Dsc Pub Edited

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dsc Pub Edited 1962 25) Because of a malfunction in the Atlas guid- Ranger 3 ance system (due to faulty transistors), the Nation: U.S. (12) probe was inserted into a lunar transfer tra- Objective(s): lunar impact jectory with an excessive velocity. A subse- Spacecraft: P-34 quent incorrect course change ensured that Spacecraft Mass: 330 kg the spacecraft reached the Moon 14 hours Mission Design and Management: NASA JPL early and missed it by 36,793 kilometers on 28 Launch Vehicle: Atlas-Agena B (no. 3 / Atlas D January. The central computer and sequencer no. 121 / Agena B no. 6003) failed and the spacecraft returned no TV Launch Date and Time: 26 January 1962 / images. The probe did, however, provide scien- 20:30 UT tists with the first measurements of interplan- Launch Site: ETR / launch complex 12 etary gamma-ray flux. Ranger 3 eventually Scientific Instruments: entered heliocentric orbit. 1) imaging system 2) gamma-ray spectrometer 26) 3) single-axis seismometer Ranger 4 4) surface-scanning pulse radio Nation: U.S. (13) experiment Objective(s): lunar impact Results: This was the first U.S. attempt to Spacecraft: P-35 achieve impact on the lunar surface. The Block Spacecraft Mass: 331.12 kg II Ranger spacecraft carried a TV camera that Mission Design and Management: NASA JPL used an optical telescope that would allow Launch Vehicle: Atlas-Agena B (no. 4 / Atlas D imaging down to about 24 kilometers above no. 133 / Agena B no. 6004) the lunar surface during the descent. The Launch Date and Time: 23 April 1962 / main bus also carried a 42.6-kilogram instru- 20:50 UT ment capsule that would separate from the Launch Site: ETR / launch complex 12 bus at 21.4 kilometers altitude and then inde- Scientific Instruments: pendently impact on the Moon. Protected by a 1) imaging system balsa-wood outer casing, the capsule was 2) gamma-ray spectrometer designed to bounce several times on the lunar 3) single-axis seismometer surface before coming to rest. The primary 4) surface-scanning pulse radio onboard instrument was a seismometer. experiment 1962 33 Results: This spacecraft, similar in design to 28) Ranger 3, was the first U.S. spacecraft to no name / [Venera] reach another celestial body. A power failure Nation: USSR (14) in the central computer and sequencer Objective(s): Venus impact stopped the spacecraft’s master clock and Spacecraft: 2MV-1 (no. 1) prevented the vehicle from performing any Spacecraft Mass: 1,097 kg of its preplanned operations, such as Mission Design and Management: OKB-1 opening its solar panels. Drifting aimlessly Launch Vehicle: 8K78 (no. T103-12) and without any midcourse corrections, Launch Date and Time: 25 August 1962 / Ranger 4 impacted the Moon on its far side 02:18:45 UT at 12:49:53 UT on 26 April 1962. Impact Launch Site: NIIP-5 / launch site 1 coordinates were 15°30' south latitude and Scientific Instruments: unknown 130°42' west longitude. Although the space- Results: This mission was the first of a second craft did not achieve its primary objective, generation of Soviet deep space probes based the Atlas-Agena-Ranger combination per- on a unified platform called 2MV (“2” for the formed without fault for the first time. second generation, “MV” for Mars and Venus) designed to study Mars and Venus. The series 27) included four variants with the same bus but Mariner 1 with different payload complements: 2MV-1 Nation: U.S. (14) (for Venus impact), 2MV-2 (for Venus flyby), Objective(s): Venus flyby 2MV-3 (for Mars impact), and 2MV-4 (for Mars Spacecraft: P-37 / Mariner R-1 