DOCSLIB.ORG

The Right to Abandon

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

10_STRAHILEVITZ_FINAL.DOCX (DO NOT DELETE) 2/1/2010 6:34 PM ARTICLE THE RIGHT TO ABANDON † LIOR JACOB STRAHILEVITZ The common law prohibits the abandonment of real property. Perhaps it is surprising, therefore, that the following are true: (1) the common law generally permits the abandonment of chattel property, (2) the common law promotes the transfer of real property via adverse possession, and (3) the civil law is widely believed to permit the abandonment of real property. Because the literature on abandonment is disappointingly sparse, these three peculiarities have escaped sustained scholarly analysis and criticism. This Article aims to provide a com- prehensive analysis of the law of abandonment. After engaging in such an analysis, this Article finds that the common law’s flat prohibition on the aban- donment of corporeal interests in real property is misguided. Legal rules prohi- biting abandonment ought to be replaced with a more permissive regime in which both the value of the underlying resource and the steps that the abandon- ing owner takes to ensure that would-be claimants are alerted to the resource’s availability are what matters. Furthermore, the law of abandonment ought to be harmonized for real property and chattels. Finally, this Article criticizes the † Professor of Law and Walter Mander Teaching Scholar, University of Chicago Law School. The author thanks Sandra Lloyd and James Tierney for providing helpful family history concerning the Pocono Springs case; Eduardo Peñalver for his generous collegiality and insight as we each tried to make headway on the issue of abandon- ment; Adam Badawi, Douglas Baird, Shyam Balganesh, Eric Biber, Anu Bradford, Anupam Chander, Rosalind Dixon, Joel Dobris, Bob Ellickson, Chris Elmendorf, Lee Fennell, Tom Ginsburg, Bernard Harcourt, Paul Heald, Dick Helmholz, Alison La- Croix, Brian Leiter, Saul Levmore, Anup Malani, Jeremy Meisel, Adam Muchmore, Adam Samaha, Henry Smith, Madhavi Sunder, and Josh Tate; workshop participants at the University of Chicago, the University of California Davis, Washington University in St. Louis, and the University of Colorado’s Property Works in Progress Conference for helpful comments and suggestions; Ben Foster and Katie Heinrichs for energetic re- search assistance; and the Morton C. Seeley Fund and the John M. Olin Foundation for research support. (355) 10_STRAHILEVITZ_FINAL.DOCX (DO NOT DELETE) 2/1/2010 6:34 PM 356 University of Pennsylvania Law Review [Vol. 158: 355 law’s preference for adverse possession over abandonment as a means of trans- ferring title in cases in which these mechanisms might function as substitutes. In the course of analyzing the law of abandonment and offering a qualified defense of the practice, this Article provides the first workable definition of re- source abandonment, suggests that the abandonment of positive-value real and intellectual property is surprisingly widespread by providing multiple examples, and analyzes the costs and benefits associated with abandonment. This Article explores at some length the factors that will determine whether an owner opts for abandonment or other means for extinguishing his rights to a resource, as well as the considerations that should drive the law’s receptivity to these efforts. The latter considerations include the decision, transaction, decay, confusion, sustai- nability, and lawless-race costs associated with abandonment. In addition, readers will be exposed to pertinent tidbits concerning the social norms of geo- caching, the anthropology of “making it rain,” the unfortunate decline of mu- nicipal bulky-trash pickup, Mississippi’s misguided livestock laws, and the du- bious parenting choices of Jean-Jacques Rousseau. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................356 I. UNDERSTANDING ABANDONMENT .................................................360 A. Taxonomy of Abandoned Properties .................................... 362 B. Costs of Abandonment ...................................................... 372 C. Abandonment’s Comparative Appeal .................................. 375 II. THE LAW OF ABANDONMENT .........................................................390 A. Permissive Regimes ........................................................... 390 B. Escheat ........................................................................... 394 C. Prohibition ...................................................................... 398 D. Licensing ........................................................................ 402 E. Promoting Abandonment? ................................................. 404 III. A PROPOSAL FOR RATIONALIZING THE LAW OF ABANDONMENT ....405 A. Negative-Market-Value Property .......................................... 