1 Uncorrected Preprint Final Publication Details

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1 Uncorrected Preprint Final Publication Details Uncorrected Preprint Final publication details: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102477 Received 4 June 2020; Accepted 7 July 2020; 2352-409/© 2020. THE TIP CROSS-SECTIONAL AREAS OF POISONED BONE ARROWHEADS FROM SOUTHERN AFRICA Marlize Lombard Palaeo-Research Institute, University of Johannesburg, P.O. Box 524, Auckland Park, ZA-2006, South Africa. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Current hunter-gatherers from the Kalahari in southern Africa are well-known for their use of poisoned arrowheads, and it is assumed that this tradition spanned most of the Holocene in the region. Recent archaeological work, however, indicates that the techno-behaviour may have originated sometime during the Pleistocene. Tracing the use of poisoned arrowheads through time is not an easy task. Here I explore the use of the tip cross-sectional area (TSCA) metric to analyse relatively large samples of bone points that are ethno-historically associated with Kalahari San poisoned arrow hunting. I add the southern African poisoned bone arrowhead TSCA range to the previous ranges established for North American atlatl dart tips, North American arrowheads and large thrusting spears. Based on the results obtained from 445 artefacts spanning historical, Later and Middle Stone Age phases, I show that poisoned bone arrowheads may have been in use in southern Africa throughout the last 60 000 years, and that a methodical effort to trace stone-tipped poison arrowheads may be warranted. Keywords: poisoned arrows, bow hunting, Kalahari San, Middle Stone Age, arrow morphology Introduction Today, the Kalahari San of southern Africa are renowned for their use of relatively small bows and light-weight poisoned arrows, and there is a plethora of ethno-historical literature on the topic (Sparrman 1785; Stow 1905; Theal 1919; Schapera 1927; Dunn 1931; Lebzelter 1934; Vinnicombe 1971; Shaw et al. 1963; Marshall 1976; Lee 1979; Wiessner 1983; Deacon 1992; Webley 1994; Nadler 2005; Wadley et al. 2015; Chaboo et al. 2016; Backwell et al. 2018; Hitchcock et al. 2019). The origin of this hunting system, is however, a matter of debate (d’Errico et al. 2012a,b; Evans 2012; Bradfield et al. 2015). The tip cross-sectional area (TCSA) metric is a ballistically significant standard 1 that works well for discriminating between, North American atlatl or spear-thrower dart tips, North American arrowheads and large experimental stabbing spears (Shea 2006; Sisk & Shea 2010). Using this metric, Shea (2006) concluded that his results did not support the hypothesis of the widespread use of stone-tipped atlatl darts or arrows in Africa before ~40 ka – an interpretation supported by Villa and Lenoir (2006). Bone points, although plausible weapon tips, were excluded from his analysis, because at the time they were considered to be “too few and too rare to be the focus of an investigation into broader patterns of projectile point origins and variability” (Shea 2006: 824). By now, the TCSA metric has been used widely for interpreting variation in stone-tipped weapon- delivery systems and in experimental replications of such systems (see several chapters in Iovita & Sano 2016; also see discussion in Villa & Lenoir 2006). The metric is useful, because it represents the part of the weapon that cuts the animal’s hide, creating a hole for the shaft to enter (Hughes 1998), and it may influence weapon flight and penetration dynamics (Maki 2013). Regardless of point type, only maximum width and thickness measurements are needed for calculating the TCSA metric (0.5 x maximum width x maximum thickness = TCSA value). This allows for the largest possible sample sizes to be compared directly with each other, and for studies to be easily replicated. Sisk and Shea (2011) used TCSA values in combination with the tip cross-sectional perimeter (TCSP), which they deemed a more accurate proxy of the force needed to penetrate a target to a lethal depth. The drawback of the TCSP approach (when it comes to the interpretation of archaeological material as opposed to modern experimentation), is that penetration depth is invariably also affected by the mass of the shaft and the traits of the propelling mechanism, which cannot be known for archaeological bone- or stone-tipped weapons. Also, when poison is used, depth of penetration does not have to be lethal. Instead, all that is needed, is for the hide to be cut so that the poison may enter the prey animal’s bloodstream – making the TCSA metric the most relevant. The TCSP metric is furthermore limited to stone points, and cannot be applied to backed geometrics (Sisk & Shea 2010), which currently represent the earliest evidence for bow hunting with stone-tipped or barbed arrows (Lombard & Phillipson 2010; Lombard 2011). TCSA analysis on the other hand, can be applied to these backed artefacts (Wadley & Mohapi 2008; Sano et al. 2019), as well as to bone points (Bradfield 2010). Brooks