Bills of Lading 5 - Cargo Claimants’ Rights and Liabilities

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Claims Guides Bills of Lading 5 - Cargo Claimants’ Rights and Liabilities Disputes may occur at the discharge port between owners and cargo interests. Cargo interests will often claim What is the contract of carriage? which charter party applies as a matter against the owners under the bills of construction, and if they do not have Owners should check which of lading, as the contract of carriage. this already, obtain a full copy of it. The documents comprise the terms The intention of this note is to provide answer may not be straightforward if and conditions of the contract of owner Members with some general there are multiple charter parties. carriage, and ensure they have all the guidance on the key issues to consider documents containing such terms to Under English law, there is a presumption when such claims are presented. Such hand. Is the bill of lading the contract that if the parties to a bill of lading issues include what obligations cargo of carriage or are the terms contained neglect to insert the date of the interests may have with regards to in another document? applicable charter party, or insert an the cargo, and what recourse owners incorrect reference (i.e. to a charter party may have against cargo interests or In order to check what the contract that does not exist) the head time charter Charterers, if cargo interests behave of carriage is, consideration should party will apply and be incorporated, unreasonably with respect to delivery be given to the relationship of the because this is the charter party to which of the cargo. parties involved. the owner is a party (unless the vessel is If a claim is asserted against owners (i) Relationship between Cargo demise chartered). as the carrier under a bill of lading, Receiver and Carrier: This presumption is displaced if there owners should consider the standing A transferrable bill of lading may be is a sub voyage charter party, in which of the parties involved, whether the transferred from a person with title, case the sub voyage charter party is the bill of lading is indeed the correct to a person without title i.e. from a applicable charter, because this is more document to determine the contractual consignee named in the bill of lading closely connected with the carriage of relationship between the owners and to a consignee not named in a bill the goods and the particular voyage the party making the claim. of lading. This allows trading of the performed under the bill of lading. goods on the voyage. Owners should seek to obtain a copy of the sub voyage charter to check A transferable bill of lading will be the terms as soon as possible. The the contract of carriage as between a presumption is also displaced if the bill carrier and a cargo receiver, to whom of lading is a charterers’ bill, in which the original bill of lading has been case the charterer is the carrier. lawfully transferred. Owners should also consider the Owners should ensure they obtain a wording of the incorporation clause in complete copy of the original bill of the bills of lading. General words of lading (both front and back pages) to incorporation check the terms, and any incorporated documents, such as the applicable (i.e. “all terms, conditions…”) are only charter party, including the applicable capable of incorporating the germane law and jurisdiction provisions or any terms of a charter party, such as those agreement for arbitration. relating to loading, carrying, discharge and payment of freight. Terms which (ii) Applicable terms referenced have no connection to the carriage in a bill of lading: of the cargo, or onerous terms, such Owners should check whether any as demurrage obligations and liens, charter party terms are said to be are not likely to be incorporated. incorporated into the bill of lading: is Ancillary clauses, such as entire a specific charter party referenced agreement clauses, will generally not (usually by date) in the incorporation be incorporated into a bill of lading clause? If not, owners need to consider Claims Guides unless specifically mentioned. There the master’s signature is likely to bind and a person shall be regarded for the must also be specific express wording the demise charterer. purposes of this Act as having become to incorporate a jurisdiction clause or the lawful holder of a bill of lading Pursuant to the Hague and Hague-Visby an arbitration agreement; a statement wherever he has become the holder of Rules the carrier will be a named party that all terms are incorporated is the bill in good faith. in the contract of carriage and this not sufficient to incorporate these could be the owners or charterers; the Often a party who brings a claim provisions. carrier is not necessarily the physical against the carrier and may even (iii) Relationship between carrier. The distinction may not be so arrest the ship is not the lawful holder a shipper and a carrier: important in some jurisdictions where of the bill of lading, and may be, for the receiver may pursue a claim against example, the buyer of the cargo under In the case of the contractual the owner as the physical carrier as well a sale contract, who has not received relationship between a shipper and a as the named carrier under the bills of by way of transfer or indorsement a carrier, the bill of lading will generally lading. The Hamburg Rules impose a right to assert a claim under the bill only be evidence of the contract of joint and several liability on the named of lading. carriage. This is because the contract carrier and the actual physical carrier. of carriage will have been arranged The fact that the claimant is a However the determination of the prior to the issue of the bill of lading, party to a sale contract does not applicable law and jurisdiction for a and other documents, such as a necessarily mean he is the lawful cargo claim, in each case, will be fact booking note or fixture note may be holder of the bill of lading. specific, the scope of which is not relevant to determine the terms agreed covered in this article. The distinction is important. The sale between a shipper and carrier. contract determines title to the goods, Where the shipper is also the Do the claimants have title to sue? but this is immaterial to the transfer charterer, the contract of carriage of contractual rights under a bill of The contract of carriage will assist with will be the charter party and the bill lading. “Title” in the context of bills identifying whether the claimants have of lading itself has no contractual of lading means the right to receive title to sue. Where the bill of lading is effect. However the bill of lading will possession of the goods from the the contract of carriage, only the lawful still serve as evidence of receipt of carrier. The lawful holder of a bill of holder of a bill of lading is the party to the goods, and will still function as a lading is entitled to take delivery of the the contract of carriage with the carrier, document of title, if transferable. goods upon surrender of the original and has title to sue the carrier. bill of lading, and the carrier has no Once the terms of the contract of Under English law, section 5(2) of the obligations to deliver the cargo at the carriage are identified, Members Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992 discharge port to anyone else. should check: defines a lawful holder of a bill of A party to a sale contract, who is not (a) Whether the claim is being made lading, and states the following: the lawful holder of the bill of lading, against the contractual carrier; (a) a person with possession of the may have recourse against their (b) Whether the cargo interests have a bill who, by virtue of being the counterparty to the sale contract for right to sue under the contract person identified in the bill, is the any alleged losses, but will have no of carriage. consignee of the goods to which right to sue the carrier under the bill the bill relates; of lading. Who is the carrier? (b) a person with possession of the It is important to check the contract of bill as a result of the completion, carriage to see whether cargo interests by delivery of the bill, of any have claimed against the right party. indorsement of the bill or, in the The contractual carrier may not case of a bearer bill, of any other necessarily be the owner, because transfer of the bill; the bills of lading may name the (c) a person with possession of the charterers or another party as the bill as a result of any transaction carrier. This is a question of analysing by virtue of which he would have the wording in the bill of lading and become a holder falling within applying the rules of construction. paragraph (a) or (b) above had not Under English law the form of the bill the transaction been effected at a of lading is not necessarily conclusive. time when possession of the bill no Where the bill of lading is signed by longer gave a right (as against the the master, the carrier will usually carrier) to possession of the goods be held to be the registered owner. to which the bill relates; Where the vessel is demise chartered, Claims Guides Owners should demand the surrender In the case of negotiable bills of Potential liabilities of cargo by the cargo claimants of the original lading, the contractual rights of each claimants under bills of lading bill of lading for verification.
Recommended publications
  • Protecting Consignors' Interests and Rights to Recover Property

