DOCSLIB.ORG

PDU Case Report XXXX/YY Date

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

planning report D&P/3474a/01 30 January 2017 Glengall Quay, Isle of Dogs in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets planning application no. PA/16/03518 Strategic planning application stage 1 referral Town & Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended); Greater London Authority Acts 1999 and 2007; Town & Country Planning (Mayor of London) Order 2008. The proposal Demolition of existing buildings and comprehensive mixed use redevelopment including two buildings ranging from 25 storeys (85.5m AOD) to 30 storeys (100.8m AOD) in height, comprising 316 residential units (Class C3), 1,778sqm (GIA) of flexible non-residential floor space (Classes A1, A3, A4 and D1), private and communal open spaces, car and cycle parking and associated landscaping and public realm works. The applicant The applicant is Healey Development Solutions (Millharbour) Ltd, the planning agent is GVA and the architect is 3D Reid. Strategic issues summary Land use principle: residential-led mixed-use redevelopment is supported (paragraph 14) Housing: the proposed offer of 35% by habitable room is broadly supported; however further discussions are required to ensure the affordability of the units, including the inclusion of London Living Rent. The applicant is also required to fully explore the use of grant funding in accordance with the draft Affordable Housing and Viability SPG. (paragraphs 15-19) Urban design: the scheme is generally well designed and the height and massing would not harm strategic views or the setting of heritage assets. (paragraphs 22-28) Recommendation That Tower Hamlets Council be advised that, whilst the principle of the proposal is supported, the application does not comply with the London Plan, for the reasons set out in paragraph 42 of this report. However, the resolution of those issues could lead to the application becoming compliant with the London Plan. page 1 Context 1 On 23 December 2016 the Mayor of London received documents from Tower Hamlets Council notifying him of a planning application of potential strategic importance to develop the above site for the above uses. Under the provisions of The Town & Country Planning (Mayor of London) Order 2008 the Mayor has until 30 January 2017 to provide the Council with a statement setting out whether he considers that the application complies with the London Plan, and his reasons for taking that view. The Mayor may also provide other comments. This report sets out information for the Mayor’s use in deciding what decision to make. 2 The application is referable under the following Categories of the Schedule to the Order 2008: Category 1A: Development which comprises or includes the provision of more than 150 houses, flats, or houses and flats. Category 1B: Development (other than development which only comprises the provision of houses, flats or houses and flats) which comprises or includes the erection of a building or buildings outside Central London and with a total floorspace of more than 15,000 sq.m. Category 1C: Development which comprises or includes the erection of a building more than 30 metres high and outside the City of London. 3 Once Tower Hamlets Council has resolved to determine the application, it is required to refer it back to the Mayor for his decision as to whether to direct refusal; take it over for his own determination; or allow the Council to determine it itself. 4 The environmental information for the purposes of the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2011, as amended, has been taken into account in the consideration of this case. 5 The Mayor of London’s statement on this case will be made available on the GLA website www.london.gov.uk. Site description 6 This 0.7 hectare site is bound to the east by Millwall Inner Dock and to the west by Millharbour. Pepper Street runs through the site from east to west and provides pedestrian and cycle access between Millharbour and Crosshabour DLR station via a bridge over the dock, although elements of this route are also open to traffic. Muirfield Crescent runs around the edge of the site, providing vehicle access to the existing buildings, as well as the flats immediately to the east. To the north and south are large data centre buildings in the process of being extended/redeveloped. The application site comprises predominantly three to four storey buildings with ground floor commercial uses fronting Pepper Street and office uses above, along with surface car parking. There is also a two storey public house, known as Pepper St Ontiod, adjacent to the dock. 7 The site is well served by public transport; Crossharbour Docklands Light Railway (DLR) station can be accessed 150 metres to the east, across Glengall Bridge, and South Quay DLR station is located 450 metres to the north. The nearest London Underground station is Canary Wharf, on the Jubilee line, located 1 kilometre north of the site. Canary Wharf Elizabeth Line station, due to open in December 2018, is located approximately 1.3 kilometre to the north of the site. In addition, three bus routes operate along East Ferry Road (D6, D8 and 135). The site therefore has a moderate Public Transport Accessibility Level (PTAL) of three (on a scale out of six, where six is excellent). The site is also served page 2 by the Mayor’s Cycle Hire Scheme, with the nearest docking station located on Millharbour (19 docking points). Pepper Street is on National Cycle Route 1, from London Docklands to Lea Valley. 