The Continuity of Madhyamaka and Yogacara in Indian

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Continuity of Madhyamaka and Yogacara in Indian THE CONTINUITY OF MADHYAMAKA AND YOGACARA IN INDIAN MAHAYANA BUDDHISM by IAN CHARLES HARRIS Submitted for the degree of PhD DEPARTMENT OF RELIGIOUS STUDIES THE UNIVERSITY OF LANCSTER JUNE 1985 ProQuest Number: 11003643 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 11003643 Published by ProQuest LLC(2018). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 DESTRUAM ET AEDIFICABO - Proudhon ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS To my wife Gwen, without whose support this would not have been possible, and to my supervisor, Andrew Rawlinson,for his helpful comments, criticisms and comradeship. Authors Ian Charles Harris Titles The Continuity of Madhyamaka and Yogaoara in Indian Mahay ana Buddhism* Degrees PhD Dates June 1935* ABSTRACT In the history of Buddhist scholarship it has been the convention to treat the Madhyamaka and Yogacarip strands of the Mahayana as . separate and fundamentally opposed schools of thought. This thesis represents an attempt to explore the relationship between the two in some detail and comes to the conclusion that earlier assessments are not justified by either textual evidence, or by underlying trends in the history of the development of Buddhist thought as such. The overall substance of the thesis is a general reappraisal of the ontological and epistemological doctrines contained in the writings of Nagirjuna, Asanga and Vasubandhu with particular reference to the earliest Buddhist philosophical texts available. By turning to the texts themselves, and assigning a lesser significance to the commentarial literature of a later period, it is possible to show considerable overlap in all areas of doctrine, but particularly the treatment of the levels of truth, the understanding of the enlight­ ened and the unenlightened states and their relation to an indeterminate existence realm, the nature of that real^1, and finally the function and status of language and thought. As a result of these investigations it is possible to erect a new theory to explain the proliferation of Indian Mahayana Buddhism which does not operate on a schismatic basis, but rather accounts for variety as the consequence of individual authors addressing new audiences, and specific contemporary problems, from a firm and consistent doctrinal bedrock. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iii ABSTRACT iv INTRODUCTION vi / CHAPTER I : A PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION 1 OF MADHYAMAKA ONTOLOGY CHAPTER II : NAGARJUNA AND LOGIC 31 y/ CHAPTER III : NAGARJUNA AND THE CONTINUITY 65 OF TRADITION CHAPTER IV : THE PROBLEM OF MAHAYANA •"SCHOOLS" 96 yj CHAPTER V : THE CONCEPTION OF TRUTH IN THE 125 HINAYANA x/ CHAPTER VI : THE TWO TRUTHS AND THE THREE NATURES 155 CHAPTER VII : THE NATURE OF REALITY 198 v/ CHAPTER VIII : THE PROBLEM OF IDEALISM 233 yf CONCLUSION 263 BIBLIOGRAPHY 267 ABBREVIATIONS 274 v INTRODUCTION VERITAS SEQUITUR ESSE RERUM - AQUINAS In the first chapter the intention will be to demonstrate that Nagarjuna accepts the distinction between the enlightened and the unenlightened state. These states may be understood implicitly in terms of states of mind. The former will then be represented A — w . — _ by jnana/prajna, while the latter corresponds to vijnana. The tA _ essential difference between the two is that vijnana is contaminated by a variety of mental concomitants such as prapanca and vikalpa; _ _ vt _ jnana is not. Conditioned by avidya, vijnana is unable to reproduce a true picture of things. The world appears to be constructed of substantial entities. Jnana results in the destruction of this erroneous world view. Through jnana things are understood not as independent, but as interdependent (pratityasamutpanna). However, and this is a discussion which is examined in more detail in Chapter 5, since language is itself a form of expression entirely implicated in the distorted world view, it follows that the truth about reality must be inexpressible. Chapter 2 examines the logical stance taken by Nagarjuna. This clearly shows that he does not adhere to the prasahga method often associated with him. His method is based on certain axioms common to Buddhist tradition as a whole, and one would be wrong, in consequence, in assigning him the status of seminal thinker. It is the view of this thesis that Nagarjuna both adheres to the doctrine of the vi inexpressibility of truth, and maintains the existence of an onto­ logical truth realm, ie.he is not a nihilist. Truth is revealed beyond the borders of language. In a sense then it would be correct to say that for Nagarjuna the true nature of things lies midway between the dichotomies of language - between existence and non­ existence. The structure of