DOCSLIB.ORG

Life in the Universe

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Northeastern Illinois University Life in the Universe Greg Anderson Department of Physics & Astronomy Northeastern Illinois University Winter-Spring 2020 c 2012-2020 G. Anderson Introduction to Astronomy – slide 1 / 92 Northeastern Illinois Overview University Daing Rocks Life on Earth How Did Life Arise? Life in the Solar System Life Around Other Stars Interstellar Travel SETI Review c 2012-2020 G. Anderson Introduction to Astronomy – slide 2 / 92 Northeastern Illinois University Daing Rocks Zircon Dating Sedimentary Grand Canyon Life on Earth How Did Life Arise? Life in the Solar System Life Around Daing Rocks Other Stars Interstellar Travel SETI Review c 2012-2020 G. Anderson Introduction to Astronomy – slide 3 / 92 Northeastern Illinois Zircon Dating University Zircon, (ZrSiO4), minerals incorporate trace amounts of uranium but reject lead. Naturally occuring uranium: • U-238: 99.27% • U-235: 0.72% Decay chains: • 238U −→ 206Pb, τ =4.47 Gyrs. • 235U −→ 207Pb, τ = 704 Myrs. 1956, Clair Camron Patterson dated the Canyon Diablo meteorite: τ =4.55 Gyrs. c 2012-2020 G. Anderson Introduction to Astronomy – slide 4 / 92 Northeastern Illinois Dating Sedimentary Rocks University • Relative ages: Deeper layers were deposited earlier • Absolute ages: Decay of radioactive isotopes old (deposited last) oldest (depositedolder first) c 2012-2020 G. Anderson Introduction to Astronomy – slide 5 / 92 Grand Canyon: Earth History from 200 million - 2 billion yrs ago. Northeastern Illinois University Daing Rocks Life on Earth Earth History Timeline Late Heavy Bombardment Hadean Greenland Shark Bay Stromatolites Cyanobacteria Life on Earth Q: Earliest Fossils? O2 History Q: Life on Earth How Did Life Arise? Life in the Solar System Life Around Other Stars Interstellar Travel SETI Review c 2012-2020 G. Anderson Introduction to Astronomy – slide 7 / 92 Northeastern Illinois Earth History University Earth Forms (4.6 Ga) Oxygen in Atmosphere Impact Forms Moon (4.5 Ga) Late Heavy Bombardment Isotopic Evidence (3.8 Ga) Stromatolites (3.45 Ga) Hadean Archean Proterozoic Phanerozoic 5 4 3 2 1 0 Billions of years ago c 2012-2020 G. Anderson Introduction to Astronomy – slide 8 / 92 Northeastern Illinois Earth History University Earth Forms (4.6 Ga) Oxygen in Atmosphere Impact Forms Moon (4.5 Ga) Late Heavy Bombardment Isotopic Evidence (3.8 Ga) Stromatolites (3.45 Ga) Hadean Archean Proterozoic Phanerozoic 5 4 3 2 1 0 Billions of years ago Paleozoic Mesozoic Cenozoic c OSD C P TR J K Pg N 550 450 350 250 150 50 Millions of years ago c 2012-2020 G. Anderson Introduction to Astronomy – slide 8 / 92 Northeastern Illinois Timeline for Early Life on Earth University Life arose on Earth soon after the end of late heavy bombardment. • 4.6 billion years ago (Ga) - earth forms • 4.2, 4.4 Ga - evidence of oceans (detrital zircon) • 4.1–3.8 (3.85-3.82) Ga – late heavy bombardment • 3.8 Ga – Isotopic % BIF evidence from Greenland • 3.5, 2.7 Ga – Stromatolites and other fossils. • 2.3 Ga – The great oxygenation event • 2.0 Ga – Evolution of Cells with Nuclei (Eukaryotes) • 1.2 Ga – Evolution of complex multicellular organisms • 0.5 Ga – Cambrian explosion c 2012-2020 G. Anderson Introduction to Astronomy – slide 9 / 92 Hadean Earth c Don Dixon Northeastern Illinois Evidence from Greenland (Controversial) University Greenland is home to some of the oldest rocks on Earth. • Oldest sedimentary rock at Isua 3.82 Ga • Banded iron formations (BIF), t> 3.7Ga at Isua may suggest life. • 13C depleted graphite found in the Isua schists, similar claims for Akilia 150 km to the SW. c 2012-2020 G. Anderson Introduction to Astronomy – slide 12 / 92 Fossil Stromatolites Modern stromatolites: Shark’s Bay Northeastern Illinois Cyanobacteria “blue-green algae” University • The fossil record for early life (Stromatolites) goes back 3.5 Gyrs (disputed) [2.7 Gyrs (undisputed). • Early photosynthesis created a great oxygenation event 2.4 Gyrs ago. • Cyanobacteria obtain their energy through photosynthesis, and pro- duce oxygen as a byproduct. • By releasing oxygen into the atmo- sphere, Cyanobacteria allowed for the evolution of more complex life- forms on Earth. c 2012-2020 G. Anderson Introduction to Astronomy – slide 14 / 92 Northeastern Illinois Q: Earliest Fossils? University According to fossil evidence, how far back in time did life on Earth exist? A) About 65 million years B) About 545 million years C) About 1.0 billion years D) > 2.7–3.5 billion years or more c 2012-2020 G. Anderson Introduction to Astronomy – slide 15 / 92 Northeastern Illinois Q: Earliest Fossils? University According to fossil evidence, how far back in time did life on Earth exist? A) About 65 million years B) About 545 million years C) About 1.0 billion years D) > 2.7–3.5 billion years or more Fossil stromatolites in Australia are 3.5 Ga. c 2012-2020 G. Anderson Introduction to Astronomy – slide 15 / 92 Northeastern Illinois History of Atmospheric Oxygen University • Before 2.3 Ga levels of atmospheric oxygen were to low to sustain aerobic life. • By 0.5–0.6 Ga, atmospheric oxygen was plentiful enough to