8 The site sits within a number of strategic views and river prospects, as identified in the Mayor’s London View Management Framework, including View 5A.1: Greenwich Park, View 6A.1 Blackheath, View 11B.1: London Bridge and View 11B.2: London Bridge. The site also falls within the wider setting of the Maritime Greenwich World Heritage Site. Details of the proposal 9 Full planning permission is sought for the comprehensive redevelopment of the site, retaining the Davenport House office building and Pepper St Ontiod pub, and comprising the construction of two new buildings of 25 and 30 storeys. The buildings would comprise 1,778 sq.m. of retail and nursery uses at ground floor, with 316 residential units above. The residential element comprises a mixture of private market and affordable housing. Improved public realm is also proposed, including an east-west route linking Millharbour with Glengall Bridge, as well as private amenity and play space. Case history 10 On 5 March 2015, the former Mayor considered a report on a previous planning application for the site (reference D&P/3474/01), which proposed a comprehensive redevelopment for three buildings up to 15 and 45 storeys comprising 484 residential units and ground floor commercial and community space. The former Mayor supported the principle of the development, but requested further information regarding affordable housing, strategic views, inclusive design, energy and transport. This application was subsequently withdrawn by the applicant prior to being considered by Tower Hamlets Council. 11 This current scheme differs from the previous scheme principally due to the retention of two of the existing buildings and the reconfiguration of the layout and scale of the development to accommodate them. This scheme has been the subject of pre-application discussions with GLA officers, over four meetings since May 2016. Strategic planning issues and relevant policies and guidance 12 The relevant issues and corresponding policies are as follows: Land use principle London Plan; Housing and affordable housing London Plan; Draft Affordable Housing & Viability SPG; Housing SPG; Housing Strategy; Providing for Children and Young People’s Play and Informal Recreation SPG; Social Infrastructure SPG; Urban design London Plan; Character and Context SPG; Tall buildings and heritage London Plan; London View management framework SPG, Character and Context SPG, World Heritage Sites SPG; Inclusive design London Plan; Accessible London: achieving an inclusive environment SPG; Sustainable development London Plan; Sustainable Design and Construction SPG; Mayor’s Climate Change Adaptation Strategy; Mayor’s Climate Change Mitigation and Energy Strategy; Mayor’s Water Strategy; Transport and parking London Plan; the Mayor’s Transport Strategy; Crossrail/CIL London Plan; Mayoral Community Infrastructure Levy; Crossrail SPG. page 3 13 For the purposes of Section 38(6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, the development plan in force for the area is the Tower Hamlets Core Strategy (2010) and Managing Development Document (2013), as well as the London Plan (Consolidated with Alterations since 2011). The Tower Hamlets Draft Local Plan (November 2016), the National Planning Policy Framework and Technical Guide to the National Planning Policy Framework, are also relevant material considerations. Land use principle 14 The site lies within the Isle of Dogs & South Poplar Opportunity Area, as identified in the London Plan. London Plan Policy 2.13, and Table A1.1, states that the Opportunity Area is capable of accommodating at least 10,000 homes, and 110,000 jobs up to 2031. An Opportunity Area Planning Framework (OAPF) is currently being produced by GLA and Tower Hamlets officers. The London Plan recognises that the north of the Isle of Dogs forms a strategically significant part of London’s world city offer for financial, media and business services, and that surplus business capacity south of Canary Wharf provides an opportunity to deliver new housing, and to support a wider mix of services for residents, workers and visitors. Furthermore, the site is not identified for employment use within the London Plan. Accordingly, the proposed mixed-use development, to include housing and commercial uses to serve the local population, is strongly supported in accordance with strategic planning policy. Housing Housing products and mix 15 The proposed residential mix is set out in the below table.
Recommended publications
  • The London Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 2017

