DOCSLIB.ORG

Stratigraphy of the Project Area

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Stratigraphy of the Project Area I BRITISH &! COLUMBLA Ministry of Employment and Investment ENERGY AND MINERALS DIVISION Hon. Dan Miller. Minister Geological Survey Branch THE STIKINE PROJECT GEOLOGY OF WESTERN TELEGRAPH CREEK MAP AREA, NORTHWESTERN BRITISH COLUMBIA (NTS 104G/5,6, llW, 12 AND 13) By Derek A. Brown1 , Michael H. Gunning2 and Charles J. Greig3 Appendix 3 - Conodont identifications by "I. Orchard, Geological Survey of Canada 1. Geological Surve Branch, British Colunlhia Ministry of Employment andYlnvestment 2. Department of Geology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario 3. C.G. Greig and Associates Ltd., Penticton, B.C. BULLETIN 95 Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Brawn. Derek Anlhony. 1959- The Stikine project : geology of western Telegraph Creek map area. nonhwenlem British Columbia (NTS.lMG15. 6, IIW. 12and 13) Issued by Geological Survey Branch. Includes bibliographical references: p ISBN 0-7726-2502-6 1, Geology -British Columbia -Telegraph Creek Region 2. Geochemistry - British Columbia - Telegraph Creek VICTORIA Region. 3. Geology. Economic - British Columbia - BRITISH COLUMBIA Telegraph Creek Region. 4. Mines and mineral resources - CANADA British Columbia - Telegraph Creek Region. 1. Gunning. Michael H. 11. Greig.Charles James, 1956- . 111. British Columbia. Ministry of Employment and Investmenl. IV. MAY 1996 BritishColumbia. Geological Survey Branch. V. Title. VI. Title: Geology of western Telegraph Creek maparea, nanhwertern British Columbia (NTS 1WG15.6. 1 IW. 12 and 13). V11. Series: Bulletin (British Columbia. Ministry of Employment and Investment) ;95. QE187.B76 1996 557.11’185 (395-960208-9 Frontispiece. View north along the Scud Glacier. Ambition Mountainis underlain by Permian limestone and metavolcanic rocks. Ministry of Emp/oyment and Inveshent TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 Chemistry ...................... 45 INTRODUCTION ........................ 1 ContactRelationships ................ 45 Location. Access and Physiography ............Correlation and1 Age .................47 AboriginalFeatures .................... 2 EnvironmentDepositional ..............47 Previous Work ....................... 2 Eocene Sloko Group ...................47 ExplorationHistory .................... 4 Chemistry ...................... 48 Acknowledgments .....................Correlation and4 Age ................. 51 D epositional Environment 51 Environment Depositional .............. CHAFER 2 Miocene Or YounEer. (?) Flows .............51 I&GIONAL TECTONIC SETTING AND chemistry ...................... 51 STRATlGRAPHY ........................ 7 Age and Correlation ................. 51 Regional Tectonic Setting ................. 7 Quaternary ........................ 51 Stratigraphy of the Project Area .............. 7 CHAPTER 3 Paleozoic Stikine Assemblage ............... 7 INTRUSIVE ROCKS 53 UpperCarboniferous Strata .......... :.. 9 Devils Elbow Unit ................9 Regional Overview ................ 53 ButterflyUnit ................. I1 Middle(?).. to Late Triassic Plutons(228-220 Ma) 55 Chutine River Area ............... 13 Alaskan-type Ultramafites ..............55 Baninnton River andLink Tahltan Lake Mount Hickman Complex ...........57 I Areas .................. 13 Middle Scud Ultramafite ............ 57 U~wr.. Carboniferous to Lower Permian Strata ... 14 Yehiniko Ultramafite ..............57 Navo Formation ................ 14 Hickman Batholith .................. 57 Lower to Upper PermianStrata ........... 15 Hickman Pluton ................. 57 AmbitionFormation .............. 15 Nightout Pluton................. 58 ScudGlacier Formation ............ 17 Other Stikine Suite Plutons........... 58 RegionalCorrelations ................ 17 Late Triassic to Early Jurassic- Copper Paleoenvironmental Interpretation ......... 17 Mountain Plutonic Suite (210-195 Ma) ...... 59 Early Permianto Middle Triassic WimpsonUnit .... 18 ButterflyPluton ................... 59 Permo-Triassic Contact Relationships .......... 19 RuggedMountain Pluton .............. 59 Northeast of Devils Elbow Mountain ........ 20 ClinopyroxenitePhase ............. 