DOCSLIB.ORG

Valley Center Storage Project Conceptual Revegetation Plan San

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Valley Center Storage Project Conceptual Revegetation Plan San Valley Center Storage Project Conceptual Revegetation Plan San Diego County, California Project Number: PDS-2020-STP-20-011 Prepared for the County of San Diego Developer: VALLEY CENTER ESS, LLC 11455 El Camino Real, Suite 160 San Diego, CA 92130 Prepared by: CHAMBERS GROUP, INC. 9620 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 202 San Diego, CA 92123 Principal Author: Heather Clayton, Senior Botanist June 24, 2020 Valley Center Storage Project Conceptual Revegetation Plan Valley Center, San Diego County, CA TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SECTION 1.0 – INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 1 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE CONCEPTUAL REVEGETATION PLAN ................................................................ 1 1.2 RESPONSIBLE PARTIES .................................................................................................................. 1 1.3 LOCATION OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT ................................................................................ 1 1.4 SUMMARY OF OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT ....................................................................... 2 1.4.1 Current Environmental Setting and Site Conditions ........................................................ 4 1.4.2 Impacts to Special Status Plant Species ........................................................................... 5 1.4.3 Impacts to Special Status Wildlife .................................................................................... 5 1.4.4 Impacts to Migratory Birds .............................................................................................. 6 SECTION 2.0 – COMPENSATORY MITIGATION GOALS .......................................................................... 7 2.1 RESPONSIBILITIES.......................................................................................................................... 7 2.2 COMPENSATORY MITIGATION ..................................................................................................... 8 2.2.1 Cumulative Impact Analysis ............................................................................................. 9 2.3 TIME LAPSE ................................................................................................................................. 10 2.4 COST ............................................................................................................................................ 10 SECTION 3.0 – COMPENSATORY MITIGATION SITE DESCRIPTION ....................................................... 12 3.1 SITE SELECTION ........................................................................................................................... 12 3.2 LOCATION AND SIZE OF SITE ...................................................................................................... 12 3.3 JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS AND WATERWAYS ........................................................................ 12 3.4 TYPES, FUNCTIONS AND VALUES OF HABITATS TO BE IMPACTED ............................................. 12 3.4.1 Permanent Impacts ........................................................................................................ 13 3.4.2 Temporary Impacts ........................................................................................................ 13 3.4.3 Disturbed Habitat ........................................................................................................... 15 3.4.4 Non-Native Grassland .................................................................................................... 15 3.4.5 Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub: Inland Form........................................................................ 15 3.4.6 Bare Ground ................................................................................................................... 16 3.4.7 Rock ................................................................................................................................ 16 3.4.8 Urban/Developed .......................................................................................................... 16 3.4.9 Extensive Agriculture – Row Crops ................................................................................ 16 3.5 REFERENCE SITES ........................................................................................................................ 17 3.5.1 Reference Site 1 ............................................................................................................. 17 3.5.2 Reference Site 2 ............................................................................................................. 17 SECTION 4.0 – IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ............................................................................................ 18 4.1.1 Rationale for Expecting Implementation Success .......................................................... 18 4.1.2 Financial Assurances ...................................................................................................... 18 4.1.3 Schedule ......................................................................................................................... 18 Chambers Group, Inc. ii 21206 Valley Center Storage Project Conceptual Revegetation Plan Valley Center, San Diego County, CA 4.1.4 Site Preparation ............................................................................................................. 