DOCSLIB.ORG

MAINTAINING HISTORY: MUSEUM FACILITIES MANAGEMENT at HISTORIC SITES a Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of San Francisco State

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MAINTAINING HISTORY: MUSEUM FACILITIES MANAGEMENT at HISTORIC SITES a Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of San Francisco State MAINTAINING HISTORY: MUSEUM FACILITIES MANAGEMENT AT HISTORIC SITES A Thesis submitted to the faculty of San Francisco State University In partial fulfillment of 'Z® I & the requirements for U *T the Degree , w Master of Arts In Museum Studies by Edward Michael Collins San Francisco, California May 2018 Copyright by Edward Michael Collins 2018 CERTIFICATION OF APPROVAL I certify that I have read Maintaining History: Museum Facilities Management at Historic Sites by Edward Michael Collins, and that in my opinion this work meets the criteria for approving a thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree Master of Arts in Museum Studies at San Francisco State University. idward Luby, Ph.D. Professor of Museum Studies Julie-Bly DeVere Lecturer of Museum Studies MAINTAINING HISTORY: MUSEUM FACILITIES MANAGEMENT AT HISTORIC SITES Edward Michael Collins San Francisco, California 2018 Facilities management is vital to museums that are associated with historic sites, yet it is often overlooked by the museum community. Maintaining the most important asset of these museums, the site itself, is essential for the continued existence of these historically valuable locations. In this thesis, the role of the Facilities Manager is examined by defining the responsibilities of facilities management and characterizing the status of facilities management at historic sites. A survey of 150 historic sites in the United States was conducted, resulting in a response rate of 31%. After a discussion, a set of conclusions and recommendations are presented. It is concluded that facilities management at museums that are associated with historic sites is a complex responsibility, which is often not performed by dedicated staff, and that professionalizing facilities management requires more attention from the museum community, additional research, and the integration of useful resources. I certify that the Abstract is a correct representation of the content of this thesis. Date ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis could not have been completed without the unwavering support and guidance of Dr. Edward Luby, the wonderful feedback and support from Julie DeVere, as well as the irreplaceable guidance from Dr. Jean DeMouthe. A special thank you to my mother, who’s proofreading skills are second to none, and my good friends Jesus Ramirez and Corrie Thompson who helped keep me on task. Additional thanks go to my colleagues at the San Mateo County Historical Association: Director Mitch Postel, Deputy Director Carmen Blair, Curator Dana Neitzel, and Bookkeeper Susan Smith, who provided inspiration and support. This thesis is dedicated to my wife, Julia Collins, who gave me unconditional love, support, inspiration, and put up with all the late nights and weekends. v TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables............................................................................................................................ix List of Figures............................................................................................................................x List of Appendices.................................................................................................................. xii Chapter 1: Maintaining History................................................................................................1 Chapter 2: Historic Site: National, State, and Local Resources ...........................................5 Introduction....................................................................................................................5 Federal Laws..................................................................................................................5 National Register of Historic Places.......................................................................... 7 Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines ............................................... 7 National Park Service ..................................................................................................9 Advisory Council on Historic Preservation...............................................................9 State Resources........................................................................................................ 10 Local Resources......................................................................................................... 10 Conclusion..................................................................................................................12 Chapter 3: Facilities Management Responsibilities ............................................................ 13 Introduction..................................................................................................................13 Operations Overview..................................................................................................13 Integrated Pest Management...................................................................................... 14 Fire................................................................................................................................16 Security........................................................................................................................ 19 Emergency Preparedness........................................................................................... 21 Professionalization......................................................................................................22 Conclusion...................................................................................................................24 Chapter 4: Historic Site Facilities Management Requirements...........................................25 Introduction................................................................................................................. 25 What are Historic Structures/Sites.............................................................................25 Historic Site-Specific Requirements......................................................................... 26 Accessibility............................................................................................................... 