61 Toe of Scud Glacier ................. 20 Syenite Phase ..................61 South of Scud Glacier ................ 20 Hybrid Phase .................. 61 North of the ChutineCulmination the of North .......... 20 Alkaline Dike Swarm.............. 61 Upper Triassic or Older Mafic Metavolcanic Rocks . 20 Latimer Lake and Damnation Plutons........ 61 Upper Triassic Stuhini Group ..............20 Early Jurassic Texas Creek Plutonic Camian to Lower Norian: Kitchener Unit ..... 21 Suite(189-195 Ma) .................62 Limestone Horiwns .............. 26 LimpokePluton ................... 62 Volcanic Facies Volcanic ................... 27 Pogue and Brewery Plutons............. 62 MaficVolcanic Rocks ............. 27 Pereleshin and Oksa Creek Plutons .........62 IntermediateVolcanic Rocks ......... 27 Early Jurassic(?) Diorite Intrusions ......... 63 TuffaceousWacke ............... 27 Late Eariy Jurassic Cone Mountain Intrusions Bladed-plagioclasePorphyry ......... 27 (187-180Ma) .............. 63 UpperNorian: Quattrin Unit ............ 28 Middle Jurassic Three Sisters Plutonic Chemistry and Tectonic Settingof the Stuhini Suite (177-170 Ma) ................. 64 Group. ..................... 30 YehinikoPluton ................... 64 Depsitional Environments ............. 33 NikoPluton ..................... 64 LowerMiddleto Jurassic Hazelton Group ....... 33 SaffronPluton .................... 64 Dacite Unit ...................... 34 ConoverPluton ................... 64 LimyWacke ..................... 35 Middle Jurassic Dike Swarms andDok Stocks ... 65 Andesite Flows andTuff .............. 35 Eocene Hyder Plutonic Suite (55-51 Ma) ........ 65 Rhyolite ....................... 37 ChristinaPluton ...................65 Basalt ........................ 37 SawbackPluton ................... 65 Chemistry ...................... 38 Hamper Pluton .................... 66 Contact Relationships between Jurassicand Oksa Creek Dike Swarm ............... 66 Triassic Units .................. 39 Tertiary(?) Granodiorite ............... 67 Age and Correlation ................. 39 Late Miocene (?)or Younger Dikes ........... 67 Depositional EnvironmentDepositional .............. 41 Geochemistry and Tectonic Discrimination of UpperCretaceous(?) to PaleoceneSustut Group .... 41 Intrusive Rocks ................... 68 ... Bullelin 95 Ill British Columbia Middle to Late Triassic ............... 68 Galore Creek ..................106 Alaskan-typeUltramafic Plutons ....... 68 RuggedMountain Pluton ...........106 StikineSuite .................. 70Pluton Limpoke ................ 106 Late Triassicto Early Jurassic Alkaline and MolybdenumDepositsPorphyry ..........106 U lnamafi~c Plutons Ulnamafi~c ...............70 AreaBenCreek .Deeker ...........106 Creek Suite Texas Creek .................. 70 MesothermalTransitionaland VeinDeposits ..... 106 ConeMountain Suite ................ 70 Early To Middle Jurassic ..............107 ThreeSisters Suite ................. 70 Yehiniko Fault Zone ..............107 HyderSuite ..................... 70 Northofthe StrataGlacierPluton ...... 107 Tectonic Discrimination. .............. 76 HelvekerCreek ................107 LateTriassic .................. 76 Conover Creek .................107 EarlyJurassic ................. 76 Scud Glacier Area ...............110 MiddleJurassic ................76 Area GlacierLimpoke .............110 Eocene ..................... 76 Eocene ....................... 110 Temporal Evolution of Plutons: the Orogenic Pendants in the Strata Glacier Pluton .... 110 Cycle .................. 76 North of the Strata Mountain Pluton ..... 110 Epithermal Vein Deposits ................111 CHAPTER 4 Volcanogenic Massive Sulphide Deposits ....... 111 STRUCKIREAND METAMORPHISM .......... 77 Skam Deposits ...................... 111 Tahltan Lake ..................... 111 Pre-lateTriassic Deformation ................78 Devil's Elbow .................... 111 PhyllosilicateFoliation ............... 81 Scud River ...................... 111 Developmentof Structural Culminations ..... 81 Other Deposit Types ...................113 Little Tahltan Lake Culmination ........ 81 PlacerGold ..................... 113 Barrington River Culmination ......... 81 Stratabound Uranium ................113 ChutineRiver Culmination .......... 