Boats, Bangs, Bricks and Beer a Self-Guided Walk Along Faversham Creek
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
24Th April APCM
ICKHAM & WELL PARISH COUNCIL Annual Parish Council Meeting (APCM) – 24th April 2017 at 7.30pm Minutes of meeting Present: Councillors J deGraft-Johnson (Chair), S Hipkin, K Richards, L Shouls, K Tatman. Public: 5 members of the public. 2017/001: Apologies Councillors P Hodges and G Wyant. Councillors M Northey and S Walker. 2017/002: Declarations of Interest There were none. 2017/003: Minutes of the meetings on 20th February and 20th March 2017 and the previous APCM on 18th April 2016 The minutes were all signed by Councillor deGraft-Johnson as true records. 2017/004: Matters arising Councillor deGraft-Johnson stated that any matters arising would be covered by items in the agenda and all agreed. 2017/005: Treasurer’s report 005/01: Councillor Hipkin distributed copies of the accounts for 2016-7 which showed receipts of £7,019.55 and expenditure of £4,472.29 for the year. He explained that it was necessary to set aside £1,200 pa for tree surgery on the trees protected under TPOs and to build up parish reserves. 005/02: Councillor Hipkin also reminded the meeting that it had been confirmed that it was not possible to claim costs for cutting the grass in the churchyard under the terms of CCF. Councillor deGraft-Johnson stated that the costs for the year 2016-7 would be met by the precept levy. Page 1 of 8 23/05/2017 2017/006: Revised Standing Orders In the absence of Councillor Hodges who had been handling this, the matter was deferred to the following meeting. -
Kent Archæological Society Library
http://kentarchaeology.org.uk/research/archaeologia-cantiana/ Kent Archaeological Society is a registered charity number 223382 © 2017 Kent Archaeological Society KENT ARCILEOLOGICAL SOCIETY LIBRARY SIXTH INSTALMENT HUSSEY MS. NOTES THE MS. notes made by Arthur Hussey were given to the Society after his death in 1941. An index exists in the library, almost certainly made by the late B. W. Swithinbank. This is printed as it stands. The number given is that of the bundle or box. D.B.K. F = Family. Acol, see Woodchurch-in-Thanet. Benenden, 12; see also Petham. Ady F, see Eddye. Bethersden, 2; see also Charing Deanery. Alcock F, 11. Betteshanger, 1; see also Kent: Non- Aldington near Lympne, 1. jurors. Aldington near Thurnham, 10. Biddend.en, 10; see also Charing Allcham, 1. Deanery. Appledore, 6; see also Kent: Hermitages. Bigge F, 17. Apulderfield in Cudham, 8. Bigod F, 11. Apulderfield F, 4; see also Whitfield and Bilsington, 7; see also Belgar. Cudham. Birchington, 7; see also Kent: Chantries Ash-next-Fawkham, see Kent: Holy and Woodchurch-in-Thanet. Wells. Bishopsbourne, 2. Ash-next-Sandwich, 7. Blackmanstone, 9. Ashford, 9. Bobbing, 11. at Lese F, 12. Bockingfold, see Brenchley. Aucher F, 4; see also Mottinden. Boleyn F, see Hever. Austen F (Austyn, Astyn), 13; see also Bonnington, 3; see also Goodneston- St. Peter's in Tha,net. next-Wingham and Kent: Chantries. Axon F, 13. Bonner F (Bonnar), 10. Aylesford, 11. Boorman F, 13. Borden, 11. BacIlesmere F, 7; see also Chartham. Boreman F, see Boorman. Baclmangore, see Apulderfield F. Boughton Aluph, see Soalcham. Ballard F, see Chartham. -
Autumn-2020.Pdf
Newsletter Keeping you in touch with your town council www.favershamtowncouncil.gov.uk Autumn 2020 Mayor’s Update A most wonderful day spent welcoming back our market stalls, businesses, traders and hospitality establishments after lockdown, to what is a very new normal; social distancing, the wearing of masks, no handshaking or hugging, who would have foreseen this situation a year ago? Many have seen the Mayor's ‘COVID-19 Thank You Awards’ being presented, some received with much emotion, a ‘thank you’ when not expected is always much appreciated. Mutual Aid and The Faversham Darts League provided instant help and support, among all the assistance given Faversham Darts League being presented with their ‘Covid-19 Thank by voluntary organisations and individuals. I cannot