17-0515-EAS Memo

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

17-0515-EAS Memo City of Adak, Alaska Memorandum Date: May 15, 2017 To: City Council From: Layton J. Lockett, City Manager RE: Evaluation of Essential Air Service Proposals 2017-2019 Today we received two proposals for providing Essential Air Service (EAS) for Adak starting October 2017- September 2019. We received proposals from Alaska Airlines and Peninsula Airways (PenAir). The proposals are summarized as follows: • Alaska Airlines o Aircraft: 737-700 all seaters, twice weekly; 737-700 freighter twice monthly o Subsidy: $2,907,935/annual ($22,718.24/Round-trip) o Service type: Nonstop to ANC-ADK; Wednesday & Sunday changing to Wednesday-Saturday with freighter service on Sunday • PenAir o Aircraft: Saab 2000 all seaters, twice weekly o Subsidy: $2,064,545 for year 1,$1,907,045 year 2 ($19,094.18/Round-trip average) o Service type: ANC-CDB-ADK; unknown dates In reviewing the proposals it is my recommendation that the City Council choose the Alaska Airlines proposal based on the following points of analysis: • Alaska Airlines has provided service to Adak for 15 years with jet aircraft • In 2002, when the community had a choice to switch from PenAir to Alaska, 92% of the community polled chose Alaska as its first choice, based on the service PenAir provided to the community at that time. • Alaska Airlines’ proposal provides freight service, allowing seafood shipments and other large shipments to continue. This is especially important with limited barge service. • Although the subsidy request is increasing by $864,315 notwithstanding inflation and other cost factors the community receives an extra two flights per month solely for cargo. This may allow for Hazmat products, currently restricted to freighter aircraft to be tendered to Adak on a regular basis. • PenAir has provided no means for significant cargo capacity; fresh seafood shipments originating from Adak would cease or have to be on chartered aircraft. • Based on Northern Air Cargo’s (NAC) 2015 proposal for air cargo service; an extra $589,071-1,034,071, notwithstanding updated figures related to 2017 costs, would be required to provide adequate lift for Adak’s cargo needs. Note: NAC did not provide a proposal for 2017-2019 service. Total subsidy would be approximately $2,574,866-3,019,866, notwithstanding updated figures from NAC. • PenAir does not seem to have fully accounted for Adak station costs, especially since there has been no contact between the City and PenAir. • PenAir does not have the support of several of the communities that it provides service to, including Cold Bay, Sand Point and Dillingham. Attached is an article from the Dutch Harbor Fisherman describing ongoing issues. Given the service levels seen in the past, choosing the PenAir proposal unnecessarily exposes the community to these problematic issues. CITY OF ADAK, ALASKA 100 Mechanical Street, Suite B122 • Adak, Alaska 99546 Post Office Box 2011 • Adak, Alaska 99546 • Tel: 907.592.4500 • Fax: 907.592.4262 www.adak-ak.us BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, DC Essential Air Service at ) ) Docket DOT-OST-2000-8556 ADAK, ALASKA ) ) PROPOSAL OF PENINSULA AIRWAYS, INC. TO PROVIDE ESSENTIAL AIR SERVICE AT ADAK, ALASKA Correspondence with regard to this document should be addressed to: Scott Bloomquist, President Robert E. Cohn PENINSULA AIRWAYS, INC. Patrick R. Rizzi 6100 Boeing Avenue HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP Anchorage, AK 99502 Columbia Square 555 Thirteenth Street, NW Washington, DC 20004 202 637 4999/5659 [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for Peninsula Airways, Inc. May 12, 2017 \\DC - 004721/000002 - 10304093 v2 BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, DC Essential Air Service at ) ) Docket