29 Conclusion...................................................................................................................32 Chapter 5: Methods..................................................................................................................33 Introduction..................................................................................................................33 Literature Review Description...................................................................................34 Survey Description.....................................................................................................36 Summary......................................................................................................................45 Chapter 6: Survey Results......................................................................................................46 Introduction................................................................................................................. 46 Survey Results............................................................................................................ 47 Demographics............................................................................................................. 48 Operations....................................................................................................................54 Specific Duties............................................................................................................ 60 Documents & Policy...................................................................................................68 Conclusion...................................................................................................................74 Chapter 7: Discussion............................................................................................................. 75 Introduction..................................................................................................................75 vii Demographics of Respondents..................................................................................75 Professional Memberships......................................................................................... 76 Facilities Management Responsibilities................................................................... 77 Policies and Documentation...................................................................................... 78 Accessibility................................................................................................................80 Unfulfilled Facilities Needs............................................................................. 80 Summary......................................................................................................................81 Chapter 8: Conclusions and Recommendations................................................................... 82 Introduction..................................................................................................................82 Conclusions..................................................................................................................82 Recommendations.......................................................................................................87 Final Thoughts...........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • National Register of Historic Places Inventory—Nomination Form 1
    FHR-8-300 (11-78) United States Department of the Interior Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service National Register of Historic Places Inventory—Nomination Form See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries—complete applicable sections________________ 1. Name__________________ historic Waterford Historic District______________" : ' . and/or common______________________________________ 2. Location street & number Routes 35 and 37 not for publication city, town Waterford ^_ vicinity of____congressional district Second state Maine code 023 county Oxford code 017 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use A district ^ public ^ occupied _X _ agriculture museum building(s) X private unoccupied _X _ commercial park structure both work in progress _X _ educational A private residence site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment X religious object in process yes: restricted X government scientific being considered X yes: unrestricted industrial transportation . ;,no .-. :.. « - military .other: 4. Owner of Property name Multiple Ofrniership (see continuation sheet) street & number city, town vicinity of state 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Oxford County Registry of Deeds street & number city, town South Paris, state Maine 6. Representation in Existing Surveys title has this property been determined elegible? __ yes no date federal __ state __ county local depository for survey records city, town state 7. Description Condition Check one Check one X excellent
    [Show full text]
  • September 2009
    September 2009 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Introducing Our New Devotion House Curator/Caretakers Camille Arbogast & Jesus MacLean are very excited to begin working & living at the Devotion House as co-curators & caretakers. Camille is a Lead Guide for Historic New England at the 1796 Otis House. She's worked for Gore Place in Waltham, the Newton Historical Society, and the Browne House in Watertown. She wrote and leads walking tours of the old Norumbega Amusement park in Newton, performs occasionally as Mary Stone-- an 1806 maid-- and lectures on architect/designer Ogden Codman, Jr. She loves history-- and sharing what she's passionate about with others. She looks forward to caring for the collection at the Devotion House, increasing visitation, and helping with the Society's programs. Jesus, raised in Brookline, is also a Lead Guide for Historic New England-- he works at the 1937 Walter Gropius House in Lincoln. He also assists at the Browne House in Watertown and the Codman Estate in Lincoln. He is passionate about libraries and information, and looks forward to continuing to catalogue the collection at the Devotion House, as well as assisting with cataloguing the Brookline Historical Society's archives. He worked with Political Research Associates in Somerville as a library intern last winter and spring. He is also an architectural history buff and thrilled to be living in an 1740s house. He has already started helping board members Jean Stringham and Holly Hartman work in the yard at the Devotion House, as gardening is another one of his interests. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Historical Society September/October Open Houses The Edward Devotion House will be open for tours from noon to 3 pm on the following Sundays this fall: September 21st, October 5th, and October 19th.
