DOCSLIB.ORG

Lithuanian and Georgian Municipal Cooperation: Interest and Possibilities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lithuanian and Georgian Municipal Cooperation: Interest and Possibilities Lithuanian and Georgian municipal cooperation: interest and possibilities Arūnas Gražulis Adviser on EU issues Asscoation of Local Authorities in Lithuania Kachreti, 18/11/2013 Lithuanian municipal twinning links with Georgia * Poland: 119; * Germany – 64; * Latvia – over 50; * Russia – over 40; * Belarus – over 30; * Italy – nearly 30; * Georgia – 15… …every fourth Lithuanian municipality has its partner in Georgia Formalized twinning agreements Anykščiai District Telavi Cooperation agreement, 2010 Kaunas District Gori Protocol of intentions, 2012 Kupiškis District Lanchkhuti Protocol of intentions, 2009 Pasvalys District Čokhatauri Cooperation agreement, 2009 Rokiškis District Ozurgeti Cooperation agreement, 2010 Trakai District Mtskheta Cooperation agreement, 2012 Utena District Tkibuli Cooperation agreement, 2010 Vilnius City Tbilisi Cooperation agreement, 2009 Kazlų Rūda Oni Cooepraon agreement, 2013, TBS Survey of Lithuanian local authorities: interest in Georgia * High interest shown – over a half „would be interested in twinning“; * Over 10 coming with particular proposals; * Suggested cooperation between sub-municipal establishments; Areas of interest for cooperation * Culture, youth policy and sport; * Business promotion and local economy development; * Social policy; * Good practise exchanges in the field of administrative capacities; * Sustainable energy and local energy sources; * Urban planning, etc. Support instruments for municipal cooperation between Lithuania and Moldova * Lithuanian Development Cooperation; * Europe Aid; * Twinning; * US Aid; * Other international donors – trilateral format; Lithuanian development cooperation * Development cooperation programme launched in 2004 * Managed by Ministry of Foreign Affairs * Target countries: Afghanistan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova, Ukraine * Priorities for support: good governance, democracy, municipal cooperation, cultural connections Lithuanian development cooperation * Usually one annual call for proposals; * Additional calls by the embassies; * Small budgets; * One-year projects; * Simple application and reporting; * Expected municipal applications; * More information www.orangeprojects.lt, ge.mfa.lt/ and T. Abuladze 25, Tbilisi; Europe Aid * EU – largest international donor * EU and member states spend over 50 bln. Euro on development assistance * Annual EU DEVCO budget – over 3 bln. Euro * Most of the aid managed by Europe Aid – EU Development and Cooperation agency Local authorities in development cooperation * Special line of Europe Aid Development cooperation – NSA & LA in development cooperation; * Reserved for local authorities and NGO’s * Launched several times a year; * State-, region- or global- targeted; * Partnership between actors from EU member state and partner state Europe Aid calls: Georgia EuropeAid calls: Eastern Europe EuropeAid grants * Co-financing rate 75-90 percent of total eligible budget; * Projects budget 20,000 – 1,000,000 euro; * Duration – 18-36 months; * More information - Commission website http://www.delmda.ec.europa.eu/ * Commission Delegation: 38 Nino Chkheidze St. Tbilisi, 0102 Georgia * Telephone: (995 32) 294 37 63 / 294 37 69 * Fax: (995 32) 294 37 68 * E-mail: [email protected] Europe Aid technicalities * Call for proposals form the Europe Aid * Call for proposals from EU Representation * Three-level process: * - concept note; * - application; * - corrected application; * Compulsory registration of applicants in PADOR European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights * The EIDHR is a European Union programme that aims to promote and support human rights and democracy worldwide * Support for NGO cooperation and promotion of human rights * So far Georgia has earmarked 1.7 mln. euro from EIDHR * More information - http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/where/worldwide/eidhr/ index_en.htm TWINNING * EU-supported inter-institutional cooperation programme * Aim – fostering Euro-integration process in partner states; * Usually implemented between similar institutions in member state and partner state * 125 projects in Lithuania in 1998-2008 * Over 40 projects from Lithuania since 2007 * Moldova – food security * Potential of Lithuanian twinning experts in Moldovan decentralization reform? Other international donors: trilateral format * Combination of Western European donor support and recent transformation experience; * Practical arrangement: Georgian partner project with Western European partner (and funding from home source) + Lithuanian partner (as adviser about recent reforms); * Potential sponsors – MATRA, SIDA, Norwegian grants Thank you for attention! დიდი მადლობა ყურადღებისთვის! .