support complex multicellular life. c 2012-2020 G. Anderson Introduction to Astronomy – slide 16 / 92 Northeastern Illinois Q: Life on Earth University You have a time machine with a dial that you can spin to send you randomly to any time in Earth’s history. If you spin the dial, travel through time, and walk out, what is most likely to happen to you? A) You’ll be eaten by dinosaurs. B) You’ll suffocate because you’ll be unable to breathe the air. C) You’ll be consumed by toxic bacteria. D) Nothing: you’ll probably be just fine. c 2012-2020 G. Anderson Introduction to Astronomy – slide 17 / 92 Northeastern Illinois Q: Life on Earth University You have a time machine with a dial that you can spin to send you randomly to any time in Earth’s history. If you spin the dial, travel through time, and walk out, what is most likely to happen to you? A) You’ll be eaten by dinosaurs. B) You’ll suffocate because you’ll be unable to breathe the air. C) You’ll be consumed by toxic bacteria. D) Nothing: you’ll probably be just fine. c 2012-2020 G. Anderson Introduction to Astronomy – slide 17 / 92 Northeastern Illinois University Daing Rocks Life on Earth How Did Life Arise? Origin of Life on Earth Phylogenetic tree Hydrothermal Vents How did life arise? Miller-Urey How Did Life Arise? Experiment (1953) RNA World Hypothesis pre-cells DNA DNA Strand Evolution Natural Selection Peppered Moth Q: Natural Selection? Life in the Solar System Life Around Other Stars Interstellar Travel c 2012-2020 G. Anderson Introduction to Astronomy – slide 18 / 92 Northeastern Illinois Origin of Life on Earth University Last Universal Common Ancestor (LUCA): • All life on Earth shares a common ancestry. • We may never know exactly how the first organism arose, but laboratory experiments suggest plausible scenarios. Possibilities include: • tidepools • hotsprings • deep sea hydrothermal vents c 2012-2020 G. Anderson Introduction to Astronomy – slide 19 / 92 Northeastern Illinois Hydrothermal Vents University Some lines of evidence, including DNA sequencing, suggest the first life earth may have been an extremophile which lived in extremely high temperatures near deep sea hydrothermal vents. c 2012-2020 G. Anderson Introduction to Astronomy – slide 21 / 92 Northeastern Illinois How did life arise? University 1. Simple organic molecules form 2. Replicating molecules (RNA?) evolve and begin to undergo natural selection. 3. Replicating molecules become enclosed within cell membranes. 4. Some cells evolve modern metabolic processes. 5. Multicellular life evolves c 2012-2020 G. Anderson Introduction to Astronomy – slide 22 / 92 Northeastern Illinois Miller-Urey Experiment (1953) University Stanley Miller & Harold Urey’s U. Chicago experiment to simulate conditions on early Earth: Ingredients for Primor- dial Soup: • Water (H2O) • Methane (CH4) • Ammonia (NH3) • Hydrogen (H2) Shocked, heated cooled, ...produced Amino acids: the building blocks for protiens. Modern versions of this experiment have produced even more builing blocks for life. c 2012-2020 G. Anderson Introduction to Astronomy – slide 23 / 92 Northeastern Illinois RNA World Hypothesis University The first life on earth used RNA to store genetic information and to catalyze chemical reactions. • Discovery of Ribozymes - RNA can catalyze chemical reactions. • Formation of long RNA strands may catalyzed by clays, salty ice water c 2012-2020 G. Anderson Introduction to Astronomy – slide 24 / 92 Northeastern Illinois pre-cells University Clay minerals catalyze formation of membranes around RNA. c 2012-2020 G. Anderson Introduction to Astronomy – slide 25 / 92 Northeastern Illinois Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) University Molecule that encodes the genetic instructions for all living cells. Double helix composed of the nucleotides. Nu- cleotide = nucleobase + deoxyribose sugar + phosphate group. Nucleobases: • Guanine (G): C5H5N5O • Adenine (A): C5H5N5 • Thymine (T): C5H6N2O2 • Cytosine (C): C4H5N3O c 2012-2020 G. Anderson Introduction to Astronomy – slide 26 / 92 Northeastern Illinois Evolution University Evolution: The change in the inherited characteristics of biological populations over successive generations. • All life on earth has decended a common ancestor. • The fossil record shows evolution has occurred through time. • Darwin’s theory of natural selection tells us how this evolution occurs. • This theory was supported by the discovery of DNA: our genetic information is stored in DNA, evolution proceeds through mutations. c 2012-2020 G. Anderson Introduction to Astronomy – slide 28 / 92 Northeastern Illinois Natural Selection University Charles Darwin (1809–1882), The Origin of Species (1859). Natural Selection: • Variations exists within all populations of organisms. • More offspring are produced than can possibly survive. • Individuals with certain traits are more likely to reproduce. • Over time the population evolves. c 2012-2020 G. Anderson Introduction to Astronomy – slide 29 / 92 Northeastern Illinois Evolution of the Peppered Moth University Peppered Moth (Biston betularia): Studied for 200 years.
Recommended publications
  • SETI Is Part of Astrobiology

