Trong Số Này Nguyeät San Thường Xuyên Diễn Đàn Giáo Dân Thư Tòa Soạn

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Trong Số Này Nguyeät San Thường Xuyên Diễn Đàn Giáo Dân Thư Tòa Soạn Soá 228 - Thaùng 11/2020 Trong Số Này Nguyeät San Thường Xuyên Diễn Đàn Giáo Dân Thư Tòa Soạn ................................................................................................ DĐGD 2 Dien Dan Giao Dan, Inc. Hộp Thư Độc Giả ......................................................................................................................DĐGD 4 Non-Profit Organization #2455155 Chủ Đề P.O. BOX 10250 • Lễ Phong Chân Phước Cho Thiên Tài Tin Học Tuổi Teen Carlo Acutis ...................................Hồng Thủy 07 Westminster, CA 92685, USA • Ngừơi Tín Hữu Giáo Dân Nên Thánh ................................................................................ Jb Trần Văn Cảo 09 714-894-5826 • Bài Việt - Sử Học Lại ............................................................................................................ Phạm Minh-Tâm 24 Website: www.DienDanGiaoDan.com • “Nhóm Chống Tt Diệm” Roger Hilsman, Cabot Lodge Email: [email protected] Đã Hành Động Qua Mặt TT Kennedy ..............................................................................Nguyễn Anh Tuấn 28 • Đệ Nhất Việt-Nam Cộng-Hòa ...................................................................................................Nguyễn Nhơn 35 Linh Hướng • Viết Từ Canada: Chính Sách Của Hoa Kỳ Đối Với Việt Nam LM Phanxicô Xaviê Ngô Tôn Huấn Có Thay Đổi Gì Với Ông Trump Hay Ông Biden? ...................................................................... Mặc Giao 39 Cố Vấn Pháp Luật • Thế Giới Sẽ Đến Điểm ‘Không Thể Quay Trở Lại’? .........................................................Phạm Phú Khải 45 • Tôi Đọc: Đặc San 2020 Ngày Giỗ Năm Thứ 57 L.S. Trần Đình Định Cố Tổng Thống Ngô Đình Diệm ........................................................................................Nguyễn Thị Ngọc 86 Nhóm Chủ Trương • 130 Người Chết, Hơn 200.000 Người Sơ Tán Vì Lũ Lụt ........................................Tất Định - Gia Chính 104 Nguyeãn Xuaân Haân, Leâ Tinh Thoâng, • Hát Trên Những Xác Người .............................................................................................................................105 Nguyeãn Vaên Nhueä, Traàn Ngoïc Vaân, Nguyeãn Ñöùc Tuyeân, Nguyeãn Tröôøng Khoan, Kim Loan, Tôn Giáo Traàn Taán Toan, Hoaøng Quyù, Leâ Vaên Trang, • Tóm Tắt Thông Điệp “Fratelli Tutti – Tất Cả Anh Em” ..........................................................Vatican News 13 Traàn Quang Tuyeán, Nguyeãn Khoa Khöông, Nguyeãn Vaên Baùch, Ñinh Löu Nhaõ, Leâ Thieân, • Hội Đồng Giám Mục Việt Nam Thư Gửi Cộng Đồng Dân Chúa ..................................................................22 Nguyeãn Maïnh Thöôøng, Phaïm Taát Hanh, • Giải Đáp Giáo Lý: Linh Mục Có Được Phép Cử Hành Bí Tích Nguyeãn Ñöùc Chuyeân, Laura Traàn, Traàn Vaên Caûo, Theo Ý Riêng Mình Không? ................................................................LM Phanxicô Xaviê Ngô Tôn Huấn 70 Nguyeãn Vaên Quaùt, Nguyễn Văn Liêm, Đinh Thái Sơn, • Tin Mừng Giữa Dòng Đời: Con Nói Thầy Là Ai ............................................................... Trần Việt Cường 74 Trang Đài, Nguyễn Mạnh Chí, Ngô Đình Lượng. • Chân Phước Carlo Acutis1991-2006 * Thiên Tài Tin Học Tuổi Thơ ............................................Lê Thiên 77 Tòa Soạn • Thánh Lễ Tạ Ơn Mừng Thượng Thọ 95 Tuổithầy Stêphanô Nguyễn Khắc Dương ............. Francis Cao 82 Chuû Nhieäm: Thời Sự Nguyễn Văn Liêm • Lượm Lặt Đó Đây .....................................................................................................................Trần Phong Vũ 51 Đinh Thái Sơn, Phụ Tá • Thao Túng Tiền Tệ, Nguy Cơ Với Đầu Tư ......................................................................Trần Nguyên Thao 59 Chuû Buùt: • Nhật Giải Thích Lý Do Thủ Tướng Suga Chọn Việt Nam Là Điểm Đến Đầu Tiên ....................................62 Mặc Giao • Chiến Hạm Nhật Từ Cam Ranh Ra Khơi Biển Đông; Nhật Sẽ Bán Vũ Khí Cho VN ................. Tú Anh 66 Trang Đài, Phụ Tá • Hạt Lúa Mì Trên Đá .............................................................................................................. Phạm Minh-Tâm 80 Toång Thö Kyù: • Thư Của TNS Thomas J. Dodd Gởi Tns James O. Eastland, Charlie Nguyễn Mạnh Chí. Chủ Tịch Uỷ Ban Nội An Thượng Nghị Viện* ................................................................................................87 Joseph Ngô, Phụ Tá • Viết Từ Nước Đức: Câu Chuyện Từ Nước Đức ...............................................................Phạm Hồng -Lam 96 Trị Sự • Thư Của Phạm Đoan Trang Để Lại Trước Khi Đi Tù ...................................................................................107 Nguyeãn Khoa Khöông, Nguyeãn Maïnh Thöôøng, Thông Tin, Văn Hoá, Xã Hội, Linh Tinh Nguyeãn Ñöùc Chuyeân, Nguyeãn Thò Theâu, Ñoã Trí Tueä, • Tháng Cầu Cho Các Linh Hồn Tháng 11 Và Đạo Hiếu .......................................................Trần Mỹ Duyệt 18 Trần Văn Cảo, Nguyễn Văn Quát, Hương Thu, • Từ Vực Sâu Con Kêu Lên.................................................................................Francis Assisi Lê Đình Bảng 21 Trần Quang Tuyến, Phạm Bá Cát, Đỗ Trí Tuệ • Sổ Tay Thường Dân: Nước Việt Nhìn Từ Đất Thái ..........................................................Tưởng Năng Tiến 67 Ban Biên Tập • Thư Của LM Nguyễn Văn Khải Về Việc Cha Bị Nhiễm Covid-19 ..............................................................69 Traàn Phong Vuõ, Nguyeãn Ñöùc Tuyeân, Traàn Höõu Khaéc, • Sầu Thu & Trời Vào Thu........................................................................................................Trần Vệt Cường 76 Nguyeãn Tieán Ích, Leâ Tinh Thoâng, Leâ Thieân, • Nghệ Thuật Vui Sống Tuổi Già - Đối Phó Với Lo Âu Nguyeãn Chính Keát, Thanh Hieàn, Phaïm Minh Taâm, Và Trầm Cảm ........................................................................Anselm Gruen. Người Dịch Phạm Hồng-Lam 93 Ñoã Maïnh Tri, Nguyeãn Tieán Caûnh, Minh Voõ, • Lá Thư Canada: Nhân Dân Đồng Bào ................................................................................................. Trà Lũ 99 Phaïm Hoàng Lam, Trà Lũ Trang Đài Glassey-Trầnguyễn • Thơ Gió Chướng .......................................................................................................................Cuồng Phong 103 • Trang Y Học: Bệnh Gan Nhiễm Mỡ .......................................................................... Bác Sĩ Ngô Đình Tân 110 Trình Bầy • Gia Chánh: Bánh Cake Với Rượu Rhum, Mứt Và Nho ...........................................................Giang Anh 111 Pax