A120 Little Hadham: Inspector's Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Standon Neighbourhood Plan [2MB]
Barwick Standon Bromley Latchford Puckeridge Colliers End Old Hall Green LATEST NEWS Wellpond Green STANDON PARISH NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN Pre-Submission Draft 2016 BARWICK I STANDON I BROMLEY I LATCHFORD I PUCKERIDGE COLLIERS END I OLD HALL GREEN I WELLPOND GREEN SSTTAANNDDOONN •• PPUUCCKKEERRIIDDGGEE •• BBRROOMMLLEEYY •• CCOOLLLLIIEERRSS EENNDD •• LLAATTCCHHFFOORRDD •• BBAARRWWIICCKK •• OOLLDD HHAALLLL GGRREEEENN •• WWEELLLLPPOONNDD GGRREEEENN CONTENTS PREFACE 1. Introduction 4 A NEIGHBOURLY PARISH 2. The Parish of Standon 6 Standon is a neighbourly Parish, and 3. How the Plan was Prepared: An Inclusive Process 12 its Parishioners believe that the obligation on neighbours to behave in Stage 1: Setting Up 12 a neighbourly manner, in their mutual Stage 2: Spring and Summer Consultations 2015 13 interests, also extends equally and Stage 3: Survey 13 Stage 4: Land Allocations 14 still mutually, to those who come Stage 5: Public Meetings 15 proposing development. Stage 6: Drafting of the Plan 16 The physical presence of those Stage 7: Pre-Submission 16 individuals and companies, as 4. Vision and Objectives 17 neighbours, may be transitory, but 5. The Policies 20 the changes they introduce in and around the neighbourhood area, and Context 20 the ramification of those changes, can Environment 22 have a lasting effect on the quality of Housing and Development 26 life of many local residents. Economy and Employment 32 Transport 33 The Parish therefore responds Facilities and Services 37 positively to developers who share 6. Implementation and Monitoring 43 this approach. Introduction 43 Development Management 43 Infrastructure Projects 43 Monitoring and Review 44 A10 Road Access Proposal 44 7. Appendix 45 Housing Development Proposal 2016-2031 45 Standon Conservation Map 46 Puckeridge Conservation Map 47 Colliers End Boundary Map 48 Areas of Beauty Map 49 2 STANDON PARISH NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN STANDON PARISH NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN 3 1. -
HA16 Rivers and Streams London's Rivers and Streams Resource
HA16 Rivers and Streams Definition All free-flowing watercourses above the tidal limit London’s rivers and streams resource The total length of watercourses (not including those with a tidal influence) are provided in table 1a and 1b. These figures are based on catchment areas and do not include all watercourses or small watercourses such as drainage ditches. Table 1a: Catchment area and length of fresh water rivers and streams in SE London Watercourse name Length (km) Catchment area (km2) Hogsmill 9.9 73 Surbiton stream 6.0 Bonesgate stream 5.0 Horton stream 5.3 Greens lane stream 1.8 Ewel court stream 2.7 Hogsmill stream 0.5 Beverley Brook 14.3 64 Kingsmere stream 3.1 Penponds overflow 1.3 Queensmere stream 2.4 Keswick avenue ditch 1.2 Cannizaro park stream 1.7 Coombe Brook 1 Pyl Brook 5.3 East Pyl Brook 3.9 old pyl ditch 0.7 Merton ditch culvert 4.3 Grand drive ditch 0.5 Wandle 26.7 202 Wimbledon park stream 1.6 Railway ditch 1.1 Summerstown ditch 2.2 Graveney/ Norbury brook 9.5 Figgs marsh ditch 3.6 Bunces ditch 1.2 Pickle ditch 0.9 Morden Hall loop 2.5 Beddington corner branch 0.7 Beddington effluent ditch 1.6 Oily ditch 3.9 Cemetery ditch 2.8 Therapia ditch 0.9 Micham road new culvert 2.1 Station farm ditch 0.7 Ravenbourne 17.4 180 Quaggy (kyd Brook) 5.6 Quaggy hither green 1 Grove park ditch 0.5 Milk street ditch 0.3 Ravensbourne honor oak 1.9 Pool river 5.1 Chaffinch Brook 4.4 Spring Brook 1.6 The Beck 7.8 St James stream 2.8 Nursery stream 3.3 Konstamm ditch 0.4 River Cray 12.6 45 River Shuttle 6.4 Wincham Stream 5.6 Marsh Dykes -
East Herts District Plan
