DOCSLIB.ORG

Chem3d 17.0 User Guide Chem3d 17.0

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chem3d 17.0 User Guide Chem3d 17.0 Chem3D 17.0 User Guide Chem3D 17.0 Table of Contents Recent Additions viii Chapter 1: About Chem3D 1 Additional computational engines 1 Serial numbers and technical support 3 About Chem3D Tutorials 3 Chapter 2: Chem3D Basics 5 Getting around 5 User interface preferences 9 Background settings 10 Sample files 10 Saving to Dropbox 10 Chapter 3: Basic Model Building 12 Default settings 12 Selecting a display mode 12 Using bond tools 13 Using the ChemDraw panel 15 Using other 2D drawing packages 15 Building from text 16 Adding fragments 18 Selecting atoms and bonds 18 Atom charges 21 Object position 23 Substructures 24 Refining models 27 Copying and printing 29 Finding structures online 32 Chapter 4: Displaying Models 35 © Copyright 1998-2017 PerkinElmer Informatics Inc., All rights reserved. ii Chem3D 17.0 Display modes 35 Atom and bond size 37 Displaying dot surfaces 38 Serial numbers 38 Displaying atoms 39 Atom symbols 40 Rotating models 41 Atom and bond properties 44 Showing hydrogen bonds 45 Hydrogens and lone pairs 46 Translating models 47 Scaling models 47 Aligning models 47 Applying color 49 Model Explorer 52 Measuring molecules 59 Comparing models by overlay 62 Molecular surfaces 63 Using stereo pairs 72 Stereo enhancement 72 Setting view focus 73 Chapter 5: Building Advanced Models 74 Dummy bonds and dummy atoms 74 Substructures 75 Bonding by proximity 78 Setting measurements 78 Atom and building types 81 Stereochemistry 85 © Copyright 1998-2017 PerkinElmer Informatics Inc., All rights reserved. iii Chem3D 17.0 Building with Cartesian tables 87 Building models using ISIS/Draw 88 Lone electron pairs 88 Chapter 6: Computational Engines 89 Ab initio methods 89 Semi-empirical methods 89 Force field calculation methods 89 Compute properties 90 Calculating multiple properties 92 MM2 and MMFF94 92 Gaussian 105 CONFLEX 111 MOPAC 112 GAMESS 134 Chapter 7: Parameter Tables 141 The elements 143 Building types 143 Substructures table 146 References 147 Bond stretching parameters 147 Angle bending parameters 148 Conjugated Pisystem bonds 149 Pi Atoms 150 Electronegativity adjustments 150 MM2 constants 151 MM2 atom type parameters 153 Torsional parameters 154 Out-of-plane bending 156 © Copyright 1998-2017 PerkinElmer Informatics Inc., All rights reserved. iv Chem3D 17.0 van der Waals interactions 156 Chapter 8: Docking 158 Installing AutoDock 158 Installing AutoDock Tools 158 Configuring AutoDock 159 Working with the AutoDock Interface 159 Step 1: Preparing the receptor 160 Step 2: Preparing the ligand 161 Step 3: (Optional) Defining groups 162 Step 4: Preparing the cavity (prepare GPF) 162 Step 5: Selecting pose parameters (Prepare DPF) 164 Step 6: Docking 165 Step 7: Viewing Docking Results 165 References 166 Chapter 9: Computation Concepts 167 Computational chemistry overview 167 Computational methods overview 167 Uses of computational methods 168 Geometry optimization 168 Choosing the best method 170 Molecular mechanics theory in brief 174 The force-field 174 Molecular dynamics simulation 182 Chapter 10: ChemScript 184 Why use ChemScript? 184 How ChemScript works 185 Getting Started 185 Editing Scripts 186 © Copyright 1998-2017 PerkinElmer Informatics Inc., All rights reserved. v Chem3D 17.0 Introducing the ChemScript API 187 Tutorials 188 Useful References 191 Chapter 11: Chemical properties 194 Chem3D properties 194 ChemFinder properties 221 ChemDraw properties 222 ChemDraw/Excel properties 222 Chapter 12: Keyboard modifiers 224 Rotation 224 Selection 225 Chapter 13: 2D to 3D Conversion 227 Stereochemical relationships 227 Labels 228 Chapter 14: File Formats 230 Editing file format atom types 230 Native formats 230 File format examples 