DOT-OST-2000-8556 ADAK, ALASKA ) ) May 12, 2017 PROPOSAL OF PENINSULA AIRWAYS, INC. TO PROVIDE ESSENTIAL AIR SERVICE AT ADAK, ALASKA Pursuant to DOT Order 2017-3-3 (“Order”), Peninsula Airways, Inc. (“PenAir”) hereby submits its proposal to provide subsidized, year-round essential air service (“EAS”) between Adak, Alaska, and Anchorage, Alaska, for a period of two years, commencing on October 1, 2017. In addition to readily satisfying the requisite criteria set forth in the relevant Statute and the Order, PenAir’s EAS proposal would offer superior benefits for passengers and businesses in the local Adak community and the greater Anchorage area. I. BACKGROUND. PenAir is an established airline with over 60 years of experience in providing reliable scheduled air service, including EAS, to smaller communities. PenAir is based in Anchorage, and for many years, PenAir provided reliable and safe EAS for several communities in Alaska, including Adak.1 It currently provides EAS to the following nine small communities in five states: Presque Isle and Bar Harbor (seasonal), Maine; 1 See, e.g., DOT Order 2000-12-11 (Adak); DOT Order 2009-5-4 (Akutan); DOT Orders 2004-6-20 and 2006- 5-21 (Atka and Nikolski). \\DC - 004721/000002 - 10304093 v2 EAS Proposal of Peninsula Airways, Inc. Adak, Alaska Page 2 Plattsburgh, New York; Crescent City, California; Liberal and Dodge City, Kansas; Kearney, Scottsbluff, and North Platte, Nebraska. PenAir flew more than 385,000 passengers and more than 116.5 million revenue passenger miles in 2016. II. PENAIR’S PROPOSAL OFFERS SIGNIFICANT CAPACITY AND WELL- TIMED SCHEDULES TO/FROM ANCHORAGE. PenAir proposes to provide two weekly roundtrips between Adak (“ADK”), Alaska, and Anchorage (“ANC”), Alaska, with a brief enroute stop at Cold Bay, Alaska. PenAir would operate this service year-round using pressurized, multi-engine Saab 2000 aircraft with 45 passenger seats (in a comfortable 2-by-1 seating configuration), a two-pilot cockpit crew, a flight attendant, in-flight beverage/snack service, and on-board lavatory facilities. This service schedule will provide 180 weekly seats between Adak and Anchorage, which is more than sufficient to comfortably handle the historic passenger traffic on this route. As detailed in Exhibit PENAIR 1, PenAir’s ADK-ANC service would require an annual subsidy of $2,064,545 for the first year and $1,907,045 for the second year. Anchorage is a major destination, in and of itself, for Adak travelers and is also a gateway for connections to other destinations in Alaska and beyond. PenAir’s ADK- ANC schedule will be designed to facilitate convenient connections at ANC with flights of major U.S. carriers to/from numerous other destinations in the United States and with PenAir’s other intra–Alaska flights. \\DC - 004721/000002 - 10304093 v2 EAS Proposal of Peninsula Airways, Inc. Adak, Alaska Page 3 With its experience serving Alaska for more than half a century, including the Aleutian Islands, its years of EAS operations, and its enhanced understanding of the Anchorage market, PenAir is well-situated to provide this vitally important EAS to Adak. III. PENAIR’S SUBSTANTIAL EXPERIENCE PROVIDING EAS AND ITS RELATIONSHIPS WITH OTHER AIRLINES WILL PROVIDE ADDITIONAL BENEFITS FOR PASSENGERS ON THE ADK–ANC ROUTE. In selecting a carrier to provide subsidized essential air service in Alaska, the Department considers six principal factors: (A) service reliability; (B) contractual and marketing arrangements with a larger carrier at the hub; (C) interline arrangements with a larger carrier at the hub; (D) community views; (E) whether the carrier has included a plan in its proposal to market its service to the community; and (F) the experience of the applicant in providing scheduled air service in Alaska, see 49 U.S.C. 41733(c)(1), as well as the relative subsidy