Dracut Housing Production Plan 2020-2024
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
MASSACHUSETTS: Or the First Planters of New-England, the End and Manner of Their Coming Thither, and Abode There: in Several EPISTLES (1696)
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Joshua Scottow Papers Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln 1696 MASSACHUSETTS: or The first Planters of New-England, The End and Manner of their coming thither, and Abode there: In several EPISTLES (1696) John Winthrop Governor, Massachusetts Bay Colony Thomas Dudley Deputy Governor, Massachusetts Bay Colony John Allin Minister, Dedham, Massachusetts Thomas Shepard Minister, Cambridge, Massachusetts John Cotton Teaching Elder, Church of Boston, Massachusetts See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scottow Part of the American Studies Commons Winthrop, John; Dudley, Thomas; Allin, John; Shepard, Thomas; Cotton, John; Scottow, Joshua; and Royster,, Paul Editor of the Online Electronic Edition, "MASSACHUSETTS: or The first Planters of New- England, The End and Manner of their coming thither, and Abode there: In several EPISTLES (1696)" (1696). Joshua Scottow Papers. 7. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scottow/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Joshua Scottow Papers by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Authors John Winthrop; Thomas Dudley; John Allin; Thomas Shepard; John Cotton; Joshua Scottow; and Paul Royster, Editor of the Online Electronic Edition This article is available at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ scottow/7 ABSTRACT CONTENTS In 1696 there appeared in Boston an anonymous 16mo volume of 56 pages containing four “epistles,” written from 66 to 50 years earlier, illustrating the early history of the colony of Massachusetts Bay. -
The Beginning of Winchester on Massachusett Land
Posted at www.winchester.us/480/Winchester-History-Online THE BEGINNING OF WINCHESTER ON MASSACHUSETT LAND By Ellen Knight1 ENGLISH SETTLEMENT BEGINS The land on which the town of Winchester was built was once SECTIONS populated by members of the Massachusett tribe. The first Europeans to interact with the indigenous people in the New Settlement Begins England area were some traders, trappers, fishermen, and Terminology explorers. But once the English merchant companies decided to The Sachem Nanepashemet establish permanent settlements in the early 17th century, Sagamore John - English Puritans who believed the land belonged to their king Wonohaquaham and held a charter from that king empowering them to colonize The Squaw Sachem began arriving to establish the Massachusetts Bay Colony. Local Tradition Sagamore George - For a short time, natives and colonists shared the land. The two Wenepoykin peoples were allies, perhaps uneasy and suspicious, but they Visits to Winchester were people who learned from and helped each other. There Memorials & Relics were kindnesses on both sides, but there were also animosities and acts of violence. Ultimately, since the English leaders wanted to take over the land, co- existence failed. Many sachems (the native leaders), including the chief of what became Winchester, deeded land to the Europeans and their people were forced to leave. Whether they understood the impact of their deeds or not, it is to the sachems of the Massachusetts Bay that Winchester owes its beginning as a colonized community and subsequent town. What follows is a review of written documentation KEY EVENTS IN EARLY pertinent to the cultural interaction and the land ENGLISH COLONIZATION transfers as they pertain to Winchester, with a particular focus on the native leaders, the sachems, and how they 1620 Pilgrims land at Plymouth have been remembered in local history. -
Firefighter Statue Debuts in Dudley
Free by request to residents of Webster, Dudley and the Oxfords SEND YOUR NEWS AND PICS TO [email protected] Friday, June 26, 2020 Firefighter statue Dudley voters debuts in Dudley approve budget BY JASON BLEAU enterprise funds. The uses in their projects, CORRESPONDENT budget was considered essentially allowing for a conservative spending residential-only develop- DUDLEY – More than plan taking into account ments on a case-by-case 90 Dudley voters turned the current circumstanc- basis. Applicants would out for the town’s 2020 es under the COVID-19 need approval from the spring annual town meet- pandemic and received Board of Selectmen and ing on Monday, June no vocal opposition from Planning Board to affirm 22, where the proposed voters making it one of such a waiver under the 2021 fiscal year budget the easiest votes of the bylaw changes. received overwhelming night. The proposal had vot- support but a proposal A more controversial ers split down the mid- to amend a zoning bylaw subject however came dle with some seeing it as pertaining to the mill immediately after the an opportunity to loosen conversion overlay dis- budget vote as residents restrictions to allow for trict proved to be more were asked whether or a wider range of uses for divisive topic. not to approve an amend- the mill while others felt Residents voted 72-18 ment to the zoning bylaw it was being proposed to approve a $21,081,882 for the mill conversion specifically to satisfy town budget that includes overlay district to allow one company, Camden $8,863,480 in the gener- for developers of the prop- Partners, who are plan- al fund and $9,895,971 erties within the district ning the redevelopment in education spending. -