    SETI Is Part of Astrobiology

    SETI is Part of Astrobiology Jason T. Wright Department of Astronomy & Physics Center for Exoplanets and Habitable Worlds Penn State University Phone: (814) 863-8470 [email protected] I. SETI is Part of Astrobiology “Traditional SETI is not part of astrobiology” declares the NASA Astrobiology Strategy 2015 document (p. 150). This is incorrect.1 Astrobiology is the study of life in the universe, in particular its “origin, evolution, distribution, and future in the universe.” [emphasis mine] Searches for biosignatures are searches for the results of interactions between life and its environment, and could be sensitive to even primitive life on other worlds. As such, these searches focus on the origin and evolution of life, using past life on Earth as a guide. But some of the most obvious ways in which Earth is inhabited today are its technosignatures such as radio transmissions, alterations of its atmosphere by industrial pollutants, and probes throughout the Solar System. It seems clear that the future of life on Earth includes the development of ever more obvious technosignatures. Indeed, the NASA Astrobiology Strategy 2015 document acknowledges “the possibility” that such technosignatures exist, but erroneously declares them to be “not part of contemporary SETI,” and mentions them only to declare that we should “be aware of the possibility” and to “be sure to include [technosignatures] as a possible kind of interpretation we should consider as we begin to get data on the exoplanets.” In other words, while speculation on the nature of biosignatures and the design of multi-billion dollar missions to find those signatures is consistent with NASA’s vision for astrobiology, speculation on the nature of technosignatures and the design of observations to find them is not.
  • Lecture-29 (PDF)

