.2 TOTAL LANDFILL OPERATIONS GENERAL 124,499 * 128,200 * 3,701 * 97.1 * TOTAL SANITARY LANDFILL OPERATIONS J.38,910 * 155,300 * 16,390 * 89.5 * TOTAL ENVIRONMENT TREATMENT 245,537 * 325,720 * 80,183 * 75.4 m )!== >ARtu ali/10/A/* Financial Statement PAGE 21 M.D. OF BRAZEAU NO. 77 >-- OPERATING REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED September 30, 1990 < TO DATE ACCOUNT NUMBER 1990 REMAINING % BUDGET DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET FUNDS USED FAMILY Sc COMMUINTY SURRORT SERVICES F.C.S.S. SALARIES & WAGES 2-51-10-00-110 F.C.S.S. Salaries & Wages 7,356 15,070 2-51-i6-66-li4 7,714 48.8 F.C.S.S. Benefits 157 2,416 "IT*sr ir^— TOTAL F.C.S.S. SALARIES & WAGES 8,113 17,480 * 9,367 * 46.4 * F.C.S.S. GENERAL 2-51-10- 00-211 Travel and subsistence 633 2,000 2-51-10- 00-212 Mileage 1,367 31.7 501 3,000 2-51-10- 00-213 Advertising 2,499 16.7 500 2-51-10- 00-214 Administration Levy 500 3,000 2-51-10- 00-215 Special Projects 20,000 2-51-10- 00-216 20,000 Memberships 50 5 2-5i-i6- 00-2i7 450 55- 112.2 Seniors Transportation 16,800 2-51-10- 00-229 Supplies 16,800 1,000 1,000 2-51-10- 00-230 Transfer to FCSS Reserve TOTAL F.C.S.S. GENERAL 1,639 * 46,750 * 45,111 * 3.5 * TOTAL F.C.S.'S. ADMINISTRATION" 9^752 * 64,"230 * 54,478 * 15.2 * PLAYSCHOOLS 2-51-10-00-245 Easyford Playschool 600 _2=51-10-00-250 Lpdgepole. Playschool 600 !2-51-16-66-255 Buck Creek Playschool 600 600 600 j 2-51-10-00-260 Lindale Playschool 600 600 2-51-10-00-265 Breton Playschool 600 800 !2-51-10-00-266 Drayton Valley Preschool 800 600 600 I 2-51-10-00-270 Insurance 1,700 1,700 TOTAL PLAYSCHOOLS 57500 * 5,500 * .0 * F.C.S.S. HOMEMAKER SERVICES HOMEMAKER SALARIES & WAGES 2-52-10-00-111 Homemaker - Salaries and Wages 3,950 24,000 2-52-10-00-114 20,050 16.5 Homemaker - Benefits 23 3,000 2,977 .8 TOTAL HOMEMAKER SALARIES & WAGES 3,973 27,000 * 23,027 * 14.7 * HOMEMAKER SERVICES GENERAL rr"~l£ARIr="l|/1Or"^l Fin .al outtxemeiii-- M - iD . OF SRAZESAU NO. 77 QglgATjNG_REyENy^AND EXPENDITURE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED September 30, 1990 < TO DATE 1990 ACCOUNT NUMBER REMAINING % BUDGET DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET FUNDS USED . 2-52-10-00-211 Travel & Subsistence 2-52-10-00-212 Mileage 500 500 1,252 3,000 2-52-10-00-215 Supplies 1,748 41.7 1,000 1,000 TOTAL HOMEMAKER SERVICES GENERAL _1,J!52 * 4,500 * 3,248 * 27.8 * TOTAL HOMEMAKER SERVICES 14,977 * 101,230 * 86,253 * 14.8 * HOME HELP SERVICES HOME HELP SALARIES & WAGES 2-52-10-00-310 Home Help - Salaries and Wages 269 5 ,000 2-52-10-00-312 Home Help - Benefits 4,731 5.4 800 800 TOTAL HOME HELP SALARIES & WAGES 269 * 5 ,800 5,531 * 4.6 HOME HELP SERVICES GENERAL 2-52-10-00-316 Mileage 1 ,500 1,500 TOTAL HOME HELP SERVICES GENERAL * 1 500 1,500 * .0 * TOTAL HOME HELP SERVICES'" 269 * 7 ,300 7,031 * 3.7 * CONTRIBUTIONS TO OTHER AGENCIES 2-53-10-00-210 D.V. Careline - 2-53-10-00-215 Breton Careline 2, 000 2,000 2. 000 2,000 TOTAL CONTRIBUTIONS TO OTHER AGENCY • 4, 000 4,000 * .0 * TOTAL F.C.S.S. 15,246 * * 112, 530 97,284 * 13.6 * - "*=*% r-—^ Financial statement PAGE 23 M-D. OF BRAZEAU NO. 77 OPE^TjNG^E^ENUE_ANp^EXPENDITURE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED September 30, 1990 TO DATE 1990 ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION REMAINING % BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET FUNDS USED MUNICIPAL PLANNING St DEVELOPMENT MUNICIPAL PLANNING COMMISSION ! 2-61-10-00-111 M.P.C. Members Honourarium 2,500 , 2-81-10-00-156 6,000 3,500 41.7 M.P.C. - Benefits 10 I 2-61-10-00-211 MPC - Travel & Subsistence ro~ 74 1,000 i 2-61-10-00-212 MPC - Mileage 926 7.4 . 2-61-10-00-221 MPC - Advertising 1,200 1,200 TOTAL MUNICIPAL PLANNING COMMISSION 2,584 * 8,200 * 5,616 31.5 DEVELOPMENT APPEAL BOARD i 2-61-20-00-111 D.A.B. Members Honourarium 378 ' 2-61-20-00-211 2,800 2,422 13.5 D.A.B. Travel & Subsistence 79 ;^-61-20-00-212 DAB - Mileage 800 721 9.8 216i-20-00-22i D.A.B. Advertiiihg i50 ~T50~ TOTAL DEVELOPMENT APPEAL BOARD 457 3,750 * 3,293 * 12.2 PLANNING SERVICES 2-61-30-00-111 Planning -Salary"and Wages' "23,520 3i,610 2-61-30-00-114 Planning - Benefits "8TO"50~ "7*74- 3,484 5,060 1,576 68.9 TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES 27,004 36,670 * 9,666 73.6 PLANNING SERVICES - GENERAL _ 2-61-30-00-211 Travel and subsistence 996 2-61-30-00-212 Mileage 2,000 1,004 49.8 740 . 2-61-30-00-214 900 161 82.2 Memberships and registrations 130 !2-61-30-00-215 Furniture and equipment 300 170 43.3 2-61-30-00-216 Vehicles - fuel 600 600 2-6i-30-6b-217 Vehicles - repairs 66 2-61-30-00-229 Supplies 310 ; 2-61-30-00-230 M.D. mapping 500 190 62.0 1,429 1,429- TOTAL PLANNING SERVICES 30,674 * 2-61-30-00-545 Vehicle Rental 40,970 * 10,296 * 74.9 76 3,200 3,124 2.4 TOTAL GENERAL SERVICES 3,746 * 7,500 * 3,754 * 49.9 TOTAL PLANNING SERVICES 76 * 3,200 " 3,124 * 2.4 r—^- .r-^g.. ...tJPARLu Jl/10/j.r® Financial Statement PAGE 24 M.D. OF BRAZEAU NO. 77 I ! OPERATING. REVENUE_AND^ EXPENDITURE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED September 30, 1990 •< TO DATE 1990 ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION REMAINING % BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET FUNDS USED ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 2-61-40-00-211 Travel and Subsistence 2,000 2-61-40-00-212 Mileage 2,000 400 2-61-40-00-215 Chamber of Commerce 400 5,448 5,500 2-61-40-00-220 Publications 52 99.1 15,000 15,000 TOTAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 5,448 * 22,900 * 17,452 * 23.8 * TOURISM 2761-50-00-210 Honourarium 2,300 3,000 700 76.7 2-61-50-00-214 Memberships and registrations 2-61-50-00-220 Action plan 5,000 347 2-61-50-00-221 Advertising 1,500 1,153 23.1 1,000 1,000 TOTAL TOURISM 2,647 * 10,500 * 7,853 * 25.2 * TOTAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT 41,886 * 89,520 * 47,634 * 46.8 * f^=* /^rr= -^arlT^ >/10,x tl t ••^*f ' ^ Financial Statement PAGE 25 M-D. OF BRAZEAU NO. 77 OPJBRATING REVENUE ANp„E^PENDITURE_FOR THE PERIOD ENDED September 30, 1990 S TO DATE 1990 ACCOUNT NUMBER REMAINING % BUDGET DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET FUNDS USED AGRICULTURAL SERVICE BOARD A.S.B. ADMINISTRATION SALARIES 2-63-10-00-111 A.S.B. Salaries_ 42,214 2-63-i0-00-ii4 55,620 13,406 75.9 A.S.B. - Benefits ' ~ """" 5,796 8,900 3,104 65.1 TOTAL A.S.B. ADMIN. SALARIES 48,010 * 64,520 * 16,510 * 74.4 * A.S.B. ADMINISTRATION GENERAL 2-63-10 00-211 ASB-Admin.-Travel & Subsistence 2,178 2-63-10- 00-212 9,400 7,222 23.2 ASB-Admin.-Mileage 756 2-63-10-•00-214 1,070 314 70.6 ASB-Admin.-Membership/Conference Fe 700 2-63-10- 00-221 2,795 2,095 25.0 ASB-Admin.-Advertising 1,033 2-63-10- 00-225 2,500 1,467 41.3 ASB-Admin.- Joint Programming 4,500 2-63-10- 00-253 4,500 100.0 ASB-Admin.rEguip/Furn_Repair/Maint. ..Ar228 1,700 2-63-i6- 00-254 ASB Vehicle fuel 472 72.2 2-63-10- 00-255 ASB-Admin.-Vehicle Repairs 397 2-63-10- 00-516 397- ASB-Admin.-Other Supplies 2,440 2-63-10- 00-545 1,500 940- 162.6 Vehicle Rental 15,167 13,145 2,022- 115.4 TOTAL A.S.B. AOMIMISTRATION.GBIIERAL. _28,398 * 36,610 8,212 * 77.6 * TOTAL A.S.B. ADMINISTRATION 76,408 * 101,130 24,722 * 75.6 * AG. SERVICE BOARD ?r.63-ip-oi-iii fl-S.B.-Members Honourarium_ 9,625 11,000 1,375 2-63-id-di-i2i A.S.B. Travel fit Subsistence 3,60i 87.5 2-63-10-01-122 5^400 1,799 66.7 A.S.B. Mileage 1,572 2-63-10-01-124 A.S.B. Conference Registrations 2,380 808 66.0 1,890 1,660 2-63-10-01-125 A.S.B. Conventions & Tours 230- 113.9 3,289 6,300 2-63-10-01-156 A.S.B. Benefits 3,011 52.2 227 200 27- 113.4 TOTAL A.S.B. BOARD' " 20,203 26,940 *~ 6,737 * 75.0 • A.S.B. PLANT INDUSTRY SALARIES & WAGES 2^63-10-02-114 ASB General - Benefits 884 2-63-16-02-115 2,740 1,856 32.3 ASB General ~ Wages - Seasonal' 17,428 17,ioo 328- 101.9 TOTAL SALARY & WAGES 18,312 * 19,840 * 1,528 * 92.3 * 2-63-10-02-211 Mileage v .. . _. •Is «••* .-PARE.- a/io,x. * Financial statement PAGE 26 M-D. OF BRAZEAU NO. 77 OPERATING REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED September 30, 1990 TO DATE 1990 ACCOUNT NUMBER REMAINING % BUDGET DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET FUNDS USED A.S.B. PLANT INDUSTRY GENERAL 2-63-10 -02-310 Mileage 6,407 5,400 I2-63-10-•02-311 Joint Programming (Alta. Ag.) 1,007- 118.6 i 2-63-10'-02-312 Roadside Seeding 1 ,030 5 ,400 4,370 l2-63-id; 02-3i3 Beaver Flood Control 19.1 "12 ,863 25 ,000 ! 2-63-10- 02-316 Small equipment rental 12,137 5r:3 ~ 48 100 2-63-10- 02-317 Roadside Mowing 52 48.0 22 ,685 30 000 2-63-10- 02-318 Spot Spraying 7,316 75.6 1 ,720 10 000 '2-63-10- 02-319 A.S.B. Tour Expenses 8,280 17.2 899 1 500 I2-63-10-02-320 Cemetery maintenance 601 60.0 56 300 2-63-io- 02-321 Travei & Subsistence 244 18.7 50 ;2-63-10- 02-322 50 Shelterbelt Program 575 2-63-10- 02-325 Demonstration plots 575- 889 6 000 2-63-10- 02-335 5,111 14.8 Support contributions 1 015 6 500 5,485 15.6 TOTAL PLANT_ INDUS_TRY GENERAL 48 187 * 90, 250 * 42,063 * 53.4 * TOTAL PLANT INDUSTRY 66 499 * 110, 090 * 43,591 * 60.4 * A.S.B. ANIMAL INDUSTRY A.S.B. ANIMAL INDUSTRY SALARIES 2-63-10-03-111 Animal Industry Salaries 909 1,580 671 2-63-10-03-114 Benefits 57.5 28 80 52 34.6 TOTAL ANIMAL INDUSTRY SALARIES 937 1,660 * 723 * 56.4 * A.S.B. ANIMAL INDUSTRY^GENERAL 2-63-10-03-211 Travel & Subsistence 134 60 2-63-10-03-212 74- 223.0 Mileage 2,961 150 2,811- 1973.8 TOTAL ANIMAL INDUSTRY GENERAL 3,094 * 210 * 2,884-* 1473.56 TOTAL ANIMAL INDUSTRY 4,031 * 1,870 * 2,161-* 215.6 * 2-63-10-03-411 Roadside Mowing 2-63-10-03-412 Mowing Hamlets, Lagoons & Other CONSERVATION &DEVELOPMENT 2-63-10-04-808 CASCI 1,500 1,500 2-63-10-04-810 FDRP/SCAP 5,000 5,000 TOTAL CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT 6,500 6,500 * .0- rnrfPAREu J^O/IO^X/ Financial Statement M.D. OE* BRAZEAU NO. VV >- OPERATING REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED September 30, 1990 -< TO DATE jACCOUNT NUMBER 1990 REMAINING % BUDGET DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET FUNDS USED 2-63-10-05-900 CONTRIBUTION TO CAPITAL 12,000 12,000 i 2-63-10-05-910 Reclamation Officer 4,824 4,100 724- 117.7 TOTAL AGRICULTURAL SERVICES 171,966 * 262,630 * 90,664 * 65.5 * ARL- ^/1CrrM f=^% '^t "^3 il' ^ Financial stalatement PAGE 28 M.D. OF BRAZEAU NO. 11 S— °?-EMgING REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED September 30, 1990 TO DATE 1990 ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION REMAINING \ BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET FUNDS USED RECREATION REGIONAL RECREATION SALARIES & WAGES _ 2-72-10-00-113 Recreation - Wages - Special Proj. 2-72-10-00-114 Recreation - Benefits 2-72-10-00-115 Recreation - Wages - Seasonal 230 230 4,500 4,500 RECREATION GENERAL 2-72-10-00-211 Travel and subsistence 2-72-10-00-212 Mileage 500 500 75 2-72-10-00-220 600 525 12.5 Bus To Swim 4,160 2-72-10-00-221 Advertising 4,160- 2-72-10-00-229 Office supplies_ _ 300 300 TOTAL RECREATION GENERAL 4,235 • 6,130 * 1,896 * 69.1 * CONTRIBUTIONS 2-72-10-00-235 Contributions to Municipalities 42,389 2-72-16-00-240 Contrib. to community organizations 42,000 389^ 100.9 id,000 io;6oo TOTAL CONTRIBUTIONS 42,389 • 52,000 * 9,611 * 81. 5 * 2-72-10-00-750 Drayton Valley Arena Agreement TOTAL CONTRIBUTIONS .0 * TOTAL RECREATION 46 ,624 * 58,130 * 11,507 * 80.2 * E»ARKS PARKS SALARIEST WAGES j 2-72-10-01-111 Parks - Supervision 6 782 2-72-10-01-112 8,890 2,109 76.3 Parks - Wages - Full-time 520 j2-72-10-01-113 2,700 2,180 19.3 Parks - Wages - Special Projects 17 ,324 2=72-10-01-114 22,000 4,676 78.8 Parks - Benefits _ 172 2-72-i6-01-li5 . 2« 5,580 3L408_ 38.9 Parks - Wages -Seasonal 580 i, 1,300 280- 121.6 TOTAL PARKS SALARIES & WAGES 28, 378 * 40,470 • 12,092 * 70. 1 * PARKS GENERAL ARL- M/10, . ~f ~f ' J statement • Finandlal si PAGE 29 M.D OF BRAZEAU NO. 11 QPBgftTIHG REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED September 30, 1990 TO DATE 1990 ACCOUNT NUMBER REMAINING % BUDGET DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET FUNDS USED 2-72-10-01-301 Easyford Park 1,953 5,100 2-72-10-01-302 Lodgepole Park 3,147 38.3 85 900 2-72-10-01-303 Willy West Park 815 9.5 21,520 17,300 ;2-72-10-01-304 Modeste Creek Park 4,220- 124.4 180 1,000 !2-72-10-01-311 Travel & Subsistence 820 18.0 600 600 2z72-i0-0i-545 Vehicle rental 8,478 5,900 27578""- T43T7" TOTAL PARKS GENERAL 32,216 * 30,800 * 1,416-* 104.6 * TOTAL PARKS 60,594 * 71,270 * 10,676 * 85.0 * ?^*g- -r««|-- ''^p rT73pARLrrS/io': Financial statement T PAGE 30 M. D OF BRAZEAU NO. 11 OPERATING REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED September 30, 1990 TO DATE 1990 REMAINING ACCOUNT NUMBER BUDGET DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET FUNDS USED LIBRARY SERVICES BOARD HONOURARIA 2-74-00-00-111 Honouraria 1,705 4,000 __ 2,295 42.6 TOTAL BOARD HONOURARIA 1,705 * 4,000 * 2,295 * 42.6 * GENERAL BOARD EXPENSES iJz24r0°-0°-2io Special Projects 500_ 500 !2-74-00-06-2ii travel & Subsistence 500 5o6— ; 2-74-00-00-212 Mileage 200 200 TOTAL GENERAL EXPENSES 1,200 * 1,200 * CONTRIBUTIONS TO LIBRARIES ! 2-74-00-00-215 D.V. Library 9,376 29,380 2-74-00-00-220 Breton Library 20,004 31.9 7,039 7,200 161 2-74-00-00-223 TRANSFER TO CRC CULTURE RESERVE 97.8 2-74-00-00-225 Yellowhead Regional Library 36,159 36,200 41 99.9 TOTAL C"6NtRi§UTIONS'TO~LIBRARiES 52;574 * 72;780 * ~267206~*" "72 72-*" TOTAL LIBRARY SERVICES 54,279 * 77,980 * 23,701 * 69.6 * f^=s •-^~. 'r^^m VnarflRED »oflO/i/ T financial Statement PAGE 31 M.D. OF BRAZEAU NO. 11 OPERATING REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED September 30, 1990 < TO DATE 1990 ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET REMAINING 4 BUDGET FUNDS USED FISCAL. SERVICES REQUISITIONS — MUNICIPAL LEVY -2z§*-10-09-73L Alberta Planning Fund 42,463 40 000 2,463- 2-84-20-00-749 Meridian Foundation " L 106.2 2-84-20-00-750 Leduc Foundation 2-84-20-00-760 Brazeau Foundation 64,969 65,000 31 100.0 TOTAL REQUISITIONS-MUNICIPAL 107,432 * 105,000 * 2,432-* 102.3 * REQUISITIONS — NON MUNICIPAL LEVY" 2-85-10-00-747 School Foundation Requisition 1,027,668 2,055,340 1,027,672 50.0 2-85-20-00-747 Twin Rivers School Division 3,713,798 4,942,300 i,228,503 75.i 2-85-30-00-747 Drayton Valley R.C.S.S. Sep.