    Protecting Consignors' Interests and Rights to Recover Property

    A NEW YORK LAW JOURNAL SPECIAL SECTION Corporate Restructuring & Bankruptcy WWW. NYLJ.COM MONDAY, JUNE 22, 2015 Protecting Consignors’ Interests And Rights to Recover Property BY CARREN B. SHULMAN onsignment is an arrangement between two parties for one to sell the goods C of another. If the goods are sold, a dis- counted sales price is paid to the original seller with the balance to the buyer/con- signee. Many retail industries have used consignment for years, but many are mov- ing towards consignment. Other industries have used consignment and consignment-like relationships, such as “conditional sales.”1 In this uncertain economy, consignment is realizing a resurgence and may be an effec- tive cost saving measure for vendors/con- signees. This article addresses the law on consignment and how consignors protect themselves. Consignment is governed by Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). §9-109(a)(4). Consignment is defined in UCC §9-102 as: a transaction, regardless of its form, in which a person delivers goods to a mer- chant for the purpose of sale and: (A) the merchant (i) deals in goods of that kind under a name other than the name of the person making delivery; aggregate value of the goods is $1,000 ship rights. To the extent the consignment (ii) is not an auctioneer; and or more at the time of delivery; relationship fails sections (B) or (C) above, there may be a consignment relationship, (iii) is not generally known by its credi- (C) the goods are not consumer goods but it may not be governed by Article 9.
  • Frequently Overlooked Risk Management Issues in Contracts of Affreightment and Sale Contracts

    Frequently Overlooked Risk Management Issues in Contracts of Affreightment and Sale Contracts