fail You Award’ by Cllr Alison Reynolds, Mayor of Faversham to mention the magnificent undertaking organised by West Faversham Community Association immediately it achieve a better balance for blue badge holders and a became clear the Centre would cease their normal proposal has been forwarded to Swale Borough Council which will be reviewed mid September. operations. Their CEO, James Browning, with the agreement of the Board of Trustees and in partnership We are fully aware that shopping habits have changed with Swale Borough Council funding, began to set up a before and during lockdown, with many shopping on- distribution centre for food and household essentials. line through Amazon and other businesses offering low Items began to be amassed and sorted into ‘7 day prices. I would encourage residents to support local packages’. Many local supermarkets, independent businesses through Autumn and Winter. -
The Trade of the Port of Faversham, 1650-1750
Archaeologia Cantiana Vol. 69 1955 THE TRADE OF THE PORT OP FAVERSHAM, 1650-1750 By J. H. ANDREWS IN the value of its trade, the size and number of its ships, and the geographical extent of its commercial connections the port of Faver- sham has never achieved more than minor importance, but in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries the total volume of its traffic placed it among the leading ports of Kent, and in certain branches of the coasting trade it had few rivals anywhere in England. In the following paragraphs an attempt is made to trace the development of Faversham in the period 1650-1750, using the series of Port Books in the Public Record Office.1 These documents, although they contain very detailed lists of vessels and cargoes entering and leaving the port, cannot be accepted at their face value as a comprehensive record of the trade of Faversham Creek; and before describing their contents it will be necessary to ascertain whether any other landing places besides ' Faversham itself were included in the books, and whether there were any kinds of maritime trade which were omitted from them. The Customs port of Faversham, as delimited by an Exchequer Commission of 1676,2 included a considerable portion of the Kentish coast, stretching from Milton in the west to the North Foreland in the east, but not all this coast was covered by the Faversham port books. The trade of Margate was always recorded in the Sandwich books8 and the Commissioners were almost certainly mistaken in extending the limits of Faversham as far east as the Foreland, while Milton, which seems to have been an independent Customs port at least until 1670,4 continued for another century to keep a separate set of port books, recording not only its own trade but also that of Conyer, Upchurch, Rainham and Otterham. -
Strategic Stone Study a Building Stone Atlas of Cambridgeshire (Including Peterborough)
Strategic Stone Study A Building Stone Atlas of Cambridgeshire (including Peterborough) Published January 2019 Contents The impressive south face of King’s College Chapel, Cambridge (built 1446 to 1515) mainly from Magnesian Limestone from Tadcaster (Yorkshire) and Kings Cliffe Stone (from Northamptonshire) with smaller amounts of Clipsham Stone and Weldon Stone Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 Cambridgeshire Bedrock Geology Map ........................................................................................................... 2 Cambridgeshire Superficial Geology Map....................................................................................................... 3 Stratigraphic Table ........................................................................................................................................... 4 The use of stone in Cambridgeshire’s buildings ........................................................................................ 5-19 Background and historical context ........................................................................................................................................................................... 5 The Fens ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 South -