and colleagues (2006) emphasised weight as the most important aspect of weapon tips, based on the prediction that lighter projectiles require greater acceleration to achieve adequate penetration. Yet, similar to the TCSP metric, the weight of a weapon tip represents only a portion of a weapon’s mass, and the weight of the shaft cannot be known for archaeological material where these elements do not preserve. I also need to draw attention to the fact that any metric approach to weapon function, whether TCSA, TCSP, penetrating angle or mass, is only able to assess the potential of artefacts to function in the 2 context of different weapon-delivery systems. These approaches can never demonstrate such use empirically. For example, Ötzi’s well-known stone-bladed knife seen on its own, would be interpreted as a spear tip with a TCSA value of 92 (measured from the drawing of Wierer et al. 2018: 6). Yet, because it was found hafted, we know it was a knife blade instead. Two more stone points found with Ötzi have TCSA values of 40 and 45 respectively, which would fall in the lower range of North American atlatls and the higher range of North American arrows. But, because they were found hafted in arrow shafts notched to fit a bowstring, we know their explicit function. For direct evidence that any ancient, haftless stone artefact functioned as a weapon tip, detailed and multi-stranded use-trace analyses are needed (Lombard 2005, 2006, 2011; Lombard & Phillipson 2010; also see Newman & Moore 2013; Clarkson 2016; Hutchings 2016). The overlap in Shea’s (2006) dart and arrow tip categories also reveals the false sense of security in purely quantitative studies. When dealing with the human past, numbers alone can seldom reveal the nuances necessary for a deep understanding of techno-behaviours – for that a measure of qualitative assessment and interpretation is required. That being said, TCSA analysis is a pragmatic approach for analysing considerable sample sizes across spatiotemporal boundaries in a directly comparable manner, and therefore apt for building broad hypotheses about ancient weapon-delivery systems (Sano et al. 2016). This is especially true when interpretations of the results are backed up by ethno-historical, experimental and use-trace data. Here I argue that it may also be useful for assessing a tool class’s potential to function as a poisoned arrowhead, and that the TCSA range for this category of weapon tips has yet to be established. In the southern African context, the most secure starting point for such investigation is bone points. Kalahari San hunter-gatherers still use bone, as well as very small iron tips, for poisoned arrow hunting (Wadley et al. 2015; Alam 2019). Many museums across the world now have relatively large collections of San bow-hunting kits with quivers full of ethno-historically collected poisoned bone- tipped arrows (Fig. 1). The function of the bone points themselves is therefore incontestable. Although arrow link-shafts, needles and awls cannot be excluded from the bone point category, careful morphological and use-trace work shows that in most cases, relatively thin and straight Later Stone Age bone points served as arrowheads (Bradfield 2012, 2015, 2016). What is more, several archaeological pieces also still have visible poison remains. 3 Figure 1. 1a: Arrows collected from the Cape of Good Hope, South Africa, by Atherstone in 1863 now housed in the Kew Economic Botany Collection in London, UK. 1b: Bone point arrowheads that became separated from the Atherstone arrows and poison collected with them. 1c: The hunter-gatherer quiver and arrows that were collected by Sparrman in 1777 from San hunter-gatherers in the Eastern Cape, South Africa, now curated at the Ethnographic Museum in Stockholm, Sweden. 1d & e: Details of other ethno-historically collected poisoned bone arrowheads from southern Africa housed at the Ethnographic Museum in Stockholm. (All photographs by Anders Högberg©.) Initially it was thought that poisoned bone arrowheads were used in southern Africa only after ~8 ka (ka=thousand years old/ago) (Inskeep 1987; Noli 1993). The last decade, however, saw some indication that archaeological bone points from the region, dating to more than 30 ka, may have been used to tip poisoned arrows (d’Errico et al. 2012; Robbins et al. 2012). Most recently, we reported that a bone point of >60 ka, from Klasies River Mouth in the Eastern Cape, South Africa, has a residue that may be poison based on its distribution and the interpretation of preliminary non-destructive Raman spectra (Bradfield et al. 2020). This point, as well as one from Sibudu Cave in KwaZulu- Natal, South Africa, of similar age (Bradfield & Lombard 2011; Backwell et al. 2018), also displays macro- and micro-fractures that are consistent with stresses caused by high-velocity impact, such as arrow use (Bradfield et al. 2020). With this contribution I aim to establish the TCSA range for poisoned bone arrowheads from southern Africa to complement the set of standards currently in use as established by Shea (2006).