language cannot exhaust the way things truly are. This being so one cannot deny the existence of reality nihilistically, and in consequence, one will be forced to admit an ontologically indeterminate realm, a realm which cannot be determined in terms of existence or non-existence. The doctrine of sunyata is intimately tied to this. The true nature of things is dependently originated (pratityasamutpada). This state is falsely cognised in the unenlightened state. Bodhi therefore rep­ resents the enlightened mind purged of avidya, etc. Bodhi then is sunyati in the sense that it is empty of the defilements of ignorance. Sunyata is not an ontological state, but rather a state of mind in which there is a true identification of cogniser and cognised - a state incapable of articulation. In Chapter 3 we analyse Nagirjuna’s connection with early Buddhism and find a general continuity of thought. We go on to contrast the nirvapa/samsara dichotomy with what we have already discussed. As a result nirvana can be clearly associated with bodhi - that state of mind in which the dichotomies generated by prapanca have been eradicated, while samsara becomes identified with the world A — —- picture composed through the agency of vijnana. Both nirvana and samsara then do not represent ontological states. On the contrary, they are shown to be orientations to one ontological, vii though unpredic-able realm, which is itself the base for the arising of both vijnana and jnana/prajna. With chapter 4 we turn our attention to the Yogacira. We question the view of the older generation of scholars who wished to establish radical differences between this school and the position of Nigarjuna. We show that many of these attempts are based both on an interpretation of Nagarjuna’s teaching passed down through Candrakirti, and on certain presuppositions inherited from the history of Western thought. Candrakirti’s understanding of Yogacara was that it was preliminary to the study of Madhyamaka. We are able to show that this is simply not so. Candrakirti misunderstands the basis of the Yogacara teachings and attributes positions to them which they do not hold. In fact the axioms of the Madhyamaka and Yogacara are common. The idea of an initiatory scheme of Buddhist teaching, with the Madhyamaka at the top is exposed as a very late development in the history of Indian Mahayana Buddhism. The important doctrine of the levels of truth as it crops up throughout the history of Buddhist thought is explored in Chapters 5 and 6. We discover a bewildering assortment of differing formulations which can however be simplified quite consistently. Two strands can be identified in the early material. Both are underpinned by a theory of language, though these theories are divergent. In the first two separate areas of discourse may be identified; implicit (nitattha) language about things, and that which is termed explicit (neyattha). The former is in accordance with conventional usage, while the latter reflects the Buddhist understanding of things. The latter is therefore viii accurate and supplies a true picture of the world. This particular teaching is the forerunner of the dharma theory of the Abhidharma which seems to be refuted in the writings of the Mahayana. In the Abhidharma language which takes into account the dharmic constitution of things is said to be ultimately true (paramattha), while that which does not is only conventionally so (sammuti). The theory of truths which is developed in the Mahayana can also be found in the early tradition. This theory is entirely consistent with the understanding of language discussed in Chapters 1 and 2 and accepted by both the Madhyamaka and the Yogacara. According to this particular strand of thinking, whatever is expressed is *\ — essentially contaminated by vijnana and its mental concomitants, and as such constitutes a false picture of things. Ultimately truth, and hence the teaching of the Buddha, is equated with silence. It may not be attained through the processes of thought, but rather through their elimination. The problem with this particular formulation is that by accepting it one must automatically hold to the corrolary; that everything which is expressed is false. The doctrine of three v \ _ _ _ natures (trisvabhava) expounded in the Prajnaparamita and by the Yogacara is an attempt to show that the two truth doctrine should not be taken in such a manner. There are no essential differences between the two and three nature formulations - the latter simply makes explicit what was implicit in the former. This takes us back to our distinction between an ontologically indeterminate realm and the two orientations towards it. In the Madhyamaka it is quite clear that the ultimate (paramartha) and the conventional ix (saipvrti) truths refer to the perspectives associated with jnana and vijnana respectively.