East Herts District Plan Strategic March 2017 Land Availability Assessment 1.0 Introduction 1.1 National planning policy requires all Local Planning Authorities to produce a technical study known as the Strategic Land Availability Assessment (SLAA) in order to identify sites with potential for future development. The SLAA has informed work on the District Plan and Neighbourhood Planning. It has also assisted with the identification of future land supply. 1.2 The SLAA is a ‘live’ document in that it should be updated on a regular basis in order to reflect changing circumstances. Therefore, this version of the SLAA presents the most up to date position as at March 2017. 2.0 Methodology 2.1 Paragraphs 019 to 021 of the PPG identify that, when undertaking a SLAA, sites should be considered against three criteria, namely; suitability, availability and achievability. These terms are explained below. Suitability The assessment of suitability takes into account a range of policy constraints. These include environmental and heritage designations, impact on landscape and character, flooding and Green Belt / Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt. Availability A site is considered to be available if there are no legal or ownership issues which would prevent the site coming forward for development. Achievability Achievability is effectively a judgement about the economic viability of a site, and the capacity of the developer to complete the development over a certain period of time. 2.2 Having assessed each site against the three criteria, a conclusion can be reached. If a site is considered to be suitable, available and achievable, then it is regarded as being ‘deliverable’. -
36 Highbridge Street, Waltham Abbey
36 HIGHBRIDGE STREET, WALTHAM ABBEY Flood Risk Assessment and Surface Water Drainage Statement Alcomax (Investments) Ltd SLR Ref: 408-07833-00001 Version No: 5 October 2018 36 Highbridge Street, Waltham Abbey : FRA and SWDS Filename: 181017_408-07833-00001_36HSWA_FRA_v5 SLR Ref No: 408-07833-00001 October 2018 BASIS OF REPORT This document has been prepared by SLR Consulting Limited with reasonable skill, care and diligence, and taking account of the manpower, timescales and resources devoted to it by agreement with Alcomax (Investments) Ltd. (the Client) as part or all of the services it has been appointed by the Client to carry out. It is subject to the terms and conditions of that appointment. SLR shall not be liable for the use of or reliance on any information, advice, recommendations and opinions in this document for any purpose by any person other than the Client. Reliance may be granted to a third party only in the event that SLR and the third party have executed a reliance agreement or collateral warranty. Information reported herein may be based on the interpretation of public domain data collected by SLR, and/or information supplied by the Client and/or its other advisors and associates. These data have been accepted in good faith as being accurate and valid. The copyright and intellectual property in all drawings, reports, specifications, bills of quantities, calculations and other information set out in this report remain vested in SLR unless the terms of appointment state otherwise. This document may contain information of a specialised and/or highly technical nature and the Client is advised to seek clarification on any elements which may be unclear to it. -
Braintree District Council Infrastructure Delivery Plan June 2021 BRAINTREE DISTRICT COUNCIL INFRASTRUCTURE DELIVERY PLAN
BDC/058 Braintree District Council Infrastructure Delivery Plan June 2021 BRAINTREE DISTRICT COUNCIL INFRASTRUCTURE DELIVERY PLAN PREPARED BY: Troy Planning + Design and Navigus Planning TROY PLANNING + DESIGN 41-42 Foley Street, Fitzrovia, London W1W 7TS www.troyplanning.com NAVIGUS PLANNING Truro, Lushington Road, Manningtree, Essex, CO11 1EF, UK www.navigusplanning.co.uk PREPARED ON BEHALF OF: Braintree District Council COPYRIGHT The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Troy Planning + Design (Troy Hayes Planning Limited). Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Troy Planning + Design constitutes an infringement of copyright. LIMITATION This report has been prepared on behalf of and for the exclusive use of Troy Planning + Design’s Client, and is subject to and issued in connection with the provisions of the agreement between Troy Planning + Design and its Client. Troy Planning + Design and Navigus Planning accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for or in respect of any use or reliance upon this report by any third party. Revision Description Issued by: Date Checked 1 Final LI 21.06.21 CB, LI 2 CONTENTS 1. Introduction............................................................................................................................. 5 1.1. Infrastructure Covered in this Plan ............................................................................................... 5 1.2. Purpose of the Report .................................................................................................................. -
