East Herts District Plan

Strategic March 2017 Land Availability Assessment 1.0 Introduction 1.1 National planning policy requires all Local Planning Authorities to produce a technical study known as the Strategic Land Availability Assessment (SLAA) in order to identify sites with potential for future development. The SLAA has informed work on the District Plan and Neighbourhood Planning. It has also assisted with the identification of future land supply.

1.2 The SLAA is a ‘live’ document in that it should be updated on a regular basis in order to reflect changing circumstances. Therefore, this version of the SLAA presents the most up to date position as at March 2017.

2.0 Methodology

2.1 Paragraphs 019 to 021 of the PPG identify that, when undertaking a SLAA, sites should be considered against three criteria, namely; suitability, availability and achievability. These terms are explained below.

Suitability

The assessment of suitability takes into account a range of policy constraints. These include environmental and heritage designations, impact on landscape and character, flooding and Green Belt / Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt.

Availability

A site is considered to be available if there are no legal or ownership issues which would prevent the site coming forward for development.

Achievability

Achievability is effectively a judgement about the economic viability of a site, and the capacity of the developer to complete the development over a certain period of time.

2.2 Having assessed each site against the three criteria, a conclusion can be reached. If a site is considered to be suitable, available and achievable, then it is regarded as being ‘deliverable’. This means that development could commence on site within five years.

2.3 A site is considered ‘developable’ if development could commence at a later point in time (i.e. not within five years). The fact that a site is not immediately deliverable could be due to a range of factors including existing policy constraints and land ownership issues. Where this is the case, the Local Planning Authority should identify the issues that need to be overcome in order to facilitate development.

2.4 Finally, a site that is neither deliverable nor developable is not considered to be appropriate for development at any point in time.

2.5 It is important to note that the SLAA assesses whether a site could come forward for development, not whether it should. In formulating the development strategy for the District other factors should be considered, in particular the need to promote sustainable patterns of development. This work has largely taken place through the Supporting Document (SSS/001) and the Settlement Appraisals (SSS/002 to SSS/010).

2.6 The sites contained within the SLAA have all been submitted to the Council as part of the ‘Call for Sites’ exercise by landowners, developers and other interested parties. Sites below 0.25 hectares in size have been omitted from the SLAA process.

3.0 District Plan Strategy Worksheet

3.0 A small allowance for SLAA sites has been included within the Strategy Worksheet which forms Appendix B of the District Plan. The SLAA allowance comprises sites in the five main settlements that are considered to be ‘deliverable’ and have a capacity of at least 10 dwellings. Sites under 10 dwellings form part of the ‘windfall allowance’, while sites in villages are also identified separately within the Strategy Worksheet.

3.1 The sites included as part of the SLAA allowance are:

 Land to the rear of 37 – 57 Haymeads Lane, Bishop’s Stortford (01/009) – up to 14 dwellings  Land north of 221 Rye Street, Bishop’s Stortford (01/022) – up to 45 dwellings  Bishop’s Stortford Air Cadet HQ (01/025) – up to 11 dwellings  Land at Braziers Field, Hertford (03/020) – up to 18 dwellings

3.2 These sites have a combined capacity of approximately 88 dwellings. However, site 01/022 has recently received planning permission, and as such, the SLAA allowance has therefore been reduced to 43 dwellings.

3.3 A number of other sites have been concluded to be ‘developable’ i.e. they could potentially be developed in 6 to 10 years. However, these sites are currently within other uses, and as such, they currently cannot be considered to be ‘available’ for development. Given this uncertainty, it is not considered appropriate to include these sites within the Strategy Worksheet.

4. Further Work

4.1 The SLAA will continue to be updated as required in order to reflect changes in circumstances, as well as the inclusion of new sites that may be submitted to the Council through future ‘Call for Sites’ exercises.

SLAA SITE ASSESSMENTS Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N - This greenfield site is located in the Green Belt ouside Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is of the settlement boundary. The site is wholly within Flood through the Call for Sites by the considered Zone 2 with the eastern part in Flood Zone 3 wherein landowner and is considered to achievable. development would not be suitable. Recognising the be available. Bishop's 01/001 Land at Rye Street 2.89 amenity, wildlife and leisure value of the 'green finger', the No No No No Stortford Town Council has designated this area as a Local Green Space in the emerging District Plan. The site is therefore unsuitable for development.

Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha threshold as Land to the Rear Bishop's identified by national policy. 01/002 of 165 and 167 0.0587 Stortford Town Rye Street N - This site is currently located in the Green Belt, outside Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is The site is of the settlement boundary. Located adjacent to an exisiting through the Call for Sites by the considered considered employment area, the site is considered suitable for landowner and is considered to achievable. deliverable Bishop's 01/003 Woodlands Lodge 0.42 employment use, subject to a change in policy. be available. subject to a Stortford Town review of the Green Belt.

Site not assessed as permission has been granted and the Land west of Bishop's principle of development is therefore accepted. 01/004 Farnham Road 8.07 Stortford Town (south of bypass)

Y - This brownfield site is located within the settlement N - Whilst the site has been Y – Site is Up to 21 boundary. It is currently in employment use although not promoted through the Call for considered dwellings designated as an Employment Area within the Local Plan. Sites process, site is currently in achievable. The site is considered to be suitable for residential employment use and is not The site is development subject to marketing of the site. considered available. considered Bishop's developable 01/005 B.J. Ashpole Ltd 0.7 Stortford Town subject to consideration of existing employment use.

Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha threshold as Bishop's identified by national policy. 01/006 34 Rye Street 0.057 Stortford Town

N - This site is currently garden land associated with the Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is existing dwelling. The site is considerd to be unsuitable for through the Call for Sites by the considered Bishop's Land adjacent to 9 future development as it forms part of one of Bishop's landowner and is considered to achievable. 01/007 1.25 No No No No Stortford Town Dolphin Way Stortford's 'green wedges' which help to protect the historic be available. character of the town.

Site not assessed as permission has been granted and the Bishop's Land at Hoggates principle of development is therefore accepted. 01/008 1.19 Stortford Town End Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

Y - This largely greenfield site (garden land) is located Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Up to 14 within the settlement boundary of Bishop's Stortford. An through the Call for Sites, and considered dwellings application for 13 dwellings was previously refused and while there are multiple land achievable. Land to the rear of Bishop's subsequently dismissed on appeal although the Inspector ownerships it is considered to be The site is 01/009 37-57 Haymeads 0.46 Stortford Town suggested the the principle of development in this location available. considered to be Lane was accepted. The site is therefore considered to be deliverable suitable for development.

N - The site is already predominantly within leisure use as it Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is The site is is the site of Bishop's Stortford Football Club. There is through the Call for Sites by the considered considered space around the stadium which potentially could be used landowner and is considered to achievable. deliverable Bishop's Bishop's Stortford 01/010 2.99 for other uses, particularly if the stadium is relocated on be available. subject to a Stortford Town Football Club site. However, at present the site is unsuitable as it is review of the located within the Green Belt. Green Belt.

N - This relatively small site is located within the Green Belt, Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Up to 17 adjacent to the settlement boundary. As such it is currently through the Call for Sites by the considered dwellings unsuitable for development. However, the site is well landowner and is considered to achievable. related to the existing settement and the Green Belt Review be available. The site is concluded that it has 'high' suitability for development. The considered Bishop's 01/011 Thorley Place 0.56 site could therefore be suitable subject to a review of the deliverable Stortford Town Green Belt boundary. subject to a review of the Green Belt

Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha threshold as Bishop's Apton Road Car 01/012 0.22 identified by national policy. Stortford Town Park

N - The site is currently located in the Green Belt, outside of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Up to 53 the settlement boundary and as such is currently unsuitable through the Call for Sites by the considered dwellings for development. However, there are no further policy landowner and is considered to achievable. constraints on the site and the Green Belt Review be available. The site is concludes that the wider area has potential for considered Bishop's Land at Bishop's 01/014 2.12 development. deliverable Stortford Town Stortford Golf Club subject to a review of the Green Belt

Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha threshold as Bishop's identified by national policy. 01/015 Blyth Farm 0.1 Stortford Town

Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha threshold as Bishop's Rock Cottage, identified by national policy. 01/016 0.1 Stortford Town Blyth Farm Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N - This green field site is located within the Green Belt Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is outside of the settlement boundary. The site is designated through the Call for Sites by the considered Land north of as 'open space' in the District Plan. Recognising the landowner and is considered to achievable. Bishop's Great Hadham amenity, wildlife and leisure value of the 'green finger', the be available. 01/017 3.07 No No No No Stortford Town Road & east of Council has also designated this area as a Local Green Monkswood Drive Space in the emerging District Plan. The site is therefore unsuitable for development.

Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha threshold as Bishop's Land South of identified by national policy. 01/018 0.14 Stortford Town Maze Green Road

Y - The majority of this site is within the existing settlement Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is The site is boundary of Bishop's Stortford. A small section is within the through the Call for Sites by the considered considered Junior School Site, Bishop's Green Belt. However, as the proposed use is for education, landowner and is considered to achievable. deliverable for 01/019 Bishop's Stortford 1 Stortford Town it is considered that Very Special Circumstances apply be available. education College which would not require a review of the Green Belt. purposes

Site not assessed as permission has been granted and the Bishop's Land at Dane principle of development is therefore accepted. 01/020 17.96 Stortford Town O'Coys Road

Site not assessed as permission has been granted and the Bishop's principle of development is therefore accepted. 01/021 Whitehall Leys 0.98 Stortford Town

Site not assessed as permission has been granted and the principle of development is therefore accepted. Bishop's Land north of 221 01/022 1.5 Stortford Town Rye Street

Site not assessed as permission has been granted and the Bishop's Land north-east of principle of development is therefore accepted. 01/023 18.78 Stortford Town Farnham Road

Site not assessed as permission has been granted and the ASRs 1-5, SCA Bishop's principle of development is therefore accepted. 01/024 and adjoining 154.05 Stortford Town Green Belt

Y - This brownfield site is located within the settlement Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Up to 11 boundary and as such there is no in principle objection to through the Call for Sites by the considered dwellings development in this location. In order for residential landowner and is considered to achievable. Bishop's Bishop's Stortford development to come forward an alternative location for the be available. The site is 01/025 0.42 Stortford Town Air Cadet HQ existing Air Cadet HQ would need to be found. considered deliverable.

Site not assessed as permission has been granted and the Land adjacent to Bishop's principle of development is therefore accepted. 01/027 Bournebrook 0.47 Stortford Town House Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

Y - This brownfield site is located in a central location. Y - The site is owned by East Y – Site is Up to 42 Planning permission had previously been secured but has Herts Council which has considered dwellings since lapsed. Part of the site is located within Flood Zone 3 intentions to develop the site. achievable. Council Offices & Bishop's and would not be suitable for development. The rest of the The site is 01/028 land at The 1.4 Stortford Town site is considered suitable. considered Causeway deliverable

N - This greenfield site is located within the Green Belt, Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is outside of the settlement boundary. The Inspector to the through the Call for Sites by the considered Examination of the adopted Local Plan 2007 stated that landowner and is considered to achievable. development of this site would amount to a protruding be available. Bishop's Land at developed wedge, poorly related to the form and pattern of 01/030 0.93 No No No No Stortford Town Hallingbury Road the settlement. The Green Belt Review also suggested that the broad parcel plays a signifcant role in preventing sprawl. As such the site is considered to be unsuitable.

Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha threshold as Bishop's 01/031 Oxford House 0.2 identified by national policy. Stortford Town

Y - This brownfield site is located within the settlement N - Whilst the site has been Y – Site is boundary. It is currently in employment use although not promoted through the Call for considered Up to 8 designated as an Employment Area within the Local Plan. Sites process, site is currently in achievable. dwellings The site is considered to be suitable for residential employment use and is not The site is Bishop's Stortford development subject to marketing of the site. considered available. Bishop's considered 01/032 Delivery Office & 0.27 Stortford Town developable Post Office subject to consideraton of employment uses.

N - This greenfield site is located within the Green Belt, Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is outside of the settlement boundary. The majority of the site through the Call for Sites by the considered is located within Flood Zone 2 wherein the Sequential Test landowner and is considered to achievable. would need to be applied. The Green Belt Review states be available. Bishop's Land at Styleman's 01/033 4.68 that this broad area plays a signifcant role in preventing No No No No Stortford Town Farm sprawl and the site is also poorly related to the existing urban area. As such the site is considered to be unsuitable.

Site not assessed as this is not a proposal for development. Land west of Bishop's 01/042 Farnham Road Stortford Town (north of bypass)

Site not assessed as permission has been granted and the Land at principle of development is therefore accepted. Bishop's 01/043 Bournebrook & 1.39 Stortford Town Partridges Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

Y - This brownfield site is located within the settlement N - Whilst the site has been Y – Site is boundary and was previously allocated for development promoted through the Call for considered Up to 43 within the adopted Local Plan. It is currently in employment Sites process, site is currently in achievable. dwellings use although not designated as an Employment Area within employment use and is not the Local Plan. The site is considered to be suitable for considered available. The site is considered Bishop's residential development subject to marketing of the site. 01/119 The Mill Site 1.42 developable Stortford Town subject to consideration of existing employment use

Y - This vacant brownfield site is located is located within Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Up to 400 the settlement boundary and was previously allocated for through the Call for Sites by the considered dwellings development within the adopted Local Plan. The site is landowner and is considered to achievable. Bishop's considered suitable for development. An application has be available. The site is 01/120 The Goods Yard 5.25 Stortford Town been submitted for 682 dwellings. In addition the site has considered been identified within the District Plan for 400 dwellings. deliverable.

N - The site is currently located in the Green Belt, outside of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Up to 104 the settlement boundary and as such is currently unsuitable through the Call for Sites by the considered dwellings for development. However, there are no further policy landowner and is considered to achievable. constraints on the site and the Green Belt Review be available. The site is concludes that the wider area has potential for considered Bishop's Land at Bishop's 01/136 4.16 development. deliverable Stortford Town Stortford Golf Club subject to a review of the Green Belt

Y - This brownfield site is located within the settlement N - Whilst the site has been Y – Site is Up to 44 boundary and as such there is no in principle objection to promoted through the Call for considered dwellings development in this location. In order for residential Sites process, site is currently in achievable. development to come forward an alternative location for the use as a fire station and is not The site is existing Fire Station would need to be found. considered available. considered Bishop's Patmore Close 01/139 1.45 developable Stortford Town and Fire Station subject to relocation of the Fire Station.

Y - This greenfield site is in use as a sports field associated N - Whilst the site has been Y – Site is Up to 103 with the High School and is designated under Policy LRC1 promoted through the Call for considered dwellings in the Local Plan. The site is considered suitable for Sites process, site is currently in achievable. development subject to the relocation of the sports facilities use as a sports field and is not The site is Sports field to a suitable alternative site. considered available. considered Bishop's associated with 01/157 3.44 developable Stortford Town Birchwood High subject to School relocation of the sports facilities Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N -This green field site is located to the south of Bishop's Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Up to 102 Stortford between London Road and the railway line. At through the Call for Sites by the considered dwellings present, London Road forms a clear Green Belt boundary. landowner and is considered to achievable. While the railway line would contain development to the be available. The site is east there is no obvious boundary to the south of the site. considered Bishop's Land east of 01/158 3.4 However, consideration could be given to development in deliverable Stortford Town London Road this location. Nevertheless, it is considered unsuitable due subject to a to its location in te Geen Belt. review of the Green Belt

N - this partly greenfield site is located adjacent to the Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Up to 22 settlement boundary and north of Southern Country Park. through the Call for Sites by the considered dwellings The site is well related to the existing settlement and the landowner and is considered to achievable. Green Belt Review suggested that the broad parcel of land be available. The site is Bishop's Land east of had 'high' suitability for development. However, at present, considered 01/159 0.73 Stortford Town Thorley Lane East it is considered unsuitable due to its Green Belt location. deliverable subject to a review of the Green Belt

N - Whilst the site is within the settlement boundary the Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is majority of the site is within Flood Zone 3. In addition it through the Call for Sites by the considered forms a functional link with the large open swathes of land landowner and is considered to achievable. Bishop's Land south of to the west and is an integral part of the riverscape. As such be available. 01/160 1.32 No No No No Stortford Town Cannons Mill Lane the site is considered unsuitable for development.

N - This greenfield site is located within the settlement Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is boundary. The majority of the site is located within Flood through the Call for Sites by the considered Zone 2 wherein the Sequential Test would need to be landowner and is considered to achievable. applied. The site forms a visual and functional link with the be available. Bishop's Land north of 01/161 1.43 large swathes of open land to the west and is an integral No No No No Stortford Town Cannons Mill Lane part of the river landscape. As such the site is considered to be unsuitable.

N - This greenfield site is located to the west of the A1184 Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is within the Green Belt. The A1184 forms a strong Green Belt through the Call for Sites by the considered boundary at present which should not be breached. In landowner and is considered to achievable. Bishop's Finch Croft, addition, the site would be relatively poorly related to the be available. 01/162 1.58 No No No No Stortford Town Thorley Lane West existing urban area and is considered unsuitable for development. Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N - This greenfield site is located to the south of Owles Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Up to 96 Lane. While the site is well related to the former Sainsburys through the Call for Sites by the considered dwellings depot which is currently being re-developed, development landowner and is considered to achievable. of the majority of the site would represent a serious be available. The site is incursion into the countryside and would significantly harm considered the rural setting of Buntingford and the surrounding area. deliverable Buntingford Land south of 02/001 12.24 The north western section of the site, which does not subject to a Town Owles Lane extend beyond the urban form of the Sainsbury's site could review of the be suitable. However, it lies within the Rural Area Beyond settlement the Green Belt and, as such the site is considered to be boundary. unsuitable.