requirements. See DOT Order 2017-3-3, at 2 n.2. PenAir excels in these categories, and its proposal provides the Department, the community, and the travelling public with substantial benefits at a reasonable subsidy level by offering highly cost-efficient essential air service appropriately sized in terms of aircraft and frequencies to meet the needs of the community. (A), (F) Service Reliability and Experience in Alaska. PenAir is among the largest and most reliable commuter airlines in the state of Alaska and has had decades of experience in providing scheduled air service in Alaska, including experience serving Adak. It is family-owned and has several hundred employees, the majority of whom have many years of service with the airline. PenAir has more than 60 years of \\DC - 004721/000002 - 10304093 v2 EAS Proposal of Peninsula Airways, Inc. Adak, Alaska Page 4 operational experience in Alaska’s harsh weather environment. It currently operates a fleet of 21 multi-engine passenger and all-cargo Saab 340 and Saab 2000 aircraft, providing vital air service to eight Alaska communities from Anchorage, as well as to 13 communities in the continental United States (including nine EAS communities). PenAir is very familiar with the Department’s EAS Program and the vital importance of providing safe, reliable, and convenient EAS to small communities. Indeed, as the Department knows, PenAir was the very first recipient of an EAS subsidy when the Program began decades ago. Safety is PenAir’s highest priority. PenAir was the first Part 135 U.S. air carrier to become a Part 121 air carrier. The FAA has awarded the Diamond Certificate of Excellence to PenAir for 16 consecutive years. PenAir’s management, crews, mechanics, and dispatchers have relatively unparalleled experience with Saab aircraft in safely and reliably operating from both small, remote airports without control towers (e.g., Dutch Harbor, Alaska; Presque Isle, Maine) and major hubs (e.g., Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport; Boston Logan International Airport), over water (e.g., the Bering Sea; the Atlantic Ocean), and in all types of weather, including the harsh winter weather often encountered in Alaska and the Northeast United States. This experience will be of substantial value to Adak, a small community near the western tip of the Aleutian Islands. PenAir also has had longstanding experience in providing essential air service to Adak.
Recommended publications
  • Appendix 25 Box 31/3 Airline Codes
    March 2021 APPENDIX 25 BOX 31/3 AIRLINE CODES The information in this document is provided as a guide only and is not professional advice, including legal advice. It should not be assumed that the guidance is comprehensive or that it provides a definitive answer in every case. Appendix 25 - SAD Box 31/3 Airline Codes March 2021 Airline code Code description 000 ANTONOV DESIGN BUREAU 001 AMERICAN AIRLINES 005 CONTINENTAL AIRLINES 006 DELTA AIR LINES 012 NORTHWEST AIRLINES 014 AIR CANADA 015 TRANS WORLD AIRLINES 016 UNITED AIRLINES 018 CANADIAN AIRLINES INT 020 LUFTHANSA 023 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. (CARGO) 027 ALASKA AIRLINES 029 LINEAS AER DEL CARIBE (CARGO) 034 MILLON AIR (CARGO) 037 USAIR 042 VARIG BRAZILIAN AIRLINES 043 DRAGONAIR 044 AEROLINEAS ARGENTINAS 045 LAN-CHILE 046 LAV LINEA AERO VENEZOLANA 047 TAP AIR PORTUGAL 048 CYPRUS AIRWAYS 049 CRUZEIRO DO SUL 050 OLYMPIC AIRWAYS 051 LLOYD AEREO BOLIVIANO 053 AER LINGUS 055 ALITALIA 056 CYPRUS TURKISH AIRLINES 057 AIR FRANCE 058 INDIAN AIRLINES 060 FLIGHT WEST AIRLINES 061 AIR SEYCHELLES 062 DAN-AIR SERVICES 063 AIR CALEDONIE INTERNATIONAL 064 CSA CZECHOSLOVAK AIRLINES 065 SAUDI ARABIAN 066 NORONTAIR 067 AIR MOOREA 068 LAM-LINHAS AEREAS MOCAMBIQUE Page 2 of 19 Appendix 25 - SAD Box 31/3 Airline Codes March 2021 Airline code Code description 069 LAPA 070 SYRIAN ARAB AIRLINES 071 ETHIOPIAN AIRLINES 072 GULF AIR 073 IRAQI AIRWAYS 074 KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES 075 IBERIA 076 MIDDLE EAST AIRLINES 077 EGYPTAIR 078 AERO CALIFORNIA 079 PHILIPPINE AIRLINES 080 LOT POLISH AIRLINES 081 QANTAS AIRWAYS