Local Plan Respresentations
29 January 2018 bc Local Plan Regulation 19 Representation Planning Policy Team Epping Forest District Council Civic Offices Ben Thomas 323 High Street Epping Essex CM16 4BZ 33 Margaret Street London W1G 0JD T: +44 (0) 20 7499 8644 savills.com Epping Forest District Council Submission Version Local Plan We write on behalf of Crest Nicholson in relation to the site known as the former Pickfield Nursery at Pick Hill, Waltham Abbey (SLAA Reference SR-0161). Flawed / Absent Local Plan site selection process to-date: Pickfield Nursery was submitted to EFDC in response to the Call for Sites consultation in 2008 and has subsequently been promoted through the current Local Plan process since its inception in 2012. EFDC’s July 2012 SLAA referred to Pickfield Nursery as site SR-0161 but incorrectly identified it as a duplicate site with a much larger parcel (SLAA Reference SR-0020). Representations were then submitted in October 2012 highlighting this mistake. However, despite the submission of detailed representations and subsequent regular liaison with EFDC’s officers (including a positive formal pre-application meeting), EFDC’s Site Selection evidence base published in 2016 discounted Pickfield Nursery prior to Stage 1 of the selection process, once again incorrectly considering it as a duplicate site. Pickfield Nursery was finally acknowledged as an individual site in the Local Plan evidence base in the “Sites for consideration following Regulation 18 consultation” list published in July 2017. However, at the time of writing these representations (26th January 2018, one working day before the Pre-Submission consultation deadline) an assessment of these sites has still not been undertaken and Appendix C1 of the Report on Site Selection (December 2017) has not been completed. -
Road Investment Strategy 2: 2020-2025
Road Investment Strategy 2: 2020–2025 March 2020 CORRECTION SLIP Title: Road Investment Strategy 2: 2020-25 Session: 2019-21 ISBN: 978-1-5286-1678-2 Date of laying: 11th March 2020 Correction: Removing duplicate text on the M62 Junctions 20-25 smart motorway Text currently reads: (Page 95) M62 Junctions 20-25 – upgrading the M62 to smart motorway between junction 20 (Rochdale) and junction 25 (Brighouse) across the Pennines. Together with other smart motorways in Lancashire and Yorkshire, this will provide a full smart motorway link between Manchester and Leeds, and between the M1 and the M6. This text should be removed, but the identical text on page 96 remains. Correction: Correcting a heading in the eastern region Heading currently reads: Under Construction Heading should read: Smart motorways subject to stocktake Date of correction: 11th March 2020 Road Investment Strategy 2: 2020 – 2025 Presented to Parliament pursuant to section 3 of the Infrastructure Act 2015 © Crown copyright 2020 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/ open-government-licence/version/3. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications. Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at https://forms.dft.gov.uk/contact-dft-and-agencies/ ISBN 978-1-5286-1678-2 CCS0919077812 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum. Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. -
Evaluating the Risk of Non-Point Source Pollution From