Site not assessed as permission has been granted and the Buntingford Land to the rear of 02/002 18.22 principle of development is therefore accepted. Town Snells Mead

Site not assessed as permission has been granted and the Land off Buntingford principle of development is therefore accepted. 02/003 Longmead/Baldoc 1.2 Town k Road

Site not assessed as permission has been granted and the principle of development is therefore accepted. Land south of the Buntingford Causeway & north 02/004 11.73 Town of Hare Street Road

N - This large greenfield site is located within the Rural Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Up to 400 Area Beyond the Green Belt, between the existing urban through the Call for Sites by the considered dwellings area and the A10. The site is well related to the existing landowner and is considered to achievable. settlement and any incursion into the countryside would be be available. The site is limited by the presence of the A10 which would form the considered western boundary of the site. While the site could be deliverable Land west of considered developable subject to a review of the subject to a Buntingford Buntingford 02/005 21.25 settlement boundary, the impact of a development of this review of the Town (between Monks size on existing infrastructure, and the ability to provide new settlement Walk & A10) services and facilities as part of the development, would boundary. need to be carefully considered. A planning application for 400 homes has been submitted.

Site not assessed as permission has been granted and the Aspenden Bridge principle of development is therefore accepted. Buntingford (opposite 02/006 2.78 Town Watermill Industrial Estate) Site not assessed as permission has been granted and the Buntingford Former 02/007 10.93 principle of development is therefore accepted. Town Sainsbury's Depot Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N - This greenfield site is located to the south of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Up to 64 Buntingford, outside of the settlement boundary. While it is through the Call for Sites by the considered dwellings well related to the existing settlement, it is currently landowner and is considered to achievable. unsuitable due to its location within the Rural Area Beyond be available. The site is the Green Belt. considered Buntingford Land west of deliverable 02/008 2.14 Town London Road subject to a review of the settlement boundary.

Site not assessed as permission has been granted and the Buntingford Land west of principle of development is therefore accepted. 02/009 17.39 Town Ermine Street

N - This greenfield site is located to th south of Buntingford, Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Up to 22 east of Aspenden Road. The site is well related to the through the Call for Sites by the considered dwellings existing settlement, particularly as land immediately to the landowner and is considered to achievable. south has recently been given permission at appeal. The be available. The site is site is considered to be unsuitable due to its location within considered Buntingford Land at Aspenden the Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt. deliverable 02/011 0.73 Town Road subject to a review of the settlement boundary.

N- This site is located to the north of Hertford outside of the Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Up to 50 settlement boundary. While the site is well related to through the Call for Sites by the considered dwellings existing urban area it is currently unsuitable for landowner and is considered to achievable. development due to its location within the Green Belt. be available. The site is However, the site is part of an area proposed for considered Bengeo Plant 03/001 Hertford Town 1.68 development within the emerging District Plan. deliverable Nursery subject to a review of the Green Belt

Y - This brownfield site is located within the settlement Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Up to 193 boundary of Hertford. The site is allocated for employment through the Call for Sites by the considered dwellings use within the adopted Local Plan. However, the Plan landowner and is considered to acheivable. National Grid Site/ establishes the potential for residential development on be available. The site is 03/002 Hertford Town 4.2 Norbury Woodyard land east of Marshgate Drive. As such the site is considered considered to be suitable for development as part of a deliverable. mixed use scheme. Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N - This greenfield site is located immediately to the east of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is the trainline, and is poorly related to the main built up area. through the Call for Sites by the considered The site forms part of a green finger and is located within landowner and is considered to achievable. Land north of the Green Belt. As such the site is considered unsuitable for be available. 03/003 Hertford Town 0.47 No No No No Molewood Road development.

N - This greenefield site is located to the west of the Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is trainline and adjacent to Goldings Estate Historic Park and through the Call for Sites by the considered Garden. The site is wholly located with Flood Zone 3. The landowner and is considered to achievable. Land east of North 03/004 Hertford Town 3.04 majority of the site is also located within the Green Belt. As be available. No No No No Road such development in this location is considered unsuitable.

N - This greenfield site is located to the south of Hertford, Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Up to 50 adjacent to Balls Park. The site is currently part of a Green through the Call for Sites by the considered dwellings Finger. However, the eastern section of the site lies landowner and is considered to achievable. between two areas of residential development and be available. The eastern development of this section is unlikely to cause significant section of the site Land west of harm to the Green Finger. The western section of the site is is considered 03/005 Hertford Town 4.87 Mangrove Road should be maintained as green space. Overall, the site is deliverable currently unsuitable due to its location in the Green Belt. subject to a review of the Green Belt.

N - This greenfield site is located to the south of Hertford, Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is immediately to the north of the A414. While the site is well through the Call for Sites by the considered related to the existing urban area, it forms part of a green landowner and is considered to achievable. finger and is located within the Green Belt. In addition, the be available. Land adjacent to site is covered by mature trees and adds to the character of 03/006 Hertford Town 2.34 No No No No London Road the town in this location. As such the site is considered unsuitable for development.

N - This greenfield site, whilst located within the built up Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is area of Hertford, is covered by a blanket TPO (TPO No through the Call for Sites by the considered 403) and as such is considered unsuitable for development. landowner and is considered to achievable. 03/007 Hertford Town The Old Orchard 0.29 No No No No be available. Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

Y - This brownfield site is located within the settlement N - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Up to 18 boundary, east of the A414. The site could be suitable for through the Call for Sites. considered dwellings development subject to the relocation of the Fire Station. However, due to the existing achievable uses on site, and the need for The site is these to be relocated, the site is considered Hertford Fire not currently considered to be developable 03/008 Hertford Town Station & Fire 0.59 available. Nevertheless the site subject to Service HQ could become available later in relocation of the the plan period. Fire Station.

Y - This site is located within the settlement boundary and is N - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Up to 14 currently in use as allotments. It is well related to existing through the Call for Sites. conisidered dwellings development and is considered to be suitable for However, due to the existing achievable development subject to the relocation of the current use. uses on site, and the need for The site is these to be relocated, the site is considered West Street 03/009 Hertford Town 0.45 not currently considered to be developable Allotments available. subject to relocation of the existing use.

N - This greenfield site is located to the west of Hertford, Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Up to 300 adjacent to Panshanger Park and Garden. The site is through the Call for Sites by the considered dwellings currently located within the Green Belt and as such is landowner and is considered to achievable. considered unsuitable for development. However, the site is be available. The site is Land west of well related to the built up area and has been proposed for considered Thieves Lane & 03/010 Hertford Town 11.37 release from the Green Belt through the emerging District deliverable south of Welwyn Plan. subject to a Road review of the Green Belt.

13-19 Castle Mead Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha threshold as 03/012 Hertford Town 0.21 Gardens identified by national policy. Land to the East of Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha threshold as 03/013 Hertford Town East Lodge, Balls 0.07 identified by national policy. Park Land west of Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha threshold as 03/014 Hertford Town London Road 0.22 identified by national policy. Cottages Land to the rear of Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha threshold as 03/015 Hertford Town 0.07 Fireflies identified by national policy. N - This brownfield site is located within the settlement N - Whilst the site has been Y – Site is boundary, adjacent to the River Lea. It is currently promoted through the Call for considered considered to be unsuitable as the site is designated as an Sites process, site is currently in achievable. 03/016 Hertford Town 1-14 Dicker Mill 0.45 Employment Area. employment use and is not No No No No considered available. Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

Y - This brownfield site is located within the settlement N - Whilst the site has been Y – Site is Up to 8 boundary. While not allocated as an Employment Area, it is promoted through the Call for considered dwellings in current employment use. The site could be suitable for Sites process, site is currently in achievable. residential development subject to marketing of the site. employment use and is not The site is considered available. considered 30-34 and 33-41 03/017 Hertford Town 0.25 No developable No No Chambers Street subject to consideraton of employment uses.

Site not assessed as permission has been granted and Former McMullen 03/018 Hertford Town 2.36 development is complete. Brewery N - This large greenfield site forms part the Goldings Estate Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Historic Park and Garden. The site is poorly related to the through the Call for Sites by the considered village of Waterford. the majority of the site is identified as landowner and is considered to achievable. 03/019 Hertford Town Goldings Manor 40.47 an area of protected open space. The site is also located be available. No No No No within the Green Belt and as such is considered unsuitable for development.

Y - This greenfield site is located within the settlement Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Up to 18 boundary. While the topography of the site could be through the Call for Sites by the considered dwellings challenging, it is considered to be suitable. landowner and is considered to achievable. Land at Braziers 03/020 Hertford Town 0.59 be available. The site is Field considered deliverable.

N - This site is part of the Goldings Estate Historic Park and Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Garden. The site is located within the Green Belt, isolated through the Call for Sites by the considered from the built up area of Hertford, and as such is landowner and is considered to achievable. Goldings, Orchard 03/021 Hertford Town 1.37 considered unsuitable for development. be available. No No No No House

N - This site is located in the Green Belt outside of the Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is settlement boundary. The whole site is covered by a blanket through the Call for Sites by the considered TPO (TPO No 4). As such while the site is well related to landowner and is considered to achievable. 03/022 Hertford Town Chelmsford Lodge 1.54 existing urban area it is considered unsuitable for be available. No No No No development.

Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha threshold as Adjacent 145 03/023 Hertford Town 0.052 identified by national policy. North Road Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

Y - This brownfield site is located within the settlement N - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Up to 13 boundary, and as such is considered suitable for through the Call for Sites. considered dwellings development subject to the relocation of the existing use. However, due to the existing achievable uses on site, and the need for The site is this to be relocated, the site is considered to Hertford Delivery 03/024 Hertford Town 0.42 not currently considered to be be developable Office available. subject to relocation of the existing use.

N - This greenfield site is located within the Green Belt to Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is the south of Hertford and to the west of Mangrove Road. through the Call for Sites by the considered While the site is reasonably well related to the existing landowner and is considered to achievable. settlement, development would extend the ribbon of be available. Land west of development along Mangrove Road. In addition, 03/025 Hertford Town 2.76 No No No No Mangrove Road development of the western half of the site would extend beyond the current urban form and would harm the character of the Green Finger. As such, the site is considered to be unsuitable.

This site has not been assessed as it is already in current Land east of employment use. Marshgate Drive 03/111 Hertford Town 7.47 (residual part of employment area)

N - This largely greenfield site is located to the north of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Up to 150 Hertford. The majority of the site extends well beyond the through the Call for Sites by the considered dwellings existing urban form and development of the site in its landowner and is considered to achievable. entireity would lead to an unacceptable incursion into the be available. The site is Green Belt, and the countryside in general. The southern considered Land at Wadesmill part of the site, including the nursery, is well related to the deliverable 03/120 Hertford Town 76.4 Road existing settlement and as such could be considered subject to a developable subject to a review of the Green Belt. This part review of the of the site has been identified as a proposed allocation Green Belt. within the emerging District Plan.

N - This large greenfield site is located within the Green Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Belt to the south of Hertford. The railway line forms a strong through the Call for Sites by the considered Green Belt boundary in this location and should not be landowner and is considered to achievable. breached. In addition, development would be poorly related be available. Land south of to the existing urban area and would result in an 03/134 Hertford Town 15.6 No No No No Hornsmill Road unacceptable incursion into the countryside. As such this site is considered to be unsuitable for development. Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N - This greenfield site is located to the west of Hertford. Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Up to 300 Part of the site is a county wildlife site and would therefore through the Call for Sites by the considered dwellings be unsuitable for development. While the remainder of the landowner and is considered to achievable. site is well related to the existing urban area, it is within the be available. The site is Green Belt and therefore currently unsuitable. The site has considered Land north of been identified for development within the emerging District deliverable 03/152 Hertford Town 11.62 Welwyn Road Plan. subject to a review of the Green Belt.

N - This greenfield site is located within the Green Belt to Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is the south of Hertford. The site forms an integral part of the through the Call for Sites by the considered Green Finger and any development would harm its landowner and is considered to achievable. openness and character by breaching the existing line of be available. Land east of 03/153 Hertford Town 1.95 the urban form. As such the site is not considered to be No No No No Queens Road suitable for development.

N - This is a greenfield site located on the edge of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Hertingfordbury. The site is considered to be unsuitable as through the Call for Sites by the considered it is located within the Green Belt, on the edge of a Group 2 landowner and is considered to achievable. Land at St Marys 03/154 Hertford Town 1.92 village. However the site could not be considered to be infill be available. No No No No Lane development and so would remain unsuitable under the draft Plan.

N - This brownfield site is located within the settlement N - Whilst the site has been Y – Site is boundary, adjacent to the River Lea. It is currently promoted through the Call for considered considered to be unsuitable as the site is designated as an Sites process, site is currently in achievable. 6-10 Marshgate 03/156 Hertford Town 0.69 Employment Area employment use and is not No No No No Trading Estate considered available.

N - This brownfield site is located within the settlement N - Whilst the site has been Y – Site is boundary. The site is a designated Employment Area and promoted through the Call for considered forms a key part of the local employment offer. As such the Sites process, site is currently in achievable. Hertford Industrial site is considered to be unsuitable for development. employment use and is not 03/157 Hertford Town 2.9 No No No No Estate considered available. Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N - This greenfield site is located to the south of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Sawbridgeworth. It is surrounded on three sides by existing through the Call for Sites by the considered development and would therefore relates well to the built up landowner and is considered to achievable. structure of the town. However, the site forms part of a be available. wider strategic section of Green Belt that prevents Sawbridgewort coalescence of the town with Harlow. Although in itself 04/001 Land at 'The Colt' 2.51 No No No No h Town development of the site would not reduce the gap between the two settlements, further urbanisation and reduction in openness of this strategically important area of Green Belt land should be resisted.

Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha threshold as Sawbridgewort Land to the North 04/002 0.2 identified by national policy. h Town of Dell Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha threshold as Sawbridgewort Land to the rear of 04/003 0.21 identified by national policy. h Town 4 Newports N - This greenfield site is located to the south of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Sawbridgeworth, part of which is within a county wildlife through the Call for Sites by the considered site. The site forms part of a wider strategic section of landowner and is considered to achievable. Land adjacent to Sawbridgewort Green Belt that prevents coalescence of the town with High be available. 04/004 east edge of 4.08 No No No No h Town Wych. Development would directly reduce the gap between Rowney Wood the two settlements.

N - This greenfield site is located to the south of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Up to 120 Sawbridgeworth. A large county wildlife site is located on through the Call for Sites by the considered dwellings the site and would not be suitable for development. The landowner and is considered to achievable. site forms part of a wider strategic section of Green Belt be available. The site is that prevents coalescence of the town with High Wych. considered Sawbridgewort Land at Thomas Development of the site as a whole would have a significant deliverable 04/005 27.9 h Town Rivers Hospital impact on the countryside in this location. However, subject to a development of the eastern part of the site would not review of the reduce the gap between the two settlements and could be Green Belt. considered suitable.

N - This greenfield site is located to the west of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Up to 175 Sawbridgeworth and to the south of West Road. through the Call for Sites by the considered dwellings Development would relate well to the existing urban area. landowner and is considered to achievable. However, the site is currently within Green Belt and is be available. The site is therefore considered to be unsuitable at present. The considered Sawbridgewort Land at Chalk's 04/006 14.19 western part of the site is considered to be more sensitive deliverable h Town Farm in Green Belt terms than the eastern part and should subject to a remain undeveloped. review of the Green Belt. Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N - This very large greenfield site is located on the western Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is side of Sawbridgeworth. Development of the site would through the Call for Sites by the considered represent a wholly inappropriate incursion into the landowner and is considered to achievable. countryside. Furthermore the southern part of the site lies be available. Sawbridgewort Land west of within an area of Green Belt that is of strategic importance 04/007 108.84 No No No No h Town Sawbridgeworth given that it prevents the coalescence of Sawbridgeworth with High Wych. The site is therefore considered to be unsuitable for development.

N - This part greenfield site is located within the Green Belt Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Up to 31 on the northern edge of Sawbridgeworth. When viewed in through the Call for Sites by the considered dwellings isloation, the site is separated from the existing main built landowner and is considered to achievable. up area of the town and as such is considered to be be available. The site is unsuitable. However, it could be brought forward in considered conjunction with site 04/056. deliverable Sawbridgewort Land at Northfield 04/008 1.04 No No subject to a No h Town House review of the Green Belt and if brought forward with 04/056

N - This greenfield site is located to the south of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Sawbridgeworth. The site forms part of a wider strategic through the Call for Sites by the considered section of Green Belt that prevents coalescence of the town landowner and is considered to achievable. with High Wych. Although in itself development of the site be available. Sawbridgewort Land north of 04/009 8.79 would not reduce the gap between the two settlements, No No No No h Town Chaseways further urbanisation and reduction in openness of this strategically important area of Green Belt land should be resisted.

N - This greenfield site is located to the south of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Sawbridgeworth. The site forms part of a wider strategic through the Call for Sites by the considered section of Green Belt that prevents coalescence of the town landowner and is considered to achievable. with High Wych. Although in itself development of the site be available. Sawbridgewort Land adjacent to would not reduce the gap between the two settlements, 04/010 1 No No No No h Town Primrose Cottage further urbanisation and reduction in openness of this strategically important area of Green Belt land should be resisted.

N - This greenfield site is located within the Green Belt to Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is the south of Sawbridgeworth. Development of the site through the Call for Sites by the considered would lead to the coalescence of Sawbridgeworth and landowner and is considered to achievable. The Piggeries Harlow. As such it is not considered suitable for be available. Sawbridgewort (land south & west 04/011 4.05 development. No No No No h Town of the Coach House) Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N - This part greenfield site is located within the Green Belt Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is on the northern edge of Sawbridgeworth. It has the potential through the Call for Sites by the considered to form part of the larger site alongside neighbouring land. landowner and is considered to achievable. Sawbridgewort The Bungalow and However, when viewed in isloation, the site is separated be available. 04/012 5.29 No No No No h Town land to the east from the existing main built up area of the town and as such is considered to be unsuitable.