    [Show full text]
  • H. H. Richardson's House for Reverend Browne, Rediscovered
    H. H. Richardson’s House for Reverend Browne, Rediscovered mark wright Wright & Robinson Architects Glen Ridge, New Jersey n 1882 Henry Hobson Richardson completed a mod- flowering, brief maturity, and dissemination as a new Amer- est shingled cottage in the town of Marion, overlook- ican vernacular. To abbreviate Scully’s formulation, the Iing Sippican Harbor on the southern coast of Shingle Style was a fusion of imported strains of the Eng- Massachusetts (Figure 1). Even though he had only seen it lish Queen Anne and Old English movements with a con- in a sadly diminished, altered state and shrouded in vines, in current revival of interest in the seventeenth-century 1936 historian Henry-Russell Hitchcock would neverthe- colonial building tradition in wood shingles, a tradition that less proclaim, on the walls of the Museum of Modern Art survived at that time in humble construction up and down (MoMA) in New York, that the structure was “perhaps the the New England seaboard. The Queen Anne and Old most successful house ever inspired by the Colonial vernac- English were both characterized by picturesque massing, ular.”1 The alterations made shortly after the death of its the elision of the distinction between roof and wall through first owner in 1901 obscured the exceptional qualities that the use of terra-cotta “Kent tile” shingles on both, the lib- marked the house as one of Richardson’s most thoughtful eral use of glass, and dynamic planning that engaged func- works; they also caused it to be misunderstood—in some tionally complex houses with their landscapes.
    [Show full text]
  • Searchable PDF Document
    This file may be searchable, depending on the operating system, browser and PDF viewer in use. Nov 1879 – Oct 1880 - Watertown Enterprise 11/12/1879 p.4 General Tom Thumb to entertain at Town Hall p.4 Story of new American Shade Company on Fayette St. 11/19/1879 p.3 Story on how Watertown is careless about its history 11/26/1879 p.3 Emery Mayo building new rental house on Walnut St. 12/03/1879 p.3 Two new streetlights on Arlington St. 12/10/1879 p.3 Town meeting on bringing in new water supply p.3 Alfred Hosmer purchases land and buildings on River St. for $1500 12/31/1879 p.3 George March presented with bronze statuary 1/28/1880 p.3 Annual report shows 86 deaths & 106 births 2/04/1880 p.2 Essays about Watertown history written by 13-year-old students p.4 Ad for a horse dentist 2/25/1880 Story about the advantages of being an “old maid” 3/31/1880 p.4 Part of Watertown annexed to Newton 4/14/1880 p.2 Railroad extended between Watertown & Newton p.3 Board of Health examines wells due to 3 children dying in one family of diphtheria 4/28/1880 p.3 Fire at Aetna Mills tenement building. First time fire alarm box was used 5/05/1880 p.2 P.T. Barnum circus ad p.4 Old fire horse “Jim” retires p.5 Mrs. Harrington attempts suicide for 3rd time 5/26/1880 Story on women gamblers 6/02/1880 p.3 Lighting of streets at night being copied by other towns 6/09/1880 p.2 Story on Walker & Pratt Company 6/16/1880 p.2 Story on Lewando’s French Dye House p.3 Strawberry Festival 7/14/1880 Aaron Burr love story p.3 Galen St.
    [Show full text]
  • Watertown on the Charles
    TOWNBON THE ,RLES T. BURKE / W E (' A M B R ID G E M f / r / i r ' F r e s h yATEftJj, HIST 974.443 BUR Town of Watertown 350th Ai Celebration Committee 1980 Watertown Horse Car Line, circa 1857. Preface In 1979, the Annual Town Meeting created the 350th Anniversary Celebration Committee, charged with designing an appropriate celebration of Watertown’s 350th birthday. The names of the members of the Committee are printed elsewhere in this booklet. The Committee has planned a Homecoming Ball, a mammoth parade, regattas, a picnic, and a party honoring the descendants of the town’s founders to take place at the Gore Estate during the anniversary year. During the month of June, 1980, the Selectmen will proclaim a month of official celebration in which everyone can participate. School, libraries, churches, town organization, civic groups, and local businesses will all share in some phase of the festivities. The Committee, desiring some permanent record of this important date in Watertown’s history to stand for future generations, asked Charles Burke, well-known local historian and long-time trustee of the Watertown Free Public Library, to write a short history of the Town. Watertown, the first inland town to be settled in Massachusetts, sent many of its sons and daughters forth to found other cities and towns. Watertown thus became known as “ The Mother Town.” We are proud of her history. The Committee thanks Charles Burke for his contribution to our 350th Anniversary Celebration, and hopes that Watertown’s sons and daughters enjoy reading this account of the growth and development of their home town.