    Lecture-29 (PDF)

    Life in the Universe Orin Harris and Greg Anderson Department of Physics & Astronomy Northeastern Illinois University Spring 2021 c 2012-2021 G. Anderson., O. Harris Universe: Past, Present & Future – slide 1 / 95 Overview Dating Rocks Life on Earth How Did Life Arise? Life in the Solar System Life Around Other Stars Interstellar Travel SETI Review c 2012-2021 G. Anderson., O. Harris Universe: Past, Present & Future – slide 2 / 95 Dating Rocks Zircon Dating Sedimentary Grand Canyon Life on Earth How Did Life Arise? Life in the Solar System Life Around Dating Rocks Other Stars Interstellar Travel SETI Review c 2012-2021 G. Anderson., O. Harris Universe: Past, Present & Future – slide 3 / 95 Zircon Dating Zircon, (ZrSiO4), minerals incorporate trace amounts of uranium but reject lead. Naturally occuring uranium: • U-238: 99.27% • U-235: 0.72% Decay chains: • 238U −→ 206Pb, τ =4.47 Gyrs. • 235U −→ 207Pb, τ = 704 Myrs. 1956, Clair Camron Patterson dated the Canyon Diablo meteorite: τ =4.55 Gyrs. c 2012-2021 G. Anderson., O. Harris Universe: Past, Present & Future – slide 4 / 95 Dating Sedimentary Rocks • Relative ages: Deeper layers were deposited earlier • Absolute ages: Decay of radioactive isotopes old (deposited last) oldest (depositedolder first) c 2012-2021 G. Anderson., O. Harris Universe: Past, Present & Future – slide 5 / 95 Grand Canyon: Earth History from 200 million - 2 billion yrs ago. Dating Rocks Life on Earth Earth History Timeline Late Heavy Bombardment Hadean Shark Bay Stromatolites Cyanobacteria Q: Earliest Fossils? Life on Earth O2 History Q: Life on Earth How Did Life Arise? Life in the Solar System Life Around Other Stars Interstellar Travel SETI Review c 2012-2021 G.
  • Materials Challenges for the Starshot Lightsail

    Materials Challenges for the Starshot Lightsail

    PERSPECTIVE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-018-0075-8 Materials challenges for the Starshot lightsail Harry A. Atwater 1*, Artur R. Davoyan1, Ognjen Ilic1, Deep Jariwala1, Michelle C. Sherrott 1, Cora M. Went2, William S. Whitney2 and Joeson Wong 1 The Starshot Breakthrough Initiative established in 2016 sets an audacious goal of sending a spacecraft beyond our Solar System to a neighbouring star within the next half-century. Its vision for an ultralight spacecraft that can be accelerated by laser radiation pressure from an Earth-based source to ~20% of the speed of light demands the use of materials with extreme properties. Here we examine stringent criteria for the lightsail design and discuss fundamental materials challenges. We pre- dict that major research advances in photonic design and materials science will enable us to define the pathways needed to realize laser-driven lightsails. he Starshot Breakthrough Initiative has challenged a broad nanocraft, we reveal a balance between the high reflectivity of the and interdisciplinary community of scientists and engineers sail, required for efficient photon momentum transfer; large band- Tto design an ultralight spacecraft or ‘nanocraft’ that can reach width, accounting for the Doppler shift; and the low mass necessary Proxima Centauri b — an exoplanet within the habitable zone of for the spacecraft to accelerate to near-relativistic speeds. We show Proxima Centauri and 4.2 light years away from Earth — in approxi- that nanophotonic structures may be well-suited to meeting such mately
  • Breakthrough Propulsion Study Assessing Interstellar Flight Challenges and Prospects