Recommended publications
  • South African Palaeo-Scientists the Names Listed Below Are Just Some of South Africa’S Excellent Researchers Who Are Working Towards Understanding Our African Origins
    2010 African Origins Research MAP_Layout 1 2010/04/15 11:02 AM Page 1 South African Palaeo-scientists The names listed below are just some of South Africa’s excellent researchers who are working towards understanding our African origins. UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN (UCT) Dr Thalassa Matthews analyses the Dr Job Kibii focuses PALAEOBIOLOGICAL RESEARCH thousands of tiny teeth and bones of fossil on how fossil hominid Professor Anusuya Chinsamy-Turan is one microfauna to reconstruct palaeoenviron- and non-hominid of only a few specialists in the world who mental and climatic changes on the west faunal communities coast over the last 5 million years. changed over time and African Origins Research studies the microscopic structure of bones of dinosaurs, pterosaurs and mammal-like uses this to reconstruct reptiles in order to interpret various aspects ALBANY MUSEUM, past palaeoenviron- of the biology of extinct animals. GRAHAMSTOWN ments and palaeo- A summary of current research into fossils of animals, plants and early hominids from the beginning of life on Earth to the Middle Stone Age PERMIAN AGE PLANTS ecology. THE HOFMEYR SKULL Dr Rose Prevec studies the “No other country in the world can boast the oldest evidence of life on Earth extending back more than 3 billion years, the oldest multi-cellular animals, the oldest land-living plants, Professor Alan Morris described the Glossopteris flora of South Africa (the PAST HUMAN BEHAVIOUR Hofmeyer skull, a prehistoric, fossilized ancient forests that formed our coal Professor Chris Henshilwood directs the most distant ancestors of dinosaurs, the most complete record of the more than 80 million year ancestry of mammals, and, together with several other African countries, a most remarkable human skull about 36 000 years old deposits) and their end-Permian excavations at Blombos Cave where that corroborates genetic evidence that extinction.
    [Show full text]
  • Use-Trace Analysis of Bone Tools: a Brief Overview of Four
    South African Archaeological Bulletin 70 (201): 3–14, 2015 3 Research Article USE-TRACE ANALYSIS OF BONE TOOLS: A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF FOUR METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES JUSTIN BRADFIELD Department of Anthropology and Development Studies, University of Johannesburg, P.O. Box 524, Auckland Park, Johannesburg, 2006, South Africa E-mail: [email protected] (Received January 2015. Revised April 2015) ABSTRACT until mechanical failure results in a fracture (Johnson 1985; In comparison with some other parts of the world, there has been a Lakes et al. 1990; Kim et al. 2006; Rennick 2012). Adhesive wear marked lack of engagement with the functional study of bone tools in arises from frictional contact between two surfaces. However, southern Africa. Only a handful of researchers are actively conducting instead of resulting in material attrition, as occurs with abrasive work on this important aspect of material culture on the sub- wear, material from one object is transferred to the other continent. In this paper, I explore four avenues of use-trace analyses (LeMoine 1994; Francis 2002). The contact material is identified, that can be used to investigate the past function of bone tools, namely, based on the residue of the adhering material. Chemical wear is use-wear, macrofracture analysis, morphological residues studies and the physical alteration of a tool surface due to chemical action, micro-focus computed tomography. Despite the increasing application which normally occurs after deposition but which can also of sophisticated analytical software, definitions of use-traces still differ occur as a result of contact with skin and other acidic sub- among analysts. Here I provide a brief overview of various use-trace stances or organic enzymes.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleoanthropology Society Meeting Abstracts, Memphis, Tn, 17-18 April 2012
