FURTHER EDUCATION in SINGAPORE in 2000 The
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Compulsory Education
LAWS OF BRUNEI CHAPTER 211 COMPULSORY EDUCATION S 56/07 REVISED EDITION 2011 B.L.R.O. 7/2011 LAWS OF BRUNEI Compulsory Education CAP. 211 1 LAWS OF BRUNEI REVISED EDITION 2011 CHAPTER 211 COMPULSORY EDUCATION ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Section 1. Citation. 2. Interpretation. 3. Compulsory education. 4. Exemption. 5. Establishment and constitution of Board. 6. Period of office. 7. Meetings of Board. 8. Powers and duties of Board. 9. Penalties. 10. No person to be charged for offence except on complaint of Permanent Secretary. 11. Compounding of offences. 12. Protection from personal liability. 13. Operation of Act not to affect Chapter 210. 14. Regulations. ________________________ B.L.R.O. 7/2011 LAWS OF BRUNEI Compulsory Education CAP. 211 3 COMPULSORY EDUCATION ACT An Act to provide for compulsory education and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto Commencement: 24th November 2007 Citation. 1. This Act may be cited as the Compulsory Education Act. Interpretation. 2. In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires — “Board” means the Compulsory Education Board established by section 5; “child of compulsory school age” means a child above the age of 6 years who has not yet attained the age of 15 years and who satisfies such conditions for receiving primary and lower secondary education as the Permanent Secretary may determine; “Government school” means any institution for the provision of full-time primary or lower secondary education, being — (a) a school established and maintained exclusively by the Government; or (b) such other school as may be prescribed; “Minister” means the Minister of Education; “parent”, in relation to a child to whom section 3(1) applies, has the same meaning as in section 2 of the Education Act (Chapter 210); “Permanent Secretary” means the Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Education or any other officer appointed under section 4 of the Education Act (Chapter 210). -
Supporting Student-Athletes
Get in the Game Supporting Student Athletes SESSIONS Session Block 5: Thursday, July 11 1:45pm - 2:55pm Supporting Student-Athletes Panelists Matthew Bowie – Ridley College Jorge Delgado – Brandeis University Iain Harris – Northumbria University Samantha Jackson - EducationUSA Susan Whipple – Marquette University What is BUCS? • British Universities & Colleges Sport (BUCS) • National Governing body for Higher Education (HE) sport in the UK • Believed to be second largest HE sporting structure (behind US & Canada) • Membership Organisation (170 member institutions , 4800 teams, 100 championships) Vision is simple “enhance the student experience through sport” Key Differences Between US/UK Uni Athletics • No eligibility restrictions (3 year undergraduate degrees and 1 year postgraduate) • No age limit • No limit on number of Varsity teams per sport • 48 Varsity Sports • Varsity played alongside National Club activity • Very few ‘full-ride’ scholarships • All study abroad students are eligible to compete at Varsity level SIGNIFICANTLY MORE PLAYING OPPORTUNITIES FOR STUDENTS THAN IN THE U.S. ! Institution Points The BUCS System Loughborough 6578 • Any number of teams from Durham 4873 each sport (male/female) Edinburgh 4302 • Each team awarded points for Nottingham 4098 final league position and post Exeter 3435 season competition Bath 3429 • Points collated Birmingham 3168 Northumbria 3044 • Clear linear ranking (from c.200 Bristol institutions) 2676 Newcastle 2206 BUCS Sports • American Football • Golf • Rugby Union • Archery • Gymnastics -
EDUCATION in CHINA a Snapshot This Work Is Published Under the Responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD
EDUCATION IN CHINA A Snapshot This work is published under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of OECD member countries. This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. Photo credits: Cover: © EQRoy / Shutterstock.com; © iStock.com/iPandastudio; © astudio / Shutterstock.com Inside: © iStock.com/iPandastudio; © li jianbing / Shutterstock.com; © tangxn / Shutterstock.com; © chuyuss / Shutterstock.com; © astudio / Shutterstock.com; © Frame China / Shutterstock.com © OECD 2016 You can copy, download or print OECD content for your own use, and you can include excerpts from OECD publications, databases and multimedia products in your own documents, presentations, blogs, websites and teaching materials, provided that suitable acknowledgement of OECD as source and copyright owner is given. All requests for public or commercial use and translation rights should be submitted to [email protected]. Requests for permission to photocopy portions of this material for public or commercial use shall be addressed directly to the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) at [email protected] or the Centre français d’exploitation du droit de copie (CFC) at [email protected]. Education in China A SNAPSHOT Foreword In 2015, three economies in China participated in the OECD Programme for International Student Assessment, or PISA, for the first time: Beijing, a municipality, Jiangsu, a province on the eastern coast of the country, and Guangdong, a southern coastal province. -