flyby). The landers carried pressurized cap- Spacecraft Mass: 202.8 kg sules; the Venus landers were cooled with an Mission Design and Management: NASA JPL ammonia-based system, while the Mars lan- Launch Vehicle: Atlas-Agena B (no. 5 / Atlas D ders used a system of air conditioners. Both no. 145 / Agena B no. 6901) landers were sterilized with a special sub- Launch Date and Time: 22 July 1962 / stance on recommendation from the Academy 09:21:23 UT of Sciences’s Institute of Microbiology. The Launch Site: ETR / launch complex 12 buses were powered by solar panels with an Scientific Instruments: area of 2.5 square meters capable of providing 1) microwave radiometer 2.6 A. For Venus, the Soviets prepared three 2) infrared radiometer spacecraft for the August-September 1962 3) fluxgate magnetometer launch window, one flyby spacecraft and two 4) cosmic dust detector landers. This first spacecraft was successfully 5) solar plasma spectrometer launched into Earth orbit, but the Blok L 6) energetic particle detectors upper stage cut off its interplanetary burn Results: After approval by NASA Headquarters after only 45 seconds (instead of the planned in September 1961, JPL prepared three space- 240 seconds). Later investigation showed that craft based on the design of the Ranger Block the stage had been set on a tumbling motion I series (therefore named Mariner R) to fly by prior to main engine ignition due to asymmet- Venus in late 1962. Each spacecraft carried a rical firing of stabilizing motors. The space- modest suite (9 kilograms) of scientific instru- craft remained in Earth orbit for three days mentation but had no imaging capability. The before reentering Earth’s atmosphere. spacecraft included 54,000 components and was designed to maintain contact with Earth 29) for 2,500 hours—an ambitious goal given that Mariner 2 the (still unsuccessful) Ranger was designed Nation: U.S. (15) for only 65 hours of contact. Mariner 1 would Objective(s): Venus flyby have flown by Venus at a range of 29,000 kilo- Spacecraft: P-38 / Mariner R-2 meters on 8 December 1962, but due to an Spacecraft Mass: 203.6 kg incorrect trajectory during launch, range Mission Design and Management: NASA JPL safety had to destroy the booster and its pay- Launch Vehicle: Atlas-Agena B (no. 6 / Atlas D load at T+290 seconds. no. 179 / Agena B no. 6902) 34 Deep Space Chronicle Launch Date and Time: 27 August 1962 / Scientific Instruments: unknown 06:53:14 UT Results: This was the second of three Venus Launch Site: ETR / launch complex 12 spacecraft launched by the Soviets in 1962. Scientific Instruments: Like its predecessor launched in August 1962 1) microwave radiometer (also a Venus impact probe), the spacecraft 2) infrared radiometer never left parking orbit around Earth because 3) fluxgate magnetometer of a malfunction in the Blok L upper stage 4) cosmic dust detector designed to send the probe out of Earth orbit 5) solar plasma spectrometer toward Venus. Evidently, the valve that con- 6) energetic particle detectors trolled the delivery of fuel into the combustion Results: NASA brought the Mariner R-2 space- chamber of the Blok L engine (the S1.5400) craft out of storage and launched it just never opened. As a result, the engine never thirty-six days after the failure of Mariner 1. fired. The payload decayed within five days of Mariner 2, as it was known after launch, was launch. equipped with an identical complement of instrumentation to that of its predecessor (see 31) Mariner 1). The mission proved to be the first no name / [Venera] fully successful interplanetary mission per- Nation: USSR (16) formed by any nation. After a midcourse cor- Objective(s): Venus flyby rection on 4 September, the spacecraft flew by Spacecraft: 2MV-2 (no. 1) Venus at a range of 34,762 kilometers on 14 Spacecraft Mass: unknown December 1962. During a 42-minute scan of Mission Design and Management: OKB-1 the planet, Mariner 2 gathered significant Launch Vehicle: 8K78 (no. T103-114) data on the Venusian atmosphere and surface Launch Date and Time: 12 September 1962 / before continuing on to heliocentric orbit. 