    PALEOANTHROPOLOGY SOCIETY MEETING ABSTRACTS, MEMPHIS, TN, 17-18 APRIL 2012 Paleolithic Foragers of the Hrazdan Gorge, Armenia Daniel Adler, Anthropology, University of Connecticut, USA B. Yeritsyan, Archaeology, Institute of Archaeology & Ethnography, ARMENIA K. Wilkinson, Archaeology, Winchester University, UNITED KINGDOM R. Pinhasi, Archaeology, UC Cork, IRELAND B. Gasparyan, Archaeology, Institute of Archaeology & Ethnography, ARMENIA For more than a century numerous archaeological sites attributed to the Middle Paleolithic have been investigated in the Southern Caucasus, but to date few have been excavated, analyzed, or dated using modern techniques. Thus only a handful of sites provide the contextual data necessary to address evolutionary questions regarding regional hominin adaptations and life-ways. This talk will consider current archaeological research in the Southern Caucasus, specifically that being conducted in the Republic of Armenia. While the relative frequency of well-studied Middle Paleolithic sites in the Southern Caucasus is low, those considered in this talk, Nor Geghi 1 (late Middle Pleistocene) and Lusakert Cave 1 (Upper Pleistocene), span a variety of environmental, temporal, and cultural contexts that provide fragmentary glimpses into what were complex and evolving patterns of subsistence, settlement, and mobility over the last ~200,000 years. While a sample of two sites is too small to attempt a serious reconstruction of Middle Paleolithic life-ways across such a vast and environmentally diverse region, the sites
    [Show full text]
  • Director's Report for the Period
    DIRECTOR'S REPORT FOR THE PERIOD January–December 2006 NAME OF RESEARCH ENTITY: Bernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Research NAME OF DIRECTOR: Professor BS Rubidge Contents: Page 1 Staff and appointments 2 2 Research undertaken 5 3 Publications 15 4 Conferences 23 5 Visits to other Institutions 28 6 Visiting and/or collaborating scientists 29 7 Lecturing and students 31 8 Outreach Programme 33 9 Curation of Collections 35 10 Proposed research programme 2006 37 11 Conclusion 45 With devolution of the administration of research entities to Faculties rather than the Research Office, a written annual report is no longer required by the University. However for our own records it is useful to document the activities of the BPI Palaeontology on an annual basis, as otherwise there is a real risk that important details of Institutional history will be lost sight of and disappear from memory. 1. STAFF 1.1 BPI Palaeontology Staff 1. 1.1 ACADEMIC STAFF in research entity on 31 December 2006 DESIGNA NAME GRADE R G D DATE OF RETIREME COMMENT TION BIRTH NT/TERMI (% NATION APPOITMEN DATE T, ETC) Professor Rubidge, B. NS05 W M - 1 Jun 1956 1 Jun 2016 BPIPAL 66% URC; 33% FOC Reader Berger, L. NS06 W M - 22 Dec 22 Dec 2025 Science Faculty, 1965 33%, URC paid 66% Researcher Backwell, L. NSO8 W F 2 Sep. 1 Oct 2025 Faculty 33%; 1966 URC 66 % Researcher Yates, A. NS08 W M - 13 Mar 13 Mar 2032 Replaced Alain 1972 Renaut URC paid Senior Bamford, M. NS07 W F - 25 Oct 25 Oct 2021 BPIPAL 66% Researcher 1961 URC; 33% FOC 2 1.1.2 SUPPORT STAFF in research entity on 31 December 2006 Retirement/ Position Surname R G D Date of Birth Termination Comment Date UNIVERSITY Curator Raath, M.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining-Modernities.Pdf (1.145Mb)
    Defining Modernities Interpretations of Cultural Modernity in the Southern African Middle Stone Age Jonathan Siqveland Masters thesis in Archaeology Spring 2015 Defining Modernities I Defining Modernities Preface First and foremost, I would like to thank my supervisor Dr. Sheila Coulson for detailed comments, and assistance in creating a realistic scope for the project. It was also very valuable to have a supervisor with insights and interests in the dispute over cultural modernity. I would also like to thank Dr. Sarah Wurz, for the opportunity to be a part of the Klasies River Mouth 2015 field team. Excavating at Klasies River Mouth was an invaluable experience. I thank all of my friends who have made the writing process enjoyable. Thanks to my fellow students, especially Anette Sand-Eriksen, Eirik Haug Røe, Isak Roalkvam, Erlend Kirkeng Jørgensen, Maria Svendsen, and Stine Urke Brunstad for constructive comments and tips. Further, I must give many thanks to the rest of my friends and flatmates for being social. Thanks also to Håvard N. Sønsteby for constructive comments and discussions. I thank my parents for general support, and constructive comments. Last, but not least, I thank Sofie Scheen Jahnsen for encouragement, discussions and support. Oslo, May 2015 Jonathan Siqveland II Defining Modernities III Defining Modernities Contents Preface....................................................................................................................................... II Contents ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1: Fifty Years of Fun with Fossils: Some Cave Taphonomy