Natural Resources Chapter
Natural Resources Chapter Comprehensive Plan Inventory & Analysis Adopted: May 20, 2006 Amended: November 5, 2013 November 6, 2007 Planning Board of York, Maine at time of chapter adoption: Glen MacWilliams, Chair Tom Manzi, Vice Chair Barrie Munro, Secretary Lee Corbin David Woods Lewis Stowe, Alternate ENACTMENT BY THE LEGISLATIVE BODY Date of Town vote to enact this Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan: ______________. Certified by the Town Clerk: _________________________________ on ___________. (signature) (date) Comprehensive Plan – York, Maine TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1 II. ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................................ 3 A. A GIFT FROM THE ICE AGE ........................................................................................ 3 1. Physical Resources..................................................................................................... 3 2. The Water ..................................................................................................................... 3 3. The Air ........................................................................................................................... 4 4. Living Resources ......................................................................................................... 4 B. NATURAL RESOURCE VALUES WE ENJOY ......................................................... -
CITY of LAWRENCE 2009 OPEN SPACE and RECREATION PLAN
CITY OF LAWRENCE 2009 OPEN SPACE and RECREATION PLAN Prepared by Groundwork Lawrence for The City of Lawrence Community Development Department Table of Contents Section 1: Executive Summary ........................................................................................................... 1 Section 2: Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 2 Section 3: Community Setting ............................................................................................................ 3 Section 4: Environmental Inventory and Analysis ............................................................................ 11 Section 5: Inventory of Lands of Conservation and Recreation Interest ......................................... 24 Section 6: Community Vision............................................................................................................ 33 Section 7: Analysis of Need .............................................................................................................. 35 Section 8: Goals and Objectives ....................................................................................................... 42 Section 9: Seven Year Action Plan .................................................................................................... 43 List of Appendices Appendix A: Maps Appendix B: Meeting Notes Appendix C: Survey Results Appendix D: Outreach Appendix E: Regional and Local Trail Initiatives Appendix F: Natural -
Zoning By-Law (PDF)
ZONING BY-LAW of the TOWN OF CLINTON Re-Codified by Town Meeting June 18, 2001 with Amendments to June 4, 2018 TOWN OF CLINTON ZONING BY-LAW Re-Codified by Town Meeting on June 18, 2001 With Amendments to June 4, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1000. PURPOSE AND 3300. HOME OCCUPATIONS AUTHORITY 3310. Home Occupation - As of Right 1100. PURPOSE 3320. Home Occupation - By Special Permit 1200. AUTHORITY 3400. ACCESSORY APARTMENTS 1300. SCOPE 3410. Purpose 1400. APPLICABILITY 3420. Procedure 1500. AMENDMENTS 3430. Conditions 1600. SEPARABILITY 3440. Decision 3500. [RESERVED] SECTION 2000. DISTRICTS 3600. NONCONFORMING USES AND STRUCTURES 2100. ESTABLISHMENT 3610. Applicability 2200. OVERLAY DISTRICTS 3620. Nonconforming Uses 2300. MAP 3630. Nonconforming Structures 2310. Rules for Interpretation of Zoning District Boundaries 3640. Variance Required 2320. Amendment 3650. Nonconforming Single and Two Family Residential Structures 3660. Abandonment or Non-Use SECTION 3000. USE REGULATIONS 3670. Reconstruction after Catastrophe or 3100. PRINCIPAL USES Demolition 3110. Symbols 3680. Reversion to Nonconformity 3120. If Classified Under More than One Use 3700. Temporary Moratorium on Medical Marijuana 3130. Table of Use Regulations Treatment Centers (repealed) 3200. ACCESSORY USES 3750. Temporary Moratorium on Marijuana Establishments and the Sale or Distribution of 3210. Permitted Accessory Uses in All Districts Marijuana and Marijuana Products (repealed) 3220. Nonresidential Accessory Uses 3800. Temporary Moratorium on Multi-Family 3230. Residential Accessory Uses Dwelling Units 3240. Prohibited Accessory Uses 3.2 B Existing Lots (2019) TOWN OF CLINTON ZONING BY-LAW TABLE OF CONTENTS i SECTION 4000. DIMENSIONAL 5330. Temporary Signs REGULATIONS 5340. Off-Premises Signs 4100. GENERAL 5350. Signs in the R1 or R2 District 4110. -