N - This greenfield site is located to the west of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Up to 125 Sawbridgeworth and to the north of West Road. through the Call for Sites by the considered dwellings Development would relate well to the existing urban area. landowner and is considered to achievable. However, the site is currently within Green Belt and is be available. The site is Brickwell Fields therefore considered to be unsuitable at present. The site considered to be Sawbridgewort 04/013 (land north of West 5.93 was identified within the emerging District Plan as a deliverable h Town Road) proposed allocation for 100 dwellings. subject to a review of the Green Belt.

N - This site is located on the eastern side of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Sawbridgeworth and forms an integral part of the river through the Call for Sites by the considered landscape in this area. In addition, the site is located within landowner and is considered to achievable. a strategically important parcel of Green Belt that helps be available. Sawbridgewort Land south of 04/014 0.73 prevent the coalescence of Sawbridgeworth with Lower No No No No h Town Bridgefoot House Sheering. The site is therefore considered to be unsuitable for development.

N - This site is located on the eastern side of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Sawbridgeworth and forms an integral part of the river through the Call for Sites by the considered landscape in this area. In addition, the site is located within landowner and is considered to achievable. Land west of the a strategically important parcel of Green Belt that helps be available. Sawbridgewort River Stort and 04/015 2.99 prevent the coalescence of Sawbridgeworth with Lower No No No No h Town south of Station Sheering. The site is therefore considered to be unsuitable Road for development.

N - This is a brownfield site located on the edge of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Spellbrook. The site is considered to be unsuitable as it is through the Call for Sites by the considered located within the Green Belt, on the edge of a Group 2 landowner and is considered to achievable. Land north & south Sawbridgewort villlage. However the site could not be considered to be infill be available. 04/017 of Spellbrook Lane 11.21 No No No No h Town development and so would remain unsuitable under the West draft Plan.

Y - The site consists of a nursery and orchard, much of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is which is designated as a county wildlife site. The site is through the Call for Sites by the considered suitable for community uses which would preserve and landowner and is considered to achievable. Sawbridgewort Land at Thomas Deliverable for 04/018 27.9 enhance this asset. be available. h Town Rivers Nursery community use Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N - This greenfield site is located to the south of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Sawbridgeworth. It forms part of a wider strategic section of through the Call for Sites by the considered Green Belt that prevents coalescence of the town with landowner and is considered to achievable. Harlow and High Wych. Although in itself development of be available. Sawbridgewort the site would not reduce the gap between the two 04/055 Triangle Nurseries 3.86 No No No No h Town settlements, further urbanisation and reduction in openness of this strategically important area of Green Belt land should be resisted.

N - This greenfield site is located to the north of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Up to 76 Sawbridgeworth. As it is adjacent to the settlement through the Call for Sites by the considered dwellings boundary, it is well related to the existing urban area. landowner and is considered to achievable. However the site is within the Green Belt and is therefore be available. The site is Sawbridgewort Land at Kecksys currently considered to be unsuitable. considered 04/056 2.53 h Town Farm deliverable subject to a review of the Green Belt

N - This site is located on the edge of Spellbrook. It is Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered to be unsuitable as it is located within the Green through the Call for Sites by the considered Belt, on the edge of a Group 2 village and could not be landowner and is considered to achievable. Sawbridgewort 04/060 Lock Pavillion 0.27 considered to be infill development. be available. No No No No h Town

N - This greenfield site is located within Spellbrook. Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Up to 5 dwellings Development in this location is likely to be considered infill through the Call for Sites by the considered and is therefore appropriate for limited development landowner and is considered to achievable. The site is Sawbridgewort Paddock adjacent be available. considered 04/061 0.42 h Town to the Old Cottage deliverable

N - This site is located on the eastern side of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Sawbridgeworth and forms an integral part of the river through the Call for Sites by the considered landscape in this area. In addition, the site is located within landowner and is considered to achievable. a strategically important parcel of Green Belt that helps be available. Sawbridgewort Land north of 04/062 5.75 prevent the coalescence of Sawbridgeworth with Lower No No No No h Town Station Road Sheering. The site is therefore considered to be unsuitable for development. Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N - This greenfield site is located to the south of Ware. The Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is site forms part of a wider strategic section of Green Belt through the Call for Sites by the considered that prevents coalescence of the town with Hertford and landowner and is considered to achievable. Great Amwell. Further urbanisation and reduction in be available. 05/001 Ware Town Presdales Pit 11.23 openness of this strategically important area of Green Belt No No No No land should be resisted. As such, the site is considered to be unsuitable for development.

Site not assessed as permission has been granted and 05/002 Ware Town Leaside Depot 1.8 development is complete.

N - This greenfield site is located to the north west of Ware. Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is While the site is within the route of the A10, and is well through the Call for Sites by the considered related to the existing settlement, it forms part of Poles Park landowner and is considered to achievable. Nuns' Triangle which is designated as a historic park or garden. The site is be available. (land bound by 05/003 Ware Town 10.65 also currently located within the Green Belt. As such, the No No No No A10/A1170/Quince site is considered to be unsuitable for development. y Road)

N - This greenfield site is located to the north of Ware. The Y - The site has been promoted Y - The site is The site could site is well related to the existing urban area and could be through the Call for Sites by the considered to be form part of a appropriate for development, either in isolation or as part of landowner and is considered to achievable at larger strategic a larger strategic site. However, at present the site is be available. present. scale considered to be unsuitable due to its location within the However, in development in Green Belt. order to deliver a this location strategic scale of subject to a development, review of the Land south of major Green Belt. Fanhams Hall infrastructure 05/004 Ware Town 5.2 Road & east of would be Trinity Centre required. Further work would therefore be required to assess achievability.

N - This greenfield site is currently in use as allotments Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is associated with Presdales School. The site is relatively well through the Call for Sites by the considered Up to 34 related to the existing urban area, however it is considered landowner and is considered to achievable. dwellings to be unsuitable for development due to its location in the be available. Horticultural Green Belt. The site is 05/005 Ware Town Nursery, Presdales 1.12 considered to be School deliverable subject to a review of the Green Belt Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha threshold as Baldock Street Car 05/007 Ware Town 0.23 identified by national policy. Park N - This greenfield site is located to the south of Ware. The Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is site forms part of a wider strategic section of Green Belt through the Call for Sites by the considered that prevents coalescence of the town with Hertford. Further landowner and is considered to achievable. Old Hertfordians urbanisation and reduction in openness of this strategically be available. 05/008 Ware Town 2.27 No No No No Rugby Club important area of Green Belt land should be resisted. As such, the site is considered to be unsuitable for development.

Site not assessed as permission has been granted and Land East of development is complete. 05/009 Ware Town 1.8 Trinity Centre

Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha threshold as Ware Library and identified by national policy. 05/010 Ware Town the Old Fire 0.1 Station

Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha threshold as 05/011 Ware Town 2B Star Street 0.1 identified by national policy.

N - This greenfield site is located to the south of Ware. The Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is site forms part of a wider strategic section of Green Belt through the Call for Sites by the considered that prevents coalescence of the town with Hertford. Further landowner and is considered to achievable. urbanisation and reduction in openness of this strategically be available. Land at Rush 05/013 Ware Town 14.61 important area of Green Belt land should be resisted. As No No No No Green such, the site is considered to be unsuitable for development.

N - This greenfield site is located within the Crane Mead Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is area of Ware. While the site is well related to existing through the Call for Sites by the considered development, a number of concerns lead to the site being landowner and is considered to achievable. considered unsuitable. The site forms part of a wider be available. strategic section of Green Belt that prevents coalescence of the town with Great Amwell. Although in itself development of the site would not reduce the gap between the two Land at Crane 05/014 Ware Town 1.66 settlements, further urbanisation and reduction in openness No No No No Mead of this strategically important area of Green Belt land should be resisted. Furthermore, a large part of the site lies within Flood Zone 3. In addition, development may impact negatively on the adjacent Lee Valley Regional Park.

Site not assessed as permission has been granted and the principle of development is therefore accepted. 05/015 Ware Town Swains Mill 0.4 Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N - This partly greenfield site is located to the south of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Ware. The site forms part of a wider strategic section of through the Call for Sites by the considered Green Belt that prevents coalescence of the town with landowner and is considered to achievable. Land at Chadwell Hertford. Further urbanisation and reduction in openness of be available. 05/016 Ware Town Springs Golf 4.27 this strategically important area of Green Belt land should No No No No Course be resisted. As such, the site is considered to be unsuitable for development.

N - This partly greenfield site is located to the south of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Ware. The site forms part of a wider strategic section of through the Call for Sites by the considered Green Belt that prevents coalescence of the town with landowner and is considered to achievable. Hertford. Further urbanisation and reduction in openness of be available. 05/017 Ware Town Land at Little Acres 2.16 this strategically important area of Green Belt land should No No No No be resisted. As such, the site is considered to be unsuitable for development.

Site not assessed as permission has been granted and 05/018 Ware Town Cintel Site 2.1 development is complete.

N - This partly greenfield site is located to the south of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Ware. The site forms part of a wider strategic section of through the Call for Sites by the considered Green Belt that prevents coalescence of the town with landowner and is considered to achievable. 05/019 Ware Town Hale Club 3.85 Hertford. Further urbanisation and reduction in openness of be available. No No No No this strategically important area of Green Belt land should be resisted. As such, the site is considered to be unsuitable for development. This site has been assessed as part of site 44/005. Land east of Ware 05/020 Ware Town (to the rear of 11.75 Cozens Road) Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha threshold as Land at King identified by national policy. 05/021 Ware Town 0.1 George Road

Site not assessed as permission has been granted and the Swains Mill & land principle of development is therefore accepted. 05/022 Ware Town south of Crane 0.82 Mead

N - This greenfield site is located to the west of Ware. Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is While the site is within the route of the A10, and is well through the Call for Sites by the considered related to existing development, it is within the Green Belt landowner and is considered to achievable. and much of the site is subject to a Tree Preservation be available. Land at Trapstyle Order. The area that is not wooded is seperate from the 05/090 Ware Town 0.72 No No No No Woods existing built up area, as well as being located immediately adjacent to the A10. As such the site is considered to be unsuitable for development. Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N - This greenfield site is located off Viaduct Road. While it Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is is well related to existing development, the site lies within through the Call for Sites by the considered the Green Belt. In addition, the green space plays an landowner and is considered to achievable. important role in maintaining the semi-rural character of this be available. 05/096 Ware Town Viaduct Road 1.2 No No No No part of Ware. As such it is considered to be unsuitable for development.

N - This greenfield site is located to the north of Ware. The Y - The site has been promoted Y - The site is The site could site is well related to the existing urban area and could be through the Call for Sites by the considered to be form part of a appropriate for development, either in isolation or as part of landowner and is considered to achievable at larger strategic a larger strategic site. However, at present the site is be available. present. scale considered to be unsuitable due to its location within the However, in development in Green Belt. order to deliver a this location strategic scale of subject to a development, review of the major Green Belt. infrastructure Great Cozens 05/100 Ware Town 3.5 would be Fordham Land required. Further work would therefore be required to assess achievability.

N - This greenfield site is located within the Rural Area Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Beyond the Green Belt. The site is open land, unrelated to a through the Call for Sites by the considered Bride Croft (land settlement. Development in this location would be an landowner and is considered to achievable. 06/001 Albury south of Upwick 6.25 unacceptable intrusion into open countryside, and as such be available. No No No No Green Road) is considered to be unsuitable.

N - This greenfield site is located within the Rural Area Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Beyond the Green Belt. It is unrelated to a settlement and through the Call for Sites by the considered Salmon Mead development in this location would be an unacceptable landowner and is considered to achievable. (land east of Tatts intrusion into open countryside. As such it is considered to be available. 06/002 Albury Cottage; now 0.96 be unsuitable. No No No No known as The Nook)

N - This greenfield site is located within the Rural Area Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Beyond the Green Belt on the edge of a Group 2 village. through the Call for Sites by the considered Land south-east of The site does not represent infill development and any landowner and is considered to achievable. 07/001 Anstey Anstey village 0.52 development in this location would represent an be available. No No No No school unacceptable encroachment into the countryside, and as such is considered to be unsuitable. Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N – This brownfield site is identified as an Employment N - While the site has been Y – Site is Area which is located in the Rural Area Beyond the Green promoted through the Call for considered Belt. The site promoters consider that the site is no longer Sites on behalf of the landowner, achievable. suitable or viable for ongoing employment use. The site is it is currently designated as an 07/002 Anstey Silkmead Farm 2.7 however entirely separate from any existing settlement and Employment Area and is No No No No as such is considered to be an unsustainable location for therefore not considered to be residential development. currently available.

Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha threshold as identified by national policy. 08/001 Ardeley Kingswick 0.19

N - This greenfield site is located to west of Buntingford, Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is The site is immediately north of an allocated employment area. It is through the Call for Sites by the considered considered considered that the site would be deliverable for landowner and is considered achievable. deliverable for Land north of employment use subject to an extension of the existing available. employment 09/001 Aspenden Buntingford 2.8 employment area. This is proposed as part of the emerging uses subject to a Business Park District Plan. review of the Green Belt.

Y – This former orchard is located in the Green Belt on the Y - The Call for Sites form has Y – Site is Up to 10 edge of Aston, a Group 2 village. The site is surrounded by been submitted on behalf of six considered dwellings development on three sides and is therefore likely to be landowners. It is therefore achievable. considered appropriate for limited infill development. considered that the site is The site is 10/001 Aston Palletts Orchard 0.44 available. considered deliverable

N – This large greenfield site is located in the Green Belt to Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is the north of Aston. Development would not represent infill through the Call for Sites by the considered development in a Group 2 village and could not come landowner and is considered achievable. 10/002 Aston Coppers Field 3.04 forward through a Neighbourhood Plan due to its location in available. No No No No the Green Belt, and as such is considered unsuitable.

N – This greenfield site is located in the Green Belt to the Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is west of Aston. Development would not represent infill through the Call for Sites by the considered development in a Group 2 village and could not come landowner and is considered achievable. 10/003 Aston Little Orchard 0.48 forward through a Neighbourhood Plan due to its location in available. No No No No the Green Belt, and as such is considered unsuitable.

N – This greenfield site is located in the Green Belt to the Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is west of Aston. Development would not represent infill through the Call for Sites by the considered development in a Group 2 village and could not come landowner and is considered achievable. forward through a Neighbourhood Plan due to its location in available. 10/004 Aston Lammas Cut 0.29 the Green Belt, and as such is considered unsuitable. No No No No Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N – This greenfield site is poorly related to either Stevenage Y - The site has been promoted Y - The site is The site could or Aston End and lies within the Green Belt. It is therefore through the Call for Sites by the considered to be form part of a unsuitable at present when considered in isolation. landowner and is considered achievable at larger strategic However, the site does relate well to other SLAA sites available. present. scale further north, and there may be potential for strategic scale However, in development in development, including necessary services and facilities, order to deliver a this location which would relate well to Stevenage. strategic scale of subject to a development, review of the major Green Belt. infrastructure 10/006 Aston Land at Aston End 9.7 would be required. Further work would therefore be required to assess achievability.

N - This greenfield site is located in the Green Belt adjacent Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is to Gresley Way and the built up area of Stevenage. The site through the Call for Sites by the considered would have to be accessed from Gresley Way. However, at landowner and is considered achievable. present there is landscaped banking and mature tree available. 10/007 Aston Weavers Field 1.3 growth which screens views of the urban area of Stevenage No No No No from open countryside. On this basis the site is considered to be unsuitable.

Land to the rear of Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha threshold as 11/001 Bayford 4-6 Ashendene 0.18 identified by national policy. Road Y– This site is located within the Green Belt and is currently Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is The site is in authorised Gypsy and Traveller use. The site is in a rural through the Call for Sites by the considered considered location which is remote from local services and is therefore landowner and is considered to achievable. deliverable for Land at The considered to be an unsustainable location for future be available. Gypsy and 11/003 Bayford 0.28 No No No Stables general needs housing. However it is suitable for an Traveller use expansion for Gypsy and Travellers.

N – This large greenfield site is located within the Green Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Belt. Any development would be an incursion into open through the Call for Sites by the considered Land at High Trees 12/001 Bengeo Rural 22.12 countryside and, as such, is considered to be unsuitable. landowner and is considered to achievable. No No No No Farm be available. Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N - This greenfield site is located within the Rural Area Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Up to 10 Beyond the Green Belt to the south west of Tonwell, a through the Call for Sites by the considered dwellings Group 2 village. While the site would not constitute infill landowner and is considered to achievable. development, it could come forward if identified through a be available. The site is Neighbourhood Plan. considered deliverable Land at Bourne subject to a 12/002 Bengeo Rural 0.41 Honour review of the settlement boundary through a Neighbourhood Plan

N – This large greenfield site is located within the Green Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Belt. Any development would be an incursion into open through the Call for Sites by the considered Land rear of 12/003 Bengeo Rural 0.32 countryside and, as such, is considered to be unsuitable. landowner and is considered to achievable. No No No No Dormers be available.

N – This greenfield site lies within the Rural Area Beyond Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Up to 10 the Green Belt, in a Group 2 village. Whilst reasonably well through the Call for Sites by the considered dwellings related to the existing built up area of Benington, this is a landowner and is considered to achievable. relatively large site and its development would be out of be available. The site is scale with the form and character of the village. However, considered development of part of the site could be suitable if identified deliverable through a Neighbourhof Plan for Benington. subject to a Land west & north review of the 13/001 Benington of Oak Tree 1.74 settlement Surgery boundary through a Neighbourhood Plan for Benington.