    stone age institute publication series Series Editors Kathy Schick and Nicholas Toth Stone Age Institute Gosport, Indiana and Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana Number 1. THE OLDOWAN: Case Studies into the Earliest Stone Age Nicholas Toth and Kathy Schick, editors Number 2. BREATHING LIFE INTO FOSSILS: Taphonomic Studies in Honor of C.K. (Bob) Brain Travis Rayne Pickering, Kathy Schick, and Nicholas Toth, editors Number 3. THE CUTTING EDGE: New Approaches to the Archaeology of Human Origins Kathy Schick, and Nicholas Toth, editors Number 4. THE HUMAN BRAIN EVOLVING: Paleoneurological Studies in Honor of Ralph L. Holloway Douglas Broadfield, Michael Yuan, Kathy Schick and Nicholas Toth, editors STONE AGE INSTITUTE PUBLICATION SERIES NUMBER 2 Series Editors Kathy Schick and Nicholas Toth breathing life into fossils: Taphonomic Studies in Honor of C.K. (Bob) Brain Editors Travis Rayne Pickering University of Wisconsin, Madison Kathy Schick Indiana University Nicholas Toth Indiana University Stone Age Institute Press · www.stoneageinstitute.org 1392 W. Dittemore Road · Gosport, IN 47433 COVER CAPTIONS AND CREDITS. Front cover, clockwise from top left. Top left: Artist’s reconstruction of the depositional context of Swartkrans Cave, South Africa, with a leopard consuming a hominid carcass in a tree outside the cave: bones would subsequently wash into the cave and be incorporated in the breccia deposits. © 1985 Jay H. Matternes. Top right: The Swartkrans cave deposits in South Africa, where excavations have yielded many hominids and other animal fossils. ©1985 David L. Brill. Bottom right: Reconstruction of a hominid being carried by a leopard. © 1985 Jay H. Matternes. Bottom left: Photograph of a leopard mandible and the skull cap of a hominid from Swartkrans, with the leopard’s canines juxtaposed with puncture marks likely produced by a leopard carrying its hominid prey.
    [Show full text]
  • Curren T Anthropology
    Forthcoming Current Anthropology Wenner-Gren Symposium Curren Supplementary Issues (in order of appearance) t VOLUME 54 SUPPLEMENT 8 DECEMBER 2013 Crisis, Value, and Hope: Rethinking the Economy. Susana Narotzky and Anthropolog Current Niko Besnier, eds. e Anthropology of Christianity: Unity, Diversity, New Directions. Joel Robbins and Naomi Haynes, eds. Anthropology Politics of the Urban Poor. Veena Das and Shalini Randeria, eds. y Previously Published Supplementary Issues THE WENNER-GREN SYMPOSIUM SERIES December 2013 Working Memory: Beyond Language and Symbolism. omas Wynn and ALTERNATIVE PATHWAYS TO COMPLEXITY: Frederick L. Coolidge, eds. EVOLUTIONARY TRAJECTORIES IN THE MIDDLE Engaged Anthropology: Diversity and Dilemmas. Setha M. Low and Sally PALEOLITHIC AND MIDDLE STONE AGE Engle Merry, eds. GUEST EDITORS: STEVEN L. KUHN AND ERELLA HOVERS Corporate Lives: New Perspectives on the Social Life of the Corporate Form. Damani Partridge, Marina Welker, and Rebecca Hardin, eds. Alternative Pathways to Complexity V e Origins of Agriculture: New Data, New Ideas. T. Douglas Price and olum Mediterranean and Red Sea Paleoclimate Ofer Bar-Yosef, eds. Neanderthal Demographic Estimates e 54 Agreements and Misunderstandings among Three Scientific Fields e Biological Anthropology of Living Human Populations: World Histories, National Styles, and International Networks. Susan Lindee Hominin Evolution in the Middle-Late Pleistocene and Ricardo Ventura Santos, eds. Variability in the Middle Stone Age of Eastern Africa Supplement Roots of the Middle Paleolithic in Eurasia Human Biology and the Origins of Homo. Susan Antón and Leslie C. Aiello, eds. Middle Stone Age Hunting Strategies and Diet Breadth Trends versus Conservatism in the Predatory Niche Potentiality and Humanness: Revisiting the Anthropological Object in Technological Trends in the Middle Stone Age of South Africa Contemporary Biomedicine.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying Mechanisms Behind Middle Paleolithic and Middle Stone Age Cultural Trajectories Francesco D’Errico, William E