Education: Free and Compulsory
Education Free & Compulsory Murray N. Rothbard Ludwig von Mises Institute Auburn, Alabama This work was originally published in the April and July–August 1971 issues of The Individualist, and then revised and published by the Center for Independent Education in 1979. This edition restores the original text. Thanks to MisesInstitute summer fellow Candice Jackson for editorial assistance, and to Institute Member Richard Perry for the index. Copyright © 1999 by The Ludwig von Mises Institute. All rights reserved. Written permission must be secured from the publisher to use or reproduce any part of this book, except for brief quotations in critical reviews or articles. The US government’s World War II school propaganda poster, reproduced on the cover, is an apt illustration of the State’s ideal for education. Published by the Ludwig von Mises Institute, 518 West Magnolia Avenue, Auburn, Alabama 36832-4528. ISBN: 0945466-22-6 TABLEOFCONTENTS The Individual’s Education . 1 Compulsory Education in Europe . 19 Compulsory Education in the United States . 37 iii Preface he central concern of social theory and policy in the new mil- lennium should be to redefine fundamentally the role of the Tstate in its relations to individuals, families, communities. This must also include a rethinking of the means, methods, and institutions most suitable for the education of the child. What urgently requires correction is today’s dramatic imbal- ance between families and the state. It is an imbalance that over- whelmingly favors the controlling power of the political sphere relative to that of parents and children to seek out educational set- tings that are best suited to the full educational development of the individual. -
The Supreme Court, Compulsory Education, and the First Amendment's Religion Clauses
University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship 1973 The Supreme Court, Compulsory Education, and the First Amendment's Religion Clauses Philip B. Kurland Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/journal_articles Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Philip B. Kurland, "The Supreme Court, Compulsory Education, and the First Amendment's Religion Clauses," 75 West Virginia Law Review 213 (1973). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. West Virginia Law Review Volume 75 April 1973 Number 3 THE SUPREME COURT, COMPULSORY EDUCATION, AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT'S RELIGION CLAUSES* PmLip B. KUpLAND** I. INTRODUCTION As a preliminary to my usual jeremiad about the work of the Supreme Court, I would like to set out what I consider to be some essential background against which the Court's decisions on schools and the religion clauses of the first amendment should be seen. I want to suggest that you consider, along with my proferred analysis of the decisions, the American idealization of the educational pro- cesses to which we have become committed and some of the counter- vailing forces that have been rampant in our history. It has long been an American dream that education affords the means for upward mobility in an open society. The Supreme Court - here as elsewhere a mirror of the American commonweal, a mirror that sometimes distorts the facts- has framed much of the country's constitutional law on the unstated premise that formal education is the means by which American society remains fluid yet cohesive, pluralistic yet unitary, aspiring to be a democracy while being governed by a meritocracy. -
Initiatives from Preschool to Third Grade a POLICYMAKER's GUIDE
FEB 2018 Initiatives From Preschool to Third Grade A POLICYMAKER'S GUIDE BRUCE ATCHISON LOUISA DIFFEY SPECIAL REPORT www.ecs.org | @EdCommission 2 he period between preschool and third grade is a tipping point in a Tchild’s journey toward lifelong learning — from “learning to read” Of the 2.5 million to “reading to learn.”1 If children do not have proficient reading skills by third grade, their ability to progress through school and meet grade-level students who dropped expectations diminishes significantly. While all areas of children’s learning and development are critical for school success, the predictive power of out of high school last a child’s third-grade reading proficiency on high school graduation and year, about 1.6 million dropout rates is startling.2 Consider: were firmly set on that J Children who are not reading proficiently by third grade are four times less likely to graduate from high school on time. trajectory when they were 8 years old. J If they live in poverty, they are 13 times less likely to graduate on time. J In 2016, they comprised more than half of all students (63 percent) who did not graduate on time. Pair that with the knowledge that about 30 percent of all fourth-graders and 50 percent of African-American and Hispanic fourth-graders nationwide are In 2016-17, 30 states reading below grade-level. Over half are likely to drop out or will not graduate on time. increased funding for If policymakers are to make a significant impact on the readiness of our pre-K, demonstrating nation’s future workforce, interventions and strategies to address gaps in overall support for learning must begin much earlier than third grade. -