- Rural 60,000 80,'ooO 20,000 75.0 lr85r40r00_-747 Drayton Valley R.C.S.S. No. Ill 100,337 1331800 33,463 75.0 TOTAL REQUISITIONS NON-MUNICIPAL 4,901,803 * 7,211,440 * 2,309,637 * 68.0 * TOTAL REQUISITIONS 5,009,235 * 7,316,440 * 2,307,205 * 68.5 * HISCE. BANK CHARGES 2-86-00-00-751 Interest Expence (Short Term Loan) 2-86-00-00-752 Bank Service Charges TOTAL MISCE. BANK CHARGES • * .0 TOTAL FISCAL SERVICES • * .0 OTHER SERVICES ....RE SERVES 2-97-00-00-761 Reserve General Assessment 65,000 65,000 2-97-00-00-762 Contingencies -Contrib. to Capital 405 750 405,750 2-97-00-00-763 Contribution to Building Reserve 2-97-00-00-764 Contingencies™Add to Oper. Reserv 'so'iooo""" 50,000 TOTAL RESERVES - 520,7 50 * 520,750 * ALLOWANCES r^^ JAREl 10/. r J ' 1 %ina..uJil sTaSmenu PAGE 32 M.D- OF BRAZEAU NO 1 1 OPERATING REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED September 30, 1990 TO DATE 1990 REMAINING % BUDGET ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET FUNDS USED 2-97-00-00-765 Allowance Uncollectible Taxes 11,759 20,000 8,241 2-97-00-00-767 58.8 Alice Uncollectible Mobile Home Lie 26,749 500 26,249- 2-97-00-00-930 Contributions to Capital 5349.82 TOTAL ALLOWANCES 38,508 * 20,500_*_ 18,008-* 187.8 * TOTAL EXPENDITURES 10,281,208 * 15,810,020 * 5,528,812 * 65.0 * SURPLUS/DEFICIT 4,662,448-* 4,662,448 * .0 * PREPAREDr^L..7TI90710/17 Financial Statement PAGE 33 M.D. OF BRAZEAU NO. 11 > CAPITAL FINANCES ACQUIRED/APPLIED FOR THE PERIOD ENDED September 30, 1990 < TO DATE 1990 REMAINING % BUDGET ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET FUNDS USED CAPITAL FINANCES ACQUIRED TOTAL GENERAL ADMINISTRATION CONDITIONAL CAPITAL GRANTS 3-72-00-00-840 Secondary Highway 761 15,944- 15,944 3-72-00-00-842 Rocky Rapids Lagoon - Environment 4,500- 37,500- 33,000- 12.0 3-72-00-00-843 Pesticide Site - Environment 3-72-00-00-844 Hamlet Streets Assistance - Transp. 37,500- 37,500- 3-72-00-00-845 Environment Grants_ 1/685,250-_ 1,685,250- TOTAL CAPITAL CONDITIONAL GRANTS 20,444-* 1,760,250-* 1,739,806-* 1.2 ! 3-99-10-01-000 Revenue From Debentures 329,000- 329,000- i! 3-99-10-02-000 Contribution From Operation 405,750- 405,750- ;' 3-99-10-03-000 Contributions From Capital Reserves 619,j|50-_ 619,250- 3-99-i6-04-b66 Sale of fixed"Assets 22;300- 22;"500- i 3-99-10-05-000 Contributions From Agricultural Opr 12,000- 12,000- TOTAL CAPITAL FINANCES ACQUIRED 20,444-* 3,148,550-* 3,128,106-* .7 7H3hREiT7$/10 / *i ~r- inancial Statement PAGE 34 M.D. OF BRAZEAU NO. 11 >- CAPITAL FINANCES ACQUIRED/APPLIED FOR THE PERIOD ENDED September 30, 1990 TO DATE 1990 REMAINING ACCOUNT NUMBER % BUDGET DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET FUNDS USED CAPITAL FINANCES APPLIED GENERAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES General Administration FURNITURE 4-12-10-01-660 Administration Office Furniture 4-12-10-01-661 Director's Offices 4^.12-10-01-662 . Executive,Offices 4-12-16-61-663 Additional" Chairs " " "' 4-12-10-01-664 Filing Cabinets 4-12-10-01-665 Computer Facilities TOTAL FURNITURE * * OFFICE EQUIPMENT* - 4-12-10-02-700 Administration Office Equipment 44,812 45,500 688 98.5 4-12-10-02-702 Upgrade Telephone System 4-12-10-02-703 Miscellaneous Equipment 4^12-10-02-704 Photo Copier 4-12-10-02-705 Paper Shredder ~ — TOTAL OFFICE EQUIPMENT 44,812 * 45,500 * 688 98.5 * COMPUTER UPGRADE 4-12-10-03-710 Computer Hardware 6,400 '"' 12*7200" 5,800 52.5 TOTAL COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 6,400 * 12,200 * 5,800 52.5 BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS 4-12-10-04-301 Executive~0ffices 4-12-10-04-302 Vault 4-12-10-04-303 Architect Fees Council 4-12-10-04-304 Building Renovations fsfr to Resv. 50 000 50,000 4-12-10-04-305 Admin./Public Works Facilities 200,'ooo 200,000 TOTAL BUILDING "IMPROVEMENTS ~* ~ 250";600~*- ""2""50,00 TOTAL GENERAL ADMINISTRATION 51,212 * 307,700 * 256,488 * 16.6 * ENFORCEMENT *~*i r^§ «..»~f»RREL jJ'IO/i/ financial Statement PAGE 35 M.D. OF BRAZEAU NO. 11 C_AP_ITAL FINANCES ACQUIRED/APPLIED FOR THE PERIOD ENDED September 30, 1990 TO DATE 1990 ACCOUNT NUMBER REMAINING % BUDGET DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET FUNDS USED 4-21-10-01-120 Enforcement Vehicles 4-21-10-01-130 Enforcement Equipment TOTAL ENFORCEMENT FIRE PKoTECTIQR ' 4-23-10-00-160 Contribution To Breton Fire Hall 4-23-10-00-165 Fire Equipment TOTAL FIRE PROTECTION r—J ' ^AREr %10f ^IrindJal S^ 1 PAGE 36 M.D- OF BRAZEAU NO. 11 CAPITAL FINANCES ACQUIRED/APPLIED FOR THE PERIOD ENDED September 30, 1990 TO DATE .... 1990 REMAINING % BUDGET I ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET FUNDS USED _... PUBLIC WORKS EQUIPMENT 4^32- 10-01- 101 Graders 4-32' io-oi- i02 t)7 Crawler Tractor 4-32- 10-01- 103 D3 Crawler Tractor 4-32- 10-01- 104 1/2 Ton Trucks (2) 4-32- 10-01- 105 Tandem Truck 4-32- 10-01- 106 4 Yard Loader 4-32- 10-01- 107 Tandem/Sander ~4-32: 16-6i- 168 Used Truck & Trailer 4-32- 10-01- 109 Bobcat Trailer 4-32- 10-01- 110 Medium Duty Trailer 4-32- 10-01- 111 Transit & Level 4-32- 10-01- 120 Public Works Vehicles 99,061 78,800 4r32- 10-01- 130 20,261- 125.7 Public Works Equipment 337,995 355,350 4-32: 16-61- 146 Pubiic Works Office Equipment 17,355 95.1 TOTAL EQUIPMENT 437,057 434,150 * 2,907-* 100.7 * --- PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING & YARDS 4-32-10-01-650 Public Works Buildings i4-32-10-01-651 Lodgepole Storage Yard 3,639 5,000 1,361 72.8 TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS BLDGS & YARDS 3,639 5,000 * 1,361*" 72.8 * 4-32-10-02-301^ Air Tank _ _ 4-32-10-02-302 Gas Detector P.W. OFFICE EQUIPMENT 4-32-10-03-610 Public Works Office Furniture ^l32r10-03-611 Photo Copier 4-32-10-03-630 Plan Filing Cabinet TOTAL P.W. OFFICE EQUIPMENT • .0 " RADIO EQUIPMENT 4-32-10-04-632 Radios/New Trucks & Improvements TOTAL RADIO EQUIPMENT * .0 * P.W. SHOP EQUIPMENT — mREL _J^10/ "****$- 'inancial Statement PAGE 37 M.D. OF BRAZEAU NO. 11 >-" CA."L?TAL FIHAMCga[.ACQUIRED/APPLIED FOR THE PERIOD ENDED September 30, 1990 TO DATE ACCOUNT NUMBER 1990 REMAINING % BUDGET DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET FUNDS USED ( 4-32-10-05-634 Miscellaneous Equipment TOTAL P.W. SHOP EQUIPMENT .0 * TOTAL PUBJ.IC WORK^^QUIPMENT 440,696 * 439,150 * 1,546-* 100.4 * TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL PROJECTS 4-32- 10-06--001 Lodgepole Relamping 4-32- 10-06 -002 Rocky Rapids Drainage 2,149 50,000 47,851 4-32- 10-06- 003 Goliad Road Erosion _ 4.3 40,000 40,000 4-32- 10-06 -004 Ski Hill Erosion " 20,000 20,000 4-32- 10-06 005 McGinn Pit Erosion 2,222 20,000 17,778 4-32- 10-06 006 Hamlet Street Lighting 11.1 4-32- 10-06 007 Land (S.R. 620) & Hisce. 20,958 4-32- 10-06- 008 Entrance Signs 25,000 4,042 83.8 4^32- 10-06- 009 Hamlet Streets Assistance 50,000 50,000 4-32- 16-06- 010 Misce. Contributions 4-32- 10-06- Oil Land & Utility Relocation lOu,66b 100,000 4-32- 10-06- 012 Secondary Highway 761 30,000 30,000 15,944 15,944- TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS 41,273 * 335,000 * 293,727 * 12.3 * WATER CAPITAL PROJECTS 4-41-10-06-001 Rocky Rapids Water 60 4-41-10-06-002 Cynthia Water 543,000 542,940 .0 4-41-10-06-003 Lodgepole Water Station 925,000 925,000 35,000 35,000 TOTAL WATER CAPITAL PROJECTS™ 60 * i, 5b3,"666 * 1,502,940 * .0 * SANITARY SEWER CAPITAL PROJECTS 4-42-10-06-001 Rocky Rapids Sewer 6,437 ir42r10-06-002 Lodgepole Video Inspection 325,000 318,563 2.0 4-42-16-06-003 Cynthia Sewer 4-42-10-06-004 Buck Creek Sewer 195,000 195,000 5,200 5,200 4-42-10-06-005 Rocky Rapids Flush Video 7,200 7,200 TOTAL SANITARY SEWER CAP. PROJECTS 6,437 * 532,400 * 525,963 * 1.2 * r-*l r*^l ^' " ^ * r="r=l- T L:.3AREif"7Jlao/r! rinancjfal Statement M.D. OF BRAZEAU NO. W CAPITAL FINANCES ACQUIRED/APPLIED FOR THE PERIOD ENDED September 30, 1990 TO DATE ACCOUNT NUMBER 1990 REMAINING % BUDGET DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET FUNDS USED PLANNING £c DEVELOPMENT 4-61-10-01-120 Planning & Development Vehicles TOTAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT .0 AGRICULTURAL SERVICE BOARD j4-63-10-01-120 A. S. B. Vehicles IJ-63-10-01-130 A. S. B. Equipment 1,670 I4-63-l0-6i-660 A. S. B. Office Furniture 1,670- !4-63-10-01-710 A. S. B. Office Equipment r4-63-10-01-715 TRANSFER TO ASB CAPITAL RESERVE 4-63-10-01-716 Pesticide Container Site 716 20,000 19,284 3.6 TOTAL AGRICULTURAL SERVICE BOARD 2,386 * 20,000 * 17,614 * 11.9 Harei 10/ %inailancfal Statement "1 PAGE 39 M.D. OF BRAZEAU NO. 11 >-- CA?.«^.f?MAMCBSJlC^UIRBD_/APPJ,IBD_POR J_H September 30, 1990 < TO DATE 1990 ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION REMAINING % BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET FUNDS USED RECREATION 4-72-10-00-101 Drayton Valley Arena Agreement i4-72-10-00-105 Willy West Park 5,517 7,800 4-72-10-00-107 Lodgepole Park Upgrade 2,283 70.7 .4-72-10-60-168 Misce. Land " 3,500 3,500 TOTAL RECREATION 5,517 * 11,300 * 5,783 * 48.8 * t*m*f 1' «f...._p!!WSWl.. fKisrPARLu »D/10/17 Financial Statement PAGE 40 M.D. OF BRAZEAU NO. 11 /""~ .CAPITAL FINANCES ACQUIRED/APPLIED_FOR^HE PERIOD ENDED September 30, 1990 TO DATE 1990 ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION REMAINING % BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET FUNDS USED CAPITAL RESERVES 4-99-10-00-101 Equipment/Fleet 4-99-10-00-102 Tsfr to Capital Reserves TOTAL CAPITAL~RESERVEi3 ~" TOTAL CAPITAL FINANCES APPLIED 547,581 * 3,148,550 * 2,600,969 * 17.4 * J r r To - The way to a - more market responsive, cost effective grain handling and transportation system. AGRICULTURE Office of the Minister 1BP1r Liberia AGRICULTURE 131 >G04 Legislature Building, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T5K 2B6 403/427-2137 September 24, 1990 1 Dear Sir: "FREEDOM TO CHOOSE" I have pleasure in presenting for your consideration "Freedom to Choose", a proposal for a prairie-wide change in the method of payment of the Crow Benefit under the Western Grain Transportation Act (WGTA). The Agricultural Transportation review process provided an invaluable forum for examination and comment on a wide range of previously advanced proposals but could not provide for the development of a solution within the context of the general principles guiding the review. This proposal has been developed and rigorously tested against these principles and has been made public to facilitate the development of a solution to the inefficiencies and distortions evident in the current applications of the WGTA. Close attention has also been paid to the general thrust and likely outcomes of the Uruguay Round of the Multilateral Trade Negotiations under the GATT. It is becoming more certain that transportation subsidies targetted at export commodities will be challenged by members of the international trading community and we risk reductions and elimination of WGTA payments unless changes are made. It has always been the view of the Alberta Government that a prairie wide solution to the method of payment issue is the optimal objective. In consequence it is appropriate to fully explore and strive for an acceptable solution which can benefit the individual farmers within the prairie region. The current system is clearly deficient in this regard and, no matter what the final outcome is for GATT negotiations, inappropriate for the future. .../2 I r t - 2 - •pi SSI Should you wish to discuss further some of the detail and background to the proposal please contact Mr. Ken Beswick, Chairman, Planning Secretariat, Alberta Agriculture, J. G. O'Donoghue Building, #301, 7000 - 113 Street, Edmonton, Alberta, T6H 5T6, telephone 1-800-661-0056 (toll free). Yours truly, Ernie Isley Minister of Agriculture cc: Honourable Shirley McClellan Associate Minister pp m r r r |pi r r GRAIN HANDLING AND TRANSPORTATION FREEDOM TO CHOOSE r r r August, 1990 r m r r CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 INTRODUCTION 5 GRAIN HANDLING AND TRANSPORTATION POLICY OBJECTIVES 6 Pi CROW BENEFIT BUY OUT 7 Background Elements ofa Buy Out P Options Resulting from a Buy Out REVISION OF LEGISLATION AND REGULATIONS 12 •m Current Situation Revised Rate Structure Results ofRevised Rate Structure IP Other Regulatory Changes i MAJOR EFFECTS OF PROPOSAL IMPLEMENTATION 16 m SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 20 ' APPENDIX A: WESTERN GRAIN TRANSPORTATION ACT/ FEDERAL-PROVINCIAL REVIEW PRINCIPLES 22 •pn APPENDIX B: DETAILED EFFECTS OF PROPOSAL IMPLEMENTATION 24 • pi pi 01 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AmongstWestern Canada's objectives for spend the Crow Benefit, to which they are change in federal agricultural policy, those entitled. Therefore, the proposal presented in regarding grain handling and transportation this document focuses on a buy out ofthe are ofprimary importance. In this document Crow Benefit and on revisions to the Western Alberta Agriculture identifies grain handling Grain Transportation Act (WGTA) rate and transportation policy objectives structure and to regulations which hamper appropriate forWestern Canada, and presents efficiency in the current grain handling and a proposal on the approach required to achieve transportation system. those objectives. Objectives Crow Benefit Buy Out Using as a framework various principles guiding the current federal-provincial The Federal Government is committed to domestic agriculture policy reviews,* itis paying the railways the Crow Benefit — submitted that Western Canada's objectives approximately $720 million per year—into for grain handling and transportation policy perpetuity. It is proposed that the Federal Government buy out this commitment from are: the historical beneficiaries ofthe Crow 'SP 1. To remove the distortion from domestic Benefit, i.e., landowners within the Canadian grain prices. Wheat Board (CWB) designated area. 2. To direct support measures toward being It is proposed that registered Federal production and trade neutral and Government bonds be used as the buy out conducive to environmental sustainability. mechanism. The bonds, redeemable at the end 3. To establish legislative and regulatory ofa 15 year buy out period, along with an structures which provide for the annual cash stream, would be issued to the progressive evolution ofa more market landowners. The Federal Government's responsive, cost effective grain handling financial commitments would be: and transportation system. 1. To make an annual or lump sum 4. To develop legislative and regulatory contribution to a bond redemption fund, structures which improve Canadian securing the face value ofthe bonds to be farmers' ability to compete in the global paid to the bondholders at the end ofthe marketplace. 