    [Show full text]
  • Market Report a Publication of Saab Aircraft Leasing
    Issue 27 December 2011 MARKET REPORT A PUBLICATION OF SAAB AIRCRAFT LEASING DARWIN DEVELOPS EUROPEAN NETWORK PlottING A NEW COURSE GULFSTREAM INTERNATIONAL ADDS SAAB 340Bplus AIRCRAFT AND BECOMES SILVER AIRWAYS messaGE FROM CONTENTS Michael Magnusson Golden Air shines as niche Swedish carrier ......................... 3-5 Reflecting on 2011 activity and Darwin develops European network .................................... 6-9 readying for next year’s priorities Flying to the finish line. .................................................... 10-12 Pinnacle positions .................................................................13 As 2011 draws to a close, we can look back over a busy year during which Lakeshore luxury ..................................................................13 we transacted business on many Saab Plotting a new course 340Bplus aircraft. As we have taken Gulfstream International adds Saab 340Bplus aircraft aircraft back from Mesaba, we have found and becomes Silver Airways ........................................... 14-16 new homes for them with both old and new customers. The 30-seat turboprop Saab 340 operators in Thailand expand regional airline service ...........................................................17 continues to be a perfect regional aircraft choice on many regional routes. Saab Destination: Scatsta Airport, Shetland – Scotland. ......18 We are especially pleased that a revitalized Gulfstream International Airlines in Saab 340 Global Operators Conference set for 2012 ...........19 Florida, soon
    [Show full text]
  • August 2020 9/22/2020
    JOHN GLENN COLUMBUS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Monthly Activity Report | August 2020 9/22/2020 PASSENGERS Total Passengers - Monthly Total Passengers - Year to Date Actual Percent Actual Percent Airline 2020 2019 2020 2019 Change Change Change Change Air Canada Express - 6,881 -6,881 -100.0% 9,500 49,873 -40,373 -81.0% Alaska 4,983 8,321 -3,338 -40.1% 32,191 48,081 -15,890 -33.0% American 54,615 178,793 -124,178 -69.5% 539,521 1,364,292 -824,771 -60.5% Delta 39,530 169,765 -130,235 -76.7% 414,257 1,219,149 -804,892 -66.0% Frontier 4,127 11,314 -7,187 -63.5% 31,578 79,074 -47,496 -60.1% Southwest 83,081 227,487 -144,406 -63.5% 828,263 1,891,271 -1,063,008 -56.2% Spirit 19,723 33,135 -13,412 -40.5% 161,028 308,445 -147,417 -47.8% United 25,420 100,227 -74,807 -74.6% 262,542 737,649 -475,107 -64.4% AIRLINES TOTALS 231,479 735,923 -504,444 -68.5% 2,278,880 5,697,834 -3,418,954 -60.0% CHARTER TOTALS 617 1,517 -900 -59.3% 9,291 28,997 -19,706 -68.0% AIRPORT TOTALS 232,096 737,440 -505,344 -68.5% 2,288,171 5,726,831 -3,438,660 -60.0% CARGO Total Cargo (Freight and Mail) - Monthly Total Cargo (Freight and Mail) - Year-To-Date Actual Percent Actual Percent Airline 2020 2019 2020 2019 Change Change Change Change Alaska 51,752 35,047 16,705 47.7% 115,122 173,379 -58,257 -33.6% American 34,506 145,812 -111,306 -76.3% 516,109 1,189,222 -673,113 -56.6% Delta 109,455 189,574 -80,119 -42.3% 854,336 1,356,604 -502,268 -37.0% Southwest 236,161 424,511 -188,350 -44.4% 2,386,755 3,157,189 -770,434 -24.4% United 11,804 101,862 -90,058 -88.4% 243,792 786,206 -542,414
    [Show full text]
  • Essential Air Service (EAS) Communities (Excluding Alaska and Hawaii)* As of February 2020