00:59:13 UT NASA maintained contact until 07:00 UT on Launch Site: NIIP-5 / launch site 1 3 January 1963, when the spacecraft was 87.4 Scientific Instruments: million kilometers from Earth, a new record 1) imaging system for a deep space probe. The data returned (remainder unknown) showed that the surface temperature on Venus Results: Like its two predecessors (launched was at least 425°C with minimal differentia- on 25 August and 1 September 1962), this tion between the day and night sides of the Soviet Venus probe never left parking orbit planet. Mariner 2 also found that there was a around the Earth. The Blok L upper stage, dense cloud layer that extended from 56 to 80 designed to send the spacecraft toward kilometers above the surface. The spacecraft Venus, fired for only 0.8 seconds before shut- detected no discernable planetary magnetic ting down because of unstable attitude. Later field; this lack is partly explained by the great investigation indicated that the upper stage distance of the flyby. After this successful mis- had been put into a tumble by the violent sion, NASA elected to stand down the third shutdown of the third stage. The tumble had spacecraft in the series (Mariner R-3), sched- mixed air bubbles within the propellant uled for the 1964 launch window. tanks, preventing a clean firing of the engine. Unlike its predecessors, this probe was 30) designed for a Venus flyby rather than atmos- no name / [Venera] pheric entry and impact. The spacecraft reen- Nation: USSR (15) tered Earth’s atmosphere two days after Objective(s): Venus impact launch. Spacecraft: 2MV-1 (no. 2) Spacecraft Mass: c. 1,100 kg 32) Mission Design and Management: OKB-1 Ranger 5 Launch Vehicle: 8K78 (no. T103-13) Nation: U.S. (16) Launch Date and Time: 1 September 1962 / Objective(s): lunar impact 02:12:30 UT Spacecraft: P-36 Launch Site: NIIP-5 / launch site 1 Spacecraft Mass: 342.46 kg 1962 35 Mission Design and Management: NASA JPL spacecraft.
Recommended publications
  • The Space Impact of the Euro Crisis 50 Years After Mariner 2: Exploration at a Crossroads
    0827_SPN_DOM_00_019_00 (READ ONLY) 8/24/2012 11:39 AM Page 19 www.spacenews.com SPACENEWS 19 August27, 2012 TheSpaceImpact of the Euro Crisis < ROBBIN LAIRD and HARALD MALMGREN > he European sovereign debt crisis Europe will now be challenged in the ing to hide the reality of European bank of the savings of millions of European is not simply abump in historical form of rollbacks of the many inter- weaknesses. The main reason is that eu- citizens. Tprogress; it is the end of aperiod twined strands of integration, fraying rozone economies are far more bank- European leaders are also attempt- of historyand acritical point in Euro- what has been an intricate but incom- dependent than economies like those in ing to initiate amore comprehensive fis- pean and global transition in the 21st plete tapestry. It is questionable whether the United States or United Kingdom, cal union, with new decision-making century. Europe will be able to prevent stalling of where substantial nonbank financing al- mechanisms that transfer sovereignty in The