TRANSACTIONS ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY willingness to pay (WTP) or maximum va maximum the or (WTP) pay out to willingness find to is CVM of objective Primary 2000). (Carson, stated ecosyst the value can respondent were valuation do usually is It 2015). Jim, and (Alex ecosystem nature especially values areathe using the valuation method that called Con degraded fundamentalfrom services is site the on plan implementation sustainable challenges, wh area, the to degradation capacity carrying exceeded of impact the over cause This services, regulating services, cultural services and supporting services provision as such ecosystems the from gain human that benefits the se Ecosystem environment”. the call we what forming factors physical of complex whole organism only not “ecosystem where statements (1935) Tansley strengthen micro and animal intera environment plant, of complex “dynamic activity INTRODUCTION © Transactions on Science and Technology 201 R Sabah Inanam Centre, Recreation Visitors’ Transactions on Science and Technology Vol. eceived Keywords differences payment vehicle and elicitation method of contingent development valuation onthe site is highly recommended. for suitable are collected fee conservation that r more add and purposes agrees also visitors The site. the of services ecosystem max the and respondents created by stated that was WTP of amount model the on relationship regression have distance and A age gender, that Centre. shows results Recreational Kionsom to place respondents between distance and WTP of factor that showed respondents.Result the by answeredfully are they as selected are questionnaire 100 only but sampling convenience using area paymentthe in distributed respondents is questionnaire the of 140 outvehicle. payment find to used Valuation is Contingent WTP KRC. of of services (CVM) ecosystem Method on opinion and (KRC) Centre Recreation Kionsom at conservation ABSTRACT Contingent Valuation Method (CVM) isatechnique tofind out the economic benefits ofnon num the increase has activities outdoor of popularity Recently, one and services many provides Forest imum WTP by per visitor to KRC is RM 2.89. Besides, most of the respondents valued highly the services of tree andtree of servicesthe highly valuedrespondents the of Besides, most 2.89. RM is KRCto visitor per by WTPimum
Andy Russel Mojiol Russel Andy 3
April 201
n h frs i bsd n h eoytm evcs provided services ecosystem the on based is forest the in : Willingness topay (WTP), Eco : 7 i o ti suy is study this of Aim
1
Revised
Forestry Complex, Faculty of Science and Natural Resources, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, - use of the area as the area can only have small number of visitor per time to reduce to time per visitor of number small have only can area the as area the of use Willingness To Pay (WTP) Pay To Willingness
23 April
tn a a ucinl nt (ntd ain 19: ril 2. h definition The 2). Article 1992: Nations (United unit” functional a as cting ecreation activities to attract visitor to visit Kionsom Recreational Centre (KRC). Future study on on study Future (KRC).Recreational Centre Kionsom visit to visitorattract to activitiesecreation . One of the ways to create a sustainable implementation plan is to eval to is plan implementation sustainable a create to ways the of One .
201 7
Mojiol Accepted 4 , No. 2, c afcs h mre vle f h ae. hs t oecm these overcome to Thus, area. the of value market the affects ich
7 1
to willingness the determine to et et al. * , 174 Ziyad Zamri Ziyad
20 ,
201
- - May May 201 touris
182 7 .
Transactions on Science and Technology. , 201 m, Kionsom Recreation Centre (KRC), Ecosystem services, Conservation
7 ( 7
Millennium Online lue of individual willingness to accept (WTA). accept to willingness individual of lue
2 Bdrdi & imtl 2007). Nikmatul, & (Badaruddin
Co *Corresponding author mmittee Member for
23 f the of
July 1 ,
m ae o tehpteia scenario hypothetical the on based em Muhammad Muhammad 201 tingent Valuation Method (CVM). - raim omnte ad hi non their and communities organism 7
Ecosystem Assessment, 2005) evcs s s erain ciiy Recreation activity. recreation as is services Kionsom Kionsom Waterfall, Inanam a ( pay . Email auto o suy ra b uig open using by areas study on valuation ,
: T) f iios o a amsin es for fees admission pay to visitors of WTP)
andy 4 (2), 174 Azrul Hilmi Azrul oa Kinabalu, Kota @
Jalan UMS, 88400, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, MALAYSIA. ums.edu.my
aiu value maximum n h forests the in e o vstr no oet area. forest into visitor of ber -
182 ne by making a hypotheticala making by ne
, o uti te ecosystem the sustain to 88450 88450 ;
at Tel: +6088
- ec, hs il cause will this Hence, ope, u as the also but complex,
influenced by gender, age gender, by influenced Kota Kinabalu, Sabah,
1 , Kionsom
- Maskir Gitom Maskir 320000 . Ecosystem is a a is Ecosystem . .