18 4.1.5 Planting Plan .................................................................................................................. 19 4.1.6 Season of Planting .......................................................................................................... 22 4.1.7 Irrigation ......................................................................................................................... 22 SECTION 5.0 – COMPENSATORY MITIGATION SITE MAINTENANCE DURING MONITORING ................. 23 5.1 MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES ......................................................................................................... 23 5.1.1 Proposed Weeding Program .......................................................................................... 23 5.1.2 Proposed Pruning Program ............................................................................................ 23 5.1.3 Proposed Trash Removal Program................................................................................. 23 5.1.4 Proposed Pest Control Program .................................................................................... 24 SECTION 6.0 – COMPENSATORY MITIGATION SITE MONITORING PLAN ............................................. 25 6.1 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS ...................................................................................................... 25 6.1.1 Success Criteria .............................................................................................................. 25 6.1.2 Adaptive Management and Remedial Actions .............................................................. 26 6.1.3 Target Functions and Values .......................................................................................... 26 6.1.4 Target Acreage ............................................................................................................... 27 6.2 MONITORING REQUIREMENTS ................................................................................................... 27 6.2.1 Monitoring Methods ...................................................................................................... 27 6.2.2 Monitoring Schedule ...................................................................................................... 28 6.2.3 Monitoring Reports ........................................................................................................ 28 SECTION 7.0 – COMPLETION OF COMPENSATORY MITIGATION ......................................................... 30 SECTION 8.0 – CONTINGENCY MEASURES FOR COMPENSATORY MITIGATION ................................... 31 8.1 INITIATING CONTINGENCY PROCEDURES ................................................................................... 31 8.2 ALTERNATIVE LOCATIONS FOR CONTINGENCY COMPENSATORY MITIGATION ........................ 31 8.3 FUNDING ..................................................................................................................................... 31 SECTION 9.0 – REFERENCES .............................................................................................................. 32 Chambers Group, Inc. iii 21206 Valley Center Storage Project Conceptual Revegetation Plan Valley Center, San Diego County, CA LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1: Direct Impacts by Vegetation Type ................................................................................................. 4 Table 2: Responsible Parties ......................................................................................................................... 7 Table 3: Estimates of Project Disturbance to Vegetation Communities within each Gen-tie Alignment Option ........................................................................................................................................................... 8 Table 4: Estimated Cost Summary for Revegetation/Restoration Activities .............................................. 11 Table 4: Seed Mix .......................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Redalyc.Géneros De Lamiaceae De México, Diversidad Y Endemismo
    Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad ISSN: 1870-3453 [email protected] Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México México Martínez-Gordillo, Martha; Fragoso-Martínez, Itzi; García-Peña, María del Rosario; Montiel, Oscar Géneros de Lamiaceae de México, diversidad y endemismo Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, vol. 84, núm. 1, marzo, 2013, pp. 30-86 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Distrito Federal, México Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=42526150034 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 84: 30-86, 2013 DOI: 10.7550/rmb.30158 Géneros de Lamiaceae de México, diversidad y endemismo Genera of Lamiaceae from Mexico, diversity and endemism Martha Martínez-Gordillo1, Itzi Fragoso-Martínez1, María del Rosario García-Peña2 y Oscar Montiel1 1Herbario de la Facultad de Ciencias, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. partado postal 70-399, 04510 México, D.F., México. 2Herbario Nacional de México, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Apartado postal 70-367, 04510 México, D.F., México. [email protected] Resumen. La familia Lamiaceae es muy diversa en México y se distribuye con preferencia en las zonas templadas, aunque es posible encontrar géneros como Hyptis y Asterohyptis, que habitan en zonas secas y calientes; es una de las familias más diversas en el país, de la cual no se tenían datos actualizados sobre su diversidad y endemismo.