405 B. Positive-Market-Value Property ........................................... 407 C. Is Land Different? ............................................................ 412 CONCLUSION ..........................................................................................419 INTRODUCTION On an ordinary Wednesday in August of 2008, there were sixty- one separate listings in the “Free Stuff” section of Chicago’s Craigslist 10_STRAHILEVITZ_FINAL.DOCX (DO NOT DELETE) 2/1/2010 6:34 PM 2010] The Right to Abandon 357 directory.1 The belongings made freely available ranged from highly desirable items (an entertainment center in great condition, a work- ing “Gilbranson [sic] organ,” televisions, and microwave ovens) to those that might be useful to a niche population (a Hewlett-Packard inkjet cartridge, VHS tapes of the motion pictures Free Willy and Free Willy 2, and wooden doors from a colonial house built in 1938) to the nearly worthless (a broken refrigerator, one cubic yard of dirt from a landscaping project, and “Tons of River Rocks”). All were offered by their owners on a first-come, first-served basis. In most cases, the items were kept inside the owner’s home, and a claimant would need to make arrangements with the owner to haul off the property. But the owners were not picky—the first claimant with the ability to do so could take the advertised property home. In a few cases, such as that of the broken refrigerator, the item had been left by the owner in an alley or another easily accessible place, and the Craigslist advertise- ment described its location.2 Craigslist is hardly alone in pairing would-be abandoners with po- tential claimants. Another national organization, the Freecycle Net- work, offers a similar service with high levels of participation, and BookCrossing is a global service that facilitates the abandonment and finding of books. In recent years, communities of “freegans” have sprouted up in urban areas around the world, eating, cleaning, and wearing resources that other people have discarded.3 As a testament to the prevalence of abandonment and the value of the resources abandoned, it appears that some of these freegans are able to live es- sentially pleasant, middle-class lives.4 As the American economy has slid into a significant recession, states like Florida and South Carolina are dealing with hundreds of abandoned boats that are clogging local waterways, left by owners evidently unable to find buyers and unwilling to pay slip fees.5 Moreover, it is not only personal property that is widely abandoned. In rural, sparsely populated areas of Kansas, Ne- 1 Chicago Free Stuff Classifieds—Craigslist, http://chicago.craigslist.org/zip/ (Aug. 14, 2008) (on file with author). 2 See Posting to Chicago Free Stuff Classifieds—Craigslist, http://chicago. craigslist.org/chc/zip/795812089.html (Aug. 13, 2008) (on file with author) (stating that a broken refrigerator was available in the alley at “51st & Mobile”). 3 See Steven Kurutz, Not Buying It, N.Y. TIMES, June 21, 2007, at F1 (explaining the culture of “freegans,” who live off of consumer waste to minimize their support of cor- porations and their environmental impact). 4 See id. 5 David Streitfeld, Too Costly to Keep, Boats Become Castaways, N.Y. TIMES, Apr. 1, 2009, at A1. 10_STRAHILEVITZ_FINAL.DOCX (DO NOT DELETE) 2/1/2010 6:34 PM 358 University of Pennsylvania Law Review [Vol. 158: 355 braska, and North Dakota, local governments have made free land available to anyone willing to build a house on it and move in.6 In ur- ban centers, the problem of abandoned dwellings is significant, ac- counting for 23,000 dwelling units in New York City in 1996 and 1.3% of all urban residential housing units in fifty-eight cities in the nor- theastern United States in 1975.7 Given the ubiquity of abandoned property and its presumptive economic importance, one would expect there to be a large legal li- terature exploring the contours of abandonment law. Such a supposi- tion turns out to be unduly optimistic. There is very little legal writing on the abandonment of property. When legal scholars tackle the is- sue, they tend to focus on specific issues, like abandoned shipwreck cases, abandoned oil and gas interests, or abandoned rail lines.8 The leading property casebooks either ignore abandonment entirely or give it brief attention.9 For whatever reason, legal scholars have nearly 6 See, e.g., Laura Bauer, Trying to Halt the Population Slide: Towns Tout Free Land to Lure New Residents, KAN. CITY STAR, Jan. 29, 2007, at A1, available at 2007 WLNR 1679726 (detailing the free-land program in Kansas); Kansas Free Land, http:// www.kansasfreeland.com (last visited Nov. 15, 2009). 7 Benjamin P. Scafidi et al., An Economic Analysis of Housing
Recommended publications
  • Trial by Battle*