Staff Report
TOWN OF SMITHFIELD, RHODE ISLAND PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Smithfield Town Council will hold a virtual Public Hearing on Tuesday, April 20, 2021 at 6:00 PM. The purpose of the Public Hearing is to consider and obtain public input on a proposed amendment to the Housing chapter of the Comprehensive Community Plan. This amendment is proposed in accordance with the provisions of Section 45-22.2-8 of the General Laws of Rhode Island. VIRTUAL MEETING* Please join the meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone. https://www.gotomeet.me/RandyRossi/smithfield-towncouncil You can also dial in using your phone. United States (Toll Free): 1 877 568 4106 United States: +1 (646) 749-3129 Access Code: 342-830-965 For technical support dial: 401-233-1010 *Provided, however, that the meeting is allowed to be held virtually. If virtual meetings are prohibited on this date, then the Town Council may convene the meeting at the Smithfield Town Hall, 2nd Floor, Crepeau Hall, 64 Farnum Pike, Smithfield, RI, pursuant to compliance with the latest Executive Order dealing with public meetings. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Summary: The proposed amendment involves a complete rewrite of the Housing section including the Introduction; Data and Trends Snapshot; Types of Housing Development; Housing Costs; Housing Trends; Special Needs; Housing Problems and Needs; Zoning for Residential Uses; Smithfield’s Housing Agencies and Programs; Rehabilitation of Existing Building Stock for Residential Purposes; Low-Moderate Income Housing Data and Trends; Low and Moderate Income Housing Strategies, including the removal of Table H-25 which lists selected properties for LMI housing development; Implementing the Strategies; Goals, Policies; and, Actions; and, Implementation. -
The Rise of White-Segregated Subsidized Housing May 2016
The Rise of White-Segregated Subsidized Housing May 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Subsidized housing in Minneapolis and Saint Paul is segregated, and this segregation takes two forms – one well-known, and the other virtually unknown. At this point it is widely recognized that most Minneapolis and Saint Paul subsidized housing is concentrated in racially diverse or segregated neighborhoods, with few subsidized or otherwise- affordable units in affluent, predominately white areas. Because subsidized units are very likely to be occupied by families of color, this pattern increases the region’s overall degree of segregation. But what has been overlooked until today, at least publicly, is that a small but important minority of subsidized projects are located in integrated or even-predominately white areas. Unlike typical subsidized housing, however, the residents of these buildings are primarily white – in many instances, at a higher percentage than even the surrounding neighborhood. These buildings thus reinforce white residential enclaves within the urban landscape, and intensify segregation even further. What’s more, occupancy is not the only thing distinguishing these buildings from the average subsidized housing project. They are often visually spectacular, offering superior amenities – underground parking, yoga and exercise studios, rooftop clubrooms – and soaring architecture. Very often, these white-segregated subsidized projects are created by converting historic buildings into housing, with the help of federal low-income housing tax credits, historic tax credits, and other sources of public funding. Frequently, these places are designated artist housing, and – using a special exemption obtained from Congress by Minnesota developers in 2008 – screen applicants on the basis of their artistic portfolio or commitment to an artistic craft. -
Aug 2 9 2003 Libraries
Mill And Mercantile Conversions: A Case Study Analysis of Residential Adaptive Re-Use Projects by Zach E. Schaumburg B.S., Advertising, 1998 University of Colorado, Boulder Submitted to the Department of Architecture in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Real Estate Development at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology September, 2003 0 2003 Zach Schaumburg All rights reserved The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part. Signature of Author De me t of Architecture August , 2003 Certified by _ Peter Koth Lecturer, Department of Architecture Thesis Supervisor Accepted by (-----"David Geltnf' Chairman, Interdepartmental Degree Program in Real Estate Development MASSACHUSEU115INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AUG 2 9 2003 LIBRARIES Mill And Mercantile Conversions: A Case Study Analysis of Residential Adaptive Re-Use Projects by Zach E. Schaumburg Submitted to the Department of Architecture on August 4, 2003 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Real Estate Development ABSTRACT The demand for housing, both affordable and market rate has remained high, particularly in dense urban areas. This thesis will consider the conversion of mill or mercantile buildings to urban lofts or condominium residences. First, a brief overview of the housing market, supporting demographics, and current trends is provided including a discussion of market driven design, size, layout, and amenities common to these urban residences. Three case studies are used as a qualitative tool to analyze the successful conversion of these types of buildings. -