Home School Best Practices
HOME SCHOOL INFORMATION PACKET AND BEST PRACTICE DOCUMENT Prepared by Christian Home Educators of Kentucky Kentucky Home Education Association and Kentucky Directors of Pupil Personnel August 21, 1997 Revised November 14, 2000 revised 11/14/2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. I. Background Information 1-8 A. Task Force 1 B. Rights of Parents/Guardians to Home School Their Children 2 C. Home School Requirements 2-3 D. Role of the Director of Pupil Personnel 3-4 E. Commentary on the Law and Its Application from the Home School 4-8 Perspective II. Best Practice Approach to Home School Verification 9-10 III. Appendix 11-16 A. Home School Resources 11-15 B. Special Topics 15-16 C. Sample Documents 17-23 revised 11/14/2000 I. Background Information A. Task Force On March 14, 1997 twelve home school representatives from Christian Home Educators of Kentucky (CHEK) and the Kentucky Home Education Association (KHEA) and twelve officers and board of directors of the Kentucky Directors of Pupil Personnel Association met to share their views on the status of home schools in Kentucky. From that meeting a task force was formed to address the issues that were raised at that meeting. The task force was comprised of: Joe Adams - Christian Home Educators of Kentucky Cheri Fouts - Kentucky Home Education Association Louie Hammons - Director of Pupil Personnel (Garrard County) Sherwood Kirk - Director of Pupil Personnel (Ohio County) David Lanier - Kentucky Home Education Association Marilann Melton - Director of Pupil Personnel (Warren County) Roger VonStrophe - Director of Pupil Personnel (Newport) Don Woolett - Christian Home Educators of Kentucky David Thurmond, Director of the Division of Planning, who is the nonpublic school liaison for the Kentucky Department of Education, served as a consultant to the task force. -
A*Star Talent Search and Singapore Science & Engineering Fair 2020 Contents
A*STAR TALENT SEARCH AND SINGAPORE SCIENCE & ENGINEERING FAIR 2020 CONTENTS 03 Singapore Science & Engineering Fair (SSEF) 05 Foreword by Mdm Lee Lin Yee Chairperson, Singapore Science & Engineering Fair 2020 Working Committee 07 Singapore Science & Engineering Fair (SSEF) 2020 Winners 33 A*STAR Talent Search (ATS) 35 Foreword by Prof Ho Teck Hua Chairperson, A*STAR Talent Search 2020 Awards Committee 37 A*STAR Talent Search (ATS) 2020 Finalists 45 Acknowledgements 47 A*STAR Talent Search and Singapore Science & Engineering Fair 2020 Participants SINGAPORE SCIENCE & ENGINEERING FAIR BACKGROUND SSEF 2020 The Singapore Science & Engineering Fair (SSEF) is a national 592 projects were registered online for the SSEF this year. Of these, competition organised by the Ministry of Education (MOE), 320 were shortlisted for judging in March 2020. The total number of the Agency for Science, Technology & Research (A*STAR) and awards for the Main Category was 117, comprising 27 Gold, 22 Silver, Science Centre Singapore. The SSEF is affiliated to the highly 33 Bronze and 35 Merit awards. Additionally, 47 projects were also prestigious Regeneron International Science and Engineering awarded Special Awards sponsored by six different organisations Fair (Regeneron ISEF), which is regarded as the Olympics of (Institution of Chemical Engineers Singapore, Singapore University science competitions. of Technology and Design, Singapore Society for Microbiology and Biotechnology, Yale-NUS College, The Electrochemical Society, and SSEF is open to all secondary and pre-university students Singapore Association for the Advancement of Science). between 15 and 20 years of age. Participants submit research projects on science and engineering. In the Junior Scientists Category (for students under 15 years of age), 49 projects were shortlisted at the SSEF this year. -
Press Release