Recommended publications
  • Thinking in Buddhism: Nagarjuna's Middle
    Thinking in Buddhism: Nagarjuna’s Middle Way 1994 Jonah Winters About this Book Any research into a school of thought whose texts are in a foreign language encounters certain difficulties in deciding which words to translate and which ones to leave in the original. It is all the more of an issue when the texts in question are from a language ancient and quite unlike our own. Most of the texts on which this thesis are based were written in two languages: the earliest texts of Buddhism were written in a simplified form of Sanskrit called Pali, and most Indian texts of Madhyamika were written in either classical or “hybrid” Sanskrit. Terms in these two languages are often different but recognizable, e.g. “dhamma” in Pali and “dharma” in Sanskrit. For the sake of coherency, all such terms are given in their Sanskrit form, even when that may entail changing a term when presenting a quote from Pali. Since this thesis is not intended to be a specialized research document for a select audience, terms have been translated whenever possible,even when the subtletiesof the Sanskrit term are lost in translation.In a research paper as limited as this, those subtleties are often almost irrelevant.For example, it is sufficient to translate “dharma” as either “Law” or “elements” without delving into its multiplicity of meanings in Sanskrit. Only four terms have been left consistently untranslated. “Karma” and “nirvana” are now to be found in any English dictionary, and so their translation or italicization is unnecessary. Similarly, “Buddha,” while literally a Sanskrit term meaning “awakened,” is left untranslated and unitalicized due to its titular nature and its familiarity.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes and Topics: Synopsis of Taranatha's History
    SYNOPSIS OF TARANATHA'S HISTORY Synopsis of chapters I - XIII was published in Vol. V, NO.3. Diacritical marks are not used; a standard transcription is followed. MRT CHAPTER XIV Events of the time of Brahmana Rahula King Chandrapala was the ruler of Aparantaka. He gave offerings to the Chaityas and the Sangha. A friend of the king, Indradhruva wrote the Aindra-vyakarana. During the reign of Chandrapala, Acharya Brahmana Rahulabhadra came to Nalanda. He took ordination from Venerable Krishna and stu­ died the Sravakapitaka. Some state that he was ordained by Rahula­ prabha and that Krishna was his teacher. He learnt the Sutras and the Tantras of Mahayana and preached the Madhyamika doctrines. There were at that time eight Madhyamika teachers, viz., Bhadantas Rahula­ garbha, Ghanasa and others. The Tantras were divided into three sections, Kriya (rites and rituals), Charya (practices) and Yoga (medi­ tation). The Tantric texts were Guhyasamaja, Buddhasamayayoga and Mayajala. Bhadanta Srilabha of Kashmir was a Hinayaist and propagated the Sautrantika doctrines. At this time appeared in Saketa Bhikshu Maha­ virya and in Varanasi Vaibhashika Mahabhadanta Buddhadeva. There were four other Bhandanta Dharmatrata, Ghoshaka, Vasumitra and Bu­ dhadeva. This Dharmatrata should not be confused with the author of Udanavarga, Dharmatrata; similarly this Vasumitra with two other Vasumitras, one being thr author of the Sastra-prakarana and the other of the Samayabhedoparachanachakra. [Translated into English by J. Masuda in Asia Major 1] In the eastern countries Odivisa and Bengal appeared Mantrayana along with many Vidyadharas. One of them was Sri Saraha or Mahabrahmana Rahula Brahmachari. At that time were composed the Mahayana Sutras except the Satasahasrika Prajnaparamita.