N – This greenfield site lies within the Rural Area Beyond Y - Site has been promoted Y – Site is the Green Belt, to the west of Hebing End. Development on through the Call for Sites considered the edge of this Group 3 settlement would result in an process. Site is in multiple land achievable. unacceptable incursion into the countryside. As such, the ownership within same family Land west of 22 13/002 Benington 0.31 site is considered unsuitable. with intentions known. Site is No No No No Burns Green considered available for development. Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N - This greenfield site is located within the Rural Area Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Up to 9 dwellings Beyond the Green Belt, to the south of Town Lane, through the Call for Sites by the considered Benington. Although the site would not represent infill landowner and is considered to achievable. The site is development in a Group 2 village, the site could be brought be available. considered forward if identified within a Neighbourhood Plan. deliverable subject to a review of the Land west of 90 settlement 13/003 Benington 0.34 No No No Town Lane boundary through a Neighbourhood Plan for Benington.

N – This greenfield site lies within the Rural Area Beyond Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is the Green Belt, to the west of Hebing End. Development on through the Call for Sites by the considered the edge of this Group 3 settlement would result in an landowner and is considered to achievable. Land south of 2A unacceptable incursion into the countryside. As such, the be available. 13/004 Benington Whempstead 0.36 No No No No site is considered unsuitable. Road

Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha threshold as identified by national policy. Land east of 25 13/005 Benington 0.14 Hebing End

N – This greenfield site lies within the Rural Area Beyond Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is the Green Belt, to the west of Hebing End. Development on through the Call for Sites by the considered Land north of 68 the edge of this Group 3 settlement would result in an landowner and is considered to achievable. 13/006 Benington Whempstead 0.84 unacceptable incursion into the countryside. As such, the be available. No No No No Road site is considered unsuitable.

N – This brownfield site lies within the Rural Area Beyond Y - Site is in multiple ownership. Y – Site is the Green Belt. Previously in use as a chalk pit and However it has been promoted considered pumping station, the site is located within the Benington for development by the achievable. Conservation Area. This site is heavily covered by mature landowner through the Call for Land at the Old tree coverage and topographically constrained due to the Sites and is therefore considered 13/008 Benington 0.34 No No No No Chalk Pit height difference of the site and the road. Development on available for development. this site is not considered to relate well to the built up area and is therefore considered unsuitable for development.

Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha threshold as identified by national policy. 13/009 Benington Whitehall Stables 0.17 Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N - Site is predominantly a greenfield site containing Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is disused sheds along the north-west boundary of the site. through the Call for Sites by the considered Site is located within the Green Belt in a rural setting with landowner and is considered to achievable. Land north of High limited access to local services. Site is not considered to be be available. 13/010 Benington 0.74 No No No No Elms Lane located in a sustainable location and is therefore considered unsuitable for development.

Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha threshold as identified by national policy. Land adjacent to 13/011 Benington 0.17 Frogmore Lodge

Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha threshold as identified by national policy. 13/012 Benington Holbrook Barns 0.22

N - This greenfield site is located within the Rural Area Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Up to 10 Beyond the Green Belt, to the south of Town Lane, through the Call for Sites by the considered dwellings Benington. Although the site would not represent infill landowner and is considered to achievable. development in a Group 2 village, the site could be brought be available. The site is forward if identified within a Neighbourhood Plan. considered deliverable subject to a Land adjacent to 13/013 Benington 0.77 review of the The Bell PH settlement boundary through a Neighbourhood Plan for Benington.

N - This greenfield site is located within the Rural Area Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Up to 10 Beyond the Green Belt, to the west of Walkern Road, through the Call for Sites by the considered dwellings Benington. Although the site would not represent infill landowner and is considered to achievable. development in a Group 2 village, the site could be brought be available. The site is forward if identified within a Neighbourhood Plan. considered deliverable subject to a Front paddock on review of the 13/018 Benington 1.25 Walkern Road settlement boundary through a Neighbourhood Plan for Benington. Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N – This greenfield site lies within the Rural Area Beyond Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Up to 30 the Green Belt, adjacent to existing development on through the Call for Sites by the considered dwellings Pelham Road and opposite the existing housing on Friars landowner and is considered to achievable. Road. The site is relatively large although it does have a be available. The site is reasonable relationship with the existing built up area of considered Braughing. Potential access can be achieved from Pelham deliverable Road. The site has surface water flooding issues towards subject to an its northern boundary. Development of part of the site may amendment to 15/001 Braughing Arden Meadow 1.71 be considered appropriate with careful layout in keeping the village with the surrounding area without having an adverse impact boundary through visually. However the site is currently outside of the village a Neighbourhood boundary and is therefore currently unsuitable. Plan for Braughing.

N – This greenfield site lies within the Rural Area Beyond Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is the Green Belt, between Braughing and Hay Street. through the Call for Sites by the considered Development in this location would represent an landowner and is considered to achievable. Land east of unacceptable extension of ribbon development in a rural be available. 15/002 Braughing 0.83 No No No No B1368 setting. Remote from Braughing and its local services the site is considered to be an unsustainable location for development.

N - This greenfield site lies within the Rural Area Beyond Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is the Green Belt. Development of the site would be out of through the Call for Sites by the considered scale with the character of the existing village. Although the landowner and is considered to achievable. site lies adjacent to the village boundary, it cannot be be available. described as being within the built up area of the village. The site is part of the open countryside, traversed by public Land off Green footpaths, and separates the village from the isolated ribbon 15/003 Braughing End & Gravelly 1.61 development to the north. To connect the two would involve No No No No Lane an unacceptable incursion into countryside, which forms an important setting for the village. An outline application for 60 houses (3/14/1448/OP) was refused, a public inquiry has taken place and the appeal has been dismissed. Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N - This large greenfield site lies within the Rural Area Y - Site has been promoted Y – Site is Beyond the Green Belt. Development of the site would be through the call for sites process. considered out of scale with the charcter of the existing village. Planning application indicates achievable. Although the site lies adjacent to the village boundary, it the site owners intentions. Site is cannot be described as being within the built up area of the therefore considered available. village. The site is part of the open countryside, traversed by public footpaths, and separates the village from the Land off Green 15/004 Braughing 6.7 isolated ribbon development to the north. To connect the No No No No End two would involve an unacceptable incursion into countryside, which forms an important setting for the village. An outline application for 60 houses (3/14/1448/OP) was refused, a public inquiry has taken place and the appeal has been dismissed.

N – The site is contained and is relatively well related to the Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Up to 18 existing settlement. It could be suitable for development but through the Call for Sites by the considered dwellings at present is located within the Rural Area Beyond the landowner and is considered to achievable. Green Belt. be available. The site is considered deliverable subject to an Land north of 21 amendment to 15/005 Braughing 0.73 Green End the village boundary through a Neighbourhood Plan for Braughing.

N – This site is located on the western side of Braughing, Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Up to 8 dwellings adjacent to the settlement boundary. The site is well related through the Call for Sites by the considered to the existing settlement. However, at present is located landowner and is considered to achievable. The site is within the Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt. be available. considered deliverable subject to an amendment to Land to the rear of 15/007 Braughing 0.33 the village Chesnuts boundary through a Neighbourhood Plan for Braughing. Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N – This very large greenfield site is located within the Rural Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Area Beyond the Green Belt to the north of Braughing. through the Call for Sites by the considered Development of the site would be totally out of scale with landowner and is considered to achievable. the existing village and contrary to the Council’s policy to be available. allow some limited development in sustainable villages. The site is part of the open countryside, traversed by public Land west of footpaths, and separates Braughing from the hamlet of Hay 15/016 Braughing 36 No No No No Station Road Street to north. To connect the two would involve an unacceptable incursion into open countryside, which forms an important setting for the village. The site is not considered suitable for future housing development.

N – This greenfield site is located within the Rural Area Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Beyond the Green Belt to the north of Braughing. The site through the Call for Sites by the considered falls within SLAA site ref 15/016. The site is part of the landowner and is considered to achievable. open countryside and is isolated from both Braughing to the be available. south and Hay Street to the north. The site is in a rural Land west of 15/019 Braughing 2.49 location which is remote from local services and is therefore No No No No Station Road considered to be an unsustainable location for future housing development.

N- This large green field site is located to the north of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Puckeridge in the Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt, an through the Call for Sites by the considered Land north-east of Area of Archaeological Significance and within a Scheduled landowner and is considered to achievable. 15/020 Braughing Puckeridge (east 6.1 Monument. The site is located away from the built up area be available. No No No No of Wickham Hill) of the village, in open countryside. The site does not have direct access. Constrained by both its unsustainable location and topography the site is considered unsuitable Nfor - development.Located on Pump Hill, the site is surrounded by low Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Up to 5 dwellings density residential development. There is currently no direct through the Call for Sites by the considered access to the site. Access may be constrained by TPO's landowner and is considered to achievable. The site is along the eastern boundary. The site is well related to be available. cosnidered existing development and is likely to be considered infill. deliverable However at present the site is unsuitable as it is located subject to being Land adjacent to 16/001 Brent Pelham 0.31 within the Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt. identified within a Pumphill Cottage Neighbouhood Plan for Brent Pelham.

Site not assessed as permission has been granted and Brickendon 17/001 Birch Farm 1.09 development is complete. Liberty Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N - This is a large greenfield site located within the Green Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Belt, to the south of Hertford. It is located between the through the Call for Sites by the considered railway line and Brickendon Lane. There is potential for landowner and is considered to achievable. development to have a negative impact on Brickendonbury. be available. Brickendon Land west of Development would represent an unacceptable incursion 17/002 24.89 No No No No Liberty Brickendon Lane into open countryside, impacting on the openness of the Green Belt in this location. As such the site is considered unsuitable for future housing development.

Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha threshold as Land at Brickendon identified by national policy. 17/003 Brickendon 0.17 Liberty Grange Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha threshold as Land adjacent to identified by national policy. 18/001 Buckland 0.155 'Habitat'

N – This is an isolated site located within the Rural Area Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Beyond the Green Belt. Surrounded by open fields and a through the Call for Sites by the considered handful of farm house residences, the site is accessed via a landowner and is considered to achievable. narrow road. There is a history of refused and withdrawn be available. planning applications on the site including for an agricultural barn to house a herd of Alpacas. The southern edge of the 19/001 Cottered Trinity Meadow 2.18 site lies in Flood Zone 3. Given that the site is in a rural No No No No location which is remote from local services it is therefore considered to be an unsustainable location for future housing development.

N – This large greenfield site is located within the Rural Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Up to 10 Area Beyond the Green Belt. Development of the whole site through the Call for Sites by two considered dwellings would be inapproriate. However, the northern part of the landowners and is considered to achievable. site is well related to existing development. Although it be available. The site is would not represent infill development in a Group 2 village, considered the site could be brought forward if identified within a deliverable Neighbourhood Plan. subject to a Land to the rear of review of the 19/002 Cottered Peasecroft & The 12.94 No No settlement No Crescent boundary through a Neighbourhood Plan for Cottered. Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N – This site lies within the Rural Area Beyond the Green Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Up to 5 dwellings Belt, partly within an Area of Archaeological Significance through the Call for Sites by the considered and within the Cottered Conservation Area. Warren Lane is landowner and is considered to achievable. The site is a narrow road with farm houses on both sides. The site be available. considered 19/003 Cottered The Paddock 0.45 could be considerd as infill in a Group 2 village, and as deliverable such, is considered to be suitable.

Site not assessed as permission has been granted and Land at Stocking development is complete. 19/004 Cottered 0.34 Hill Lane

N – This greenfield site is located within the Rural Area Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Up to 10 Beyond the Green Belt. Development of the whole site through the Call for Sites by the considered dwellings would be inapproriate. However, part of the site is well landowner and is considered to achievable. related to existing development. Although it would not be available. The site is represent infill development in a Group 2 village, the site considered could be brought forward if identified within a deliverable Land Between Old Neighbourhood Plan. subject to a 19/005 Cottered Rectory and 2.092 review of the Magpie Farm settlement boundary through a Neighbourhood Plan for Cottered.

N - While it is well related to existing development, Bulls Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Green is a Group 3 village in the Green Belt which is an through the Call for Sites by the considered unsustainable location for future housing development. landowner and is considered to achievable. 20/001 Datchworth Home Farm 0.48 No No No No be available.

N - Site is a previously developed site but is currently in N - Site is currently in Y – Site is commerical use. The site is also within the Green Belt and employment use and is not considered is detached from the main built up area of Datchworth. It is considered to be available at achievable. therefore in an unsustainable location for future housing present. However the site has 20/002 Datchworth Pound Farm 0.78 development. been promoted by the No No No No landowners through the Call for Sites process.

N - Site is within the Green Belt. While it is well related to N - The southern part of the site Y - Site is existing development, Burnham Green is a Group 3 village is currently in use as a site for considered Land between 67 which is an unsustainable location for future housing mobile homes and so is not achievable. 20/003 Datchworth & 75 Burnham 1.32 development. considered to be currently No No No No Green Road available. Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N – This large greenfield site is located in the Green Belt N - The site was not submitted Y – Site is adjacent to the main built up area of Datchworth. through the Call for Sites and it considered Development would not represent infill development in a is therefore not known whether achievable. Land at Hawkins 20/009 Datchworth 20 Group 2 village and could not come forward through a the site is available. No No No No Hall Lane Neighbourhood Plan due to its location in the Green Belt, and as such is considered unsuitable.

N – This large greenfield site is located in the Green Belt Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is adjacent to the main built up area of Datchworth, a Group 2 through the Call for Sites by the considered village. Although the site is adjacent to the main built up landowner and is considered to achievable. area of the village the scale of development proposed be available. would be inappropriate, representing an unacceptable intrusion into the openness of the Green Belt. This site is Land to the north therefore considered unsuitable for development. A smaller 20/010 Datchworth of Turkey Farm 4.12 scale of development maybe more acceptable in Green No No No No Recreation Area Belt terms, however it would not consitute infil development in a Group 2 village and could not come forward through a Neighbourhood Plan due to its location in the Green Belt.

N - Site is within the Green Belt. Development would Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is involve the consolidation of existing ribbon development through the Call for Sites by the considered away from the main part of the village. Previous landowner and is considered to achievable. applications for residential development in this location be available. Land at 111 have been refused. Burnham Green is a Group 3 village in 20/011 Datchworth Burnham Green 2.5 No No No No the Green Belt which is an unsustainable location for future Road housing development.

N – This large greenfield site is located in the Green Belt. It Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is is poorly related to the main built up area of the village and through the Call for Sites by the considered the scale of development proposed would be inappropriate, landowner and is considered to achievable. representing an unacceptable intrusion into the openness of be available. the Green Belt. Development would not represent infill Land at Hawkings development in a Group 2 village and could not come 20/012 Datchworth 4.75 No No No No Hall Farm forward through a Neighbourhood Plan due to its location in the Green Belt, and as such is considered unsuitable. Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N – The site is located within the Green Belt and is currently Y - The site has been promoted Y - It is The site is used as stables. There are existing residential dwellings to through the Call for Sites by the considered that unsuitable when the south-eastern part of the site, while there is an upward landowner and is considered to the site is considered in slope on its northern part. Although the site has direct be available. achievable. isolation. access and lies close to existing development, Gilston is a However, it is However, it Group 3 village and is therefore considered to be an likely that could form part unsustainable location for further non-strategic significant of a much larger development. There is however potential for the site to form infrastructure strategic scale Eastwick & Fiddlers Brook 21/001 2.29 part of a much larger strategic site to the north of Harlow. would be development to Gilston Stables required which the north of would impact on Harlow subject viability. to a review of the Green Belt

N - There are a number of constraints on site including Y - The site has been promoted Y - It is The site could Areas of Archealogical Significance and Wildlife Sites. It is through the Call for Sites by the considered that provide strategic likely however that, given the size of the site, impacts on landowner and is considered to the site is scale these areas could be mitigated through careful design. The be available. achievable. development, south western part of the site lies within Flood Zones 2 and However, it is either in 3 which would constrain the developable area. The site likely that isloation or as Redricks, could provide strategic scale development, either in significant part of a wider Eastwick & Hollingson Meads, isolation or as part of a wider scheme involving infrastructure scheme, to the 21/002 136.29 Gilston Sayes Park, neighbouring sites. However, the site is within the Green would be north of Harlow Gilston Park (part) Belt and is therefore currently unsuitable. required which subject to a would impact on review of the viability. Green Belt

N - There are a number of constraints on site including Y - The site has been promoted Y - It is The site could Areas of Archealogical Significance and Wildlife sites. It is through the Call for Sites by the considered that provide strategic likely however that, given the size of the site, impacts on landowner and is considered to the site is scale these areas could be mitigated through careful design. The be available. achievable. development, southern part of the site lies within Flood Zones 2 and 3 Development in either in which would constrain the developable area. The site could this location has isloation or as provide strategic scale development, either in isolation or as been assessed part of a wider Land north of Eastwick & part of a wider scheme involving neighbouring sites. through the scheme, to the 21/004 A414/Eastwick 1015.41 Gilston However, the site is within the Green Belt and is therefore Delivery Study north of Harlow, Road currently unsuitable. and is subject to a considered to be review of the viable. Green Belt Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N - This Green Belt site is designated as an Area of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Archaeological Significance. Whilst located adjacent to through the Call for Sites by the considered Terlings Park, the site is separated from SLAA sites to the landowner and is considered to achievable. Land adjacent and north by the A414 and appears isolated and unrelated to be available. Eastwick & 21/005 to the rear of The 0.81 existing development and facilities. The site is therefore No No No No Gilston Dusty Miller PH considered to be an unsuitable location for development.

N - This Green Belt site is designated as an Area of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Archaeological Significance. Gilston Park House is also a through the Call for Sites by the considered Grade 2* listed building and any development in this landowner and is considered to achievable. Land south of Eastwick and location would have a significant impact on its setting. The be available. 21/006 Gilston Park 8.02 No No No No Gilston site is therefore considered to be an unsuitable location for House development.