    Breakthrough Propulsion Study Assessing Interstellar Flight Challenges and Prospects

    Breakthrough Propulsion Study Assessing Interstellar Flight Challenges and Prospects NASA Grant No. NNX17AE81G First Year Report Prepared by: Marc G. Millis, Jeff Greason, Rhonda Stevenson Tau Zero Foundation Business Office: 1053 East Third Avenue Broomfield, CO 80020 Prepared for: NASA Headquarters, Space Technology Mission Directorate (STMD) and NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts (NIAC) Washington, DC 20546 June 2018 Millis 2018 Grant NNX17AE81G_for_CR.docx pg 1 of 69 ABSTRACT Progress toward developing an evaluation process for interstellar propulsion and power options is described. The goal is to contrast the challenges, mission choices, and emerging prospects for propulsion and power, to identify which prospects might be more advantageous and under what circumstances, and to identify which technology details might have greater impacts. Unlike prior studies, the infrastructure expenses and prospects for breakthrough advances are included. This first year's focus is on determining the key questions to enable the analysis. Accordingly, a work breakdown structure to organize the information and associated list of variables is offered. A flow diagram of the basic analysis is presented, as well as more detailed methods to convert the performance measures of disparate propulsion methods into common measures of energy, mass, time, and power. Other methods for equitable comparisons include evaluating the prospects under the same assumptions of payload, mission trajectory, and available energy. Missions are divided into three eras of readiness (precursors, era of infrastructure, and era of breakthroughs) as a first step before proceeding to include comparisons of technology advancement rates. Final evaluation "figures of merit" are offered. Preliminary lists of mission architectures and propulsion prospects are provided.
  • Optical SETI: the All-Sky Survey

    Optical SETI: the All-Sky Survey

    Professor van der Veen Project Scientist, UCSB Department of Physics, Experimental Cosmology Group class 4 [email protected] frequencies/wavelengths that get through the atmosphere The Planetary Society http://www.planetary.org/blogs/jason-davis/2017/20171025-seti-anybody-out-there.html THE ATMOSPHERE'S EFFECT ON ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION Earth's atmosphere prevents large chunks of the electromagnetic spectrum from reaching the ground, providing a natural limit on where ground-based observatories can search for SETI signals. Searching for technology that we have, or are close to having: Continuous radio searches Pulsed radio searches Targeted radio searches All-sky surveys Optical: Continuous laser and near IR searches Pulsed laser searches a hypothetical laser beacon watch now: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=41&v=zuvyhxORhkI Theoretical physicist Freeman Dyson’s “First Law of SETI Investigations:” Every search for alien civilizations should be planned to give interesting results even when no aliens are discovered. Interview with Carl Sagan from 1978: Start at 6:16 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g- Q8aZoWqF0&feature=youtu.be Anomalous signal recorded by Big Ear Telescope at Ohio State University. Big Ear was a flat, aluminum dish three football fields wide, with reflectors at both ends. Signal was at 1,420 MHz, the hydrogen 21 cm ‘spin flip’ line. http://www.bigear.org/Wow30th/wow30th.htm May 15, 2015 A Russian observatory reports a strong signal from a Sun-like star. Possibly from advanced alien civilization. The RATAN-600 radio telescope in Zelenchukskaya, at the northern foot of the Caucasus Mountains location: star HD 164595 G-type star (like our Sun) 94.35 ly away, visually located in constellation Hercules 1 planet that orbits it every 40 days unusual radio signal detected – 11 GHz (2.7 cm) claim: Signal from a Type II Kardashev civilization Only one observation Not confirmed by other telescopes Russian Academy of Sciences later retracted the claim that it was an ETI signal, stating the signal came from a military satellite.
  • Lecture 9—Is the Earth Rare?