    [Show full text]
  • Self and Non-Self in Early Buddhism (Joaquin Pérez-Remón)
    THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BUDDHIST STUDIES EDITOR-IN-CHIEF A.K. Narain University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA EDITORS L.M.Joshi Ernst Steinkellner Punjabi University University of Vienna PatiaUi, India Wien, Austria Alexander W. Macdonald Jikido Takasaki Universitede Paris X University of Tokyo Nanterre, France Tokyo,Japan Hardwell Smith Robert Thurman Carleton College Amherst College Northjield, Minnesota, USA Amherst, Massachusetts, USA ASSISTANT EDITOR Roger Jackson University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA Volume 8 1985 Number I CONTENTS I. ARTICLES J. Nagarjuna's Arguments Against Motion, by Kamaleswar Bhattacharya 7 2. Dharani and Pratibhdna: Memory and Eloquence of the Bodhisattvas, by J ens Braarvig 17 3. The Concept of a "Creator God" in Tantric Buddhism, by Eva K. Dargyay 31 4. Direct Perception (Pratyakja) in dGe-iugs-pa Interpre­ tations of Sautrantika,^/lnw^C. Klein 49 5. A Text-Historical Note on Hevajratantra II: v: 1-2, by lj>onard W.J. van der Kuijp 83 6. Simultaneous Relation (Sahabhu-hetu): A Study in Bud­ dhist Theory of Causation, by Kenneth K. Tanaka 91 II. BOOK REVIEWS AND NOTICES Reviews: 1. The Books o/Kiu- Te or the Tibetan Buddhist Tantras: A Pre­ liminary Analysis, by David Reigle Dzog Chen and Zen, by Namkhai Norbu (Roger Jackson) 113 2. Nagarjuniana. Studies in the Writings and Philosophy of Ndgdrjuna, by Chr. Lindtner (Fernando Tola and Carmen Dragonetti) 115 3. Selfless Persons: Imagery and Thought in Theravada Bud­ dhism, by Steven Collins (Vijitha Rajapakse) 117 4. Self and Non-Self in Early Buddhism, by Joaquin Perez- Remon (VijithaRajapkse) 122 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Anattā and Nibbāna: Egolessness and Deliverance
    Anattā and Nibbāna Egolessness and Deliverance by Nyanaponika Thera Buddhist Publication Society Kandy • Sri Lanka The Wheel Publication No. 11 First published: 1959 Reprinted: 1971, 1986 A slightly differing German version of this essay appeared in 1951 in the magazine Die Einsicht. The English version was first published in the quarterly The Light of the Dhamma, Vol. IV, No. 3 (Rangoon 1957) under the title “Nibbāna in the Light of the Middle Doctrine.” BPS Online Edition © (2008) Digital Transcription Source: BPS Transcription Project For free distribution. This work may be republished, reformatted, reprinted and redistributed in any medium. However, any such republication and redistribution is to be made available to the public on a free and unrestricted basis and translations and other derivative works are to be clearly marked as such. Contents Introduction 2 I. The Nihilistic-Negative Extreme 5 II The Positive-Metaphysical Extreme 9 III Transcending the Extremes 14 Introduction This world, Kaccāna, usually leans upon a duality: upon (the belief in) existence or non- existence.… Avoiding these two extremes, the Perfect One shows the doctrine in the middle: Dependent on ignorance are the kamma-formations.… By the cessation of ignorance, kamma-formations cease.… (SN 12:15) The above saying of the Buddha speaks of the duality of existence (atthitā) and non-existence (natthitā). These two terms refer to the theories of eternalism (sassata-diṭṭhi) and annihilationism (uccheda-diṭṭhi), the basic misconceptions of actuality that in various forms repeatedly reappear in the history of human thought. Eternalism is the belief in a permanent substance or entity, whether conceived as a multitude of individual souls or selves, created or not, as a monistic world-soul, a deity of any description, or a combination of any of these notions.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Penetration of Dharmakya and Dharmadesana -Based on the Different Ideas of Dharani and Tathagatagarbha