New Electoral Arrangements for Swale Borough Council
Final recommendations New electoral arrangements for Swale Borough Council August 2012 Contents Summary 1 1 Introduction 3 2 Analysis and final recommendations 5 Submissions received 6 Electorate figures 6 Council size 6 Electoral fairness 7 General analysis 7 Electoral arrangements 8 Sittingbourne area 8 Isle of Sheppey 10 Faversham area 11 Conclusions 12 Parish electoral arrangements 13 3 What happens next? 15 4 Mapping 17 Appendices A Glossary and abbreviations 18 B Table B1: Final recommendations for Swale Borough 21 Council Summary The Local Government Boundary Commission for England (LGBCE) is an independent body that conducts electoral reviews of local authority areas. The broad purpose of an electoral review is to decide on the appropriate electoral arrangements – the number of councillors, and the names, number and boundaries of wards or divisions – for a specific local authority. We are conducting an electoral review of Swale Borough Council to provide improved levels of electoral equality across the authority. The review aims to ensure that the number of voters represented by each councillor is approximately the same. The Commission commenced the review in May 2011. This review is being conducted as follows: Stage starts Description 14 November 2011 Information gathering – Council invited to submit proposals for warding arrangements to LGBCE 10 January 2012 LGBCE’s analysis and formulation of draft recommendations 2 April 2012 Publication of draft recommendations and consultation on them 9 June 2012 Analysis of submissions received and formulation of final recommendations Draft recommendations We proposed a council size of 47 comprising five single-member wards, 15 two- member wards and four three-member wards. -
Andrew Ireland, Corporate Director, Social Care, Health and Wellbeing To
From: Andrew Ireland, Corporate Director, Social Care, Health and Wellbeing To: Graham Gibbens, Cabinet Member for Adult Social Care and Public Health Decision No: 14/00082 Subject: Outcome of formal consultation on the closure/variation of Service of Swale Learning Disability Day Service Classification: Unrestricted th Past Pathway: Social Care Health and Well-beingnd Cabinet Committee – 26 September 2014DMT on 2 September 2014 Electoral Division: Swale Summary : A report on the outcome of formal consultation undertaken at Swale Learning Disability Day Service and seeking Cabinet Member approval to proceed with moving from the existing base of the Faversham Day Service, at Lower Road, Faversham and the reconfiguration or moving from the existing base of the Crawford Centre, Edenbridge Drive, Sheerness, Isle of Sheppey; to a more accessible community based service model. Recommendations: The Cabinet Member for Adult Social Care and Public Health is asked to AGREE: 1) To change the Swale Learning Disability Day Services to a community hub based model as outlined in the attached report, subject to the current service being maintained until the replacements are up and running. 2) To utilise the identified capital money to obtain dedicated spaces within community hub buildings in Faversham, Sheerness and Sittingbourne, with the proposal of: • two sensory multi-use spaces • two adult changing places • enhanced accessible features Where community hubs are in a non KCC building there will be a capital grant agreement drawn up to protect KCC’s investment and ensure a rent free period. 3) That the Corporate Director for Social Care, Health & Wellbeing, or other delegated officer, to undertake the necessary actions to implement this decision. -
Feasibility Study for a Proposed Scottish Borders National Park 16