    The London Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 2017

    The London Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 2017 Part of the London Plan evidence base COPYRIGHT Greater London Authority November 2017 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk More London London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries 020 7983 4100 minicom 020 7983 4458 Copies of this report are available from www.london.gov.uk 2017 LONDON STRATEGIC HOUSING LAND AVAILABILITY ASSESSMENT Contents Chapter Page 0 Executive summary 1 to 7 1 Introduction 8 to 11 2 Large site assessment – methodology 12 to 52 3 Identifying large sites & the site assessment process 53 to 58 4 Results: large sites – phases one to five, 2017 to 2041 59 to 82 5 Results: large sites – phases two and three, 2019 to 2028 83 to 115 6 Small sites 116 to 145 7 Non self-contained accommodation 146 to 158 8 Crossrail 2 growth scenario 159 to 165 9 Conclusion 166 to 186 10 Appendix A – additional large site capacity information 187 to 197 11 Appendix B – additional housing stock and small sites 198 to 202 information 12 Appendix C - Mayoral development corporation capacity 203 to 205 assigned to boroughs 13 Planning approvals sites 206 to 231 14 Allocations sites 232 to 253 Executive summary 2017 LONDON STRATEGIC HOUSING LAND AVAILABILITY ASSESSMENT Executive summary 0.1 The SHLAA shows that London has capacity for 649,350 homes during the 10 year period covered by the London Plan housing targets (from 2019/20 to 2028/29). This equates to an average annualised capacity of 64,935 homes a year.
  • Boats, Bangs, Bricks and Beer a Self-Guided Walk Along Faversham Creek

    Boats, Bangs, Bricks and Beer a Self-Guided Walk Along Faversham Creek

    Boats, bangs, bricks and beer A self-guided walk along Faversham Creek Explore a town at the head of a creek Discover how creek water influenced the town’s prosperity Find out about the industries that helped to build Britain .discoveringbritain www .org ies of our land the stor scapes throug discovered h walks 2 Contents Introduction 4 Route overview 5 Practical information 6 Detailed route maps 8 Commentary 10 Credits 38 © The Royal Geographical Society with the Institute of British Geographers, London, 2012 Discovering Britain is a project of the Royal Geographical Society (with IBG) The digital and print maps used for Discovering Britain are licensed to the RGS-IBG from Ordnance Survey 3 Boats, bangs, bricks and beer Discover how Faversham Creek helped to build Britain Faversham on the East Kent coast boasts the best-preserved medieval street in England, the country’s oldest brewery, helped us win the Battle of Trafalgar and has a justifiable claim to be ‘the town that built Britain’. So what’s it’s secret? Early settlers were the first to recognise its prime waterside location and a settlement quickly grew up here at the head of the navigable creek, with quick and easy access to Europe in one direction and London in the other. The soil around the creeks and rivers was rich and fertile, pure spring water was readily available from local aquifers, and the climate was dry and temperate. Sailing ships in Faversham Creek Caroline Millar © RGS-IBG Discovering Britain This gentle creekside walk takes you on a journey of discovery from the grand Victorian station through the medieval centre of town then out through its post-industrial edgelands to encounter the bleak beauty of the Kent marshes.
  • Feasibility Study for a Proposed Scottish Borders National Park 16 