    Eligible Essential Air Service (EAS) communities (excluding Alaska and Hawaii)* as of February 2020 State EAS Community Docket # at www.regulations.gov Alabama Muscle Shoals DOT-OST-2000-7856 Arizona Page DOT-OST-1997-2694 Arizona Prescott DOT-OST-1996-1899 Arizona Show Low DOT-OST-1998-4409 Arkansas El Dorado/Camden DOT-OST-1997-2935 Arkansas Harrison DOT-OST-1997-2935 Arkansas Hot Springs DOT-OST-1997-2935 Arkansas Jonesboro DOT-OST-1997-2935 California Crescent City DOT-OST-1997-2649 California El Centro DOT-OST-2008-0299 California Merced DOT-OST-1998-3521 California Visalia*** DOT-OST-2004-19916 Colorado Alamosa DOT-OST-1997-2960 Colorado Cortez DOT-OST-1998-3508 Colorado Pueblo DOT-OST-1999-6589 Georgia Macon DOT-OST-2007-28671 Illinois Decatur DOT-OST-2006-23929 Illinois Marion/Herrin DOT-OST-2000-7881 Illinois Quincy DOT-OST-2003-14492 Iowa Burlington DOT-OST-2001-8731 Iowa Fort Dodge DOT-OST-2001-10682 Iowa Mason City DOT-OST-2001-10684 Eligible Essential Air Service (EAS) communities (excluding Alaska and Hawaii)* as of February 2020 State EAS Community Docket # at www.regulations.gov Iowa Sioux City** DOT-OST-2011-0131 Iowa Waterloo DOT-OST-2011-0132 Kansas Dodge City DOT-OST-1998-3502 Kansas Garden City DOT-OST-1998-3503 Kansas Hays DOT-OST-1998-3497 Kansas Liberal/Guymon, OK DOT-OST-1998-3498 Kansas Salina DOT-OST-2002-11376 Kentucky Owensboro DOT-OST-2000-7855 Kentucky Paducah DOT-OST-2009-0299 Maine Augusta/Waterville DOT-OST-1997-2784 Maine Bar Harbor DOT-OST-2011-0138 Maine Presque Isle/Houlton DOT-OST-2000-8012 Maine Rockland DOT-OST-1997-2784 Michigan Alpena DOT-OST-2009-0300 Michigan Escanaba DOT-OST-2003-15128 Michigan Hancock/Houghton DOT-OST-2009-0302 Michigan Iron Mountain/Kingsford DOT-OST-1999-5175 Michigan Ironwood/Ashland, WI DOT-OST-1999-1266 Michigan Manistee/Ludington DOT-OST-1996-1711 Michigan Muskegon DOT-OST-2009-0301 Michigan Pellston DOT-OST-2011-0133 Michigan Sault Ste.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Economic August 1999
    ALASKA ECONOMIC AUGUST 1999 S TRENDSTREND The Trends 100 The Trends 100 The Trends 100 The Trends 100 The Trends 100 The Trends 100 The Trends 100 The Trends 100 The Trends 100 The Trends 100 The 100 Private Firms with the Largest Number of Employees in Alaska in 1998 Tony Knowles, Governor of Alaska Department of Labor and Workforce Development August 1999 ALASKA ECONOMIC Department Volume 19 Name Number 8 Changes ISSN 0160-3345 TRENDShttp://www.labor.state.ak.us/research/research.htm Alaska Economic As part of the Trends is a monthly Tony Knowles, Governor of Alaska consolidation of publication dealing departments, the with a variety of Ed Flanagan, Commissioner of Labor Alaska Department economic-related of Labor is now called issues in the state. and Workforce Development the Department of Labor and Workforce Alaska Economic Development. Trends is funded by the Employment Diana Kelm, Editor The Employment Security Division and Security Division published by the Joanne Erskine, Associate Editor will encompass the Alaska Department of job training programs Labor and Workforce formerly located in Development, P.O. Email Trends authors at: the Department of Box 21149, Juneau, Community and Alaska 99802-1149. Regional Affairs. [email protected] The vocational Printed and distributed rehabilitation by Assets, Inc., a programs formerly in vocational training [email protected] the Department of and employment Education are also program, at a cost of being transferred to $.70 per copy. August Trends authors are Labor Economists AKDOL. with the Research and Analysis Section, For more information, Administrative Services Division, The transfer of call the AKDOL Department of Labor and Workforce Development programs associated Publications Office at with department (907) 465-6019 or in Anchorage.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Adjustments to Service Obligations