confluence of several trend lines the integration process in the face of ternatives exist for the corporate sector. parallel with the new banking union. We — the unification of Germany,the end widening gaps among the interests of In the eurozone, banks are the fi- do not believe that any of the eurozone of the Soviet Union, the collapse of the each nation and even within each nation. nancial markets; in the U.S., banks are governments are ready for such apoliti- Berlin Wall, the expansion of NATO, Since the birth of the euro, the but one segment of amultifaceted fi- cal transition in which citizens in each the expansion of the European Union French and Germans were in the lead in nancial market.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Iowa Instruments in Space
    University of Iowa Instruments in Space A-D13-089-5 Wind Van Allen Probes Cluster Mercury Earth Venus Mars Express HaloSat MMS Geotail Mars Voyager 2 Neptune Uranus Juno Pluto Jupiter Saturn Voyager 1 Spaceflight instruments designed and built at the University of Iowa in the Department of Physics & Astronomy (1958-2019) Explorer 1 1958 Feb. 1 OGO 4 1967 July 28 Juno * 2011 Aug. 5 Launch Date Launch Date Launch Date Spacecraft Spacecraft Spacecraft Explorer 3 (U1T9)58 Mar. 26 Injun 5 1(U9T68) Aug. 8 (UT) ExpEloxrpelro r1e r 4 1915985 8F eJbu.l y1 26 OEGxOpl o4rer 41 (IMP-5) 19697 Juunlye 2 281 Juno * 2011 Aug. 5 Explorer 2 (launch failure) 1958 Mar. 5 OGO 5 1968 Mar. 4 Van Allen Probe A * 2012 Aug. 30 ExpPloiorenre 3er 1 1915985 8M Oarc. t2. 611 InEjuxnp lo5rer 45 (SSS) 197618 NAouvg.. 186 Van Allen Probe B * 2012 Aug. 30 ExpPloiorenre 4er 2 1915985 8Ju Nlyo 2v.6 8 EUxpKlo 4r e(rA 4ri1el -(4IM) P-5) 197619 DJuenc.e 1 211 Magnetospheric Multiscale Mission / 1 * 2015 Mar. 12 ExpPloiorenre 5e r 3 (launch failure) 1915985 8A uDge.c 2. 46 EPxpiolonreeerr 4130 (IMP- 6) 19721 Maarr.. 313 HMEaRgCnIe CtousbpeShaetr i(cF oMxu-1ltDis scaatelell itMe)i ssion / 2 * 2021081 J5a nM. a1r2. 12 PionPeioenr e1er 4 1915985 9O cMt.a 1r.1 3 EExpxlpolorerer r4 457 ( S(IMSSP)-7) 19721 SNeopvt.. 1263 HMaalogSnaett oCsupbhee Sriact eMlluitlet i*scale Mission / 3 * 2021081 M5a My a2r1. 12 Pioneer 2 1958 Nov. 8 UK 4 (Ariel-4) 1971 Dec. 11 Magnetospheric Multiscale Mission / 4 * 2015 Mar.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Summaries
    TIROS 8 12/21/63 Delta-22 TIROS-H (A-53) 17B S National Aeronautics and TIROS 9 1/22/65 Delta-28 TIROS-I (A-54) 17A S Space Administration TIROS Operational 2TIROS 10 7/1/65 Delta-32 OT-1 17B S John F. Kennedy Space Center 2ESSA 1 2/3/66 Delta-36 OT-3 (TOS) 17A S Information Summaries 2 2 ESSA 2 2/28/66 Delta-37 OT-2 (TOS) 17B S 2ESSA 3 10/2/66 2Delta-41 TOS-A 1SLC-2E S PMS 031 (KSC) OSO (Orbiting Solar Observatories) Lunar and Planetary 2ESSA 4 1/26/67 2Delta-45 TOS-B 1SLC-2E S June 1999 OSO 1 3/7/62 Delta-8 OSO-A (S-16) 17A S 2ESSA 5 4/20/67 2Delta-48 TOS-C 1SLC-2E S OSO 2 2/3/65 Delta-29 OSO-B2 (S-17) 17B S Mission Launch Launch Payload Launch 2ESSA 6 11/10/67 2Delta-54 TOS-D 1SLC-2E S OSO 8/25/65 Delta-33 OSO-C 17B U Name Date Vehicle Code Pad Results 2ESSA 7 8/16/68 2Delta-58 TOS-E 1SLC-2E S OSO 3 3/8/67 Delta-46 OSO-E1 17A S 2ESSA 8 12/15/68 2Delta-62 TOS-F 1SLC-2E S OSO 4 10/18/67 Delta-53 OSO-D 17B S PIONEER (Lunar) 2ESSA 9 2/26/69 2Delta-67 TOS-G 17B S OSO 5 1/22/69 Delta-64 OSO-F 17B S Pioneer 1 10/11/58 Thor-Able-1 –– 17A U Major NASA 2 1 OSO 6/PAC 8/9/69 Delta-72 OSO-G/PAC 17A S Pioneer 2 11/8/58 Thor-Able-2 –– 17A U IMPROVED TIROS OPERATIONAL 2 1 OSO 7/TETR 3 9/29/71 Delta-85 OSO-H/TETR-D 17A S Pioneer 3 12/6/58 Juno II AM-11 –– 5 U 3ITOS 1/OSCAR 5 1/23/70 2Delta-76 1TIROS-M/OSCAR 1SLC-2W S 2 OSO 8 6/21/75 Delta-112 OSO-1 17B S Pioneer 4 3/3/59 Juno II AM-14 –– 5 S 3NOAA 1 12/11/70 2Delta-81 ITOS-A 1SLC-2W S Launches Pioneer 11/26/59 Atlas-Able-1 –– 14 U 3ITOS 10/21/71 2Delta-86 ITOS-B 1SLC-2E U OGO (Orbiting Geophysical