230 Export file formats 262 Chapter 15: References 272 MEP 272 MM2 references 273 MOPAC 275 Chapter 16: Online Resources 289 SciStore 289 PerkinElmer Informatics 289 Online documentation 289 Online registration 289 © Copyright 1998-2017 PerkinElmer Informatics Inc., All rights reserved. vi Chem3D 17.0 ChemOffice SDK 289 Troubleshooting 289 Chapter 17: Tutorials 291 Building models 291 Examining models 303 Using calculation engines 320 © Copyright 1998-2017 PerkinElmer Informatics Inc., All rights reserved. vii Chem3D 17.0 Recent Additions Chem3D introduces a variety of improvements not found in earlier versions. These are briefly described below. Microsoft Office 2013 and Windows 8.1.Chem3D is compatible with Microsoft Office 2013 and Windows 8.1 for both 32 and 64 bit machines. Depiction and animation of GAMESS IR Vibrations.After you compute an infrared spectrum, you can view and animate the IR vibration modes and the vectors that are applied. For more information, see "Viewing and animating GAMESS IR vibrations" on page 139. Molecular Orbital Calculations using GAMESS 2013 and MOPAC 2016.You can now calculate molecular orbit- als using either GAMESS 2013 or MOPAC 2016. By default, PM7 is the basis set in the latest version of MOPAC. Support for Gaussian 09.In addition to Gaussian 03, Chem3D also supports Gaussian 09. Gaussian can be pur- chased from PerkinElmer. Support for native 64-bit GAMESS 2013.GAMESS 2013 can be downloaded from using the link http://www.ms- g.ameslab.gov/gamess/index.html . Support for V3000 MolFile Format.For both import and export. 2D projections of 3D surfaces.The volume slicing tool lets you view a two-dimension cross section of almost any molecular surface. This becomes quite useful for viewing the electron density at any location in your model. You can slice through an orbital or an entire model in either the X-, Y-, or Z-planes and adjust the location of the slice as desired. For more information, see "Volume slicing" on page 71. Saving to Dropbox.Chem3D allows you to save to Dropbox for users with a Dropbox account. You can upload and download files between your remote Dropbox folder and your local machine. You can also use Dropbox to pass files between Chem3D and the Chem3D iPad app. The Dropbox plug-in can be downloaded from the Dropbox Web site. Docking.AutoDock helps you determine how one or more small molecules may be arranged to fit inside the cavity of a larger molecule. You choose the molecules, the cavity binding sites, and calculation parameters. AutoDock cal- culates and displays the conformers and positions of each small molecule that fit your requirements. For more information, see "Docking" on page 158. CONFLEX.CONFLEX is a conformational analysis package developed by the CONFLEX Corporation. Using CONFLEX, you can search for low energy conformers of a model and create a fragment for each one in its optimal © Copyright 1998-2017 PerkinElmer Informatics Inc., All rights reserved. viii Chem3D 17.0 state. For more information, see "CONFLEX" on page 111. Molecular Networks integration.Chem3D incorporates new features from Molecular Networks for determining pKa, LogS and LogP solubility properties. See "Chem3D properties" on page 194. Also see "About Molecular Networks" on page 2. © Copyright 1998-2017 PerkinElmer Informatics Inc., All rights reserved. ix Chem3D 17.0 About Chem3D Chem3D is part of the ChemOffice suite and lets you build, visualize, and analyze 3D models of chemical structures. Chem3D models can be imported into desktop publishing tools or displayed on the Web. Additional computational engines Chem3D supports several additional computational engines. These tools are briefly mentioned below. Their full descriptions are found in respective chapters of this guide. For availability and purchase information, contact