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Electricity: 8700
    Covenant of Mayors 4 Climate & Energy Workshop on Data Solutions for Evidence- Based Policy and Stakeholder UNECE Webinar George Abulashvili COM Statistics for Georgia Signatories Population Akhaltsikhe 17,903 Lanchkhuti 31,486 Akhmeta 41,641 Mtskheta 7,800 Batumi 152,839 Ozurgeti 62,500 Bolnisi 53,590 Poti 41,465 Chokhatauri 19,001 Rustavi 125,103 Dedoplistskaro 21,221 Sagarejo 51,761 Gori 77,549 Sighnagi 29,948 Gurjaani 54,337 Tbilisi 1,108,717 Kutaisi 147,635 Telavi 38,721 Kazbegi 3,795 Tianeti 9,468 Kvareli 29,827 Zugdidi 62,511 Lagodekhi 41,678 Bagdati 29,2235 2 CNC’s ; 3 CTC’s and 3 CS’s 10 SE(C)Aps developed Georgian MDCP - Mayors Club Georgia • Analysis of barriers and drivers, Development of a National Roadmap (task 3.1.2) • Development of a Benchmark Database (task 3.1.3) • Development of a Project Pipeline (task 3.1.4) Number of Projects by Sectors 80 75 N of 70 SECAP Sectors Projects 60 Adaptation CC 0 50 EE in Buildings 12 40 Renewable energy 21 30 21 Street Lighting 75 20 12 Other (transport, …) 4 10 4 TOTAL 108 0 0 Adaptation CC EE in Buildings Renewable Street Lighting Other energy Number of municipalities implementing the projects -15; total number of CoM signatories - 24. Project Investments by Sectors, 1000 EUR 50,000 45,000 43379 40,000 Investments SECAP Sectors 000 EUR 35,000 Adaptation CC 0 30,000 EE in Buildings 8,538 25,000 Renewable energy 225 20,000 Street Lighting 1,509 15,000 Other (transport, …) 43,379 10,000 8538 TOTAL 53,651 5,000 1509 0 225 0 Adaptation CC EE in Buildings Renewable energy Street Lighting Other (transport, …) The huge figure in the “Other” sector is mainly due to the EBRD and EU E5P financing of the Tbilisi CNG bus project for 34 million euros.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Prosperity Initiative
    USAID/GEORGIA DO2: Inclusive and Sustainable Economic Growth October 1, 2011 – September 31, 2012 Gagra Municipal (regional) Infrastructure Development (MID) ABKHAZIA # Municipality Region Project Title Gudauta Rehabilitation of Roads 1 Mtskheta 3.852 km; 11 streets : Mtskheta- : Mtanee Rehabilitation of Roads SOKHUMI : : 1$Mestia : 2 Dushet 2.240 km; 7 streets :: : ::: Rehabilitation of Pushkin Gulripshi : 3 Gori street 0.92 km : Chazhashi B l a c k S e a :%, Rehabilitaion of Gorijvari : 4 Gori Shida Kartli road 1.45 km : Lentekhi Rehabilitation of Nationwide Projects: Ochamchire SAMEGRELO- 5 Kareli Sagholasheni-Dvani 12 km : Highway - DCA Basisbank ZEMO SVANETI RACHA-LECHKHUMI rehabilitaiosn Roads in Oni Etseri - DCA Bank Republic Lia*#*# 6 Oni 2.452 km, 5 streets *#Sachino : KVEMO SVANETI Stepantsminda - DCA Alliance Group 1$ Gali *#Mukhuri Tsageri Shatili %, Racha- *#1$ Tsalenjikha Abari Rehabilitation of Headwork Khvanchkara #0#0 Lechkhumi - DCA Crystal Obuji*#*# *#Khabume # 7 Oni of Drinking Water on Oni for Nakipu 0 Likheti 3 400 individuals - Black Sea Regional Transmission ZUGDIDI1$ *# Chkhorotsku1$*# ]^!( Oni Planning Project (Phase 2) Chitatskaro 1$!( Letsurtsume Bareuli #0 - Georgia Education Management Project (EMP) Akhalkhibula AMBROLAURI %,Tsaishi ]^!( *#Lesichine Martvili - Georgia Primary Education Project (G-Pried) MTSKHETA- Khamiskuri%, Kheta Shua*#Zana 1$ - GNEWRC Partnership Program %, Khorshi Perevi SOUTH MTIANETI Khobi *# *#Eki Khoni Tskaltubo Khresili Tkibuli#0 #0 - HICD Plus #0 ]^1$ OSSETIA 1$ 1$!( Menji *#Dzveli
    [Show full text]
  • 2.1.1～2.1.4 95/06/12