    Trial by Battle*

    Trial by Battle Peter T. Leesony Abstract For over a century England’s judicial system decided land disputes by ordering disputants’legal representatives to bludgeon one another before an arena of spectating citizens. The victor won the property right for his principal. The vanquished lost his cause and, if he were unlucky, his life. People called these combats trials by battle. This paper investigates the law and economics of trial by battle. In a feudal world where high transaction costs confounded the Coase theorem, I argue that trial by battle allocated disputed property rights e¢ ciently. It did this by allocating contested property to the higher bidder in an all-pay auction. Trial by battle’s “auctions” permitted rent seeking. But they encouraged less rent seeking than the obvious alternative: a …rst- price ascending-bid auction. I thank Gary Becker, Omri Ben-Shahar, Peter Boettke, Chris Coyne, Ariella Elema, Lee Fennell, Tom Ginsburg, Mark Koyama, William Landes, Anup Malani, Jonathan Masur, Eric Posner, George Souri, participants in the University of Chicago and Northwestern University’s Judicial Behavior Workshop, the editors, two anonymous reviewers, and especially Richard Posner and Jesse Shapiro for helpful suggestions and conversation. I also thank the Becker Center on Chicago Price Theory at the University of Chicago, where I conducted this research, and the Mercatus Center at George Mason University. yEmail: [email protected]. Address: George Mason University, Department of Economics, MS 3G4, Fairfax, VA 22030. 1 “When man is emerging from barbarism, the struggle between the rising powers of reason and the waning forces of credulity, prejudice, and custom, is full of instruction.” — Henry C.
  • How Copyright Law Affects Reissues of Historic Recordings: a New Study

    How Copyright Law Affects Reissues of Historic Recordings: a New Study

    TIM BROOKS How Copyright Law Affects Reissues of Historic Recordings: A New Study The following article looks at how U.S. copyright law affects the availability of older recordings. Among the issues covered are how many “historic” recordings are still under legal restrictions, how many are available to the public today via reissues, and what pro- portion of reissues are from rights holders vs. non rights holders. The article also suggests how to determine whether a specific older recording is controlled by a rights holder or is “abandoned,” and thus free to disseminate. The article is based on a paper presented at the 2005 ARSC Conference, with much of the information drawn from a study by the author commissioned by the Council on Library and Information Resources for the National Recording Preservation Board and the Library of Congress. The full study is available at www.clir.org. __________________________________________________________________________________ n recent years entertainment companies have secured sweeping expansion of copy- right laws and new limits on the public domain, making the subject of copyright Iincreasingly controversial. The world, they say, is changing and the law has to “keep up”. However, those who seek to care for and disseminate our recorded heritage feel jus- tifiably threatened by laws that seem to restrict their activities at every turn. While many in the academic and collecting communities lament these developments – witness the heavy attendance and passionate response at a session on “Music Downloading and File Swapping” at the 2004 ARSC Conference – there is surprisingly little solid data on the effects of current law on recordings.1 Such data is necessary to influence policymakers.
  • GLOSSARY for Principles of Title Insurance

    GLOSSARY for Principles of Title Insurance

    1 GLOSSARY The following materials represent a glossary of commonly used real estate terms reprinted, in part, from the First American Title Insurance Company Underwriting Library (with permission). This originally appeared in the first edition of “Principles of Title Insurance – Tennessee” and is reposted via a link in the second edition of that publication. A.L.T.A. American Land Title Association. Organization composed of title insurance firms which sets standards for the industry, including title insurance forms used on a national basis. ABATEMENT A reduction, a decrease, or a diminution. The suspension or cessation, in whole or in part, of a continuing charge, such as rent. ABSTRACT A brief summary of the important points of a given instrument. ABSTRACT CONTINUATION (Also known as abstract extension and also as supplemental abstract.) A partial abstract beginning at the terminal date of an existing abstract and showing instruments recorded between such terminal date and a subsequent date. ABSTRACT OF TITLE A summary of transactions affecting the title to a piece of land. ABUT To touch or border upon. A piece of land bordering on a street or an adjoining piece of property is said to abut such street or property. ACCELERATION CLAUSE A note, bond or other credit agreement clause advancing the date of maturity of a Deed of Trust or mortgage upon the happening of a certain event. ACCESS RIGHT Landowner's right to have ingress and egress from landowner's property to a public street. ACCOMMODATION An obligation assumed without consideration. ACCOMMODATION RECORDING The recordation of an instrument without an assumption of responsibility for the correctness or validity of the instrument.
  • Quia Emptores, Subinfeudation, and the Decline of Feudalism In