PerkinElmer Informatics. About GAMESS GAMESS is a program for ab initio molecular quantum chemistry calculations. GAMESS lets you predict UV/VIS, IR and NMR spectra, calculate energies and a number of other molecular properties. About Gaussian Chem3D supports Gaussian 03 and Gaussian 09. Gaussian is a property prediction program used by chemists, chem- ical engineers, biochemists, physicists, and other scientists. Using the ab initio and semi-empirical quantum mech- anics, Gaussian predicts the energies, molecular structures, vibrational frequencies and chemical properties of molecules and reactions in a variety of chemical environments. You can apply Gaussian to both stable compounds and compounds that are difficult or impossible to observe experimentally such as short-lived intermediates and trans- ition structures. Gaussian supports ab initio methods, such as restricted and unrestricted Hartree Fock methods. You can use ab initio and semi-empirical methods for calculating electron density surface and molecular geometry optimization. Gaussian supports ground state semi-empirical methods such as CNDO/2, INDO, MINDO3, and MDO energies and gradients. Note: The term "semi-empirical" refers to methods that use the general process dictated by quantum mechanics, but simplify it to gain speed and later use experimental data to compensate for the simplification. Note: Gaussian 03 requires 32-bit version of Windows and Gaussian 09 requires either 32-bit version or 64-bit ver- sion of Windows. See "Gaussian" on page 105 for more information. About MOPAC MOPAC performs semi-empirical calculations on atoms and molecules to determine details of molecular structures and properties. For example, with MOPAC you can perform thermodynamic calculations, geometry optimizations, and force constant calculations.Chem3D supports MOPAC 2016. Functionalities of MOPAC are provided through a Chem3D interface. MOPAC2016 includes all the capabilities of MOPAC, and is available only as an optional plug-in. MOPAC 2016 provides support for advanced features,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 20 Years of Polarizable Force Field Development
    20 YEARS OF POLARIZABLE FORCEFIELDDEVELOPMENTfor biomolecular systems thor van heesch Supervised by Daan P. Geerke and Paola Gori-Giorg 1 contents 2 1 Introduction 3 2contentsForce fields: Basics, Caveats and Extensions 4 2.1 The Classical Approach . 4 2.2 The caveats of point-charge electrostatics . 8 2.3 Physical phenomenon of polarizability . 10 2.4 Common implementation methods of electronic polarization . 11 2.5 Accounting for anisotropic interactions . 14 3 Knitting the reviews and perspectives together 17 3.1 Polarizability: A smoking gun? . 17 3.2 New branches of electronic polarization . 18 3.3 Descriptions of electrostatics . 19 3.4 Solvation and polarization . 20 3.5 The rise of new challenges . 21 3.6 Parameterization or polarization? . 22 3.7 Enough response: how far away? . 23 3.8 The last perspectives . 23 3.9 A new hope: the next-generation force fields . 29 4 Learning with machines 29 4.1 Replace the functional form with machine learned force fields . 31 4.2 A different take on polarizable force fields . 33 4.3 Are transferable parameters an universal requirement? . 33 4.4 The difference between derivation and prediction . 34 4.5 From small molecules to long range interactions . 36 4.6 Enough knowledge to fold a protein? . 37 4.7 Boltzmann generators, a not so hypothetical machine anymore . 38 5 Summary: The Red Thread 41 introduction 3 In this literature study we aimed to answer the following question: What has changedabstract in the outlook on polarizable force field development during the last 20 years? The theory, history, methods, and applications of polarizable force fields have been discussed to address this question.