    Identifying mechanisms behind Middle Paleolithic and Middle Stone Age cultural trajectories Francesco d’Errico, William E. Banks To cite this version: Francesco d’Errico, William E. Banks. Identifying mechanisms behind Middle Paleolithic and Middle Stone Age cultural trajectories. Current Anthropology, University of Chicago Press, 2013, 54 (S8), pp.S371-S387. 10.1086/673388. hal-01842788 HAL Id: hal-01842788 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01842788 Submitted on 16 Nov 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Identifying Mechanisms behind Middle Paleolithic and Middle Stone Age Cultural Trajectories Author(s): Francesco d’Errico and William E. Banks Source: Current Anthropology, Vol. 54, No. S8, Alternative Pathways to Complexity: Evolutionary Trajectories in the Middle Paleolithic and Middle Stone Age (December 2013), pp. S371-S387 Published by: The University of Chicago Press on behalf of Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/673388 . Accessed: 20/01/2014 09:24 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive.
    [Show full text]
  • CATALOGUE 2009 | 2010 WITS UNIVERSITY PRESS Is Strategically Placed at the Crossroads of African and Global Knowledge Productio N and Dissemination
    CATALOGUE 2009 | 2010 WITS UNIVERSITY PRESS is strategically placed at the crossroads of African and global knowledge productio n and dissemination. We are committed to publishing well- researched, innovative books for both academic and general readers. Our areas of focus include art and heritage, popular scien ce, history and politics, biography, literary studies, women’s writing and select textbooks. Physical address: 23 Junction Ave, Parktown, Johannesburg Postal address : P O Wits, 2050, South Africa Tel: +27 11 484 5906/07/10/13 Fax: +27 11 484 5971 Online: http://witspress.wits.ac.za Cover photograph by Alon Skuy, taken from Go Home or Die Here: Violence, Xenophobia and the Reinvention of Difference in South Africa, page 188. Design and layout: HotHouse South Africa CATALOGUE 2009 | 2010 CONTENTS Politics 2 Migration Studies 6 Cultural Studies 9 Environmental Studies 14 Social Sciences 16 Biography 18 Heritage Studies 21 Historical Archaeology 23 History 24 Anthropology 26 Rock Art 28 Wits P&DM Series 30 Literary Studies 32 Popular Culture 35 Film/Theatre 36 Education 41 African Treasury Series 42 Women’s Writing 44 Art/Photography 48 Popular Science 52 Natural Sciences 53 Textbooks 54 Backlist 58 Index 61 POLITICS NEW Mbeki and After TITLE Reflections on the Legacy of Thabo Mbeki Edited by Daryl Glaser For nearly ten years – indeed more if we include his period of influence under Mandela’s presidency – Thabo Mbeki bestrode South Africa’s political stage. Despite attempts by some in the new ANC leadership to airbrush out his role, there can be little doubt that Mbeki was a seminal figure in South Africa’s new democracy, one who left a huge mark in many fields, perhaps most controversially in state and party management, economic policy, public health intervention, foreign affairs and race relations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Sibudu Cave
    Journal of Archaeological Science 39 (2012) 2479e2495 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Journal of Archaeological Science journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jas Identifying regional variability in Middle Stone Age bone technology: The case of Sibudu Cave Francesco d’Errico a,b,*, Lucinda R. Backwell c,d, Lyn Wadley d,e a Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS-UMR 5199 PACEA, Equipe Préhistoire, Paléoenvironnement, Patrimoine, Avenue des Facultés, F-33405 Talence, France b Institute for Archaeology, History, Cultural and Religious Studies, University of Bergen, Norway c Bernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Research, School of Geosciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3, Wits 2050, South Africa d Institute for Human Evolution, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3, Wits 2050, South Africa e School of Geography, Archaeology and Environmental Studies, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3, Wits 2050, South Africa article info abstract Article history: A few pieces of worked bone were previously reported from Sibudu, a site from