f individual of ;
Fax: +6088
This is the the is This
rvices are rvices ht been that
MALAYSIA. - living - . - 320
ended uate - Mean use 876 2 .
TRANSACTIONS ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY admission fee to the Kionsom Recreational Centre (KRC). service demographics Questionnaire design to Kionsom. Ulu Kampong settlements, human nearest the to services provision is which waterfall Kampung the and oversee Kionsom functio also waterfallKRCaddition, In Poring. to Kampung Baru, committee Bambangan a Kampung Kobuni, up Kampung set of composed to close villagers the with collaboration destinatio tourist a as developed be to potential its in believe who M Sepanggar of idea the by developed was waterfall main as closedandWaterfallKionsomto Research site METHODOLOGY Kio in provided services ecosystem on Recreation Centre (KRC). satisfaction regarding opinion visitors’ and (WTP) by provided services that shows thisThus, 2015). Tourism,villagers(Sabah the ofactivities the out carrying forexpensesand salaries KRC. of fee admission the the of ecosystemservices.developOne management for its the to funding the increase to is potential it reach KRC help to way the of One Kinabalu. Kota the in wisite the ensure to site the use when pay should users that costs actual the find to respondents of WTP ec the with correlate that fee admission of value suitable find will management the Method, Valuation (Competition service or item an on value real or estimation osystem provided by the area. Thus, it is crucial to find the value of the site by find the mean of mean the find by site the of value the find to crucial is it Thus, area. the by provided osystem an ino Rcetoa Cnr (R) s oae i N 5.2 16 12.52 E116 58.32 N5 in located is (KRC) Centre Recreational Kionsom usinar i dvdd no prs Te is pr i part first The parts. 3 into divided is Questionnaire Recreation Kionsom other tourist attracti ll sustainablell for future use. s provided in the are the in provided s attraction to the visitors and there are total of seven waterfalls in the site. the in waterfalls seven of total are there and visitors the to attraction Figure 1
h fnig f the of funding the , second part is the visitor opinion on the function of tree in the area and ecosystem and area the in tree of function the on opinion visitor the is part second ,
.
Location of Kionsom Recreation the area. the
on, Mari
Centre (KRC) has many potential to become one of the best attraction site attraction best the of one become to potential many has (KRC) Centre Mojiol Now, the entrance fee to the site is price at RM1.50, which RM1.50, at price is site the to fee entrance the Now, a and final part is the visitor valuation on willingness to pay (WTP) for (WTP) pay to willingness on valuation visitor the is part final and a
et et al. Thus, the aim of this study to find out the visitors willingness to pay to willingness visitors the out find to study this of aim the Thus,
, ie s o eog fr aneac o cnevto o ecosystem of conservation of maintenance for enough not is site
the Inanam town.waterfall Inanamthe The recreationalcentrefamous its is for 201 - Mari Cultural Village.
7 .
Transactions on Science and Technology. ISSN ISSN 2289 - 8786. nal as water catchment for the locals as it providedas it as locals the catchmentfor water as nal http://transectscience.org/ Centre. Source: Google me o Parliament, of ember
methods te epnet poiig n socio on profiling respondents the s Commission
4 (2), 174
n. The waterfall was developed in developed was waterfall The n.