81 Cumulate Magnetite .................113 AgeConstraintsandTahltanianOrogeny ... 82 Zming of Regional Metallogenic Events ....... 113 Post-Norian and Pre-Toarcian Contraction of Stuhini Paleozoic: Volcanogenic Massive Sulphide Group ....................... 84 Deposits .................... 113 AgeConstraints ................... 86 Late Triassic to Jurassic Porphyry Deposits and Structures near Scud Glacier Scud nearStructures ............86 Transitional to Epithermal Veins ........113 MiddleJurassicCretaceous or Contraction ....... 86 Early To Middle Jurassic: Volcanogenic Massive Folds .........................114 86Deposits Sulphide .............. ContractionalFaults ................. 88 Middle Jurassic: Calcalkaline Porphyry Deposits ConeMountain Fault .............114 88 VeinsTransitional and ............. Butterfly Lake and Related Faults ....... 89 Eocene: Epithermal to Transitional Veins. N avo Shear Zone Shear Navo ............... 89 Porphyry Molybdenum-copper Deposits ...114 A ge Constraints Age ................... 89 Galena-Lead Isotope Results ..............114 R egional Correlation Regional ................92 Exploration Activity ...................115 Faults .........................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Winter Newsletter — 2021
    Khaye Winter Newsletter — 2021 INTRODUCTION Message from the President . 1 Message from the Vice President . 3 Save the Dates . 4 COVID-19 Updates . 5 Memorandum of Understanding . 9 Tahltan Stewardship Initiative . 11 New Tahltans . 15 Condolences . 16 NEW STAFF Adam Amir – Director of Multimedia . 17 Ombrielle Neria – Communications Specialist . 18 TAHLTAN ONTRACK Tahltan OnTrack . 19 TahltanWorks becomes Tahltan OnTrack . 21 FEATURE Tahltan Nation & Silvertip Mine Impact-Benefit Agreement . .. 23 DIRECTORS’ REPORTS Lands – Nalaine Morin . 26 Wildlife – Lance Nagwan . 27 Fisheries – Cheri Frocklage . .. 29 Language – Pamela Labonte . 31 Culture & Heritage – Sandra Marion . 33 Education & Training – Cassandra Puckett . 35 Employment & Contracting – Ann Ball . 37 Membership & Genealogy – Shannon Frank . .. 38 Dease Lake Community – Freda Campbell . 39 PERSONAL PROFILES Elder – Allen Edzerza . 41 Culture – Stan Bevan . 42 Healthy Active Tahltans – Lane Harris & Brandi MacAulay . 43 Inspiring Young Tahltans – Megan Rousseau & Nathan Nole . 45 UPDATES TNDC Update . 47 Treaty 8 Update . 49 Contents 1910 Declaration of the Tahltan Tribe WE THE UNDERSIGNED MEMBERS OF THE TAHLTAN TRIBE, speaking for ourselves, and our entire tribe, hereby make known to all whom it may concern, that we have heard of the Indian Rights movement among the Indian tribes of the Coast, and of the southern interior of B.C. Also, we have read the Declaration made by the chiefs of the southern interior tribes at Spences Bridge on the 16th July last, and we hereby declare our complete agreement with the demands of same, and with the position taken by the said chiefs, and their people on all the questions stated in the said Declaration, and we furthermore make known that it is our desire and intention to join with them in the fight for our mutual rights, and that we will assist in the furtherance of this object in every way we can, until such time as all these matters of moment to us are finally settled.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis and Correlation of Growth
    ANALYSIS AND CORRELATION OF GROWTH STRATA OF THE CRETACEOUS TO PALEOCENE LOWER DAWSON FORMATION: INSIGHT INTO THE TECTONO-STRATIGRAPHIC EVOLUTION OF THE COLORADO FRONT RANGE by Korey Tae Harvey A thesis submitted to the Faculty and Board of Trustees of the Colorado School of Mines in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Geology). Golden, Colorado Date __________________________ Signed: ________________________ Korey Harvey Signed: ________________________ Dr. Jennifer Aschoff Thesis Advisor Golden, Colorado Date ___________________________ Signed: _________________________ Dr. Paul Santi Professor and Head Department of Geology and Geological Engineering ii ABSTRACT Despite numerous studies of Laramide-style (i.e., basement-cored) structures, their 4-dimensional structural evolution and relationship to adjacent sedimentary