KwaZulu-Natal in South Received 14 December 2011 Africa featuring a stratigraphic sequence with pre-Still Bay, Still Bay, Howiesons Poort, post-Howiesons Received in revised form Poort, late and final MSA cultural horizons. Here we describe an expanded collection of worked bones, 27 January 2012 including twenty-three pieces. Technological and use-wear analysis of these objects, and their Accepted 29 January 2012 comparison with experimental and ethnographic data, reveals that a number of specialised bone tool types (wedges, pièces esquillées, pressure flakers, smoothers, sequentially notched pieces), previously Keywords: known only from the Upper Palaeolithic and more recent periods, were manufactured and used at least Still Bay Howiesons Poort 30,000 years earlier at Sibudu Cave.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2018 2
    SAPIENCE CENTRE FOR EARLY SAPIENS BEHAVIOUR UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN ANNUAL REPORT 2018 2 STATEMENT FROM THE CHAIR OF THE BOARD As chair of the board, it has been truly exciting to observe the progress of SapienCE through 2018. At this early stage, the project is already delivering important scientific results, a solid list of publications and attracted world-wide publicity. The University of Bergen and The Faculty of Humanities are naturally very proud hosts. Particularly, I would like to emphasise how impressive it is to see how the project has successfully brought together young, energetic talent and excellent established researchers in a truly cross-disciplinary and co-operative international group. This is a great achievement reached only because there is both a solid scientific core, yet also space for interpretation, imagination and vision. Of course, a project like this also requires a high degree of organization and administration. The administrative staff in different departments and at the faculty have done a great job in setting up the project and keeping it running. From the perspective of the university, it is of particular significance that the consortium of different institutions and departments manages to cooperate smoothly. I can report that the board meetings so far have proceeded in a positive and friendly manner. It is however no secret that CoE’s are sometimes known to pose challenges to institutional structures, and there will be room for differences and open discussions if such are needed in the future. My sincerest thanks go to everybody who has contributed to the impressive results of SapienCE in 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribute to Brain Titlepage.Indd
    stone age institute publication series Series Editors Kathy Schick and Nicholas Toth Stone Age Institute Gosport, Indiana and Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana Number 1. THE OLDOWAN: Case Studies into the Earliest Stone Age Nicholas Toth and Kathy Schick, editors Number 2. BREATHING LIFE INTO FOSSILS: Taphonomic Studies in Honor of C.K. (Bob) Brain Travis Rayne Pickering, Kathy Schick, and Nicholas Toth, editors Number 3. THE CUTTING EDGE: New Approaches to the Archaeology of Human Origins Kathy Schick, and Nicholas Toth, editors Number 4. THE HUMAN BRAIN EVOLVING: Paleoneurological Studies in Honor of Ralph L. Holloway Douglas Broadfield, Michael Yuan, Kathy Schick and Nicholas Toth, editors THE STONE AGE INSTITUTE PRESS PUBLICATION SERIES COMMENT BY SERIES EDITORS The Stone Age Institute Press has been established to publish critical research into the archae- ology of human origins. The Stone Age Institute is a federally-approved non-profi t organization whose mission is investigating and understanding the origins and development of human technol- ogy and culture throughout the course of human evolution. The ultimate goal of these undertakings is to provide a better understanding of the human species and our place in nature. An unbroken line of technology and culture extends from our present day back in time at least two-and-a-half million years. The earliest stone tool-makers were upright-walking, small-brained ape-men, and from these primordial origins, the human lineage embarked upon a pathway that is extraordinary and unique in the history of life. This evolutionary pathway has shaped our bodies, our brains, and our way of life, and has had an ever-accelerating impact on the earth and its other organisms.
    [Show full text]