2017 | Feasibility study for a proposed Scottish Borders National Park 16 Feasibility study for a proposed Scottish Borders National Park First Bus © VisitScotland/Paul Tomkins Bluebells near Minto © Malcolm R Dickson Grass sledging at Born in the Borders © Duncan Bryden Prepared by Duncan Bryden – Bryden Associates 2017 | Feasibility study for a proposed Scottish Borders National Park 17 5. Todiscusstheprosandconsofwhere,in principle,theboundariesmightlie,andthe consequencesofincludingorexcluding 1 thetownsintheareawithinthedesignated NationalPark. Introduction 6. Togiveapreliminaryassessmentof proceduresandpossibletimescalesfor legislatingforandthenprocuringand implementingaproposedScottishBorders NationalPark. 7. Toadequatelyaddressthepointsraisedby ScottishBordersCouncil(seeAppendix7) andindicatewhereinthestudythesepoints are addressed. 1.3 Nonamehasbeenagreedfortheprojectand termslikeBordersNationalParkorSouthern 1.1 Thisindependentstudyhasbeen BordersNationalParkareworkingtitles.Itis commissionedbytheCampaignforaScottish acceptedthat‘AScottishBordersNational Borders NationalParktoexaminetheevidence Park’maybethenamethatdeliversthe forandfeasibilityoftheproposalthatanarea greatestbenefitstothewholearea. oftheScottishBordersbeformallyconsidered fordesignationasanewNationalPark. 1.4 Themapaccompanyingthestudybrief coversaproposedNationalParkareaof 1.2 TheCampaignforaScottishBordersNational approximately1000km2inthesouthern Parkidentifiedsevenobjectivesforthisstudy. sectionoftheScottishBordersCouncilarea comprisingTeviotandLiddesdale,Cheviot -
Written Guide
Trains and boats and planes A self guided walk around the riverside and docks at North Woolwich Discover how a remote marsh became a gateway to the world Find out how waterways have influenced economic boom, decline and revival See how various transport networks have helped to transform the area Explore a landscape rapidly evolving through regeneration .discoveringbritain www .org ies of our land the stor scapes throug discovered h walks 2 Contents Introduction 4 Route overview 5 Practical information 6 Detailed route maps 8 Commentary 10 Further information 33 Credits 34 © The Royal Geographical Society with the Institute of British Geographers, London, 2014 Discovering Britain is a project of the Royal Geographical Society (with IBG) The digital and print maps used for Discovering Britain are licensed to the RGS-IBG from Ordnance Survey Cover image: University of East London campus buildings © Rory Walsh 3 Trains and boats and planes Explore the changing riverside and docks at North Woolwich For centuries the part of East London now known as North Woolwich was a remote marsh by the River Thames. Then from the 1840s it became a gateway to the world. Three new docks - Royal Victoria, Royal Albert and King George V - and the trades that grew around them transformed this area into the industrial heart of the world’s largest port. A busy day in King George V Dock (1965) But this success was not to last. © PLA / Museum of London When the docks closed in 1981 North Woolwich was left isolated and in decline. So a series of projects were established to revive the area, complete with new buildings and transport networks. -
Highwell House NR CROWBOROUGH, EAST SUSSEX
Highwell House NR CROWBOROUGH, EAST SUSSEX Highwell House NR CROWBOROUGH, EAST SUSSEX A superbly renovated country house with stunning views over the East Sussex countryside Accommodation and Amenities Reception hall • Drawing room • Dining room • Sitting room • Kitchen/breakfast room Family room • Study • Utility room • Cloakroom • Cellar Master bedroom suite with dressing room • 6 further bedrooms • 6 further bathrooms (4 en-suite) • Lookout room Staff bedroom, bathroom and sitting room / kitchen, laundry room Triple garage block • Studio / games room • Stables • Derelict oast house • Derelict greenhouse with cellar Beautiful gardens and grounds • Pond • Paddock Gross internal area: Main house: 839 sq.m (9,028 sq.ft.) Studio / games room: 42 sq.m (452 sq ft) Stables: 38 sq.m (409 sq ft) Garage: 47 sq.m (506 sq ft) Derelict buildings: 153 sq.m (1,646 sq ft) Total: 1,119 sq.m (12,041 sq ft) In all about 13 acres Knight Frank LLP Knight Frank LLP Churchill House, 55 Baker Street, 85 Mount Pleasant Road, London W1U 8AN Tunbridge Wells, Kent TN1 1PX Tel: +44 20 7861 1552 Tel: +44 1892 515035 [email protected] [email protected] www.knightfrank.co.uk These particulars are intended only as a guide and must not be relied upon as statements of fact. Your attention is drawn to the Important Notice on the last page of the brochure. Situation (All distances and times are approximate) S • Crowborough 2.9 miles • Tunbridge Wells 9 miles • Central London 48 miles • Crowborough train station 1.6 miles - T London Bridge from 68 -