    Feasibility Study for a Proposed Scottish Borders National Park 16 

    2017 | Feasibility study for a proposed Scottish Borders National Park 16 Feasibility study for a proposed Scottish Borders National Park First Bus © VisitScotland/Paul Tomkins Bluebells near Minto © Malcolm R Dickson Grass sledging at Born in the Borders © Duncan Bryden Prepared by Duncan Bryden – Bryden Associates 2017 | Feasibility study for a proposed Scottish Borders National Park 17 5. Todiscusstheprosandconsofwhere,in principle,theboundariesmightlie,andthe consequencesofincludingorexcluding 1 thetownsintheareawithinthedesignated NationalPark. Introduction 6. Togiveapreliminaryassessmentof proceduresandpossibletimescalesfor legislatingforandthenprocuringand implementingaproposedScottishBorders NationalPark. 7. Toadequatelyaddressthepointsraisedby ScottishBordersCouncil(seeAppendix7) andindicatewhereinthestudythesepoints are addressed. 1.3 Nonamehasbeenagreedfortheprojectand termslikeBordersNationalParkorSouthern 1.1 Thisindependentstudyhasbeen BordersNationalParkareworkingtitles.Itis commissionedbytheCampaignforaScottish acceptedthat‘AScottishBordersNational Borders NationalParktoexaminetheevidence Park’maybethenamethatdeliversthe forandfeasibilityoftheproposalthatanarea greatestbenefitstothewholearea. oftheScottishBordersbeformallyconsidered fordesignationasanewNationalPark. 1.4 Themapaccompanyingthestudybrief coversaproposedNationalParkareaof 1.2 TheCampaignforaScottishBordersNational approximately1000km2inthesouthern Parkidentifiedsevenobjectivesforthisstudy. sectionoftheScottishBordersCouncilarea comprisingTeviotandLiddesdale,Cheviot
  • Many Years a Member

    Many Years a Member

    The Talk on 6 October 2010 was by Malcolm Tucker, on Movable Bridges in London's Docks. Edward Sargent introduced Malcolm Tucker, who, as well as being our present Treasurer, has been a member of the group for many years and is a Civil Engineer and an expert in industrial history. Malcolm explained that movable bridges were needed in the docks, where entrance locks and passages presented obstacles to pedestrian and wheeled traffic. When walking over lock gates or going around the landward side was no longer feasible because of the size of the docks and the interruption of public roads, movable bridges were introduced. The Dutch used wooden bascule bridges with overhead counterbalances, but they had a limited span which was not sufficient for West Indiamen to pass through. In 1802, when the West India Docks first opened at Blackwall, requiring a span of 45 feet, Ralph Walker used two half swing bridges made of wood. Next, John Rennie at the London Docks installed the first cast-iron swing bridges. He used a long counterweight to counter-balance each leaf when it was swung, rotating on a pivot and a roller track, while the lower parts of the bridge became an arch when the two halves joined. He devised hinged legs that could be lowered by racks and pinions to ensure the arch was firmly seated. But later it was found, by careful attention to the fit of the parts, that a bridge could ease itself down onto fixed arch bearings when the bridge swung closed. It was important that there was a narrow gap around these bearings, curved in plan, while the bridge was being swung, to avoid frictional drag and wear.
  • Written Guide

    Written Guide

    Trains and boats and planes A self guided walk around the riverside and docks at North Woolwich Discover how a remote marsh became a gateway to the world Find out how waterways have influenced economic boom, decline and revival See how various transport networks have helped to transform the area Explore a landscape rapidly evolving through regeneration .discoveringbritain www .org ies of our land the stor scapes throug discovered h walks 2 Contents Introduction 4 Route overview 5 Practical information 6 Detailed route maps 8 Commentary 10 Further information 33 Credits 34 © The Royal Geographical Society with the Institute of British Geographers, London, 2014 Discovering Britain is a project of the Royal Geographical Society (with IBG) The digital and print maps used for Discovering Britain are licensed to the RGS-IBG from Ordnance Survey Cover image: University of East London campus buildings © Rory Walsh 3 Trains and boats and planes Explore the changing riverside and docks at North Woolwich For centuries the part of East London now known as North Woolwich was a remote marsh by the River Thames. Then from the 1840s it became a gateway to the world. Three new docks - Royal Victoria, Royal Albert and King George V - and the trades that grew around them transformed this area into the industrial heart of the world’s largest port. A busy day in King George V Dock (1965) But this success was not to last. © PLA / Museum of London When the docks closed in 1981 North Woolwich was left isolated and in decline. So a series of projects were established to revive the area, complete with new buildings and transport networks.
  • Countryside Access Improvement Plan 2007-2017