15 year buy out period. The face value would offset the anticipated decline in land While itis recognized that minorimprove prices resulting from the buy out. ments in grain handling and transportation efficiency can occur without a change in the 2. To provide an annual cash stream to the method ofpayment, no improvement ofany bondholders over the 15 year period to significance can occur until farmers face the replace the benefits they currently accrue impact ofpaying full transportation costs, through payment ofthe Crow Benefit to until they have the freedom to choose the railways. The bond could be structured transportation modes for their product, and to provide larger cash streams in the first until they have the freedom to decide how to five years, thus providing adjustment funds until the benefits ofimproved *See Appendix A for the federal-provincial review transportation efficiencies begin to show principles upon which Western Canada's objectives up in the form ofreduced freight rates. have been built. Following the buy out period, returns to rental charges would decline to reflect the new the bondholder from investing the face productive capacity of the land. value of the bond would replace the annual cash stream. Revision of Legislation and A 15 year buy out through payment of the net Regulations present value ofthe Crow Benefit The second component ofthe proposal focuses (approximately $7.2 billion) would not require on a revision ofthe WGTA rate structure, as funds beyond the Federal Government's well as on regulatory changes required both to present commitment. As well, the Federal promote efficiency in the grain handling and Government's Crow Benefit commitment transportation system and to provide price would cease at the end of the 15 year buy out signals to transport users. period. Therefore, this component ofthe proposal provides a "sunset clause" on the Although the current distance-based rate Federal Government's Crow Benefit structure would be retained, the proposal commitment while furnishing a financial suggests a premium charge to users ofhigh offset to farmers as they take on payment of cost branch lines. As well, the railways would the full cost ofrail transportation. be provided greater freedom to negotiate incentive rail rates for the movement ofgrain. The average bond entitlement across the CWB This would provide them with greater ability designated area would be approximately $86 to reduce costs and enable them to pass cost per acre. Individual entitlements would be savings to farmers. As an incentive to increase calculated on the sum ofthe landowner's cost saving measures, the railways also would arable acres, adjusted for both productivity be provided an opportunity to retain cost and distance to port, multiplied by the average savings over a longer time period. In entitlement per acre. The source ofarable exchange, grain shippers' contributions to the acreage data would be municipal taxation railways' constant costs would be reduced to records. more accurately reflect contributions from Through the issue of a bond, a farmer's asset other railway traffic. values would be protected. More important, the farmer would have a number ofchoices Effects of Implementation with regard to the disposition ofhis An economic analysis was conducted to entitlement. The bond could be traded on a examine the impacts that would have occurred recognized securities exchange and, therefore, had the proposal been in effect in Western could be used to reduce debt or cover urgent Canada between 1980 and 1988. farm financial needs. Or, the farmer could Supplementary studies examined other choose to invest the capital value ofhis bond potential benefits. The results of the studies in options such as diversification in crops and indicate that not only Western Canada, but all in livestock. Alternately, the farmer could ofCanada, would have enjoyed substantial simply accept the annual cash stream from economic benefits. A summary of the major the bond to pay for all or part of the increased benefits follows. freight costs he faces. Similar to other changes imposed by Summary of Benefits from governments, such as taxation rules, Proposal Implementation expropriations and trucking regulations, contracts and rental arrangements would Objective 1: To remove the distortion have to be revised by landowners in order to from domestic grain prices. reflect the increase in transportation costs payableby renters. As with all such assets, p* Benefit: Enhancement, expansion and Benefits: Rural communities would have a increased competitiveness ofthe livestock and more secure and viable economic base due to other value added sectors would result from the agricultural diversification which would the reduction in the domestic price ofgrains occur in response to the proposed changes. If and oilseeds. the proposal had been in effect in Western Canada between 1980 and 1988: Objective 2: To direct support measures toward being production and trade —A $765 million to $834 million increase in neutral and conducive to environmental Canada's annual GDP and the addition of sustainability. 3,500 - 6,300jobs to the annual employment base would have resulted. Benefits: Provincial offset programs would not be needed to offset the deleterious effect ofthe —In response to lower feed costs, Western current method ofpayment, saving $80 Canada's beefcow herd would have grown million to $90 million per year. by 11 percent or 280,000 head while sow numbers would have increased by 5 percent A buy out could move the Crow Benefit from or 18,000 sows. (The primary market for being considered a trade-distorting subsidy to this increase in livestock production would being a permitted or minimally disciplined be the expanding markets in the Pacific policy. Ifconsidered an adjustment program, Rim and western U.S.A. Therefore, the the buy out could also be excluded from increase would not be detrimental to the countervailing duty. U.S. quotas should not be livestock industry in Central and Eastern affected as a result of the provisions of the buy Canada.) out bond. —Western Canada's total annual livestock Environmental sustainability would be revenue would have increased by 17 promoted since increased forage production percent or $589 million. would reduce soil degradation and reduce the —Western Canada's aggregate annual grains incentive to expand grain production onto and oilseeds revenue net ofrail marginal lands and wetlands. transportation costs would have increased Objective 3: To establishlegislative and by 2 percent or $105 million. regulatory structures which provide for 'IP —Western Canada's annual primary the progressive evolution ofa more agriculture sector revenue would have market responsive, cost effective grain risen by 8 percent or $695 million. handlingand transportation system. Benefit: By accelerating the pace of branch Conclusion line rationalization, improving the utilization By adopting the changes proposed in this 'P of the grain hopper car fleet, and increasing document, the Federal Government would productivity, net savings in transportation provide Western Canada with tremendous costs of over $100 million per year could be economic development potential. As the expected ten years after implementation of the entrepreneurial spirit ofWestern Canada's proposal. In 20 to 30 years, these savings agriculture and food industry realized this would likely double. potential, the entire Canadian economy would benefit through increased employment and Objective 4: To develop legislative and economic growth. regulatory structures which improve Canadian farmers' ability to compete in To the individual Western Canadian farmer the global marketplace. and his community, implementation ofthe proposal would provide increased farm income r stability through diversification. Implementation would also offer the farmer freedom to choose among the alternative modes oftransportation in securing access to his chosen market, and freedom to choose how he uses the Crow Benefit. Control and responsibility for decisions in resource allocation, production and marketing would be returned to the farmer, while allowing him to base his decisions on the returns from the market and on a more stable international trading environment. •m •p\ pi ?pi •pj 'pi tpi INTRODUCTION ipSl A federal-provincial review ofCanadian The current mandate ofthe Transportation domestic agriculture policieswas initiated by Committee does not extend to making the federal and provincial ministers of recommendations on agricultural PI agriculture in August 1989 at Prince Albert, transportation policynor does it extend to the Saskatchewan. Agricultural transportation development ofproposals to change existing policies were identified as a component for policy. However, the principlesguidingthe PI review. The terms ofreference and the reviews overall as well as those specifically principles guiding the overall review process guiding the Transportation Committee review were made public in January 1990. At the provide a framework which governments can Tpl same time a committee was appointed and use to establish their own objectives for future mandated to review and examine issues for agricultural transportation policy. In this change in agricultural transportation policies, document Alberta Agriculture identifies grain legislation, regulations and programs. The handling and transportation policy objectives Transportation Committee's current mandate appropriate for Western Canada, and presents ended on June 30,1990, although the review a proposal on the approach required to achieve process will continue until the end of those objectives. December 1990. pti jpi 'jp pi ipv GRAIN HANDLING AND TRANSPORTATION POLICY OBJECTIVES Built upon the framework provided by the —The payment ofthe Crow Benefit on principles being used in the overall selected commodities and products r federal-provincial reviews andin the discriminates against all other commodities agricultural transportation policy review (see grown in Western Canada, e.g., forages and Appendix A), Western Canada's grain silage. r handlingand transportation policy objectives —The perpetual nature ofCrow Benefit are: payments as a commodity-based input 1. To remove the distortion from domestic subsidy has undesirable trade implications grain prices. such as risk ofcountervail actions, as well as undesirable consequences for land use 2. To direct support measures toward being patterns and soil conservation objectives. production and trade neutral and conducive to environmental sustainability. —The distributional effects ofthe Crow Benefit payments and the attendant 3. To establish legislative and regulatory legislative, regulatory and institutional structures which provide for the systems have been capitalized and any progressive evolution ofa more market change would have differential effects on responsive, cost effective grain handling existing and future participants. and transportation system. —The regulatory structure ofthe grain 4. To develop legislative and regulatory handling and transportation system structures which improve Canadian provides little incentive or flexibility to farmers' ability to compete in the global reduce system costs through increased marketplace. efficiency and competition. These objectives address much ofthe The following proposal puts forward solutions controversy surrounding how the current on how to remove these impediments, thereby grain handling and transportation system achievingWestern Canada's grain handling negatively affects the competitiveness and and transportation policy objectives. efficiency ofWestern Canadian agriculture. Impediments to achievement ofthis competitiveness and efficiency are: —Payment ofthe Crow Benefit to the railways has distorted and raised the domestic price ofgrain and has retarded expansion, competitiveness and diversification inWestern Canada's agriculture and food industries. —Compensation programs in place to offset the grain price distortion created by the Crow Benefit payment to the railways have not only added to provincial deficits, but have come under the scrutiny ofour trading partners. r CROW BENEFIT BUY OUT Background Columbia and the AlbertaWheat Pool developed a proposal for the Crow Benefit to The method ofpayment ofthe Crow Benefit be paid directly to producers in the two has been a contentious issue since the late provinces. The committee's proposal was 1970's. At the time ofthe promulgation ofthe subsequently supported by the memberships WGTA in 1983, the Western Canadian farm ofthe AlbertaWheat Pool and other Alberta community was divided over whether the farm organizations. Crow Benefit payment should be made to the farmer, to the shipper, or to the railway. Continuing to feel the impediments imposed Parliament was sufficiently concerned about by the current method ofpayment and the method ofpayment issue that in response realizing the benefits ofa direct-to-producer to pressure from the official opposition payment, the agriculture sectorsin Alberta (Progressive Conservative), a clause directing and B.C. have encouraged pursuance ofa that the method ofpaymentbe reviewed was Western Canada-wide change. Because the included in the Act. current mandate ofthe federal-provincial Transportation Committee does not extend to This review, led by Judge Gordon C. Hall, the development ofproposals for policy reported that the method ofpayment was change, the following is submitted. inhibiting diversification inWestern Canada. In a later study, the Grain Transportation Elements of a Buy Out Agency (GTA) supported the findings ofthe Hall Committee and also noted changes in the The method ofpayment portion ofthis WGTA which would be beneficial to the grain proposal is based upon a Federal Government handling and transportation system. buy out ofthe Crow Benefit by way ofa bond applied to ownership offreehold arable land Despite government and industry's realization pi within the CWB designated area. The ofthe benefits that would be brought by the following considerations form the substance of suggested changes, they were notinstituted. this buy out: In response, the Government ofAlberta in 1985 introduced a financial assistance 1. Reallocation ofthe Crow Benefit from the program to offset the artificially inflated price railways to producers would effectively Alberta farmers pay for feedgrain supplies for remove the distortion ofdomestic grain their livestock. Within two years the other prices currently resulting from the western provinces had independently selective application ofthe Benefit to instituted similar programs. Although these export quantities ofeligible grains. Wl programs nullified the negative economic However, reallocation alone would not impact resulting from the current method of provide for neutrality in production or payment, they did not correct the problem. trade flows as the payment would likely be British Columbia cancelledits program in a subsidy on