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1: Venus Missions
    Appendix 1: Venus Missions Sputnik 7 (USSR) Launch 02/04/1961 First attempted Venus atmosphere craft; upper stage failed to leave Earth orbit Venera 1 (USSR) Launch 02/12/1961 First attempted flyby; contact lost en route Mariner 1 (US) Launch 07/22/1961 Attempted flyby; launch failure Sputnik 19 (USSR) Launch 08/25/1962 Attempted flyby, stranded in Earth orbit Mariner 2 (US) Launch 08/27/1962 First successful Venus flyby Sputnik 20 (USSR) Launch 09/01/1962 Attempted flyby, upper stage failure Sputnik 21 (USSR) Launch 09/12/1962 Attempted flyby, upper stage failure Cosmos 21 (USSR) Launch 11/11/1963 Possible Venera engineering test flight or attempted flyby Venera 1964A (USSR) Launch 02/19/1964 Attempted flyby, launch failure Venera 1964B (USSR) Launch 03/01/1964 Attempted flyby, launch failure Cosmos 27 (USSR) Launch 03/27/1964 Attempted flyby, upper stage failure Zond 1 (USSR) Launch 04/02/1964 Venus flyby, contact lost May 14; flyby July 14 Venera 2 (USSR) Launch 11/12/1965 Venus flyby, contact lost en route Venera 3 (USSR) Launch 11/16/1965 Venus lander, contact lost en route, first Venus impact March 1, 1966 Cosmos 96 (USSR) Launch 11/23/1965 Possible attempted landing, craft fragmented in Earth orbit Venera 1965A (USSR) Launch 11/23/1965 Flyby attempt (launch failure) Venera 4 (USSR) Launch 06/12/1967 Successful atmospheric probe, arrived at Venus 10/18/1967 Mariner 5 (US) Launch 06/14/1967 Successful flyby 10/19/1967 Cosmos 167 (USSR) Launch 06/17/1967 Attempted atmospheric probe, stranded in Earth orbit Venera 5 (USSR) Launch 01/05/1969 Returned atmospheric data for 53 min on 05/16/1969 M.
    [Show full text]
  • Mariner to Mercury, Venus and Mars
    NASA Facts National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA 91109 Mariner to Mercury, Venus and Mars Between 1962 and late 1973, NASA’s Jet carry a host of scientific instruments. Some of the Propulsion Laboratory designed and built 10 space- instruments, such as cameras, would need to be point- craft named Mariner to explore the inner solar system ed at the target body it was studying. Other instru- -- visiting the planets Venus, Mars and Mercury for ments were non-directional and studied phenomena the first time, and returning to Venus and Mars for such as magnetic fields and charged particles. JPL additional close observations. The final mission in the engineers proposed to make the Mariners “three-axis- series, Mariner 10, flew past Venus before going on to stabilized,” meaning that unlike other space probes encounter Mercury, after which it returned to Mercury they would not spin. for a total of three flybys. The next-to-last, Mariner Each of the Mariner projects was designed to have 9, became the first ever to orbit another planet when two spacecraft launched on separate rockets, in case it rached Mars for about a year of mapping and mea- of difficulties with the nearly untried launch vehicles. surement. Mariner 1, Mariner 3, and Mariner 8 were in fact lost The Mariners were all relatively small robotic during launch, but their backups were successful. No explorers, each launched on an Atlas rocket with Mariners were lost in later flight to their destination either an Agena or Centaur upper-stage booster, and planets or before completing their scientific missions.
