DOCSLIB.ORG

Density Functional Calculation of X-Ray Absorption Spectra Within the Core Hole Approximation: an Implementation in Nwchem

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 8-2010 Density Functional Calculation of X-Ray Absorption Spectra within the Core Hole Approximation: An Implementation in NWChem William Ben Carlen [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the Physical Chemistry Commons Recommended Citation Carlen, William Ben, "Density Functional Calculation of X-Ray Absorption Spectra within the Core Hole Approximation: An Implementation in NWChem. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2010. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/767 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by William Ben Carlen entitled "Density Functional Calculation of X-Ray Absorption Spectra within the Core Hole Approximation: An Implementation in NWChem." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Chemistry. Robert J. Harrison, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Craig E. Barnes, Thomas J. Papenbrock, Charles Feigerle, Robert J. Hinde Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by William Benton Carlen entitled “Den- sity Functional Calculation of X-ray Absorption Spectra within the Core Hole Approxima- tion: An Implementation in NWChem.” I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Chemistry. Robert J. Harrison Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Robert J. Hinde Craig E. Barnes Charles Feigerle Thomas F. Papenbrock Accepted for the Council: Carolyn Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official student records.) Density Functional Calculation of X-Ray Absorption Spectra within the Core Hole Approximation: An Implementation in NWChem A Dissertation Presented for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville William Benton Carlen August 2010 Acknowledgments I would like to express my deep gratitude to Dr. Robert J. Harrison for the support, guidance, and encouragement given to me througout my academic career. I would also like to thank Drs. Charles Fiegerle, Robert Hinde, Craig Barnes, and Thomas Papenbrock for supporting my doctoral candidacy by serving on my committee. Most importantly, I would like to express my love and appreciation for my family for believing in me and supporting me throughout my career. This work was supported by the Center for Information Technology Research and the Science Alliance Computational Sciences Initiative at the University of Tennessee and by the National Institutes of Health under Grant No. HD52472-01. ii Abstract Density functional theory is used to calculate the core excitation spectra of titanium structures. Specifically, the core-hole approximation is used. In this scenario, the excitation energies of core electrons are calculated using the approximation that the core energy level be frozen throughout the relaxation process of the orbitals. This allows a more acurate determination of the resulting X-ray spectra. The method described has been implemented in an NWChem module. iii Contents 1 Methods in Quantum Chemistry 1 1.1 The Hamiltonian and the Schr¨odingerEquation ................ 1 1.1.1 Variational Theorem ........................... 2 1.2 LCAO ....................................... 3 1.2.1 Basis Sets ................................. 3 1.3 Hartree-Fock Theory ............................... 7 1.3.1 The Slater Determinant ......................... 7 1.3.2 The Hartree-Fock Energy ........................ 7 1.3.3 The Hartree-Fock Equations ...................... 8 1.3.4 Koopmans’ Theorem ........................... 9 1.3.5 Correlation Energy ............................ 9 1.4 Coupled-Cluster Theory ............................. 10 1.4.1 The Exponential Ansatz ......................... 11 1.4.2 Size-Consistency ............................. 11 1.4.3 Size-Extensivity ............................. 12 1.4.4 The Coupled-Cluster Energy Equation ................. 13 1.4.5 Computational Cost ........................... 14 1.4.6 Excited States in CC Theory ...................... 15 1.5 Perturbation Theory ............................... 16 1.6 DFT ........................................ 18 1.6.1 The First Hohenberg-Kohn Theorem .................. 18 1.6.2 N-Representability ............................ 20 iv 1.6.3 The Second Hohenberg-Kohn Theorem ................. 20 1.6.4 The Energy Functional ......................... 