On the Paragenetic Modes of Minerals
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Karpatite C24H12 C 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, Version 1
Karpatite C24H12 c 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1 Crystal Data: Monoclinic. Point Group: 2/m. Crystals are acicular, thin tabular parallel to [001], showing {001}, {100}, {201}, many other forms, to 1 cm; typically in bladed groups and fibrous radiating aggregates. Physical Properties: Cleavage: On {001}, {100}, {201}, perfect. Fracture: Splintery. Tenacity: Flexible, nearly plastic. Hardness = ∼1 D(meas.) = 1.35–1.40 D(calc.) = 1.29–1.42 Flammable; fluoresces sky-blue under LW and SW UV. Optical Properties: Subtranslucent. Color: Yellow, yellowish brown on exposure. Luster: Vitreous. Optical Class: Biaxial (–) or (+). Orientation: X = b; Z ∧ c =21◦. Dispersion: rv, extreme. α = 1.780(2) β = 1.977–1.982 γ = 2.05–2.15 2V(meas.) = 96◦–115◦ Cell Data: Space Group: P 21/c or P 2/c (synthetic). a = 10.035 b = 4.695 c = 16.014 β = 112◦ Z=2 X-ray Powder Pattern: Olenevo, Ukraine. 9.40 (10), 3.52 (9), 7.52 (8), 3.97 (7), 3.05 (6), 7.25 (5), 3.43 (4) Chemistry: (1) (2) C 96.04 95.97 H 4.04 4.03 O Total 100.08 100.00 (1) Olenevo, Ukraine. (2) C24H12 (coronene). Occurrence: In cavities at the contact of diorite porphyry with argillites (Olenevo, Ukraine); a low-temperature hydrothermal mineral (California, USA). Association: Idrialite, amorphous organic material, calcite, barite, quartz, cinnabar, metacinnabar (Olenevo, Ukraine); cinnabar, quartz (California, USA). Distribution: From near Olenevo, Transcarpathian region, western Ukraine. At Tamvotney, Kamchatka Peninsula, Russia. From the Picacho mercury mine, south of New Idria, San Benito Co., California, USA. -
Mineral Processing
Mineral Processing Foundations of theory and practice of minerallurgy 1st English edition JAN DRZYMALA, C. Eng., Ph.D., D.Sc. Member of the Polish Mineral Processing Society Wroclaw University of Technology 2007 Translation: J. Drzymala, A. Swatek Reviewer: A. Luszczkiewicz Published as supplied by the author ©Copyright by Jan Drzymala, Wroclaw 2007 Computer typesetting: Danuta Szyszka Cover design: Danuta Szyszka Cover photo: Sebastian Bożek Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej Wybrzeze Wyspianskiego 27 50-370 Wroclaw Any part of this publication can be used in any form by any means provided that the usage is acknowledged by the citation: Drzymala, J., Mineral Processing, Foundations of theory and practice of minerallurgy, Oficyna Wydawnicza PWr., 2007, www.ig.pwr.wroc.pl/minproc ISBN 978-83-7493-362-9 Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................9 Part I Introduction to mineral processing .....................................................................13 1. From the Big Bang to mineral processing................................................................14 1.1. The formation of matter ...................................................................................14 1.2. Elementary particles.........................................................................................16 1.3. Molecules .........................................................................................................18 1.4. Solids................................................................................................................19 -
HISTORY and ANALYSIS of the CREATION RESEARCH SOCIETY by William E
AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF William E. Elliott for the degree ofMaster of Science in General Science presented on March 1, 1990. Title: History and Analysis of theCreation ltee Society Redacted for Privacy Abstractapproved: The resurgence of creationismthe past few years has been led by advocates of recent-creationism. These individuals, a minority among creationists in general, argue that the entire universe was created approximately 10,000 years ago in one six- day period of time.Recent-creationists support their position by appealing to the Genesis account of creation and scientific data. Their