    On the Penetration of Dharmakya and Dharmadesana -based on the different ideas of dharani and tathagatagarbha- Kakusho U jike We can recognize many developements of the Buddhakaya theory in the evo- lution of Mahayana thought systems which are related to various doctrines such as the Vi jnanavada, etc. In my opinion, the Buddhakaya theory stressed how the Bodhisattvas or any living being can meet the eternal Buddha and enjoy the benefits of instruction on enlightenment from him. In the Mahayana, the concept of truth also developed parallel with the Bud- dhakaya theory and the most important theme for the Mahayanist is how to understand the nature of the Buddha who became one with the truth (dharma- kaya). That is to say, the problem of how to realize the truth is the same pro- blem of how to meet the eternal Buddha with the joy of uniting oneself with the realm of the Buddha's enlightenment (dharmadhatu). In this situation one's faculties are always tested in the effort to encounter and understand the real teaching of the Buddha, because the truth revealed by the Buddha is quite high and deep, going beyond the intellect of ordinary people The Buddha's teaching is understood only by eminent Bodhisattvas who possess the super power of hearing the subtle voice of the Buddha. One of the excellent means of the Bodhisattvas for hearing, memorizing, and preaching etc., the teachings of the Buddha is considered to be the dharani. Dharani seemed to appear at first in the Prajnaparamita-sutras or in other Sutras having close relation to theme).
    [Show full text]
  • The Buddhist Conception of Reality
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE The Buddhist Conception of Reality Daisetz T. Suzuki There is one question every earnest-minded man will ask as soon as he grows old, or rather, young enough to reason about things, and that is: “Why are we here?” or “What is the significance of life here?” The question may not always take this form; it will vary according to the surroundings and circum­ stances in which the questioner may happen to find himself. Once up to the horizon of consciousness, this question is quite a stubborn one and will not stop disturbing one’s peace of mind. It will insist on getting a satisfactory answer one way or another. This inquiry after the significance or value of life is no idle one, and no verbal quibble will gratify the inquirer for he is ready to give his life for it. We fre­ quently hear in Japan of young men committing suicide, despairing at their inability to solve the question. While this is a hasty and in a way cowardly deed, they are so upset that they do not know what they are doing; they are altogether beside themselves. This questioning about the significance of life is tantamount to seeking after ultimate reality. Ultimate reality may sound to some people too philosophical and they may regard it as of no concern to them. They may regard it outside their domain of interest, and the subject I am going to speak about tonight is liable to be put aside as belonging to the professional business of a class of peo­ ple known as philosophers.
    [Show full text]
  • Ontology of Consciousness
    Ontology of Consciousness Percipient Action edited by Helmut Wautischer A Bradford Book The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England ( 2008 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or me- chanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from the publisher. MIT Press books may be purchased at special quantity discounts for business or sales promotional use. For information, please e-mail [email protected] or write to Special Sales Depart- ment, The MIT Press, 55 Hayward Street, Cambridge, MA 02142. This book was set in Stone Serif and Stone Sans on 3B2 by Asco Typesetters, Hong Kong, and was printed and bound in the United States of America. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Ontology of consciousness : percipient action / edited by Helmut Wautischer. p. cm. ‘‘A Bradford book.’’ Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-262-23259-3 (hardcover : alk. paper)—ISBN 978-0-262-73184-3 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Consciousness. 2. Philosophical anthropology. 3. Culture—Philosophy. 4. Neuropsychology— Philosophy. 5. Mind and body. I. Wautischer, Helmut. B105.C477O58 2008 126—dc22 2006033823 10987654321 Index Abaluya culture (Kenya), 519 as limitation of Turing machines, 362 Abba Macarius of Egypt, 166 as opportunity, 365, 371 Abhidharma in dualism, person as extension of matter, as guides to Buddhist thought and practice, 167, 454 10–13, 58 in focus of attention, 336 basic content, 58 in measurement of intervals, 315 in Asanga’s ‘‘Compendium of Abhidharma’’ in regrouping of elements, 335, 344 (Abhidharma-samuccaya), 67 in technical causality, 169, 177 in Maudgalyayana’s ‘‘On the Origin of shamanic separation from body, 145 Designations’’ Prajnapti–sastra,73 Action, 252–268.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Syllabus for Higher Diploma Course In