production and sale ofeligible 1989, but the Prairie Provinces have found it grains. Neutrality in production and trade necessary to continue their offset programs. could be provided for by elimination of payments ofthe Crow Benefit. At their Parksville Conference in 1988, the premiers ofWestern Canada endorsed 2. Without financial offsets to the elimination provincial freedom ofchoice in the method ofCrow Benefit payments, the costs of used to pay the Crow Benefit. In 1989, a joint adjustment to industry and system committee comprised ofrepresentatives from participants would exceed the previous the Governments ofAlberta and British annual value ofBenefit payments. Therefore, a financial offset to the costs of Federal Government could deposit adjustment would be required. $226.6 million annually into a bond redemption fund for 15 years, or it could 3. Redistributional effects would arise from deposit $1,724 billion up front at the elimination ofthe Crow Benefit and beginning of the buy out. provision offinancial offsets. Anyfinancial BPl offset should be decoupled and be directed —The cash stream could be a uniform series to industry participants, that is, the final ofannual payments valued at $720 million, recipients of redistributional effects of or it could be front end loaded in the initial changes to the method ofpayment. In past, years of the buy out with decreasing the annual payments of the Crow Benefit payments thereafter. The advantage of the have been capitalized into the value of latter option, a staged payment, is that the agricultural (more precisely, arable) land, extra funds during the initial years of the jpl so itis the landowner who would be the buy out would provide landowners with the final recipient of redistributional effects of dollars necessary to make desired elimination. This suggests that the adjustments to their businesses. Any landowner should be the recipient or further adjustments requiredin the middle beneficiary ofoffset payments although the and final years of the buy out would be obligation to provide offsets to the costs of provided by the cost savings arising from lH adjustment and redistributional effects changes to the WGTA and certain should cease within a predetermined regulations. Figure 1 depicts the Federal period. Government's commitment under an annual contribution of$226.6 million to a Bond Characteristics bond redemption fund along with payment ofan annual cash stream to bondholders. —It is proposed that the Federal Government provide interest-bearing bonds to —After the 15 year buy out period, the landowners. The total value ofthe bonds Federal Government's commitment to would be equivalent to the net present paying the Crow Benefit would end. value ofthe current Crow Benefit Thereafter, the bond holder would be t commitment of$720 million per year. For responsible for managing the redeemed example, at a discount rate of10 percent, principle value of his bond. (Ifthe bond the net present value of this perpetual holder decided to reinvest the principle, the commitment would be $7.2 billion. interest would continue to provide a cash stream equivalent to the Crow Benefit.) —The bonds would bearinterest annually, thus providing an annual cash stream to Beneficiaries bond holders, helping to offset the increase in transportation costs producers would —Beneficiaries ofthe bond would be the pay following this proposed change in the owners offreehold arable land within the method of payment. The cash stream from CWB designated area as of a specified date the bond would replace the present Crow before the start ofa buy out. Benefit payments made to the railways. —Each beneficiary would receive his —The bonds would be redeemed at the end of entitlement in the form ofa 15 year a 15 year period. The Federal Government federally registered bond. Terms of the would have options on how to commit funds bond would include that the cash stream to a bond redemption fund to ensure the was to be paid within a marketing year, $7.2 billion is available to the bond holders and that the bond was not redeemable prior at the end ofthe buy out period. For to maturity. example, at a 10 percent discount rate, the r—1 FIGURE 1 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT COMMITMENT UNDER A BUY OUT OF THE CROW BENEFIT USING A $7.2 BILLION BOND REDEEMED BY BOND HOLDERS AFTER YEAR 15. $7.2 BILLION 1,200 BOND <1,000 - REDEEMED I BY 9 800 - BONDHOLDERS CO AFTER 5 600 $8!»0IV $7D0M $41 3 M YEAR 15 CO § 400 u_ CASH STREAM PMC TOBONDHOLCEFS O $227 M PER YEAR CO 2 PLUS INTEREST 3 200 BOND REDEMPTION FUND = $227 M PER YEAR 100 h 0 J I L 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 YEAR Annual cash stream paid to bondholders is equivalent to the present commitment Federal commitment ends after year 15. —The bond would be listed on a recognized 0.55/0.75 0.73 Productivity Adjustment Canadian securities exchange. As such, Factor bond holders would have the option of —The entitlement would also be adjusted by holding the bond to maturity, selling the a distance factor to reflect differences in bond in the open market, assigning the rail transportation costs across the bond to reduce debt, or assigning the bond designated area. The base rate scale set to support increased borrowings. forth in the WGTA would form the basis for the distance adjustment factor calculation. Determination ofEntitlement IP Each landowner would be assigned a base —The definition and establishment ofacres of rate according to the average base rate for arable land within the CWB designated the crop district in which his land is area would be based on classifications used located. This base rate would then be in municipal tax assessments, and would divided by the average ofthe base rates at be made up of: all delivery points in the CWB designated • freehold title farmland classified as area (calculated to be about 4.70). dryland arable, and For example: • freehold title farmland classified as 1. Lethbridge has a base rate of4.77 in the irrigation land, multiplied by 1.48 of 1990/91 crop year. dryland arable to reflect production capability. (The 1.48 factor for irrigation 4.77/4.70 = 1.01 Distance Adjustment land is a reflection that, on average, Factor irrigation enhances the productivity of the 2. North Battleford has a base rate of5.17 in soil by 48 percent.) the 1990/91 crop year. —The entitlement would be adjusted by a factor reflecting differences in soil 5.17/4.70 = 1.10 Distance Adjustment productivity across the CWB designated Factor area. Municipal tax assessments provide 3. Brandon has a base rate of3.73 in the productivity ratings for parcels of land 1990/91 crop year. based on soil, agroclimatic and topograph ical characteristics. Each quartersection 3.73/4.70 = 0.79 Distance Adjustment would be assigned a productivity rating Factor based on the province's municipal tax —The mean entitlement per acre would be assessments. The quarter section's established prior to implementation of the productivity rating would then be divided buy out. by the weighted mean productivity rating in the CWB designated area (calculated to The formula for the mean entitlement per acre be roughly 0.75 relative to the most would be: productive land in the province). NPV = E For example: (A+I)xPAFxDAF where: 1. Black soils typically have a productivity rating of0.90. NPV = bond value of $7.2 billion, 0.90/0.75 = 1.2 Productivity Adjustment A = sum ofall dryland arable acres Factor (approximately 81.206 million acres), 2. Brown soils typically have a productivity I = sum ofall irrigated acres (1.380 rating of0.55. million acres) x 1.48, 10 PAF =s average productivity adjustment For example: factor of1, 1,000Acre Annual Redeemed Value DAF = average distance adjustment factor Farm Cash Stream at 15 Years ofl, Lethbridge E = mean entitlement per acre. (250 acres Year 1-5: $ 8,384 $ 71,017 under Year 6-10: $ 6,904 The calculation for the mean entitlementper irrigation) Year 11-15:$ 4,093 acre, then, is: North Battleford 1PI Year 1- 5: $13,402 $113,520 E = $7,200,000,000 = $86 Year 6-10: $11,037 (81,206,000 + (1,380,000 x 1.48) x 1 x 1 Year 11-15:$ 6,543 Brandon Therefore, the mean entitlement per acre for Year 1- 5: $ 8,021 $ 67,940 r the CWB designated area is approximately Year 6-10:$ 6,605 $86 per acre. Year 11-15:$ 3,916 —Individual entitlement would be calculated on the sum ofa landowner's arable acres Options Resulting from a Buy Out multiplied by his land's productivity Through the issue ofa bond, a farmer's asset adjustment factor, distance adjustment values would be protected. More importantly, factor, and the mean entitlement per acre. Individual entitlement would be paid to the the farmer would have a number ofchoices with regard to the disposition ofhis beneficiary in the form ofa bond. entitlement. The bond could be traded on a The formula for the individual entitlement recognized securities exchange and, therefore, would be: could be used to reduce debt or cover urgent farm financial needs. (If, for example, the (AA + II)xPAFxDAFxE = AE implementation date would have been August where: 7,1990, landowners could have sold their bonds on a recognized securities exchange at AA = sum ofthe landowner's dryland arable an estimated 95 percent ofthe face value of m u acres, their bonds. A tradeable bond gives the = sum ofthe landowner's irrigated acres landowner the option ofselling the bond at x 1.48, any point in time at either a small discount or PAF = productivity adjustment factor, premium, depending on market conditions = distance adjustment factor, * DAF prevailing on that day in the bond market.) E = mean entitlement per acre Or, the farmer could choose to invest the (approximately $86/acre), m ^ capital value ofhis bond in options such as = individualentitlement. diversification in crops and in livestock. Alternately, the farmer could accept the annual cash stream from the bond to pay for all or part ofthe increased freight costs he faces. (Details ofthe economic, social and environmental impacts ofa buy out are contained in Appendix B.) 11 REVISION OF LEGISLATION AND REGULATIONS Current Situation non-Board grains. Elevator companies have little say about how cars will be 1. Under the current grain handling system, allocated for train runs, and the railways farmers pay handling costs through tariffs are not involved to any great degree in the charged by individual grain companies on allocation ofcars to individual country grain deliveries. At the same time, there is points. Shippers cannot augment their an element ofcross-subsidization in the official allocation with cars they have handling system in that the revenues acquired privately. generated in the port terminal system are used to offset losses in the inland primary 5. The Federal Government and the elevator system. The resulting artificially Governments ofAlberta and low tariff for primary elevation reduces the Saskatchewan provide a large portion of incentive for producers to bypass the the hopper car fleet to move grain. primary elevator system by using producer 6. Railways can offer incentive rates to cars or for the system to construct high shippers but use ofthose rates has been throughput (low per tonne cost) facilities. restricted bythe notification period It also restricts competition in the required (seven months) and the WGTA provision ofprimary elevator services. recosting mechanism. The annual volumes 2. Grain transportation costs are established which have been moved under incentive every four years by the National rates (under 200,000 tonnes) and their Transportation Agency (NTA) and are impact on delivery patterns have been indexed annually according to inflation relatively small. and anticipated volumes to be moved by 7. Incentives offered by the railways for greater the railways. The indexed costs are efficiency in the transportation ofgrain are averaged between the railways, and that available only for a maximum offour years average is used to establish freight rates under the current quadrennial costing based on mileage to port. These rates procedures. guarantee sufficient revenues for the railways to cover their costs and provide a 8. Cost savings resulting from the elimination return on investment. ofprimary elevators or railway branch lines are reflected in elevation and freight 3. Under the Western Grain Transportation tariffs. The current system offers little Act, payment ofthe freight rate is shared incentive for individuals to take steps to by the shipper and the Federal reduce system costs. In most cases, Government. Because a farmer pays only a individuals mustincur additional expenses fraction ofthe rate, he may be unaware of to reduce system costs while the savings the total cost ofmoving his grain from his are shared by all users. This sharing ofall rail line. As well, the Canadian Wheat savings prevents individuals from being Board pays only a fraction ofthe additional adequately rewarded for taking steps to rate charged when it crosshauls grain. The lower system costs. costs ofhauling Board grain to ports other than the ones designated for individual 9. The existing railway freight rate structure, train runs increased to $58 million in based on average system-wide costs, tends 1987/88 from $16 million in 1983/84. to mask the cost ofindividual elements in the grain handling and transportation 4. The car allocation process is handled by the system. Trucks are prevented from CWB for Board grains and the GTA for 12 competing with the railways because ofthe 9. The costs associated with the Churchill line low rail rate paid by farmers. would be removed from the cost base. 10. The rate taper that occurs above 1,200 Revised Rate Structure miles would be eliminated so that the rates The objective ofproposing a change in the charged for longer distance hauls would WGTA rate structure is to provide farmers more closely approximate costs. with price signals that reflect the relative In order to encourage producers to find their costs ofvarious services. These signals would lowest cost transportation mode, a change in allow farmers to make informed choices when the annual rate setting process and the determining how best to ship their grain. manner in which rail rates are applied in It is proposed that a revised rate structure Western Canada must occur. have the following features: It is proposed that the rate structure continue to be based on the mileage from each delivery 1. The freight rate would continue to be calculated on the basis ofrailway variable point to port. Total volume-related variable costs and distance to port. costs and a portion ofthe line-related variable costs would be divided by the projected 2. The shipper would pay the full rate for all tonnage to establish the base rate scale. movements, including crosshauls. The remaining portion ofthe line-related 3. Trucks would be enabled to compete with variable costs would be assigned directly to railways for export and domestic branch lines in a manner which differentiates movements. high cost branch lines from low cost branch 4. Railways would be given greater freedom to lines. These costs would be added to the rate institute incentive rates and to reduce charged to move grain from high cost branch costs. lines. Under such a rate structure, farmers would pay a greater share ofthe cost 5. Differential charges for high cost branch associated with moving grain offthe branch lines would be imposed upon users to lines they use. reflect a portion ofthe higher cost of shipping from those points. Branch line The line-related costs for maintaining the abandonment would be facilitated. Churchill line would be removed from the cost 6. The railways would be allowed to keep base. It is submitted that the rail line is not grain-specific productivity savings for an used exclusively for the purpose ofexporting extended period oftime. In return for grain and, therefore, the costs should not be being allowed to keep those productivity borne by grain shippers. Ifthe Federal savings, grain shippers' contributions to Government believes the Churchill line is the railways' constant costs would be required for strategic reasons or as a supply reduced to more accurately reflect the port for the Arctic, it should provide separate contribution levels ofother railway traffic. funding for its maintenance. 