    [Show full text]
  • Palynological Evolutionary Trends Within the Tribe Mentheae with Special Emphasis on Subtribe Menthinae (Nepetoideae: Lamiaceae)
    Plant Syst Evol (2008) 275:93–108 DOI 10.1007/s00606-008-0042-y ORIGINAL ARTICLE Palynological evolutionary trends within the tribe Mentheae with special emphasis on subtribe Menthinae (Nepetoideae: Lamiaceae) Hye-Kyoung Moon Æ Stefan Vinckier Æ Erik Smets Æ Suzy Huysmans Received: 13 December 2007 / Accepted: 28 March 2008 / Published online: 10 September 2008 Ó Springer-Verlag 2008 Abstract The pollen morphology of subtribe Menthinae Keywords Bireticulum Á Mentheae Á Menthinae Á sensu Harley et al. [In: The families and genera of vascular Nepetoideae Á Palynology Á Phylogeny Á plants VII. Flowering plantsÁdicotyledons: Lamiales (except Exine ornamentation Acanthaceae including Avicenniaceae). Springer, Berlin, pp 167–275, 2004] and two genera of uncertain subtribal affinities (Heterolamium and Melissa) are documented in Introduction order to complete our palynological overview of the tribe Mentheae. Menthinae pollen is small to medium in size The pollen morphology of Lamiaceae has proven to be (13–43 lm), oblate to prolate in shape and mostly hexacol- systematically valuable since Erdtman (1945) used the pate (sometimes pentacolpate). Perforate, microreticulate or number of nuclei and the aperture number to divide the bireticulate exine ornamentation types were observed. The family into two subfamilies (i.e. Lamioideae: bi-nucleate exine ornamentation of Menthinae is systematically highly and tricolpate pollen, Nepetoideae: tri-nucleate and hexa- informative particularly at generic level. The exine stratifi- colpate pollen). While the
    [Show full text]
  • The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California, Second Edition Supplement II December 2014
    The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California, Second Edition Supplement II December 2014 In the pages that follow are treatments that have been revised since the publication of the Jepson eFlora, Revision 1 (July 2013). The information in these revisions is intended to supersede that in the second edition of The Jepson Manual (2012). The revised treatments, as well as errata and other small changes not noted here, are included in the Jepson eFlora (http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/IJM.html). For a list of errata and small changes in treatments that are not included here, please see: http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/JM12_errata.html Citation for the entire Jepson eFlora: Jepson Flora Project (eds.) [year] Jepson eFlora, http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/IJM.html [accessed on month, day, year] Citation for an individual treatment in this supplement: [Author of taxon treatment] 2014. [Taxon name], Revision 2, in Jepson Flora Project (eds.) Jepson eFlora, [URL for treatment]. Accessed on [month, day, year]. Copyright © 2014 Regents of the University of California Supplement II, Page 1 Summary of changes made in Revision 2 of the Jepson eFlora, December 2014 PTERIDACEAE *Pteridaceae key to genera: All of the CA members of Cheilanthes transferred to Myriopteris *Cheilanthes: Cheilanthes clevelandii D. C. Eaton changed to Myriopteris clevelandii (D. C. Eaton) Grusz & Windham, as native Cheilanthes cooperae D. C. Eaton changed to Myriopteris cooperae (D. C. Eaton) Grusz & Windham, as native Cheilanthes covillei Maxon changed to Myriopteris covillei (Maxon) Á. Löve & D. Löve, as native Cheilanthes feei T. Moore changed to Myriopteris gracilis Fée, as native Cheilanthes gracillima D.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf Clickbook Booklet
    299 Jun Juncus mexicanus Mexican rush 99 300 Jun Juncus oxymeris pointed rush 1? PCT B3 Warner Springs north 301 Jun Juncus tiehmii Tiehm's rush V # Fam Scientific Name (*)Common Name #Pls 302 Lil Calochortus concolor golden-bowl mariposa sp6 Lycophytes 303 Lil Calochortus invenustus plain mariposa lily V 1 Sel Selaginella bigelovii Bigelow's spike-moss 99 304 Lil Calochortus palmeri var. munzii Munz's mariposa lily 2 Ferns 305 Lil Lilium humboldtii ssp. ocellatum ocellated Humboldt lily 50 2 Dry Dryopteris arguta California wood fern V 306 Poa Agrostis exarata spike bentgrass V 3 Equ Equisetum Xferrissii Ferris' horsetail 5? 307 Poa Agrostis scabra rough bentgrass V 4 Pte Cheilanthes clevelandii scaly lipfern 99 308 Poa Aristida purpurea purple three-awn 3 5 Pte Cheilanthes covillei beady lipfern 4 309 Poa Aristida ternipes var. gentilis hook three-awn 10 6 Pte Pellaea andromedifolia coffee fern 99 310 Poa Avena barbata *slender wild oats 5 7 Pte Pellaea mucronata var. mucronata bird's-foot fern 99 311 Poa Bouteloua barbata var. barbata six-weeks grama 25 8 Pte Pentagramma triangularis ssp. triangularis goldback fern 2 312 Poa Bromus carinatus var. carinatus California brome V 9 Woo Cystopteris fragilis brittle bladder fern V 313 Poa Bromus diandrus *ripgut brome 30 Gymnosperms 314 Poa Bromus madritensis ssp. rubens *red brome 99 10 Pin Pinus coulteri Coulter pine 20 315 Poa Bromus tectorum *downy brome 99 Magnoliids 316 Poa Cynodon dactylon *Bermuda grass 3 11 Sau Anemopsis californica yerba mansa x 317 Poa Elymus condensatus giant wild-rye 99 Eudicots 318 Poa Elymus glaucus blue wildrye 40 12 Ado Sambucus nigra ssp.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX D Biological Technical Report