    Appendices Appendix-1 Member List of the Study Team (1) Field Survey 1. Dr. Yoshiko TSUYUKI Team Leader/ Technical Official, Experts Service Division, Technical Advisor Bureau of International Cooperation International Medical Center of Japan, Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare 2. Mr. Hideo EGUCHI Security Control Deputy Resident Representative, Planner United Kingdom Office (JICA) 3. Mr. Yoshimasa TAKEMURA Project Coordinator Staff, Second Management Division, Grant Aid Management Department (JICA) 4. Mr. Yoshiharu HIGUCHI Project Manager CRC Overseas Cooperation Inc. 5. Dr. Tomoyuki KURODA Health Sector Surveyor CRC Overseas Cooperation Inc. 6. Mr. Hiroshi MORII Equipment Planner CRC Overseas Cooperation Inc. 7. Mr. Haruo ITO Equipment Planner / CRC Overseas Cooperation Inc. Cost and Procurement Planner 8. Ms. Rusudan PIRVELI Interpreter CRC Overseas Cooperation Inc. (2) Explanation of Draft Report 1. Dr. Yoshiko TSUYUKI Team Leader/ Technical Official, Experts Service Division, Technical Advisor Bureau of International Cooperation International Medical Center of Japan, Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare 2. Mr. Yoshimasa TAKEMURA Project Coordinator Staff, Second Management Division, Grant Aid Management Department (JICA) 3. Mr. Yoshiharu HIGUCHI Project Manager CRC Overseas Cooperation Inc. 4. Mr. Hiroshi MORII Equipment Planner CRC Overseas Cooperation Inc. 5. Ms. Rusudan PIRVELI Interpreter CRC Overseas Cooperation Inc. A-1 Appendix-2 Study Schedule (1) Field Survey No. Date Movement Activities Accommodation 1 Apr. 5 (Sat) Narita→Frankfurt Frankfurt (A) (B) (D) (A) (C) (D) 2 Apr. 6 (Sun) Frankfurt→Baku Baku (A) (C) (D) (A) (C) (D) 3 Apr. 7 (Mon) Baku→A) (C) (D) Visit the Embassy of Japan in Baku Train (A) (C) (D) London→(B) (A) (C) (D) Flight (B) (F) (G) Narita→Vienna→ (F) (G) 4 Apr.
    [Show full text]
  • A Short Report on the Advisory Service for the Local Self-Government of Imereti and Guria Conducted by the Fund “Sukhumi” In
    A short report on the Advisory Service for the local self-government of Imereti and Guria conducted by the Fund “Sukhumi” in frames of the project "Experience of the Visegrad countries to advocate the equal, inclusive and democratic governance" From February to July 2018, the consultative group of the Fund "Sukhumi", consisting of 5 staff members, worked with 15 municipalities (12 municipalities of Imereti 3 municipalities of Guria) on the issues of gender policy of self-government, organization of work of local gender equality councils. The "Guide" of the Fund "Sukhumi" - "Introduction of Gender Mainstreaming in Local Authorities" was actively used in the work. A short review of the current situation: local governments gradually master the essence of gender policy and issues related to them. This is facilitated by the instructions of higher authorities, especially the Ministry of Regional Management and Infrastructure, on the recommendation of which, since January 2018, all the municipalities of Imereti and Guria have created gender equality councils, approved the provision of the councils (the remaining municipality – Sakrebulo of Vani, plans to approve the provision of the Gender Council within the next few days). Part of the Municipalities of Imereti and Guria, with the help of partner NGOs, began to work on local action plans for gender equality. In spite of the fact that the instructions indicated that this is not a plan of gender council, but of a municipality, several municipalities developed and approved an action plan of Gender Council (Kutaisi, Tskaltubo). At this stage development of an action plan for Gender Equality of the municipality is carried out.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Migration Profile of Georgia
    State Commission on Migration Issues 2019 Migration Profile of Georgia 2019 Tbilisi, Georgia Unofficial Translation State Commission on Migration Issues The European Union for Georgia This publication was produced in the framework of the project “Support to Sustained Effective Functioning of the State Commission on Migration Issues”, funded by the European Union. The contents of this publication in no way represent the views of the European Union. Contents List of Acronyms and Abbreviations1 Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Georgia, of the other part Assisted Voluntary Return and Reintegration Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA) between Georgia and EU “Enhancing Georgia’s Migration Management 2” European Migration Network /EC/ Statistical Office of the European