7. The railways would be responsible for the Under the current WGTA, the railways offer acquisition ofall additional hopper cars incentive rates to shippers. These lower rates needed. are intended to encourage shippers to move grain in a manner that reduces railway costs 8. Demurrage would be charged on hopper cars by shipping larger volumes from a single point to encourage better utilization ofcars. or loading more cars in a short period oftime. Cars returned quickly would receive However, the cost savings gained by the dispatch. railway through these incentive rates are factored out ofthe WGTA freight rate at each 13 four year recosting. This not only denies the crop year. The time lag between application railways their cost savings but negates their and (ifaccepted by the NTA) implementation ability to continue to offer incentive rates ofthe incentive rate hinders the railways' since factoring the savings into the recosting ability to compete. It is therefore proposed process results in reduced rates for all that the railways be given the ability to apply producers. and discontinue incentive rates on short notice. To provide the railways with a means to offer incentive rates under a revised rate structure, The proposed changes to the rate structure are it is proposed that they be allowed to retain based on the principle that grain farmers who the benefits ofgrain-specific productivity move their product efficiently should not have improvements for a longer period oftime. to share their cost savings with other shippers. Having to share their savings with The WGTA currently provides for a 20 all otherWestern Canadian farmers provides percent supplement to the railways' little, ifany, return for their efforts and offers volume-related variable costs to cover grain w them little incentive to transport their grain shipping's share ofthe railways' constant more efficiently. Farmers must be given the costs. Between 1984 and 1988, however, the opportunity to know the cost ofeach part of contribution level for both railways averaged the system and must have the opportunity to 25 percent — significantly greater than both lower costs as their circumstances permit. the level specified in the legislation and that contributed by non-grain traffic. In exchange Results of Revised Rate Structure for being allowed to capture the gains from productivity improvements for a longer time The above rate structure changes would period, it is proposed that the legislated reduce the freight rate paid by farmers who contribution to the railways' constant costs be deliver to those main line delivery points reduced to be more reflective ofthe levels of offering incentive rates. It would also increase other traffic. rates on low volume branch lines. The intent ofthese changes would notbe simply to By allowing the railways to retain some cost redistribute rail charges, but to provide a price savings, they would be rewarded for lowering signal to producers and thereby facilitate a costs. At the same time, shipping costs would move toward a more market responsive and be reduced, allowing farmers to take competitive system. These changes would advantage ofincentive rates. allow those who improve the efficiency ofthe system to benefit yet would also allow those Incentive rates are generally available for multi-car shipments from a specific point who wish to continue using high cost parts of within a specified time period or for elevators the system to pay for their maintenance. IP able to meet minimum annual shipping volumes. Shippers unable to obtain incentive Other Regulatory Changes rates at their existing delivery points would The proposed changes to the WGTA are one have the option oftrucking their grain to step towards a lower cost grain transportation points offering a lower freight rate. It would system. However, with some other generally be in farmers' interest to take adjustments, the pace ofchange and the advantage ofsuch rates ifthe savings extent ofbenefits could be greatly increased. exceeded the additional costs to haul to the The other areas requiring change include car alternate points. allocation, the CWB contract system and the Under the WGTA, the railways must submit CWB pooling ofSeaway costs. their incentive rate proposals to the NTA seven months prior to the beginning ofthe pn 14 Car Allocation CanadianWheat Board Contract System The current system of car allocation, whether based on export sales or on a weighted average To better co-ordinate the movement ofBoard of inland deliveries, does not promote efficient grains under the current car allocation movements since itis difficult to obtain block system, it is proposed that the CWB train-sized allocations. To facilitate efficiency contracting system of acquiring grain be in the short term, the car allocation system expanded to include wheat. should be modified to allow elevator companies at the larger, more efficient loading Pooling ofSeaway Costs and facilities to receive 18, 50 or 100 cars. In order Crosshauling Grain to assemble these larger shipment volumes, The Canadian Wheat Board pools the cost of tm elevator companies would have to be given the ability to switch their total car allocation additional freight for crosshauling grain as between individual train runs. well as the costs oftransporting grains through the St. Lawrence Seaway system. New rail car purchases are currently the These pooling issues can best be dealt with responsibility ofthe major railways. The GTA separately after the method of payment has has predicted the need for up to 9,000 new been changed, and the most efficient possible jpH hopper cars to be acquired by the year 2000 at transportation system has been designed. a cost of $720 milHon. At the same time, under the current car allocation system, there is no economic incentive for shippers to acquire cars. It is therefore proposed that car allocation procedures be altered to facilitate the purchasing or leasing ofadditional cars by shippers. 15 MAJOR EFFECTS OF PROPOSAL IMPLEMENTATION Ifthe proposal put forward in this document The information in the summary has been were implemented, the effects on Western derived from a number ofsources, including Canadian agriculture would be evolutionary economic analyses which examined the and gradual, but far reaching. Following is a impacts that would have occurred had the buy summary ofthe major effects implementation out, revised WGTA rate structure and other would have on the primary agriculture sector, regulatory changes been in effect between the value added sector, employment and GDP, 1980 and 1988. Most ofthe analyses were trade policy, rural communities, the grain conducted by consultants contracted by handling and transportation system, offset Alberta Agriculture. programs, and environmental sustainability. A detailed explanation ofthe impacts is provided in Appendix B. SUMMARY OF MAJOR EFFECTS PrimaryAgriculture Sector Prices (Historical Analysis, 1980 -1988) -Price distortion would have been removed, promoting market-based decisions. -Local elevator price for Board grains would have declined by the difference between the current Federal Government share ofrail freight charges and the cost savings arising from the introduction ofmore flexibility in the WGTA. -Off-Board feedgrain prices would have declined by approximately $12 to $15/tonne. -Non-Board and off-Board grain prices might have declined by the same amount as the prices for Board grains, depending on market conditions. -In response to the decreased feedgrain price, calf prices would have risen by approximately $4.00 per hundredweight. Annual Crop Production/Revenue (Historical Analysis, 1980 -1988) -Wheat production would have declined by 7 percent or 1.45 million tonnes. -Barley production would have declined by 10 percent or 1.0 million tonnes. -Oats production would have increased by 4 percent or 84,000 tonnes. -Canola production would have increased by 5 percent or 190,000 tonnes. -Flax production in Manitoba would have increased by 7 percent or 35,000 tonnes. 16 r —Grain-derived revenue would have increased by 2 percent or $105 million, inclusive of the compensation paid in those years and the efficiency gains from the revised WGTA rate structure. Annual Livestock Production/Revenue (Historical Analysis, 1980 -1988) —Beefcow herd would have increased by 11 percent or 280,000 head. —Feeder exports would have declined. —Inventories offeeder cattle would have risen by 25 percent or 450,000 head. —Sow numbers would have risen by 5 percent or approximately 18,000 sows. —Total livestock revenue would have increased by 17 percent or $589 million. w\ Primary Agriculture Sector Revenue (Historical Analysis, 1980 -1988) —Western Canada's annual agriculture sector revenue would have increased by $695 million or 8 percent. Asset Values —Arable land prices would have to decline by an amount greater than the value ofthe individual's bond before any loss would occur. —Cultivated land rental rates would decline in accordance with the decreased crop market returns. Summary ofEffects: Control and responsibility for decisions in resource allocation, production and marketingwouldbe returned to the farmer. Value Added Sector —Cost ofgrain as an input would decline. —Higher valued crops which are typically processed domestically would increase in supply. —Livestock for processing would increase in supply. —From the above, higher throughput and cost savings would enhance the sector's competitiveness in the global market. For example, estimates for Alberta indicate cost savings of: $6 million per year for canola crushers, $1.5 million per year for malsters, $7 million per year for millers, and $2.6 million per year for industrial milk producers. Employment and GDP Employment (Historical Analysis, 1980 -1988) —An additional 3,500 to 6,300 jobs would have been created in Canada. is Gross Domestic Product (Historical Analysis 1980 1988) -A $765 million to $834 million increase would have occurred in Canada's annual GDP. 17 Summary ofEffects: Significant increase in the expansion, competitiveness and diversification ofthe agriculture and food industries. Trade Policy GATT -The Crow Benefit subsidy could move from being considered a trade-distorting subsidy to being a permitted or minimally disciplined policy. U.S. Trade Law -Ifthe buy out were considered to be an adjustment program, the agriculture sector could be excluded from countervail. CUSTA -U.S. quotas should not be affected by the provisions of the buy out bond. Rural Communities -The proposed changes would neither accelerate nor reverse the current trend ofconsolidation ofservices into larger rural centres. -Increased commercial trucking and the appearance and enhancement ofsmall scale industry would promote the viability ofrural communities. -The size ofpayment embodied in a bond would facilitate adjustment in the agriculture sector by providing for retirement. Lower land prices would facilitate entry into the industry. Grain Handling and Transportation System Productivity -The greater flexibility given to the railways and increased competition should increase the rate of productivity gains for moving grain. Increased efficiency should reduce cost by $35 million to $40 million annually in ten years. This is in addition to pil the cost savings that would be achieved from current trends in productivity improvement. Branch line Abandonment -Removal of30 percent ofgrain-dependent branch lines, rather than the 10 percent predictedin the current trend, would result in incremental cost savings of 20 percent or $18 million annually in ten years. This is in addition to the cost savings that will be achieved from current trends in abandonment. Commercial Trucking •As a result ofthe increased branch line abandonment, the net increase in trucking costs would be $11 million annually after ten years. 18 Hopper Car Purchases -Improved utilization of hopper cars and less marshalling in rail yards would eliminate the need for purchaseof7,000 cars as currently determinedbythe GTA. Over a 10 year period this would provide annual savings of $46 million. Alberta and Manitoba Crosshauls -Under the proposed rate structure, CWBcrosshauls from Alberta to Thunder Bay and Manitoba to Vancouver would be greatly reduced. Savings of $29 milHon would accrue to the producers delivering to CWB pool accounts. Grain Cost Base -There is little justification for having Churchill in the cost base for grain freight rates. Removal of the line- related costs alone would reduce costs to farmers by $5 million per year. Elevator Consolidation -A number of small elevators would be replaced by in larger facilities, enhancing system efficiencyand increasing capacity to clean grain inland. Improved margins in the primary collection system would be used to replace capital plants; no immediate savings to shippers would occur. Summary ofEffects: Provision ofsubstantial flexibility in the grain handlingand transportation system would result in savings in excess of$100 million annually for grain shippers within ten years. These savings are beyondthose that would result from current trends. Productivity Savings $ 35-$40 million Branch Line Savings $ 18 million Increased Trucking Costs $ 11 million jpi Decreased Hopper Car Purchases $ 46 million ReductionofCrosshauls (Alta., Man.) $ 29 million Elimination ofChurchill Costs $ 5 million Total Annual Savings in Ten Years $122 million Offset Programs -Removal of the domestic price distortion would eliminate the need for provincial offset programs. Environmental Sustainability —Some marginal lands would be returned to pasture. —Increased forage production would reduce soil degradation. —The incentive to expand grain production onto marginal lands and wetlands would be reduced. 