    Syllabus for Higher Diploma Course in Buddhist Studies (A course applicable to students of the University Department) From the Academic Year 2020–2021 Approved by the Ad-hoc Board of Studies in Pali Literature and Culture Savitribai Phule Pune University 1 Savitribai Phule Pune University Higher Diploma Course in Buddhist Studies General Instructions about the Course, the Pattern of Examination and the Syllabus I. General Instructions I.1 General Structure: Higher Diploma Course in Buddhist Studies is a three-year course of semester pattern. It consists of six semesters and sixteen papers of 50 marks each. I.2 Eligibility: • Passed Advanced Certificate Course in Buddhist Studies • Passed H.S.C. or any other equivalent examination with Sanskrit / Pali / Chinese / Tibetan as one subject. I.3 Duration: Three academic years I.4 Fees: The Admission fee, the Tuition Fee, Examination Fee, Record Fee, Statement of Marks for each year of the three-year Higher Diploma course will be as per the rules of the Savitribai Phule Pune University. I.5 Teaching: • Medium of instruction - English or Marathi • Lectures: Semesters I and II - Four lectures per week for fifteen weeks each Semesters III to VI – Six lectures per week for fifteen weeks each II Pattern of Examination II.1 Assessment and Evaluation: • Higher Diploma Course examination will be held once at the end of each semester of the academic year. • The examination for the Higher Diploma Course will consist of an external examination carrying 40 marks of two hours duration and an internal examination of 10 marks for all the sixteen papers.
    [Show full text]
  • Mindfulness and the Buddha's Noble Eightfold Path
    Chapter 3 Mindfulness and the Buddha’s Noble Eightfold Path Malcolm Huxter 3.1 Introduction In the late 1970s, Kabat-Zinn, an immunologist, was on a Buddhist meditation retreat practicing mindfulness meditation. Inspired by the personal benefits, he de- veloped a strong intention to share these skills with those who would not normally attend retreats or wish to practice meditation. Kabat-Zinn developed and began con- ducting mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) in 1979. He defined mindful- ness as, “the awareness that emerges through paying attention on purpose, in the present moment, and non-judgmentally to the unfolding of experience moment to moment” (Kabat-Zinn 2003, p. 145). Since the establishment of MBSR, thousands of individuals have reduced psychological and physical suffering by attending these programs (see www.unmassmed.edu/cfm/mbsr/). Furthermore, the research into and popularity of mindfulness and mindfulness-based programs in medical and psychological settings has grown exponentially (Kabat-Zinn 2009). Kabat-Zinn (1990) deliberately detached the language and practice of mind- fulness from its Buddhist origins so that it would be more readily acceptable in Western health settings (Kabat-Zinn 1990). Despite a lack of consensus about the finer details (Singh et al. 2008), Kabat-Zinn’s operational definition of mindfulness remains possibly the most referred to in the field. Dozens of empirically validated mindfulness-based programs have emerged in the past three decades. However, the most acknowledged approaches include: MBSR (Kabat-Zinn 1990), dialectical behavior therapy (DBT; Linehan 1993), acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT; Hayes et al. 1999), and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT; Segal et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kayas / Bodies of a Buddha