    Frequently overlooked risk management issues in contracts of affreightment and sale contracts 2021 AMPLA Queensland Conference Chris Keane MinterEllison 18 June 2021 The focus of today’s presentation - risk associated with two contracts used to facilitate the export of Australian commodities: . the sale contract / offtake agreement / supply agreement (sale contract) . the contract of affreightment / voyage charterparty / bill of lading (sea carriage contract) Specific focus is on risk and risk mitigation options that are frequently overlooked (both at the time of contract formation and also when disputes arise) 2 Risk arising out of seemingly straightforward issues . Duration of the sale contract - overarching issue that impacts on many other considerations; legal and commercial considerations will overlap . Port(s) of loading and port(s) of discharge - relevant considerations include: access to certain berths; special arrangements regarding loading and unloading; port congestion and other factors likely to cause delay; and the desirability of not requiring a CIF buyer to nominate a specific port of unloading (e.g. “one safe port and one safe berth at any main port(s) in China…”) . Selection of vessel - risk will depend on which party to the sale contract is responsible for arranging the vessel; CIF sellers need to guard against the risk of selecting an unsuitable vessel; FOB sellers need to ensure they have a right to reject an unsuitable vessel nominated by the buyer 3 Risk arising out of seemingly straightforward issues . Selection of contractual carrier - needs to be considered as an issue separate from the selection of the vessel; what do you know (and not know) about the carrier?; note the difficulties the contractual carrier caused for both the seller and buyer in relation to the ‘Maryam’ at Port Kembla earlier this year; proper due diligence is critical; consider (among other things) compliance with anti-slavery, anti-bribery and sanctions laws and issues concerning care of seafarers, safety and environment .
  • Eufoafrica-Waybill-14.Pdf

    Eufoafrica-Waybill-14.Pdf

    NON NEGOTIABLE WAYBILL FOR COMBINED TRANSPORT SHIPMENT OR PORT TO PORT SHIPMENT EuroAfrica Shipping Lines Cyprus Limited 3105 Limassol, 229 Arch. Makariou III Avenue, Cyprus Waybill No. SHIPPER Correspondence address: 70-952 Szczecin, ul.Energetyków 3/4, Poland Shippers Ref. Tel. +48 91 81 43 255/256, fax +48 91 81 43 315, e-mail: [email protected], www.euroafrica.com.pl The contract evidenced by this Waybill is subject to the Carrier’s Tariff and Standard Bill of Lading terms and conditions, applicable to the voyage covered by this Waybill and operative on the date of issue, copies of which are available from the Carrier or his agents, incorporated in which is the following LAW AND JURISDICTION CLAUSE. Law and Jurisdiction CONSIGNEE (1) Unless Clause 25 or 27 applies, any claim against the Carrier under this Bill of Lading shall be determined according to English law in the High Court of Justice in London. (2) The Carrier shall be entitled to pursue any claim against the Merchant in London according to English Law or in any jurisdiction in which the Merchant has assets but then in accordance with the local law of that jurisdiction. (3) Nothing herein shall prevent the parties to any claim or dispute under the Bill of Lading from agreeing to submit the claim or dispute to arbitration by mutually acceptable arbitrator(s) on mutually acceptable terms at a mutually acceptable venue. (It is agreed that no responsibility shall attach to the Carrier or The contract evidenced by this Waybill, which is not a document of title to the goods, is deemed to be a his agent for failure to notify the Consignee of the arrival of the contract of carriage as defined in Article 1 (b) of the Hague Rules and Hague Visby Rules, and every NOTIFY PARTY AND ADDRESS goods [see clause 20 of the Bill of Lading.]) reference in the carrier’s Bill of Lading terms & conditions and tariff to the words “Bill of Lading” shall be read and construed as a reference to the words “Non Negotiable Waybill’.
  • LINEWAYBILL 2016 NON-NEGOTIABLE LINER SEA WAYBILL Page 2 I