The site is largely within Flood Zones 2 and 3 which would Y - The site has been promoted Y - It is The site is constrain the developable area and result in isolated through the Call for Sites by the considered that unsuitable when development. The site could provide strategic scale landowner and is considered to the site is considered in development, either in isolation or as part of a wider be available. achievable. isolation. scheme involving neighbouring sites. However, the site is However, it is However, it within the Green Belt and is therefore unsuitable likely that could form part significant of a much larger Land south of infrastructure strategic scale Eastwick & 21/009 Eastwick Road & 113.35 would be development to Gilston Redricks Lane required which the north of would impact on Harlow subject viability. to a review of the Green Belt

Y – This greenfield site is located in the Rural Area Beyond Y - The site has been promoted Y - It is the Green Belt, within Furneux Pelham, a Group 2 village. through the Call for Sites by the considered that Although well related to the existing built up area, there is landowner and is considered to the site is Furneux Land north of Lake no direct access to the site. The site is covered by mature be available. achievable. 22/001 0.31 No No No No Pelham Villas trees and development would impact negatively on the character of the village.

N - Site is a greenfield site, located within the Rural Area Y - The site has been promoted Y - It is Beyond the Green Belt, to the east of Furneux Pelham. through the Call for Sites by the considered that Located adjacent to a Grade II listed building, the site is landowner and is considered to the site is bounded by heavy foliage without direct access into it. The be available. achievable. Furneux 22/002 Hollybush 0.26 site is divorced from the main settlement and local services No No No No Pelham and facilities and is therefore considered to be an unsustainable location for future housing development. Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N – This greenfield site is located within the Rural Area Y - The site has been promoted Y - It is Up to 9 dwellings Beyond the Green Belt, to the south of Barleycroft End, through the Call for Sites by the considered that Furneux Pelham. The site is located adjacent to the landowner and is considered to the site is The site is settlement boundary. As such limited development in this be available. achievable. deliverable location come forward if the site is identified in a subject to a Neighbourhood Plan review of the settlement boundary through Furneux Land at Violets 22/003 0.37 a Neighbourhood Pelham Lane Plan for Furneux Pelham.

N – This brownfield site is located within the Rural Area Y - The site has been promoted Y - It is Beyond the Green Belt, an Area of Archaeological through the Call for Sites by the considered that Significance and the Furneux Pelham Conservation Area. landowner and is considered to the site is The site partially serves as an access to adjacent buildings be available. achievable. and to a storage and employment site on the southern part of the site. The site is located outside of the main built up area. Whilst there is scope for infill development in Group 2 Furneux Land at Tinkers 22/004 0.25 villages, the site forms part of a wider gap which is No No No No Pelham Hill important to the setting of the village. Planning permission for the demolition of a Dutch barn and erection of 3 dwellings has previously been refused (ref. 3/10/1838/FP). As such the site is considered unsuitable for development.

This site has not been assessed as it has been confirmed as no longer being available. Land to the rear of 23/001 Great Amwell 0.65 The Brooms

N – This brownfield site is located within the Green Belt in Y - The site has been promoted Y - It is Great Amwell, a Group 2 Village. The site is currently in use through the Call for Sites by the considered that as a nursery with storage units. The site is fairly well landowner and is considered to the site is screened by mature hedgerows to the south and east of the be available. achievable. site. Development of a site of this size would be out of scale 23/002 Great Amwell Byfield Nursery 2.05 and character with the area and would impact on the No No No No openness of the Green Belt in this strategic gap. As such the site is considered unsuitable for housing development. Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

Y – This partially greenfield site is located in the Green Belt, Y - The site has been promoted Y - It is Up to 5 dwellings within the built up area of Stanstead Abbotts. The northern through the Call for Sites by the considered that part of the site is within a Local Wildlife Site. There is an landowner and is considered to the site is The site is existing depot located on the site; the SLAA site boundary be available. achievable. considered Land north of excludes the pumping station. The site is also located deliverable 23/003 Great Amwell 0.23 Jansus adjacent to a railway line where a buffer may be required. The site is potentially considered suitable for infill development.

N – This large greenfield site is located within the Green Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Belt, to the west of Great Amwell and east of the A10. The through the Call for Sites by the considered site lies in the strategic gap between the southern edge of landowner and is considered to achievable. Ware and the north side of Hoddesdon (2.4 km apart). be available. Large scale development in this location would represent a Land surrounding clear incursion into open countryside, impacting on the 23/004 Great Amwell Van Hages 39.49 openness of the Green Belt in this sensitive location and as No No No No Garden Centre such the site is considered unsuitable for development.

N - This greenfield site is located to the east of the A1170 Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is with access from Hilllside Lane. The site is located within through the Call for Sites by the considered the Green Belt and forms part of the strategic gap between landowner and is considered to achievable. Great Amwell and Stanstead Abbotts. As such the site is be available. considered unsuitable for residential development. 23/021 Great Amwell Hillside Farm 22.2 No No No No

N – This part brownfield/greenfield site is located within the Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Green Belt in Great Amwell, a Group 2 Village. through the Call for Sites by the considered Development of a site of this size would be out of scale and landowner and is considered to achievable. character with the area and would impact on the openness be available. Byfield Nursery & 23/022 Great Amwell 3.69 of the Green Belt in this strategic gap. As such the site is No No No No Landcroft considered unsuitable for housing development.

N – This large greenfield site is located within the Green Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Belt and its development would be totally out scale with the through the Call for Sites by the considered village. It would also involve an unacceptable intrusion into landowner and is considered to achievable. open countryside on the opposite side of the main road to be available. Land west of the village. It would be an isolated development and an London Road 25/001 Hertford Heath 5.46 intrusion into land, which forms part of a swathe of No No No No (opposite no's 87- agricultural land and is part of the open setting of the 119) village. There are TPOs on northern and eastern boundaries of site. Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N – This strategic greenfield site is located in the Green Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Belt to the north of the main built up area of Hertford Heath, through the Call for Sites by the considered Up to 40 a Group 1 village. Developing a large landowner and is considered to achievable. dwellings neighbourhood/settlement in this location would be totally be available. out of scale with the village and an unacceptable intrusion The site is into the openness of the Green Belt. However, the southern considered Land at Amwell part of the site could be considered suitable subject to a deliverable Place Farm (east 25/002 Hertford Heath 70.38 review of the Green Belt. subject to a & west of review of the Downfield Road) Green Belt through a Neighbourhood Plan for Hertford Heath.

N – This part greenfield/brownfield site is located in the Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Green Belt outside of the village boundary. Whilst the site through the Call for Sites by the considered has some existing dwellings on it, further intensification landowner and is considered to achievable. The Roundings would impact on the openness of the Green Belt in this be available. 25/003 Hertford Heath and land to the 1.7 location. As such the site is considered unsuitable for No No No No rear further residential development.

N - This is a very large site in the Green Belt. The site Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is promoter has suggested that it could be appropriate for a through the Call for Sites by the considered number of uses. However, there are a large number of landowner and is considered to achievable. constraints on the site. Part of it remains in use as a quarry, be available. and the workings and curtilage take up a considerable amount of land. Part of the site is also constrained by Flood Hertingfordbur Water Hall Quarry Zones 2 and 3 and the promoter advises that there are 26/001 128.5 No No No No y Complex lagoons on site. Further constraints include a Scheduled Ancient Monument, Tree Preservation Orders and Local Wildlife Sites. Given it's isolated location, it is considered that any development would represent an unacceptable incursion into open countryside.

N – This large greenfield site is located in the Green Belt to Y - The site has been promoted Y - It is The site could the east of Welwyn Garden City, north of the A414. The through the Call for Sites by the considered that provide strategic majority of the site is identified as an Area of Archaeological landowner and is considered to the site is scale Significance and there are a number of features of historic be available. achievable. development, importance in the locality. The area contains known Development in either in reserves of sand and gravel minerals which would need to this location has isloation or as be extracted prior to any development. The site is currently been assessed part of a wider Birchall Farm (land Hertingfordbur unsuitable; however, it offers the opportunity to provide a through the scheme, to the 26/003 north of Birchall 71.11 y sustainable urban extension to Welwyn Garden City in Delivery Study east of Welwyn Lane) conjunction with adjacent land in Welwyn Hatfield Borough, and is Garden City, subject to a review of the Green Belt. considered to be subject to a viable. review of the Green Belt Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N – This submission is made up of a number of large Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is greenfield sites within the Green Belt linking through the Call for Sites by the considered Hertingfordbury, Birch Green and Letty Green below the landowner and is considered to achievable. Old Coach Road and another two sites north of the A414. be available. The developer notes that the area could provide small-scale development in keeping with the character of the existing Hatfield Estate Hertingfordbur settlements. Development would not represent infill 26/004 (land surrounding 127.21 No No No No y development in a Group 2 village and could not come Munn's Farm) forward through a Neighbourhood Plan due to its location in the Green Belt, and as such is considered unsuitable.

N – This brownfield site is located within the Green Belt to Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is the east of Birch Green. The site is currently used for through the Call for Sites by the considered horticulture and storage. Development would not represent landowner and is considered to achievable. infill development in a Group 2 village and could not come be available. forward through a Neighbourhood Plan due to its location in Hertingfordbur New England 26/005 0.69 the Green Belt, and as such is considered unsuitable. No No No No y Nursery

N – This greenfield site is located in the Green Belt to the Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is west of Hertingfordbury, in close proximity to two Grade II through the Call for Sites by the considered Listed Buildings. Poorly related to the existing settlement, landowner and is considered to achievable. development in this location would represent an be available. unacceptable incursion into the countryside impacting on Hertingfordbur Land west of The the openness of the Green Belt. Development would not 26/006 3.8 No No No No y Bury Farm represent infill development in a Group 2 village and could not come forward through a Neighbourhood Plan due to its location in the Green Belt, and as such is considered unsuitable.

N – This part brownfield/greenfield site is located in the Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Green Belt to the west of Hertingfordbury, in close proximity through the Call for Sites by the considered to two Grade II Listed Buildings. Poorly related to the landowner and is considered to achievable. existing settlement, development in this location would be available. represent an unacceptable incursion into the countryside impacting on the openness of the Green Belt. Development Hertingfordbur Land east of The 26/007 1.8 would not represent infill development in a Group 2 village No No No No y Bury Farm and could not come forward through a Neighbourhood Plan due to its location in the Green Belt, and as such is considered unsuitable. Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N – This greenfield site is located in the Green Belt to the Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is north of Birch Green. To the east of the site lie two Grade II through the Call for Sites by the considered Listed Buildings. Development would not represent infill landowner and is considered to achievable. Land adjacent to development in a Group 2 village and could not come be available. Hertingfordbur 26/008 12 The Old Coach 0.6 forward through a Neighbourhood Plan due to its location in No No No No y Road the Green Belt, and as such is considered unsuitable.

N – This greenfield site is located in the Green Belt to the Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is north of Birch Green. Development would not represent infill through the Call for Sites by the considered development in a Group 2 village and could not come landowner and is considered to achievable. Hertingfordbur Land south of forward through a Neighbourhood Plan due to its location in be available. 26/009 0.57 No No No No y Beechleigh the Green Belt, and as such is considered unsuitable.

N – This greenfield site is located to the east of Staines Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Green. Staines Green is a Group 3 Village in the Green Belt through the Call for Sites by the considered Hertingfordbur Land to the East of and as such the site is considered unsuitable for landowner and is considered to achievable. 26/010 7 No No No No y Staines Green development. be available.

N – This large greenfield site is located in the Green Belt Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is around High Wych. There are a number of constraints on through the Call for Sites by the considered site including Areas of Archaeological Significance and landowner and is considered to achievable. Wildlife Sites. It is likely that, given the size of the site, be available. impacts on these areas could be mitigated through careful 27/002 High Wych Sayes Park Farm 169.98 design. However, this area will form a senstive strategic No No No No gap between High Wych and the Gilston Area development. As such, it is considered unsuitable.

N – This greenfield site lies to the south of High Wych. It Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is forms part of the strategic gap between the village and through the Call for Sites by the considered Land surrounding Sawbridgeworth and as such is considered unsuitable for landowner and is considered to achievable. 27/003 High Wych 6.81 No No No No High Wych Grange development. be available.

N – This greenfield site lies within the Green Belt. The N - The ownership of the site is Y - Site is northern part of the site is located in the High Wych not known. Site not considered considered Conservation Area and there are Listed Buildings nearby. to be available now. achievable. The site is surrounded by open land apart from a few buildings/structures to the north. Direct access to the site is currently provided from High Wych Lane, through a Land south of 27/004 High Wych 1.72 playground. This is a relatively large site, unrelated to the No No No No 'Bakers Farm' form and character of the village. Its development would be an incursion into land which forms part of the countryside and the visual setting for the village. As such is not considered suitable for development. Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N - This greenfield site is located within the Rural Area Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Beyond the Green Belt. Although relatively well related to through the Call for Sites by the considered existing development, Allen’s Green is a Group 3 village landowner and is considered to achievable. Land between and is therefore considered to be an unsustainable location be available. 27/008 High Wych 0.7 No No No No Andor & Elms for future housing development.

Y - Site is located within the Rural Area Beyond the Green Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Site is Belt and in Flood Zone 3. Site is proposed for through the Call for Sites by the considered considered leisure/recreational use. Planning permission landowner and is considered to achievable for deliverable for (3/09/0352/FP) previously granted for a football pitch and be available. Planning leisure/recreation Leisure/Recreati Field 2769, land car parking. Site is therefore considered suitable for permission (3/09/0352/FP) use. on use 28/001 Hormead 0.9 south of B1038 leisure/recreational use. previously granted for a football pitch and car parking.

N – This predominantly greenfield site is located within Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt. This is a relatively large through the Call for Sites by the considered site and its development would be out of scale with the landowner and is considered to achievable. existing village. Whilst development would link the school be available. Land to rear & east and the main built up area of the village, it is unlikely that it 28/002 Hormead of Hormead C of E 3.63 would be considered infill in a Group 2 village. No No No No Primary School Development would be an unacceptable intrusion into the countryside setting of the village.

N - This partially brownfield site is located within the Rural Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Area Beyond the Green Belt, adjacent to the Great through the Call for Sites by the considered Hormead Conservation Area. The northern part of the site landowner and is considered to achievable. is open land and a brick grain store, which is currently be available. Land west of unused, is located on the southern boundary of the site. 28/003 Hormead Hormead Village 0.89 Site slopes gradually to the north. Whilst the site is well No No No No Hall located adjacent to the built up area, it is unlikely that it would be considered infill in a Group 2 village

N - This greenfield site is located within the Rural Area Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Beyond the Green Belt. Located to the rear of existing through the Call for Sites by the considered residential development, there is no direct access. There is landowner and is considered to achievable. pedestrian access to the south-east boundary of the site; be available. Land to rear of however, further highways work would be necessary. Whilst 28/004 Hormead 1.28 No No No No Jubilee Cottages the site is located adjacent to the built up area, it is unlikely that it would be considered infill in a Group 2 village Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N – This isolated brownfield site is located within the Rural N - Whilst the site has been Y - Site is Area Beyond Green Belt. The site is currently in B2 and B8 promoted through the Call for considered use, although not designated as an Employment Area in the Sites process, site is currently in achievable. Local Plan. Given that the site is in a rural location which is employment use and is not remote from local services it is considered to be an considered available. 28/005 Hormead Land at Lamorna 1.03 unsustainable location for future housing development. It is No No No No also important to ensure that local employment sites are not lost to housing to ensure a balanced community.

N – This large greenfield site is located to the west of Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Up to 30 Hunsdon, a Group 1 village. The south western section of through the Call for Sites by the considered dwellings the site lies within a County Wildlife Site. While landowner and is considered to achievable. development of the entire site would be completely out of be available. The site is scale with the character of the village, the south eastern considered section of the site could be suitable for small scale deliverable development. However, at present the site is unsuitable due subject to an Land west of Little 29/001 Hunsdon 28.95 to its location within the Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt. amendment to Samuel's Farm the village boundary through a Neighbourhood Plan for Hunsdon

N - This greenfield site is located within the Rural Area Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Beyond the Green Belt to the north of Hunsdon, a Group 1 through the Call for Sites by the considered village. The site is not well related to the existing settlement landowner and is considered to achievable. Land north of Little and development would result in an extension of ribbon be available. 29/002 Hunsdon 1.07 No No No No Samuel's Farm development into open countryside. The site is not considered to offer a suitable location for future development.

N - This brownfield site is located in the Rural Area Beyond N - While the site has been Y - Site is the Green Belt and is currently in various uses including promoted through the Call for considered employment, although not designated as an Employment Sites on behalf of the landowner, achievable. Up to 29 Area in the Local Plan. While the site lies outside of the it is currently in employment use dwellings identified village boundary, it is well related to the existing and is therefore not considered settlement and could offer the opportunity to provide small to be currently available. The site is scale development which may enhance the character of the considered village in this location. developable subject to an amendment to Little Samuel's 29/003 Hunsdon 1.14 the village Farm Estate boundary through a Neighbourhood Plan for Hunsdon and consideration of employment use. Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N - There are a number of constraints on site including Y - The site has been promoted Y - It is The site could Areas of Archealogical Significance and Wildlife sites. It is through the Call for Sites by the considered that provide strategic likely however that, given the size of the site, impacts on landowner and is considered to the site is scale these areas could be mitigated through careful design. The be available. achievable. development, site could provide strategic scale development, either in Development in either in isolation or as part of a wider scheme involving this location has isloation or as Eastern part of neighbouring sites. However, the site is within the Green been assessed part of a wider Briggens Estate 29/004 Hunsdon 114.43 Belt and is therefore currently unsuitable. through the scheme, to the (land east & west Delivery Study north of Harlow, of Eastwick Road) and is subject to a considered to be review of the viable. Green Belt

Site not assessed as permission has been granted and the principle of development is therefore accepted. Land south of Drury Lane & east 29/005 Hunsdon 0.41 of allotments (southern plot)

Site not assessed as permission has been granted and the principle of development is therefore accepted. Land south of 29/006 Hunsdon 0.33 Tanners Way

Site not assessed as permission has been granted and the principle of development is therefore accepted. Hunsdon Lodge 29/015 Hunsdon 0.36 Farm

N - This brownfield site lies within Rural Area Beyond the N - While the site has been Y - Site is Green Belt in the hamlet of Hunsdonbury, a Group 3 promoted through the Call for considered settlement. It is therefore considered to be unsuitable for Sites on behalf of the landowner, achievable. future housing development. There is a planning application development would result in the on the site awaiting decision on for the demolition of loss of a site that was peviosuly Land at Dixon's 29/017 Hunsdon existing dwellings and erection of 14 number of dwellings in employment use and therefore No No No No Crane Yard with garaging and landscaping (3/15/0260/FUL). is not considered to be currently available.