21 1.6.5 The Kohn-Sham Equations ....................... 22 1.6.6 Janak’s Theorem ............................. 23 2 X-ray Spectroscopy 25 2.1 X-Ray Spectroscopies .............................. 26 2.2 Discussion of the Theory of XAS ........................ 26 2.3 Multiple Scattering Theory ........................... 29 2.3.1 Derivation of MS Equations ....................... 29 2.3.2 Muffin-Tin Potential ........................... 33 2.3.3 Scattering Path Operators ........................ 34 2.3.4 The Multiple-Scattering Function χL,L0 ................ 35 2.4 State of the Art in XAS Software ........................ 35 2.5 Physical Process of X-ray Absorption ...................... 36 3 Theoretical Treatment of the Core Hole State 38 3.1 Goals and Methods ................................ 38 3.2 The Core Hole State ............................... 40 3.2.1 Limiting Cases of Ionization and Excitation .............. 41 3.3 Core Level Constraint .............................. 41 3.4 The Cross-Section for Absorption ........................ 42 3.4.1 Dipole Approximation .......................... 43 3.4.2 The Excitation Energy .......................... 43 3.4.3 Transition Moments ........................... 45 3.5 Approximations .................................. 47 3.5.1 Systematic Improvement Toward Exact Result ............ 48 4 Methods used in NWChem 49 4.1 The XAS Directive in NWChem ........................ 49 4.2 Enforcing Core-Hole Orthogonality ....................... 51 4.3 Calculating the Cross-Section .......................... 52 v 4.3.1 Subroutine print info ........................... 53 4.3.2 Subroutine Intensity ........................... 55 4.4 Broadening of the Spectra ............................ 58 4.4.1 Lifetime of the Excited State ...................... 59 4.4.2 Thermal Effects .............................. 61 4.5 Identification of Spectral Peaks ......................... 64 4.5.1 Components of MO Vectors ....................... 64 4.5.2 Mulliken Population Analysis ...................... 64 4.6 Parallelization ................................... 66 4.7 Convergence .................................... 67 4.7.1 Damping ................................. 67 4.7.2 Levelshifting ............................... 67 5 Applications and Results 69 5.1 Chemical Motivation ............................... 69 5.2 XAS Studies on Ti Containing Systems .................... 71 5.2.1 Experimental Studies .......................... 71 5.2.2 Theoretical Studies ............................ 72 5.3 Theory and Experiment Working Together ................... 73 5.3.1 Effects of Chlorine on Spectral Features ................ 73 5.3.2 Goals of Research ............................ 73 5.4 Model Systems .................................. 74 5.5 Identification of the Absorption Edge ...................... 74 5.6 Changes Upon Inclusion of Thermal Effects using MD ............ 82 5.7 Convergence with System Size .......................... 83 5.8 Comparison of Excitation and Ionization .................... 84 5.8.1 Energy Gap Comparison for Ionization/Excitation .......... 84 5.8.2 Intensity of Pre-Edge Features ..................... 86 5.8.3 Intensity of In-Edge Feature ....................... 88 5.8.4 Pre-Edge Shift .............................. 89 5.9 Comparison of LDA and B3LYP Functionals ................. 89 vi 5.9.1 Energy Gap Comparison for LDA/B3LYP ............... 93 6 Identification of Spectral Features 94 6.1 Orbital Analysis ................................. 94 6.1.1 Single-Shelled Systems .......................... 94 6.1.2 Two-Shelled Systems ........................... 94 6.2 Mulliken Population Analysis .......................... 99 6.2.1 Single-Shelled Systems .......................... 99 6.2.2 Two-Shelled Systems ........................... 99 6.3 Conclusions .................................... 102 6.3.1 Nature of States in the Absoprtion Edge ................ 102 6.3.2 Chlorine Dependence of Edge Feature ................. 102 6.3.3 Mulliken Population Analysis ...................... 103 6.3.4 Ionization vs. Excitation ......................... 103 6.3.5 Thermal Averaging ............................ 103 6.3.6 LDA vs. B3LYP ............................
Recommended publications
  • On the Calculation of Molecular Properties of Heavy Element Systems with Ab Initio Approaches: from Gas-Phase to Complex Systems André Severo Pereira Gomes