    [Show full text]
  • Quincy Homestead NHL Nomination
    NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATION NPS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 QUINCY HOMESTEAD Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1. NAME OF PROPERTY Historic Name: Quincy Homestead Other Name/Site Number: Dorothy Quincy House 2. LOCATION Street & Number: 34 Butler Road Not for publication: City/Town: Quincy Vicinity: State: Massachusetts County: Norfolk Code: 025 Zip Code: 02169-2212 3. CLASSIFICATION Ownership of Property Category of Property Private: Building(s): X Public-Local: District: Public-State: X Site: Public-Federal: Structure: Object: Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing 1 1 buildings sites structures objects 1 1 Total Number of Contributing Resources Previously Listed in the National Register: 1 Name of Related Multiple Property Listing: Quincy Multiple Resource Area (1991) NPS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 QUINCY HOMESTEAD Page 2 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 4. STATE/FEDERAL AGENCY CERTIFICATION As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this ____ nomination ____ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property ____ meets ____ does not meet the National Register Criteria. Signature of Certifying Official Date State or Federal Agency and Bureau In my opinion, the property ____ meets ____ does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • American Architecture 1600-1860 Fall 2008 Prof
    American Architecture 1600-1860 Fall 2008 Prof. Longstreth S T U D Y A I D FIRST PERIOD ARCHITECTURE IN NEW ENGLAND * Boardman house, Saugus, Mass., ca. 1687; lean-to add. before 1696 * Fairbanks house, Dedham, Mass., ca. 1637; lean-to add. before 1668, adds. 18c * Capen house, Topsfield, Mass., 1683 Browne house, Watertown, Mass., between 1694-1701 Revere house, Boston, ca. 1680; reconstructed early 20c * Whipple house, Ipswich, Mass., ca. 1665; adds. before 1683 Old Feather Store, Boston, 1680; demolished Corwin house, Salem, ca. 1675 Turner house, Salem, ca. 1668; adds. 17c Browne house, Watertown, Mass., between 1694-1701; adds. 18c Stanley house, Farmington, Conn., late 17/early 18cs Coffin house, Newbury, Mass., ca. 1654 Swett-Isley house, Newbury, ca. 1670 Gedney house, Salem, ca. 1665 Arnold house, Lincoln, R.I., ca. 1687 Whitfield house, Guilford, 1639 * First Meeting House, West Springfield, Mass., 1702; destroyed Second (Old Ship) Meeting House, Hingham, Mass., 1681; later adds./alts. * Friends Meeting House, Newport, 1699, 1729, 1807 Meeting House, Cumberland, R.I., ca. 1740; destroyed 1 FIREST PERIOD ARCHITECTURE IN THE CHESAPEAKE REGION St. John's Manor, St. Mary's City, Md., 1638; alts./adds. prob. 1662; destroyed Cedar Park, Ann Arundel County, Md., 1702; destroyed Middle Plantation, Ann Arundel County, first buildings late 17c.; destroyed King's Mill plantation, James County, Va., first buildings begun ca. 1625; destroyed * Bacon's Castle, Surry County, Va., 1665; later adds. * Thoroughgood house, Virginia Beach, Va., ca. 1700 Lyndhaven, Virginia Beach, ca. 1725-1730 * St. Luke's Church, Isle of Wight County, Va., between ca. 1680-1720 DUTCH COLONIAL ARCHITECTURE IN NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY Nichols Vechte (Old Stone) house, Brooklyn, 1699; reconst.