Site not assessed as permission has been granted and the principle of development is therefore accepted. 29/018 Hunsdon Land at Buryholme 0.42 Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N – The site lies in the Green Belt, in an isolated location on Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is the edge of Hunsdonbury. The site is a clearing within a through the Call for Sites by the considered woodland. To the east is Bury Plantation which is landowner and is considered to achievable. designated as a Wildlife Site. The site is predominantly be available. open. The site is submitted as part of a ‘linked hamlet’ concept. However this is not considered a sustainable Woodholme Stock 29/019 Hunsdon 2.81 approach for future housing development and would result No No No No Yard in isolated groupings of development with no supporting infrastructure/services. The site is considered unsuitable for future housing development.

Site not assessed as permission has been granted and the Land south of principle of development is therefore accepted. Drury Lane & east 29/020 Hunsdon 0.25 of allotments (northern plot)

N - This greenfield site is located on the southern edge of Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Up to 30 Hunsdon. The northern part of the site is in use as open through the Call for Sites by the considered dwellings space. While the remainder of the site is well related to the landowner and is considered to achievable. existing urban area, it is currently considered to be be available. The site is unsuitable as it is located within the Rural Area Beyond the considered Green Belt. deliverable subject to an Land at Hunsdon amendment to 29/021 Hunsdon (between B180 & 2.02 the village Acorn Street) boundary through a Neighbourhood Plan for Hunsdon.

N - This greenfield site is located within Hunsdon Parish, Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is immediately to the west of Briggens Park. While the site is through the Call for Sites by the considered located very close to the A414 it is not well connected to landowner and is considered to achievable. any existing settlement, the closest being Roydon within be available. Land adjacent to Epping Forest District. Given its relative isolation and the 29/022 Hunsdon 4.25 No No No No Briggens Hotel fact that the site lies within the Green Belt, it is not considered suitable for development.

N - The site is located within the Green Belt and is not Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is related to any existing settlement and development would through the Call for Sites by the considered result in an unacceptable incursion into the countryside. landowner and is considered to achievable. Little Brookside and the The site is therefore in an unsustainable location and is be available. 30/001 5.7 No No No No Berkhamsted Old Gravel Pit unsuitable for future development. Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N - This greenfield site is located within the Green Belt in Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Up to an Little Berkhamsted, a Group 2 village. While the site is through the Call for Sites by the considered additional 10 reasonably well related to the existing settlement, it could landowner and is considered to achievable. dwellings not be considered infill development. be available. The site is considered deliverable Little Land West of subject to an 30/002 2.9 No No No Berkhamsted Church Road amendment to the village boundary through a Neighbourhood Plan for Little Berkhamsted.

N - This greenfield site is located within the Green Belt in Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Up to an Little Berkhamsted, a Group 2 village. While the site is through the Call for Sites by the considered additional 10 reasonably well related to the existing settlement, it could landowner and is considered to achievable. dwellings not be considered infill development. be available. The site is considered deliverable subject to an Little Land East of 30/003 4.29 No No amendment to No Berkhamsted Church Road the village boundary through a Neighbourhood Plan for Little Berkhamsted.

N - This is a greenfield site located to the south of Stortford Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Road. The site is covered by an Area of Archaelogical through the Call for Sites by the considered Significance designation although it is likely that this could landowner and is considered to achievable. be mitigated. The site is not well related to the existing be available. Field 5155 (land settlement and development would represent an 31/001 Little Hadham south of Stortford 0.66 No No No No unacceptable extension to existing ribbon development. Road) This site is within the Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt and is therefore unsuitable. Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N - This is a very large greenfield site, consisting of a Y - The site has been promoted Y - The site is The site could number of open fields around the village of Little Hadham, through the Call for Sites by the considered to be form part of a a Group 2 village. Topographically the site varies, the landowner and is considered to achievable at larger strategic northern half of the site overlooks Little Hadham and is be available. present. scale highly visible from surrounding areas. The River Ash runs However, in development in through the site, along the eastern half on a north-south order to deliver a this location. axis. Along the line of the river, the site lies within Flood strategic scale of The site could Zone 3 with a risk of Surface Water Flooding although the development, be considered construction of the Little Hadham bypass ad associated major to be either flood alleviation measures should largely address this infrastructure deliverable or Land and buildings issue. While the site could form part of a larger strategic would be developable 31/002 Little Hadham 269.05 at Little Hadham scale of development in this location in the future, it is required. Further depending on currently considered to be unsuitable. work would the nature and therefore be scale of required to development. assess achievability.

N - This is a brownfield site located in Bury Green. The site N - While the site has been Y - Site is currently contains vacant offices and is identified in the promoted through the Call for considered Local Plan as a Major Developed Site. Planning permission Sites on behalf of the landowner, achievable. (3/07/1540/PD) for the demolition of these units was development would result in the granted in 2007 although this has not been implemented. loss of an employment site and Land at Bury 31/003 Little Hadham 3.35 The site is relatively well related to the existing settlement of therefore is not considered to be No No No No Green Farm Bury Green but, as this is a Group 3 village, the site is currently available. considered to be unsuitable for the scale of development envisaged.

N - This greenfield site is currently used as private garden Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is land for the occupiers to the east of the site. Access is an through the Call for Sites by the considered issue which would need to be overcome. In addition, the landowner and is considered to achievable. site is covered in mature trees which conribute to the be available. Land at rear of 31/004 Little Hadham 0.25 character of this part of the village. As such, it is not No No No No Florence Cottage considered that the site is suitable.

N - This is a greenfield site located within the Green Belt to Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is the north east of Bury Green. The site consists of an through the Call for Sites by the considered enclosed field bounded by mature hedgerow with direct landowner and is considered to achievable. access on the northern boundary of the site. A wildlife site be available. Paddock adjacent covers much of the site. Development in this isloated 31/005 Little Hadham 0.41 No No No No to Barrans location would result in an unacceptable incursion into the countryside, impacting on the openness of the Green Belt. The site is therefore considered to be unsuitable. Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

Y - This is a greenfield site located to the south of Stortford Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Up to 5 dwellings Up to an Road . The site consists of a flat, open field. The site is through the Call for Sites by the considered additional 12 constrained as it is located within Rural Area Beyond the landowner and is considered to achievable, Infill dwellings Green Belt. However, the site is located in close proximity be available. development in to local services and facilities. The site is regarded as infill accordance with The site is development and so is considered to be suitable for limited Group 2 village considered development in accordance with Group 2 village policy. policy deliverable Further development could be identified within a subject to an Land east of 31/006 Little Hadham 0.66 Neighbourhood Plan amendment to Ashcroft Farm the village boundary through a Neighbourhood Plan for Little Hadham.

Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha threshold as Field behind identified by national policy. 31/007 Little Hadham 0.18 Foxearth

N - This greenfield site is located within the Rural Area N - Land ownership and Y - Site is Beyond the Green Belt to the south of Stortford Road. The intentions for the site are considered site is not well related to the existing settlement and would unknown. achievable. represent an unacceptable incursion into the countryside. Land south of 31/024 Little Hadham 5.1 The site is therefore unsuitable for future development. No No No No Stortford Road

N - This part greenfield, part brownfield site is located within N - Site has been identified Y - The site is The site could the Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt. The northern half of through the Call for Sites considered to be form part of a the site is in industrial use while the southern half is process with land ownership and achievable at larger strategic greenfield, adjacent to the A120. There is direct access to intentions known. However, present. scale the industrial units via Church End, with no direct access to upper half of site is currently in However, in development in the southern half of the site. While development of the site employment use and is therefore order to deliver a this location. in isolation would be unacceptable, it could form part of a not considered available at the strategic scale of The site could larger strategic scale of development in this location in the present time development, be considered future. major to be either Hadham Industrial infrastructure deliverable or 31/025 Little Hadham Estate & Church 12.18 would be developable End Farm required. Further depending on work would the nature and therefore be scale of required to development. assess achievability. Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N - This is a brownfield site, located to the south of Hadham Y - The site has been promoted Y - In order to Ford within the Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt and through the Call for Sites by the bring this site within an Area of Archaelogical Significance. The site which landowner and is considered to forward is a disused pit is poorly related to Hadham Ford. be available. remediation of Development would represent an unacceptable incursion the site would be into the countryside in this location. required. 31/026 Little Hadham Land at Side Hilly 1.08 However without No No No No further information it is considered that the site is acheiveable.

N - This is a greenfield site located within the Rural Area Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Beyond the Green Belt. Development in this location would through the Call for Sites by the considered lead to a significant reduction in the gap between Little landowner and is considered to achievable. Hadham and Hadham Ford. The southern part of the site, be available. which is closest to existing development, lies within Flood Zone 3b. Development of the remaining part of the site, Land north of 31/027 Little Hadham 2.62 outside of Flood Zone 3b, would be unsuitable as it would No No No No Pathway Cottages be poorly related to the existing village. It is therefore considered to be unsuitable for future development.

N - This is a greenfield site located to the north of Little Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Up to 19 Hadham, within the Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt. through the Call for Sites by the considered dwellings There are a number of TPO designations along the western landowner and is considered to achievable. boundary of the site. It is relatively well related to the be available. The site is existing built up area of Little Hadham but does not considered constitute infill development in a Group 2 village and is deliverable therefore currently considered to be unsuitable. subject to an Land north of Development could be brought foward through a amendment to 31/028 Little Hadham 0.74 Stanemede Neighbourhood Plan. the village boundary through a Neighbourhood Plan for Little Hadham.

N - This is a greenfield site located within the Rural Area Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Beyond the Green Belt. Development in this location would through the Call for Sites by the considered lead to a significant reduction in the gap between Little landowner and is considered to achievable. Land south of The 31/029 Little Hadham 1.83 Hadham and Hadham Ford. The site is therefore be available. No No No No Smithy considered to be unsuitable for future development.

Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha threshold as Land adjacent to identified by national policy. 31/030 Little Hadham 0.2 Ashmeads Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N - This is a greenfield site currently in use as allotment N - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Up to 20 gardens within the Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt. It is through the Call for Sites by the considered dwellings located to the west of Much Hadham adjacent to the landowner, however it is achievable. Group 1 village development boundary and within an Area currently in use as allotments The site is of Archaelogical Significance. There is a proposal to re- and details of the proposed considered locate the allotments to the north of the site although no relocation are not clear. It is deliverable details are provided. Development of the site may be therefore considered that the site subject to an considered appropriate; however, the site is currently is not available at present. amendment to Land to west of 33/001 Much Hadham 0.79 outside of the village boundary. The site is therefore the village Hodge's Garage currently unsuitable. boundary through a Neighbourhood Plan for Much Hadham and relocation of the allotments.

This site has not been assessed as planning permission Land at Walnut 33/002 Much Hadham 0.23 has been granted. Close

N -This greenfield site lies to the south of Much Hadham, Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Up to 15 within the Conservation Area. While the site is seperated through the Call for Sites by the considered dwellings from the main built up area, and consequently the village landowner and is considered to achievable. boundary, the site could be brought forward through a be available. The site is review of the boundary. However, at present the site is considered unsuitable due to its location within the Rural Area Beyond deliverable the Green Belt. subject to an Land south of 33/004 Much Hadham 0.58 No No amendment to No Ashleys the village boundary through a Neighbourhood Plan for Much Hadham.

N - This is a large greenfield site adjacent to the Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Conservation Area. Access onto the site is through a through the Call for Sites by the considered narrow road. The site is unsuitable as it is within the Rural landowner and is considered to achievable. Dolan's Field (land Area Beyond the Green Belt, is poorly related to the existing be available. 33/005 Much Hadham north of New 4.49 settlement and would lead to an unacceptable incursion of No No No No Barns Lane) development into an open countryside location. Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N - This site lies to the south of Much Hadham and is Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Up to 30 adjacent to the Conservation Area. While the site is through the Call for Sites by the considered dwellings seperated from the main built up area of the village, and landowner and is considered to achievable. consequently the village boundary, it could be brought be available. The site is forward in conjunction with site 33/004 through a review of considered the village boundary. However, at present the site is deliverable unsuitable due to its location within the Rural Area Beyond subject to an Land at Barn the Green Belt. amendment to 33/012 Much Hadham 1.21 No No No Cottage the village boundary through a Neighbourhood Plan for Much Hadham.

N - This is a greenfield site located to the north- west of Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Up to 30 Much Hadham within the Rural Area Beyond the Green through the Call for Sites by the considered dwellings Belt. Development of the site may be considered landowner and is considered to achievable. appropriate subject to access issues; however, the site is be available. The site is currently outside of the village boundary. The site is considered therefore currently unsuitable. deliverable subject to an Land to the rear of 33/013 Much Hadham 1.36 amendment to North Leys the village boundary through a Neighbourhood Plan for Much Hadham.

N - This is a greenfield site within the Rural Area Beyond Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Up to 30 Green Belt which lies immediately to the west of site through the Call for Sites by the considered to be dwellings 33/013.While the site is seperated from the main built up landowner and is considered to achievable. area of the village, and consequently the village boundary, it be available. The site is could be brought forward in conjunction with site 33/013, considered subject to access issues, through a review of the village deliverable boundary. However, at present the site is unsuitable due to subject to an Land to the rear of 33/014 Much Hadham 1.47 its location within the Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt. No No amendment to No North Leys the village boundary through a Neighbourhood Plan for Much Hadham. Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N - This large greenfield site is located within the Rural Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Area Beyond the Green Belt to the west of Much Hadham. through the Call for Sites by the considered to be Although the site is adjacent to the main built up area of the landowner and is considered to achievable. village, achieving a suitable access may be an issue. The be available. scale of development proposed would be inappropriate, 33/015 Much Hadham Wheatcroft 11.17 representing an unacceptable incursion into the countryside No No No No setting of the village. The site is therefore considered to be unsuitable.

N - This greenfield site forms a small part of site 33/015. Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Up to 14 The site is well related to the existing built up area of the through the Call for Sites by the considered to be dwellings village, although achieving a suitable access may be an landowner and is considered to achievable. issue. At present the site is considered to be unsuitable due be available. Site considered to its location within the Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt. deliverable 33/015a Much Hadham Wheatcroft 0.57 subject to an amendment to the village boundary through a Neighbourhood Plan for Much Hadham. N - This is a greenfield site to the south-west of Much Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Up to 9 dwellings Hadham. It is largely covered with woodland although there through the Call for Sites by the considered are no TPO's on the site itself. The site is adjacent to the landowner and is considered to achievable Site considered existing village boundary and access could be achieved be available. deliverable from Millers View. Development of the site may be subject to an considered appropriate; however, the site is currently amendment to Former Hadham outside of the village boundary, within the Rural Area the village 33/016 Much Hadham 0.37 Station Beyond the Green Belt. The site is therefore currently boundary through unsuitable. a Neighbourhood Plan for Much Hadham.

N - This is a brownfield site currently in employment use. It N - While the site has been Y - Site is is located within the Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt, promoted through the Call for considered within a Group 3 settlement that has very limited access to Sites on behalf of the landowner, achievable local services and facilities. Therefore, while continued development would result in the A10 Timber employment use on site is considered appropriate, loss of an employment site and 35/001 Standon 1.74 No No No No Company residential redevelopment would be unsuitable. therefore is not considered to be currently available.

N - This is a greenfield site, adjacent to the village Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is boundary. While it is well related to the existing settlement, through the Call for Sites by the considered it is considered to be unsuitable as it lies within the Rural landowner and is considered to achievable. 35/002 Standon Burrs Meadow 0.48 Area Beyond the Green Belt and is currently designated as be available. No No No No protected open space. Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N - The majority of the site lies outside of the settlement Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Up to 2 dwellings Up to 12 boundary, within the Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt and, through the Call for Sites by the considered dwellings as a whole, is therefore considered to be unsuitable. It is, landowner and is considered to achievable. On part of site however, well related to the existing settlement. The be available. within settlement On site as a western part of the site is located within the settlement boundary whole, subject to boundary and is therefore considered to be deliverable. Any a review of the proposals would need to give consideration to the proximity village boundary 35/003 Standon Lilymead 0.47 of the site to the Conservation Area. through a Neighbourhood Plan for Standon and Puckeridge.

N - This is a large greenfield site, located immediately north Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Up to 146 of the A120, and reasonably well related to the existing through the Call for Sites by the considered dwellings settlement. While development of the entire site would be landowner and is considered to achievable. contrary to Group 1 village policy, it could enable the be available. Subject to a delivery of 10% growth within the village as envisaged by review of the the draft District Plan. However, at present the site is village boundary Land at Café Field considered to be unsuitable as it is located within the Rural through a 35/004 Standon (land north of 11.24 Area Beyond the Green Belt. The site is currently subject to Neighbourhood A120) Planning Application 3/15/2081/OUT for up to 205 Plan for Standon dwellings. and Puckeridge.

N - This is a greenfield site located in Colliers End. The site Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is is considered to be unsuitable as it is located within the through the Call for Sites by the considered Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt. While development on landowner and is considered to achievable. the edge of Group 2 villages can be delivered through be available. Land to rear of 35/005 Standon 2.93 Neighbourhood Plans, development of this site would lead No No No No Lamb and Flag PH to an unaccepable incursion into the countryside.