    On the Calculation of Molecular Properties of Heavy Element Systems with Ab Initio Approaches: from Gas-Phase to Complex Systems André Severo Pereira Gomes

    On the calculation of molecular properties of heavy element systems with ab initio approaches: from gas-phase to complex systems André Severo Pereira Gomes To cite this version: André Severo Pereira Gomes. On the calculation of molecular properties of heavy element systems with ab initio approaches: from gas-phase to complex systems. Theoretical and/or physical chemistry. Universite de Lille, 2016. tel-01960393 HAL Id: tel-01960393 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01960393 Submitted on 19 Dec 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. M´emoirepr´esent´epour obtenir le dipl^omed' Habilitation `adiriger des recherches { Sciences Physiques de l'Universit´ede Lille (Sciences et Technologies) ANDRE´ SEVERO PEREIRA GOMES Universit´ede Lille - CNRS Laboratoire PhLAM UMR 8523 On the calculation of molecular properties of heavy element systems with ab initio approaches: from gas-phase to complex systems M´emoirepr´esent´epour obtenir le dipl^omed' Habilitation `adiriger des recherches { Sciences Physiques de l'Universit´ede Lille (Sciences et
  • Dr. David Danovich

    Dr. David Danovich

    Dr. David Danovich ! 14 January 2021 (h-index: 34; 124 publications) Personal Information Name: Contact information Danovich David Private: Nissan Harpaz st., 4/9, Jerusalem, Date of Birth: 9371643 Israel June 29, 1959 Mobile: +972-54-4768669 E-mail: [email protected] Place of Birth: Irkutsk, USSR Work: Institute of Chemistry, The Hebrew Citizenship: University, Edmond Safra Campus, Israeli Givat Ram, 9190401 Jerusalem, Israel Marital status: Phone: +972-2-6586934 Married +2 FAX: +972-2-6584033 E-mail: [email protected] Current position 1992- present: Senior computational chemist and scientific programmer in the Institute of Chemistry, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel Scientific skills Very experienced scientific researcher with demonstrated ability to implement ab initio molecular electronic structure and valence bond calculations for obtaining insights into physical and chemical properties of molecules and materials. Extensive expertise in implementation of Molecular Orbital Theory based on ab initio methods such as Hartree-Fock theory (HF), Density Functional Theory (DFT), Moller-Plesset Perturbation theory (MP2-MP5), Couple Cluster theories [CCST(T)], Complete Active Space (CAS, CASPT2) theories, Multireference Configuration Interaction (MRCI) theory and modern ab initio valence bond theory (VBT) methods such as Valence Bond Self Consistent Field theory (VBSCF), Breathing Orbital Valence Bond theory (BOVB) and its variants (like D-BOVB, S-BOVB and SD-BOVB), Valence Bond Configuration Interaction theory (VBCI), Valence Bond Perturbation theory (VBPT). Language skills Advanced Conversational English, Russian Hebrew Academic background 1. Undergraduate studies, 1978-1982 Master of Science in Physics, June 1982 Irkutsk State University, USSR Dr. David Danovich ! 2. Graduate studies, 1984-1989 Ph.
  • Modern Quantum Chemistry with [Open]Molcas