Historic and Archeological Resources Chapter
Historic and Archeological Resources Chapter Comprehensive Plan Inventory & Analysis November 6, 2007 Planning Board of York, Maine Glen MacWilliams, Chair Tom Manzi, Vice Chair Barrie Munro, Secretary Lee Corbin David Woods Lewis Stowe, Alternate ENACTMENT BY THE LEGISLATIVE BODY Date of Town vote to enact this Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan: ______________. Certified by the Town Clerk: _________________________________ on ___________. (signature) (date) TABLE OF CONTENTS A. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................1 B. THE HISTORIC CHARACTER OF YORK..................................................................................... 2 C. ARCHEOLOGICAL AND HISTORIC INSTITUTIONS................................................................. 4 1. HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION ................................................................................................... 4 2. YORK HISTORIC MARKERS COMMITTEE.......................................................................................... 5 3. OYHS AND ITS PREDECESSORS ..................................................................................................... 5 4. MAINE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION.............................................................................. 6 D. INVENTORY OF RESOURCES ...................................................................................................... 7 1. HISTORIC MAPS .............................................................................................................................. -
Lower Merrimack River Corridor Management Plan
Lower Merrimack River Corridor Management Plan Preparedby: Onbehalfof: LowerMerrimackRiverLocalAdvisoryCommittee May2008 TheNashuaRegionalPlanningCommissionwishestoexpresstheirthanksandappreciationtotheNew HampshireDepartmentofEnvironmentalServicesforboththefinancialandstaffsupportusedincompletingthis managementplan.FinancialassistancewasprovidedthroughsettlementfundsfromtheNewHampshire DepartmentofEnvironmentalServices,HazardousWasteComplianceBureau,WasteManagementDivision. WewouldalsoliketothankthemembersoftheLowerMerrimackRiverLocalAdvisoryCommitteefortheir leadership,volunteerism,andcontinueddedicationtoMerrimackRiverandsurroundingcommunities. KarenArchambault JimBarnes StanKazlouskas GeorgeMay GlennMcKibben KathrynNelson RayPeeples BobRobbins CynthiaRuonala CoverPhotoCredit: JoeDrapeau,Bedford,NH FromPhotographersForum Lower Merrimack River Corridor Management Plan May 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 CORRIDOR PLAN PURPOSE AND NEED .......................................................................1 1.1 Purpose and Need for the Plan...............................................................................................................1 1.2 Scope of the Plan.......................................................................................................................................2 1.2.1 Description of the Corridor Area.................................................................................................2 1.3 Priority Management Issues....................................................................................................................5 -
Hardwick Zoning Bylaw I 7.2 Flood Plain District
HARDWICK, MASSACHUSETTS ZONING BYLAW ADOPTED MAY 17, 2012 AMENDED JUNE 16, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 GENERAL ............................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Authority. ............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.3 Basic Requirements ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.4 Definitions ........................................................................................................................................... 1 1.5 Non-Conforming Properties and Uses ................................................................................................. 7 1.5.1 Continuation and Change ............................................................................................................. 7 1.5.2 Non-Conforming Uses and Structures .......................................................................................... 8 2.0 ESTABLISHMENT OF DISTRICTS ..................................................................................................... 9 2.1 Classes of Districts .............................................................................................................................