N - This site is located to the north of Colliers End. The site Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is is detached from the settlement and development would through the Call for Sites by the considered result in an unacceptable incursion into the countryside. As landowner and is considered to achievable. The such it is considered to be unsuitable. be available. demolition of existing units and Land south of 35/007 Standon 5.79 remediation of No No No No Dowsetts Lane the site would be required. Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N - This is a greenfield site located in Colliers End, a Group Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Up to 10 2 village. While located within the Rural Area Beyond the through the Call for Sites by the considered dwellings Green Belt, the site is located adjacent to existing landowner and is considered to achievable. development. Although it would not represent infill be available. The site is development in a Group 2 village, the site could be brought considered forward if identified within a Neighbourhood Plan. deliverable subject to an Land north of St 35/008 Standon 0.5 amendment to Mary's Church the settlement boundary through a Neighbourhood Plan for Standon.

Please note that these sites have not been assessed as Former Kerry 35/010 Standon 1.19 they are allocated employment sites. Foods site

Please note that these sites have not been assessed as 35/011 Standon Hopsons Site 0.93 they are allocated employment sites. Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha threshold as Land north of 35/012 Standon 0.06 identified by national policy. Barnacres

N - This is a greenfield site located in Colliers End. It is a Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Up to 10 large site, the majority of which would be inapproriate due through the Call for Sites by the considered dwellings to an unacceptable incursion into the countryside. However landowner and is considered to achievable. the south western parcel of the site is well related to be available. The site is existing development and could be brought forward for considered small scale development through a Neighbourhood Plan. deliverable subject to an amendment to 35/013 Standon Camps Field 5.63 the settlement boundary through a Neighbourhood Plan for Standon. Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N - This is a greenfield site located in Colliers End, a Group Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Up to 6 dwellings 2 village. While located within the Rural Area Beyond the through the Call for Sites by the considered Green Belt, the site is located adjacent to existing landowner and is considered to achievable. The site is development. Although it would not represent infill be available. considered development in a Group 2 village, the site could be brought deliverable forward if identified within a Neighbourhood Plan. subject to an Slaughterhouse/Or amendment to chard (land 35/014 Standon 0.25 No No the settlement No opposite St Mary's boundary through Church) a Neighbourhood Plan for Standon.

N - This site is located to the north of Colliers End. The site Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is is detached from the settlement and development would through the Call for Sites by the considered result in an unacceptable incursion into the countryside. As landowner and is considered to achievable. such it is considered to be unsuitable. be available. 35/015 Standon Ryders Mead 1.84 No No No No

N - The site consists of two distinct fields divided by a Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Up to 30 mature tree row which runs along the northern axis, both in through the Call for Sites by the considered dwellings agricultural use. The western field is partially located within landowner and is considered to achievable. Flood Zone 2 and is also at risk of surface water flooding. be available. Subject to a This part of the site also contains a Scheduled Ancient review of the Monument and is covered by an Area of Archaeological village boundary Land at Wickham Significance. Development of the entire site would lead to a through a 35/016 Standon 8.72 Hill scale of development that would be contrary to Group 1 Neighbourhood village policy, although a smaller scale of development Plan for Standon adjacent to existing development could be appropriate. The site is within the Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt and is therefore unsuitable.

N - This site is located within the Rural Area Beyond the Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Up to 23 Green Belt and partly within Flood Zone 2 and 3 with a risk through the Call for Sites by the considered dwellings of surface water flooding. In light of the recent appeal landowner and is considered to achievable. decision on land to the east of Cambridge Road, be available. Subject to a development of the site may be considered appropriate; review of the however, the site is currently outside of the village village boundary The Chestnuts & 35/017 Standon 0.9 boundary. The site is therefore currently unsuitable. through a Glanton Neighbourhood Plan for Standon. Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N - This site is located within the Rural Area Beyond the Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Green Belt. Any development in this location would through the Call for Sites by the considered represent an encroachment into the countryside. Bromley is landowner and is considered to achievable. Bromley Farm a Group 3 village with little or no access to services and be available. 35/018 Standon 0.33 No No No No Yard facilities and is considered to be an unsustainable location for development.

N - This is a greenfield site, located within the Rural Area Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Beyond the Green Belt. Latchford is a Group 3 village with through the Call for Sites by the considered Land west of very limited access to services and facilities and is therefore landowner and is considered to achievable. 35/019 Standon Arches Hall 1.09 considered to be an unsuitable location for development. be available. No No No No Cottages

N - This site is located within the Rural Area Beyond the N - The site was promoted Y - Site is Up to 30 Green Belt and partly within Flood Zone 2 and 3 with a risk through the previous Local Plan considered dwellings of surface water flooding. In light of the recent appeal process. It is unknown whether achievable. decision on land to the east of Cambridge Road, the site is still available. Subject to a development of the site may be considered appropriate; review of the Land west of however, the site is currently outside of the village village boundary 35/033 Standon 1.77 Cambridge Road boundary. The site is therefore currently unsuitable. through a Neighbourhood Plan for Standon.

Site not assessed as permission has been granted and the Land east of principle of development is therefore accepted. 35/034 Standon 1.98 Cambridge Road

N - This is a greenfield site located adjacent to Buntingford Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Road. The site is considered to be unsuitable as it is through the Call for Sites by the considered located within the Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt and is landowner and is considered to achievable. Land east of 35/036 Standon 0.53 identified as a Scheduled Monument. be available. No No No No Buntingford Road

N - This is a greenfield site located off Stortford Road within Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Up to 30 the Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt, adjacent to the through the Call for Sites by the considered dwellings existing settlement boundary. Development of the site may landowner and is considered to achievable. be considered appropriate; however, the site is currently be available. Subject to a outside of the village boundary. The site is therefore review of the currently unsuitable. village boundary Land Adjacent to through a 35/037 Standon 2.47 Stortford Road Neighbourhood Plan for Standon. Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N - This greenfield site is located within the Rural Area Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Beyond the Green Belt to the west of the A10. The site is through the Call for Sites by the considered considered to be unsuitable for development as it is isolated landowner and is considered to achievable. from the existing built up area of Puckeridge due to the be available. Land at Mentley 35/038 Standon 1.8 presence of the A10. In addition, part of the site is located No No No No Lane West within Flood Zone 3.

N - This is a greenfield site located outside of the village Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is boundary. The site is unsuitable as it is within the Green through the Call for Sites by the considered Kitten Hill (land Belt, is not well related to the existing settlement and landowner and is considered to achievable. Stanstead east of Hunsdon development would result in an unacceptable incursion into be available. 36/001 3.38 No No No No Abbotts Road & north of open countryside. Roydon Road)

N - The site is relatively well related to the existing Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is settlement. However it is unsuitable as it is located within through the Call for Sites by the considered the Green Belt and the Lee Valley Regional Park. It is also landowner and is considered to achievable. Stanstead Land north of 36/002 1.32 partly designated as Open Space and lies within Flood be available. No No No No Abbotts Marsh Lane Zones 2 and 3.

Y - This is a greenfield site within the Green Belt and the Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Site is Lee Valley Regional Park and has been proposed for use through the Call for Sites by the considered considered Land north of as a private marina. The site is considered suitable for the landowner and is considered to achievable. deliverable for Stanstead Marsh Lane 36/003 0.22 proposed use subject to an assessment of the potential be available. proposed use. Abbotts (adjacent to the impact on the wildlife site. Mill Stream)

Please note that this site has not been assessed as it is in Stanstead 36/006 David Websters 1.34 current employment use. Abbotts

N - This is a greenfield site located immediately to the south Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is of Stanstead Abbotts outside of the village boundary. While through the Call for Sites by the considered Land off the site is well related to the existing settlement it is landowner and is considered to achievable. Stanstead Netherfield Lane 36/007 1.35 unsuitable as it is within the Green Belt and the Lee Valley be available. No No No No Abbotts (north of David Regional Park. Websters)

N - This is a greenfield site currently in use as a private Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is garden with a tennis court and storage facilities on site. It is through the Call for Sites by the considered unsuitable as it is within the Green Belt, would result in an landowner and is considered to achievable. Stanstead Tennis Court, 1 unacceptable incursion into the countryside and is poorly be available. 36/008 0.91 No No No No Abbotts The Abbotts related to the existing settlement Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N - This is a part greenfield, part brownfield site with a N - Site has been identified Y - Site is residential care home, located to the north of the High through the 2007 Local Plan considered Street, immediately adjacent to residential development. process. It is not known whether achievable. While the site is relatively well related to the existing the land is still available. Stanstead Land at 36/016 0.94 settlement, it is unsuitable as it is located in the Green Belt No No No No Abbotts Willowthorpe and Lee Valley Regional Park and is also partly within Flood Zones 2 and 3.

N - This is a brownfield site located to the south of Marsh N - Site has been identified Y - Site is Lane which is currently in use as a nursery. While the site is through the 2007 Local Plan considered relatively well related to the existing settlement, it is process. It is not known whether achievable. The unsuitable as it is located in the Green Belt and Lee Valley the land is still available. demolition of Stanstead Regional Park and is also partly within Flood Zones 2 and existing units 36/017 Atkin Bros Nursery 1.2 No No No No Abbotts 3. would be required to redevelop this site.

N - This greenfield site is located on the edge of Stanstead Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Abbotts. The site is considered to be unsuitable as it is through the Call for Sites by the considered Up to 9 dwellings located within the Green Belt. However, as a Group 1 landowner and is considered to achievable. village the site could be delivered through a Neighbourhood be available. The site is Plan. considered deliverable subject to a Stanstead Land West of 36/018 0.34 No No review of the No Abbotts Chapelfields Green Belt through a Neighbourhood Plan for Stanstead Abbotts.

N - This is a greenfield site consisting of two large parcels Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is of land separated by the A414 located within the Green through the Call for Sites by the considered Belt. The site forms part of the strategic gap between the landowner and is considered to achievable. Stanstead St Land north and settlements of Hoddesdon, Stanstead St Margarets and be available. 37/001 45.8 No No No No Margarets south of A414 Great Amwell. As such the site is considered to be unsuitable.

N - This is a greenfield site which lies between the A10 and Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is the A1170 within the Green Belt. The site forms part of the through the Call for Sites by the considered strategic gap between the settlements of Hoddesdon, landowner and is considered to achievable. Stanstead St Land west of Ware Stanstead St Margarets and Great Amwell. As such the site be available. 37/002 18.03 No No No No Margarets Road is considered to be unsuitable. Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

Y - This is a greenfield site, the majority of which is within Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Up to 10 the settlement boundary and is therefore suitable. A small through the Call for Sites by the considered dwellings The Wilderness section of the site is located within Flood Zone 2. The landowner and is considered to achievable. Stanstead St (land between southern section of the site lies on the other side of the be available. On part of site 37/003 0.48 Margarets Hoddesdon Road A414, within the Green Belt, and is therefore unsuitable. within the & the New River) settlement boundary.

N - This is a brownfield site which lies between the A10 and Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is the A1170 within the Green Belt. The site contains derelict through the Call for Sites by the considered buildings relating to its former use as a nursery. The site landowner and is considered to achievable. forms part of the strategic gap between the settlements of be available. Demolition and Hoddesdon, Stanstead St Margarets and Great Amwell. As clearing of the such the site is considered to be unsuitable. existing units Stanstead St 37/004 Hillside Nursery 1.88 would be No No No No Margarets required and there is a potential need for remediation work.

N - This isolated site is located within the Green Belt, Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is adjacent to Hubbard's Wood Wildlife Site and within an through the Call for Sites by the considered Area of Archaelogical Significance. The site is unsuitable as landowner and is considered to achievable. it is within the Green Belt and in a rural location which is be available. 38/001 Stapleford Little Gobions 0.31 remote from local services. It is therefore considered to be No No No No an unsustainable location for future housing development.

N - This isolated site is located within the Green Belt, Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is adjacent to Hubbard's Wood Wildlife Site. The site is through the Call for Sites by the considered unsuitable as it is within the Green Belt and in a rural landowner and is considered to achievable. location which is remote from local services. It is therefore be available. 38/002 Stapleford Hubbards 0.43 considered to be an unsustainable location for future No No No No housing development.

N - This greenfield site is located adjacent to Tewin Cowper Y - The site is in the ownership Y - Site is Primary School. Part of the site is designated as open of a single landowner and has considered space and is currently in use as allotments. The site been promoted through the Call achievable. promoter has suggested that the southern part of the site for Sites. Part of the site is could be used to re-locate the allotments. However, while currently in use as allotments. Land adjacent to the site is reasonably well related to the existing settlement, However the rental agreement 40/001 Tewin Cowper C of E 1.49 it is considered to be unsuitable due to its location within the with the Parish Council can be No No No No School Green Belt. Development in this location would result in an terminated with 12 months notice unacceptable intrusion into the rural setting of the village. and there is potential to relocate the allotments to the southern part of the site. It is therefore considered that the site is available. Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N - This part greenfield, part brownfield site is poorly related Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is to the existing built up area of Tewin. There are a number through the Call for Sites by the considered of existing structures on the site which are not proposed for landowner and is considered to achievable. demolition which would constrain the developable area of be available. the site. Much of the site, including the entire boundary, is 40/002 Tewin Seven Acres 1.97 covered by a blanket Tree Preservation Order. The site is No No No No unsuitable as it is located within the Green Belt

N - This greenfield site is located east of Upper Green Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Road. While it is well related to the existing settlement the through the Call for Sites and is considered site is considered to be unsuitable due to its location within assumed to be available achievable. the Green Belt. In order for the site to come forward, the although the site is owned by Green Belt would need to be reviewed through the District more than one landowner. Land east of Upper Plan. The emerging Plan identifies Tewin as a Group 2 40/003 Tewin 1 No No No No Green Road village, wherein only limited infill development would be appropriate. This site would not constitute limited infill development.

N - This large greenfield site is located to the north of Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Tewin. The site is approximately 2 hectares in total through the Call for Sites by the considered although the site promoter has suggested that landowner and is considered to achievable. approximately 0.65 hectares could be suitable for be available. development. While the site is relatively well related to the existing settlement, it is considered to be unsuitable due to Land at junction of its location within the Green Belt. In order for the site to 40/004 Tewin Upper Green Road 2.23 come forward, the Green Belt would need to be reviewed No No No No & Tewin Hill through the District Plan. The emerging Plan identifies Tewin as a Group 2 village, wherein only limited infill development would be appropriate. This site would not constitute limited infill development.

N - This mainly greenfield site is located to the west of Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Tewin. While adjacent to the existing village boundary, the through the Call for Sites by the considered site is considered to be unsuitable as it is poorly related to landowner and is considered to achievable. the existing settlement, lies within the Green Belt and any be available. Land rear of 29 40/007 Tewin 0.91 development would represent an unacceptable incursion No No No No Upper Green Road into the countryside. Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N - This greenfield site is located east of Upper Green Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Road. While it is well related to the existing settlement the by the landowner through the considered site is considered to be unsuitable due to its location within Call Sites and is therefore achievable. the Green Belt. In order for the site to come forward, the considered to be available. Land east of Upper Green Belt would need to be reviewed through the District 40/008 Tewin 0.31 No No No No Green Road Plan. The emerging Plan identifies Tewin as a Group 2 village, wherein only limited infill development would be appropriate. This site would not constitute limited infill development.

N - This is a very large site to the south east of Tewin which Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is is owned by a number of different plot owners. The site is by a group of over 70 considered considered to be unsuitable as it is located within the Green landowners through the Call for achievable. Land at Tewin Belt and is very poorly related to the existing settlement. Sites and is considered to be 40/022 Tewin 69.76 No No No No Grove Development in this location would result in an available unacceptable intrusion into open countryside.

N - This greenfield site is located to the east of the railway Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is line within Thorley Parish. The site is considered to be through the Call for Sites by the considered unsuitable as it is poorly related to the existing settlement of landowner and is considered to achievable. Land north of 41/001 Thorley 0.44 Bishop's Stortford and is located within the Green Belt. be available. No No No No Twyford Bury

N - This large greenfield site is located to the south of Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is 750-1,000 Bishop's Stortford within the bypass. The site is within an through the Call for Sites by the considered dwellings Area of Archaelogical Significance and is traversed by the landowner and is considered to achievable. The Hertfordshire Way footpath. While the site is well related to be available. site is of a The site is the existing settlement, it is currently considered to be strategic scale considered to be unsuitable due to its location within the Green Belt. and would deliverable However it should be noted that the site has been identified require the subject to a Land south of within the emerging District Plan as a potential housing provision of review of the 41/002 Thorley 53.14 Whittington Way allocation. supporting Green Belt. The infrastructure. final yield would depend on the level of infrastructure to be provided.

N- This site is located to the south of Bishop's Stortford to Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is the west of the A1184 at Thorley Wash Farm. The site is through the Call for Sites by the considered considered to be unsuitable as it is poorly related to the landowner and is considered to achievable. Thorley Wash existing settlement of Bishop's Stortford and is located be available. 41/003 Thorley 0.48 No No No No Grange within the Green Belt. Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N - This greenfield site is located to the east of the railway Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is line withinThorley Parish. The site is considered to be through the Call for Sites by the considered unsuitable as it is poorly related to the existing settlement of landowner and is considered to achievable. 41/005 Thorley Land at Pig Lane 10.91 Bishop's Stortford and is located within the Green Belt. be available. No No No No

N - This greenfield site is located to the east of Thorley Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Street. While the site is reasonably well related to existing through the Call for Sites by the considered Land east of development, the site is considered to be unsuitable as it is landowner and is considered to achievable. 41/007 Thorley 0.74 No No No No London Road located in the Green Belt. be available.

N - This greenfield site is located to the east of Thorley Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Street. While the site is reasonably well related to existing through the Call for Sites by the considered Land at 1 Thorley development, the site is considered to be unsuitable as it is landowner and is considered to achievable. 41/008 Thorley 0.45 No No No No High located in the Green Belt. be available.