19 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS The Federal Government's present method of development potentials for Western Canada. paying the Crow Benefit is a deterrent to the For example, ifthe proposal had been in expansion, diversification and competitiveness operation over the 1980 to 1988 period, the ofthe Western Canadian agriculture and food increase in Western Canadian annual grains industry. As well, the present WGTA rate sector revenue would have been $105 million. structure and other regulatory rigidities in the Expansion in the livestock sector would have grain handling and transportation system resulted in an increase in Western Canadian inhibit the progressive evolution ofthe system annual livestock revenue of$589 million. in becoming more market responsive and cost Consequently, overall Western Canadian effective. primary agriculture industry revenue would have risen approximately $695 million The proposal presented in this document annually over the period studied. addresses these issues. First, it is proposed that the Federal Government buy out the In addition to gains in the primary agriculture Crow Benefit through issuance ofregistered industry, the overall Canadian economy would bonds to the owners ofarable land in the CWB have benefited. A rise in annual employment designated area. The bonds, to be redeemed figures by 3,500 to 6,300 jobs and an increase after 15 years, would provide an annual cash in annual Gross Domestic Product of$765 stream to the bondholders to offset their million to $834 million would have occurred having to pay the full cost of grain between 1980 and 1988 ifthe proposal had transportation. been implemented. Second, the proposal focuses on a revision of A buy out could move the Crow Benefit the WGTA rate structure and on other subsidy from being considered a regulatory changes required both to promote trade-distorting subsidy to being a permitted efficiency in the grain handling and or minimally disciplined policy. A buy out transportation system and to provide price could also be excluded from any countervailing signals to transport users. Although the duty ifit were considered an adjustment current distance-based rate structure would program. Furthermore, U.S. import quotas be retained, a premium charge for users of should not be affected by a buy out. These high cost branch lines is promoted. The benefits would provide a more secure trading regulations controlling the use ofincentive environment in which farmers could make rates would be changed to provide greater production and marketing decisions. freedom in their negotiation. The railways would also be provided an opportunity to Through implementation of the proposal, the retain cost savings for an extended period of benefits accruing to the Canadian economy time. A further change would involve reducing would provide rural communities with a more grain shippers' contribution levels so they secure and viable economic base. As well, the more accurately reflect the contribution levels environmental sustainability ofWestern of other railway traffic. With other changes to Canadian agriculture would be enhanced regulations such as those involving the car through the return of some marginal lands to allocation procedure and the CWB contracting forage production. system, the pace ofchange and the extent of To the Western Canadian and Canadian benefits could be greatly increased. economies, implementation of the proposal Studies have shown that adoption of these would provide substantial economic changes would provide tremendous economic development potentials, enhancing economic growth and the number of individuals 20 growth and the number ofindividuals employed To individual farmers and their communities, more stability in theirincomes and employment base would be provided through diversification and a more stable international trading environment. A cost effective and less regulated grain handling and transportation system would enhance Western Canadian farmers' competitiveness in the international market. Most importantly, r the changes proposed in this document would allow farmers freedom to change on the basis ofmarket signals and freedom to choose among alternative modes oftransportation to move their products to the market oftheir choice. r 21 /$w APPENDIX A WESTERN GRAIN TRANSPORTATION ACT/ FEDERAL-PROVINCIAL REVIEW PRINCIPLES The Western Grain Transportation Act The review ofagricultural transportation, (WGTA), passed on November 17,1983 and undertaken initially by an appointed taking effect on January 1,1984, provided for: committee and to be completed by June 30, 1990, is mandated to review and examine —A Federal Government commitment to the issues relating to the WGTA. The issues are cost oftransporting grain; specified but not necessarily limited to: —The limiting ofthe future size ofthe —Method ofpaying the Crow Benefit government commitment through a sharing ofcost increases by grain producers and • phase out payments with or without a government, and limitation ofthe bond or annuity, government commitment to the amount of • on-going payments to producers, grain moved in the 1981/82 crop year; • revised safety net programs. —The government contribution to the cost of —Options contributing to reduced costs and moving grain being paid directly to the improved efficiency ofthe grain handling railways; and and transportation system with or without —The replacement ofthe statutory grain a change in the method ofpayment. rates by a rate scale established by the —Amendments to the WGTA and other Canadian Transport Commission based on legislation or regulations. grain moved over various mileages. The review and examination is being guided Amendments to the Act, effective August 1, by the following general principles, as outlined 1985, principally provided for a tally in the Agriculture Canada document entitled adjustment mechanism to facilitate payment "Growing Together": adjustments between government and shippers as a result ofimperfect forecasting of • more market responsiveness, amounts ofcrop to be moved. The 31.5 million • greater self-reliance in the agri-food sector, tonne volume limit to the government • a national policy which recognizes regional commitment was removed. diversity, and Ancillary events since January 1,1984, have • increased environmental sustainability. been the Hall Committee inquiry into the In addition, the Transportation Committee is method of paying the Crow Benefit, the review being guided by the principles proposed for the ofthe WGTA by the Grain Transportation review ofCanada's agricultural transportation Agency, the introduction ofvariable rates in policies which is due for completion by the end the 1987/88 crop year, the administrative of1990. These principles are: adjustments in freight rates paid by the producer in the crop years 1987-89, and the —Canada's agricultural transport programs federal-provincial review ofagricultural should be sensitive to the regional diversity transportation policies, issues and programs ofCanada's agri-food industry, while initiated in December 1989. recognizing that there is national interest in such programs. These programs should be reviewed in terms oftheir implications 22 across the country, notjust in a region where the transport program operates. —Changes that reduce overall transport and handling costs should be encouraged. pi —Transportation programs should not distort normal market forces affecting producers or processors. —Transportation policies should not lead to the need for federal or provincial programs designed to offset the effects ofanother pw transport program. —Transportation policy should be consistent with international trade rules and minimize the risk oftrade action by other countries. (PI pn pn 23 APPENDIX B DETAILED EFFECTS OF PROPOSAL IMPLEMENTATION Primary Agriculture would be due to the changes in relative farmgate prices of grains and oilseeds An econometric model was developed to resulting from implementation ofthe proposal. quantifythe effects ofthe proposed buyout However, ifany portion ofthe cash stream and revised grain handling and transportation from the bond had been incorporated by systemon the grains and and livestock sectors farmers into their decisions, the changes in in the Prairie Provinces. The regions utilized grain production would have been smaller. were Statistics Canada's 22 Agricultural Reporting Areas (ARA). These ARA's were Price Responses aggregated into seven regions for the analysis. These regions were: southern Alberta, central The model showed that, with adoption ofthe Alberta, northern Alberta, southern Saskat proposal, the local market price for Board chewan, east-central Saskatchewan, north grains would have dropped by the Federal western Saskatchewan, and Manitoba. Figure Government's share ofthe total rail freight 1 depicts the seven regions. While B.C. was rate over the 1980 to 1988 study period. The not included as a region due to data con government's share over this period ranged straints, it is felt the results for northern from roughly $18 per tonne in 1980 to $26 per (Peace River) and southern Alberta accurately tonne in the latter part of the 1980's. reflect B.C.'s grain and cow/calfsectors, However, cost savings in the grain handling respectively. and transportation system arising from the WGTAproposal averaged $6, $7, and $5 per The analysis ofthe effects ofthe proposal was tonne in Alberta, Saskatchewan and carried out using an historical period over Manitoba, respectively. As such, the farmgate which prices, production, weather, trade price for Board grains would have declined by patterns and general economic conditions the difference between the present were known with certainty. Such an analysis government commitment and the cost savings eliminated the need to project parameters into inherent in the WGTA component of the the future, a practice which can be imprecise proposal. This decline in the farmgate price for and subjective. The period analyzed was 1980 Board grains in the latter part of the 1980's to 1988, and the effects described are on the would have been roughly $15 to $21 per tonne. basis ofwhat would have happened ifthe In response to a decrease in the local market proposal had been in place over that period. price for Board grains, the off-Board price would have decreased by approximately The crops studied were wheat, barley, canola, $14.75, $13 and $11.75 per tonne in Alberta, oats, and flax (Manitoba only). For the Saskatchewan and Manitoba, respectively. livestock sector, the size ofthe beefcow herd, These differential changes in off-Board barley replacement heifer inventory, feeder steer prices across the Prairies would not only have inventory, and sow inventory levels were been the result ofthe differences in freight analyzed. charges, but also the differences in local Under a buy out ofthe Crow Benefit, cash market conditions in each ofthe provinces. payments to the landowners (typically the Given that feeder cattle prices are in part farm operator) were assumed not to directly determined by the off-Board barley price, the influence cropping and livestock decisions. above declines in barley prices would have Consequently, changes in cropping patterns resulted in feeder cattle prices rising by an 24 • ?• r- 'T •—1 ^^ '—1 ^^1 1 • 1 ' 1 ALBERTA / III - IKDRTH / 1SASKATCHEWAN 1 / to MANITOBA / en II - CENTRAL I III - NORTH ViEST^S \ J 1 II - EAST CENTRAL 1 , ( I- SOUTH ^ \ I 1 I- SOUTH 1 FIGURE 1 PRAIRIE CROP DISTRICTS IP) average of $4.50, $2.25 and $4.05 per production, while all other regions displayed hundredweight in Alberta, Saskatchewan and increases. Manitoba, respectively. Annual flax production in Manitoba would Grain Production Responses by have risen 35,000 tonnes (7 percent). Given Region Manitoba's diverse resource base, similar PI increases in specialty crop production would The results ofthe study indicate that annual have also likely occurred over the 1980 to 1988 wheat production would have declined over all period. seven regions by approximately 7 percent (1.45 million tonnes) on average over the In summary, overall cropping patterns would period. This ranged from 1 percent in southern have changed under the proposal. This would Alberta to 17 percent in northwestern have been due to the changes in relative prices Saskatchewan. (Southern Alberta is a between crops and their historical influence on predominantly wheat growing area with cropping decisions. Those regions with the limited opportunities at present to alter its ability to shift cropping patterns would have crop mix, while northwestern Saskatchewan is changed in favor ofhigher value crops. a dark brown to black soil zone area, offering It must be noted that this analysis did not greater cropping and livestock alternatives.) attempt to measure what would have occurred Figure 2 depicts the average annual change in ifthe Crow Benefit had been removed without crop production that would have occurred in compensation. Such an analysis would have to each ofthe seven regions and the provinces as factor out the implicit influence ofthe Crow a whole. Benefit on cropping decisions. It is felt, Barley production would have decreased by however, that the above analysis accurately roughly 10 percent (1.0 million tonnes) over reflects the effects ofa buy out/revised grain the Prairies. This ranged from 5 percent in handling and transportation system proposal northwestern Saskatchewan and northern where compensation is offered and where Alberta to 29 percent in southern market signals predominantly determine Saskatchewan. resource allocation. Canola production would have increased by Livestock Production Responses by PI approximately 5 percent (190,000 tonnes) over Region the Prairies. This ranged from no change in Manitoba to 37 percent in southern With implementation ofthe proposal over Saskatchewan. Central Alberta showed a 1980 to 1988, the beefcow herd would have small decline in canola production; however, increased annually on average by 11 percent this decline should be viewed with caution. (280,000 head) across the Prairie Provinces. The dynamics of this region were difficult to This increase ranged from 1 percent in east model in most ofthe crops studied as this central Saskatchewan to 29 percent in region has the ability to grow all crops and is northern Alberta. The increases were smallin also a major livestock-producing region in the the earlier years ofthe change, during which province. heifers were retained for breeding purposes. The upward movement in the cow herd in the Oat production changes were mixed, with latter years was much greater as resources IP some regions experiencing increases in oat would have been reallocated and the production and others showing decreases in infrastructure expanded to facilitate change. production. Overall, oat production would have increased by 4 percent (84,000 tonnes). With the increase in cow herd and the Central Alberta showed a decline, Manitoba reduction in barley prices, the costs offeeding experienced no significant change in oat cattle for slaughter would have been reduced. 