basins are not well understood. Analysis and correlation of growth strata along the eastern Colorado Front Range (CFR) help decipher the along-strike linkage of thrust structures and their affect on sediment dispersal. Growth strata, and the syntectonic unconformities within them, record the relative roles of uplift and deposition through time; when mapped along-strike, they provide insight into the location and geometry of structures through time. This paper presents an integrated structural- stratigraphic analysis and correlation of three growth-strata assemblages within the fluvial and fluvial megafan deposits of the lowermost Cretaceous to Paleocene Dawson Formation on the eastern CFR between Colorado Springs, CO and Sedalia, CO. Structural attitudes from 12 stratigraphic profiles at the three locales record dip discordances that highlight syntectonic unconformities within the growth strata packages. Eight traditional-type syntectonic unconformities were correlated along-strike of the eastern CFR distinguish six phases of uplift in the central portion of the CFR.
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for Canada (Alberta – VE6) Summits on the Air
    Summits on the Air – ARM for Canada (Alberta – VE6) Summits on the Air Canada (Alberta – VE6/VA6) Association Reference Manual (ARM) Document Reference S87.1 Issue number 2.2 Date of issue 1st August 2016 Participation start date 1st October 2012 Authorised Association Manager Walker McBryde VA6MCB Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged Page 1 of 63 Document S87.1 v2.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for Canada (Alberta – VE6) 1 Change Control ............................................................................................................................. 4 2 Association Reference Data ..................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Programme derivation ..................................................................................................................... 8 2.2 General information .......................................................................................................................... 8 2.3 Rights of way and access issues ..................................................................................................... 9 2.4 Maps and navigation .......................................................................................................................... 9 2.5 Safety considerations ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • RE-EVALUATION, Mileposts 149 to 161
    RE-EVALUATION, Mileposts 149 to 161 Interstate 25 Improvements through the Colorado Springs Area Environmental Assessment PALEONTOLOGY TECHNICAL MEMO April 2012 Prepared for: CDOT Region 2 Prepared by: Doug Eberhart, Telephone (719) 520-5800 Introduction The Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) has prepared this technical memorandum to update findings with regards to the paleontological resources described in the original 2004 I-25 Environmental Assessment (EA) with regard to the portion of the Proposed Action between Woodmen Road (Exit 149) in Colorado Springs and State Highway 105 in Monument (Exit 161). The purpose of the EA’s Proposed Action is to relieve existing traffic congestion and address project future congestion on I-25 within the Colorado Springs Urbanized Area. The I-25 EA originally evaluated impacts for the widening of I-25 between South Academy Boulevard (Exit 135) and SH 105, together with reconstruction of various I-25 interchanges within this corridor. Page 2-10 of the EA stated that, “Consistent with projected traffic demand in the I-25 corridor, the conceptual phasing for the Proposed Action calls for: (1) initially six-laning through central Colorado Springs, then (2) six-laning in northern El Paso Figure 1. I -25 EA Re -evaluation Project Vicinity County, and finally (3) adding HOV [High-Occupancy Vehicle] lanes through central Colorado Springs and widening to six lanes south to South Academy Boulevard.” For the year 2012, CDOT has received funding to begin the second phase, meaning to widen I-25 to six lanes in northern El Paso County. The EA calls for eventually widening I-25 all the way to SH105.