Trònh Số 228 Tháng 11 - 2020 website: DienDanGiaoDan.com - 1 Giaù Bieåu Moät Naêm n Hoa Kyø Ñoïc giaû thöôøng: 50MK Ñoïc giaû aân nhaân: 60MK trôû leân n Canada: 70MK n AÂu Chaâu: 80MK n AÙ vaø UÙc Chaâu: 80MK n Caùc Ñaïi Dieän La Puente, CA: Nguyeãn Ñöùc (626) 917-7487 Cách đây 57 năm, Ngày 1-11-1963, cuộc đảo chánh lật đổ TổngThống Los Angeles, CA: Ngô Đình Diệm và chế độ Đệ Nhất Việt Nam Cộng Hòa đã được các tướng Nguyeãn Ngoïc Chaùnh (626) 810-6346 lãnh theo lệnh Mỹ thực hiện. Ngày hôm sau, 2-11, họ hạ sát Tổng Thống Ngô Milpitas, CA: Đình Diệm và bào huynh của ông là Cố Vấn Ngô Đình Nhu một cách dã man Phaïm Vaên Töôøng và hèn hạ trong một xe bọc sắt trên đường từ nhà thờ Cha Tam ở Chợ Lớn đến (408) 946-4027 trụ sở Bộ Tổng Tham Mưu. Cuộc đảo chánh vấy máu này đã mở đưòng cho Riverside, CA: Ñoã Taâm những năm hỗn loạn về chính trị, suy thoái về quân sự, dẫn đến việc tướng (909) 272-3446 Dương Văn Minh đầu hàng cộng sản ngày 30-4-1975. Công tội đã rõ. Hận Traàn Huy Thoáng thù nên quên. Người chính trực yêu nước thương dân được tưởng nhớ và tri (929) 788-4637 ân. Chúng tôi viết và soạn một số bài để ôn lại biến cố bất hạnh đó trong số San Diego, CA: Phaïm Vaên Hoäi báo này. (619) 516-3573 (619) 261-1250 Và kính cẩn tưởng niệm Tổng Thống Ngô Đình Diệm đã vị quốc vong San Jose, CA: Nguyeãn Ñình Sang thân (408) 230-6418 San Francisco/ Oaland, CA: Trở lại với hiện tại. Cuộc bầu cử tổng thống Hoa Kỳ kể như đã xong. Nguyeãn Vaên Hieäp Chúng ta đã biết hay sắp biết ai là người sẽ lãnh đạo nước Mỹ trong bốn năm (510)363-8964 sắp tới. Một năm qua, dư luận đã sôi nổi với những tranh cãi quyết liệt về việc Stockon, CA: ủng hộ ông Trump hay ông Biden. Chúng ta bị cuốn vào cơn lốc tranh cử mà Nguyeãn Anh Quyù (209)952-3914 quên đi số phận của Việt Nam qua kết qủa của cuộc bầu cử tại Hoa Kỳ. Dù Denver, CO: muốn dù không, chính sách toàn cầu của Hoa Kỳ luôn ảnh hưởng tới tình hình Leâ Vaên Giaùo Việt Nam, đặc biệt là cuộc tranh chấp Mỹ-Trung về Biển Đông. Nếu không (303) 761-0072 có sự can thiệp của Mỹ, Biển Đông đã bị Trung Quốc nuốt trửng và Việt Nam Florida: không thể có một khả năng chống kháng nào. Vì vậy, việc ai sẽ lãnh đạo nước Leâ Ngoïc Thanh (561) 249-4201 Mỹ trong bốn năm sắp tới và chính sách đối với Việt Nam của nhà lãnh đạo Georgia: ấy ra sao đương nhiên là mối quan tâm của nhà nước và mọi người Việt Nam. Buøi Mai Quoác Tuaán (770) 507-3247 Hoa Kỳ và cộng sản Việt Nam đã thiết lập bang giao được 25 năm. Trong Indiana: một phần tư thế kỷ đó, Việt Nam được Mỹ đối xử ra sao ai cũng biết. Phải nói Mt. Nguyeãn Ñình Caän là Việt Nam được lợi rất nhiều, được nước Mỹ mở cửa cho vào làm doanh (260) 755-0774 thương, học hỏi, gia nhập các tổ chức quốc tế và được bênh vực trong việc Chicago, IL: Nguyeãn Thoï Khaûi tranh chấp với Trung Quốc về Biển Đông. Mỹ đã mở đường, các quốc gia tự (773) 478-1128 do dân chủ khác cũng mở theo. Điều Mỹ đòi hỏi nơi Việt Nam là tôn trọng Louisville, KY: nhân quyền, và sau này là cùng với các quốc gia trong vùng Thái Bình Dương Nguyeãn Vaên Ñang ủng hộ Mỹ trong cuộc tranh chấp Mỹ-Trung, đặc biệt là Biẻn Đông. Việt Nam (502) 375-0284
Recommended publications
  • Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project THEODORE J. C. HEAVNER Interviewed By: Char
    Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project THEODORE J. C. HEAVNER Interviewed by: Charles Stuart Kennedy Initial interview date: May 28, 1997 Copyright 2 ADST TABLE OF CONTENTS Background Born and raised in Canton, O io Nort western University and (Case) Western Reserve University of Iowa Harvard University U.S. Army - ,orean War Entered Foreign Service - .900 UNESCO .900-.901 Duties State Department - Foreign Service Institute - .902 3ietnamese 4anguage Training Cornell University - Sout east Asia Program .902-.908 Nort versus Sout 3ietnam Saigon, 3ietnam - Political Officer .908-.909 Diem and private armies Relations wit government officials Cinnamon production Ambassador Durbrow 3iet Cong t reat Consular district Duties Ngo Din Can Reporting Cat olic C urc role Diplomatic colleagues Environment 7ontagnards Pleiku 3ietnamese military 1 Tran 3an Don Saigon, 3ietnam - Political Officer .910-.91. 4yndon B. 9o nson visit Ambassador Ale:is 9o nson and Diem ,ennedy;s 3ietnam policy State Department - 3ietnam Working Group .91.-.913 Averell Harriman Counterinsurgency U.S. policy re Nort 3ietnam Strategy options Ot er agency programs Diem regime 3ietnamese loyalties T ieu ,y regime President ,ennedy interest Defoliants Roger Hilsman C ina role State Department - Foreign Service Institute (FSI) .913-.914 Indonesian 4anguage Training 7edan, Indonesia - Consul and Principal Officer .914-.911 Ambassador Howard 9ones Ambassador 7ars all Green Sukarno and communists Anti-U.S. demonstrations Sumatra groups
    [Show full text]
  • The Ascendancy of the Secretary of Defense : Robert S. Mcnamara
    The Ascendancy of the Secretary ofJULY Defense 2013 The Ascendancy of the Secretary of Defense Robert S. McNamara 1961-1963 Special Study 4 Historical Office Office of the Secretary of Defense Cold War Foreign Policy Series • Special Study 4 The Ascendancy of the Secretary of Defense The Ascendancy of the Secretary of Defense Robert S. McNamara 1961-1963 Cover Photo: Secretary Robert S. McNamara, Gen. Maxwell D. Taylor, and President John F. Kennedy at the White House, January 1963 Source: Robert Knudson/John F. Kennedy Library, used with permission. Cover Design: OSD Graphics, Pentagon. Cold War Foreign Policy Series • Special Study 4 The Ascendancy of the Secretary of Defense The Ascendancy of the Secretary of Defense Robert S. McNamara 1961-1963 Special Study 4 Series Editors Erin R. Mahan, Ph.D. Chief Historian, Office of the Secretary of Defense Jeffrey A. Larsen, Ph.D. President, Larsen Consulting Group Historical Office Office of the Secretary of Defense July 2013 ii iii Cold War Foreign Policy Series • Special Study 4 The Ascendancy of the Secretary of Defense Contents This study was reviewed for declassification by the appropriate U.S. Government departments and agencies and cleared for release. The study is an official publication of the Office of the Secretary of Defense, Foreword..........................................vii but inasmuch as the text has not been considered by the Office of the Secretary of Defense, it must be construed as descriptive only and does Executive Summary...................................ix not constitute the official position of OSD on any subject. Restructuring the National Security Council ................2 Portions of this work may be quoted or reprinted without permission, provided that a standard source credit line in included.