    [Show full text]
  • Mercury 2.4 User Guide and Tutorials 2011 CSDS Release
    Mercury 2.4 User Guide and Tutorials 2011 CSDS Release Copyright © 2010 The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre Registered Charity No 800579 Conditions of Use The Cambridge Structural Database System (CSD System) comprising all or some of the following: ConQuest, Quest, PreQuest, Mercury, (Mercury CSD and Materials module of Mercury), VISTA, Mogul, IsoStar, SuperStar, web accessible CSD tools and services, WebCSD, CSD Java sketcher, CSD data file, CSD-UNITY, CSD-MDL, CSD-SDfile, CSD data updates, sub files derived from the foregoing data files, documentation and command procedures (each individually a Component) is a database and copyright work belonging to the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC) and its licensors and all rights are protected. Use of the CSD System is permitted solely in accordance with a valid Licence of Access Agreement and all Components included are proprietary. When a Component is supplied independently of the CSD System its use is subject to the conditions of the separate licence. All persons accessing the CSD System or its Components should make themselves aware of the conditions contained in the Licence of Access Agreement or the relevant licence. In particular: • The CSD System and its Components are licensed subject to a time limit for use by a specified organisation at a specified location. • The CSD System and its Components are to be treated as confidential and may NOT be disclosed or re- distributed in any form, in whole or in part, to any third party. • Software or data derived from or developed using the CSD System may not be distributed without prior written approval of the CCDC.
    [Show full text]
  • Pyplif HIPPOS-Assisted Prediction of Molecular Determinants of Ligand Binding to Receptors
    molecules Article PyPLIF HIPPOS-Assisted Prediction of Molecular Determinants of Ligand Binding to Receptors Enade P. Istyastono 1,* , Nunung Yuniarti 2, Vivitri D. Prasasty 3 and Sudi Mungkasi 4 1 Faculty of Pharmacy, Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta 55282, Indonesia 2 Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia; [email protected] 3 Faculty of Biotechnology, Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, Jakarta 12930, Indonesia; [email protected] 4 Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Technology, Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta 55282, Indonesia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +62-274883037 Abstract: Identification of molecular determinants of receptor-ligand binding could significantly increase the quality of structure-based virtual screening protocols. In turn, drug design process, especially the fragment-based approaches, could benefit from the knowledge. Retrospective virtual screening campaigns by employing AutoDock Vina followed by protein-ligand interaction finger- printing (PLIF) identification by using recently published PyPLIF HIPPOS were the main techniques used here. The ligands and decoys datasets from the enhanced version of the database of useful de- coys (DUDE) targeting human G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) were employed in this research since the mutation data are available and could be used to retrospectively verify the prediction. The results show that the method presented in this article could pinpoint some retrospectively verified molecular determinants. The method is therefore suggested to be employed as a routine in drug Citation: Istyastono, E.P.; Yuniarti, design and discovery. N.; Prasasty, V.D.; Mungkasi, S. PyPLIF HIPPOS-Assisted Prediction Keywords: PyPLIF HIPPOS; AutoDock Vina; drug discovery; fragment-based; molecular determi- of Molecular Determinants of Ligand Binding to Receptors.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Babel Documentation Release 2.3.1
    Open Babel Documentation Release 2.3.1 Geoffrey R Hutchison Chris Morley Craig James Chris Swain Hans De Winter Tim Vandermeersch Noel M O’Boyle (Ed.) December 05, 2011 Contents 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Goals of the Open Babel project ..................................... 3 1.2 Frequently Asked Questions ....................................... 4 1.3 Thanks .................................................. 7 2 Install Open Babel 9 2.1 Install a binary package ......................................... 9 2.2 Compiling Open Babel .......................................... 9 3 obabel and babel - Convert, Filter and Manipulate Chemical Data 17 3.1 Synopsis ................................................. 17 3.2 Options .................................................. 17 3.3 Examples ................................................. 19 3.4 Differences between babel and obabel .................................. 21 3.5 Format Options .............................................. 22 3.6 Append property values to the title .................................... 22 3.7 Filtering molecules from a multimolecule file .............................. 22 3.8 Substructure and similarity searching .................................. 25 3.9 Sorting molecules ............................................ 25 3.10 Remove duplicate molecules ....................................... 25 3.11 Aliases for chemical groups ....................................... 26 4 The Open Babel GUI 29 4.1 Basic operation .............................................. 29 4.2 Options .................................................