-
to reach the the reach to 182
, 2010). , Map
au Ei Majimbun Eric Datuk as kon s Ulu as known also ,
The site is also close also is site The goals is by increaseby goalsis
(2015). Using Contingent Using
The seven The is used is
- to pay to storey
nsom 175 -
TRANSACTIONS ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY erainl area recreational by supported This single. Socio RESULT DISCUSSIONAND 2009). model fitted require not do it because mathematical arithmetic simple using calculated respondents for e abbreviation the Then, value. site. citizenshi nationality occupation, education, by proposed that model Method of analysis collection is weekends the on weeks two for done been has collection Data respondents. 10 only of Total research. the in sampling random of instead used been Sampling technique (KRC) amount maximum the is What theIf responde (KRC) money of amount maximum the is What open thevalue, elicited the with agreed were respondent the if then, and WTP elicited the with disagreed Centre Recreational upgrades something of way by tourist Kions every to imposed RM3 as much as payment If (Baral and T estimated. services ecosystem Then of conservation KRC. for in KRC in provided users of (WTP) pay to willingness derive to used values) use Willingness to pay ducation levelducation
epnet otl erig, ( earnings, monthly respondent
Majority Where, This sampling convenience the KRC, the visited that visitors statistical of unavailable to Due or agreed were respondents the whether questionnaire the in asked were respondents The attempted was study This - - om (KRC) area, are you willing to pay? demographics ended question isasked:
? ?
0 of questionnaire is selected for further analyse as analysefurtherselectedfor is of questionnaire 0
eerhd s sn dsrpie nlss chi analysis, descriptive using is researched
Ranju, 2008).
starte n csse srie poie b KRC by provided services ecosystem on he CVM with CVM he
visite of the respondents were respondents the of WTP is the willingness to pay, pay, to willingness the is WTP nts nts were , (occ) ,
d at 8am and finished a
r ak ae ot gop u t te ru pyial al t d atvt that activity do to able physically group the to due group youth are parks or
t te site the to d for
disagreeing
te grgt mntr bnft of benefits monetary aggregate the , respondent occupation, ( occupation, respondent Mojiol
aao 18) ersin model regression (1985) Yamano Afifuddin (2009) statements that majority of respondents that visited the visited that respondents of majority that statements (2009) Afifuddin open
of money of
et et al.
of the parameter is used in the in used is parameter the of
to measure the conservation benefits from visitor’s perspecti visitor’s from benefits conservation the measure to . - , ended WTP as elicitation format elicitation as WTP ended
201 o ma ad ein T i open in WTP median and mean For 7
ref with elici .
Transactions on Science and Technology. ISSN ISSN 2289
that you that you that
) m
for
ale t 5pm. - 8786. , age in between 21 to 30, to 21 between in age , epnet sts r sites respondents p, salary earned, references and number visited to the to visited number and references earned, salary p, ted WTP, then the respondents were asked:
willing to p to willing to pay to willing http://transectscience.org/ is the p the is
nat )
Te otnet auto mto (V) is (CVM) method valuation contingent The . for - - value of the constant the of value ay to upgrade the upgrade to ay qae n mlil rgeso bsd on based regression multiple and square
respondent nationality citizenship, (wage)citizenship, nationality respondent the questionnaire is fully answered by theansweredfullyby questionnairethe is
n h CM f erain park recreation of CVM the on
equation such as such equation
upgrade 4 (2), 174
eferences con
140 questionnaire is col is questionnaire 140 is employed is
- evn rceto cnr were centre recreation serving
182
the
u
ndergraduate students and students ndergraduate
- Recreational Centre Kionsom Centre Recreational Kionsom Centre Recreational ne CM lctto is elicitation CVM ended n ( and
and the process of data of process the and ,
( num in the questionnaire the in edu) edu)
is the parameter p parameter the is fr n for ) for
respondent
lected (Ndebele, umber ve (non ve which , s
have
but
176 of - -
TRANSACTIONS ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY io (00, hc sae ht oeg tourist has number through tourism agency visitedand the site foreign in certain period only. that researched state the which (2010), during Simon timespan of th understandingby supported also lack is This English. in speaking of capable that visitor foreigngetting from prevented for Furthermore, barrier interview. became during which language, communication native in speak to incapability their due questionnaire the in participate to likely less are they but site the visited who thus pressures, psychology many to society the exposed has development national social and “industry statement, to access a site, the to home from distance their KM 25 to 16 visited, have also were req Monthly income Family size status Relationship Nationality Occupation Education level Age Gender demographic Socio uired physically challenge such as jogging, swimming and hiking. Then, most of the respondentsthe of mostThen, hiking. swimming and jogging, as suchchallenge physically uired
-
KRC
(See Table 1 Table (See
iie te ie n ag ubr pes r h ierfrne msl aefrt time first are mostly reference, site the are peers number, large in site the visited nraig h atvt o rceto aog hm. lhuh hr ae foreigners are there Although them”. among recreation of activity the increasing
Others Non Malaysia Female Male Variable RM1000 RM500 and Less than RM500 People Above 10 7 4 1 Married Single Others Self employed Private Worker Students Public Worker Others Bachelor Diploma formal Secondary school Primary school education No thanMore 50 41 31 21 Less than 21 - - - 9 Peo 6 People 3 People - - - 50 40 30 Mojiol -
for further analysis further for Malaysia
Table 1
- ple et et al.
