Depoliticising Native Title Mediation, Uncertainty and the Extension of State Government Power in Western Australian Native Title Determinations
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Depoliticising Native Title Mediation, uncertainty and the extension of state government power in Western Australian native title determinations Benjamin H. Ripper This thesis is presented for the degree of Master of Arts of The University of Western Australia Discipline of Anthropology & Sociology School of Social Sciences 2013 ii Abstract The Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) (NTA) provides a statutory framework for Indigenous Australians to claim rights over their traditional land and waters. Claims are successful if these rights are deemed to have existed at sovereignty and survived post-sovereignty into the present. The Act was introduced as a result of the High Court Decision in Mabo and Others v Queensland (No. 2) (1992) and was met with by turns with celebration, confusion, consternation and fear. The subsequent push to federally legislate the decision was met with strong opposition from state governments and the mining lobby who demanded 'certainty' in granted land titles. After the NTA was enacted, the position of the Western Australian state government was to resolve native title claims via litigation and to continue to criticise the legislation as an un-workable threat to the state's economy. After 2000, attitudes to native title within government and business experienced a turn- around in which native title resolution has become an accepted part of the business landscape; resolution of native title via litigation was largely replaced by negotiated determinations by consent. The increase in mediation of native title claims has been accompanied by predominantly positive language from the Western Australian state government, native title respondents and Native Title Representative Bodies. In this thesis I argue that this positive language masks the realities of the mediation process, and that state government assessment of cultural evidence has led to reduced transparency in native title decision-making. The mediation policy has reduced uncertainty for the Western Australian state government and industry respondents, but has further entrenched the power imbalance between the Western Australian state government and native title applicants. I draw on the work of James Ferguson (1990) and Foucault's concept of 'governmentality' (Foucault 1978; Rose 1996; Lemke 2004) to reveal how the Western Australian state government has depoliticised native title decision- making. I examine how the Western Australian state government has exerted greater power over the native title process through its mediation regime than it has litigating native title claims in the Federal Court, and contextualise this within the Federal government's approach to native title policy. iii iv Candidate’s Declaration: The thesis is my own composition, all sources have been acknowledged and my contribution is clearly identified in the thesis. For any work in the thesis that has been co-published with other authors, I have the permission of all co-authors to include this work in my thesis. This thesis does not contain work that I have published, nor work under review for publication. The thesis has been substantially completed during the course of enrolment in this degree at UWA and has not previously been accepted for a degree at this or another institution. v vi Acknowledgments I want to whole-heartedly thank my primary supervisor Associate Professor Katie Glaskin for her commitment, knowledge and support for this thesis project from its very beginning. It simply would not have been possible without her input. Thanks also to my secondary supervisor Assistant Professor Debra McDougall who came onboard halfway through the project and contributed invaluable advice on structure, the presentation of ideas and suggestions for source material. I would also like to thank former supervisors Dr. Nicholas Smith, who provided excellent insights into NTRB perspectives on mediation, and Professor Victoria Burbank, whom helped greatly with administrative matters. Special thanks to good friend Dr. Mitchell Low who provided invaluable ‘fresh eyes’ on the thesis just prior to submission. I would like to thank my employers and colleagues at the State Benjamin Ripper ! 29/5/14 11:17 AM Solicitor's Office for their exceptional flexibility and for their respect for Deleted: " independent research. Finally, I would like to thank my partner Aimee Lamatoa Benjamin Ripper ! 29/5/14 11:17 AM for her love and support, and for always being there for a first read or first edit, Deleted: " day or night. vii viii Table of Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................... iii Benjamin Ripper ! 30/5/14 12:36 PM Candidate’s Declaration: ............................................................................................ v Deleted: ii Benjamin Ripper ! 30/5/14 12:36 PM Acknowledgments ...................................................................................................... vii Deleted: iv Table of Contents ......................................................................................................... ix Benjamin Ripper ! 30/5/14 12:36 PM Deleted: vi List of Tables ................................................................................................................. xi Benjamin Ripper ! 30/5/14 12:36 PM Glossary ....................................................................................................................... xiii Deleted: viii Benjamin Ripper ! 30/5/14 12:36 PM Chapter 1 - Introduction ............................................................................................. 1 Deleted: x Anthropology, native title and the state ........................................................................... 9 Benjamin Ripper ! 30/5/14 12:36 PM Anthropology and native title ........................................................................................................ 9 Deleted: xii The state, its actors, and anthropologies of power ............................................................. 14 Methodology ......................................................................................................................... 18 Project history and formation .................................................................................................... 18 Chapter 2 – Background .......................................................................................... 28 The Mabo decision – The beginning of uncertainty .................................................... 29 The Native Title Act, continued uncertainty and the move to mediate in Western Australia ................................................................................................................................ 34 Pathways to native title – An overview .......................................................................... 37 Chapter 3 – The Language of Mediation .............................................................. 49 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 49 The National Native Title Tribunal: ‘overwhelmingly positive’ .............................. 52 The Native title language of the Western Australian state governments 1993 - present ................................................................................................................................... 55 The Court Coalition government (1993-2001) ..................................................................... 56 The Gallop Labor government (2001-2006) ......................................................................... 59 The Carpenter Labor government (2006-2008) .................................................................. 63 The Barnett Liberal government (2008 - Present) .............................................................. 64 Federal Government, NTRBs and industry perspectives .......................................... 68 Federal government responses to agreement-making ....................................................... 68 The language of agreement-making in NTRBs ..................................................................... 71 Mining and pastoral industry responses ................................................................................ 74 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................ 77 Chapter 4 – Mediation: Results, Realities and Orthodoxy ............................... 79 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 79 The simplification of native title rights .......................................................................... 81 Modes of negotiation .......................................................................................................... 88 From public contest to opaque orthodoxy ..................................................................... 95 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................... 105 Chapter 5 – Power, Depoliticisation and Native Title ...................................... 108 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 108 The concept of a single state ‘intention’ .....................................................................