Union GDP Gross Domestic Product National Statistics Office of Georgia Human Development Index International Centre for Migration Policy Development IDP Internally Displaced Person International Organization for Migration Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Georgia Ministry of Internal Affairs of Georgia Ministry of Education, Science, Culture And Sport of Georgia Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development of Georgia Ministry of Internally Displaced Persons from the Occupied Territories, Labour, Health and Social Affairs of Georgia National Agency of Public Registry Policy and Management Consulting Group Public Service Development Agency State Commission on Migration
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Hepatitis C Care Cascade in the Country of Georgia: Monitoring Progress Towards Elimination
    IVHEM 2019. November 22-23, 2019, Amsterdam EVALUATION OF THE HEPATITIS C CARE CASCADE IN THE COUNTRY OF GEORGIA: MONITORING PROGRESS TOWARDS ELIMINATION Tengiz Tsertsvadze,1,2 Amiran Gamkrelidze,3 Nikoloz Chkhartishvili,1 Akaki Abutidze,1 Lali Sharvadze,2,4 Maia Butsashvili,5 David Metreveli,6 Lia Gvinjilia,7 Shaun Shadaker,8 Muazzam Nasrullah,8 Tamar Gabunia, 9 Ekaterine Adamia,9 Stefan Zeuzem,10 Nezam Afdhal,11 Sanjeev Arora,12 Karla Thornton,12 Francisco Averhoff8 1Infectious Diseases, AIDS and Clinical Immunology Research Center, Tbilisi, Georgia; 2Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia; 3National Center for Disease Control and Public Health, Tbilisi, Georgia; 4Hepatology clinic HEPA, Tbilisi, Georgia; 5Health Research Union, Tbilisi, Georgia; 6Medical Center Mrcheveli, Tbilisi, Georgia; 7CDC Foundation, Tbilisi, Georgia; 8Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Viral Hepatitis National Center for HIV, Hepatitis, STD&TB Prevention, Atlanta, USA; 9Ministry of IDPs, Labour, Health and Social Affairs of Georgia, Tbilisi, Georgia; 10Goethe University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany; 11Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Liver Center, Boston, USA; 12University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, USA Infectious Diseases, AIDS and Clinical Immunology Research Center Disclosure No relevant financial relationship exists Infectious Diseases, AIDS and Clinical Immunology Research Center 12 COUNTRIES WORLDWIDE ON TRACK TO ELIMINATE HEPATITIS C INFECTION BY 2030 Georgia’s HCV elimination program builds on delivering
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia Program Maps 10/31/2008
    USG HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE TO GEORGIA 40° E 42° E The boundaries and names used on this map 44° E T'bilisi & Affected46° E Areas Majkop do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the U.S. Government. ADRA a SC Ga I GEORGIA CARE a UMCOR a Cherkessk CHF IC UNFAO CaspianA Sea 44° CNFA A UNICEF J N 44° Kuban' Counterpart Int. Ea USAID/Georgia Aa N Karachayevsk RUSSIA FAO A WFP E ABKHAZIA E !0 Psou IOCC a World Vision Da !0 UNFAO A 0 Nal'chik IRC G J Various G a ! Gagra Bzyb' Groznyy RUSSIA 0 Pskhu IRD I Various a ! Nazran "ABKHAZIA" Novvy Afon Pitsunda 0 Omarishara Mercy Corps Ca Various E a ! Lata Sukhumi Mestia Gudauta!0 !0 Kodori Inguri Vladikavkaz Otap !0 Khaishi Kvemo-gulripsh Lentekhi !0 Tkvarcheli Dzhvari RACHA-LECHKHUMI-RACHA-LECHKHUMI- Terek BLACK Ochamchira Gali Tsalenjhikha KVEMOKVEMO SVANETISVANETI RUSSIA Khvanchkara Rioni MTSKHETA-MTSKHETA- Achilo Pichori Zugdidi SAMEGRELO-SAMEGRELO- Kvaisi Mleta SEA ZEMOZEMO Ambrolauri MTIANETIMTIANETI Pasanauri Alazani Khobi Tskhaltubo Tkibuli "SOUTH OSSETIA" Anaklia SVANETISVANETI Aragvi Qvirila SHIDASHIDA KARTLIKARTLI Senaki Kurta Artani Rioni Samtredia Kutaisi Chiatura Tskhinvali Poti IMERETIIMERETI Lanchkhuti Rioni !0 Akhalgori KAKHETIKAKHETI Chokhatauri Zestafoni Khashuri N Supsa Baghdati Dusheti N 42° Kareli Akhmeta Kvareli 42° Ozurgeti Gori Kaspi Borzhomi Lagodekhi KEY Kobuleti GURIAGURIA Bakhmaro Borjomi TBILISITBILISI Telavi Abastumani Mtskheta Gurdzhaani Belokany USAID/OFDA DoD State/EUR/ACE Atskuri T'bilisi Î! Batumi 0 AJARIAAJARIA Iori ! Vale Akhaltsikhe Zakataly State/PRM
    [Show full text]
  • GEORGIA Second Edition March 2010