RM999 -
RM1499
,
201
7 .
.
Socio Transactions on Science and Technology.
ISSN ISSN 2289
- demographics of respondents - 8786. 8 63 25 49 51 Freq.(n) 11 5 45 10 26 42 22 0 19 81 0 100 2 11 9 62 16 3 51 9 28 2 7 2 2 ). This trend of visitor supported by Wan Sabri (1989) Sabri Wan by supported visitor of trend This ).
http://transectscience.org/
iie te erain ie sal cm i large in come usually site recreation the visited
nd mostly are using car as transportationas car using are mostly nd
4 (2), 174
-
182 8% 63% 25% 49% 51% ( Percentage 11% 5% 45% 10% 26% 42% 22% 0% 19% 81% 0% 100% 2% 11% 9% 62% 16% 3% 51% 9% 28% 2% 7% 2% 2% %)
qetonie and questionnaire e
177
TRANSACTIONS ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY re n h ae ta sae b mjrt o rsodns ma soe44) Mawie te least the score=2.87) (See Table 2). Meanwhile, score=4.46). (mean o respondents contribution of and majority function by stated that area the in tree of function third the is calmness give and score=4.46), (mean site the in tree by contribution biggest score mean highest the with beauty natural provide tree that agree are respondents the of most findings, the on Based contribution. in highest the is 5 contributi and about question Then, disagree. are people 4 only while agree are respondents Opinion on ecosystem valuation use Transportation site the to Distance Number of vi references Information Visit purpo Come with ot f h rsodns r are ht re i KC ly a iprat oe s 6 f the of 96 as role important an plays KRC in trees that agree are respondents the of Most
se on were asked in the questionnaire. The scale is from 1 to 5, which 1 is the lowest andlowest the is 1 which 5, to 1 from is scale The questionnaire.the in asked were on
sit provide calmness Shading Providing natural beauty Contribution
Bicycle Walking Motorcycle Public transport Car M Large group Partner Family Alone thanMore RM2000 RM1500 More thanMore 25Km 16Km 5Km Less than 5Km thanMore 2Times 2 times First time Inadvertently Surrounding people Tourism agency Internet Family Friends Others Field Trip Research Sightseeing Picnic ass m
Mojiol Table 2 - 15Km -
25Km te i te ra s h fnto o te a rlgos ciiy ( activity religious as tree of function the is area the in tree f
et et al.
edia
- RM1999
of tree
,
201 .
Visitor’s
7
.