    [Show full text]
  • N€WS 'RELEASE NATIONAL AERONAUTICS and SPACE Admln ISTRATION 400 MARYLAND AVENUE, SW, WASHINGTON 25, D.C
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19630002483 2020-03-11T16:50:02+00:00Z b " N€WS 'RELEASE NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMlN ISTRATION 400 MARYLAND AVENUE, SW, WASHINGTON 25, D.C. TELEPHONES WORTH 2-4155-WORTH. 3-1110 RELEASE NO. 62-182 MARINER SPACECRAFT Mariner 2, the second of a series of spacecraft designed for planetary exploration,- will be launched within a few days (no earlier than August 17) from the Atlantic Missile Range, Cape Canaveral, Florida, by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Mariner 1, launched at 4:21 a.m. (EST) on July 22, 1962 from AMR, was destroyed by the Range Safety Officer after about 290 seconds of flight because of a deviation from the planned flight path. Measures have been taken to correct the difficulties experienced in the Mariner 1 launch. These measures include a more rigorous checkout of the Atlas rate beacon and revision of the data editing equation. The data editing equation Is designed as a guard against acceptance of faulty databy the ground guidance equipment. The Mariner 2 spacecraft and its mission are identical to the first Mariner. Mariner 2 will carry six experiments. Two of these instruments, infrared and microwave radiometers, will make measurements at close range as Mariner 2 flys by Venus and communicate this in€ormation over an interplanetary distance of 36 million miles, Four other experiments on the spacecraft -- a magnetometer, ion chamber and particle flux detector, cosmic dust detector and solar plasma spectrometer -- will gather Information on interplantetary phenomena during the trip to Venus and in the vicinity of the planet.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete List of Contents
    Complete List of Contents Volume 1 Cape Canaveral and the Kennedy Space Center ......213 Publisher’s Note ......................................................... vii Chandra X-Ray Observatory ....................................223 Introduction ................................................................. ix Clementine Mission to the Moon .............................229 Preface to the Third Edition ..................................... xiii Commercial Crewed vehicles ..................................235 Contributors ............................................................. xvii Compton Gamma Ray Observatory .........................240 List of Abbreviations ................................................. xxi Cooperation in Space: U.S. and Russian .................247 Complete List of Contents .................................... xxxiii Dawn Mission ..........................................................254 Deep Impact .............................................................259 Air Traffic Control Satellites ........................................1 Deep Space Network ................................................264 Amateur Radio Satellites .............................................6 Delta Launch Vehicles .............................................271 Ames Research Center ...............................................12 Dynamics Explorers .................................................279 Ansari X Prize ............................................................19 Early-Warning Satellites ..........................................284
    [Show full text]
  • Photographs Written Historical and Descriptive