    WHO DOES WHAT WHERE IN DISASTER RISK REDUCTION IN GEORGIA Second edition March 2010 Georgian National Committee of Disaster Risk Reduction & Environment Sustainable Development FOREWORD Georgia is a highly disaster-prone country, which frequently experiences natural hazards (e.g. earthquakes, floods, landslides, mudflows, avalanches, and drought) as well as man-made emergencies (e.g. industrial accidents and traffic accidents). Compounding factors such as demographic change, unplanned urbanization, poorly maintained infrastructure, lax enforcement of safety standards, socio-economic inequities, epidemics, environmental degradation and climate variability amplify the frequency and intensity of disasters and call for a proactive and multi-hazard approach. Disaster risk reduction is a cross-cutting and complex development issue. It requires political and legal commitment, public understanding, scientific knowledge, careful development planning, responsible enforcement of policies and legislation, people-centred early warning systems, and effective disaster preparedness and response mechanisms. Close collaboration of policy-makers, scientists, urban planners, engineers, architects, development workers and civil society representatives is a precondition for adopting a comprehensive approach and inventing adequate solutions. Multi-stakeholder and inter-agency platforms can help provide and mobilize knowledge, skills and resources required for mainstreaming disaster risk reduction into development policies, for coordination of planning and programmes,
    [Show full text]
  • Realizing the Urban Potential in Georgia: National Urban Assessment
    REALIZING THE URBAN POTENTIAL IN GEORGIA National Urban Assessment ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK REALIZING THE URBAN POTENTIAL IN GEORGIA NATIONAL URBAN ASSESSMENT ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO) © 2016 Asian Development Bank 6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City, 1550 Metro Manila, Philippines Tel +63 2 632 4444; Fax +63 2 636 2444 www.adb.org Some rights reserved. Published in 2016. Printed in the Philippines. ISBN 978-92-9257-352-2 (Print), 978-92-9257-353-9 (e-ISBN) Publication Stock No. RPT168254 Cataloging-In-Publication Data Asian Development Bank. Realizing the urban potential in Georgia—National urban assessment. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank, 2016. 1. Urban development.2. Georgia.3. National urban assessment, strategy, and road maps. I. Asian Development Bank. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. This publication was finalized in November 2015 and statistical data used was from the National Statistics Office of Georgia as available at the time on http://www.geostat.ge The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by ADB in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. By making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area, or by using the term “country” in this document, ADB does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf | 281.89 Kb
    USG HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE TO GEORGIA 40° E 42° E 44° E The46° boundariesE and names used on this map Majkop do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the U.S. Government. Caspian GEORGIA Cherkessk Sea N N 44° 44° Kuban' T'bilisi & Affected Areas Karachayevsk RUSSIA CARE a Psou E !0 !0 Counterpart Int. a 0 Nal'chik FAO A ! Gagra Bzyb' Groznyy !0 Pskhu UMCOR a Novvy Afon Nazran Pitsunda !0 "ABKHAZIA" Omarishara UNICEF J Lata Mestia Gudauta!0 0 Sukhumi Kodori Inguri WFP ! Vladikavkaz Otap USAID/GeorgiaRUSSIA a !0 Khaishi Kvemo-gulripsh Lentekhi WFP a EF !0 Tkvarcheli Dzhvari RACHA-LECHKHUMI- Terek KVEMO SVANETI Ochamchira Gali Tsalenjhikha World Vision a Khvanchkara Rioni MTSKHETA- Achilo Pichori Zugdidi SAMEGRELO- Kvaisi Mleta ZEMO Ambrolauri MTIANETI Various a Pasanauri Alazani Khobi Tskhaltubo Tkibuli "SOUTH OSSETIA" Anaklia SVANETI Aragvi Qvirila SHIDA KARTLI Various E a BLACK Senaki Kurta Artani Rioni Samtredia Kutaisi Chiatura Tskhinvali Poti IMERETI Lanchkhuti Rioni !0 Akhalgori KAKHETI RUSSIA SEA Chokhatauri Zestafoni Khashuri N Supsa Baghdati Dusheti N 42° Kareli Akhmeta Kvareli 42° Ozurgeti Gori Kaspi Borzhomi Lagodekhi Kobuleti GURIA Bakhmaro Borjomi TBILISI Telavi Abastumani Mtskheta Gurdzhaani Belokany Atskuri T'bilisi Î! Batumi 0 AJARIA Iori ! Vale Akhaltsikhe Zakataly Khulo Rustavi Keda KVEMO KARTLI Tsnori Bolnisi !0 Akhalkalaki Marneuli Dedoplis Tsqaro SAMTSKHE-JAVAKHETI Dmanisi KEY Iori Coruh Ninotsminda Kura USAID/OFDA DoD State/EUR/ACE Mingachever !0 !0 Resevoir A AGRICULTURE AND FOOD SECURITY Rize a EMERGENCY RELIEF SUPPLIES TURKEY ARMENIA Kars EMERGENCY FOOD COMMODITIES AZERBAIJAN E LOGISTICS & TRANSPORTATION Arteni Lake INFORM NUTRITION IC AT F Sevan PH IO A N Î! R G U N O Yerevan E I WATER, SANITATION & HYGIENE T J 0 30 60 mi G Firat Aras N U N 8/27/08 S A 40° A 40°D 0 30 60 90 km I F D O 40° E 42° E 44° E 46° E / D C H A /.