    APPENDIX D Biological Technical Report CarMax Auto Superstore EIR BIOLOGICAL TECHNICAL REPORT PROPOSED CARMAX AUTO SUPERSTORE PROJECT CITY OF OCEANSIDE, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: EnviroApplications, Inc. 2831 Camino del Rio South, Suite 214 San Diego, California 92108 Contact: Megan Hill 619-291-3636 Prepared by: 4629 Cass Street, #192 San Diego, California 92109 Contact: Melissa Busby 858-334-9507 September 29, 2020 Revised March 23, 2021 Biological Technical Report CarMax Auto Superstore TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 3 SECTION 1.0 – INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 6 1.1 Proposed Project Location .................................................................................... 6 1.2 Proposed Project Description ............................................................................... 6 SECTION 2.0 – METHODS AND SURVEY LIMITATIONS ............................................ 8 2.1 Background Research .......................................................................................... 8 2.2 General Biological Resources Survey .................................................................. 8 2.3 Jurisdictional Delineation ...................................................................................... 9 2.3.1 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Jurisdiction .................................................... 9 2.3.2 Regional Water Quality
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Understanding The
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Understanding the Effects of Floral Density on Flower Visitation Rates and Species Composition of Flower Visitors A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Evolution, Ecology and Organismal Biology by Carla Jean Essenberg June 2012 Dissertation Committee: Dr. John T. Rotenberry, Chairperson Dr. Kurt E. Anderson Dr. Richard A. Redak Copyright by Carla Jean Essenberg 2012 The Dissertation of Carla Jean Essenberg is approved: _________________________________________________ _________________________________________________ _________________________________________________ Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside Acknowledgements I thank my advisor, John Rotenberry, and my committee members Kurt Anderson and Rick Redak for advice provided throughout the development and writing of my dissertation. I am grateful to Sarah Schmits, Jennifer Howard, Matthew Poonamallee, Emily Bergmann, and Susan Bury for their assistance in collecting field data. Margaret Essenberg, Nick Waser, and five anonymous reviewers provided helpful comments on individual chapters of this dissertation. I also thank Paul Aigner, Doug Yanega, the Univ. of California-Riverside Biology Department Lab Prep staff, Dmitry Maslov, Barbara Walter, Morris and Gina Maduro, Ed Platzer, Rhett Woerly, and the Univ. of Califorina- Riverside Entomology Research Museum for providing advice, equipment, and/or assistance with logistical challenges encountered during data collection. All field data were collected at the UC-Davis Donald and Sylvia McLaughlin Natural Reserve. The work was supported by a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship, a Mildred E. Mathias Graduate Student Research Grant from the Univ. of California Natural Reserve System, and funding from the University of California- Riverside. The material in Chapter 1 was accepted for publication in the American Naturalist on March 26, 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • References and Appendices
    References Ainley, D.G., S.G. Allen, and L.B. Spear. 1995. Off- Arnold, R.A. 1983. Ecological studies on six endan- shore occurrence patterns of marbled murrelets gered butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae): in central California. In: C.J. Ralph, G.L. Hunt island biogeography, patch dynamics, and the Jr., M.G. Raphael, and J.F. Piatt, technical edi- design of habitat preserves. University of Cali- tors. Ecology and Conservation of the Marbled fornia Publications in Entomology 99: 1–161. Murrelet. USDA Forest Service, General Techni- Atwood, J.L. 1993. California gnatcatchers and coastal cal Report PSW-152; 361–369. sage scrub: the biological basis for endangered Allen, C.R., R.S. Lutz, S. Demairais. 1995. Red im- species listing. In: J.E. Keeley, editor. Interface ported fire ant impacts on Northern Bobwhite between ecology and land development in Cali- populations. Ecological Applications 5: 632-638. fornia. Southern California Academy of Sciences, Allen, E.B., P.E. Padgett, A. Bytnerowicz, and R.A. Los Angeles; 149–169. Minnich. 1999. Nitrogen deposition effects on Atwood, J.L., P. Bloom, D. Murphy, R. Fisher, T. Scott, coastal sage vegetation of southern California. In T. Smith, R. Wills, P. Zedler. 1996. Principles of A. Bytnerowicz, M.J. Arbaugh, and S. Schilling, reserve design and species conservation for the tech. coords. Proceedings of the international sym- southern Orange County NCCP (Draft of Oc- posium on air pollution and climate change effects tober 21, 1996). Unpublished manuscript. on forest ecosystems, February 5–9, 1996, River- Austin, M. 1903. The Land of Little Rain. University side, CA.