    Quia Emptores, Subinfeudation, and the Decline of Feudalism In

    QUIA EMPTORES, SUBINFEUDATION, AND THE DECLINE OF FEUDALISM IN MEDIEVAL ENGLAND: FEUDALISM, IT IS YOUR COUNT THAT VOTES Michael D. Garofalo Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS August 2017 APPROVED: Christopher Fuhrmann, Committee Chair Laura Stern, Committee Member Mickey Abel, Minor Professor Harold Tanner, Chair of the Department of History David Holdeman, Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences Victor Prybutok, Dean of the Toulouse Graduate School Garofalo, Michael D. Quia Emptores, Subinfeudation, and the Decline of Feudalism in Medieval England: Feudalism, it is Your Count that Votes. Master of Science (History), August 2017, 123 pp., bibliography, 121 titles. The focus of this thesis is threefold. First, Edward I enacted the Statute of Westminster III, Quia Emptores in 1290, at the insistence of his leading barons. Secondly, there were precedents for the king of England doing something against his will. Finally, there were unintended consequences once parliament passed this statute. The passage of the statute effectively outlawed subinfeudation in all fee simple estates. It also detailed how land was able to be transferred from one possessor to another. Prior to this statute being signed into law, a lord owed the King feudal incidences, which are fees or services of various types, paid by each property holder. In some cases, these fees were due in the form of knights and fighting soldiers along with the weapons and armor to support them. The number of these knights owed depended on the amount of land held. Lords in many cases would transfer land to another person and that person would now owe the feudal incidences to his new lord, not the original one.
  • Abandoning Copyright

    Abandoning Copyright

    Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons Faculty Publications 2020 Abandoning Copyright Dave Fagundes Aaron K. Perzanowski Case Western University School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/faculty_publications Part of the Intellectual Property Law Commons Repository Citation Fagundes, Dave and Perzanowski, Aaron K., "Abandoning Copyright" (2020). Faculty Publications. 2060. https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/faculty_publications/2060 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. ABANDONING COPYRIGHT Dave Fagundes* & Aaron Perzanowski** For nearly two hundred years, U.S. copyright law has assumed that owners may voluntarily abandon their rights in a work. But scholars have largely ignored copyright abandonment, and the case law is fragmented and inconsistent. As a result, abandonment remains poorly theorized, owners can avail themselves of no reliable mechanism to abandon their works, and the practice remains rare. This Article seeks to bring copyright abandonment out of the shadows, showing that it is a doctrine rich in conceptual, normative, and practical significance. Unlike abandonment of real and chattel property, which imposes significant public costs in exchange for discrete private benefits, copyright abandonment is potentially costly for rights holders but broadly beneficial for society. Nonetheless, rights holders—ranging from lauded filmmakers and photographers to leading museums and everyday creators—make the counterintuitive choice to abandon valuable works. This Article analyzes two previously untapped resources to better understand copyright abandonment.
  • The Origins of Property in England Robert C

    The Origins of Property in England Robert C

    College of William & Mary Law School William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository Faculty Publications Faculty and Deans 1985 The Origins of Property in England Robert C. Palmer Repository Citation Palmer, Robert C., "The Origins of Property in England" (1985). Faculty Publications. 901. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/facpubs/901 Copyright c 1985 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/facpubs The Origins of Property 1n England Robert C. Palmer The English common law of real property, as S.F.C. Milsom has argued, took shape between 1153 and 1215. 1 The common law gave royal protection to free tenements, replacing feudal relationships as the primary bond structuring society. The law thus constituted the institutional core of the Robert C. Palmer is the Adler Fellow of the Institute of Bill of Rights Law and Assistant Professor of Law at the Marshall-Wythe School of Law, The College of William and Mary. Various versions of this paper have been given, notably at the University of Chicago Law School, the New York University seminar in law and history, and the Sixth British Legal History Conference. The criticisms at those meetings have proved uniformly helpful. This article was written with the aid of a summer research grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities. I would like to thank Kathleen Crotty, my research assistant at Marshall­ Wythe. I. The short forms for frequently cited works, primary and secondary respectively, are the following: Bracton: Henry de Bracton, De Legibus et Consuetudinibus Angliae, ed.
  • The Nature of Land Ownership and the Protection of the Purchaser