    [Show full text]
  • GROMACS: Fast, Flexible, and Free
    GROMACS: Fast, Flexible, and Free DAVID VAN DER SPOEL,1 ERIK LINDAHL,2 BERK HESS,3 GERRIT GROENHOF,4 ALAN E. MARK,4 HERMAN J. C. BERENDSEN4 1Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, Husargatan 3, Box 596, S-75124 Uppsala, Sweden 2Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, SCFAB, Stockholm University, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden 3Max-Planck Institut fu¨r Polymerforschung, Ackermannweg 10, D-55128 Mainz, Germany 4Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, NL-9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands Received 12 February 2005; Accepted 18 March 2005 DOI 10.1002/jcc.20291 Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). Abstract: This article describes the software suite GROMACS (Groningen MAchine for Chemical Simulation) that was developed at the University of Groningen, The Netherlands, in the early 1990s. The software, written in ANSI C, originates from a parallel hardware project, and is well suited for parallelization on processor clusters. By careful optimization of neighbor searching and of inner loop performance, GROMACS is a very fast program for molecular dynamics simulation. It does not have a force field of its own, but is compatible with GROMOS, OPLS, AMBER, and ENCAD force fields. In addition, it can handle polarizable shell models and flexible constraints. The program is versatile, as force routines can be added by the user, tabulated functions can be specified, and analyses can be easily customized. Nonequilibrium dynamics and free energy determinations are incorporated. Interfaces with popular quantum-chemical packages (MOPAC, GAMES-UK, GAUSSIAN) are provided to perform mixed MM/QM simula- tions. The package includes about 100 utility and analysis programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Automated Construction of Quantum–Classical Hybrid Models Arxiv:2102.09355V1 [Physics.Chem-Ph] 18 Feb 2021
    Automated construction of quantum{classical hybrid models Christoph Brunken and Markus Reiher∗ ETH Z¨urich, Laboratorium f¨urPhysikalische Chemie, Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 2, 8093 Z¨urich, Switzerland February 18, 2021 Abstract We present a protocol for the fully automated construction of quantum mechanical-(QM){ classical hybrid models by extending our previously reported approach on self-parametri- zing system-focused atomistic models (SFAM) [J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2020, 16 (3), 1646{1665]. In this QM/SFAM approach, the size and composition of the QM region is evaluated in an automated manner based on first principles so that the hybrid model describes the atomic forces in the center of the QM region accurately. This entails the au- tomated construction and evaluation of differently sized QM regions with a bearable com- putational overhead that needs to be paid for automated validation procedures. Applying SFAM for the classical part of the model eliminates any dependence on pre-existing pa- rameters due to its system-focused quantum mechanically derived parametrization. Hence, QM/SFAM is capable of delivering a high fidelity and complete automation. Furthermore, since SFAM parameters are generated for the whole system, our ansatz allows for a con- venient re-definition of the QM region during a molecular exploration. For this purpose, a local re-parametrization scheme is introduced, which efficiently generates additional clas- sical parameters on the fly when new covalent bonds are formed (or broken) and moved to the classical region. arXiv:2102.09355v1 [physics.chem-ph] 18 Feb 2021 ∗Corresponding author; e-mail: [email protected] 1 1 Introduction In contrast to most protocols of computational quantum chemistry that consider isolated molecules, chemical processes can take place in a vast variety of complex environments.