    LINEWAYBILL 2016 NON-NEGOTIABLE LINER SEA WAYBILL Page 2 I

    Shipper Liner Sea Waybill No. Reference No. Consignee (not to order) Notify address Vessel Pre-carriage by Port of loading Place of receipt by pre-carrier Port of discharge Place of delivery by on-carrier Container No./Seal No./Marks and Number and kind of packages, Gross weight, kg Measurement, m3 Nos. description of goods PARTICULARS DECLARED BY THE SHIPPER BUT NOT ACKNOWLEDGED BY THE CARRIER Total number of Containers/Packages or RECEIVED for carriage in apparent good order and condition (unless otherwise stated herein) the total number of Units received by the Carrier SampleContainers/Packages or Units indicated copy in the Box opposite entitled "Total No. of Containers/Packages or Units received by the Carrier" and the goods as specified above, weight, measure, marks, numbers, quality, quantity, contents and value unknown for delivery at the place indicated above. Freight and charges The goods shipped under this Sea Waybill will be delivered to the Party named as Consignee or its authorised agent, on production of proof of identity without any documentary formalities. Should the Shipper require delivery of the goods to a party other than the Consignee stated in this Sea Waybill, then written instructions must be given to the Carrier or his agent. The Shipper shall, however, be entitled to transfer right of control of the goods to the Consignee, Freight payable at the exercise of such option to be noted on this Sea Waybill and to be made no later than the receipt of the goods by the Carrier. The Carrier shall exercise due care ensuring that delivery is made to the proper party.
  • Instructions for Completing Form BIS-711, Statement of Ultimate Consignee and Purchaser

    Instructions for Completing Form BIS-711, Statement of Ultimate Consignee and Purchaser

    Instructions for completing Form BIS-711, Statement of Ultimate Consignee and Purchaser All information must be typed or legibly printed in each appropriate Block or Box. Block 1: Ultimate Consignee. The Ultimate Consignee must be the person abroad who is actually to receive the material for the disposition stated in Block 2. Therefore, a bank, freight forwarder, forwarding agent, or other intermediary is not acceptable as the Ultimate Consignee (For a definition of intermediate consignee, please see page 2 of this document.) If the ultimate consignee is an individual, please state the name as listed on a government-issued ID. If the ultimate consignee is a company, please state the company name and address as listed on the business license/business certificate. * Please note: The information given in Block 1 must match the name and address listed on your Bill of Lading/Air Waybill issued by a freight forwarder. Block 2: Disposition or Use of Items by Ultimate Consignee named in Block 1. Place an (X) in “A.,” “B.,” “C.,” “D.,” and “E.,” as appropriate, and fill in the required information. * Please note: Certain armored vehicles are considered a controlled item under Department of Commerce export regulations (ECCN 0A606), and cannot be resold, transferred or re-exported without prior authorization from the US Department of Commerce. Block 3: Nature of Business of Ultimate Consignee named in Block 1. Complete both “A” and “B”. Possible choices for “A” include: broker, distributor, fabricator, manufacturer, wholesaler, retailer, value added reseller, original equipment manufacturer, etc. Possible choices for “B” include: contractual, franchise, distributor, wholesaler, continuing and regular individual business, etc.
  • WAYBILL Clause (2018.04.01) ”K” LINE LOGISTICS, LTD

    WAYBILL Clause (2018.04.01) ”K” LINE LOGISTICS, LTD

    WAYBILL Clause (2018.04.01) ”K” LINE LOGISTICS, LTD. <Face Clause> RECEIVED by the Carrier from the Shipper in apparent good order and condition unless otherwise indicated herein, the Goods or the Container(s) or package(s) said to contain the Goods herein mentioned, to be carried subject to all the terms and conditions provided for on the face and back of this Waybill, from the place of receipt or port of loading to the Port of Discharge or Place of Delivery shown herein and there to be delivered. Particulars furnished by the Merchant. All descriptions contained herein considered unknown to the Carrier. None of the terms of this Waybill can be waived by or for the Carrier except by express waiver signed by the Carrier or its duly authorized agent. IN ACCEPTING THIS WAYBILL, the Merchant agrees to be bound by all the stipulations, exceptions, terms and conditions on the face and back hereof, and the terms and conditions contained in the Carrier's applicable Tariff, whether written, typed, stamped, printed or otherwise incorporated, as fully as if signed by the Merchant, any local custom or privilege to the contrary notwithstanding, and agrees that all representations, agreements or freight engagements for and in connection with the Carriage of the Goods are superseded by this Waybill. Moreover, the Shipper accepts the said stipulations, exceptions, terms and conditions not only on his own behalf but on behalf of the Consignee and the Owner of the Goods and the Shipper warrants that he has the authority to do so. Except as otherwise specifically provided in this Waybill, delivery of the Goods will be made only to the Consignee named on the face hereof, or his authorized agent, on production of proof of identity at the Port of Discharge or the Place of Delivery.
  • Bills of Lading Vs Sea Waybills, and the Himalaya Clause Peter G