    The Nature of Land Ownership and the Protection of the Purchaser

    Afe Babalola University: Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy Vol. 1 Iss. 1 (2013) pp. 1-20 THE NATURE OF LAND OWNERSHIP AND THE PROTECTION OF THE PURCHASER Clement C Chigbo* ABSTRACT This article examines the nature of ownership of land and derivative or subordinate real- rights under English law drawing some comparison with Romanic-Dutch ownership while arguing that the Anglo-American estate’ or interest’ in land is a mere semantic conundrum. It is the position of this writer that the concept of ownership in English law of real property, which dominantly influences our real property law in Nigeria and other common law jurisdictions such as the Bahamas and Jamaica, has not brought the desirable clarity to our real property jurisprudence/practice in Nigeria. The unfortunate problems faced by purchasers of real estate in some common law jurisdiction are also briefly examined in this article. The article seeks to advance a solution to these problems and in this context the writer strongly suggests that a land registration system of some model should be adopted in Nigeria and the Bahamas to protect purchasers of real estates and guarantee greater security of title and clarity in our conveyancing practice. INTRODUCTION Land is elemental. It is where life begins and it is where life ends. Land provides the physical substratum for human activity; it is the essential base of all social and commercial interaction. Land law is, accordingly, that part of the law which governs the allocation of rights and obligations in relation to ‘real’ or ‘immovable’ property. We spend scarcely a moment out of contact with terra firma and our very existence is constantly sustained and shaped by the natural and constructed world around us.
  • The Medieval English Marriage Portion from Cases of Mort D'ancestor and Formedon

    The Medieval English Marriage Portion from Cases of Mort D'ancestor and Formedon

    Volume 38 Issue 4 Article 2 1993 The Medieval English Marriage Portion from Cases of Mort D'Ancestor and Formedon C.M.A. McCauliff Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/vlr Part of the Property Law and Real Estate Commons Recommended Citation C.M.A. McCauliff, The Medieval English Marriage Portion from Cases of Mort D'Ancestor and Formedon, 38 Vill. L. Rev. 933 (1993). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/vlr/vol38/iss4/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Villanova Law Review by an authorized editor of Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. McCauliff: The Medieval English Marriage Portion from Cases of Mort D'Ancest 1993] THE MEDIEVAL ENGLISH MARRIAGE PORTION FROM CASES OF MORT D'ANCESTOR AND FORMEDON C.M.A. MCCAULIFF* I. THE MARRIAGE PORTION AND THE WRIT OF MORT D 'ANCESTOR .......................................... 935 A. Definition of the Phrase "seised as offee" ............. 936 B. On Whose Seisin Should the Demandant Claim? ........ 941 C. Problems Arising From Subsequent Alienation ........... 947 D. Pleading in a Case of Mort d'Ancestor ................. 951 E. Choice of Mort d'Ancestor or Formedon ................ 956 F. Reversions after a Marriage Portion ................... 962 II. THE MARRIAGE PORTION AND THE WRITS OF FORMEDON 968 A. History of the Writs of Formedon ..................... 969 B. Counts for the Writs of Formedon ..................... 981 C. The ConditionalFee and Writs of Formedon: Choice of W rits Revisited ..................................... 990 III. CONCLUSION ...........................................
  • Trial by Battle

    Trial by Battle

    TRIAL BY BATTLE Peter T. Leeson1 Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jla/article/3/1/341/857953 by guest on 01 October 2021 ABSTRACT For over a century England’s judicial system decided land disputes by ordering disputants’ legal representatives to bludgeon one another before an arena of spectating citizens. The victor won the property right for his principal. The van- quished lost his cause and, if he were unlucky, his life. People called these combats trials by battle. This paper investigates the law and economics of trial by battle. In a feudal world where high transaction costs confounded the Coase theorem, I argue that trial by battle allocated disputed property rights efficiently. It did this by allocating contested property to the higher bidder in an all-pay auction. Trial by battle’s ‘‘auctions’’ permitted rent seeking. But they encouraged less rent seek- ing than the obvious alternative: a first-price ascending-bid auction. ‘‘When man is emerging from barbarism, the struggle between the rising powers of reason and the waning forces of credulity, prejudice, and cus- tom, is full of instruction.’’ —Henry C. Lea, Superstition and Force (1866, 73). 1. INTRODUCTION Modern legal battles are antagonistic and acrimonious. But they aren’t lit- 1 erally battles. Disputants don’t resolve conflicts with quarterstaffs. Their lawyers don’t fight to the death. This wasn’t always so. For more than a century England’s judicial system decided land disputes by ordering dispu- tants’ legal representatives to bludgeon one another before an arena of spectating citizens. The victor won the property right for his principal.
  • New Strategies for Owners of Discontinued Brands David S