    [Show full text]
  • Interview with Roger Hilsman
    Library of Congress Interview with Roger Hilsman Courtesy of the National Archives and Records Service, Lyndon Baines Johnson Library Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project ROGER HILSMAN Interviewed by: Paige E. Mulhollan Initial interview date: May 15, 1969 Q: Let's begin by identifying you, Sir. You're Roger Hilsman, and your last official position with the government was as assistant secretary of state for Far Eastern Affairs which you held until of 1964. Is that correct? HILSMAN: No, March 15th. I actually resigned earlier than that, but the President asked me to stay till March 15th while he got a replacement. Q: And you had been director of the INR [Intelligence and Research]from the beginning of the Kennedy Administration until 1963? HILSMAN: Right. Q: So you served about a year in the Far East post. HILSMAN: Just a little over. Q: Did you know Mr. Johnson at all prior to the time you came intthe Kennedy Administration? Had you ever had any contact? Interview with Roger Hilsman http://www.loc.gov/item/mfdipbib000512 Library of Congress HILSMAN: I had had some indirect contact with him when he was on Capitol Hill. I was chief of the Foreign Affairs Division of the Legislative Reference Service, and then I was deputy director of the Service. And though I didn't know him personally, I had done some things with some of his staff. It was funny about this, because William S. White, you know, Bill White, was a great friend of the President's. And he's a great friend of mine.
    [Show full text]
  • An Nbc News White Paper Vietnam Hindsight Part Ii
    AN NBC NEWS WHITE PAPER VIETNAM HINDSIGHT PART II: THE DEATH OF DIEM BROADCAST: WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 22, 1971 10:00 - 11:00 CREDITS Opening Title: NBC NEWS WHITE PAPER VIETNAM HINDSIGHT PART II: DEATH OF DIEM Credits: NBC NEWS WHITE PAPER VIETNAM HINDSIGHT Copyright c The National Broadcasting Co., Inc. 1971 All Rights Reserved Produced and Written By FRED FREED Directed by PAMELA HILL Associate Producers ALVIN DAVIS PAMELA HILL Researcher HELEN WHITNEY Production Assistant BARBARA SPENCE Film Researcher JACK GOELMAN Unit Manager KLAUS HEYS Supervising Film Editor DARROLD MURRAY Film Editors MARY ANN MARTIN STUART M. ROSENBERG DAVID J. SAUL JEAN BAGLEY Cameramen STEVE PETROPOULOS WILLIAM RICHARDS Sound JAMES ZOLTOWSKI JOSE VALLE JOHN SINGLETON JEROME GOLD HENRY ROSSEAU IRVING GANS SHELLY FIELMAN Still Pictures by JACQUES LOWE BLACK STAR MAGNUM GEORGES TAMES - THE NEW YORK TIMES THE JOHN F. KENNEDY LIBRARY YOICHI CKOMOTO HORST ?HAAS PEOPLE WHO WERE INTERVIEWED FOR VIETNAM HINDSIGHT IN ORDER OF THEIR APPEARANCE AND POSITION HELD AT THE TIME GEORGE BALL Under-Secretary of State 1961-1966 MAXWELL TAYLOR- Military Adviser to JFK 1961 Chairman of the Joint Chiefs 1962- 64 JOHN KENNETH GALBRAITH Ambassador to India 1961-63 DAVID HALBERSTAM Correspondent - New York Times - Vietnam 1962-63 WALT M. ROSTOW Deputy Special Assistant to the President for National Security 1961-64 MME. NHU Wife of Ngo Dinh Nhu, sister-in-law of Ngo Dinh Diem ARTHUR SCHLESINGER Special Assistant to the President 1961-64 PAUL HARKINS US Military Commander - Vietnam 1962-64 • JOHN VANN American Military Adviser in Vietnam MICHAEL FORRESTAL Senior Member - White House National Security Staff 1962-66 ROGER HILSMAN Assistant Secretary of State for Far Eastern Affairs 1963-64 ■ RUFUS PHILLIPS American AID Mission - Vietnam -2- FREDERICK NOLTING U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Courtesy of the National Archives and Records Service Lyndon Baines Johnson Library Association for Diplomatic Studies and Train