    [Show full text]
  • An#Integrated#Assessment#Of#The#Cumulative#Impacts#Of#Climate# Change'and'industrial'development'on'salmon'in'western'bc!! Stiki
    An#integrated#assessment#of#the#cumulative#impacts#of#climate# change'and'industrial'development'on'salmon'in'Western'BC!! Stikine and Upper Nass Current Social-Ecological Conditions Summary Prepared by: Christina Melymick, Consultant April 2013 The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the author and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions of the Bulkley Valley Research Centre or the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation. [email protected] • Box 4274 Smithers, BC V0J 2N0 Canada An#integrated#assessment#of#the#cumulative#impacts#of#climate#change#and#industrial#development#on#salmon#in#Western#BC#! Acknowledgements Thank you to the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation for supporting this project. Thank you to Jim Pojar for his expansive knowledge and expertise, and for adding to the stack of resources used during research. Thank you to Dave Bustard for taking time from a busy schedule to lend his extensive local knowledge and expertise. Thank you to John Kelson for his eulachon knowledge. Thank you to Richard Overstall for his knowledge and support. Thank you to Rick Budhwa for his support and contribution to the cultural aspects of this report. Thank you to Johanna Pfalz for her support and for providing all the relevant maps. Thank you to Ken Rabnett for support, his breadth of knowledge on the study area. Thank you to Don Morgan for the opportunity to carry out the research and produce this report, and for constant patience, guidance and support through the course of completing this report. Credits Don
    [Show full text]
  • Canadiantechnical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences No
    Variation in Biological Characters Among Sockeye Salmon Populations of the Stikine River with Potential Application for Stock Identification in Mixed-Stock Fisheries C. C. Wood, B. E. Riddell, D. T. Rutherford, and K. L. Rutherford Fisheries & Ccans Department of Fisheries and Oceans LIBP ARY Fisheries Research Branch Pacific Biological Station SEPi 1911: Nanaimo, British Columbia V9R 5K6 BIBLIO7 HÈQUE Pêc.:1:Ds Océins March 1987 Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences No. 1535 Fisheries Pêches I 4* and Oceans et Océans Canadua. Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Technical reports contain scientific and technical information that contributes to existing knowledge but which is not normally appropriate for primary literature. Technical reports are directed primarily toward a worldwide audience and have an international distribution. No restriction is placed on subject matter and the series reflects the broad interests and policies of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans, namely, fisheries and aquatic sciences. Technical reports may be cited as full publications. The correct citation appears above the abstract of each report. Each report is abstracted in Aquatic. Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts and indexed in the Department's annual index to scientific and technical publications. Numbers 1-456 in this series were issued as Technical Reports of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada. Numbers 457-714 were issued as Department of the Environment, Fisheries and Marine Service, Research and Development Directorate Technical Reports. Numbers 715-924 were issued as Department of Fisheries and the Environment, Fisheries and Marine Service Technical Reports. The current series name was changed with report number 925.
    [Show full text]
  • Stock Status and Escapement Goals for Salmon Stocks in Southeast Alaska Chapter 2: Sockeye Salmon
    This is Chapter 2 of "Stock Status and Escapement Goals for Salmon Stocks in Southeast Alaska," edited by Harold J. Geiger and Scott McPherson. The full text of that document is at: http://www.sf.adfg.state.ak.us/FedAidPDFs/sp04-02.pdf Chapter 2: Sockeye Salmon Stock Status and Escapement Goals in Southeast Alaska by Harold J. Geiger, Margaret A Cartwright, John H. Clark, Jan Conitz, Steven C. Heinl, Kathleen Jensen, Bert Lewis, Andrew J. McGregor, Renate Riffe, Gordon Woods, and Timothy P. Zadina ABOUT THE AUTHORS Harold J. Geiger is a fisheries biologist for the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Commercial Fisheries, P.O. Box 240020, Douglas, Alaska 99824. Margaret A Cartwright is a fisheries biologist for the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Commercial Fisheries, P.O. Box 240020, Douglas, Alaska 99824. John H. Clark is the Chief Fisheries Scientist for the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Commercial Fisheries, P.O. Box 240020, Douglas, Alaska 99824. Jan Conitz is a fisheries biologist for the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Commercial Fisheries, P.O. Box 240020, Douglas, Alaska 99824. Steven C. Heinl is a fisheries biologist for the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Commercial Fisheries, 2030 Sea Level Drive, Suite 205, Ketchikan, Alaska 99901. Kathleen Jensen is a fisheries biologist for the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Commercial Fisheries, P.O. Box 240020, Douglas, Alaska 99824. Bert Lewis is a fisheries biologist for the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Commercial Fisheries, 2030 Sea Level Drive, Suite 205, Ketchikan, Alaska 99901.