    [Show full text]
  • Multifunctional Transshipment Terminal at Port of Poti, Georgia Updated Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
    TRANSFORD LLC Multifunctional Transshipment Terminal at Port of Poti, Georgia Updated Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Tbilisi 2015 Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 7 2 Updated ESIA ............................................................................................................... 8 3 Environmental and Social Objectives of the Report ..................................................... 10 4 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Methodology ....................................... 10 5 Legal and Regulatory Framework ................................................................................ 11 5.1 Georgian legislation .............................................................................................. 11 5.2 Environmental Standards in Georgia .................................................................... 15 5.3 Environmental Impact Assessment in Georgia ..................................................... 17 5.4 IFC Performance Standards ................................................................................. 18 5.5 International Conventions ..................................................................................... 19 5.6 Marine sediment quality guidelines ....................................................................... 20 5.7 Gaps between Georgian legislation and IFC requirements ................................... 21 6 Project Description .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Crisis of Secularism and Loyalty Towards the Dominant Group
    Human Rights Education and Monitoring Center (EMC) Crisis of Secularism and Loyalty towards the Dominant Group The Role of the Government in the 2012-2013 Religious Conflicts in Georgia Tbilisi 2013 1 The project is implemented in the framework of The East-West Management Institute’s (EWMI) Policy, Advocacy, and Civil Society Development in Georgia (G-PAC) Program, funded by United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The project is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the USAID. The content is the responsibility of Human Rights Education and Monitoring Center (EMC) and does not necessarily reflect the view of USAID, the United States Government, or EWMI. Author: Tamta Mikeladze Research team: Lina Ghvinianidze Dato Laghidze Giorgi Noniashvili Maia Barkaia Nino Guruli Editor: Sarah Delys Translators: Mariam Uberi Tatuli Chubabria The study was prepared and published by the Human Rights Education and Monitoring Center Tel.: (995 32) 223 15 58 E-mail: [email protected] Facebook: facebook.com/rightsemc 3 Shanidze st., Tbilisi 0179, Georgia Print run: 500 copies It is prohibited to reprint, copy or distribute the study for commercial purposes without written consent of the EMC 2 Contents Introduction................................................................................................................... 6 1. Research objective and methodology ......................................................................... 7 1.1 Research objective ................................................................ 7 1.2 Research methodology............................................................8 1.2.1 Instruments for collecting empirical data.............................8 1.2.2. Description of the study performed in Nigvziani, Tsintskaro and Samtskaro ......8 1.2.3. Instruments used for the processing the empirical data theoretically................9 2. Review of the religious conflict in Nigvziani Village.........................................................10 2.1.
    [Show full text]