The Creation of Heritage in Vientiane, Laos
STUDIES IN GLOBAL ARCHAEOLOGY 13
PRESERVING IMPERMANENCE
THE CREATION OF HERITAGE IN VIENTIANE, LAOS
ANNA KARLSTRÖM
Department of Archaeology and Ancient History
Uppsala University
2009 Dissertation presented at Uppsala University to be publicly examined in Geijersalen, Centre for the Humanities, English Park Campus, Thunbergsvägen 3P, Uppsala, Saturday, June 6, 2009 at 13:00 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. The examination will be conducted in English.
Abstract Karlström, A. 2009. Preserving Impermanence. The Creation of Heritage in Vientiane, Laos. Studies in Global Archaeology 13. 239 pp. 978-91-506-2077-1.
This thesis is about the heritage in Vientiane. In an attempt to go beyond a more traditional descriptive approach, the study aims at bringing forward a discussion about the definition, or rather the multiplicity of definitions, of the concept of heritage as such. The unavoidabe tension emanating from a modern western frame of thought being applied to the geographical and cultu- ral setting of the study provides an opportunity to develop a criticism of some of the assumptions underlying our current definitions of heritage. For this particular study, heritage is defined as to include stories, places and things. It is a heri- tage that is complex and ambiguous, because the stories are parallel, the definitions and percep- tions of place are manifold and contested, and the things and their meaning appear altered, de- pending on what approach to materiality is used. The objective is not to propose how to identify and manage such a complex heritage. Rather, it is about what causes this complexity and ambi- guity and what is in between the stories, places and things. In addition, the study aims to critically deconstruct the contemporary heritage discourse, which privileges material authenticity, form and fabric and the idea that heritage values are universal and should be preserved for the future and preferably forever. In Laos, Buddhism dominates as religious practice. In this context, the notion of material im- permanence also governs the perception of reality. Approaches to materiality in Buddhism are related to the general ideas that things are important from a contemporary perspective and prima- rily as containers for spiritual values, that the spiritual values carry the connection to the past, and that heritage is primarily spiritual in nature and has little to do with physical structure and form. By exploring the concepts of restoration, destruction and consumption in such a perspective, we understand that preservation and restoration are active processes of materialisation. We also understand that destruction and consumption are necessary for the appreciation of certain herita- ge expressions, and that heritage is being constantly created. With this understanding, this book is an argument for challenging contemporary western heritage discourse and question its fundamen- tal ideology of preservationism.
Keywords: Vientiane, Laos, heritage, impermanence, preservation, restoration, destruction, immate- riality, materiality, narrativity, Buddhism, animism
Anna Karlström, African and Comparative Archaeology, Box 626, Uppsala University, SE-75126 Uppsala, Sweden
© Anna Karlström 2009
ISSN 1651-1255 ISBN 978-91-506-2077-1 urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-101166 (http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-101166)
Cover illustration: Vientiane survey 2003, Bounheuang Bouasisengpaseuth and monk at Vat Nak. Insert: photographs and illustrations by Anna Karlström unless otherwise stated. Lao translations: Oudomphone Bounyavong.
Published and distributed by: Department of Archaeology and Ancient History, Uppsala Univer- sity, Box 626, SE-751 26 Uppsala, Sweden. Printed in Sweden by Edita Västra Aros, 2009
CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 7
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS IN LAO 11
NOTE ON TRANSCRIPTION 14
INTRODUCTION 15
PART I STORIES
1. OTHERS’ STORIES 25 Envoys and explorers – confirming their own identities Colonisers – emphasising difference and power Scientists – searching for truth and origin Contemporary archaeological stories Imperialist structures 2. INSIDE STORIES 53 Use of written sources – searching and researching history Heroes – strengthening identities Professionals and politicians – developing and defending nationalism Nationalist structures 3. NARRATIVITY 73 Narrativity as knowledge Narrative structure and scientific truth Orality and literacy Creation and location through stories
PART II PLACE
4. VIENTIANE 83 An archaeological site Archaeological surveys 2001-2003 5. CONTESTED DEFINITIONS 99 Urbanism Mandala and meuang Lao culture area Maps and imaginary landscapes 6. ALTERNATIVE ARCHAEOLOGICAL FRAMEWORKS 111 Origins and developments of a city How to get water Border markers
PART III THINGS
7. MATERIAL CULTURE, IMMATERIAL CULTURE 141 Material culture studies Immaterial materiality Animism Popular Buddhism 8. VIENGKHAM AND SAY FONG 155 Archaeological excavations 2003-2004 Military camps and moated sites Temples and stones The city of 300 temples 9. UNDERSTANDING MATERIALITIES 177 Absence and presence, spiritual and material Things as meaning Time and origin Authenticity Materiality and immateriality in flux
PART IV HERITAGE
10. PRESERVING IMPERMANENCE: A CONTRADICTION IN TERMS 191 The rise and development of a heritage discourse Preservation Impermanence 11. PRESERVATION AS CHANGE 199 Restoration and conservation Destruction and decay Consumption, looting and loss 12. HERITAGE CREATED 211
SUMMARY IN LAO 217
NOTES 223
REFERENCES 227
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