    Served: May 12, 2020 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C. CONTINUATION OF CERTAIN AIR SERVICE PURSUANT TO PUBLIC LAW NO. 116-136 §§ 4005 AND 4114(b) Docket DOT-OST-2020-0037 NOTICE OF ADJUSTMENTS TO SERVICE OBLIGATIONS Summary By this notice, the U.S. Department of Transportation (the Department) announces an opportunity for incremental adjustments to service obligations under Order 2020-4-2, issued April 7, 2020, in light of ongoing challenges faced by U.S. airlines due to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) public health emergency. With this notice as the initial step, the Department will use a systematic process to allow covered carriers1 to reduce the number of points they must serve as a proportion of their total service obligation, subject to certain restrictions explained below.2 Covered carriers must submit prioritized lists of points to which they wish to suspend service no later than 5:00 PM (EDT), May 18, 2020. DOT will adjudicate these requests simultaneously and publish its tentative decisions for public comment before finalizing the point exemptions. As explained further below, every community that was served by a covered carrier prior to March 1, 2020, will continue to receive service from at least one covered carrier. The exemption process in Order 2020-4-2 will continue to be available to air carriers to address other facts and circumstances. Background On March 27, 2020, the President signed the Coronavirus Aid, Recovery, and Economic Security Act (the CARES Act) into law. Sections 4005 and 4114(b) of the CARES Act authorize the Secretary to require, “to the extent reasonable and practicable,” an air carrier receiving financial assistance under the Act to maintain scheduled air transportation service as the Secretary deems necessary to ensure services to any point served by that air carrier before March 1, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Economy of the Essential Air Service Program
    Department of Economics Working Paper Series The Political Economy of the Essential Air Service Program Joshua Hall, Amanda Ross and Christopher Yencha Working Paper No. 15-18 This paper can be found at the College of Business and Economics Working Paper Series homepage: http://be.wvu.edu/phd_economics/working-papers.htm The Political Economy of the Essential Air Service Program Joshua Hall* Associate Professor of Economics West Virginia University PO Box 6025 Morgantown, WV 26506 [email protected] Amanda Ross West Virginia University PO Box 6025 Morgantown, WV 26506 [email protected] Christopher Yencha West Virginia University PO Box 6025 Morgantown, WV 26506 [email protected] Abstract We find that congressional influences affect the amount of airport subsidies that a congressional district receives from the Essential Air Service (EAS) program. The EAS program was passed with the goal of helping to continue commercial air service to rural communities following the deregulation of the airline industry. Using subsidy data from 1998-2014, we find strong evidence that subsidies are higher in districts having congressional representation on the House Transportation Committee. Representation on the House Appropriations Committee is also associated with higher subsidies. Our empirical results, combined with news reports, are consistent with the EAS serving private as well as public interests. Keywords: congressional dominance, deregulation, airports JEL Codes: D73, L93 * Corresponding author. The authors would like to acknowledge the helpful comments of E. Frank Stephenson, John Dove, Jamie Bologna, and session participants at the 2015 Public Choice Society meetings in San Antonio, TX. The political economy of the Essential Air Service program 1 Introduction The structure of the airline industry in the United States changed dramatically in 1978 with the passage of the Airline Deregulation Act (ADA).