interpretation of Genesis is based on the doctrines of conservative, evangelical Christianity. Their interpretation of scientific data is informed by their theological presuppositions. The scientific side of recent-creationism is supported by several organizations, most of which had their origin in one group, the Creation Research Society. The CRS is a major factor in the rise of the modern creationist movement. Founded in 1963, this small (c. 2000 mem- bers) group claims to be a bona-fide scientific society engaged in valid scientific re- search conducted from a recent-creationist perspective. These claims are analyzed and evaluated. The Society's history is discussed, including antecedent creationist groups. Most of the group's founders were members of the American Scientific Affiliation, and their rejection of changes within the ASA was a significant motivating factor in founding the CRS. The organization, functioning, and finances of the Society are de- tailed with special emphasis on the group's struggles for independence and credibility. founding the CRS. The organization, functioning, and finances of the Society are de- tailed with special emphasis on the group's struggles for independence and credibility. -
Carbon Mineral Ecology: Predicting the Undiscovered Minerals of Carbon
American Mineralogist, Volume 101, pages 889–906, 2016 Carbon mineral ecology: Predicting the undiscovered minerals of carbon ROBERT M. HAZEN1,*, DANIEL R. HUMMER1, GRETHE HYSTAD2, ROBERT T. DOWNS3, AND JOSHUA J. GOLDEN3 1Geophysical Laboratory, Carnegie Institution, 5251 Broad Branch Road NW, Washington, D.C. 20015, U.S.A. 2Department of Mathematics, Computer Science, and Statistics, Purdue University Calumet, Hammond, Indiana 46323, U.S.A. 3Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, 1040 East 4th Street, Tucson, Arizona 85721-0077, U.S.A. ABSTRACT Studies in mineral ecology exploit mineralogical databases to document diversity-distribution rela- tionships of minerals—relationships that are integral to characterizing “Earth-like” planets. As carbon is the most crucial element to life on Earth, as well as one of the defining constituents of a planet’s near-surface mineralogy, we focus here on the diversity and distribution of carbon-bearing minerals. We applied a Large Number of Rare Events (LNRE) model to the 403 known minerals of carbon, using 82 922 mineral species/locality data tabulated in http://mindat.org (as of 1 January 2015). We find that all carbon-bearing minerals, as well as subsets containing C with O, H, Ca, or Na, conform to LNRE distributions. Our model predicts that at least 548 C minerals exist on Earth today, indicating that at least 145 carbon-bearing mineral species have yet to be discovered. Furthermore, by analyzing subsets of the most common additional elements in carbon-bearing minerals (i.e., 378 C + O species; 282 C + H species; 133 C + Ca species; and 100 C + Na species), we predict that approximately 129 of these missing carbon minerals contain oxygen, 118 contain hydrogen, 52 contain calcium, and more than 60 contain sodium. -
Science Destroys the Evolutionary Paradigm
SCIENCE DESTROYS THE EVOLUTIONARY PARADIGM An Inservice Manual for Young-Earth Creationists Free Images – Snappygoat.com Materialistic Naturalism, an Immoral and Incoherent Philosophy!!! Dr. Jim Pagels – 4/18/2018 1 For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways and my thoughts than your thoughts. For as the rain and the snow come down from heaven and do not return there but water the earth, making it bring forth and sprout, giving seed to the sower and bread to the eater, so shall my word be that goes out from my mouth; it shall not return to me empty, but it shall accomplish that which I purpose, and shall succeed in the thing for which I sent it. Isaiah 55:9-11 This book along with its predecessors including Apologetic Resources, Lesson Plans for Biblical Apologetics and Touching Lives through Apologetics, a Counseling Perspective are offered free for personal and professional use in ministry, being available as downloads on the Michigan District website under schools-curriculum. Scriptural references are typically taken from the English Standard Version (ESV) although the King James Version (KJV) is also periodically utilized. 