26 -r—1 r~=i FIGURE 2 REGIONAL CROP PRODUCTION CHANGES UNDER A CROW BENEFIT BUYOUT AND REFORMED RATE STRUCTURE PROPOSAL. PERCENT CHANGE 40 1^ 30 20 10 h^ V- 0 7KXT 7^\ ^7 [SiVS m- •'/. .ZJ / to y/, m (10) W '/ (20) (30) SOUTH ALTA. NORTH ALTA. E-C SASK. MANITOBA CENTRAL ALTA. SOUTH SASK. N-W SASK. WEST CAN. REGIONS WHEAT '// BARLEY CANOLA DATA ARE AVERAGES FOR LAST 5 YEARS OF SIMULATION BASE TONNAGES (MILLIONS) WHEAT 2.79 1.77 0.59 3.92 4.65 2.41 3.52 19.66 BARLEY 1.81 3.02 0.81 0.45 1.46 1.01 1.47 10.04 CANOLA .25 0.67 0.38 .04 0.89 0.65 0.57 3.45 p? Inventories offeeder cattle would have risen Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Alberta, across the Prairies by 25 percent (450,000 respectively. head). The increase ranged from 1 percent in Manitoba to 35 percent in southern Overall annual primary agriculture sector Saskatchewan. Southern Alberta showed the revenue would have increased by $695 million largest absolute increase with an additional (8 percent). Provincially, the increases would 200,000 head, nearly 45 percent ofthe overall have been $50 million, $136 million and $509 Western Canadian increase. This increase is million in Manitoba, Saskatchewan and not only a reflection ofthe region's Alberta, respectively. Such increases infrastructure, but also ofthe relative location represent significant gains in annual primary ofthe region to both the supply offeeders and agriculture sector revenue under a buy out the markets for beef. and revised grain handling and transportation system. Figure 5 depicts the net gains in The results ofthe analysis also indicate that agriculture revenue by province. the hog industry would have experienced an increase in sow numbers, averaging Gross Domestic Product and PI approximately 5 percent or 18,000 sows. This Employment ranged from no change in northern Alberta to an increase of 13 percent in Saskatchewan. Under the proposal, there would not only be Figure 3 shows the changes in livestock benefits to the Western Canadian primary numbers that would have occurred by region agriculture sector, but to the Canadian across the provinces. economy in general. This is due to trade in commodities, intermediate inputs, and Revenue Changes by Region processed products occurring not only within or between the regions analyzed, but also Grain enterprise revenue, inclusive ofthe between these regions and the rest ofCanada. historical Crow Benefit commitment and the cost savings in the grain handling and Generally accepted Gross Domestic Product transportation system, would have increased (GDP) multipliers for the economy are 1.1 to IPI by 2 percent or $105 million. Central Alberta 1.2. The results ofthe studyindicate that and northwestern Saskatchewan showed gross annual revenue would have increased declines of$24 million (3.5 percent) and $15 $695 million per year in Western Canadian million (2 percent), respectively. East central primary agriculture. As a result, the increase Saskatchewan and southern Alberta showed in Canada's annual GDP would have been the largestincreases of $48 million or 5 $765 million to $834 million per year. percent and $48 million or 8 percent, respectively (see Figure 4). The increases With such a significant increase in GDP, exhibited in southern and northern Alberta, additional employment opportunities would southern and east central Saskatchewan, and have also developed. Rough estimates for Manitoba are the result ofincreased oilseeds employment multipliers suggest that for every output and the non-Board and off-Board prices increase in revenue of$110,000 to $200,000, not dropping by the entire Crow Benefit due to one more job would be created. Consequently, local supply/demand conditions. a $695 million rise in annual primary agriculture sector revenue would have Livestock enterprise revenue would have risen increased annual employment figures by 3,500 in all regions with an average increase in to 6,300jobs. Western Canada's annual livestock revenue of $589 million (17 percent). On a provincial Trade Policy basis, livestock revenue would have increased $34 million, $90 million and $466 million in The method ofpaying the Crow Benefit subsidy under the WGTA has implications for 28 '—=1 "1 ' 1 ' =1 1 1 =1 1 T FIGURE 3 REGIONAL LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION CHANGES UNDER A CROW BENEFIT BUYOUT AND REFORMED RATE STRUCTURE PROPOSAL. PERCENT CHANGE 40 30 20 to CD 10 SOUTH ALTA. NORTH ALTA. EC SASK MANITOBA CENTRAL ALTA. SOUTH SASK. N-W SASK. WEST CAN. REGIONS [gj COWS [g] FEEDERS fgj HOGS DATA ARE AVERAGES FOR LAST 5 YEARS OF SIMULATION COWS 574 728 73 350 226 213 363 2527 FEEDERS 406 348 19 68 69 58 117 1085 HOGS 62 100 7 91 120 380 1 '—1 FIGURE 4 CHANGE IN GRAIN PRODUCERS' REVENUE UNDER A CROW BENEFIT BUYOUT AND A REFORMED RATE STRUCTURE PROPOSAL. MILLIONS OF DOLLARS 120 100 80 h +7.8% 60 +5.3% \777777A 40 Y/////. W//A - / v/v'// +7.3% +2.8% +1.3% 20 '////,/ V77, 7/ Y////yv///. CO V/, /. V/, 7V^7, O /////// ZTZ^ ±1 Z2 1ZJ +2.4% (20) wm2Z -3.3% -2.4% (40) t SOUTH ALTA. NORTH ALTA. EC SASK. MANITOBA CENTRAL ALTA. SOUTH SASK. N-W SASK. WEST CAN. REGIONS ^ZZ GROSS REVENUE NET 21 OF RAIL TRANSPORT DATA ARE AVERAGES FOR LAST 5 YEARS OF SIMULATION BASE REVENUES (BILLIONS) 0.646 0.765 0.278 0.627 1.082 0.656 0.921 4.975 r~l 1 % =1 ' ^1 FIGURE 5 CHANGE IN PRIMARY AGRICULTURE ANNUAL GROSS REVENUE UNDER A BUY OUT AND REVISED GRAIN HANDLING AND TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM. MILLIONS OF DOLLARS 800 7-7-7-7-7-7 7^ y A/A /A '-•/A 600 - // / /. /. '/. '/ '//A/, ' / /. / / • / AA CO • /, 400 // / . / •'/. / z.. /, */ •yy/y / V. 200 / 4 / •'//,• /// / / - VA'/A V77A s . • •//, / y/ '"/ '/ / ~7~7~~7~y 7^77 '/ ,•• 0 •m ALBERTA SASKATCHEWAN MANITOBA WESTERN CANADA VA,/// GROSS REVENUE NET OF '221 RAIL TRANSPORT COSTS Figures are average annual changes over the last 5 years of the buy out period. Canada's trade policies in relation to the could be excluded from countervail ifthe Canada-U.S. Trade Agreement (CUSTA), the buy out is considered to be an adjustment Multilateral Trade Negotiations (MTN) in program. GATT and the application ofU.S. countervail law. Taxation Level The Crow Benefit as currently paid is an input The short run overall taxation implications of subsidy, making it vulnerable to trade actions the cash stream under the proposal should not under the provisions of GATT and U.S. be large forthe reason that the annual cash countervail law. Under commitments likely to stream equates closely to payments being emerge from the current GATT Round, the made annually under the present Crow WGTA program will likely be classified as a Benefit system. However, forthe individual, commodity-based input subsidy and, variation in tax implications could arise from therefore, will be subject to reduction or differences in status, (e.g., landowner, phase-out over some specified period of time. landowner/producer tenant), from the marketing ofproduction (e.g., export and/or The risk ofcountervail action against subsidy domestic marketing) and from commodity payments under the WGTA is significant and, production mix. In the long run, equating regardless ofthe outcome in GATT, it is this marginal revenue with marginal costs trade policy implication that is likely to be a suggests minimal tax implications. key impetus to changes being required in the current method ofpaying the Crow Benefit. Rural Communities Under the bond proposal for buying out the In the development ofthe 1989 Alberta/British Crow Benefit, the essential implications are Columbia Method ofPayment proposal, the that: University ofAlberta evaluated the community impacts ofpaying the Crow —Under a likely GATT agreement, the buy Benefit to the producer. The approach used out could fall under the "green" category and the conclusions ofthe study are generally (permitted policies not normally subject to applicable to the buy out proposal. GATT discipline). The length ofthe bond, 15 years, may move the proposal into the The University researchers reviewed the "amber" category (i.e., permitted, but effects that branch line abandonment and disciplined, policies where the time payment of the Crow Benefit to producers requirements are negotiable). would have on rural communities. Their work —Under the CUSTA, the bond payment concluded that the evolution ofrural would be included in the calculation oftotal communities is a response to global forces. income transfers which are used in These include: increased commercialization of determination ofrelative grain support agriculture, farm consolidation, low levels for the purpose ofmaking decisions commodity prices, improved highway on retention or removal ofCWB import networks, and the increased use ofprivate licensing. U.S. quotas should not be affect automobiles. They concluded that the high ed by the provisions ofthe buy out bond. profile ofagricultural transportation issues such as branch line abandonment and elevator —The basis ofpayment — arable acres within closure are not ofprimary importance in this a defined area or region — would provide evolution. Their conclusions indicate that even historic links between payments under the under a buy out option with accelerated buy out and the grains sector. These links branch line abandonment, the impacts on may be sufficient to provide grounds for rural communities would be small. The applying countervail underU.S. negative impacts would be offset by factors countervail law but this is not certain. It 32 •SI such as increased commercial trucking, Increased Trucking stimulation oflocal entrepreneurs, and the Some farmers would truck further as a result appearance ofsmall scale industrial ofbranch line abandonment — some to diversification. capture incentive rates at highly efficient The work ofthe University ofAlberta creates facilities, others because their delivery points the impression that major technological forces have been closed. Farmers would experience cannot be denied and a policy which favours an increase in the average distance that grain technical advance will be in the best interest must be moved to reach rail siding. ofrural people in the long run. In the proposed revised rate structure, it has been assumed that approximately halfof Grain Handling And Transportation Western Canadian grain production, or System approximately 20 million tonnes, would be As a result ofthe proposed changes to the rate affected within 30 years and that, as a result structure and the regulations related to grain ofthe consolidation ofthe elevator system, transportation, itis anticipated that the rate this grain would have to be trucked 40 miles ofchange in the grain handling and as opposed to today's 15 miles to reach rail transportation system would increase. This siding. In 10 years about 6 million tonnes would result in significant cost savings for would have to be trucked further as a result of shippers within ten years. abandonment. Many farmers only consider their variable Improved Efficiency trucking costs when hauling grain and, Railways have improved their productivity to therefore, conclude that they can haul cheaper some degree over the past decade. With than commercial truckers. However, when P) greater flexibility, itis anticipated that the only part of the value ofthe vehicle and a rate ofproductivity improvement would modest return for operator labour are added to increase to 1 percent a year from 0.5 percent a the variable costs offarm trucking, the cost of wt year. This would result in an additional 5 commercial trucking becomes economical. If percent decline in costs over ten years. Ifthe the distance increased from 15 to 40 miles, the incremental cost reduction of5 percent were net cost ofgrain trucking, at commercial rates, applied to the total variable costs of $820 would only increase by about $1.80 per tonne million, savings would be in the order of $35 to on the 6 million tonnes affected. $40 million annually after ten years. It has been estimated that for every 1 percent reduction in the branch line network, trucking Branch Line Savings costs increase by $550,000. The additional 20 The revised rate structure should accelerate percent reduction in branch lines resulting branch line abandonment from 1 percent from implementation ofthis proposal would annually to 3.6 percent per year. In a ten year increase trucking costs by $11 million period, 30 percent ofthe branch lines could be annually after ten years. abandoned rather than the 10 percent currently projected to be abandoned. The net In terms of road impacts, the use of more savings from eliminating an additional commercial trucking should see fewer 20 percent of line-related costs would be $18 equivalent single axle loads (ESALS) on million annually after ten years. roadways. As most ofthe increased truck travel would take place on higher density roads, the impacts should be negligible. 