    The Kayas / Bodies of a Buddha The original meaning of the Sanskrit word Kaya (Tibetan: sku/ku) is 'that which is accumulated'. In English Kaya is translated as 'body'. However, the Kayas of Buddhas do not literally refer only to the form aggregates of Buddhas but also to Buddhas themselves, to their various attributes, and so forth. There are different ways to categorize Kayas: 1. The category into five Kayas 2. The category into four Kayas 3. The category into three Kayas 4. The category into two Kayas 1. The category into five Kayas The category into five Kayas refers to: I. The Dharmakaya / Truth Body (chos sku / choe ku) II. The Svabhavakaya / Nature Body (ngo bo nyid sku / ngo wo nyi ku) III. The Jnanakaya / Wisdom Truth Body (ye shes chos sku / ye she choe ku) IV. The Sambhogakaya / Enjoyment Body (longs sku / long ku) V. The Nimanakaya / Emanation Body (sprul sku / truel ku) Here the basis of the category is Kaya, which means that Kaya is categorized or classified into the five Kayas. I. The Dharmakaya / Truth Body Kaya and Dharmakaya are synonymous. Whatever is a Kaya is necessarily a Dharmakaya and vice versa. The definition of a Dharmakaya is: a final Kaya that is attained in dependence on meditating on its attaining agents, the three exalted knowers. The three exalted knowers are: a) Knower of basis (the Arya paths in the continua of Hearers and Solitary Realizers) b) Knower of paths (the Arya paths in the continua of Buddhas and of Bodhisattvas who have reached the Mahayana path of seeing or the Mahayana path of meditation) c) Exalted knower of aspects (the Arya paths, that is, omniscient mental consciousnesses, in the continua of Buddhas) II.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gandavyuha-Sutra : a Study of Wealth, Gender and Power in an Indian Buddhist Narrative
    The Gandavyuha-sutra : a Study of Wealth, Gender and Power in an Indian Buddhist Narrative Douglas Edward Osto Thesis for a Doctor of Philosophy Degree School of Oriental and African Studies University of London 2004 1 ProQuest Number: 10673053 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10673053 Published by ProQuest LLC(2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 Abstract The Gandavyuha-sutra: a Study of Wealth, Gender and Power in an Indian Buddhist Narrative In this thesis, I examine the roles of wealth, gender and power in the Mahay ana Buddhist scripture known as the Gandavyuha-sutra, using contemporary textual theory, narratology and worldview analysis. I argue that the wealth, gender and power of the spiritual guides (kalyanamitras , literally ‘good friends’) in this narrative reflect the social and political hierarchies and patterns of Buddhist patronage in ancient Indian during the time of its compilation. In order to do this, I divide the study into three parts. In part I, ‘Text and Context’, I first investigate what is currently known about the origins and development of the Gandavyuha, its extant manuscripts, translations and modern scholarship.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dōgen Zenji´S 'Gakudō Yōjin-Shū' from a Theravada Perspective
    The Dōgen Zenji´s ‘Gakudō Yōjin-shū’ from a Theravada Perspective Ricardo Sasaki Introduction Zen principles and concepts are often taken as mystical statements or poetical observations left for its adepts to use his/her “intuitions” and experience in order to understand them. Zen itself is presented as a teaching beyond scriptures, mysterious, transmitted from heart to heart, and impermeable to logic and reason. “A special transmission outside the teachings, that does not rely on words and letters,” is a well known statement attributed to its mythical founder, Bodhidharma. To know Zen one has to experience it directly, it is said. As Steven Heine and Dale S. Wright said, “The image of Zen as rejecting all forms of ordinary language is reinforced by a wide variety of legendary anecdotes about Zen masters who teach in bizarre nonlinguistic ways, such as silence, “shouting and hitting,” or other unusual behaviors. And when the masters do resort to language, they almost never use ordinary referential discourse. Instead they are thought to “point directly” to Zen awakening by paradoxical speech, nonsequiturs, or single words seemingly out of context. Moreover, a few Zen texts recount sacrilegious acts against the sacred canon itself, outrageous acts in which the Buddhist sutras are burned or ripped to shreds.” 1 Western people from a whole generation eager to free themselves from the religion of their families have searched for a spiritual path in which, they hoped, action could be done without having to be explained by logic. Many have founded in Zen a teaching where they could act and think freely as Zen was supposed to be beyond logic and do not be present in the texts - a path fundamentally based on experience, intuition, and immediate feeling.
    [Show full text]