2 Contents Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………………..…….5 Preface…………………………………………………………………………………………...6 Intended Audience ……………………………………………………………………………....8 Inservice Perspective……….…………………………………………………………….……..9 Inservice Questionnaire……………………………………………………………..…………10 1. Evolution, an Attack on the Supernatural Nature of God…………………………………..21 2. In Search of Truth…………………………………………………………………………..23 3. Creation Apologetics, Simple for Some, Incomprehensible to Others………..……..…….35 4. Two Typical Approaches to Young Earth Creationism……………………………………38 5. The Absolute Veracity of the Supernatural…………………….…………………………..40 6. A Tactical Approach to Creationism………………………….………………………..…..43 7. -
Qalqatar = Goethite, De Fourestier 293 (1999)
Q (quadratic) = tetragonal system, CM 25, 353 (1987). Qalqatar = goethite, de Fourestier 293 (1999). qaquarssukite-(Ce) = qaqarssukite-(Ce), Back & Mandarino 193 (2008). Qaysumah diamond = translucent quartz, Bukanov 392 (2006). qiartz = quartz, Pekov 35 (1998). qinghelite = qingheiite, MM 54, 669 (1990). qitianglinite = qitianlingite, Fleischer 151 (1987). qitianlinite = qitianlingite, Dana 8th, 1809 (1997). QPM = ludjibaite, AM 66, 169 (1981). quadrisilicate d'alumine = Ca-rich marialite, Egleston 106 (1892). Quaertz = quartz, Deer et al. IV, 180 (1963). quandilite = qandilite, MR 22, 239 (1991). quantum-quatro silica = chrysocolla + dioptase + malachite + shattuckite + quartz, de Fourestier 293 (1999). quarfeloids superfamily = quartz + feldspar + felspathoid, MM 20, 464 (1925). quartz-α = quartz, CM 25, 796 (1987). quartz-ß = high-temperature > 573ºC SiO2, Dana 7th III, 251 (1962). quartz-δ = quartz, MA 8, 71 (1941). quartz aérohydre = transparent quartz, Egleston 280 (1892). quartz agate = banded quartz-mogánite mixed-layer, Egleston 281 (1892). quartz agate xyloïde = opal-CT, de Fourestier 293 (1999). quartz agathe arborisé = banded quartz-mogánite mixed-layer, Egleston 281 (1892). quartz agathe cachalong = opal-CT, Egleston 238 (1892). quartz agathe calcédoine = quartz-mogánite mixed-layer, Egleston 282 (1892). quartz agathe calcédoine vert obscure = quartz + hornblende or chlorite, Egleston 283 (1892). quartz agathe calcifère = dolomite, Egleston 108 (1892). quartz agathe chatoyant = asteriated quartz, Egleston 280 (1892). quartz agathe concrétionnée thermogène = opal-CT, Egleston 238 (1892). quartz agathe cornaline = red banded quartz-mogánite mixed-layer, Egleston 282 (1892). quartz agathe dendrètique = banded quartz-mogánite mixed-layer, Egleston 281 (1892). quartz agathe grossière = red massive quartz-mogánite mixed-layer, Egleston 282 (1892). quartz agathe mollaire = quartz-mogánite mixed-layer, Egleston 283 (1892). -
Louis Pasteur's Views on Creation, Evolution, and the Genesis Of
Answers Research Journal 1 (2008): 43–52. www.answersingenesis.org/contents/379/Louis-Pasteur.pdf Louis Pasteur’s Views on Creation, Evolution, and the Genesis of Germs Alan L. Gillen, Professor of Biology, Department of Biology and Chemistry, Liberty University, 1971 University Boulevard, Lynchburg, VA 24502 Frank J. Sherwin III, Science Editor, Institute for Creation Research, 1806 Royal Lane, Dallas, TX 75229 “There is no remembrance of men of old, and even those who are yet to come will not be remembered by those who follow.” Ecclesiastes 1:11 (NIV) Abstract In past years revisionist historians have been rewriting the worldview of Christians who have made some of the major discoveries in biology and medicine. It appears that postmodern revisionists are rewriting history to support their agenda of a more “secular” explanation to science. The Judeo- Christian worldview is not politically correct in most universities. This is true in regard to past scientists such as Louis Pasteur who believed in creation. According to reliable, primary sources such as René Vallery-Radot, Pasteur’s son-in-law, Pasteur’s unique view and application of operational science gave him a significant advantage, benefiting mankind in a number of critical areas. Shortly after Darwin published On the Origin of Species in 1859, Pasteur began to challenge the idea of spontaneous generation—the foundation of the evolutionary view on the origin of life. Pasteur’s simple, but elegant swan-necked flask experiments not only put to rest the organic life-from-non- life idea, but also set the foundation for the law of biogenesis: life only comes from life. -