PRESS RELEASE 31 Aug 2007 RESULTS OF THE DIRECT POLYTECHNIC ADMISSION (DPA) EXERCISE 1. The first Direct Polytechnic Admission (DPA) exercise, for admission into polytechnics in academic year 2008, commenced on 11 July 07 and ended on 16 Aug 07. Strong Interest in DPA Exercise 2. There was strong interest among students for the DPA exercise. A total of 5,090 students applied for direct admission into the polytechnics and 466 were offered places. 391 applicants, or about 85%, have accepted the offers. The offers cover a wide variety of disciplines, including business, engineering, sciences and social sciences. 3. In considering DPA applications from students, the polytechnics took into account a wide range of factors. In addition to the write-ups submitted through the DPA application portal, the polytechnics considered information such as the applicants’ school-based results, testimonials from teachers and CCA records. The polytechnics also interviewed short-listed applicants to further assess their talents and interests in the courses they applied for. For certain courses, such as the Creative Media Design course at Singapore Polytechnic, applicants were required to sit for specific aptitude tests. Admission of DPA Applicants into Polytechnics for AY08 4. Successful DPA applicants who have accepted their offers will be given places in the polytechnic courses that they have received offers for, as long as they meet the following conditions: (a) Obtain a net ELR2B21 score of not more than 26 points for the GCE ‘O’ level examinations; and (b) Meet the Minimum Entry Requirements (MER) for the polytechnic course that the student has been offered. -
Education in Singapore
EDUCATION IN SINGAPORE EDUCATION IN SINGAPORE 1 A part of Singapore’s success story The Singapore education Over system aims to help our An international students discover their 350 schools for mix of world-class talents, realise their potential, primary, higher learning and develop a passion for secondary institutions learning that lasts them and post- secondary Annual through their lives. education education supported budget of $10.6 This brochure provides an by 32,000 overview of the Singapore education billion in 2012 education landscape and officers explains the programmes and curricula available to cater to the students’ diverse aptitudes and interests. 2 EDUCATION IN SINGAPORE Holistic education Among the key strengths of the Singapore education system are our bilingual policy, emphasis on broad-based and holistic learning, focus on teacher quality and integration of information and communication technologies (ICT) into learning. We also believe that our schools should work closely with the parents and the community. Bilingual advantage Bilingualism is a key feature of Singapore’s education system. The main medium of instruction in school is English, but all students learn an official Mother Tongue Language. Our bilingual policy aims to equip our students with the language competencies to access Asian cultures and develop a global outlook. This will give our students a competitive edge, enable arts and sports through co-curricular programmes. them to appreciate their culture and heritage and Through these activities, our students are provided connect with people from different backgrounds, with opportunities to hone their talents and so that they can thrive in a globalised world. -
Education Statistics Digest 2020
Education Statistics Digest 2020 Moulding The Future of Our Nation CONTENTS Preface …………………………………………………………………………………..……. iv The Singapore Education Landscape (Infographics)...…………………………………... v Overview of Singapore’s Education System………………………..……………………... vi Key Educational Indicators ………………………………………………………………….. xvii SECTION 1: PRIMARY, SECONDARY AND PRE-UNIVERSITY EDUCATION Summary Statistics 1 Number of Schools by Level and Type …………………………………………… 2 2 Students, Education Officers and Education Partners in Schools by Level…… 2 3 Summary Statistics on Education Officers ………………………………………. 3 Enrolment Statistics 4 Enrolment, Number of Classes and Class Size by Level ……………………….. 4 5 Primary Enrolment by Age and Level …………….……………………………….. 6 6 Secondary Enrolment by Age, Level and Course ……………………….………. 8 7 Junior College / Centralised Institute Enrolment by Age and Level ……….…… 10 Education Officers’ Statistics 8 Teachers’ Length of Service and Age by Level…………………………………... 12 9 Vice-Principals’ Length of Service and Age by Level………………………….…. 13 10 Principals’ Length of Service and Age by Level ………………………………….. 14 Private Schools 11 Statistics on Private Schools ………...…………………….……………………… 15 SECTION 2: POST-SECONDARY EDUCATION 12 Intake, Enrolment and Graduates of ITE by Course …………………………….. 17 13.1 Intake, Enrolment and Graduates of LASALLE and NAFA by Course (Diploma)…………………………………………………………………….………... 18 13.2 Intake, Enrolment and Graduates of LASALLE and NAFA by Course (Degree) 19 14 Intake, Enrolment and Graduates of Polytechnics by Course …………………. 20 15 Intake, Enrolment and Graduates of Universities by Course …………………… 21 16 Employment Outcomes of Autonomous University Graduates………………… 23 17 Employment Outcomes of Polytechnic Fresh and Post-NS Graduates……… 24 18 Employment Outcomes of ITE Fresh and Post-NS Graduates……………….. 25 19 Employment Outcomes of Arts Institution Degree and Diploma Graduates……………………………………………………………..…………….. 26 SECTION 3: STATISTICAL SERIES 20 Number of Schools by Level and Type …………………………………....…… 30 21 Enrolment by Level and School Type .. -
Vol10iss2-Miller-PDFA.Pdf (240.5Kb)
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