    [Show full text]
  • Instructions on Making Pdf Files Containing 3D
    Detailed Instructions for Creating an Embedded Virtual 3-D Image of a Molecule Creating the documents with embedded virtual three-dimensional images may be done fairly easily by repeating the following procedures. Once you have embedded your first image, the use of that image is limited only by your imagination. The following instructions are written in extreme detail with annotated screen shots of the four programs you will use throughout for clarification. Once you are familiar with the procedure embedding a structure of interest should take less than 20 min., limited only by the speed with which you can click a mouse. In practice most of our embedded 3-D images have been created by our undergraduate student collaborators. Step 1. Creating a 2-D image in ChemSketch Using ACD ChemSketch 11.0 Freeware (http://www.acdlabs.com/download/chemsk_download.html ) a two dimensional structure may be drawn as per your specific need (see Figure 1). Once the molecule is drawn, optimized it by clicking the 3-D optimization button then save as an MDL molfile (*.mol). Figure 1: A screen shot of acetone drawn with ChemSketch after 3-D optimization. Step 2. Converting the *.mol file to a *.pdb file using Open Babel The file can now be converted from a .mol file to a .pdb file, Protein Data Bank format, to be properly accessed with the Adobe Acrobat 3D Toolkit 8.1.0. The file conversion is done using Open Babel Graphical User Interface v2.2.0 (openbabel.sourceforge.net) under default settings. Step by step instructions: A.
    [Show full text]
  • Designing Universal Chemical Markup (UCM) Through the Reusable Methodology Based on Analyzing Existing Related Formats
    Designing Universal Chemical Markup (UCM) through the reusable methodology based on analyzing existing related formats Background: In order to design concepts for a new general-purpose chemical format we analyzed the strengths and weaknesses of current formats for common chemical data. While the new format is discussed more in the next article, here we describe our software s t tools and two stage analysis procedure that supplied the necessary information for the n i r development. The chemical formats analyzed in both stages were: CDX, CDXML, CML, P CTfile and XDfile. In addition the following formats were included in the first stage only: e r P CIF, InChI, NCBI ASN.1, NCBI XML, PDB, PDBx/mmCIF, PDBML, SMILES, SLN and Mol2. Results: A two stage analysis process devised for both XML (Extensible Markup Language) and non-XML formats enabled us to verify if and how potential advantages of XML are utilized in the widely used general-purpose chemical formats. In the first stage we accumulated information about analyzed formats and selected the formats with the most general-purpose chemical functionality for the second stage. During the second stage our set of software quality requirements was used to assess the benefits and issues of selected formats. Additionally, the detailed analysis of XML formats structure in the second stage helped us to identify concepts in those formats. Using these concepts we came up with the concise structure for a new chemical format, which is designed to provide precise built-in validation capabilities and aims to avoid the potential issues of analyzed formats.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Protein-Ligand Docking Methods on Peptide-Ligand
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/212514; this version posted November 1, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Evaluation of protein-ligand docking methods on peptide-ligand complexes for docking small ligands to peptides Sandeep Singh1#, Hemant Kumar Srivastava1#, Gaurav Kishor1#, Harinder Singh1, Piyush Agrawal1 and G.P.S. Raghava1,2* 1CSIR-Institute of Microbial Technology, Sector 39A, Chandigarh, India. 2Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology, Okhla Phase III, Delhi India #Authors Contributed Equally Emails of Authors: SS: [email protected] HKS: [email protected] GK: [email protected] HS: [email protected] PA: [email protected] * Corresponding author Professor of Center for Computation Biology, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology (IIIT Delhi), Okhla Phase III, New Delhi-110020, India Phone: +91-172-26907444 Fax: +91-172-26907410 E-mail: [email protected] Running Title: Benchmarking of docking methods 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/212514; this version posted November 1, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. ABSTRACT In the past, many benchmarking studies have been performed on protein-protein and protein-ligand docking however there is no study on peptide-ligand docking.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on OLEX2