    Modern Quantum Chemistry with [Open]Molcas

    Modern quantum chemistry with [Open]Molcas Cite as: J. Chem. Phys. 152, 214117 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0004835 Submitted: 17 February 2020 . Accepted: 11 May 2020 . Published Online: 05 June 2020 Francesco Aquilante , Jochen Autschbach , Alberto Baiardi , Stefano Battaglia , Veniamin A. Borin , Liviu F. Chibotaru , Irene Conti , Luca De Vico , Mickaël Delcey , Ignacio Fdez. Galván , Nicolas Ferré , Leon Freitag , Marco Garavelli , Xuejun Gong , Stefan Knecht , Ernst D. Larsson , Roland Lindh , Marcus Lundberg , Per Åke Malmqvist , Artur Nenov , Jesper Norell , Michael Odelius , Massimo Olivucci , Thomas B. Pedersen , Laura Pedraza-González , Quan M. Phung , Kristine Pierloot , Markus Reiher , Igor Schapiro , Javier Segarra-Martí , Francesco Segatta , Luis Seijo , Saumik Sen , Dumitru-Claudiu Sergentu , Christopher J. Stein , Liviu Ungur , Morgane Vacher , Alessio Valentini , and Valera Veryazov J. Chem. Phys. 152, 214117 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0004835 152, 214117 © 2020 Author(s). The Journal ARTICLE of Chemical Physics scitation.org/journal/jcp Modern quantum chemistry with [Open]Molcas Cite as: J. Chem. Phys. 152, 214117 (2020); doi: 10.1063/5.0004835 Submitted: 17 February 2020 • Accepted: 11 May 2020 • Published Online: 5 June 2020 Francesco Aquilante,1,a) Jochen Autschbach,2,b) Alberto Baiardi,3,c) Stefano Battaglia,4,d) Veniamin A. Borin,5,e) Liviu F. Chibotaru,6,f) Irene Conti,7,g) Luca De Vico,8,h) Mickaël Delcey,9,i) Ignacio Fdez. Galván,4,j) Nicolas Ferré,10,k) Leon Freitag,3,l) Marco Garavelli,7,m) Xuejun Gong,11,n) Stefan Knecht,3,o) Ernst D. Larsson,12,p) Roland Lindh,4,q) Marcus Lundberg,9,r) Per Åke Malmqvist,12,s) Artur Nenov,7,t) Jesper Norell,13,u) Michael Odelius,13,v) Massimo Olivucci,8,14,w) Thomas B.
  • Charge-Transfer Biexciton Annihilation in a Donor-Acceptor

    Charge-Transfer Biexciton Annihilation in a Donor-Acceptor

    Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Chemical Science. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020 Supporting Information for Charge-Transfer Biexciton Annihilation in a Donor-Acceptor Co-crystal yields High-Energy Long-Lived Charge Carriers Itai Schlesinger, Natalia E. Powers-Riggs, Jenna L. Logsdon, Yue Qi, Stephen A. Miller, Roel Tempelaar, Ryan M. Young, and Michael R. Wasielewski* Department of Chemistry and Institute for Sustainability and Energy at Northwestern, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, Illinois 60208-3113 Contents 1. Single crystal X-ray structure data. ..................................................................................................2 2. Crystal structure determination and refinement.............................................................................3 3. Additional Steady-state absorption Spectra.....................................................................................4 4. Pump and probe spot sizes.................................................................................................................5 5. Excitation density and fraction of molecules excited calculations ..................................................6 6. Calculation of the fraction of CT excitons adjacent to one another ...............................................7 7. Calculation of reorganization energies and charge transfer rates..................................................9 8. Model Hamiltonian for calculating polarization-dependent steady-state absorption
  • FORCE FIELDS and CRYSTAL STRUCTURE PREDICTION Contents

    FORCE FIELDS and CRYSTAL STRUCTURE PREDICTION Contents

    FORCE FIELDS AND CRYSTAL STRUCTURE PREDICTION Bouke P. van Eijck ([email protected]) Utrecht University (Retired) Department of Crystal and Structural Chemistry Padualaan 8, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands Originally written in 2003 Update blind tests 2017 Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Lattice Energy 2 2.1 Polarcrystals .............................. 4 2.2 ConvergenceAcceleration . 5 2.3 EnergyMinimization .......................... 6 3 Temperature effects 8 3.1 LatticeVibrations............................ 8 4 Prediction of Crystal Structures 9 4.1 Stage1:generationofpossiblestructures . .... 9 4.2 Stage2:selectionoftherightstructure(s) . ..... 11 4.3 Blindtests................................ 14 4.4 Beyondempiricalforcefields. 15 4.5 Conclusions............................... 17 4.6 Update2017............................... 17 1 1 Introduction Everybody who looks at a crystal structure marvels how Nature finds a way to pack complex molecules into space-filling patterns. The question arises: can we understand such packings without doing experiments? This is a great challenge to theoretical chemistry. Most work in this direction uses the concept of a force field. This is just the po- tential energy of a collection of atoms as a function of their coordinates. In principle, this energy can be calculated by quantumchemical methods for a free molecule; even for an entire crystal computations are beginning to be feasible. But for nearly all work a parameterized functional form for the energy is necessary. An ab initio force field is derived from the abovementioned calculations on small model systems, which can hopefully be generalized to other related substances. This is a relatively new devel- opment, and most force fields are empirical: they have been developed to reproduce observed properties as well as possible. There exists a number of more or less time- honored force fields: MM3, CHARMM, AMBER, GROMOS, OPLS, DREIDING..
  • Jaguar 5.5 User Manual Copyright © 2003 Schrödinger, L.L.C