    Courtesy of the National Archives and Records Service Lyndon Baines Johnson Library Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training oreign Affairs Oral History Pro$ect RUFUS PHILLIPS Interviewed by: Ted Gittinger Initial interview date: March 4, 1982 TABLE OF CONTENTS Background University of Virginia Law School Served briefly with CIA US Army, Korean ,ar, Vietnam ,ar Vietnam ,ar 1.5011.52 Saigon 3ilitary 3ission North Vietnamese Catholics Colonel Lansdale Use of rench language Joe Ban4on Soc Trang Province Hanh Diem 3agsaysay Ambassador 5eneral Lawton Collins 6retired7 Liaison Officer Ca 3au operation Operation Brotherhood ilipinos Reoccupation of 8one 5 rench Operation Atlante 5eneral 3ike O9Daniel Colonel Kim Training Relations Instruction 3ission 6TRI37 Viet 3inh evacuation rench1Diem relations Resentment of Viet 3inh 3AA5 Binh :uyen Central Intelligence Agency 6CIA7 1 Vietnamese psywar school Setting up 515 staff Kieu Cong Cung Civil Action Pro$ect AID 3ission Re1organi4ation of Vietnamese army Viet 3inh preparations for resurgence in South Pre1Ho Chi 3inh Trail Civil 5uard Colonel Lansdale Tran Trung Dung 3ontagnards Destabili4ing Viet 3inh regime Almanac incidents Bui An Tuan Vietnam ;uoc Dan Dang 6VN;DD7 Truong Chinh Political Program for Vietnam 5eneral O1Daniel Ambassador Collins/CIA relations Land Reform ,olf Lade$isky Saigon racketeering operations rench anti1US operations Saigon bombing US facilities Howie Simpson Bay Vien rench 5eneral Ely Trinh 3inh Thé Vietnamese/ rench relations Romaine De osse rench deal with Ho Chi
    [Show full text]
  • John F. Kennedy, W. Averell Harriman, and the Neutralization of Laos, 1961-1962 Edmund F
    Eastern Illinois University The Keep Faculty Research & Creative Activity History August 1998 'A Good, Bad Deal': John F. Kennedy, W. Averell Harriman, and the Neutralization of Laos, 1961-1962 Edmund F. Wehrle Eastern Illinois University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://thekeep.eiu.edu/history_fac Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Wehrle, Edmund F., "'A Good, Bad Deal': John F. Kennedy, W. Averell Harriman, and the Neutralization of Laos, 1961-1962" (1998). Faculty Research & Creative Activity. 38. http://thekeep.eiu.edu/history_fac/38 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the History at The Keep. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Research & Creative Activity by an authorized administrator of The Keep. For more information, please contact [email protected]. '~Good, Bad Deal": John F. Kennedy, W. Averell Harriman, and the Neutralization of Laos, 1961-1962 EDMUND F. WEHRLE The author is a member of the adjunct faculty in the history department in the University ofMaryland, College Park. Historians have devoted considerable attention to John F. Kennedy's Southeast Asian diplomacy. Yet the vast majority of these studies have focused narrowly on Vietnam when, in fact, it was Laos to which the president devoted the bulk of his atten­ tion during his first two years in office.1 In Laos, Kennedy faced a precarious situation, strikingly similar to the crisis soon to arise in Vietnam. Defying many of his advisers and risking political peril, Kennedy decided to pursue the formation of a neutral 1. On Kennedy's priorities in office, see The Pentagon Papers: The Defense Department Histury of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cuban Missile Crisis: Trading the Jupiters in Turkey? Author(S): Barton J
    The Cuban Missile Crisis: Trading the Jupiters in Turkey? Author(s): Barton J. Bernstein Source: Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 95, No. 1 (Spring, 1980), pp. 97-125 Published by: The Academy of Political Science Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2149587 Accessed: 10-10-2016 11:05 UTC REFERENCES Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2149587?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms The Academy of Political Science, Wiley are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Political Science Quarterly This content downloaded from 95.183.180.42 on Mon, 10 Oct 2016 11:05:51 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms The Cuban Missile Crisis: Trading the Jupiters in Turkey? BARTON J. BERNSTEIN President John F. Kennedy has been variously praised and blamed for his handling of, the Cuban missile crisis in October 1962. For most, it was his great triumph: seven days of wide-ranging deliberations and careful planning; and six days of the shrewd use of cautious threats, limited force,- and wise diplomacy to achieve victory.1 For critics, however, it was an unnecessary crisis, or dangerously mishandled, or both: Kennedy should either have acceded to the Soviet missiles in Cuba, or at least tried private diplomacy before moving to the quarantine.