Transactions on Science and Technology. ISSN ISSN 2289
’s
at
K opinion on role oftree - 8786. RC 43 14 43 0 1 8 3 1 7 80 2 2 1 39 56 71 12 14 3 30 9 0 0 10 15 75 18 36 34 12
http://transectscience.org/
of
4.55. Then, 4.55. Mean score
4 (2), 174
4.46 4.46 4.55 s
in in KRC
-
followed by shading as second as shading by followed 182 43% 14% 43% 0% 1% 8% 3% 1% 7% 80% 2% 2% 1% 39% 56% 71% 12% 14% 3% 30% 9% 0% 0% 10% 15% 75% 18% 36% 34% 12%
Standard Error 0.809 0.758 0.672 forest
tree function tree
mean 178 s
TRANSACTIONS ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Table 3 fertility are t soil and erosion soil and storage, and sequestration carbon weather, extreme stabilizing quality, air and climate local Regulating 4. above ranked is 7 of out 4 with services regulating is questionnaire provision cl isin function the ranked is highest is the as 4 site the by than provided services higher score mean no are There areas. grove secret in least provide respondents with 4 above rank functions state 6 of out 2 services cultural in Then, site. the of function with respondentsthat feels nutrientrecycling, formationsoil crucialoneofwildlife habitat and for is sc mean highest the has Centre Recreation and Kionsom of agree not is respondents the of supportecosystem and habitat portion in servicesof Function site. services,the by providedservices the a with unsure only cultural and services the support, with agree ecosystem are most respondents which questionnaire, and the in asked habitat been are services regulating as and services provision such services Ecosystem questionnaire. et at n the in part Next
h st poiig erainl evcs n tuim ra wie epnet fn te area the find respondents while areas tourism and services recreational providing site the Cultural services ecosystem support Habitat and E .
The visitor rated onthe function of each ecosystem provided in the area. cosystem he function that gains mean score higher than 4 (See Table 3).
Note For For religious purpose Sound barrier woodFor product Controlling weed production Wind barrier Screeni For education Increase property value wildlifeFor habitat Reduce earth temperature Ground cover plants absorberRain Ornamental beauty& Provides Recreation, sport picnic& psychological and pressure stress Decrease Provide appropriate climate soilFor erosion control Supplying oxygen & fresh air : S Mean scoreMean ervices usinar i te adcp o eoytm evcs s en se i the in asked been is services ecosystem of landscape the is questionnaire
ng
Mojiol
aesthetic value
1the is 5 lowest the inis and highest contribution
et et al.
,
nrae utrl atsi and and history spirituality, of Increase artistic aesthetic appreciation cultural, Increase Maintenance ofgenetic diversity Habitat for wildlife species Soil formation Nutrient recycling 201
7
.
Transactions on Science and Technology. ISSN ISSN 2289
- 8786.
Function
http://transectscience.org/
ore with 3 out of 4 functions ranked above 4 above ranked functions 4 of out 3 with ore
4 (2), 174
ean water. Last services asked in the in asked services Last water. ean 2.87 3.41 3.46 3.51 3.57 3.71 3.88 3.94 4.09 4.12 4.16 4.19 4.23 4.25 4.27 4.33 4.39 4.46 3.8
-
182
Mean score 3.74 3.87 3.60 4.23 4.28 4 .28
1.419 1.291 1.223 1.218 1.208 1.192 1.174 1.102 1.023 1.005 0.961 0.956 0.936 0.896 0.886 0.865 0.834 0.827 0.92
Deviation Standard
1.116 1.070 1.414 1.004 0.889 0.877
of the of 179
TRANSACTIONS ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (p =0.035). p the where with the p showResults58 respondents were agreedthe withpayment 42andofthe respondents disagreedare Contingent valuation analysis Based onBased the Yamano (1985) fee. admission stated the on (WTP) pay to willingness their about asked were Respondents RM 9.10 RM 8.10 RM 7.10 RM 6.10 RM 5.10 RM 4.10 RM 3.10 RM 2.10 RM 1.10 RM 0.10 Provision services Regulating services Class (RM) ayment. The mean maximu
-
value of the factors are gender (p = 0.061), age 0.061), = (p gender are factors the of value – – – – – – – – – –
RM 10.00 RM 9.00 RM 8.00 RM 7.00 RM 6.00 RM 5.00 RM 4.00 RM 3.00 RM 2.00 RM 1.00 WTP =0.159*(Gender) +0.103*(Age)
Mojiol
Average Table
et et al. 9.55 8.55 7.55 6.55 5.55 4.55 3.55 2.55 1.55 0.55
,
regression model Provide tourism areas Provide education and learning physical and health mental the to improve services, recreational Providing appro Pest andPest Pollination Purification of water and air Soil erosion and soil fertility Carbon sequestration and storage Stabilizing extreme weather quality Regula Source energy (Hydro power) Source decorative Source ethno cleanFor water Genetic resources Source of raw materials Fo Provide secret grove areas 201
7 od resources 4 .