33 BetterUtilization ofHopper Cars Churchill Une should be removed from the cost base, saving shippers $5 million annually. With reduced branch lines and less car spotting along remaining lines, improved Reduced Elevator Numbers utilization of hopper cars (five day improvement in average cycletimes) and The number ofsmall elevators would be p? marshalling yards could be expected. This reduced through replacement by large would reduce the hopper car purchases needed facilities. For example, five smallerfacilities in by the year 2000 from the 9,000 cars that the the 16,000 tonne throughput category couldbe Grain Transportation Agency (GTA) has replaced by one 80,000 tonne facility. Some of recommended to 2,000 cars. Annual savings as these larger elevators would be able to clean a result ofthis reduction in car requirements grain to export standards. More inland would be $46 million. Reduced switching costs cleaning would reduce the total tonnage of low would also result from the reduction in value dockage moving to the coast and thus marshalling required with larger and fewer increase the overall capacity ofthe fleet. car spots. The savings from the reduced Elevator rationalization and consolidation switching are difficult to identify but they are partially reflected in the increased would not likely reduce the average tariffs productivity for railways identified earlier. that are applied. This is largely the result of the fact that tariffs on primary elevator service have been kept low over the past few Reduced Crosshauls years. Companies would find it difficult to Based on information provided by the CWB fund the construction ofnew facilities and the and NTA, it is evident that the CWB hauls upgrading of older facilities iftariffs were about 1 million metric tonnes ofwheat and reduced from current levels. barley from Alberta to Thunder Bay and a similarvolume from Manitoba to Vancouver. Furthermore, increasing the number of days When full rates come into effect, the cost ofall that rail cars can be loaded and increasing the crosshauling(including Saskatchewan) would hours per week that elevators accept increase from $13 million annually to about deliveries would result in increased labour $50 million. It is anticipated that the Board costs. Itis expected that the benefits elevator would reduce crosshauls originating from companies would receive from fewer elevator Manitoba and Alberta. By shipping nearly all locations would be invested in larger grain to the ports closest to Alberta and structures to make them more efficient. Manitoba, the CWB could reduce transportation costs by $29 million. Environmental Sustainability Sustainability ofagriculture is one ofthe four Elimination ofChurchill Costs pillars of the federal-provincial agriculture The port ofChurchill usually handles about policy review currently underway. In the 500,000 tonnes ofgrain exports annually. document "Growing Together", two major farm However, the portis not needed to handle support programs were identified as being current export volumes. The primary reasons problematic: for continuing to use Churchill reflect strategic and regional development concerns. The WGTA and the WGSA, in their attempts When farmers pay the full freight rate after a to support current farm operations, tend also change in method ofpayment, they should not to encourage monocultures, reduce be obligated to fulfill the responsibilities that diversification and increase long term properly belong to the Federal Government. financial risk faced by farmers. The costs associated with maintaining the IB 34 #PI The Crow Benefit subsidy, in particular, has Under a Crow Benefit buy out, land use artificially increased the margin from patterns would reflect price signals from the producing grain for export. This has market. Marginal lands would be returned to contributed to the expansion ofcropped areas pasture in some areas. Livestock production in Western Canada. Between 1971 and 1986, would expand with consequent increases in improved farm area increased only 8 percent, forage production and nutrient recycling. The while in the same period, the area cropped incentive to expand grains production onto increased 22 percent. A significant portion of marginal land and wetlands would be reduced. the expansion ofcropped area has occurred on marginal land which is susceptible to wind In areas where there are few options besides erosion. The Crow Benefit has also encouraged producing wheat in a fallow rotation, lower the draining ofwetlands and sloughs to the margins from grain production could detriment ofwildlife/waterfowl. encourage greater use ofsummerfallow. However, under a buy out, landowners would Associated with the expansion ofcropped area have a significant amount ofcapital in the has been a reduction in the use of forages in form oftheir bonds. This could be invested in crop rotations as livestock production has switching to more environmentally sound low become a less common activity in many tillage or chemical fallow practices or be used regions. Reduced forage and livestock to move out ofgrains production. production have had negative impacts on the level oforganic matterin the soil and have In general, the buy out should help to improve resulted in exposure ofsoil to wind and water the sustainability ofagriculture because it erosion. would eliminate the incentive to use low intensity monoculture systems at the expense ofmore environmentally sound mixed agriculture systems. 4 35 BOND ENTITLEMENT EXAMPLES BY REPRESENTATIVE TOWNS IN ALBERTA At present, the Crow Benefit is paid to the railways on the basis of not only tonnages shipped, but also distance to port. Table 1 provides estimates of per acre bond entitlements adjusted for soil productivity and distance to port. The examples provided in the table attempt to cover all soil zones and the varying distances to port encountered in Alberta. Table 2 provides estimated cash flows of the bond entitlement to its owner. TABLE 1: EXAMPLES OF BOND ENTITLEMENTS PRODUCTIVITY DISTANCE CALCULATED ADJUSTMENT ADJUSTMENT ENTITLEMENT REGION AND FACTOR FACTOR ($ PER ACRE) TOWNS SOIL ZONE (A) (B) (A X B X $86/ACRE) SOUTH-EAST Foremost Brown 0.73 1.07 67 Manyberries Brown 0.73 1.08 68 Medicine Hat Brown 0.73 1.05 66 Acadia Valley Brown 0.73 1.15 73 Hanna Dark Brown 0.93 1.07 86 Oyen Brown 0.73 1.12 70 Consort Brown 0.80 1.10 76 Bindloss Brown 0.73 1.05 66 SOUTH-CENTRAL Milk River Dark Brown 0.93 1.05 84 Lethbridge Dark Brown 1.00 1.01 87 Vulcan Dark Brown 1.00 0.98 84 Gleichen Dark Brown 1.00 0.96 83 Trochu Thin Black 1.20 0.98 101 Drumheller Dark Brown 1.00 1.05 90 Brooks Brown 0.73 1.00 63 Vauxhall Brown 0.80 1.03 71 SOUTH-WEST Cardston Thin Black 1.13 1.07 104 fort Macleod Dark Brown 1.00 1.00 86 Nanton Black 1.27 0.96 105 Okotoks Black 1.27 0.95 103 Olds Black 1.33 0.96 111 Airdrie Black 1.27 0.95 103 Pincher Creek Dark Brown 1.07 1.00 92 PRODUCTIVITY DISTANCE CALCULATED ADJUSTMENT ADJUSTMENT ENTITLEMENT REGION AND FACTOR FACTOR ($ PER ACRE) TOWNS SOIL ZONE (A) (B) (A X B X $86/ACRE) EAST-CENTRAL Stettler Thin Black 1.13 1.00 97 Camrose Black 1.27 0.96 105 Lamont Black 1.27 0.95 103 Vegreville Black 1.27 0.98 107 Vermilion Black 1.13 1.01 99 Wainwright Black 1.13 1.01 99 Provost Dark Brown 0.93 1.13 91 Viking Black 1.27 0.98 107 Coronation Dark Brown 0.93 1.08 87 WEST-CENTRAL Redwater Black 1.27 0.95 103 Innisfail Black 1.33 0.98 112 Red Deer Black 1.33 1.00 114 Wetaskiwin Black 1.27 1.03 112 Rimbey Black 1.13 1.03 101 Stony Plain Dark Grey 1.20 0.91 94 Bon Accord Black 1.27 0.95 103 Ponoka Black 1.27 1.01 111 NORTH-CENTRAL Elk Point Black 1.20 1.03 106 St. Paul Black 1.13 1.01 99 Bonnyvilie Dark Grey Luvisol 1.00 1.03 89 Smoky Lake Dark Grey 1.07 0.98 90 Westlock Dark Grey 1.13 0.96 94 Mayerthorpe Dark Grey 0.93 0.98 79 Barrhead Dark Grey 1.13 0.96 94 Athabasca Dark Grey 0.93 1.00 80 PRODUCTIVITY DISTANCE CALCULATED ADJUSTMENT ADJUSTMENT ENTITLEMENT REGION AND FACTOR FACTOR ($ PER ACRE) TOWNS SOIL ZONE (A) (B) (A X BX $86/ACRE) NORTH McLennan Grey 0.80 1.05 72 Grande Prairie Black 1.07 0.95 87 Spirit River Black 1.07 1.00 92 Peace River Grey 0.80 1.08 75 Beaverlodge Dark Grey 0.93 0.98 79 Manning Black 1.00 1.13 98 High Level Grey 0.80 1.22 84 Fairview Grey 0.80 1.12 77 1. Bond entitlements for land classified as arable irrigation land can be estimated by applying a factor of 1.48 to the acres of land classified as arable acres and then applying the productivity adjustment factor and the distance adjustment factor to arrive at the calculated entitlement. 2. The productivity adjustment factor has been calculated by dividing the estimated productivity rating for the area (e.g., Medicine Hat at 55) by the assumed weighted average for the CWB designated area (75) to give the productivity adjustment factor of 0.73. 3. The average entitlement per acre is estimated to be $86 per acre. TABLE 2: CASH FLOW OF BOND ENTITLEMENT CASH FLOW OF ENTITLEMENT IF HELD TO REDEMPTION1 (DOLLARS) FACE VALUE OF BOND IF ESTIMATED DAY 1 HELD TO TRADED VALUE ON SUMMATION REDEMPTION REGION AND A RECOGNIZED YEARS YEARS YEARS OF CASH AFTER YEAR TOWNS EXCHANGE 1 THRU 5 6 THRU 10 11 THRU 15 FLOW 15 SOUTH-EAST Foremost 63,865 7,933 6,521 3,899 91,764 67,226 Manyberries 64,885 8,059 6,625 3,961 93,229 68,300 Medicine Hat 62,845 7,806 6,417 3,837 90,299 66,153 Acadia Valley 68,964 8,566 7,042 4,210 99,090 72,594 Hanna 81,283 10,096 8,299 4,963 116,791 85,561 Oyen 66,924 8,313 6,833 4,086 96,160 70,447 Consort 71,896 8,930 7,341 4,389 103,303 75,680 Bindloss 62,845 7,806 6,417 3,837 90,299 66,153 SOUTH-CENTRAL Milk River 79,985 9,935 8,167 4,883 114,926 84,195 Lethbridge 82,917 10,299 8,466 5,062 119,138 87,281 Vulcan 80,136 9,954 8,182 4,892 115,142 84,353 Gleichen 78,745 9,781 8,040 4,808 113,144 82,889 Trochu 96,163 11,944 9,819 5,871 138,171 101,224 Drumheller 85,698 10,645 8,750 5,232 123,135 90,209 Brooks 59,786 7,426 6,104 3,650 85,903 62,932 Vauxhall 67,446 8,377 6,887 4,118 96,909 70,996 CASH FLOW OF ENTITLEMENT IF HELD TO REDEMPTION (DOLLARS) FACE VALUE OF BOND IF ESTIMATED DAY 1 HELD TO TRADED VALUE ON SUMMATION REDEMPTION REGION AND A RECOGNIZED YEARS YEARS YEARS OF CASH AFTER YEAR TOWNS EXCHANGE 1 THRU 5 6 THRU 10 11 THRU 15 FLOW 15 SOUTH-WEST Cardston 98,701 12,260 10,078 6,026 141,817 103,895 Fort Macleod 81,526 10,126 8,324 4,977 117,140 85,817 Nanton 99,744 12,389 10,184 6,090 143,316 104,993 Okotoks 97,982 12,170 10,004 5,982 140,785 103,139 Olds 104,993 13,041 10,720 6,410 150,859 110,519 Airdrie 97,982 12,170 10,004 5,982 140,785 103,139 Pincher Creek 86,961 10,802 8,879 5,309 124,950 91,538 EAST-CENTRAL Stettler 92,396 11,477 9,434 5,641 132,759 97,259 Camrose 99,744 12,389 10,184 6,090 143,316 104,993 Lamont 97,982 12,170 10,004 5,982 140,785 103,139 Vegreville 101,505 12,608 10,364 6,197 145,847 106,847 Vermilion 93,972 11,672 9,595 5,737 135,023 98,918 Wainwright 93,972 11,672 9,595 5,737 135,023 98,918 Provost 86,475 10,741 8,830 5,279 124,250 91,026 Viking 101,505 12,608 10,364 6,197 145,847 106,847 Coronation 82,581 10,257 8,432 5,042 118,655 86,927 WEST-CENTRAL Redwater 97,982 12,170 10,004 5,982 140,785 103,139 Innisfail 106,847 13,272 10,910 6,523 153,523 112,471 Red Deer 108,702 13,502 11,099 6,637 156,187 114,423 Wetaskiwin 106,789 13,264 10,904 6,520 153,440 112,410 Rimbey 95,548 11,868 9,756 5,833 137,288 100,577 Stony Plain 89,488 11,115 9,137 5,463 128,580 94,197 Bon Accord 97,982 12,170 10,004 5,982 140,785 103,139 Ponoka 105,028 13,046 10,724 6,412 150,909 110,556 CASH FLOW OF ENTITLEMENT IF HELD TO REDEMPTION (DOLLARS) FACE VALUE OF BOND IF ESTIMATED DAY 1 HELD TO TRADED VALUE ON SUMMATION REDEMPTION REGION AND A RECOGNIZED YEARS YEARS YEARS OF CASH AFTER YEAR TOWNS EXCHANGE 1 THRU 5 6 THRU 10 11 THRU 15 FLOW 15 NORTH-CENTRAL Elk Point 101,169 12,566 10,330 6,177 145,364 106,494 St. Paul 93,972 11,672 9,595 5,737 135,023 98,918 Bonnyvilie 84,307 10,472 8,608 5,147 121,136 88,745 Smoky Lake 85,478 10,617 8,728 5,219 122,818 89,977 Westlock 89,244 11,085 9,112 5,449 128,230 93,941 Mayerthorpe 74,793 9,290 7,637 4,566 107,466 78,730 Barrhead 89,244 11,085 9,112 5,449 128,230 93,941 Athabasca 76,091 9,451 7,769 4,646 109,331 80,096 NORTH McLennan 68,558 8,516 7,000 4,186 98,508 72,167 Grande Prairie 82,511 10,249 8,425 5,038 118,556 86,854 Spirit River 86,961 10,802 8,879 5,309 124,950 91,538 Peace River 70,783 8,792 7,227 4,322 101,705 74,509 Beaverlodge 74,793 9,290 7,637 4,566 107,466 78,730 Manning 92,651 11,508 9,460 5,657 133,125 97,528 High Level 79,684 9,898 8,136 4,865 114,493 83,877 Fairview 73,009 9,068 7,455 4,457 104,902 76,851 Total entitlement and cash flow based on a 1,000 acre grain farm. The estimated securities exchange trading value was based on the August 7, 1990, value of Federal Government bonds with similar yields and maturity dates. Figure 1 Legend: I = South - East II = South - Central 111= South - West IV = East - Central V = West - Central VI = North - Central VII= North 10/17/90 13:42 ©403 437 5993 AAMDC/JUBILEE -»->-♦ M077 1001/002 ALBERTA ASSOCIATION of MUNICIPAL DISTRICTS & COUNTIES PSS: LARRY GOODHOPE — EXECUTIVE OIRECTOR 17 October 1990 TO: COUNTIES AND MUNICIPAL DISTRICTS FROM: LARRY GOODHOPE SUBJECT: ACCOMPANYING GUESTS PROGRAM WE GOOFED On October 10, 1990, we forwarded to your offices advance information on the convention. included in your package was a "Green" sheet of paper which was the "ACCOMPANYING GUESTS" program. PLEASE DESTROY THAT PROGRAM AND USE THE NEW ONE ATTACHED TO THIS MEMO. OUR SINCERE APOLOGIES FOR ANY INCONVENIENCE WE MAY HAVE CAUSED. MONDAY, NOVEMBER 12 7:30 P.M. BLACKWOOD HODOE 8:00 p.m. WINE AND CHEESE SOCIAL EVENING Featuring "The Whistling Convention Inn Ballroom Brakeman" - Imperial Room - Level PI, Terrace Inn THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 15 Courtesy Reed Stenhousc A TOTAL FREE DAY 9:45 a.m. TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 13 Partners arc welcome to 7:00 P.M. ASSOCIATION SOCIAL attend and listen lo the keynote EVENING speakers. The Calloways' and Smorgasbord -Dance their entertaining presentation Terrace Inn Ballroom on our personal responsibility Tor Corsages courtesy of the environment. Pardee Terrace Inn Ballroom Equipment Ltd. & Twin Tractor -i 12:00 Noon SALAD BAR LUNCHEON a FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 16 33 < Convention Inn Ballroom 8:30 A.M. BREAKFAST AT THE < Featuring Kim Sanderson, and TOP her topic 'THE Convention Inn ENVIRONMENTAL DIET" Courtesy Treasury Plus STOP n SHOP, MINI Branches of BAZAAR Alberta CO at CD 10:45 A.M. GUEST ENTERTAINER - Nylc 730 P.M. R. ANGUS SOCIAL Henderson "Cowboy Poet" EVENING Terrace Inn Ballroom Convention Inn Ballroom o WEDNESDAY NOVEMBER 14 1030 A.M. STAGE WEST - BRUNCH CO Busses leaving 10:15 a.m. C3 from Terrace Inn (north «H door) "MOVE OVER MRS. o CD MARKHAM" featuring Bemie Kopell from the Lovcboat Scries ,-1 o