    Lecture 9—Is the Earth Rare?

    41st Saas-Fee Course From Planets to Life 3-9 April 2011 Lecture 9—Is the Earth Rare? List of Rare Earth arguments/ Nitrogen abundance/ Frequency of large impacts/ Chaotic obliquity fluctuations J. F. Kasting The Gaia hypothesis First presented in the 1970s by James Lovelock 1979 1988 • Life itself is what stabilizes planetary environments • Corollary: A planet might need to be inhabited in order to remain habitable The Medea and Rare Earth hypotheses Peter Ward 2009 2000 Medea hypothesis: Life is harmful to the Earth! Rare Earth hypothesis: Complex life (animals, including humans) is rare in the universe Additional support for the Rare Earth hypothesis • Lenton and Watson think that complex life (animal life) is rare because it requires a series of unlikely evolutionary events – the origin of life – the origin of the genetic code – the development of oxygenic photosynthesis) – the origin of eukaryotes – the origin of sexuality 2011 Rare Earth/Gaia arguments 1. Plate tectonics is rare --We have dealt with this already. Plate tectonics is not necessarily rare, but it requires liquid water. Thus, a planet needs to be within the habitable zone. 2. Other planets may lack magnetic fields and may therefore have harmful radiation environments and be subject to loss of atmosphere – We have talked about this one also. Venus has retained its atmosphere. The atmosphere itself provides protection against cosmic rays 3. The animal habitable zone (AHZ) is smaller than the habitable zone (HZ) o – AHZ definition: Ts = 0-50 C o – HZ definition: Ts = 0-100 C. But this is wrong! For a 1-bar atmosphere like Earth, o water loss begins when Ts reaches 60 C.
  • A Direct Communication Proposal to Test the Zoo Hypothesis

    A Direct Communication Proposal to Test the Zoo Hypothesis

    Space Policy 38 (2016) 22e26 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Space Policy journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/spacepol Viewpoint A direct communication proposal to test the Zoo Hypothesis Joao~ Pedro de Magalhaes~ Institute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Biosciences Building, Room 245, Crown Street, Liverpool, L69 7ZB, UK article info abstract Article history: Whether we are alone in the universe is one of the greatest mysteries facing humankind. Given the >100 Received 3 March 2016 billion stars in our galaxy, many have argued that it is statistically unlikely that life, including intelligent Accepted 16 June 2016 life, has not emerged anywhere else. The lack of any sign of extraterrestrial intelligence, even though on a Available online 26 July 2016 cosmic timescale extraterrestrial civilizations would have enough time to cross the galaxy, is known as Fermi's Paradox. One possible explanation for Fermi's Paradox is the Zoo Hypothesis which states that Keywords: one or more extraterrestrial civilizations know of our existence and can reach us, but have chosen not to Active SETI disturb us or even make their existence known to us. I propose here a proactive test of the Zoo Hy- Astrobiology fi Fermi's Paradox pothesis. Speci cally, I propose to send a message using television and radio channels to any extrater- Messaging to extraterrestrial intelligence restrial civilization(s) that might be listening and inviting them to respond. Even though I accept this is METI unlikely to be successful in the sense of resulting in a response from extraterrestrial intelligences, the possibility that extraterrestrial civilizations are monitoring us cannot be dismissed and my proposal is consistent with current scientific knowledge.
  • Livre-Ovni.Pdf