    Jaguar 5.5 User Manual Copyright © 2003 Schrödinger, L.L.C

    Jaguar 5.5 User Manual Copyright © 2003 Schrödinger, L.L.C. All rights reserved. Schrödinger, FirstDiscovery, Glide, Impact, Jaguar, Liaison, LigPrep, Maestro, Prime, QSite, and QikProp are trademarks of Schrödinger, L.L.C. MacroModel is a registered trademark of Schrödinger, L.L.C. To the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, this publication is provided “as is” without warranty of any kind. This publication may contain trademarks of other companies. October 2003 Contents Chapter 1: Introduction.......................................................................................1 1.1 Conventions Used in This Manual.......................................................................2 1.2 Citing Jaguar in Publications ...............................................................................3 Chapter 2: The Maestro Graphical User Interface...........................................5 2.1 Starting Maestro...................................................................................................5 2.2 The Maestro Main Window .................................................................................7 2.3 Maestro Projects ..................................................................................................7 2.4 Building a Structure.............................................................................................9 2.5 Atom Selection ..................................................................................................10 2.6 Toolbar Controls ................................................................................................11
  • Generating Gaussian Basis Sets for CRYSTAL and Qwalk Lucas K

    Generating Gaussian Basis Sets for CRYSTAL and Qwalk Lucas K

    Generating Gaussian basis sets for CRYSTAL and QWalk Lucas K. Wagner The point of a basis set is to describe a (generally unknown) function efficiently. That is, we are going to approximate some general function f(x) by a sum over known basis functions (in this case χ(x)): X f(x) = ciχi(x): (1) i We will usually choose χi(x) such that they are convenient to work with. Perhaps integrals are easy to do with them, or perhaps they very closely approximate the function f(x), so that we don’t need too many elements in the sum of Eqn1. One basis set expansion that you may be familiar with is the Fourier expansion, which uses plane waves as the χi’s. In many-body quantum systems, we typically start our description of the many-body wave function Ψ(r1; r2;:::) with a Slater determinant. This is written as follows: 0 1 φ1(r1) φ1(r2) φ1(r3) ::: B φ2(r1) φ2(r2) φ2(r3) ::: C ΨS(r1; r2;:::) = Det B C (2) @ φ3(r1) φ3(r2) φ3(r3) ::: A :::::::::::: where ri is the position of the ith electron and φi(r) is called a molecular or crystalline orbital (MO/CO). The Slater determinant is the simplest possible many-electron wave function that satisfies fermion antisymmetry [Ψ(r1; r2;:::) = Ψ(r2; r1;:::)]. There also − exist algorithms to evaluate properties of the Slater determinant efficiently. Note that these one-particle functions φi have not yet been specified, and we will have to come up with a way to represent them within the computer.
  • Trends in Atomistic Simulation Software Usage [1.3]

    Trends in Atomistic Simulation Software Usage [1.3]