    [Show full text]
  • SAN DIEGO COUNTY NATIVE PLANTS in the 1830S
    SAN DIEGO COUNTY NATIVE PLANTS IN THE 1830s The Collections of Thomas Coulter, Thomas Nuttall, and H.M.S. Sulphur with George Barclay and Richard Hinds James Lightner San Diego Flora San Diego, California 2013 SAN DIEGO COUNTY NATIVE PLANTS IN THE 1830s Preface The Collections of Thomas Coulter, Thomas Nuttall, and Our knowledge of the natural environment of the San Diego region H.M.S. Sulphur with George Barclay and Richard Hinds in the first half of the 19th century is understandably vague. Referenc- es in historical sources are limited and anecdotal. As prosperity peaked Copyright © 2013 James Lightner around 1830, probably no more than 200 inhabitants in the region could read and write. At most one or two were trained in natural sciences or All rights reserved medicine. The best insights we have into the landscape come from nar- No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form ratives of travelers and the periodic reports of the missions’ lands. They without permission in writing from the publisher. provide some idea of the extent of agriculture and the general vegeta- tion covering surrounding land. ISBN: 978-0-9749981-4-5 The stories of the visits of United Kingdom naturalists who came in Library of Congress Control Number: 2013907489 the 1830s illuminate the subject. They were educated men who came to the territory intentionally to examine the flora. They took notes and col- Cover photograph: lected specimens as botanists do today. Reviewing their contributions Matilija Poppy (Romneya trichocalyx), Barrett Lake, San Diego County now, we can imagine what they saw as they discovered plants we know.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B Biological Resources Analysis
    Appendix B Biological Resources Analysis INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 38 NORTH MARENGO AVENUE PASADENA. CALIFORNIA 91101 T 626.204.9800 F 626.204.9834 MEMORANDUM From: Michael Cady – Senior Biologist Subject: Biological Resources Analysis for the Buena Vista Project Date: August 18, 2020 Attachment(s): A) Photo Exhibit; B) Google Earth Imagery of the Project Site; C) Plant Compendium; D) Wildlife Compendium; E) Sensitive Resources Databases Query Results; F) Historic California Natural Diversity Database Records; G) Special-Status Plant Species Potential to Occur; H) Special-Status Wildlife Species Potential to Occur; I) Historical Aerial Imagery of the Project Site from 1948; J) National Wetlands Inventory Results; K) Wildlife Corridors and Habitat Connectivity Exhibit; L) California Natural Community Conservation Plans This memorandum (memo) details the methodology and results of Dudek’s site visit and analysis for the potential occurrence of sensitive resources within the proposed Buena Vista Project (project). The Project site is located at 1030–1380 North Broadway and 1251 North Spring Street, within the vicinity of the Chinatown neighborhood, downtown Los Angeles, Lincoln Heights, and Dodger Stadium/Elysian Park. The analysis was conducted in support of the Initial Study (IS) for the project to determine if additional studies or analysis are necessary. Methodology A review of existing information and a site visit was conducted to determine the biological resources that are present or have potential to occur on and adjacent to the project site. Literature Review A literature review was conducted prior to the field visit to identify special-status biological resources present or potentially present within the vicinity of the project site using the following: • California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) (CDFW 2020a) • California Native Plant Society’s (CNPS) Online Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants (CNPS 2020) • U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Baja California, Mexico, and a Vegetation Map of Colonet Mesa Alan B
    Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 29 | Issue 1 Article 4 2011 Plants of the Colonet Region, Baja California, Mexico, and a Vegetation Map of Colonet Mesa Alan B. Harper Terra Peninsular, Coronado, California Sula Vanderplank Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, Claremont, California Mark Dodero Recon Environmental Inc., San Diego, California Sergio Mata Terra Peninsular, Coronado, California Jorge Ochoa Long Beach City College, Long Beach, California Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Botany Commons, and the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Harper, Alan B.; Vanderplank, Sula; Dodero, Mark; Mata, Sergio; and Ochoa, Jorge (2011) "Plants of the Colonet Region, Baja California, Mexico, and a Vegetation Map of Colonet Mesa," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 29: Iss. 1, Article 4. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol29/iss1/4 Aliso, 29(1), pp. 25–42 ’ 2011, Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden PLANTS OF THE COLONET REGION, BAJA CALIFORNIA, MEXICO, AND A VEGETATION MAPOF COLONET MESA ALAN B. HARPER,1 SULA VANDERPLANK,2 MARK DODERO,3 SERGIO MATA,1 AND JORGE OCHOA4 1Terra Peninsular, A.C., PMB 189003, Suite 88, Coronado, California 92178, USA ([email protected]); 2Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, 1500 North College Avenue, Claremont, California 91711, USA; 3Recon Environmental Inc., 1927 Fifth Avenue, San Diego, California 92101, USA; 4Long Beach City College, 1305 East Pacific Coast Highway, Long Beach, California 90806, USA ABSTRACT The Colonet region is located at the southern end of the California Floristic Province, in an area known to have the highest plant diversity in Baja California.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenies and Secondary Chemistry in Arnica (Asteraceae)
    Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology 392 Phylogenies and Secondary Chemistry in Arnica (Asteraceae) CATARINA EKENÄS ACTA UNIVERSITATIS UPSALIENSIS ISSN 1651-6214 UPPSALA ISBN 978-91-554-7092-0 2008 urn:nbn:se:uu:diva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ist of Papers This thesis is based on the following papers, which are referred to in the text by their Roman numerals: I Ekenäs, C., B. G. Baldwin, and K. Andreasen. 2007. A molecular phylogenetic
    [Show full text]
  • Trees, Shrubs, and Perennials That Intrigue Me (Gymnosperms First
    Big-picture, evolutionary view of trees and shrubs (and a few of my favorite herbaceous perennials), ver. 2007-11-04 Descriptions of the trees and shrubs taken (stolen!!!) from online sources, from my own observations in and around Greenwood Lake, NY, and from these books: • Dirr’s Hardy Trees and Shrubs, Michael A. Dirr, Timber Press, © 1997 • Trees of North America (Golden field guide), C. Frank Brockman, St. Martin’s Press, © 2001 • Smithsonian Handbooks, Trees, Allen J. Coombes, Dorling Kindersley, © 2002 • Native Trees for North American Landscapes, Guy Sternberg with Jim Wilson, Timber Press, © 2004 • Complete Trees, Shrubs, and Hedges, Jacqueline Hériteau, © 2006 They are generally listed from most ancient to most recently evolved. (I’m not sure if this is true for the rosids and asterids, starting on page 30. I just listed them in the same order as Angiosperm Phylogeny Group II.) This document started out as my personal landscaping plan and morphed into something almost unwieldy and phantasmagorical. Key to symbols and colored text: Checkboxes indicate species and/or cultivars that I want. Checkmarks indicate those that I have (or that one of my neighbors has). Text in blue indicates shrub or hedge. (Unfinished task – there is no text in blue other than this text right here.) Text in red indicates that the species or cultivar is undesirable: • Out of range climatically (either wrong zone, or won’t do well because of differences in moisture or seasons, even though it is in the “right” zone). • Will grow too tall or wide and simply won’t fit well on my property.
    [Show full text]