    [Show full text]
  • Vietnam January-August 1963
    VIETNAM I. REASSESSMENT, JANUARY l-MARCH 14: HILSMAN-FORRESTAL REPORT, WHEELER MISSION, MANSFIELD REPORT, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, THOMPSON REPORT ’ 1. Editorial Note On January 2, 1963, regular army and civil guard forces of the Republic of Vietnam engaged a Viet Cong battalion at the village of Ap Bat in Dinh Tuong province, 35 miles southwest of Saigon in the Mekong Delta. The South Vietnamese forces enjoyed a 4-l numerical advantage in the battle, and, unlike the Viet Cong, were supported by artillery, armor, and helicopters. Despite the disparity of numbers and weapons, the Viet Cong battalion inflicted heavy casualties on the government forces and escaped with minor losses. Three American advisers were killed in the fighting and five helicopters were shot down. The United States Army Command in the Pacific reported the battle to the Joint Chiefs of Staff as “one of the bloodiest and costliest battles of S. Vietnam war” and noted that the battle “will provide enemy with morale-building victory”. (Summary telegram 677 from ARPAC to JCS, January 4; Kennedy Library, National Security Files, Vietnam Country Series, l/63) Lieutenant Colonel John l? Vann, se- nior United States adviser to the Seventh Division of the Army of the Republic of Vietnam, filed an after-action report on the Ap Bat opera- tion which concluded that the operation was a failure. Vann attributed the failure to the poor state of training of the South Vietnamese units, a system of command which never placed a Vietnamese officer above the rank of captain on the battlefield, a reluctance to incur casualties, an inability to take effective advantage of air superiority, and a lack of discipline in battle.
    [Show full text]
  • Tragedy Or Choice in Vietnam? Learning to Think Outside The
    Tragedy or Choice in John Garofano Vietnam? Learning to Think Outside the Archival Box A Review Essay Lawrence Freedman, Kennedy’s Wars: Berlin, Cuba, Laos, and Vietnam. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000. David Kaiser, American Tragedy: Kennedy, Johnson, and the Origins ofthe Vietnam War. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2000. Fredrik Logevall, Choosing War: The Lost Chance for Peace and the Escalation of War in Vietnam. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999. In 1965, the United States launched a major air and ground war on behalf of a weak ally against an experienced and committed enemy. Policymakers understood that domestic support would not last forever and would likely decrease as casualties mounted. War games and simulations had suggested that Washington might end up isolated internationally. Yet the nation embarked on a war that reduced U.S. power and prestige, claimed the lives of some 58,000 of its citizens, and led to a skepticism of limited war that still shapes civil-military relations and foreignTragedy or Choice in Vietnam? policy today. Given the risks and uncertainties, why did the United States go to war in Vietnam? After three decades there still is no consensus on this or any number of other basic questions regarding U.S. policy. The exchanges that followed U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara’s conditional apologia in 1995 demonstrated that neither a central architect nor his critics could agree on 1 whether the war was inevitable or winnable. In 2001, on the thirtieth anniver- John Garofano is a Senior Fellow in the International Security Program at the Robert and Renée Belfer Cen- ter for Science and International Affairs, John F.