. Transactions on Science and Technology. ISSN ISSN 2289
m WTP is RM 2.89 (See Table 4). The average of respondents WTP ach the creator
ig oa ciae n air and climate local ting
Frequency
disease control -
8786. 15 17 17 22 20 - 5 0 0 2 2 medicines http://transectscience.org/
, a model has been built, where
– Relative frequency
0.090*(Distanc
(p = 0.048) distance travelled to the site the to travelled distance 0.048) = (p
4
(2), 174
(f/n) 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.15 0.17 0.17 0.22 0.20
-
182
e) +1.238e)
3.58 3.87 4.22 4.06 4.37 4.29 3.18 3.69 3.73 3.85 3.17 3.57 3.58 2.86 4.54 3.82 4.42 3.65 Average*Fr (f/N) TOTAL=RM2.89
:
0.4775 0.00 0.0000 0.1310 0.1110 0.6825 0.6035 0.4335 0.3410 0.1100 1.249 1.079 0.917 1.052 0.761 0.891 1.373 1.107 1.090 1.077 1.400 1.047 1.112 1.491 0.744 1.077 0.794 1.282 00
180
TRANSACTIONS ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY [3] [2] [1] REFERENCES manuscript grantsmall Poring UMS Kampung researched. and the during helping been have who undergraduates Kionsom Kampung Baru, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS site.the for WTP of variability the increase will it as recommended, also is vehicle payment different Using is study future for Recommendation low. is sample the of probability the because issue an also is sampling ecosystem as KRC of function the agreed visitors of services pr Majority locals. the to services ecosystem highl is KRC providedsignificantalso KRC KRC.the to come ofvisitorsto attraction of partas tree ofimportance of ecosystem the in increasing tree of of effect function the evaluate to trial putting by the that out find also findings site.The the to visitor of number come KRC the to admissionfee of amount of management by conduct be can fee of amount increased The services. other and improvements infrastructure maintenance, will increase the visitors WTP. infrastructuretheto leveland payment due the were respondents help to pay to willing Centre Recreation CONCLUSION admission current of increase The (WTP) shows this use. Thus, future 2.89. RM for are WTP implement visitors plan sustainable no if f 1.50 RM is fee admission future the in capacity carrying visitor of
thank to like would We Conveniencestudy. the of limitation the is which small, too is questionnaire this in size Sample for fee the use management the as function to KRC for crucial very is fee Admission Kionsomin visitors for 3 RM of WTP elicitedthe for pay to agreed respondentsthewere of 89% increasing The KRC. in visitors of WTP of mean the estimate to is study this of aim The urban trees: Implication for Contingent Valuation Methods. Alex, Y. Hidupan Liar Lokawi Kota Kinabalu Jadin, Bahasa dan Pustaka. A. Nikmatul, & M. Badaruddin,
from RM 1.50 to RM 2.89.
to use larger sampling size and random sampling method instead of convenience sampling.convenience insteadof method sampling random and sizesampling larger use to s
in the area has increased the number of footprint at the site and this will exceed the KRC the exceed will this and site the at footprint of number the increased has area the in ovided tothe loca .
A.
L. & Jim, C. L. &Jim,
(2009).
S
(KRC) GK agree 0027
eeoig h ae b rpiig h ifatutr. Alth infrastructure. the repairing by area the developing d with the elicited amount, there were there amount, elicited the with d aa kpaa dn eagua Mmaa (T) egnug e Taman ke Pengunjung (WTP) Membayar Kesanggupan dan kepuasan Tahap . Majority of visitors were agreed with the elicited WTP state WTP elicitedthe with agreed werevisitors of Majority .