    A LiveCoMS Perpetual Review Trends in atomistic simulation software usage [1.3] Leopold Talirz1,2,3*, Luca M. Ghiringhelli4, Berend Smit1,3 1Laboratory of Molecular Simulation (LSMO), Institut des Sciences et Ingenierie Chimiques, Valais, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, CH-1951 Sion, Switzerland; 2Theory and Simulation of Materials (THEOS), Faculté des Sciences et Techniques de l’Ingénieur, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland; 3National Centre for Computational Design and Discovery of Novel Materials (MARVEL), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland; 4The NOMAD Laboratory at the Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Society and Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany This LiveCoMS document is Abstract Driven by the unprecedented computational power available to scientific research, the maintained online on GitHub at https: use of computers in solid-state physics, chemistry and materials science has been on a continuous //github.com/ltalirz/ rise. This review focuses on the software used for the simulation of matter at the atomic scale. We livecoms-atomistic-software; provide a comprehensive overview of major codes in the field, and analyze how citations to these to provide feedback, suggestions, or help codes in the academic literature have evolved since 2010. An interactive version of the underlying improve it, please visit the data set is available at https://atomistic.software. GitHub repository and participate via the issue tracker. This version dated August *For correspondence: 30, 2021 [email protected] (LT) 1 Introduction Gaussian [2], were already released in the 1970s, followed Scientists today have unprecedented access to computa- by force-field codes, such as GROMOS [3], and periodic tional power.
  • The Molpro Quantum Chemistry Package

    The Molpro Quantum Chemistry Package

    The Molpro Quantum Chemistry package Hans-Joachim Werner,1, a) Peter J. Knowles,2, b) Frederick R. Manby,3, c) Joshua A. Black,1, d) Klaus Doll,1, e) Andreas Heßelmann,1, f) Daniel Kats,4, g) Andreas K¨ohn,1, h) Tatiana Korona,5, i) David A. Kreplin,1, j) Qianli Ma,1, k) Thomas F. Miller, III,6, l) Alexander Mitrushchenkov,7, m) Kirk A. Peterson,8, n) Iakov Polyak,2, o) 1, p) 2, q) Guntram Rauhut, and Marat Sibaev 1)Institut f¨ur Theoretische Chemie, Universit¨at Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 55, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany 2)School of Chemistry, Cardiff University, Main Building, Park Place, Cardiff CF10 3AT, United Kingdom 3)School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Cantock’s Close, Bristol BS8 1TS, United Kingdom 4)Max-Planck Institute for Solid State Research, Heisenbergstraße 1, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany 5)Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw, L. Pasteura 1 St., 02-093 Warsaw, Poland 6)Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, United States 7)MSME, Univ Gustave Eiffel, UPEC, CNRS, F-77454, Marne-la- Vall´ee, France 8)Washington State University, Department of Chemistry, Pullman, WA 99164-4630 1 Molpro is a general purpose quantum chemistry software package with a long devel- opment history. It was originally focused on accurate wavefunction calculations for small molecules, but now has many additional distinctive capabilities that include, inter alia, local correlation approximations combined with explicit correlation, highly efficient implementations of single-reference correlation methods, robust and efficient multireference methods for large molecules, projection embedding and anharmonic vibrational spectra.
  • Density Functional Theory for Transition Metals and Transition Metal Chemistry

    Density Functional Theory for Transition Metals and Transition Metal Chemistry

    REVIEW ARTICLE www.rsc.org/pccp | Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics Density functional theory for transition metals and transition metal chemistry Christopher J. Cramer* and Donald G. Truhlar* Received 8th April 2009, Accepted 20th August 2009 First published as an Advance Article on the web 21st October 2009 DOI: 10.1039/b907148b We introduce density functional theory and review recent progress in its application to transition metal chemistry. Topics covered include local, meta, hybrid, hybrid meta, and range-separated functionals, band theory, software, validation tests, and applications to spin states, magnetic exchange coupling, spectra, structure, reactivity, and catalysis, including molecules, clusters, nanoparticles, surfaces, and solids. 1. Introduction chemical systems, in part because its cost scales more favorably with system size than does the cost of correlated WFT, and yet Density functional theory (DFT) describes the electronic states it competes well in accuracy except for very small systems. This of atoms, molecules, and materials in terms of the three- is true even in organic chemistry, but the advantages of DFT dimensional electronic density of the system, which is a great are still greater for metals, especially transition metals. The simplification over wave function theory (WFT), which involves reason for this added advantage is static electron correlation. a3N-dimensional antisymmetric wave function for a system It is now well appreciated that quantitatively accurate 1 with N electrons. Although DFT is sometimes considered the electronic structure calculations must include electron correlation. B ‘‘new kid on the block’’, it is now 45 years old in its modern It is convenient to recognize two types of electron correlation, 2 formulation (more than half as old as quantum mechanics the first called dynamical electron correlation and the second 3,4 itself), and it has roots that are almost as ancient as the called static correlation, near-degeneracy correlation, or non- Schro¨ dinger equation.
  • Chem3d 17.0 User Guide Chem3d 17.0