    [Show full text]
  • Private Business to Public Service: Robert Mcnamara's Management Techniques and Their Limits in Peace And
    Private Business to Public Service: Robert McNamara’s Management Techniques and Their Limits in Peace and War by Albert J. Beveridge A dissertation submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland May, 2014 © 2014 Albert J. Beveridge All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT This dissertation evaluates Robert S. McNamara’s management practices during his tenure as Secretary of Defense, concluding that over- centralized decision-making proved to be the central feature of his management style with one significant exception. When it came to war, notably the Vietnam War, he undermanaged important aspects of that conflict. To better understand McNamara’s management decisions, this dissertation sets them in the context of his brilliance as a student in college and later in graduate school where he absorbed the technocratic management techniques then developing at the Harvard Business School. He applied his education successfully in the Army Air Force during World War II and later at the Ford Motor Company. As Secretary of Defense he initiated a rigorous analytic approach to the defense budget and weapons acquisition through the Planning- Programming-Budgeting System (PPBS) he installed and the associated discipline of systems analysis that he brought to the department. Yet those innovations had the perverse effect of encouraging his proclivity to concentrate on managing data rather than managing people. Through costly errors such as the TFX plane controversy, McNamara discovered the limits ii of technocratic business procedures in a public service environment which required a politically sensitive and socially adept approach. McNamara disregarded many contemporary managerial techniques and models which emphasized delegation, flexibility, and informal communication.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning Mcnamara's <I>Lessons</I>
    Case Western Reserve Law Review Volume 47 Issue 4 Article 7 1997 Learning McNamara's Lessons: How the War Powers Resolution Advances the Rule of Law Peter M. Shane Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Peter M. Shane, Learning McNamara's Lessons: How the War Powers Resolution Advances the Rule of Law, 47 Case W. Rsrv. L. Rev. 1281 (1997) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev/vol47/iss4/7 This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Journals at Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Case Western Reserve Law Review by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. LEARNING McNAMARA'S LESSONS: How THE WAR POWERS RESOLUTION ADVANCES THE RULE OF LAW Peter M. Shanet The end of the Cold War has not diminished either political or scholarly interest in the allocation of governmental authority with respect to the use of military force. This is as it should be. Our post-Vietnam military forays into Iran, Lebanon, Grenada, Libya, Panama, Kuwait, Somalia, Haiti, and Bosnia' amply demon- strate the continuing relevance of the debate. If anything, the re- duced likelihood that local and regional military conflicts will erupt into superpower confrontation reduces the disincentive for the Unit- ed States to deploy military force in the pursuit of discreet military and foreign policy objectives. Before the nation multiplies these experiences too many more times, thoughtful citizens ought consid- er the processes by which the government decides how our military forces should be used.
    [Show full text]
  • Hilsman, Roger. from Nuclear Military Strategy to a World Without War: a History and a Proposal
    Document generated on 09/30/2021 9:07 p.m. Journal of Conflict Studies Hilsman, Roger. From Nuclear Military Strategy to a World Without War: A History and a Proposal. Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1999. John Nelson Rickard Volume 21, Number 2, Winter 2001 URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/jcs21_2br10 See table of contents Publisher(s) The University of New Brunswick ISSN 1198-8614 (print) 1715-5673 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this review Rickard, J. N. (2001). Review of [Hilsman, Roger. From Nuclear Military Strategy to a World Without War: A History and a Proposal. Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1999.] Journal of Conflict Studies, 21(2), 170–171. All rights reserved © Centre for Conflict Studies, UNB, 2001 This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/ This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit. Érudit is a non-profit inter-university consortium of the Université de Montréal, Université Laval, and the Université du Québec à Montréal. Its mission is to promote and disseminate research. https://www.erudit.org/en/ Hilsman, Roger. From Nuclear Military Strategy to a World Without War: A History and a Proposal. Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1999. Roger Hilsman has been a professor of Government and International Politics at Columbia University since 1964 but he is most famous for his role in the administration of John F. Kennedy. Hilsman served as Kennedy’s Assistant Secretary of State for Intelligence and Research and Assistant Secretary of State for Far Eastern Affairs.
    [Show full text]