History of the Terminal Cataclysm Paradigm: Epistemology of a Planetary Bombardment That Never (?) Happened
geosciences Article History of the Terminal Cataclysm Paradigm: Epistemology of a Planetary Bombardment That Never (?) Happened William K. Hartmann Planetary Science Institute, 1700 East Fort Lowell Road, Suite 106, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA; [email protected] Received: 30 November 2018; Accepted: 30 May 2019; Published: 28 June 2019 Abstract: This study examines the history of the paradigm concerning a lunar (or solar-system-wide) terminal cataclysm (also called “Late Heavy Bombardment” or LHB), a putative, brief spike in impacts at ~3.9 Ga ago, preceded by low impact rates. We examine origin of the ideas, why they were accepted, and why the ideas are currently being seriously revised, if not abandoned. The paper is divided into the following sections: 1. Overview of paradigm. 2. Pre-Apollo views (1949–1969). 3. Initial suggestions of cataclysm (ca. 1974). 4. Ironies. 5. Alternative suggestions, megaregolith evolution (1970s). 6. Impact melt rocks “establish” cataclysm (1990). 7. Imbrium redux (ca. 1998). 8. Impact melt clasts (early 2000s). 9. Dating of front-side lunar basins? 10. Dynamical models “explain” the cataclysm (c. 2000s). 11. Asteroids as a test case. 12. Impact melts predating 4.0 Ga ago (ca. 2008–present.). 13. Biological issues. 14. Growing doubts (ca. 1994–2014). 15. Evolving Dynamical Models (ca. 2001–present). 16. Connections to lunar origin. 17. Dismantling the paradigm (2015–2018). 18. “Megaregolith Evolution Model” for explaining the data. 19. Conclusions and new directions for future work. The author hopes that this open-access discussion may prove useful for classroom discussions of how science moves forward through self-correction of hypotheses. -
Biology Principles Review
2016 REVIEW OF BIOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES Develop an understanding of the physical, chemical, and cellular basis of life. Structure and Functions of Organic Molecules (carbohydrates, proteins, lipids, nucleic acids) Structure and Functions of Cells, Cellular Organelles, Cell Specialization, Communication Among Cells Cell as a Living System, Homeostasis, Cellular Transport, Energy Use and Release in Biochemical Reactions Structure and Function of Enzymes, Importance in Biological Systems Bioenergetic Reactions, Aerobic / Anaerobic Respiration, Photosynthesis ORGANIC MOLECULES: CARBOHYDRATE Organic compounds contain carbon and are found in all living things. (Sugar – Glucose) - Carbohydrates major source of energy and include sugars and starches made up of carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen with a 2:1 ratio of hydrogen to oxygen plants and animals use carbohydrates for maintaining structure within the cells - Proteins Nitrogen-containing compounds made up of chains of amino acids 20 amino acids can combine to form a great variety of protein molecules can compose enzymes, hormones, antibodies, and structural components - Lipids PROTEIN water-insoluble (fats and oils) (One Amino Acid) made up of carbon, hydrogen and oxygen; composed of glycerol and fatty acid provide insulation, store energy, cushion internal organs, found in biological membranes saturated (with hydrogen, single bonds, see example ) and unsaturated (double bonds) - Nucleic Acids direct the instruction of proteins genetic information an organism receives from its parents LIPID two -
Spontaneous Generation Vs. Biogenesis SCIENTIFIC Classic Experiments by Redi, Spallinzani, and Pasteur BIO FAX!