    [Show full text]
  • Abdullin Colostate 0053N 11378.Pdf (3.002Mb)
    THESIS GEOPHYSICAL CONSTRAINTS ON THE FLEXURAL SUBSIDENCE OF THE DENVER BASIN Submitted by Ayrat Abdullin Department of Geosciences In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Degree of Master of Science Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Fall 2012 Master’s Committee: Advisor: Dennis L. Harry Sven Egenhoff Michael Lefsky ABSTRACT GEOPHYSICAL CONSTRAINTS ON THE FLEXURAL SUBSIDENCE OF THE DENVER BASIN The Denver Basin is an asymmetric Laramide (Late Cretaceous through Eocene) foreland basin covering portions of eastern Colorado, northwestern Kansas, southwestern Nebraska, and southeastern Wyoming, USA. It is bordered on the west by the Rocky Mountain Front Range Uplift, a basement cored Laramide anticline bounded by thrust faults, and on the east by the Great Plains and stable North American craton. A ~400 mGal negative Bouguer gravity anomaly exists over the Denver Basin and Front Range Uplift, with its minimum located over the highest topography in the central part of the uplift, approximately 100 km west of the Denver Basin. This study examines three hypotheses concerning the isostatic state of the basin and adjacent Front Range Uplift. These hypotheses are that the modern shape of the basin is due to: 1) flexure of the lithosphere under the surface load of the current topography, or 2) flexure under a subsurface load beneath the Rocky Mountains, or 3) a combination of both surface and subsurface loads. To test these hypotheses, spectral analysis and forward gravity modeling was conducted along three profiles located in the northern, central, and southern parts of the basin. Bouguer gravity power spectra along the profiles reveal 5 major density interfaces interpreted to represent the base of the lithosphere (at depths of 132 to 153 km), base of the crust (45-55 km), a mid-crustal boundary (about 20 km), the top of Precambrian basement (1-2 km), and a boundary between the Pierre Shale and Niobrara Formations within the pre-Laramide sedimentary section (-1-0 km).
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphy of Cretaceous-Eocene Transition Beds in Eastern Montana and the Dakotas 1
    BULLETIN OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA VOL. 35. PP. 481-506, PLS. 23-25 SEPTEMBER 30, 1924 STRATIGRAPHY OF CRETACEOUS-EOCENE TRANSITION BEDS IN EASTERN MONTANA AND THE DAKOTAS 1 BY W. T. THOM, JR., AND C. E. DOBBIN (Presented before the Society December 28, 1923) CONTENTS Pago Introduction................................................................................................................... 4S1 Acknowledgments......................................................................................................... 483 Part I. Stratigraphy of the northern Plains...................................................... 483 General statement................................................................................................ 483 Lennep sandstone................................................................................................. 485 Fox Hills sandstone................................................................................................485 General statement....................................................................................... 485 Colgate sandstone member........................................................................ 490 Lance formation................................................................................................... 491 General statement........................................................................................ 491 Hell Creek member.....................................................................................491 Tullock member.......................................