Countryside Access Improvement Plan 2007-2017
KENT COUNTY COUNCIL Countryside Access Improvement Plan 2007-2017 COUNTRYSIDE ACCESS IMPROVEMENT PLAN I 1 CONTENTS I Foreword 4 II Vision 5 1. Why Produce a Countryside Access Improvement Plan? 6 1.1 Introduction 7 1.2 The Plan 7 1.3 Methodology 7 2. Policy Context 9 2.1 Overview 10 2.2 Vision for Kent 11 2.3 Towards 2010 11 2.4 The Local Transport Plan 11 2.5 Walking Strategy 13 2.6 Cycling Strategy 13 2.7 Kent & Medway Structure Plan 13 2.8 South East Regional Plan 14 2.9 Kent Downs AONB Management Plan 14 2.10 Kent High Weald AONB Management Plan 15 3. Kent “The Garden of England” 16 3.1 A Picture of Kent 17 3.2 The Natural Environment and Heritage 17 3.3 Transport and Population 20 4. Current Access Provision in Kent 23 4.1 Public Rights of Way 24 4.2 Summary of Kent’s Rights of Way Network 25 4.3 Asset Statistics 25 4.4 Promoted Routes 28 4.5 The North Downs Way 29 4.6 Permissive Access 30 4.7 Roads 30 4.8 Accessible Green Space 30 4.9 Country Parks, Picnic Sites and Nature Reserves 31 4.10 Open Access 33 4.11 Village Greens and Commons 33 4.12 Woodland 33 4.13 Coastal 35 4.14 Riverside and Inland Water 36 5. Countryside Access Management 38 5.1 Kent County Council 39 5.2 District Councils 42 5.3 Parish Councils 42 5.4 Countryside Management Projects 42 5.5 Voluntary and Charity Sector 42 COUNTRYSIDE ACCESS IMPROVEMENT PLAN I 2 5.6 Neighbouring Authorities 43 5.7 Landowner Issues 44 6. -
Tourism Strategy Everyone Who Lives, Works and Studies in the District Should Shift of Focus
Destination whitecliffscountry Growth strategy for tourism and the visitor economy 2020 to 2030 Executive Summary May 2021, updated v3 Contents Our Mission Welcome 1 ‘To be a vibrant world-class destination valued for Foreword 2 its outstanding heritage, landscape and pursuits, Making the most of our coast and countryside 4 as well as its ease of access, warmth of welcome What we want to achieve 6 and wealth of opportunity.’ Measuring success 8 Objective 1: Ideas 10 The growth and success of tourism in White Cliffs Country Objective 2: People 12 is dependent on everyone working together to achieve Objective 3: Place 14 this common vision. Objective 4: Business Environment 16 Objective 5: Infrastructure 18 Addressing visitor trends and challenges 20 Tourism Making it happen - guiding principles 24 Dover District Council Action 26 Delivering Growth 28 is everyone s Appendix A – Context: ’ Overview of White Cliffs Country 30 business Appendix B – White Cliffs Country Brand 46 Appendix C - Destination Management and Marketing 53 Appendix D – Related Strategies, Plans and Policies 53 Appendix E - Destination Development 54 Consultation event with local stakeholders, Dover Athletic FC, March 2019 © English Heritage According to Visit England, we have three core tourist markets: Welcome EDINBURGH • ‘Country Loving 6 Traditionalist’ With its spectacular beaches and picturesque White Cliffs Country HOURS • ‘Free & Easy Mini- towns, White Cliffs Country is a unique ‘History and heritage, landscape and Breaker’ • ‘Fun in the Sun’ destination where coast meets countryside, nature, active pursuits.’ ancient meets modern, relaxation meets MANCHESTER Within a one-hour 4 4 adventure, and England meets Europe. With The ‘Character Towns’: HOURS HOURS LEEDS drive time we have a UK resident market in one of the most temperate climates in the Deal excess of 1.2 million UK, the district covers 123 square miles, with ‘A quaint, quirky and quintessentially BIRMINGHAM people living in 520,261 4 20 miles of coastline and beaches.