    CAPE CANAVERAL AIR FORCE STATION, MISSILE ASSEMBLY HAER FL-8-B BUILDING AE HAER FL-8-B (John F. Kennedy Space Center, Hanger AE) Cape Canaveral Brevard County Florida PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD SOUTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 100 Alabama St. NW Atlanta, GA 30303 HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD CAPE CANAVERAL AIR FORCE STATION, MISSILE ASSEMBLY BUILDING AE (Hangar AE) HAER NO. FL-8-B Location: Hangar Road, Cape Canaveral Air Force Station (CCAFS), Industrial Area, Brevard County, Florida. USGS Cape Canaveral, Florida, Quadrangle. Universal Transverse Mercator Coordinates: E 540610 N 3151547, Zone 17, NAD 1983. Date of Construction: 1959 Present Owner: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Present Use: Home to NASA’s Launch Services Program (LSP) and the Launch Vehicle Data Center (LVDC). The LVDC allows engineers to monitor telemetry data during unmanned rocket launches. Significance: Missile Assembly Building AE, commonly called Hangar AE, is nationally significant as the telemetry station for NASA KSC’s unmanned Expendable Launch Vehicle (ELV) program. Since 1961, the building has been the principal facility for monitoring telemetry communications data during ELV launches and until 1995 it processed scientifically significant ELV satellite payloads. Still in operation, Hangar AE is essential to the continuing mission and success of NASA’s unmanned rocket launch program at KSC. It is eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) under Criterion A in the area of Space Exploration as Kennedy Space Center’s (KSC) original Mission Control Center for its program of unmanned launch missions and under Criterion C as a contributing resource in the CCAFS Industrial Area Historic District.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Exploration of Mars Design Reference Architecture 5.0
    July 2009 “We are all . children of this universe. Not just Earth, or Mars, or this System, but the whole grand fireworks. And if we are interested in Mars at all, it is only because we wonder over our past and worry terribly about our possible future.” — Ray Bradbury, 'Mars and the Mind of Man,' 1973 Cover Art: An artist’s concept depicting one of many potential Mars exploration strategies. In this approach, the strengths of combining a central habitat with small pressurized rovers that could extend the exploration range of the crew from the outpost are assessed. Rawlings 2007. NASA/SP–2009–566 Human Exploration of Mars Design Reference Architecture 5.0 Mars Architecture Steering Group NASA Headquarters Bret G. Drake, editor NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas July 2009 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The individuals listed in the appendix assisted in the generation of the concepts as well as the descriptions, images, and data described in this report. Specific contributions to this document were provided by Dave Beaty, Stan Borowski, Bob Cataldo, John Charles, Cassie Conley, Doug Craig, Bret Drake, John Elliot, Chad Edwards, Walt Engelund, Dean Eppler, Stewart Feldman, Jim Garvin, Steve Hoffman, Jeff Jones, Frank Jordan, Sheri Klug, Joel Levine, Jack Mulqueen, Gary Noreen, Hoppy Price, Shawn Quinn, Jerry Sanders, Jim Schier, Lisa Simonsen, George Tahu, and Abhi Tripathi. Available from: NASA Center for AeroSpace Information National Technical Information Service 7115 Standard Drive 5285 Port Royal Road Hanover, MD 21076-1320 Springfield, VA 22161 Phone: 301-621-0390 or 703-605-6000 Fax: 301-621-0134 This report is also available in electronic form at http://ston.jsc.nasa.gov/collections/TRS/ CONTENTS 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Apollo Over the Moon: a View from Orbit (Nasa Sp-362)
    chl APOLLO OVER THE MOON: A VIEW FROM ORBIT (NASA SP-362) Chapter 1 - Introduction Harold Masursky, Farouk El-Baz, Frederick J. Doyle, and Leon J. Kosofsky [For a high resolution picture- click here] Objectives [1] Photography of the lunar surface was considered an important goal of the Apollo program by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The important objectives of Apollo photography were (1) to gather data pertaining to the topography and specific landmarks along the approach paths to the early Apollo landing sites; (2) to obtain high-resolution photographs of the landing sites and surrounding areas to plan lunar surface exploration, and to provide a basis for extrapolating the concentrated observations at the landing sites to nearby areas; and (3) to obtain photographs suitable for regional studies of the lunar geologic environment and the processes that act upon it. Through study of