    Bills of Lading Vs Sea Waybills, and the Himalaya Clause Peter G

    Bills of Lading vs Sea Waybills, and The Himalaya Clause Peter G. Pamel and Robert C. Wilkins Borden Ladner Gervais, LLP Presented at the NJI/CMLA, Federal Court and Federal Court of Appeal Canadian Maritime Law Association Seminar April 15, 2011 Fairmont Château Laurier, Ottawa 1) Introduction Bills of lading and sea waybills are two of the most common forms of transport document used in contemporary shipping. Their similarities and difference, and respective uses, in such trade should be clearly understood by all who are involved in that activity. In particular the meaning of “document of title” used in respect of bills of lading, and whether sea waybills are or are not also such documents of title, have given rise to much debate, which has now largely been resolved in major shipping nations. Also, the impact on these transport documents of compulsorily applicable liability regimes set out in international carriage of goods by sea conventions is also essential to a proper grasp of the role these documents play in international maritime commerce. It is also interesting to examine how parties other than carriers, shippers and consignees can and do benefit from certain clauses in ocean bills of lading and sea waybills which purport to confer on such third parties or classes of them the exemptions from, and limitations of, liability which marine carriers assume in the performance of their functions. This paper will attempt to provide an overview of these issues, with special reference to how they are addressed in Canadian maritime law. 2) Bills of Lading and Sea Waybills in Modern Shipping Bills of lading and sea waybills are the two basic documents that attest to the carriage of goods by water, both domestically within Canada and internationally.
  • IATA Cargo Service Conference Resolutions

    IATA Cargo Service Conference Resolutions

    IATA Cargo Service Conference Resolutions Table of Contents RESOLUTION 600(*) - The Consignment ............................................................................................. 2 RESOLUTION 600a (*) - Air Waybill ..................................................................................................... 4 RESOLUTION 600b(*) - Air Waybill—Conditions of Contract ........................................................... 36 RESOLUTION 606(*) - Bar Coded Label ........................................................................................... 39 RESOLUTION 606a(*) - Non-Bar Coded Label ................................................................................. 51 RESOLUTION 607(*) - Standards for Labels and Tags for Special Shipments .................................. 56 RESOLUTION 612(*) - Shipper's Request for Changes to Air Waybill and Shipment Record Amounts .......................................................................................................................................... 60 RESOLUTION 614(*) - Procedures for Disbursements .................................................................... 61 RESOLUTION 618(*) - IATA Dangerous Goods Regulations .............................................................. 61 RESOLUTION 620(*) - IATA Live Animals Regulations ..................................................................... 62 RESOLUTION 622 - IATA Perishable Cargo Regulations .................................................................. 63 RESOLUTION 651 - Consignment
  • Download the Shipping Network June 2014

    Download the Shipping Network June 2014

    Legal Eagles Do you have a burning legal question for the HFW Shipping Legal Network team? Email [email protected] for them to answer your question in the next issue of the Shipping Network . Questions should be of a general nature and not specific to a Eagles... particular live issue. Holman Fenwick Willan’s crack team of specialist shipping lawyers answer your legal questions Under a combined transport bill of lading, “Freight: shall be the freight and all charges, costs, duties where the shipping line is responsible for and expenses whatsoever, payable to the carrier, or incurred by Q delivery to the named destination, should the carrier in carriage of the goods in accordance with the the shipper or any party named as consignee applicable tariff and this bill of lading, including storage, per diem or notify party be responsible for any charges and demurrage.” Guy Main if the container is delivered within the A freight definition of this type arguably includes any charges demurrage-free period shown in the bill of incurred by the carrier as a result of the contract of carriage. There lading, but where the UK port of discharge only allows the may be an argument that ‘expected’ charges are not included shipping line a shorter period free for quay rent? as they should have been provided for in the original quotation, but charges that arise out of a delay to the carriage or otherwise Ascertaining the rights of various parties arise from an event outside of the normal carriage of goods will under a bill of lading is a question of almost certainly be included.
  • PERFORMANCE and CANCELLATION of CHARTERPARTIES SUSPENSION / WITHDRAWAL / TERMINATION Notices, Damages and Potential Pitfalls

    PERFORMANCE and CANCELLATION of CHARTERPARTIES SUSPENSION / WITHDRAWAL / TERMINATION Notices, Damages and Potential Pitfalls