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11(1), 601613, 2007 Evaluating the risk of non-point source pollution from biosolids: integrated modelling of nutrient losses at field and catchment scales www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/11/601/2007 © Author(s) 2007. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License. Evaluating the risk of non-point source pollution from biosolids: integrated modelling of nutrient losses at field and catchment scales P.G. Whitehead1, A.L. Heathwaite2, N.J. Flynn1, A.J. Wade1 and P.F. Quinn3 1Aquatic Environments Research Centre, Department of Geography, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 6AB, UK 2Centre for Sustainable Water Management, Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, UK 3Department of Civil Engineering, University of Newcastle, NewcastleUK Email for corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract A semi-distributed model, INCA, has been developed to determine the fate and distribution of nutrients in terrestrial and aquatic systems. The model simulates nitrogen and phosphorus processes in soils, groundwaters and river systems and can be applied in a semi-distributed manner at a range of scales. In this study, the model has been applied at field to sub-catchment to whole catchment scale to evaluate the behaviour of biosolid-derived losses of P in agricultural systems. It is shown that process-based models such as INCA, applied at a wide range of scales, reproduce field and catchment behaviour satisfactorily. The INCA model can also be used to generate generic information for risk assessment. By adjusting three key variables: biosolid application rates, the hydrological connectivity of the catchment and the initial P-status of the soils within the model, a matrix of P loss rates can be generated to evaluate the behaviour of the model and, hence, of the catchment system. -
170221 05Dc Appendix A
Appendix A Hertfordshire County Council’s oversubscription criteria for secondary and upper community coeducational schools for 2018/19 Section 324 of the Education Act 1996 requires the governing bodies of all maintained schools to admit a child with a statement of special educational needs that names their school. Schools must also admit children with an EHC (Education, Health and Care) Plan that names the school. If there are fewer applications than places available at a school all applicants will be admitted. If there are more applications than places available, the criteria outlined below will be used to prioritise applications. Oversubscription criteria Rule 1: Children looked after and children who were previously looked after, but ceased to be so because they were adopted (or became subject to a child arrangements order or a special guardianship order)*. Rule 2: Medical or Social Children for whom it can be demonstrated that they have a particular medical or social need to go to the school*. A panel of officers will determine whether the evidence provided is sufficiently compelling to meet the requirements for this rule. The evidence must relate specifically to the school applied for under Rule 2 and must clearly demonstrate why it is the only school that can meet the child’s needs. Rule 3: Sibling Children who have a sibling at the school at the time of application, unless the sibling is in the last year of the normal age-range of the school*. Note: the ‘normal age range’ is the designated range for which the school provides, for example Years 7 to 11 in an 11-16 secondary school, Years 7 to 13 in an 11-18 school . -
ESSENTIAL REFERENCE PAPER ‘B’ Enforcement Files Still Open Pre 2015
ESSENTIAL REFERENCE PAPER ‘B’ Enforcement files still open Pre 2015 Reference Date Site Address Nature of Breach Comments Received E/08/0021/A 11/01/2008 Hecc sport Cricket Centre The erection of an unauthorised industrial NOTICE Awaiting compliance with Tharbies Farm style link building and the unauthorised the OpDev and LB Rook End material change of use from agricultural to a enforcement notices. Jan High Wych cricket school 2017 Sawbridgeworth Hertfordshire CM21 0LL E/09/0018/B 15/01/2009 A site in Fore Street Unauthorised alteration works and neglect of a Planning permission Hertford Grade II Listed Building granted for refurbishment. Hertfordshire Continuing to monitor. E/10/0010/A 15/01/2010 Esbies Estate, Station Road, Various unauthorised structures changes of Considering Legal action. Sawbridgeworth, Herts, CM21 9JY use of untidy sites E/10/0010/A10 13/07/2010 Esbies Estate, Plots 26,27,28, Station Operational development without planning NOTICE Considering Legal action. Road, Sawbridgeworth, Herts, CM21 permission the laying of hard surfacing 9JY E/10/0010/A11 