    [Show full text]
  • Cfo Coton €Rie/- ■ 1
    \ Cfo Coton €rie/- ■ 1 .... 1—-UL1ZS— g* The Newsletter of the Historical Society of Watertown 28 Marshall Street Watertown, MA 02472-3408 www.HistoricWatertown.org 617-923-6067 Edmund Fowle House - 1772 January 2010 BOSTON POST CANE PRESENTED TO WATERTOWN’S OLDEST FEMALE CITIZEN As reported in our July 2009, Watertown’s Watertown for over 40 years. She is the mother of Boston Post Cane has been returned to Watertown. Adeline of Watertown, a retired Brookline teacher, As a result of fundraising by Charles Morash and Louis A. of Needham, a retired Boston journalist, and Ron Ohanian it was purchased from an antiques mother-in-law of Elizabeth M. dealer in Delaware. Misters Morash and Ohanian presented it, in a display case for safekeeping, to the Historical Society in a ceremony last April, along with 2 replica canes, to be presented to the oldest female and oldest male citizens of Watertown. The Historical Society and Historical Commission presented one of the replica canes to Watertown’s oldest female citizen, Adeline M. Dilorio, in a ceremony on September 27. It was mentioned that Ms. Dilorio was 5 years old when the first Boston Post Cane was presented. The ceremony and reception was attended by members of the Dilorio family, the Historical Society and the Historical Commission. The following comments were provided by the family and read before the gathering. Boston Post Cane recipient Adeline Dilorio seated in front o f her son Louis, daughter-in-law Elizabeth and Adeline M. Dilorio, a resident of Watertown daughter Adeline. and Bradford Road for more than 80 years, turns 106 on November 19.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes Watertown Historical Commission Thursday, April 11, 2013 Watertown Lower Hearing Room 7:00Pm Adopted July 11, 2013
    Minutes Watertown Historical Commission Thursday, April 11, 2013 Watertown Lower Hearing Room 7:00pm Adopted July 11, 2013 Historical Commission Members Present: David J. Russo, J. B. Jones, Marilynne K. Roach, Thomas Melone, Susan T. Steele, Elisabeth H. Loukas, Donald S. Berg Staff Present: Christopher J. Hayward, Daphne M. Collins Public Present: See attached Sign-In Form _______________________________________________________________ David Russo chaired. The meeting opened at 7:00p.m. 1. Public Hearing of Landmark Designation – 917 Belmont Street The Public Hearing is a result of the Walker School’s Petition for the Historic Landmark Designation accepted by the HC last month. A Landmark Designation Report was prepared in compliance to the Landmark Ordinance. Robert Jackson, 354 Lexington Street, expressed his appreciation for the proposed Landmarking of 917 Belmont Street. He was concerned about the continued deterioration of 917 Belmont Street and the impact on abutting property values. Joyce Kelly, representative of the Historical Society of Watertown, said she was sad to see the loss of Section 2 of the property. Jones hoped that the Report will have provisions to stabilize the property as fundraising goes forward. He regretted the loss of Section 2. In response to Steele’s concerns, Russo reported that the Section VII – Demolition allows for the petition of a demolition which will then be evaluated by the HC. The HC has the authority to reject the demolition request. Melone was gratified that the Landmarking will require HC review to preserve and protect the main building from inappropriate changes. Russo asserted that the HC will have authority to engage in future projects and applicants.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Newsletter (PDF)
    Fall 2015, Volume 22 UVM HISTORIC PRESERVATION PROGRAM NEWSLETTER UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT HISTORIC PRESERVATION PROGRAM HISTORY DEPARTMENT - WHEELER HOUSE - BURLINGTON, VERMONT IN THIS ISSUE: IN PRAISE OF PRESERVATION BY JULIA GREY SUMMER INTERNSHIPS PAGE 1 GREETINGS PAGE 2 THOMAS VISSER RECEIVES PROMOTION PAGE 5 FIELD SCHOOL IN PRESERVATION PHILOSOPHY AND PRACTICE PAGE 5 IN PRAISE OF PRESERVATION PAGE 6 ROBERT MCCULLOUGH DISCUSSES HIS NEW BOOK HP 206 class visiting 12 Colchester Avenue, one of the oldest buildings in Burlington PAGE 7 Each fall, Professor Visser’s HP 206 course on Researching Historic Structures CLASS TRIP TO THE AARCH and Sites elicits great discoveries, as students engage in uncovering clues from PAGE 8 the past to compare and contrast with present-day context. (story on page 6) THE SECOND YEAR CLASS UMMER NTERNSHIPS PAGE 9 S I Barbara Bosworth (right) was a summer intern WHAT A PANE IN THE GLASS! in the Lake Champlain Maritime Museum’s PAGE 11 archaeology conservation lab. She worked with second-year student Paul Willard Gates and an THE INCOMING CLASS PAGE 12 intern from the nautical archaeology graduate program at Texas A&M University. Barbara GREEN MOUNTAIN worked to conserve 19th-century crosscut saws, NATIONAL FOREST an 18th-century anchor, wrought iron nails from PAGE 14 barges abandoned in Missisquoi Bay, lead arti- facts recovered from Revolutionary War and War ALUMNI SPOTLIGHT PAGE 15 of 1812 shipwrecks, and began documenting a collection of shipwright tools. Her favorite activities were photographing lab work, drafting artifacts, and talking with the museum’s visitors about artifact conservation and lake ecology.