    Countryside Access Improvement Plan 2007-2017

    KENT COUNTY COUNCIL Countryside Access Improvement Plan 2007-2017 COUNTRYSIDE ACCESS IMPROVEMENT PLAN I 1 CONTENTS I Foreword 4 II Vision 5 1. Why Produce a Countryside Access Improvement Plan? 6 1.1 Introduction 7 1.2 The Plan 7 1.3 Methodology 7 2. Policy Context 9 2.1 Overview 10 2.2 Vision for Kent 11 2.3 Towards 2010 11 2.4 The Local Transport Plan 11 2.5 Walking Strategy 13 2.6 Cycling Strategy 13 2.7 Kent & Medway Structure Plan 13 2.8 South East Regional Plan 14 2.9 Kent Downs AONB Management Plan 14 2.10 Kent High Weald AONB Management Plan 15 3. Kent “The Garden of England” 16 3.1 A Picture of Kent 17 3.2 The Natural Environment and Heritage 17 3.3 Transport and Population 20 4. Current Access Provision in Kent 23 4.1 Public Rights of Way 24 4.2 Summary of Kent’s Rights of Way Network 25 4.3 Asset Statistics 25 4.4 Promoted Routes 28 4.5 The North Downs Way 29 4.6 Permissive Access 30 4.7 Roads 30 4.8 Accessible Green Space 30 4.9 Country Parks, Picnic Sites and Nature Reserves 31 4.10 Open Access 33 4.11 Village Greens and Commons 33 4.12 Woodland 33 4.13 Coastal 35 4.14 Riverside and Inland Water 36 5. Countryside Access Management 38 5.1 Kent County Council 39 5.2 District Councils 42 5.3 Parish Councils 42 5.4 Countryside Management Projects 42 5.5 Voluntary and Charity Sector 42 COUNTRYSIDE ACCESS IMPROVEMENT PLAN I 2 5.6 Neighbouring Authorities 43 5.7 Landowner Issues 44 6.
  • Tourism Strategy Everyone Who Lives, Works and Studies in the District Should Shift of Focus

    Tourism Strategy Everyone Who Lives, Works and Studies in the District Should Shift of Focus

    Destination whitecliffscountry Growth strategy for tourism and the visitor economy 2020 to 2030 Executive Summary May 2021, updated v3 Contents Our Mission Welcome 1 ‘To be a vibrant world-class destination valued for Foreword 2 its outstanding heritage, landscape and pursuits, Making the most of our coast and countryside 4 as well as its ease of access, warmth of welcome What we want to achieve 6 and wealth of opportunity.’ Measuring success 8 Objective 1: Ideas 10 The growth and success of tourism in White Cliffs Country Objective 2: People 12 is dependent on everyone working together to achieve Objective 3: Place 14 this common vision. Objective 4: Business Environment 16 Objective 5: Infrastructure 18 Addressing visitor trends and challenges 20 Tourism Making it happen - guiding principles 24 Dover District Council Action 26 Delivering Growth 28 is everyone s Appendix A – Context: ’ Overview of White Cliffs Country 30 business Appendix B – White Cliffs Country Brand 46 Appendix C - Destination Management and Marketing 53 Appendix D – Related Strategies, Plans and Policies 53 Appendix E - Destination Development 54 Consultation event with local stakeholders, Dover Athletic FC, March 2019 © English Heritage According to Visit England, we have three core tourist markets: Welcome EDINBURGH • ‘Country Loving 6 Traditionalist’ With its spectacular beaches and picturesque White Cliffs Country HOURS • ‘Free & Easy Mini- towns, White Cliffs Country is a unique ‘History and heritage, landscape and Breaker’ • ‘Fun in the Sun’ destination where coast meets countryside, nature, active pursuits.’ ancient meets modern, relaxation meets MANCHESTER Within a one-hour 4 4 adventure, and England meets Europe. With The ‘Character Towns’: HOURS HOURS LEEDS drive time we have a UK resident market in one of the most temperate climates in the Deal excess of 1.2 million UK, the district covers 123 square miles, with ‘A quaint, quirky and quintessentially BIRMINGHAM people living in 520,261 4 20 miles of coastline and beaches.
  • Appeal Decision