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Transportation Bureau of Transportation Statistics Office of Airline Information
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BUREAU OF TRANSPORTATION STATISTICS OFFICE OF AIRLINE INFORMATION ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING DIRECTIVE No. 328 Issue Date: 10-1-2018 Effective Date: 01-01-2019 Part: 241 Section: 04 AIR CARRIER GROUPINGS This Accounting and Reporting Directive updates the reporting groups for filing the Form 41 report during calendar year 2019 and replaces Reporting Directive No. 325. From our review, the reporting carrier groupings for the carriers below are updated as indicated: AIR CARRIER: NEW REPORTING GROUP: Aloha Air Cargo Group I - $20 million to $100 million to Group II Express Jet Group III to Group II National Airlines Group I - $20 million to $100 million to Group II Republic Group II to Group III SkyLease Group I - $20 million to $100 million to Group II Swift Group I - $20 million to $100 million to Group II Western Global Group I - $20 million to $100 million to Group II Carriers are grouped according to the operating revenue boundaries contained in Section 04 of Part 241. The current reporting levels are: Group III Over $1 billion; Group II Over $100 million to $1 billion; Group I $100 million and under, Subgroups: Group I - $20 million to $100 million, Group I - Under $20 million. Changes in the reporting groups are effective January 1, 2019. Any questions regarding the groupings should be directed to [email protected]. William Chadwick, Jr. Director Office of Airline Information Attachment ATTACHMENT PAGE 1 OF 3 GROUP III AIR CARRIERS - 17 CARRIER Alaska Airlines Allegiant Air American Airlines Atlas Air
    [Show full text]
  • United States District Court for the District of Columbia
    Case 1:10-cv-02076-EGS Document 35 Filed 06/10/11 Page 1 of 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) NORTHERN AIR CARGO, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, ) Civil Action No. 10-2076 (EGS) ) Defendant, ) ) and ) ) PENINSULA AIRWAYS, INC., ) ) Defendant-Intervenor. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION On December 3, 2010, the United States Postal Service (the “Postal Service”) granted an equitable tender of nonpriority mainline bypass mail to Peninsula Airways, Inc. (“PenAir”) on five mainline routes in rural Alaska pursuant to 39 U.S.C. § 5402(g)(5)(c) (“§ 5402(g)(5)(C)”). This equitable tender is now being challenged by three mainline carriers – Northern Air Cargo (“NAC”), Tatonduk Outfitters Ltd d/b/a Everts Air Cargo (“Everts”), and Lynden Air Cargo LLC (“Lynden”) (collectively, “plaintiffs”). Specifically, plaintiffs challenge the Postal Service’s purportedly ultra vires determination that PenAir had satisfied the “Prior Service and Capacity Requirement” of 39 U.S.C. § 5402(g)(1)(A)(iv)(II) (“§ 5402(g)(1)(A)(iv)(II)”) as of Case 1:10-cv-02076-EGS Document 35 Filed 06/10/11 Page 2 of 25 December 3, 2010.1 Plaintiffs seek both declaratory and injunctive relief. See generally Compl. Pending before the Court is plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, as well as the cross-motions for summary judgment filed by Defendant Postal Service and Defendant-Intervenor PenAir (collectively, “defendants”). Upon consideration of the motions, the responses and replies thereto, the applicable law, the entire record, and for the following reasons, the Court hereby DENIES plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and GRANTS defendants’ cross-motions for summary judgment.