    [Show full text]
  • Field School in Preservation Philosophy and Practice
    Field School in Preservation Philosophy and Practice Friday, October 2, 1– 4 PM Saturday, October 3, 7:30 AM – 5:30 PM Sunday, October 4, 8:30 AM – 2 PM Presented at Codman Estate, 34 Codman Road, Lincoln, Mass., and Lyman Estate, 185 Lyman Street, Waltham, Mass. Historic New England presents a weekend-long Field School in Preservation Philosophy and Practice designed primarily for graduate students in historic preservation and related fields. Learn how Historic New England’s preservation philosophy underpins decision-making on building preservation projects and translates to real world applications. Lectures, case studies, and on-site group field exercises support learning objectives from conditions assessment to project planning, scoping, and treatment. $75 students, $150 Historic New England members, $200 nonmembers. Fee includes four meals, snacks, and beverages. Lodging and transportation are not included. Early registration suggested, registration required. Limited to twenty-two participants with priority registration to students. Must show current student ID at check-in. For more information or to register, please contact Sally Zimmerman at 617-994-6644 or [email protected]. Field School in Preservation Philosophy and Practice Agenda Friday - Codman Estate, Lincoln, Mass. 1:00 – 1:30 - Sign-in - Informal meet and greet 1:30 - 1:45 - Introductions/agenda and goals review 1:45 - 2:30 - Introduction to the Secretary of the Interior’s standards for historic properties 2:45 - 3:30 - Introduction to Historic New England’s preservation philosophy 3:30 – 4:00 - Questions/discussion 4:00 - Optional tours of Codman House 5:00 - Attendees on their own for the evening Saturday - Codman Estate, Lincoln, Mass., and Browne House, Watertown, Mass.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings Volume 20 – 1927–1929 [PDF]
    The Proceedings of the Cambridge Historical Society, Volume 20, 1927-1929 TABLE OF CONTENTS PROCEEDINGS PAGE SEVENTY-SEVENTH MEETING .................................................................. 5 SEVENTY-EIGHTH MEETING ....................................................................... 8 SEVENTY-NINTH MEETING ....................................................................... 9 EIGHTIETH MEETING ............................................................................... 10 EIGHTY-FIRST MEETING ...........................................................................12 EIGHTY-SECOND MEETING ..................................................................... 14 EIGHTY-THIRD MEETING ........................................................................... 15 EIGHTY-FOURTH MEETING ....................................................................... 18 EIGHTY-FIFTH MEETING ............................................................................. 19 EIGHTY-SIXTH MEETING .............................................................................. 21 EIGHTY-SEVENTH MEETING ...................................................................... 22 EIGHTY-EIGHTH MEETING ............................................................................. 23 PAPERS SOME CAMBRIDGE REFORMERS OF THE EIGHTIES...................................... 24 BY PUTNAM CHASE RECOLLECTIONS OF SIXTY YEARS IN CAMBRIDGE........................................ 53 BY EPHRAIM EMERTON THE BATES-DANA HOUSE......................................................................................
    [Show full text]