    Notes on OLEX2 Updated on 12 January 2018,at 09:05. Olex2 v1.2-dev © OlexSys Ltd. 2004 – 2016 Compilation Info: 2017.07.20 svn.r3457 MSC:150030729 on WIN64, Python: 2.7.5, wxWidgets: 3.1.0 for OlexSys Ilia A. Guzei 2124 Chemistry Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1101 University Ave, Madison, WI 53706 USA. This is work in progress. You are encouraged to e-mail me ([email protected]) your comments, corrections, and suggestions. Many thanks to Nattamai Bhuvanesh, Brian Dolinar, Oleg Dolomanov, Dean Johnston, Horst Puschmann, Amy Sarjeant, Charlotte Stern, for proof- reading, suggestions, and comments. I have also borrowed from Martin Lutz, Len Barbour, Richard Staples and Tony Linden. OLEX2 Manual Table of Content Table of Content ........................................................................................................................... 2 How to install OLEX2 under Windows .......................................................................................... 3 How to install OLEX2 on a Mac .................................................................................................... 6 Installing and using PLATON on a Mac ........................................................................................ 8 How to get OLEX2 to use PLATON ............................................................................................ 11 About program OLEX2 ................................................................................................................ 11 Keyboard shortcuts .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Melissa Gajewski & Jonathan Mane
    Melissa Gajewski & Jonathan Mane Molecular Mechanics (MM) Methods Force fields & potential energy calculations Example using noscapine Molecular Dynamics (MD) Methods Ensembles & trajectories Example using 18-crown-6 Quantum Mechanics (QM) Methods Schrödinger’s equation Semi-empirical (SE) Wave Functional Theory (WFT) Density Functional Theory (DFT) Hybrid QM/MM & MD Methods Comparison of hybrid methods 2 3 Molecular Mechanics (MM) Methods Force fields & potential energy calculations Example using noscapine Molecular Dynamics (MD) Methods Ensembles & trajectories Example using 18-crown-6 Quantum Mechanics (QM) Methods Schrödinger’s equation Semi-empirical (SE) Wave Functional Theory (WFT) Density Functional Theory (DFT) Hybrid QM/MM & MD Methods Comparison of hybrid methods 4 Useful for all system size ◦ Small molecules, proteins, material assemblies, surface science, etc … ◦ Based on Newtonian mechanics (classical mechanics) d F = (mv) dt ◦ The potential energy of the system is calculated using a force field € 5 An atom is considered as a single particle Example: H atom Particle variables: ◦ Radius (typically van der Waals radius) ◦ Polarizability ◦ Net charge Obtained from experiment or QM calculations ◦ Bond interactions Equilibrium bond lengths & angles from experiment or QM calculations 6 All atom approach ◦ Provides parameters for every atom in the system (including hydrogen) Ex: In –CH3 each atom is assigned a set of data MOLDEN MOLDEN (Radius, polarizability, netMOLDENMOLDENMOLDENMOLDENMOLDEN charge,
    [Show full text]
  • Visualizing 3D Molecular Structures Using an Augmented Reality App
    Visualizing 3D molecular structures using an augmented reality app Kristina Eriksen, Bjarne E. Nielsen, Michael Pittelkow 5 Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 5, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT 10 We present a simple procedure to make an augmented reality app to visualize any 3D chemical model. The molecular structure may be based on data from crystallographic data or from computer modelling. This guide is made in such a way, that no programming skills are needed and the procedure uses free software and is a way to visualize 3D structures that are normally difficult to comprehend in the 2D 15 space of paper. The process can be applied to make 3D representation of any 2D object, and we envisage the app to be useful when visualizing simple stereochemical problems, when presenting a complex 3D structure on a poster presentation or even in audio-visual presentations. The method works for all molecules including small molecules, supramolecular structures, MOFs and biomacromolecules. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT 20 KEYWORDS Augmented reality, Unity, Vuforia, Application, 3D models. 25 Journal 5/18/21 Page 1 of 14 INTRODUCTION Conveying information about three-dimensional (3D) structures in two-dimensional (2D) space, such as on paper or a screen can be difficult. Augmented reality (AR) provides an opportunity to visualize 2D 30 structures in 3D. Software to make simple AR apps is becoming common and ranges of free software now exist to make customized apps. AR has transformed visualization in computer games and films, but the technique is distinctly under-used in (chemical) science.1 In chemical science the challenge of visualizing in 3D exists at several levels ranging from teaching of stereo chemistry problems at freshman university level to visualizing complex molecular structures at 35 the forefront of chemical research.
    [Show full text]