    [Show full text]
  • Bristol Bay Subarea Contingency Plan
    BRISTOL BAY SUBAREA CONTINGENCY PLAN RESOURCES SECTION RESOURCES: PART ONE – COMMUNITY PROFILES ............................................................. B-1 A. Regional Organizations................................................................................ B-1 B. Community Profiles ..................................................................................... B-6 RESOURCES: PART TWO – EQUIPMENT ................................................................................. B-79 A. Commercially Available Equipment ......................................................... B-81 B. Government Spill Response Equipment .................................................... B-83 C. Industry/Spill Cooperative Equipment ...................................................... B-88 RESOURCES: PART THREE – INFORMATION DIRECTORY .............................................. B-89 A. Airports and Air Services .......................................................................... B-90 B. Bird and other Wildlife Response .............................................................. B-94 C. Contractors: BOA and Term ..................................................................... B-95 D. Historic Properties Protection .................................................................... B-95 E. Emergency Services/Managers .................................................................. B-96 F. Fishing Fleets and Organizations ............................................................... B-96 G. Government Contacts and Information
    [Show full text]
  • TED STEVENS ANCHORAGE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Anchorage, Alaska
    TED STEVENS ANCHORAGE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Anchorage, Alaska PFC Quarterly Report - Receipts Collected For the Quarter Ended March 31,2009 (Application No. 1 ) Application #99-01-C-00-ANC & 99-01-C-01-ANC $22,000,000.00 0.00 Total Collection Authority $22,000,000.00 PFC Revenue Received Air Carriers Current Quarter Previous Quarters Cumulative Aces Airlines 32.12 32.12 Aer Lingus 317.44 317.44 Aerovias De Mexico 122.58 122.58 Aero Mexico 98.53 98.53 Air Canada 136,476.21 136,476.21 Air France 1,764.99 1,764.99 Air New Zealand 2,094.33 2,094.33 Air Pacific 8.67 8.67 Airlines Services Corporation 37.96 37.96 Air Wisconsin Airlines 46.54 46.54 Alaska Airlines 11,024,874.06 11,024,874.06 Alitalia Airlines 1,051.51 1,051.51 All Nippon Airways Co 1,905.64 1,905.64 Aloha Airlines 7,152.82 7,152.82 America Central Corp 23.36 23.36 America West Airlines 228,474.04 228,474.04 American Airlines 509,508.22 509,508.22 American Trans Air 6,513.14 6,513.14 Asiana Airlines 2,125.95 2,125.95 Atlantic Coast Airline 96.36 96.36 Avianca 8.76 8.76 Big Sky Airlines 87.36 87.36 British Airways 12,272.36 12,272.36 Canada 3000 10,999.72 10,999.72 Cathay Pacific Airways 271.27 271.27 China Airlines 78,473.09 78,473.09 Condor Flugdienst, GMBH 63,889.95 63,889.95 Continental Airlines 1,380,859.31 1,380,859.31 Czech Airlines 348.36 348.36 Delta Airlines 1,673,182.33 1,673,182.33 Elal Israel Airlines 110.74 110.74 Emirates 14.57 14.57 Era Aviation, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Essential Air Service: Frequently Asked Questions
    Essential Air Service: Frequently Asked Questions Rachel Tang Analyst in Transportation Policy March 3, 2011 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R41666 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Essential Air Service: Frequently Asked Questions Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................1 What is Essential Air Service?.....................................................................................................1 How Is EAS Funded?..................................................................................................................2 What Are the Eligibility Requirements? ......................................................................................2 How Many Communities Are Receiving EAS Subsidies?............................................................2 How Does DOT Select EAS Carriers?.........................................................................................2 What Are the Current Legislative Issues? ....................................................................................3 Appendixes Appendix A. List of Subsidized EAS outside of Alaska ...............................................................4 Appendix B. List of Subsidized EAS in Alaska ...........................................................................8 Contacts Author Contact Information ........................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]