    PERFORMANCE AND CANCELLATION OF CHARTERPARTIES SUSPENSION / WITHDRAWAL / TERMINATION Notices, damages and potential pitfalls A. INTRODUCTION The minds of owners and charterers alike are presently focused (as they should) on the Covid19 outbreak and how they can either utilise existing clauses or put together new clauses dealing with Covid19 in an attempt to refuse to perform or get out of a charter or prevent their contractual counterparty from doing so. Penningtons Manches Cooper has already issued a number of articles and circulars (as well as a contractual tool kit) in respect of the effect of Covid19, the business interruption aspects of it as well as the way forward. But what happens in circumstances where an existing contract is no longer desirable (or indeed financially viable) and one of the contractual counterparties wishes to no longer be bound it, either because of, for example, the state of the market or because the other party are not performing their end of the deal, whether as a result of Covid19 or otherwise? A number of other considerations will of course be relevant (amongst others, the parties’ commercial relationships, the state of the market, the ability to enforce against the non-performing party) but the purpose of this article is to act as a reminder of the various options available to an owner and charterer in the context of refusing to perform or getting out of a charterparty. The above will be considered against a background of seeking to resolve disputes before they even arise, with a view to limiting (to the extent feasible) the costs and delays incurred where the parties engage in arbitration/ litigation proceedings.
  • Best Practice Guide on Abandoned Goods Introduction

    Best Practice Guide on Abandoned Goods Introduction

    BEST PRACTICE GUIDE ON ABANDONED GOODS International Federation of Freight Forwarders Associations The global voice of freight logistics FIATA INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF FREIGHT FORWARDERS ASSOCIATIONS FIATA is a nongovernmental, membership-based organization representing freight forwarders in some 150 countries. FIATA is a reference source on international policies and regulations governing the freight forwarding and logistics industry. FIATA works at the international level to represent service providers who operate in trade logistics and supply chain management. Through its FIATA documents and forms, congress, training and publications, it promotes trade facilitation and best practices among the freight forwarding community. Founded in Vienna, Austria, on 1926, FIATA owes its name to its French acronym (Fédération Internationale des Associations de Transitaires et Assimilés) and is known as ‘the global voice of freight logistics’. FIATA is headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland. DISCLAIMER This document is NOT to be construed as providing any legal advice. FIATA recommends that readers seek independent legal advice if they have any questions on dealing with their specific circumstances. It should be noted that this best practice guide provides general considerations that are of relevance on a global, risk-manage- ment basis, and does not include technical advice. It is recommended that the reader adjust and implement the recommended measures in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations in their jurisdiction, its corporate structure, business model and risk control requirements in the country or geographic areas where it is operating. FIATA accepts no responsibility for the consequences of the use of the information contained in this document.. For further information about the activities of the FIATA Advisory Body on Legal Matters or to make comments about this guide, please contact FIATA at [email protected].
  • Marine Charter Default Insurance

    Marine Charter Default Insurance

    Marine Practice CHARTER DEFAULT INSURANCE In response to shipowners’ increasing concerns about charterers’ solvency, Marsh has developed an industry-first product that protects owners from damaging financial losses. Backed by both insurers and a leading financial institution, Marsh’s Charter Default product provides a mix of fixed recovery guarantee and credit insurance, tailored to the shipowner’s particular requirements. Covering both outstanding debt at the time of an insolvency and the loss of future revenue for a set period, the product de-risks important revenue streams, thereby assisting owners to attract better terms fr om lenders by reducing counterparty credit risk. i • Charter Default Insurance PRODUCT OVERVIEW PROTECTING REVENUE AGAINST THE RISK OF FINANCIAL DEFAULT f Financial default is a recurring problem. Recent high profile cases of shipping companies filing for bankruptcy have again highlighted counterparty risk in the shipping sector f Companies with ships on charter are exposed to loss of revenue if their charterer folds or, at best, to enforced renegotiation of charter hire terms f The risk of default increases at times of global financial uncertainty f Fixed Recovery Guarantees and Credit Insurance protect against the risk of charterer default f For a listed company, de-risking the revenue stream can improve stock prospects f De-risking the revenue stream can also attract better terms from lenders Marsh • 1 CREDIT INSURANCE FIXED RECOVERY GUARANTEE Key FeaTuRes • an insurance policy designed to compensate an owner