    Appeal Decision

    Appeal Decision Inquiry opened on 23 October 2018 Site visit made on 31 October and 9 November 2018 by Paul Jackson B Arch (Hons) RIBA an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government Decision date: 10th December 2018. Appeal Ref: APP/E5900/W/18/3194952 49-59 Millharbour, 2-4 Muirfield Crescent and 23-39 Pepper Street, London E14 9TD The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission. The appeal is made by Healey Development Solutions (Millharbour) Limited against the decision of the Council of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets. The application Ref PA/16/03518, dated 30 November 2016, was refused by notice dated 22 January 2018. The development proposed is demolition of existing buildings at 49-59 Millharbour, 2-4 Muirfield Crescent and 23-39 Pepper Street and comprehensive mixed use redevelopment including two buildings ranging from 26 storeys (90.05 metres (m) AOD) to 30 storeys (102.3 m AOD) in height, comprising 319 residential units (Class C3), 1,708 square metres (sqm) (GIA) of flexible non-residential floorspace (Classes A1, A3, A4 and D1), private and communal open spaces, car and cycle parking and associated landscaping and public realm works. Preliminary matters 1. The Inquiry sat for 6 days and closed on 31 October. I carried out a pre-Inquiry site visit on 22 October. An accompanied site visit was carried out on 31 October. The light was failing by the end of the day and the parties agreed that I could visit unaccompanied the view from the General Wolfe statue in Greenwich Park, within the Maritime Greenwich World Heritage Site (WHS).
  • Report No 648/00

    Report No 648/00

    REPORT NO 648/00 ANGUS COUNCIL ROADS COMMITTEE 8 JUNE 2000 SUSTRANS NATIONAL CYCLE ROUTE – GRAND OPENING 21 JUNE 2000 REPORT BY THE DIRECTOR OF ROADS ABSTRACT This report discusses the opening of the Sustrans National Cycle Route and requests authority to arrange two functions to mark the opening of the 5000-mile National Cycle Network. 1 RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that the Committee agree:- (i) to note the arrangements which are being made nationally, regionally and locally for the official opening of the National Cycle Network on 21 June 2000; (ii) to note that the unveiling of a milestone will be carried out at the Seven Arches Viaduct, Monifieth; (iii) to note that a refreshment stop will be provided in Carnoustie at 17.45hrs on Wednesday 21 June 2000 to welcome riders who are travelling the route and guests and that a milestone will be unveiled at this point; (iv) to note that the unveiling of a milestone will be carried out at the Signal Tower Museum, Arbroath; (v) that a reception be held in Montrose at 20.30hrs on the same day to which various dignitaries, guests and riders will be invited, and that a milestone will be unveiled at this event. 2 INTRODUCTION Report No. 98/00 by the Director of Roads and approved by the Roads Committee 27 January 2000 gave the latest situation regarding the Sustrans National Cycle Route 1 and the North Sea Cycle Route, both of which run through Angus, and an indication that some form of event to mark the opening was being considered.
  • Hornsea Project Four: Preliminary Environmental Information Report (PEIR)

    Hornsea Project Four: Preliminary Environmental Information Report (PEIR)

    Hornsea Project Four: Preliminary Environmental Information Report (PEIR) Volume 3, : Land Use and Agriculture Prepared Royal HaskoningDHV, 16 June 2019 Checked Anisha Lakhani, Orsted, 17 June 2019 Accepted Thomas Watts, Orsted, 18 July 2019 Approved Julian Carolan, Orsted, 19 July 2019 A3.6 Version A Table of Contents 6.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 6 6.2 Purpose ........................................................................................................................................................... 7 6.3 Planning and Policy Context ..................................................................................................................... 7 6.4 Consultation ............................................................................................................................................... 13 6.5 Study area ................................................................................................................................................... 18 6.6 Methodology to inform baseline ........................................................................................................... 20 6.7 Baseline environment ............................................................................................................................... 22 6.8 Project basis for assessment .................................................................................................................
  • Originator of Report: Allison De Marco