    [Show full text]
  • 19Th Forum on Industrial Minerals Proceedings
    THESE TERMS GOVERN YOUR USE OF THIS DOCUMENT Your use of this Ontario Geological Survey document (the “Content”) is governed by the terms set out on this page (“Terms of Use”). By downloading this Content, you (the “User”) have accepted, and have agreed to be bound by, the Terms of Use. Content: This Content is offered by the Province of Ontario’s Ministry of Northern Development and Mines (MNDM) as a public service, on an “as-is” basis. Recommendations and statements of opinion expressed in the Content are those of the author or authors and are not to be construed as statement of government policy. You are solely responsible for your use of the Content. You should not rely on the Content for legal advice nor as authoritative in your particular circumstances. Users should verify the accuracy and applicability of any Content before acting on it. MNDM does not guarantee, or make any warranty express or implied, that the Content is current, accurate, complete or reliable. MNDM is not responsible for any damage however caused, which results, directly or indirectly, from your use of the Content. MNDM assumes no legal liability or responsibility for the Content whatsoever. Links to Other Web Sites: This Content may contain links, to Web sites that are not operated by MNDM. Linked Web sites may not be available in French. MNDM neither endorses nor assumes any responsibility for the safety, accuracy or availability of linked Web sites or the information contained on them. The linked Web sites, their operation and content are the responsibility of the person or entity for which they were created or maintained (the “Owner”).
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Characterization 111 Date 7/31/91 List of Appendices
    Characterization GEOLOGIC Prepared by ? TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ........................................... 1 1.2 Scope of Characterization .............................. 1 1.2.1 Literature Search .... ........................... 1 1.2.2 Core Processing and Description ..................... 2 1.2.3 Reprocessing of Seismic Data ........................ 2 1.2.4 Grain Size Analysis .............................. 2 1.2.5 Geologic Report ................................ 3 1.3 Location and General Setting ...., ........................ 3 1.4 Previous Studies ...................................... 5 2.0 STRATIGRAPHY ....................................... 7 Precambrian ......................................... 2.1 7 2.2 Paleozoic And Mesozoic Sedimentary Section ................ 2.2.1 Fountain Formation (PennsylvanianPermian) ............ 7 2.2.2 Lyons Sandstone Formation (Permian) ................ 7 2.2.3 Lykins Formation (PermianrTriassic) ................. 10 2.2.4 Ralston Creek Formation (Jiurassic) .................. 10 2.2.5 Momson Formation (Jurassic) ...................... 10 2.2.6 Dakota Group (Lower Cretaceous) ................... 10 2.2.7 Benton Shale Formation (Lower/Upper Cretaceous) ....... 11 2.2.8 Niobrara Formation (Upper Cretaceous) ............... 11 2.2.9 Pierre Shale Formation (Upper Cretaceous) ............. 11 2.2.10 Fox Hills Sandstone Formation (Upper Cretaceous) ....... 12 2.2.1 1 Laramie Formation (Upper Cretaceous) ............... 12 2.2.12
    [Show full text]
  • Population Structure of Lake-Type and River-Type Sockeye Salmon in Transboundary Rivers of Northern British Columbia
    Journal of Fish Biology (2004) 65, 389–402 doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2004.00457.x,availableonlineathttp://www.blackwell-synergy.com Population structure of lake-type and river-type sockeye salmon in transboundary rivers of northern British Columbia T. D. BEACHAM*, B. MC INTOSH AND C. MACC ONNACHIE Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Pacific Biological Station, Nanaimo, B. C., V9T 6N7, Canada (Received 6 October 2003, Accepted 22 April 2004) The population structure of ‘lake-type’ and ‘river-type’ sockeye salmon Oncorhynchus nerka, primarily in transboundary rivers in northern British Columbia, was examined with a survey of microsatellite variation. Variation at 14 microsatellite loci was surveyed from c. 3000 lake-type and 3200 river-type sockeye salmon from 47 populations in six river drainages in British Columbia. The mean FST for the 14 microsatellite loci and 47 populations was 0Á068, and 0Á034 over all river-type populations. River-type sockeye salmon were more genetically diverse than lake-type sockeye salmon, with expected heterozygosity of river-type sockeye salmon 0Á72 and with an average 12Á7 alleles observed per locus, whereas expected heterozygosity of lake-type sockeye salmon was 0Á65 with and average 10Á5 alleles observed per locus. River drainage of origin was a significant unit of population structure. There was clear evidence of genetic differentiation among river-type populations of sockeye salmon from different drainages over a broad geographic range in British Columbia. # 2004 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles Key words: genetic variation; microsatellites; population structure; sockeye salmon. INTRODUCTION Sockeye salmon Oncorhynchus nerka (Walbaum) can display considerable var- iation in life history.
    [Show full text]