13/07/2010 Esbies Estate, Plots 26,27,28, Station Material change of use of the site for the NOTICE Considering Legal action. Road, Sawbridgeworth, Herts, CM21 storage of mobile homes, the parking of motor 9JY vehicles to inlcude lorries, vans and trailers, and the storage of plant and machinery and gas bottles. E/10/0010/A12 13/07/2010 Esbies Estate, Plot 29, Station Road, Without planning permission the laying of hard NOTICE Considering Legal action. Sawbridgeworth, Herts, CM21 9JY srufacing; the construction of a porch structure to the front of a mobile home; and the erection of a light column E/10/0010/A13 13/07/2010 Esbies Estate, Plot 29, Station Road, Without planning permission the siting of NOTICE Considering Legal action. -
HCC Registry Ref: / / REGISTER of DEPOSITS
HCC Registry ref: / / REGISTER OF DEPOSITS - HIGHWAYS ACT 1980* x x - COMMONS ACT 2006* (* tick if applicable or specify N/A) DETAILS OF APPLICATION Date Application received in prescribed form 09/02/17 Date by which any subsequent highways 08/02/37 declaration must be lodged Plan 1 Parcel 1: District Welwyn & Hatfield Parish Hatfield and Essendon Address and postcode of buildings Hatfield Park on each piece of land subject to the Hatfield application to which a postcode has AL9 5NQ been assigned Nearest town/city to above Hatfield OS 6 figure Grid Reference(s) TL 251 085 for a point within the area of the land Parcel 2: District Welwyn & Hatfield Parish Essendon Address and postcode of buildings East of West End Lane on each piece of land subject to the Hatfield application to which a postcode has AL9 6AZ been assigned Nearest town/city to above Hatfield OS 6 figure Grid Reference(s) TL 260 080 for a point within the area of the land Parcel 3: District Welwyn & Hatfield Parish Hatfield Address and postcode of buildings Brewhouse Farm on each piece of land subject to the Wildhill Road application to which a postcode has Hatfield been assigned AL9 6DP Nearest town/city to above Hatfield OS 6 figure Grid Reference(s) TL 257 065 for a point within the area of the land Parcel 4: District Welwyn & Hatfield Parish Essendon Address and postcode of buildings Essendon Hill on each piece of land subject to the Essendon application to which a postcode has Hatfield been assigned AL9 6AQ Nearest town/city to above Hatfield OS 6 figure Grid Reference(s) -
Lodge Farm Little Hadham, Hertfordshire
Lodge Farm Little Hadham, Hertfordshire Lodge Farm Little Hadham, Hertfordshire Much Hadham 1.5 miles, Bishops Stortford 5 miles (London Liverpool Street from 38 mins), M11 (Junction 8) 7.8 miles, Ware 9.5 miles, Stansted Airport 10 miles, Hertford 12.8 miles, Central London 35 miles, Cambridge 29 miles. (Distances and time approximate) A beautiful family house with guest/staff cottage, all-purpose recreation barn and rural views within 35 miles of London. Main House Entrance hall | Drawing room | Sitting room| Dining room | Kitchen / breakfast room| Family room | Utility room | Boot room | Cellar Principal bedroom with en suite bathroom | 5 further bedrooms | 2 bathrooms Cottage Kitchen/breakfast room| Sitting room| 2 bedrooms | Shower room Recreation barn Large all-purpose recreation area | Kitchen Outside Arable field| Woodland with pond | Swimming pool | Tennis court | Lawns | Terraces | Garaging | Outbuildings In all about 11.34 acres Bishop’s Stortford Country Department Bishop’s Stortford Country Department Chequers, 19 North Street 33 Margaret Street 26 North Street 55 Baker Street Bishop’s Stortford London Bishop’s Stortford London CM23 2LD W1G 0JD Herts CM23 2LW W1U 8AN Tel: +44 1279 756 801 Tel: +44 20 7075 2806 Tel: +44 1279 213 343 Tel: +44 20 7861 1114 jgodfrey tmphillips paddy.pritchard-gordon edward.welton @savills.com @savills.com @knightfrank.com @knightfrank.com savills.co.uk knightfrank.co.uk Situation Believed to have been built as a hunting lodge for the Bishop of London, Lodge Farm is in open countryside on the edge of Little Hadham, about 1.5 miles equidistant from Much Hadham and Standon, which provide local amenities such as a village store, post office, pub, primary school, doctor’s surgery, and garage whilst more comprehensive facilities are available in Ware 9 miles, Hertford 13 miles or Bishop’s Stortford 5 miles.