To put it simply, I find writing a challenge, but also a joy. Now, there is an enormous debt I wish to express to all of you who have been involved, but I find it difficult to fully express this debt in an acknowledgement. I hope to have, at least to some extent, returned your generous support by completing this thesis, which is why I find writing not only a challenge and a joy, but also a duty. Having said this, and having written the book, I nevertheless take the opportunity to express in words in the following acknow- ledgement what some of you have contributed with. Before anything else, I wish to mention my first teacher in archaeology, Inger Österholm, who at the very beginning inspired me to continue study archaeology and enthusiastically encouraged the idea of going to Laos, and her husband, Sven Öster- holm, who shared with us students his profound knowledge about archaeological methods. Two years ago, Inger passed away, and one year later, Sven followed her. It is with deep sadness I realise that I will never be able to share with them neither the con- tent of this book nor any other archaeological inquiry. At the very beginning were also Elisabet Lind, Per Sørensen and Peter Fogde, whose contributions were in different ways decisive for my first meeting with Laos. For that invaluable help and encourage- ment, I will always be indebted to them. Another person among those who have been there from the beginning is Anna Källén, who has accompanied me all along the way. Without your stimulating company, as dear friend and colleague, I would have been so much poorer in thoughts and in words. I thank you for that, and for all the good times we have shared along the way. Laos has become a part of me, mainly owing to the project that started a few years after that first meeting, and that now ends with this thesis. I could not have accom- plished this if it was not for my friends and colleagues in Laos. This book is to a large extent yours. You shared with me your stories, your land and your ideas about past and present. I owe my deepest gratitude to many more than I could ever acknowledge here. I have expressed my gratitude to some of you in your own acknowledgement, thanks to Oudomphone Bounyavong who elegantly turned my English words into Lao. Nonethe- less, there are a few I want to acknowledge here too. The Ministry of Information and Culture in Vientiane has been my cooperation partner over the years, and without the great knowledge and generous help from colleagues at the Department of Museum and Archaeology and at the Lao National Museum the archaeological investigations in Vientiane could never have been realised. My heartful thanks go to every member of
7 PRESERVING IMPERMANENCE
the staff there. At the very beginning, Thongsa Sayavongkhamdy and Viengkeo Souk- savathdy inspired me to choose what to focus on in my research. I will always be in- debted to them for that. I am also grateful to Thonglit Luangkhot, who played a deci- sive role in the initial phase of my project. Bounheuang Bouasisengpaseuth and Kanda Keosopha have been the persons who have conducted most of the fieldwork together with me. You deserve very extra special thanks, because during fieldwork we have not only worked together, but also lived together. By assisting me with introductions and insights, and teaching me about everyday life in Laos, you have made it possible for me to deepen my understanding of Laos, its past and present, and to deepen the relation- ships with all persons we have met and interacted with throughout the project. I owe you big thanks. I also wish to acknowledge others who have made generous contributions to my fieldwork in and around Vientiane. I want to thank Michel Lorrillard for always keeping the doors open to the EFEO office in Vientiane, and for sharing and discussing your research material with me. Alan Potkin and Catherine Raymonds have also always very generously shared their ideas and research material with me. Thank you so much for that. At the Lao National Museum I was lucky, even before my PhD project began, to meet Marion Ravenscroft, whose friendship has accompanied me since. At the museum was also Bronwyn Campbell, who in the later phases of my work provided invaluable help in the production of the Viengkham and Say Fong exhibitions. My heartful thanks goes to Göran Franson, who volunteered during the excavations in 2003-2004. With kind assistance from Lennart Hasselgren, the Thai-Lao georadar team helped me to identify invisible structures, which later on were dated thanks to very generous support from Andrew Murray at the Nordic Laboratory for Luminescence Dating in Roskilde. The staff at Finnmap provided me with detailed and beautiful maps. For this, I am very grateful. Throughout the years, during which I conducted fieldwork in Laos, I always received the support I needed from the Swedish Embassy in Vientiane. They also fi- nancially supported the production of the Viengkham and Say Fong exhibitions. If we continue on the international scene, I wish to express my gratitude to Pisit Charoenwongsa and his staff at SEAMEO-SPAFA in Bangkok, who hosted me for three weeks and helped me in my initial aspirations to better understand the vast field of contemporary Southeast Asian heritage management. In Bangkok, Heather Peters and David Feingold opened the doors to the UNESCO office and were inspiring in the (vast) field of anthropology in Southeast Asia. Thank you for being stimulating discus- sion partners in an early phase of this project. Peter Schalk contributed, also in an early stage, with his profound knowledge about Buddhism and guided me in different ways, giving me a better understanding of this deeply fascinating area. Ian Glover, Joyce White, Rasmi Shoocongdej and Magnus Fiskesjö have also, in different ways, been influential and inspiring to my work in Southeast Asia. Thank you all. In late 2007, I had the opportunity to spend four months in London. At the department of anthro-
8 PREFACE