    Livre-Ovni.Pdf

    UN MONDE BIZARRE Le livre des étranges Objets Volants Non Identifiés Chapitre 1 Paranormal Le paranormal est un terme utilisé pour qualifier un en- mé n'est pas considéré comme paranormal par les semble de phénomènes dont les causes ou mécanismes neuroscientifiques) ; ne sont apparemment pas explicables par des lois scien- tifiques établies. Le préfixe « para » désignant quelque • Les différents moyens de communication avec les chose qui est à côté de la norme, la norme étant ici le morts : naturels (médiumnité, nécromancie) ou ar- consensus scientifique d'une époque. Un phénomène est tificiels (la transcommunication instrumentale telle qualifié de paranormal lorsqu'il ne semble pas pouvoir que les voix électroniques); être expliqué par les lois naturelles connues, laissant ain- si le champ libre à de nouvelles recherches empiriques, à • Les apparitions de l'au-delà (fantômes, revenants, des interprétations, à des suppositions et à l'imaginaire. ectoplasmes, poltergeists, etc.) ; Les initiateurs de la parapsychologie se sont donné comme objectif d'étudier d'une manière scientifique • la cryptozoologie (qui étudie l'existence d'espèce in- ce qu'ils considèrent comme des perceptions extra- connues) : classification assez injuste, car l'objet de sensorielles et de la psychokinèse. Malgré l'existence de la cryptozoologie est moins de cultiver les mythes laboratoires de parapsychologie dans certaines universi- que de chercher s’il y a ou non une espèce animale tés, notamment en Grande-Bretagne, le paranormal est inconnue réelle derrière une légende ; généralement considéré comme un sujet d'étude peu sé- rieux. Il est en revanche parfois associé a des activités • Le phénomène ovni et ses dérivés (cercle de culture).
  • University of Groningen Evaluating Galactic Habitability Using High

    University of Groningen Evaluating Galactic Habitability Using High

    University of Groningen Evaluating galactic habitability using high-resolution cosmological simulations of galaxy formation Forgan, Duncan; Dayal, Pratika; Cockell, Charles; Libeskind, Noam Published in: International Journal of Astrobiology DOI: 10.1017/S1473550415000518 IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Final author's version (accepted by publisher, after peer review) Publication date: 2017 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Forgan, D., Dayal, P., Cockell, C., & Libeskind, N. (2017). Evaluating galactic habitability using high- resolution cosmological simulations of galaxy formation. International Journal of Astrobiology, 16(1), 60–73. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1473550415000518 Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license. More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne- amendment. Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal.
  • Monday, November 13, 2017 WHAT DOES IT MEAN to BE HABITABLE? 8:15 A.M. MHRGC Salons ABCD 8:15 A.M. Jang-Condell H. * Welcome C

    Monday, November 13, 2017 WHAT DOES IT MEAN to BE HABITABLE? 8:15 A.M. MHRGC Salons ABCD 8:15 A.M. Jang-Condell H. * Welcome C

    Monday, November 13, 2017 WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO BE HABITABLE? 8:15 a.m. MHRGC Salons ABCD 8:15 a.m. Jang-Condell H. * Welcome Chair: Stephen Kane 8:30 a.m. Forget F. * Turbet M. Selsis F. Leconte J. Definition and Characterization of the Habitable Zone [#4057] We review the concept of habitable zone (HZ), why it is useful, and how to characterize it. The HZ could be nicknamed the “Hunting Zone” because its primary objective is now to help astronomers plan observations. This has interesting consequences. 9:00 a.m. Rushby A. J. Johnson M. Mills B. J. W. Watson A. J. Claire M. W. Long Term Planetary Habitability and the Carbonate-Silicate Cycle [#4026] We develop a coupled carbonate-silicate and stellar evolution model to investigate the effect of planet size on the operation of the long-term carbon cycle, and determine that larger planets are generally warmer for a given incident flux. 9:20 a.m. Dong C. F. * Huang Z. G. Jin M. Lingam M. Ma Y. J. Toth G. van der Holst B. Airapetian V. Cohen O. Gombosi T. Are “Habitable” Exoplanets Really Habitable? A Perspective from Atmospheric Loss [#4021] We will discuss the impact of exoplanetary space weather on the climate and habitability, which offers fresh insights concerning the habitability of exoplanets, especially those orbiting M-dwarfs, such as Proxima b and the TRAPPIST-1 system. 9:40 a.m. Fisher T. M. * Walker S. I. Desch S. J. Hartnett H. E. Glaser S. Limitations of Primary Productivity on “Aqua Planets:” Implications for Detectability [#4109] While ocean-covered planets have been considered a strong candidate for the search for life, the lack of surface weathering may lead to phosphorus scarcity and low primary productivity, making aqua planet biospheres difficult to detect.
  • Predicted Performance of an X-Ray Navigation System for Future Deep Space and Lunar Missions Joel Getchius#, Anne Long‡, Mitra Farahmand‡, Luke B