    New Strategies for Owners of Discontinued Brands David S

    Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property Volume 3 Article 4 Issue 1 Fall Fall 2004 New Strategies for Owners of Discontinued Brands David S. Ruder Recommended Citation David S. Ruder, New Strategies for Owners of Discontinued Brands, 3 Nw. J. Tech. & Intell. Prop. 61 (2004). https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njtip/vol3/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern Pritzker School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property by an authorized editor of Northwestern Pritzker School of Law Scholarly Commons. NORTHWESTERN JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY New Strategies for Owners of Discontinued Brands David S. Ruder Fall 2004 VOL. 3, NO. 1 © 2004 by Northwestern University School of Law Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property Copyright 2004 by Northwestern University School of Law Volume 3, Number 1 (Fall 2004) Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property New Strategies for Owners of Discontinued Brands By David S. Ruder* I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................61 A. Why Brands Are Discontinued ...........................................................62 B. Why Discontinued Brands Matter.......................................................63 1. Potential Loss of Control to Competitor ...................................63 2. Potential Lost Value ..................................................................64
  • DRAFT Damages As the Appropriate Remedy for “Abuse” of an Easement: Moving Toward Consistency, Efficiency, and Fairness in P

    DRAFT Damages As the Appropriate Remedy for “Abuse” of an Easement: Moving Toward Consistency, Efficiency, and Fairness in P

    DRAFT Damages as the Appropriate Remedy for “Abuse” of an Easement: Moving Toward Consistency, Efficiency, and Fairness in Property Law Lee J. Strang1 I. Introduction The current majority position—what I will label the American rule2—is that the proper remedy for “abuse” or “misuse”3 of an easement is an injunction. In this Article, I argue that courts should move away from this position and adopt instead a rule permitting courts to award damages when two conditions are met: (1) where the dominant tenant’s servicing of nondominant land does not pose an unreasonable burden on the servient estate;4 and (2) the cost to the dominant tenant of ceasing his servicing of nondominant land is substantially greater than the benefit to the servient tenant.5 I call this the Brown rule after the Washington Supreme Court case, Brown v. Voss, where it found its most prominent statement.6 A remedy of damages instead of an injunction, under these circumstances, fits well with earlier case law, builds on courts’ equitable authority and concomitant case law, accords with the broader movement in property law from property to contract concepts and remedies, and is more efficient and fair. 1 All Rights Reserved. I would like to thank my loving wife Elizabeth for her sacrifice to allow me to write this Article, Ed Lyons and Lou Mulligan for their comments and suggestions, Travis Comstock and Katherine Badder for their research assistance, and Michigan State University College of Law for research support for this Article. 2 As described below, this will distinguish the current majority position of American states from what I label the English rule under which courts would hold that the dominant tenant had forfeited the easement because of his misuse.
  • Family, Land and Inheritance in Late Medieval Wales: a Case Study of Llannerch in the Lordship of Dyffryn Clwyd

    Family, Land and Inheritance in Late Medieval Wales: a Case Study of Llannerch in the Lordship of Dyffryn Clwyd

    FAMILY, LAND AND INHERITANCE IN LATE MEDIEVAL WALES: A CASE STUDY OF LLANNERCH IN THE LORDSHIP OF DYFFRYN CLWYD LLINOS BEVERLEY SMITH Aberystwyth ABSTRACT The presence or absence of a bond or attachment between a family and the land in its possession is an issue which has generated much debate in studies of the societies of late medieval England. But it is an issue which has remained relatively unexplored by students of medieval Wales. Using the rich documentary resources of the lordship of Dyffryn Clwyd and the voluminous and informative records of the commote of Llannerch in particular, this study explores the influences which promoted or discouraged the formation or persistence of such bonds. It argues that whereas in the conditions of the late fourteenth and fifteenth centuries familial attachment to land was compromised in several important respects, continuity of familial possession was, nevertheless, an important characteristic of Llannerch society. To what extent the experience of Llannerch was replicated in other regions of Wales is an issue which deserves further study. Was Llannerch and, indeed, the lordship of Dyffryn Clwyd, distinctive, or is it rather that its sources allow the issue to be confronted and analysed in far greater detail than is possible for other Welsh medieval societies? Welsh History Review/Cylchgrawn Hanes Cymru, 27/3 (2015) 418 FAMILY, LAND AND INHERITANCE IN LATE I The presence or absence of a strong bond between a family and the land in its possession is an issue which has been comprehensively studied by numerous historians of pre-industrial societies both in England and, more widely, in Europe, even if the influences and conditions which promoted or discouraged the existence of such ‘familial’ or ‘sentimental’ attachments are also matters of vigorous debate.