pology at UCL, I met and interacted with many who have had profound impact on my thinking about some of the issues addressed in this thesis. I am especially grateful to Daniel Miller for including me, during this period, in his group of doctoral students, and to Elizabeth Moore for inviting me to the SOAS seminars. This project rests on the financial support from different institutions and funds. I am indebted to Sida/SAREC for overall financial support, to STINT for the scholar- ship that made my stay at UCL possible, to Margareta Biörnstad’s Fund for Interna- tional Heritage Cooperation for covering my stay at SEAMEO-SPAFA, to the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences for covering fieldwork expenses, the Swedish Research Council for a contribution to the OSL datings, and the Nordic Graduate School in Archaeology for the possibility to participate in rewarding PhD courses. My warm thanks also go to Grant Evans, William Logan, Musée Guimet, EFEO and Diethard Ande at White Lotus Press for allowing me to reproduce your photos in this book. My deepest gratitude goes to Paul Sinclair for patient supervision, constant encour- agement and generous support. I remember our first meeting, when I aspired to be- come a PhD student. You scrolled the globe on your desk, eventually found Laos and, after some negotiation, agreed that my ideas had potential to draw on for an application for funding a PhD project. I thank you, Paul, for including Southeast Asia in your global research frame, for sustaining my imagination to pursue this project, for being a great supervisor and a good friend. I also want to acknowledge my other supervisor, Frands Herschend, who has always and at any time been available for reading, com- menting and discussing. Your invaluable assistance during the last year has been deci- sive for the completing of this book. You have also made me realise that there are plentiful interesting and possible directions to choose among for future projects, and that they are limited only by my own imagination. In the years since I started as a PhD student, I have found myself excited by the support from and discussions with colleagues at both Uppsala University and Gotland University. Many are you who have contributed in different ways, and at different stages in this process. Anna Källén, Vicky Saenz, Fredrik Andersson, Carina Johansson, Kristin Österman Andersson, Johannes Siapkas and Lotta Hillerdal have provided opportunities to improvement of the text by reading and generously commenting on various drafts. I wish to thank you for not only being stimulating colleagues, but also good friends. To Åsa Larsson, I wish to say that I am delighted to have shared office space with you over the last years. I appreciate your company and your extraordinary capacity to take an active interest in others’ challenges and problems. To Lotta Me- jsholm (my sister in turmoil the last months), Cia Lidström-Holmberg, Lena Johansson de Chateau, Johan Hegardt, Anneli Ekblom, Kalle Lindholm, C-G Ojala, Daniel Löwenborg, Karin Bangtsson, Anna Gatti, Fredrik Hallgren, Thomas Eriksson, Chris- tian Isendahl, Neil Price and Alex Sanmark, I wish to express my gratitude for being great colleagues and friends throughout the years. I deeply thank the staff at the de-
9 PRESERVING IMPERMANENCE
partment of archaeology in Uppsala, in particular Christina Bendegard for sharing with me your friendship, Birgitta Karlsson for carrying heavy administrative matters on your shoulders and, together with Elisabet Green, for professionally solving and structuring practical challenges of various sorts. Elisabet, you deserve extra special thanks also for revising my English. Gotland is the place where it all began as I entered Inger Öster- holm’s archaeology class many years ago. Gotland is the place I always return to, as it is also my home. I am indebted to the staff at the department of archaeology at Gotland University, in particular Alex Andreeff for good company and for lending your office desk, and Gunilla Runesson for generously providing me with working space even though I have no formal connections to your department. History and the fact that I count as a local resident seem to be enough, and for that I am grateful. Paul Wallin and Helene Martinsson Wallin have been stimulating colleagues and good friends over the years. I am happy that you too have Gotland as your home. There is also a group of ethnologists, historians and art historians at Gotland University that I wish to acknowl- edge. I have benefited a lot from sharing working space with you and always felt in- cluded in your realm, physically as well as when it comes to thinking of and discussing professional matters, and participating in seminars. My very special thanks go to Carina Johansson for invaluable friendship, writing and reading support and stimulating con- versations about work and about all sorts of other things. On Gotland is also Birgitta Gustafson, who I thank for always being enthusiastically curious and generously sup- portive, and the Impro group in Visby, which, during the final writing-up phase, fuelled my spirit. With immeasurable love and gratitude I thank my fabulous family: Vanja, Bosse, Inga, Jenny, Tomas, Hanna, Edvin, Margareta and Henrik, who always give me their unqualified support, and Bosse, with whom I sadly was unable to finish the inspiring and interesting discussions that we had started a few years before he, too early, passed away. I particularly want to acknowledge my parents for their genuinely positive way of thinking and their everlasting energy in solving practical problems and taking care of the little ones. You are invaluable! Invaluable and dearly loved are also my little men, Joel and Maurits, and Tomas, thank you for your unconditional encouragement and patience, for your attentiveness and careful reading. It is also to you I owe the aware- ness of the poetic possibilities in everyday life. Thank you all from the bottom of my heart!
10