    Predicted Performance of an X-Ray Navigation System for Future Deep Space and Lunar Missions Joel Getchius#, Anne Long‡, Mitra Farahmand‡, Luke B

    Predicted Performance of an X-ray Navigation System For Future Deep Space and Lunar Missions Joel Getchius#, Anne Long‡, Mitra Farahmand‡, Luke B. Winternitz†, Munther A. Hassouneh†, Jason W. Mitchell† † NASA Goddard Space Flight Center ‡a.i. solutions, Inc. #Omitron, Inc. American Astronautical Society 42nd Annual Guidance and Control Conference Beaver Run Resort, Breckenridge, CO February 4, 2019 X-ray Pulsar Navigation (XNAV) • Millisecond pulsars (MSPs): rapidly rotating neutron stars that pulsate across electromagnetic spectrum • Some MSPs rival atomic clock stability at long time-scales – Predict pulse arrival phase with great accuracy at any reference point in the Solar System via pulsar timing model on a spacecraft – Compare observed phase to prediction for navigation information • Why X-rays? – Many stable MSPs conveniently detectable in (soft) X-ray band – X-rays immune to interstellar dispersion thought to limit radio pulsar timing models – Highly directional compact detectors possible • Main Challenge: MSPs are very faint! Crab Pulsar (1/3 speed), Cambridge University, Lucky Image Group 2 X-ray Pulsar Navigation (XNAV) Applications • XNAV can provide autonomous navigation and timing that is of uniform quality throughout the solar system – Is enabling technology for very deep space missions – Provides backup autonomous navigation for crewed missions – Augments Deep Space Network (DSN) or op-nav techniques Pioneer plaque (Pioneer 10,11 1972-73) – Allows autonomous navigation while occulted, e.g., with pulsar periods and relative behind Sun distances to our Sun History • Pulsars were discovered in 1967 and immediately recognized as a potential tool for Galactic navigation • US Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) (1999-2000) – Unconventional Stellar Aspect (USA) Experiment • DARPA XNAV, XTIM Projects (2005-2006, 2009-2012) • Significant body of research (international interest, academic research, several Ph.D.
  • HISTORY and ANALYSIS of the CREATION RESEARCH SOCIETY by William E

    HISTORY and ANALYSIS of the CREATION RESEARCH SOCIETY by William E

    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF William E. Elliott for the degree ofMaster of Science in General Science presented on March 1, 1990. Title: History and Analysis of theCreation ltee Society Redacted for Privacy Abstractapproved: The resurgence of creationismthe past few years has been led by advocates of recent-creationism. These individuals, a minority among creationists in general, argue that the entire universe was created approximately 10,000 years ago in one six- day period of time.Recent-creationists support their position by appealing to the Genesis account of creation and scientific data. Their interpretation of Genesis is based on the doctrines of conservative, evangelical Christianity. Their interpretation of scientific data is informed by their theological presuppositions. The scientific side of recent-creationism is supported by several organizations, most of which had their origin in one group, the Creation Research Society. The CRS is a major factor in the rise of the modern creationist movement. Founded in 1963, this small (c. 2000 mem- bers) group claims to be a bona-fide scientific society engaged in valid scientific re- search conducted from a recent-creationist perspective. These claims are analyzed and evaluated. The Society's history is discussed, including antecedent creationist groups. Most of the group's founders were members of the American Scientific Affiliation, and their rejection of changes within the ASA was a significant motivating factor in founding the CRS. The organization, functioning, and finances of the Society are de- tailed with special emphasis on the group's struggles for independence and credibility. founding the CRS. The organization, functioning, and finances of the Society are de- tailed with special emphasis on the group's struggles for independence and credibility.