    Originator of Report: Allison De Marco

    PUBLIC ITEM 5 - APPENDIX 2 Originator of Report: Allison De Marco th Date: 5 August 2010 Proposed development Application Number: 10/90344/FULODA Site Plan © OS Crown Copyright. All rights reserved. ODA 100046062 Location: Olympic Park Delivery Zone 4; at the eastern end of Roach Road where it intersects with Monier Road and within the LB of Tower Hamlets. Olympic Park Delivery Zone 5; at the eastern end of Wallis Road and within the LB of Hackney. London Borough: Tower Hamlets and Hackney Proposal: Full planning application for the construction of two permanent pedestrian and cycle bridges (H10 and H14) for Post-Games Transformation phase. Applicants: Olympic Delivery Authority Agent: Arup (planning agent) and Allies & Morrison architects. 1. SUMMARY 1.1 This report considers a full planning application for the construction of two permanent pedestrian and cycle bridges for Post-Games transformation use; Bridge H10 located to the east of Wallis Road in Planning Delivery Zone 5 and Bridge H14 located to the east of Roach Road in Planning Delivery Zone 4. 1.2 The proposed bridges are located at the western extent of the 2007 Site Preparation and Olympic Facilities planning applications site and will provide new connections from the western communities in Hackney Wick and Fish Island across the Lea Navigation/Hackney Cut. 1.3 This report details a ‘slot-in’ application for full planning permission seeking approval for: o Preparatory works including bulk earthworks for the creation of landform to finished levels, including retaining structures and construction of piling and foundations; o The laying of surface water drainage; o Construction of bridge structure including abutments, retaining walls, bridge decks, parapets and handrails including material details; o Construction of approach ramps including the laying out of hard and soft landscaping including the installation of stairs, rest areas, parapet and handrails and planting of trees, climbers, lawn and meadow grass; o Construction of a lift at the western approach to Bridge H10.

  • Santander Cycles Leisure Routes

    Santander Cycles Leisure Routes S I LV E R T W O O W R N R E A S T I N D I A D O C K R O A D E E R L O W L E A C W H O A D R O S C Limehouse D O C K R S I N A DiscoverT the Isle I A of Dogs A S T I N D G Y U E CABLESTREET LIMEHOUSEBasin B SHADWELL , , LIMEH Y AY W A H E H I G H W , E , , T Westferry S W T Tower Hamlets P O P L A R H I G H S T R E E T East India I N N O D I A College E US D O C K A SP E L ) R OAD VER THAM L N E RI ES I N U N Museum K ( T of London Blackwall Ontario Docklands Poplar A S P E N WAY Tower S Crossrail I Pumphouse , West BLACKWALL L V Place E India Quay N R Educational Canary T O Museum , Cabot W Wharf Canada N R O A D Square D W R W Square T E A AY L E SA Canary O S Canary R T ROTHERHITHETUNNEL S F Wharf Wharf ’ E N Doubletree R North O Inter- R , , , T The O2 Docklands Y Heron Continental Greenwich S , M Nelson Dock R E Hotel A O Quays R R P A S , Bank Street Bacon’s D H Ravensbourne W A , College College L L Emirates CANARY WHARF Greenwich Peninsula Ecological South Quay Park M A R S H WA L L Pan Y M A Peninsula North W A Y WESTFERRY ROAD , L E N L ROTHERHITHE Greenwich A H , C Exchange D H N U E M Tower D S E S U R , T R E E SALTER ROAD LIMEHARBOUR Y R Q R U M O RIVER THAMES A , I L Y L A E S N D N R D I A , U Canada OA O M R Cubitt Town F W Water D R I F E D , Library A Surrey Quays R Y CUBITT B L Shopping Crossharbour A C Centre K W D TOWN , A MILLWALL A JOHN HARRISON WAY L Greenland O L Greenland R Dock Asda TU Y R 3 , N South Millwall Outer Dock R N E Holiday Inn F E Dock L Express Surrey S R O GROVE STREET EAST U Quays I T L O W E R R O A D Mudchute H V E P L O U G H WAY Park & Farm R E N Mudchute A B U P B U S H R D R HAWKSTONEROAD , NE P A R I D H T H E L O R E T , A A H L C O T O R H L H R Millwall Isle of Dogs A R A Park Police Station W E T K M , S C E A E C H L T N B R A U EVELYN STREET S W M N E D S George Green’s L T F E E Island School Y G , R R Key ’ RO Y St.