the photographs and all other arrays of information gathered by the Apollo and earlier lunar programs, we may develop an understanding of the evolution of the lunar crust. In this introductory chapter we describe how the Apollo photographic systems were selected and used; how the photographic mission plans were formulated and conducted; how part of the great mass of data is being analyzed and published; and, finally, we describe some of the scientific results. Historically most lunar atlases have used photointerpretive techniques to discuss the possible origins of the Moon's crust and its surface features. The ideas presented in this volume also rely on photointerpretation. However, many ideas are substantiated or expanded by information obtained from the huge arrays of supporting data gathered by Earth-based and orbital sensors, from experiments deployed on the lunar surface, and from studies made of the returned samples.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Software Development – the Hidden Risk * Dr
    Managing Software Development – The Hidden Risk * Dr. Steve Jolly Sensing & Exploration Systems Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company *Based largely on the work: “Is Software Broken?” by Steve Jolly, NASA ASK Magazine, Spring 2009; and the IEEE Fourth International Conference of System of Systems Engineering as “System of Systems in Space 1 Exploration: Is Software Broken?”, Steve Jolly, Albuquerque, New Mexico June 1, 2009 Brief history of spacecraft development • Example of the Mars Exploration Program – Danger – Real-time embedded systems challenge – Fault protection 2 Robotic Mars Exploration 2011 Mars Exploration Program Search: Search: Search: Determine: Characterize: Determine: Aqueous Subsurface Evidence for water Global Extent Subsurface Bio Potential Minerals Ice Found Found of Habitable Ice of Site 3 Found Environments Found In Work Image Credits: NASA/JPL Mars: Easy to Become Infamous … 1. [Unnamed], USSR, 10/10/60, Mars flyby, did not reach Earth orbit 2. [Unnamed], USSR, 10/14/60, Mars flyby, did not reach Earth orbit 3. [Unnamed], USSR, 10/24/62, Mars flyby, achieved Earth orbit only 4. Mars 1, USSR, 11/1/62, Mars flyby, radio failed 5. [Unnamed], USSR, 11/4/62, Mars flyby, achieved Earth orbit only 6. Mariner 3, U.S., 11/5/64, Mars flyby, shroud failed to jettison 7. Mariner 4, U.S. 11/28/64, first successful Mars flyby 7/14/65 8. Zond 2, USSR, 11/30/64, Mars flyby, passed Mars radio failed, no data 9. Mariner 6, U.S., 2/24/69, Mars flyby 7/31/69, returned 75 photos 10. Mariner 7, U.S., 3/27/69, Mars flyby 8/5/69, returned 126 photos 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Getting to Mars How Close Is Mars?
    Getting to Mars How close is Mars? Exploring Mars 1960-2004 Of 42 probes launched: 9 crashed on launch or failed to leave Earth orbit 4 failed en route to Mars 4 failed to stop at Mars 1 failed on entering Mars orbit 1 orbiter crashed on Mars 6 landers crashed on Mars 3 flyby missions succeeded 9 orbiters succeeded 4 landers succeeded 1 lander en route Score so far: Earthlings 16, Martians 25, 1 in play Mars Express Mars Exploration Rover Mars Exploration Rover Mars Exploration Rover 1: Meridiani (Opportunity) 2: Gusev (Spirit) 3: Isidis (Beagle-2) 4: Mars Polar Lander Launch Window 21: Jun-Jul 2003 Mars Express 2003 Jun 2 In Mars orbit Dec 25 Beagle 2 Lander 2003 Jun 2 Crashed at Isidis Dec 25 Spirit/ Rover A 2003 Jun 10 Landed at Gusev Jan 4 Opportunity/ Rover B 2003 Jul 8 Heading to Meridiani on Sunday Launch Window 1: Oct 1960 1M No. 1 1960 Oct 10 Rocket crashed in Siberia 1M No. 2 1960 Oct 14 Rocket crashed in Kazakhstan Launch Window 2: October-November 1962 2MV-4 No. 1 1962 Oct 24 Rocket blew up in parking orbit during Cuban Missile Crisis 2MV-4 No. 2 "Mars-1" 1962 Nov 1 Lost attitude control - Missed Mars by 200000 km 2MV-3 No. 1 1962 Nov 4 Rocket failed to restart in parking orbit The Mars-1 probe Launch Window 3: November 1964 Mariner 3 1964 Nov 5 Failed after launch, nose cone failed to separate Mariner 4 1964 Nov 28 SUCCESS, flyby in Jul 1965 3MV-4 No.
    [Show full text]