Spontaneous Generation vs. Biogenesis SCIENTIFIC Classic Experiments by Redi, Spallinzani, and Pasteur BIO FAX! Introduction Where do living things come from? Do they arise from non-living materials, or can they only come from pre-existing living things? Recreate three classic experiments that helped to disprove the theory of spontaneous generation. Concepts •Biogenesis • Spontaneous generation • Sterilization Materials (for each demonstration or group) Bleach solution (sodium hypochlorite), 10%, 400 mL Marker or wax pencil Chicken, beef or liver, 1⁄3 × 1⁄3 cubed, 2 Plastic tubing, 1⁄8 × 1 Nutrient broth, powder, 2 g Plastic tubing, 1⁄8 × 2 Water, distilled or deionized Plastic tubing, 1⁄8 × 3 Autoclave or pressure cooker Plugs, foam, 21–26 mm, 10 Beaker, 500-mL Stirring rod Cork borer, 1⁄8 Tape Gauze, 1 × 1 Test tube rack Gloves, latex, or other disposable type Test tubes, 25 × 150 mm, 9 Graduated cylinder, 25 mL Tongs Hot plate Safety Precautions Be sure to follow directions carefully when using an autoclave or pressure cooker. Sodium hypochlorite (bleach) causes skin burns and is toxic by ingestion. Wear chemical splash goggles, chemical-resistant gloves, and a chemical-resistant apron. Follow all laboratory safety guidelines and wash hands thoroughly with soap and water before leaving the laboratory. Please review current Material Safety Data Sheets for additional safety, handling, and disposal information. Procedure Part A. Francisco Redi’s 1668 experiment Hypothesis: Living matter always arises from pre-existing living matter. 1. Label two test tubes “A” and “B.” Place a piece of meat in each test tube. 2. Allow test tube “A” to remain open. -
The Biogenesis and Assembly of Photosynthetic Proteins in Thylakoid Membranes1
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1411 (1999) 21^85 Review The biogenesis and assembly of photosynthetic proteins in thylakoid membranes1 Francis-Andre Wollman a;*, Limor Minai b, Rachel Nechushtai b a UPR/CNRS 1261, Institut de Biologie Physico-chimique, 13 rue Pierre et Marie Curie, 75005 Paris, France b Department of Botany, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91904, Israel Received 3 November 1998; received in revised form 27 January 1999; accepted 22 February 1999 Keywords: Chloroplast; Thylakoid membrane; Protein biogenesis; Protein assembly; Protein import; Protein processing Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................... 22 2. Production of the `substrate-subunits' for protein assembly . ....................... 24 2.1. Some distinctive features of photosynthetic prokaryotes and eukaryotes . ........ 24 2.2. Control mechanisms speci¢cally functioning in photosynthetic eukaryotes . ........ 27 3. Conveyance of the PPs to the thylakoid membranes . ............................ 30 3.1. Site of translation of the cyanobacterial and chloroplast-encoded PP subunits ....... 30 3.2. Targeting to the organelle and import . .................................. 32 3.3. Maturation of the precursor: the processing step ............................ 33 3.4. Insertion, assembly and translocation into the thylakoid membranes . ............. 34 4. The biogenesis of PPs: self-assembly or assisted process? . ....................... 35 5. Photosystem II . ..................................................... -
1 Chapter 1.3. Long History of Life on Earth Chapter 1.3 Provides a Brief Overview, Mostly in Chronological Order, of the Evolut
Chapter 1.3. Long History of Life on Earth Chapter 1.3 provides a brief overview, mostly in chronological order, of the evolution of life on Earth. Although new fascinating paleontological discoveries are made continuously and inferences based on properties of modern organisms become more and more reliable, a number of key facts about past evolution have already been firmly established. These facts provide the basis for studying modern life. Section 1.3.1 presents data on the first ~6/7 of the chronology of life, from its origin over 3.500 mya to the end of Proterozoic eon 542 mya. A number of crucial events occurred during these ancient times, including the origins of life itself, the first modern- like prokaryotes, photosynthesis, unicellular eukaryotes, multicellular eukaryotes, and a variety of animals. Early fossil record leaves a lot to be desired, and the available fossils are often hard to interpret so that combining direct and indirect data is particularly important for studying these early times. Section 1.3.2 deals with Phanerozoic eon, from 542 mya to the present. Although all large-scale clades of the Tree of Life were already present at the beginning of this eon, most of the clades of familiar and ecologically important terrestrial living beings evolved later, including land plants, insects, tetrapods, amniotes, mammals, and birds. A rather detailed fossil record of the Phanerozoic eon revealed a number of fascinating transitory forms and many episodes of diversification and extinction. Section 1.3.3 considers extant life from the perspective of its evolutionary history. Phylogenetic relationships of modern organisms, the origin of their spatial distributions, the recent changes in the environment, and the ongoing mass extinction are reviewed.