Mojiol
or adults and RM 0.50 for child for 0.50 RM and adults or Y. (2015). ProtestY. (2015). response and willingness topay for culturally significant -
STWN l community around Kionsom.Ulu
et et al. h ha o vill of head the
,
201 - 2015 7 .
Transactions on Science and Technology. ISSN ISSN 2289 . Tesis Ijazah Sarjana Muda Sains Perhutan
. N. We w We
(2007). - 8786. g o K. apn Kbn, apn Bambangan Kampung Kobuni, Kampung Kg. of age ould http://transectscience.org/ of safety in the area. Thus, improvements in the areaThus,thearea.theimprovementsin in ofsafety eacna pelancongan Perancangan also rgre b te iios Ti idcts the indicates This visitors. the by regarded y o ae hs td possible study this make to like thank the anonymousreviewersthe thank like . Based on the WTP aggregation, the mean the aggregation, WTP the on Based .
4 (2), 174
The funding of this study was from was study this of funding The 11% of respondents disagree respondents of 11% Ecological Economics
-
182
e o vstr wlig o pay to willing visitors of fee
Kuala . an, UMS.
uh aoiy of majority ough Lumpur: , d 114 that they arethey that
, n UMS and admission
58
number
- Dewan this for d 66
with .
181
TRANSACTIONS ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY [14] [13] [12] [11] [10] [9] [8] [7] [6] [5] [4]
etrn ad rsrig csse Srie i a Ipie Wetland Impaired an Zealand: in Services Ecosystem Preserving Meas and in Restoring Method Valuation Contingent the of Pekapeka Application of An Perservation Swamp: and Restoration the of Study Case A Services. Ecosystems and Ecosystems (2009). T. Ndebele, Yamano, J. Universiti Pertanian Malaysia (1985). M. W. Sabri, Wan U.N. (1992). 307. A. Tansley, UMS Sabah. Tambunan, Range Crocker Mahua, Taman (2010) A. S. Simon, Tourism.Sabah (2015). (2005). synthesis Assessment, Ecosystem Millenium /our_role/ analysis/summary_ and_ report_ combined.pdf ( (2010). Commision. Competition 34 Cars development. local Ecological economics and finance park sustainable for Implication Nepal: Area, Conservation J. Marc N., Baral tp/wbrhv.ainlrhvsgvu//tp/ w http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http:/ (8), 1413
on, R. T. (2000). Contingentuser' a valuation:(2000). T. R.on, .
.
Massey University. Washington D.C., USA: -
1418. F. (1985
G. (1935). The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms. and concepts vegetational of abuse and use The (1935). G. United Nations framework convention on climate change
S. . ). ,
Mojiol Kajian terhadap kesanggupan untuk membayar (WTP) pengunjung ke sub ke pengunjung (WTP)membayar untuk kesanggupan terhadap Kajian 66
Statistic: a tool for social research Rnu B (08. otnet auto o Eoors i Annapurna in Ecotourism of Valuation Contingent (2008). B. Ranju, & cnmc Non Economic (2), 218 Tourism Statistic.
et et al. Outdoor recreation in Malaysia. Faculty of Forestry of Faculty Malaysia. in recreation Outdoor ,
201
- . 7 227.
.
Transactions on Science and Technology. ISSN ISSN 2289
World Resources
eiw f ttd rfrne n Wliges o a Methods Pay to Willingness and Preference Stated of Review - akt auto Tcnqe: hoy n Apiain to Application and Theory Techniques: Valuation Market - 8786.
( http://www.sabahtourism.com/business/statistic http://transectscience.org/ csses n hmn well human and Ecosystems
ei Iaa Sraa ua an Perhutanan. Sains Muda Sarjana Ijazah Tesis s guide. guide. s . USA Inst itute. w Competition ww.
4 : Wadsworth Publishing. (2), 174
) EnvironmentalT and Science . Accessed on 12 Mei 2015
-
182 . Geneva: United Nation,
rn te cnmc au of Value Economic the uring . amrtn ot, New North, Palmerston . -
commission.org.uk Serdang, Serdang, - en: biodiversity being: Ecology
. echnology
Selango ,
1 6 -
stesen , 284 , ) 1
- 24. 182 r: - . ,