N- This greenfield site is located to the north west of High Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Cross, a Group 2 village. The northern part of the site is through the Call for Sites by the considered designated as open space and is used as playing pitches. landowner and is considered to achievable. The Football The considered to be unsuitable as it is located within the be available. Pitches (land south 42/001 Thundridge 8.5 Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt, is poorly related to the No No No No of Dane End existing settlement and would represent an unacceptable Road) incursion of built development into open countryside.

N - The site is reasonably well related to the existing village. Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Development would not represent infill development in a through the Call for Sites by the considered Group 2 village and could not come forward through a landowner and is considered to achievable. Land rear of 42/002 Thundridge 0.97 Neighbourhood Plan due to its location in the Green Belt, be available. No No No No Rennesley Farm and as such is considered unsuitable.

N - The site is reasonably well related to the existing village. Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Development would not represent infill development in a through the Call for Sites by the considered Group 2 village and could not come forward through a landowner and is considered to achievable. Land east of 42/003 Thundridge 1.25 Neighbourhood Plan due to its location in the Green Belt, be available. No No No No Cambridge Road and as such is considered unsuitable.

N - This greenfield site is located to the east of the school. Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is The site is reasonably well related to the existing urban through the Call for Sites by the considered area. Access is considered to be a significant constraint landowner and is considered to achievable. and although this could be achieved if the site is brought be available. Land rear of Puller forward alongside site 42/008, this would result in a 42/004 Thundridge 1.09 No No No No Memorial JMI cumulative total of development that would be inappropriate in a Group 2 village. Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N - The site is reasonably well related to the existing village. Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Development would not represent infill development in a through the Call for Sites by the considered Group 2 village and could not come forward through a landowner and is considered to achievable. Land south of Cold 42/005 Thundridge 1.13 Neighbourhood Plan due to its location in the Green Belt, be available. No No No No Christmas Lane and as such is considered unsuitable.

Please note that this site has not been assessed as it is in current employment use. 42/006 Thundridge Sutes Farm 1.47

Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha threshold as Land north of 24 identified by national policy. 42/007 Thundridge Cambridge 0.19 Cottages

N -This is a greenfield site that is reasonably well related to Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Up to 10 the existing settlement. Access could be achieved from the through the Call for Sites by the considered dwellings north of the site. Although it would not represent infill landowner and is considered to achievable. development in a Group 2 village, the site could be brought be available. Subject to a forward if identified within a Neighbourhood Plan. However, review of the Land to rear of the site is currently unsuitable due to its location within the village boundary 42/008 Thundridge Cambridge 1.15 Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt through a Cottages Neighbourhood Plan for Thundridge

Y - This is a greenfield site which now lies outside the Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is settlement boundary. Access to this site is considered to through the Call for Sites by the considered Land north of be a major constraint, and as such it is considered that the landowner and is considered to achievable. 42/009 Thundridge 0.71 No No No No North Drive site is unsuitable. be available.

N - The site is currently in use as open storage. It is Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is The site could be adjacent to the village boundary and existing employment through the Call for Sites by the considered appropriate for use. The site is currently unsuitable due to its location within landowner and is considered to achievable. employment use the Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt. be available. subject to a review of the village boundary Land at Oakley 42/010 Thundridge 0.57 through a Coach Builders Neighbourhood Plan for Thundridge Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N - The site is adjacent to the village boundary and existing Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is The site could be employment use. The site is currently unsuitable due to its through the Call for Sites by the considered appropriate for location within the Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt. landowner and is considered to achievable. employment use be available. subject to a review of the Land at Oakley village boundary 42/011 Thundridge 1.5 Coach Builders through a Neighbourhood Plan for Thundridge.

N - The site is unsuitable as it lies within Rural Area Beyond Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Green Belt and is isolated from any existing settlement. through the Call for Sites by the considered 42/012 Thundridge Sawtrees Yard 0.26 landowner and is considered to achievable. No No No No be available.

N - The site is unsuitable as it lies within Rural Area Beyond Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Land south of Cold Green Belt and is isolated from any existing settlement, and through the Call for Sites by the considered Christmas Lane would represent an unacceptable incursion of built landowner and is considered to achievable. 42/013 Thundridge 18.44 No No No No (adjacent to development within an open countryside setting. be available. Swangles Farm)

N - This is a greenfield site located immediately adjacent to Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is the existing village boundary. Following planning permission through the Call for Sites by the considered for the site immediately to the west, it is unlikely that this landowner and is considered to achievable. Land south of 42/014 Thundridge 0.86 site could be accessed. It is therefore considered to be be available. No No No No North Drive unsuitable.

Y - This is a greenfield site which lies within the village Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is boundary. While very well related to existing development, it through the Call for Sites by the considered is considered that this site performs an important role in landowner and is considered to achievable. Land south of The 42/017 Thundridge 0.78 maintaining the character of the village. As such it is be available. No No No No Rectory considered to be unsuitable.

N - This is a large greenfield site to the south of N - Land ownership is unknown Y - Site is Thundridge. The site is considered to be unsuitable as it is considered located in the Green Belt, is poorly related to the existing achievable. Land south of Cold 42/030 Thundridge 13.2 settlement and would represent an unacceptable incursion No No No No Christmas Lane of built development into an open countryside setting.

N - This greenfield site lies adjacent to the village boundary Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is to the north west of High Cross. The site is considered to through the Call for Sites by the considered be unsuitable as it lies within the Rural Area Beyond the landowner and is considered to achievable. Land adjacent to 42/032 Thundridge 1.33 Green Belt, is poorly related to the existing settlement and be available. No No No No Oaklands would represent an unacceptable incursion of built development into an open countryside setting. Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N - This large greenfield site is located to the west of Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Thundridge, a Group 2 village. While it is relatively well through the Call for Sites by the considered related to the existing settlement, the site is considered to landowner and is considered to achievable. Land west of be unsuitable due to its location within the Green Belt and be available. 42/033 Thundridge 3.8 No No No No Cambridge Road development would result in an unacceptable incursion into an open countryside setting.

N - This greenfield site lies to the east of High Cross and Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is immediately adjacent to the existing village boundary, with through the Call for Sites by the considered the A10 to the east. Access to this site is considered to be a landowner and is considered to achievable. Land north of major constraint, and as such it is considered that the site is be available. 42/034 Thundridge North Drive (west 1.61 No No No No unsuitable. of A10)

N - This is a greenfield site located off Poles Lane within a Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is designated Wildlife Site. The site is considered to be through the Call for Sites by the considered Land adjacent to unsuitable as it is within the Green Belt and is poorly related landowner and is considered to achievable. 42/035 Thundridge 1.02 No No No No Thundridge House to the existing settlement. be available.

N - This is a large greenfield site predominantly in Y - The site has been promoted Y - The site is The site could agricultural use. The southern part of the site lies through the Call for Sites by the considered to be form part of a immediately to the east of Stevenage and the northern half landowner and is considered to achievable at larger strategic of the site is located to the east of Box Wood, an Ancient be available. present. scale Woodland and Conservation Wildflife site.The southern half However, in development in could be appropriate as part of an urban extension to order to deliver a this location. Stevenage, although consideration would have to be given strategic scale of The site could to the impact on the Beane valley. The site is currently development, be considered unsuitable due to its location within the Green Belt. major to be either Land to the north infrastructure deliverable or east of Stevenage, 43/002 Walkern 248 would be developable Boxbury Farm & required. Further depending on Chells Farm work would the nature and therefore be scale of required to development. assess achievability. Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N - This is a greenfield site located to the east of Gresley Y - The site has been promoted Y - The site is The site could Way in Stevenage. The site could be appropriate as part of through the Call for Sites by the considered to be form part of a an urban extension to Stevenage, although consideration landowner and is considered to achievable at larger strategic would have to be given to the impact on the Beane valley. be available. present. scale The site is currently unsuitable due to its location within the However, in development in Green Belt. order to deliver a this location. strategic scale of The site could development, be considered Chells Field (land major to be either south of infrastructure deliverable or 43/003 Walkern Stevenage Road & 9.82 would be developable east of Gresley required. Further depending on Way) work would the nature and therefore be scale of required to development. assess achievability.

N - The site is located on the eastern side of the village, Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is adjacent to the village boundary, and is reasonably well through the Call for Sites by the considered related to existing development. The site is considered to landowner and is considered to achievable. be unsuitable due to its location within the Rural Area be available. Beyond the Green Belt. Winters Lane is also extremely Land to the rear of 43/004 Walkern 0.54 narrow which is likely to cause severe access difficulties. No No No No the White Lion PH

N - This greenfield site is located within the Rural Area Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Beyond the Green Belt. Any development in this location through the Call for Sites by the considered would represent an encroachment into the countryside. landowner and is considered to achievable. Land to rear of 6-7 Clay End is a very small Group 3 village with little or no be available. 43/005 Walkern 0.13 No No No No Clay End Road access to services and facilities and is considered to be an unsustainable location for development.

N - This greenfield site is located within the Rural Area Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Beyond the Green Belt. Any development in this location through the Call for Sites by the considered would represent an encroachment into the countryside. landowner and is considered to achievable. Land to the east of Clay End is a very small Group 3 village with little or no be available. 43/006 Walkern 0.16 No No No No Clay End Road access to services and facilities and is considered to be an unsustainable location for development.

Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha threshold as Land to rear of 5 43/007 Walkern 0.2 identified by national policy. Clay End Road Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha threshold as Land adjacent to 1 43/008 Walkern 0.18 identified by national policy. Clay End Road Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

Site not assessed as permission has been granted and the principle of development is therefore accepted. Land to the rear of 43/009 Walkern 1.89 19-39 Aubries

N - This is a greenfield site located adjacent to the village Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Up to 9 dwellings boundary, within the Walkern Conservation Area and through the Call for Sites by the considered opposite Grade II listed buildings to the north. The site is landowner and is considered to achievable. Subject to a relatively well related to the existing built up area, however, be available. review of the the site is currently considered to be unsuitable due to its village boundary location within the Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt. through a Land adjacent to Neighbourhood 43/010 Walkern 0.34 Granary Cottage Plan for Walkern.

N - This is a greenfield site located adjacent to the village Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Up to 3 dwellings boundary, within the Walkern Conservation Area. The site through the Call for Sites by the considered is relatively well related to the existing built up area, landowner and is considered to achievable. Subject to a however, the site is currently considered to be unsuitable be available. review of the due to its location within the Rural Area Beyond the Green village boundary Land north of Belt. through a 43/011 Walkern 0.12 Manor View Neighbourhood Plan for Walkern.

N – This large greenfield site is located in the Green Belt to Y - The site has been promoted Y - It is The site could the north of Ware, adjacent to Fanhams Hall, a registered through the Call for Sites by the considered that provide strategic Park and Garden. The site is currently unsuitable; however, landowner and is considered to the site is scale it offers the opportunity to provide a sustainable urban be available. achievable. development, extension to Ware subject to a review of the Green Belt. Development in either in this location has isloation or as been assessed part of a wider through the scheme, to the Land north of 44/001 Wareside 39.43 Delivery Study north and east Ware and is of Ware, subject considered to be to a review of viable. the Green Belt Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N - This is a brownfield site to the north of Babbs Green, a Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is very small Group 3 settlement, which contains a number of through the Call for Sites by the considered existing farm buildings. The site is considered to be landowner and is considered to achievable. unsuitable as it is located within the Rural Area Beyond the be available. 44/002 Wareside Appleton Farmyard 0.28 No No No No Green Belt and is isolated from local services and facilities.

Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha threshold as Land south of St 44/003 Wareside 0.18 identified by national policy. Georges Cottages

N - This is a greenfield site to the north of Babbs Green, a Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is very small Group 3 settlement. The site is considered to be through the Call for Sites by the considered unsuitable as it is located within the Rural Area Beyond the landowner and is considered to achievable. Land adjacent to 44/004 Wareside 0.69 Green Belt and is isolated from local services and facilities. be available. No No No No Appleton Farm

N – This large greenfield site is located in the Green Belt to Y - The site has been promoted Y - It is The site could the north and east of Ware. The site is currently unsuitable; through the Call for Sites by the considered that provide strategic however, it offers the opportunity to provide a sustainable landowner and is considered to the site is scale urban extension to Ware subject to a review of the Green be available. achievable. development, Belt. Development in either in this location has isloation or as been assessed part of a wider Land to the north & through the scheme, to the 44/005 Wareside 99.18 east of Ware Delivery Study north and east and is of Ware, subject considered to be to a review of viable. the Green Belt

N – This greenfield site is located in the Green Belt to the Y - The site has been promoted Y - It is The site could north east of Ware, partly within an Area of Archaelogical through the Call for Sites by the considered that provide strategic Significance. The site is currently unsuitable; however, the landowner and is considered to the site is scale site does relate well to other SLAA sites in the area, and be available. achievable. development, there may be potential for strategic scale development, Development in as part of a including necessary services and facilities, which would this location has wider scheme, Land west of Great relate well to Ware. been assessed to the north and 44/006 Wareside 1.5 Cozens through the east of Ware, Delivery Study subject to a and is review of the considered to be Green Belt viable. Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

Y – This brownfield site is located within the built up area of Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Up to 10 Watton-at-Stone where the principle of development is through the Call for Sites by the considered dwellings acceptable. The portakabins which were stored there by the landowner and is considered to achievable, previous tenant have all been removed and just two small, be available. although means The site is obsolete workshop buildings remain. It has not been in of access will considered Watton-at- Watton-at-Stone employment use and therefore Policy EDE2 does not apply. need to be deliverable 45/001 0.39 Stone Depot The premises have been vacant for over four years. formalised with a third party owner.

N – This brownfield site is located to the south of Watton-at- Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Stone, adjacent to a designated Wildlife Site. The site is through the Call for Sites by two considered also located within an Area of Archaeological Significance. landowners and is considered to achievable. Planning permission for residential development has be available. Watton-at- Land and buildings 45/002 0.71 previously been refused. The site is considered to be No No No No Stone at Perrywood Lane unsuitable due its rural location within the Green Belt.

Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha threshold as Watton-at- Land at 22 Great 45/003 0.11 identified by national policy. Stone Innings North

N - This greenfield site is located to the north of Watton at Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Up to 52 Stone, a Group 1 settlement. The site lies within an Area of through the Call for Sites by the considered dwellings Archaelogical Significance. While the site is well related to landowner and is considered to achievable. the exisitng settlement, it is currently considered to be be available. The site is unsuitable due its location within the Green Belt. However, considered the site, together with adjacent land, has been proposed for deliverable release from the Green Belt through the emerging District subject to a Watton-at- Land north of 25 Plan and could help enable the delivery of 10% growth review of the 45/004 2.08 Stone Walkern Road within the village. Green Belt through a Neighbourhood Plan for Watton at Stone.

N - This greenfield site is located to the north west of Y - Although not promoted Y - Site is Up to 55 Watton at Stone, a Group 1 settlement. While the site is through the Call for Sites, considered dwellings well related to the exisitng settlement, it is currently landowner and intentions are achievable. considered to be unsuitable due its location within the known. Site is therefore The site is Green Belt. However, the site, together with adjacent land considered to be available. considered to facilitate access, has been proposed for release from the deliverable Land north of Watton-at- Green Belt through the emerging District Plan and could subject to a 45/007 Great Innings 2.2 Stone help enable the delivery of 10% growth within the village. review of the North Green Belt through a Neighbourhood Plan for Watton at Stone. Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N - This greenfield site is located to the south of Watton at N - The site was not submitted Y - Site is Stone within an Area of Archaeological Significance. Whilst through the Call for Sites and it considered the site has a reasonable relationship to the form of the is therefore not known whether achievable. village, it is not clear how a satisfactory access could be the site is available. Watton-at- provided to the site. The site is currently considered to be 45/009 The Allotments 1.3 No No No No Stone unsuitable as it is located within the Green Belt and is currently in allotment use and safeguarded as such in the Local Plan.

N - This greenfield site is located to the west of Westmill, a Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is Group 2 village. Although it would not represent infill through the Call for Sites by the considered development in a Group 2 village, the site could be brought landowner and is considered to achievable. Up to 10 forward if identified within a Neighbourhood Plan. However, be available. dwellings the site is currently unsuitable due to its location within the Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt. The site is Land south of considered to be Cherry Green Lane deliverable 46/001 Westmill 0.6 No No No (between Pantiles subject to a & Gaynors Farm) review of the settlement boundary through a Neighbourhood Plan for Westmill

Y - This site is located to the east of Widford, a Group 2 Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Up to 5 dwellings village. Part of the sites lies within an Area of Archaelogical through the Call for Sites by the considered Significance. Development of the part of the site that is landowner and is considered to achievable. The site is located within the built up area is considered to be suitable be available. considered as it constitutes infill development in a Group 2 village. The deliverable 47/001 Widford Adams Farm 0.53 area outside of the built up area is unsuitable as it is subject to Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt policy.

N - This relatively large greenfield site is located to the east Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is of Widford, a Group 2 village. The site is considered to be through the Call for Sites by the considered unsuitable as it is poorly related to the existing settlement landowner and is considered to achievable. and is located within the Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt. be available. Land to rear of 47/002 Widford 1.66 Development would also constitute an unacceptable No No No No Adams Farm incursion into open countryside. Deliverable with Developable SLAA Site Area Policy Change with Policy PARISH SITE NAME Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha) Change

N - This relatively large greenfield site is located to the Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is Up to 10 south of Widford. Although it would not represent infill through the Call for Sites by the considered dwellings development in a Group 2 village, the site could be brought landowner and is considered to achievable. forward if identified within a Neighbourhood Plan. However, be available. The site is the site is currently unsuitable due to its location within the considered to be Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt. deliverable subject to a 47/011 Widford Martletts 1.12 No No review of the No settlement boundary through a Neighbourhood Plan for Widford.

SLAA SITE MAPS