    Chem3d 17.0 User Guide Chem3d 17.0

    Chem3D 17.0 User Guide Chem3D 17.0 Table of Contents Recent Additions viii Chapter 1: About Chem3D 1 Additional computational engines 1 Serial numbers and technical support 3 About Chem3D Tutorials 3 Chapter 2: Chem3D Basics 5 Getting around 5 User interface preferences 9 Background settings 10 Sample files 10 Saving to Dropbox 10 Chapter 3: Basic Model Building 12 Default settings 12 Selecting a display mode 12 Using bond tools 13 Using the ChemDraw panel 15 Using other 2D drawing packages 15 Building from text 16 Adding fragments 18 Selecting atoms and bonds 18 Atom charges 21 Object position 23 Substructures 24 Refining models 27 Copying and printing 29 Finding structures online 32 Chapter 4: Displaying Models 35 © Copyright 1998-2017 PerkinElmer Informatics Inc., All rights reserved. ii Chem3D 17.0 Display modes 35 Atom and bond size 37 Displaying dot surfaces 38 Serial numbers 38 Displaying atoms 39 Atom symbols 40 Rotating models 41 Atom and bond properties 44 Showing hydrogen bonds 45 Hydrogens and lone pairs 46 Translating models 47 Scaling models 47 Aligning models 47 Applying color 49 Model Explorer 52 Measuring molecules 59 Comparing models by overlay 62 Molecular surfaces 63 Using stereo pairs 72 Stereo enhancement 72 Setting view focus 73 Chapter 5: Building Advanced Models 74 Dummy bonds and dummy atoms 74 Substructures 75 Bonding by proximity 78 Setting measurements 78 Atom and building types 81 Stereochemistry 85 © Copyright 1998-2017 PerkinElmer Informatics Inc., All rights reserved. iii Chem3D 17.0 Building with Cartesian
  • 1 Advances in Electronic Structure Theory: Gamess a Decade Later Mark S. Gordon and Michael W. Schmidt Department of Chemistry A

    1 Advances in Electronic Structure Theory: Gamess a Decade Later Mark S. Gordon and Michael W. Schmidt Department of Chemistry A

    ADVANCES IN ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE THEORY: GAMESS A DECADE LATER MARK S. GORDON AND MICHAEL W. SCHMIDT DEPARTMENT OF CHEMISTRY AND AMES LABORATORY, IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY, AMES, IA 50011 Abstract. Recent developments in advanced quantum chemistry and quantum chemistry interfaced with model potentials are discussed, with the primary focus on new implementations in the GAMESS electronic structure suite of programs. Applications to solvent effects and surface science are discussed. 1. Introduction The past decade has seen an extraordinary growth in novel new electronic structure methods and creative implementations of these methods. Concurrently, there have been important advances in “middleware”, software that enables the implementation of efficient electronic structure algorithms. Combined with continuing improvements in computer and interconnect hardware, these advances have extended both the accuracy of computations and the sizes of molecular systems to which such methods may be applied. The great majority of the new computational chemistry algorithms have found their way into one or more broadly distributed electronic structure packages. Since this work focuses on new features of the GAMESS (General Atomic and Molecular Electronic Structure System1) suite of codes, it is important at the outset to recognize the many other packages that offer both similar and complementary features. These include ACES2 CADPAC3, DALTON4, GAMESS-UK5, HYPERCHEM6, JAGUAR7, MOLCAS8 MOLPRO9, NWChem10, PQS11, PSI312, Q-Chem13, SPARTAN14, TURBOMOLE15, and UT-Chem16. Some1,3,4,10 of these packages are distributed at no cost to all, or to academic users, while others are commercial packages, but all are generally available to users without restriction or constraint. Indeed, the developers of these codes frequently collaborate to share features, a practice that clearly benefits all of their users.